Skip to main content
Download PDF

Severity of adipose tissue dysfunction is associated with progression of pre-diabetes to type 2 diabetes: the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

BMC Public Health volume 24, Article number: 121 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The association of prediabetes (Pre-DM) regression and progression with visceral adiposity index (VAI) and adipose tissue dysfunction (ATD) remains to be investigated.

Methods

The present cohort study was conducted within the framework of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) on 1458 Pre-DM cases (aged ≥ 21 years) who were followed for nine years. VAI was estimated based on waist circumference, body mass index, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. ATD status (i.e., absent, mild-moderate, and severe) was defined based on the age-stratified cutoff values of VAI. Multinomial logistic regression models with adjustment of potential confounders were used to estimate the chance of Pre-DM regression to normoglycemia or progression to T2D across ATD status.

Results

During the study follow-up, 39.0% of the participants developed T2D, and 37.7% returned to normoglycemia. Compared to mild-moderate ATD, Pre-DM subjects with severe ATD had a higher risk of developing T2D by 45% (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 11.08–1.93). Severe ATD was also associated with a decreased chance of returning to normoglycemia by 26% (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.55–0.99). Participants with severe ATD had significantly higher fasting (overall mean = 111, 95% CI = 109–112 vs. 106, 95% CI = 105–108 mg/dL) and 2h-serum glucose (overall mean = 165, 95% CI = 161–168 vs. 153, 95% CI = 149–156 mg/dL) concentrations over time.

Conclusion

Severe ATD was associated with an elevated risk of developing T2D and longitudinal poor-glycemic controls in Pre-DM subjects. ATD may be a simple and useful index for detecting subjects at a higher risk of Pre-DM progression to T2D, allowing for timely intervention strategies.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Pre-diabetes (Pre-DM) is an intermediate state of hyperglycemia, diagnosed by either impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or combined IFG-IGT [1]. Pre-DM will progress to type 2 diabetes (T2D) in 25% of participants during three-five years, and 70% of Pre-DM subjects are expected to develop T2D within their lifetime [2, 3]. Although obesity is considered an independent risk factor of pre-DM progression to T2D, it remains inconclusive which obesity measure can predict Pre-DM regression and progression better [2, 4, 5]. Compared to waist circumference, a reduction of more than five% in body weight and body mass index showed more significant associations with regression of both Pre-DM and T2D; in contrast, reduction in neck circumference (i.e., a marker of upper body subcutaneous fat) was not associated with regression of Pre-DM and T2D [4]. Excess visceral fat but not general adiposity was independently associated with incidence of Pre-DM and T2D; during a median seven years of follow-up, each one kg-weight gain was independently associated with risk of T2D by 6%, with no associations for body mass index, total body fat, or subcutaneous fat [5].

Although body mass index (BMI) has traditionally been used as a surrogate measure of adiposity, body fat distribution strongly influences the development of glucose intolerance and T2D [5, 6]. Excessive visceral fat, but not general adiposity, was independently associated with the risk of pre-DM and developing T2D [5]. Visceral adiposity index (VAI), an empirical mathematical sex-specific model composed of anthropometric and lipid measures validated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), accurately estimates the visceral adiposity accumulation and dysfunction associated with cardiometabolic risk [7,8,9,10]. VAI showed a strong correlation with both area and volume of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), insulin sensitivity, and impaired glucose metabolism [7, 9]. VAI is supposed to provide a simple proxy measure of functional and structural adiposity; several documents introduced VAI as a surrogate of adipose tissue dysfunction (ATD) [11]. The appropriate age-stratified cut-off points of VAI associated with cardiometabolic risk, validated by Amato et al., are used to identify different states of ATD [12].

