Skip to main content
Download PDF

Assessment of post-COVID-19 fatigue among female survivors 2 years after hospital discharge: a nested case–control study

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 2455 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Fatigue is a common symptom of long COVID syndrome. Compared to male survivors, females have a higher incidence of post-COVID fatigue. Therefore, long-term follow-up is necessary to understand which groups of females are more vulnerable to post-COVID fatigue.

Methods

This is a nested case–control study of female COVID-19 survivors who were discharged from two designated hospitals in Wuhan, China in 2020, and received 2-year follow-up from March 1 to April 6, 2022. All patients completed the Checklist Individual Strength-subscale subjective fatigue (CIS-fatigue), a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; including the HADS-Anxiety [HADS-A] and the HADS-Depression [HADS-D]). Individuals with CIS-fatigue scores of 27 or higher were classified as cases. The risk factors for fatigue was analysed with multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 899 female COVID-19 survivors were enrolled for analysis, including 47 cases and 852 controls. Compared with controls, cases had higher CAT, HADS-A and HADS-D scores, and showed a higher prevalence of symptoms, including anxiety (cases vs. controls, 44.7% vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001), chest tightness (21.2% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001), dyspnoea (19.1% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001) and so on. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.06; p = 0.02) and cerebrovascular disease (OR, 11.32; 95% CI, 2.87–43.00; p < 0.001) were risk factors for fatigue. Fatigue had a statistically significant moderate correlation with depression (r = 0.44, p < 0.001), but not with CAT ≥ 10.

Conclusion

Female COVID-19 patients who had cerebrovascular disease and older age have higher risk of fatigue. Patients with fatigue have higher CAT scores, and are more likely to have concurrent depression.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide, with over 767 million confirmed cases as of 19 June 2023. Clinical manifestations include fever, cough, dyspnoea, myalgia, fatigue, normal or decreased leukocyte counts, and radiographic evidence of pneumonia [1]. Therapeutic options for COVID-19 remain limited, with some available in the market showing lower efficacy in real-world settings [2]. As patients recover from the acute phase, persistent, prolonged, and often debilitating sequelae are increasingly recognised in convalescent individuals, named ‘post-COVID-19 syndrome’ or ‘long COVID’ [3,4,5]. Long COVID was defined by WHO as symptoms in those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, usually 3 months from the onset of COVID-19 and last for at least 2 months and cannot be explained by other diagnoses [6].

Fatigue has been consistently reported as one of the most significant symptoms of long COVID [7]. Previous studies have reported that 20–60% of patients suffer from post-COVID-fatigue [8, 9]. Although all symptoms continued to improve during the follow-up visit, recent studies have shown that fatigue is the most common symptom, regardless of the recovery time [10, 11]. According to a study by Cao et al. [10], sex, education, and preexisting comorbidities were risk factors in patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue who were discharged from hospital. Mazurkiewicz et al. included 303 non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and found that females more often suffered from persistent fatigue [12]. Of note, more females suffer from fatigue than males, and current evidence supports that female sex is a risk factor for post-COVID symptoms, including fatigue, anxiety, and depression [13]. However, few studies have explained the risk factors that contribute to the development of fatigue among female and few have quantitatively revealed the correlation between fatigue and mood disorders (including anxiety and depression). Therefore, further clinical analyses focusing on females are necessary to demonstrate which groups of females are more vulnerable to post-COVID fatigue up to 2 years after illness onset. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the risk factors for fatigue in female COVID-19 survivors and the correlation between fatigue and mood disorders.

Methods

Study design and cohort

This study employed a nested case–control design using a multicentred prospective study cohort of COVID-19 patients who were discharged from Huoshenshan Hospital and Taikang Tongji Hospital (both in Wuhan, China) between February 12 and April 10, 2020. One-year and 2-year follow up (from March 1 to April 6, 2022) visits were performed on this cohort to investigate the long-term symptom burden of COVID-19, which have been reported in our previous studies [14]. The study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines for nested case–control studies and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Daping Hospital, an affiliated hospital of Army Medical University (No. 202153). Informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal representatives before the survey. All the methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations from Declaration of Helsinki.

Case and control definition

The inclusion criterion was that female patients at 2 year follow up who had completed the Checklist Individual Strength–subscale subjective fatigue (CIS-fatigue), a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; including the HADS-Anxiety [HADS-A] and the HADS-Depression [HADS-D]). The exclusion criteria included (1) those who declined to participate, (2) those unable to be contacted and (3) those deceased. CIS-fatigue, a standardized questionnaire with high internal consistency and test–retest reliability, is used to assess fatigue symptoms. The questionnaire consists of 8 items scored on a 7-point Likert scale. Total Scores range from 8 to 56 points, and a higher score indicates more clinical symptoms of general fatigue. Individuals with CIS-fatigue scores of 27 or higher were classified as cases, while those with scores below 27 were classified as controls.

Procedures and data acquisition

All female patients were contacted in the order of their discharge date documented in their medical records, and were interviewed via telephone by trained physicians. Various questionnaires were used, including a self-reported symptom table, CIS-fatigue [15, 16], CAT, and HADS (including HADS-A and HADS-D) (Additional file 1). CAT, initially designed to assess symptom burden of patients with COPD [17], was also capable to be applied to assess symptom burden of COVID-19 survivors [18]. HADS was used to measure mood symptoms of anxiety and depression [19]. Each subscale consists of 7 questions with a 4-point Likert scale (0–3). The scores of at least 8 indicates the presence of symptoms of anxiety or depression [20]. The self-reported symptom questionnaire included sweating, chest tightness, anxiety, myalgia, palpitation, cough, chest pain, dizziness, expectoration, dyspnea, headache, edema, taste change, smell reduction, sore throat, anorexia, diarrhea, hemoptysis, nausea, chill, vomiting, rhinobyon, short of breath, abdominal pain, hearing loss, alopecia, joint, and back pain. In this article, “symptoms-2y” was short for the number of symptoms reported in at 2-year follow-up.

Clinical data of patients during hospitalization were retrieved from electronic medical records, including demographic characteristics (self-report age and sex), clinical characteristics (self-reported comorbidities), and clinical treatments (ICU admission, oxygen therapy, and mechanical ventilation). In this article, "co-burden" was short for the number of self-reported comorbidities.

Disease severity was defined by World Health Organization guideline for COVID-19. Severe pneumonia refers to fever or suspected respiratory infection, plus one of the following: respiratory rate greater than 30 breaths per minute, severe respiratory distress, or oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) less than or equal to 93% on room air [21]. We double-entered and validated all data using EpiData software version 3.1 (EpiData Association).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as median (IQR), followed by Mann–Whitney U test, and categorical variables were presented as absolute values along with percentages, followed by the Pearson χ2 test or Fisher exact test when appropriate.

To identify factors associated with the risk of occurrence of fatigue defined by CIS-fatigue, univariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors with p < 0.10, and then it was adjusted by a stepwise (forward likelihood ratio) selection process in multivariable logistic regression model. All the scores of scales were subjected to Spearman correlation. Each test was 2-sided, p < 0.05 was considered significant, and correlation coefficient > 0.6 was considered highly associated. Data were analysed with SPSS statistical package version 26.0 for Windows (IBM SPSS Statistics) and R statistical software version 4.1.1 (R Project for Statistical Computing).

Results

Patient characteristics

After 2 years discharged from the hospital, 1864 patients were successfully followed up including 938 female patients. And 899 female patients were enrolled in the study for current analysis, except 39 participants who didn’t finish all the scales. Among them, 47 (5.2%) were classified as cases based on the score of CIS-fatigue (Fig. 1 and Additional file 2), while the remaining 852 were controls. The median (IQR) age of enrolled patients was 59 (50–68), and the median (IQR) length of hospital stay was 14 (8–20) days. During hospitalization, 17 patients (1.9%) were admitted to the ICU, and 627 patients (69.7%) received oxygen therapy (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flowchart

Full size image
Table1 Characteristics of enrolled patients
Full size table

The median (IQR) age of cases was 66 (57–71), while the median (IQR) age of controls was 58 (50–67). Compared with controls, cases suffered from higher prevalence of hypertension (cases vs controls, 42.6% vs 26.6%, p = 0.027), diabetes (cases vs controls, 25.5% vs 12.3%, p = 0.017), cerebrovascular disease (cases vs controls, 10.6% vs 0.7%, p < 0.001) and tracheitis (cases vs controls, 4.3% vs 0.8%, p = 0.048). However, no significant differences were found in terms of disease severity, the length of hospital stay, and the percentage of other diseases (eg. cardiovascular disease, chronic liver disease, chronic kidney disease or COPD) (Table 1).