Although not established, VAI has been supposed to be a strong predictor of T2D among healthy adults [13,14,15]. Potential predictive values of VAI and ATD status with the progression or regression of Pre-DM remained to be elucidated by population-based studies. To address this knowledge gap, we aimed to assess the possible association of ATD status (estimated by measuring VAI) with the chance of regression to normoglycemia or progression to T2D within nine years, in a cohort of middle-aged Pre-DM men and women, using data from a well-known population-based cohort, the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS). A practical implication of the study finding would be using ATD as a simple and useful index for detecting subjects at a higher risk of Pre-DM progression to T2D, allowing for timely intervention strategies.

Subjects and methods

Study design and population

TLGS study design and population

Details of study design and study population (sample size estimation, sampling methods, study subjects recruitment, baseline assessments and follow-up examinations) have been described previously [16]. The TLGS, an ongoing prospective population-based study performed on a representative sample of the Tehran (the capital of Iran) population, aims to determine the prevalence of and prevents the non-communicable disease (NCD) risk factors [17]. The baseline survey was performed in 1999–2001 (phase one) among more than 15,000 residents (aged ≥ 3 years) of district-13 of Tehran. All measurements were done at baseline and all subsequent examinations with three-y follow-up intervals. The same standard approach was followed for data collection across consecutive examinations of the TLGS.

Current study design and population

The current study used the data from 9645 individuals aging 21 years or older at the third examination of the TLGS (2006–2008). After exclusion of healthy participants (n = 7032), participants with prevalent T2D (n = 480), and those with missing data regarding two-hour post challenge serum glucose (2h-PCSG) (n = 626), anthropometric and lipids (n = 49), 1458 participants diagnosed with Pre-DM remained eligible to be followed within three consecutive phases (phase four: 2009–2011, phase five: 2012–2014, and phase six: 2015–2017) for a median of nine years (see Fig. 1). All of the study participants assigned the informed written consent form. The protocol of current study was conducted based on the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR.SBMU.ENDOCRINE.REC.1402.019).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The study flowchart

Full size image

Assessments of exposure, outcomes, and covariates

Trained interviewers collected the populations’ information using a pretested questionnaire including sociodemographic (e.g. sex, date of birth, smoking status, anthropometric measures, physical activity) and medical data (family history of disease, and medications). Details of anthropometric measurements (i.e., body weight, height, BMI, and waist circumference) [18, 19], measurement of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) [20], physical activity, [21] at baseline (2006–2008) have been reported by the TLGS research group elsewhere. Details of biochemical measurements, including serum glucose concentration, standard 2h-PCSG test, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and serum TG have been described in detail elsewhere [22]. The intra and inter-assay coefficients of variation were both < 5% for the measurements.

We defined VAI as:

$$\mathrm{in}\;\mathrm{Male}=\left(\frac{\mathrm{WC}\left(\mathrm{cm}\right)}{39.68+\left(1.88\times\mathrm{BMI}\right)}\right)\times\left(\frac{\mathrm{TG}\left(\frac{\mathrm{mmol}}{\mathrm L}\right)}{1.03}\right)\times\left(\frac{1.31}{\mathrm{HDL}-\mathrm c\left(\frac{\mathrm{mmol}}{\mathrm L}\right)}\right)$$
$$\mathrm{in}\;\mathrm{Female}=\left(\frac{\mathrm{WC}(\mathrm{cm})}{36.58+\left(1.89\times\mathrm{BMI}\right)}\right)\times\left(\frac{\mathrm{TG}(\frac{\mathrm{mmol}}{\mathrm L})}{0.81}\right)\times\left(\frac{1.52}{\mathrm{HDL}-\mathrm c\left(\frac{\mathrm{mmol}}{\mathrm L}\right)}\right)$$

Assuming VAI = 1 in healthy normal-weight subjects with normal adipose distribution and normal TG and HDL levels [7]. ATD status (i.e., absent, mild-moderate, and severe ATD) was defined based on the age-stratified cutoff values of VAI for cardiometabolic diseases [12].