Characteristics of long COVID syndrome at 2-year follow-up

The most common post-COVID symptoms in cases were anxiety (44.7%), chest tightness (21.2%) and dyspnea (19.1%) while in controls were anxiety (4.0%), joint and back pain (3.3%) and chest tightness (2.3%) (Additional file 3). The prevalence of several symptoms was significantly higher in cases compared to controls, such as sweating, chest tightness, anxiety, myalgia, palpitation, cough, chest pain, expectoration, dyspnea, edema and diarrhea (Fig. 2). Besides, those symptoms were subjected to Spearman correlation. In cases, chest pain was highly associated with chest tightness (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) while expectoration was highly associated with cough (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) (Additional file 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The percentage of symptom burden of cases and controls. *significant at α = 0.05 level

Full size image

CAT scores at 2-year follow-up

Of the enrolled patients, 55 (6.1%) were grouped as CAT ≥ 10, while 844 (93.8%) were CAT < 10 (Additional file 5). Case group had higher CAT scores than control group (median [IQR], cases vs controls, 8 [4.5–13] vs 2 [0–4]; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3a). Among the 47 cases, 17 (36.1%) patients were scored as CAT ≥ 10, and the rate was higher than controls (38[4.5%]; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Total scores of CAT, HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression in cases and controls. A Total CAT score. B Percentage of patients with CAT score ≥ 10 and < 10; C Total HADS-Anxiety score. D Percentage of patients with HADS-A score ≥ 8 and < 8; E Total HADS-Depression score. F Percentage of patients with HADS-D score ≥ 8 and < 8. *significant at α = 0.05 level

Full size image

HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression scores at 2-year follow-up

A total of 46 (5.1%) patients were grouped as having anxiety (Additional file 6). Cases had higher HADS-anxiety scores than controls (median [IQR], 7 [3–9.5] vs 2 [0–4]; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3c). Among cases, 18 (38.3%) were with anxiety, and the rate was higher than that of control subjects (28 [3.3%]; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3d).

The overall incidence of depression in survivors was 8.6% (Additional file 7). Cases had higher HADS-depression scores than controls (median [IQR], 8 [6,–13] vs 4 [2,–6]; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3e). The rate of depression in cases was 61.7%, which was higher than in controls (49 [5.8%]; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3f).

The risk factors of fatigue at 2-year follow-up

Compared with non-fatigue individuals, age, disease severity, oxygen therapy, hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, tracheitis were associated with fatigue under univariable analysis. ln multivariable analysis, age (OR, 1.03; 95%CI, 1.01–1.06; p = 0.02) and cerebrovascular disease (OR, 11.32; 95%CI, 2.87–43.00; p < 0.001) were the risk factors of fatigue (Fig. 4). Statistically significant moderate correlations were found between CIS ≥ 27 and HADS-D ≥ 8 (r = 0.44, p < 0.001) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Logistic regression models to evaluate the risk factors for fatigue

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Spearman's rank correlation matrix and correlation significances of relevant variables. *significant at α = 0.05 level

Full size image

Discussion

This nested case–control study focused on the incidence and risk factors of post-COVID-19 fatigue among female survivors. A significant proportion (5.2%) of survivors still experienced fatigue 2 years after discharge. Compared to controls, those with fatigue demonstrated higher scores on the CAT, HADS-anxiety, and HADS-depression. Age and cerebrovascular disease are risk factors for fatigue. Additionally, there were significant moderate correlations between CIS ≥ 27 and HADS-D ≥ 8. Collectively, these findings add to the current knowledge on post-COVID-19 fatigue, especially among female survivors.