All Pre-DM subjects were assessed for the occurrence of the outcomes at three-year intervals (2009–2011, 2012–2014, or 2015–2017) during the study follow-up. Having at least one of the IFG (100 ≤ FSG < 126 mg/dL) or IGT (140 ≤ 2 h-SG < 200 mg/dL) was considered as Pre-DM [23]. The first occurrence of both normal fasting glucose (NFG, i.e., FSG < 100 mg/dL) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT, i.e., 2 h-SG < 140 mg/dL) was defined as returning to normal glycemia. Meeting at least one of the following state was defined as T2D: FSG ≥ 126 mg/dL or 2 h-SG ≥ 200 mg/dL, or self-reported use of glucose-lowering medications [23]. Family history of T2D (FHD) was defined as a self-reported positive having at least one parent or sibling with T2D.

Statistical methods

Statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS for Windows version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Findings on covariate variables are expressed as means (SD), median (inter-quartile range, IQR) or percentages for continuously distributed and categorical variables, respectively.

Potential confounding variables were selected from literature [24] and confirmed by the statistical evidence [25]. A univariate analysis was performed for potential confounding variables, and those with PE < 0.2 were selected for the final multivariable model; PE (P-value for entry) determines which variables should be included in the multivariable model [25]. Finally, three models were conducted including age- and sex-adjusted model, and two multivariable adjusted models: second model (additionally adjusted for and FSG and FHD) and third model, additionally adjusted for smoking and physical activity. Because our outcomes are common in the study population (> 10%), the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) derived from the logistic regression can no longer approximate the relative risks (RRs) [26]. The ORs (95% CIs) of the final models were, therefore, converted by the following formula to approximate the RR to adjust for outcomes incidence: RR = OR ÷ [(1-P0) + (P0 × OR)], in which P0 indicates the incidence of the outcome of interest in nonexposed group (i.e., the incidence of the outcome in the mild-intermediate ATD group in this study) [26].

To determine longitudinal changes of glycemic parameters (FSG and 2 h-SG concentrations) over time, and to estimate their cumulative average across ATD status (mid-moderate vs. severe ATD), repeated-measures ANOVA was used.

Results

During a median nine-years follow up of 1458 (mean age of total population: 53.0 ± 13.7, 46.8% men) pre-DM participants of the TLGS, we documented 569 cases with T2D incidence (39.0%) and 549 cases of normoglycemia (37.7%), and 340 (23.3%) subjects were remained Pre-DM. About 55% (n = 802) of the participants were categorized as mild-moderate ATD and 45% (n = 656) as severe ATD at baseline. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the study patients across the outcomes are shown in Table 1. Participants who regressed to normoglycemia during the study follow-up were more likely to be younger, had lower values of BMI, WC, SBP and TG-to-HDL-c ratio, and lower FSG, and 2 h-SG levels. Participants with new onset T2D tended to have higher baseline of VAI compared with those who remained Pre-DM or regressed to normoglycemia (4.0 ± 2.8 vs. 3.6 ± 2.5 and 3.3 ± 2.5, respectively).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants across the final glycemic status (n = 1458)
Full size table

The odds ratio (95% CI) of Pre-DM regression to normal glycemia and progression to T2D in relation to the status of ATD are presented in Table 2. Compared to mild-moderate ATD, Pre-DM subjects who had severe ATD had a higher the risk of developing T2D by 45% (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 11.08–1.93) independent of the well-established risk factors of T2D; the estimated RR from adjusted-OR was 1.15 (95% CI = 1.03–1.31). Conversely, severe ATD significantly decreased chance of returning to normoglycemia by 26% (adjusted-OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.55–0.99; the estimated RR from adjusted OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81–0.99).

Table 2 The odds ratio (95% CI) of prediabetes (Pre-DM) regression to normoglycemia and progression to type 2 diabetes (T2D) in relation to adipose tissue dysfunction (ATD)
Full size table

Table 3 displays the mean (SD) of FSG and 2h-SG concentrations across ATD status during the study follow-up. Trends of FSG and 2h-SG changes over time were significantly different between two levels of ATD (Ptime×group = 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). Participants with severe ATD had a significant higher FSG (overall mean = 111, 95% CI = 109–112 vs. 106, 95% CI = 105–108 mg/dL, P = 0.043) and 2h-SG (overall mean = 165, 95% CI = 161–168 vs. 153, 95% CI = 149–156 mg/dL, P = 0.020) concentrations over time.