Symptoms contributing to long COVID included fatigue, brain fog, dizziness, palpitations, loss of or change in smell or taste, chronic cough, and chest pain [22]. The underlying pathogenesis of long COVID may conclude three aspects, including immune dysregulation, persistent inflammation, and dysfunction of the endothelium [23]. IL-6, produced by abnormal immunity, may cause pulmonary fibrosis, vascular disease, and psychological disorders [24, 25], even at fatigue onset [26]. Sustained inflammation in the central-peripheral nervous system, which contributes to oxidative stress and autoimmunity, may cause neurocognitive disorders and chronic fatigue [27]. Endothelial dysfunction may lead to inflammation, which is a critical driver of pulmonary vascular diseases and other enduring complications [28].

Fatigue has long been a concern shared by many people, since it is a condition that is not only widely seen after recovery from numerous diseases [29, 30] but is also a typical symptom of patients who have been infected with coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-1 and MERS [31]. 40.3% of survivors suffered from SARS reported fatigue four years later [32].

For SARS-CoV-2, which is also a coronavirus, fatigue was found to be a common symptom from the outset, with 69% of patients reporting persistent fatigue for nearly 2 months after discharge [33]. Moreover, fatigue is more common in female patients than male. Tracking female patients would help investigate the risk factors for post-COVID-19 fatigue, offer new insights into the sequelae of coronavirus infection, and deepen the understanding of fatigue itself [34]. Promisingly, effective therapies such as pulmonary rehabilitation, exercise training, education, and behavioural changes [5], can improve fatigue in COVID-19 survivors [35].

In the current study, we found that depression, rather than anxiety, was correlated with the onset of fatigue. This may be because, unlike anxiety, the development of depression and fatigue share common pathophysiological mechanisms of immune-mediated injury and neuroinflammation, with their causal relationship already being verified [36]. Age, as an important risk factor for adverse health outcomes (including disease severity, mortality, and severity of sequelae) of COVID-19, is the risk factor for the onset of fatigue in females [37]. There is also evidence that older patients are more likely to develop post-COVID fatigue [38]. Co-occurring cerebrovascular diseases are also risk factors for fatigue. Patients admitted with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic had a significantly higher probability of death [39], which is one of the risk factors for the severity of COVID-19 [40]. In our study, cerebrovascular diseases also had an impact on the long-term outcomes of COVID-19. Furthermore, post-stroke fatigue is one of the most common complications of stroke. In different regions of the world, female sex is a risk factor for post-stroke fatigue [41], indicating that there may be special connections between female sex and the occurrence of fatigue. What's more, patients with cerebrovascular diseases are more likely to experience chronic fatigue [42].

This study has some limitations. First, the sample size of the study is limited. Because the enrolled patients were less than half of the eligible population discharged from hospital, the potential risk for fatigue may be underestimated. Furthermore, the study assessed physical fatigue but not chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). CFS is a clinically defined condition characterised by severe disabling fatigue and a combination of symptoms [43]. In previous reports, many symptoms of COVID-19 were similar to those of CFS, thus some researchers have used the CIS-fatigue to evaluate fatigue in patients [16, 44]. Thirdly, patients included were infected with wild-type strain and received hospital admission. The constantly emerging coronavirus variants and the tendcy of non-hospitalized therapy may lead to different health outcomes and risk factors with our findings.

Conclusion

This study found in female COVID-19 patients, cerebrovascular disease and older age could contribute to a higher risk of fatigue. Patients with fatigue have higher CAT scores, and are more likely to have concurrent depression. More importantly, our findings improved the understanding of the possible causes of fatigue in female survivors in order to develop effective strategies for prevention.

Availability of data and materials

Restrictions apply to the availability of these data and so they are not publicly available. However, data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with the permission of the institution.

Abbreviations

CIS-fatigue:

The Checklist Individual Strength-subscale subjective fatigue

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CAT:

A chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test

HADS:

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

HADS-A:

The HADS-Anxiety

HADS-D:

The HADS-Depression

symptoms-2y:

The number of symptoms reported in at 2-year follow-up

co-burden:

The number of self-reported comorbidities

CFS:

Chronic fatigue syndrome

References

  1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharun K, Tiwari R, Yatoo MI, et al. A comprehensive review on pharmacologic agents, immunotherapies and supportive therapeutics for COVID-19. Narra J. 2022;2(3):e92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet. 2021;397(10270):220–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballouz T, Menges D, Anagnostopoulos A, et al. Recovery and symptom trajectories up to two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection: population based, longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2023;31(381):e074425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanchez-Ramirez DC, Normand K, Zhaoyun Y, Torres-Castro R. Long-Term Impact of COVID-19: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Biomedicines. 2021;9(8):900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Soriano JB, Murthy S, Marshall JC, Relan P, Diaz JV. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(4):e102–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thaweethai T, Jolley SE, Karlson EW, et al. Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA. 2023;25:e238823.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ceban F, Ling S, Lui LMW, et al. Fatigue and cognitive impairment in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;101:93–135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Joli J, Buck P, Zipfel S, Stengel A. Post-COVID-19 fatigue: A systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:947973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang L, Li X, Gu X, et al. Health outcomes in people 2 years after surviving hospitalisation with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Resp Med. 2022;10(9):863–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Khatib S, Sabobeh T, Habib A, et al. Post-COVID-19 fatigue as a major health problem: a cross-sectional study from Missouri, USA. Ir J Med Sci (1971 -) 2022; 192, 699–705 (2023).

  12. Mazurkiewicz I, Chatys-Bogacka Z, Slowik J, et al. Fatigue after COVID-19 in non-hospitalized patients according to sex. Brain Behav. 2023;13(2):e2849.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Martín-Guerrero JD, Pellicer-Valero ÓJ, et al. Female Sex Is a Risk Factor Associated with Long-Term Post-COVID Related-Symptoms but Not with COVID-19 Symptoms: The LONG-COVID-EXP-CM Multicenter Study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(2):413.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang X, Hou C, Shen Y, et al. Two-Year Health Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Survivors in China. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(9):e2231790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1994;38(5):383–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heesakkers H, van der Hoeven JG, Corsten S, et al. Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With 1-Year Survival Following Intensive Care Unit Treatment for COVID-19. JAMA-J Am Med ASSOC. 2022;327(6):559–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, Wiklund I, Chen WH, Kline LN. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(3):648–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Daynes E, Gerlis C, Briggs-Price S, Jones P, Singh SJ. COPD assessment test for the evaluation of COVID-19 symptoms. Thorax. 2021;76(2):185–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Rodríguez-Jiménez J, Palacios-Ceña M, et al. Psychometric Properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Previously Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(15):9273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiat Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aman AT, Wibawa T, Kosasih H, et al. Etiologies of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) and misdiagnosis of influenza in Indonesia, 2013–2016. Influenza Other Resp. 2021;15(1):34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fahriani M, Ilmawan M, Fajar JK, et al. Persistence of long COVID symptoms in COVID-19 survivors worldwide and its potential pathogenesis - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Narra J. 2021;1(2):e36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wanjari M, Late S, Sharma R, et al. Long-term pulmonary and extra-pulmonary consequences of COVID-19: A comprehensive review of current evidence and future perspectives. Narra J. 2023;3(2):e156.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Durstenfeld MS, Peluso MJ, Kelly JD, et al. Role of antibodies, inflammatory markers, and echocardiographic findings in postacute cardiopulmonary symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection. JCI Insight. 2022;7(10):e157053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jankord R, Turk JR, Schadt JC, et al. Sex difference in link between interleukin-6 and stress. Endocrinology. 2007;148(8):3758–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Castanares-Zapatero D, Chalon P, Kohn L, et al. Pathophysiology and mechanism of long COVID: a comprehensive review. Ann Med. 2022;54(1):1473–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Y, Cao W, Xiao M, et al. Clinical and coagulation characteristics of 7 patients with critical COVID-2019 pneumonia and acro-ischemia. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41(04):302–7. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.0006.