Table 3 Mean FSG and 2h-SG concentrations (mg/dL) over 9 years of follow-up across baseline-ATD status
Full size table

Discussion

This study is the first demonstration of the performance of ATD for predicting the risk of developing T2D or the chance of returning to normoglycemia among Pre-diabetics. During a nine-year follow-up within a well-characterized cohort study, we observed that severe ATD (i.e., defined based on age-stratified cutoff values of VAI for cardiometabolic diseases [12]) in the pre-DM subjects significantly reduced their chance of returning to normoglycemia and increased risk of progression to T2D. The Pre-DM subjects with severe ATD, compared to mid-moderate ATD, also experienced worse longitudinal fasting glucose and postprandial glucose tolerance (i.e., measured as repeated FSG and 2h-SG levels during the study with 3-year intervals), glycemic parameters mainly denote pancreatic β-cell function and peripheral insulin sensitivity [27]. The severity of ATD appears to be used by clinicians as a simple and practical measure to pick up and target high-risk subjects to delay and prevent Pre-DM progression. Independent of body weight reduction, redistribution of adipose tissue shifting from visceral to subcutaneous fat and decreased ectopic fat deposition may be a potential therapeutic target for Pre-DM subjects to reduce the risk of T2D [28,29,30]. Pharmaceutical approaches, including treatment with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) agonists like troglitazone, efficiently improve ATD by decreasing visceral and increasing subcutaneous fat [29, 30].

Several underlying mechanisms may link ATD to the development of T2D (Fig. 2). In brief, ATD manifested as fat maldistribution (i.e., increased visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio [31] and accumulated ectopic fat deposition, especially in the pancreas, skeletal muscle, and liver [32,33,34]) and adipose tissue remodeling (e.g., increased macrophage infiltration [35], inadequate vascularization [36, 37], increased collagen deposition and fibrosis [37,38,39], hypoxia [40, 41], altered adipokines and cytokines secretion [42], and mitochondrial dysfunction [43, 44]) leads to a systemic insulin resistance (IR) [45,46,47,48,49,50]. ATD leads to an excessive release of free fatty acids (FFAs), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and pro-inflammatory cytokines to the circulation, resulting in dysfunction of the main organs involved in the whole-body glucose metabolism (i.e., pancreas, liver, and skeletal muscle), leading to impaired insulin secretion (by impairing pancreatic β-cell dysfunction), systemic IR and establishing T2D [47,48,49]. Oxidative stress and specific markers of inflammation mediate, at least partly, the observed association between ATD and progression of Pre-DM since subjects with high-VAI values were found to have higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL‐6), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF‐α), serum amyloid‐A, homocysteine, and fibrinogen [51]. Elevated TNF-α levels lead to IR by inhibiting the expression of genes that are essential for insulin signaling and adipocyte differentiation [i.e., CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein-α, PPAR-g, glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4), insulin receptor substrate-1 protein, adiponectin, and long-chain fatty acid acyl-CoA synthase] [52]. Severe ATD may accelerate the development of IR and T2D [53, 54], probably via overproduction of inflammatory cytokines and adipokines [55]. Excessive visceral adipose tissue accumulation may also increase the risk of IR and T2D via accelerated releasing FFAs [56, 57] and visfatin [58], upregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines, i.e., IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β, as well as disrupting the insulin-signaling pathways [59].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Major underlying mechanisms of dysfunctional adipose tissue leading to development of T2D. Green boxes address main mechanisms leading to systemic IR, and pink boxes underline mechanisms leading to β-cell dysfunction and decreased insulin secretion. Some mechanisms (e.g., those increase circulating FFAs) contribute in pathophysiology of T2D via both inducing IR and impaired insulin secretion. GLUT4, glucose transporter 4; FFA, free fatty acid; IL, interleukin; Mt, mitochondrion; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ; T2D, type 2 diabetes; UCP1, uncoupling protein-1; PGC1α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1-α; DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; ATM, adipose tissue macrophage; β3-AR, β3-adrenergic receptor; SkM, skeletal muscle; TNF-ɑ, tumor necrosis factor-ɑ

Full size image

VAI represents physical and metabolic functions of adipose tissue, including altered production of adipocytokines, increased lipolysis, and plasma free fatty acids, which are not signified by simple anthropometric measures, including BMI, WC, and fat mass [7]. The ability of the VAI to express adipose tissue function goes beyond a hypothesis initially conceptualized based on some simple correlations with adipocytokines production [60, 61]. Of note, VAI outperforms common anthropometric and metabolic measures in predicting the 10‐year risk of T2D in the ATTICA study [51]. VAI values of more than 1.88 increased the risk of developing T2D by two-fold, independent of the well-known risk factors; a 22% elevated 10‐year risk of T2D was shown per one unit of VAI increase at baseline [51]. In a prospective study among the Chinese population, the highest VAI values (> 2.14 compared to < 1.14) increased the four‐year risk of T2D in men by about threefold (HR = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.81–4.48) [62]; VAI could also independently predict five- and 15‐year risk of T2D [63, 64]. Contrary to the BMI, WC, WHR, and WHtR, a direct association between VAI and risk of both pre-diabetes/diabetes was highlighted in a cross-sectional study comprising 2754 Chinese adults, independent of age, lifestyle variables, blood pressure, LDL-c, serum creatinine, serum uric acid levels and inflammatory markers [65]. It has been highlighted that the VAI could considered as an indicator of adipose distribution and function that indirectly expresses cardiometabolic risk and be a useful index for early detection of cardiometabolic risk before its development [11].

The main strength of this prospective study lies in the reliable follow-up in a well-characterized population-based representative sample of Pre-DM subjects in which the outcomes have been documented with standardized measures both at baseline and follow-up examinations and systematically recording the variables required for VAI calculating and completeness of ascertainment and accuracy of ATD classification. However, the findings’ interpretation should be undertaken within the context of the potential limitation of our study. Due to potential changes in dietary intakes and other T2D risk factors during the study follow-up, some degree of misclassification might have occurred, which could lead to biased estimated odds ratios towards the null, as inherent in any prospective study. Furthermore, the association between ATD and Pre-DM progression to T2D may be affected by genetic polymorphisms related to T2D. In our study, we could not perform Mendelian randomization to consider potential genetic variants in relation to ATD and T2D and provide an unbiased ‘causal’ estimate of the effect(s) of severe ATD on the risk of Pre-DM progression. We also could not consider other potential confounding factors, e.g., alcohol consumption, sociodemographic status, and food security, in our statistical models.

In conclusion, our findings suggested that ATD, defined based on the age-stratified cutoff values of VAI as a reliable indicator of visceral fat metabolism, has a predictive performance for future glycemic status of Pre-DM subjects. Severe ATD may increase the risk of Pre-DM progression to T2D and reduce the chance of returning to normoglycemia. ATD may be a simple and practical index for detecting subjects at a higher risk of Pre-DM progression to T2D, allowing for timely intervention strategies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but will be available by the corresponding author (z.bahadoran@endocrine.ac.ir) on reasonable request after confirmation of the director of RIES (azizi@endocrine.ac.ir).