  28. Manjaly ZM, Harrison NA, Critchley HD, et al. Pathophysiological and cognitive mechanisms of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90(6):642–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Repping-Wuts H, Fransen J, van Achterberg T, Bleijenberg G, van Riel P. Persistent severe fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(11c):377–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zedlitz AMEE, Visser-Meily AJMA, Schepers VP, Geurts ACH, Fasotti L. Patients with Severe Poststroke Fatigue Show a Psychosocial Profile Comparable to Patients with Other Chronic Disease: Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment. ISRN Neurol. 2011;2011:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahn SH, Kim JL, Kim JR, et al. Association between chronic fatigue syndrome and suicidality among survivors of Middle East respiratory syndrome over a 2-year follow-up period. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;137:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lam MH, Wing YK, Yu MW, et al. Mental morbidities and chronic fatigue in severe acute respiratory syndrome survivors: long-term follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2142–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mandal S, Barnett J, Brill SE, et al. “Long-COVID”: a cross-sectional study of persisting symptoms, biomarker and imaging abnormalities following hospitalisation for COVID-19. Thorax. 2021;76(4):396–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Verveen A, Müller F, Lloyd A, et al. A research agenda for post-COVID-19 fatigue. J Psychosom Res. 2022;154:110726.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ahmed I, Mustafaoglu R, Yeldan I, Yasaci Z, Erhan B. Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(10):2051–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mazza MG, Palladini M, Villa G, De Lorenzo R, Rovere Querini P, Benedetti F. Prevalence, trajectory over time, and risk factor of post-COVID-19 fatigue. J Psychiatr Res. 2022;155:112–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen Y, Klein SL, Garibaldi BT, et al. Aging in COVID-19: Vulnerability, immunity and intervention. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;65:101205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Finsterer J, Mahjoub SZ. Fatigue in healthy and diseased individuals. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014;31(5):562–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Katsanos AH, Palaiodimou L, Zand R, et al. Changes in Stroke Hospital Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2021;52(11):3651–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yu J, Wu B, Yang J, Lei X, Shen W. Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease is Associated With Severity and Mortality of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biol Res Nurs. 2021;23(2):258–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang S, Cheng S, Zhang Z, Wang C, Wang A, Zhu W. Related risk factors associated with post-stroke fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2021;42(4):1463–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Engelen BG, Kalkman JS, Schillings ML, Van Der Werf SP, Bleijenberg G, Zwarts MJ. Fatigue in neuromuscular disease. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004;148(27):1336–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121(12):953–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Callard F, Perego E. How and why patients made Long Covid. Soc Sci Med. 2021;268:113426.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all patients who participated in this study and their families. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82272908), the National Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (2023NSCQ-JQX0190), the Joint Scientific Research Project of the Chongqing Health Commission and the Science and Technology Commission (2020FYYX213), the Outstanding Youth Science Fund of Chongqing (cstc2020jcyjjqX0014), Chongqing Talent Fund (CQYC202005003), and Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burn and Combined Injury (SKLYQ202102). The funders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yidan Ye, Chuyue Xiong and Yang Dai contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China

    Yidan Ye, Chuyue Xiong, Yang Dai, Yan Wang, Xinyue Yang, Chao Hou, Naifu Nie, Huan Tang, Guoqiang Cao, Yong He, Ji Jiang & Li Li

  2. Department of Medical and Research Management, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China

    Lixia Cheng

  3. Wuhan Taikang Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China

    Lixia Cheng

  4. Department of Epidemiology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China

    Xiangyu Ma

  5. Department of Trauma Medical Center, Daping Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns, and Combined Injury, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China

    Anqiang Zhang

  6. Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital, Wuhan, China

    Guoqiang Cao & Li Li

Authors
  1. Yidan Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chuyue Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yang Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xinyue Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lixia Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chao Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Naifu Nie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Huan Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiangyu Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Anqiang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Guoqiang Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yong He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Ji Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Li Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LL, JJ, YH and GC conceived of and designed the study. LL, YY, CX, YW, XY, XM drafted the paper. YY, CX, YD, LC, CH, NN, HT and AZ collected and verified the data. YY, CX did the analysis. All authors had full access to the data in the study, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and agreed to submit the final version for publication. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ji Jiang or Li Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines for nested case–control studies and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Daping Hospital, an affiliated hospital of Army Medical University (No. 202153). Informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal representatives before the survey. All the methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations from Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Covid-19 Survivors two-year Clinical Sequelae Follow-up Questionnaire. Scores Distribution on CIS-fatigue. Symptoms of Long Covid Syndrome. Spearman's rank correlation matrix and correlation significances of 11 self-reported symptoms. Scores Distribution on CAT. Scores Distribution on HADS-A. Scores Distribution on HADS-D.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, Y., Xiong, C., Dai, Y. et al. Assessment of post-COVID-19 fatigue among female survivors 2 years after hospital discharge: a nested case–control study. BMC Public Health 23, 2455 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17382-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17382-0

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us