Abbreviations

Pre-DM:

Prediabetes

T2D:

Type2 Diabetes

CI:

Confidence Interval

OR:

Odds Ratio

TLGS:

Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

WC:

Waist Circumference

BMI:

Body Mass Index

SBP:

Systolic Blood Pressure

DBP:

Diastolic Blood Pressure

FSG:

Fasting Serum Glucose

2h-SG:

2-Hour Serum Glucose

IFG:

Impaired Fasting Glucose

IGT:

Impaired Glucose Tolerance

NFG:

Normal Fasting Glucose

NGT:

Normal Glucose Tolerance

TG:

Triglyceride

HDL-c:

High-Density Lipoprotein cholesterol

OGTT:

Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

MAQ:

Modifiable Activity Questionnaire

FFQ:

Food Frequency Questionnaire

RR:

Relative risk

HR:

Hazard ratio

VAI:

Visceral adiposity index

ATD:

Adipose tissue dysfunction

NCD:

Non-communicable disease

FHD:

Family history of T2D

IQR:

Inter-quartile range

CRP:

C-reactive protein

IL‐6:

Interlukine-6

TNF‐α:

Tumor necrosis factor α

References

  1. Rooney MR, Fang M, Ogurtsova K, Ozkan B, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Boyko EJ, Magliano DJ, Selvin EJDC. Global prevalence of prediabetes. Diabetes Care. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-2376:dc222376.10.2337/dc22-2376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DeJesus RS, Breitkopf CR, Rutten LJ, Jacobson DJ, Wilson PM, Sauver JS. Incidence rate of prediabetes progression to diabetes: modeling an optimum target group for intervention. Popul Health Manag. 2017;20(3):216–23. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2016.0067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tabák AG, Herder C, Rathmann W, Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M. Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development. Lancet (London, England). 2012;379(9833):2279–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60283-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Modi A, Gadhavi R, Pérez CM, Joshipura K. Longitudinal association between adiposity measures and regression of prediabetes/diabetes. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;31(11):3085–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2021.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Neeland IJ, Turer AT, Ayers CR, Powell-Wiley TM, Vega GL, Farzaneh-Far R, Grundy SM, Khera A, McGuire DK, de Lemos JA. Dysfunctional adiposity and the risk of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in obese adults. JAMA. 2012;308(11):1150–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.11132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gómez-Ambrosi J, Silva C, Galofré JC, Escalada J, Santos S, Gil MJ, Valentí V, Rotellar F, Ramírez B, Salvador J, et al. Body adiposity and type 2 diabetes: increased risk with a high body fat percentage even having a normal BMI. Obesity. 2011;19(7):1439–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amato MC, Giordano C, Galia M, Criscimanna A, Vitabile S, Midiri M, Galluzzo A. Visceral adiposity index: a reliable indicator of visceral fat function associated with cardiometabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):920–2. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1825.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou C, Zhang Y, Yang S, He P, Wu Q, Ye Z, Liu M, Zhang Y, Li R, Liu C, et al. Associations between visceral adiposity index and incident nephropathy outcomes in diabetic patients: Insights from the ACCORD trial. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2023;39(3): e3602. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou C, Zhang Z, Liu M, Zhang Y, He P, Li Q, Xie D, Liang M, Wang G, Nie J. Association of visceral adiposity index with new-onset type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in hypertensive Chinese adults. Eat Weight Disord-Stud Anorexia, Bulimia Obes. 2022;27:505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01187-4:1-10.10.1007/s40519-021-01187-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mousapour P, Barzin M, Valizadeh M, Mahdavi M, Azizi F, Hosseinpanah F. Predictive performance of lipid accumulation product and visceral adiposity index for renal function decline in non-diabetic adults, an 8.6-year follow-up. Clin Experiment Nephrol. 2020;24(3):225–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-019-01813-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Amato MC, Giordano C. Visceral adiposity index: an indicator of adipose tissue dysfunction. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:730827. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/730827.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Amato MC, Giordano C, Pitrone M, Galluzzo A. Cut-off points of the visceral adiposity index (VAI) identifying a visceral adipose dysfunction associated with cardiometabolic risk in a Caucasian Sicilian population. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:183. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511x-10-183.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bozorgmanesh M, Hadaegh F, Azizi F. Predictive performance of the visceral adiposity index for a visceral adiposity-related risk: type 2 diabetes. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511x-10-88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bagheri A, Khosravy T, Moradinazar M, Nachvak SM, Pasdar Y, Soleimani D, Samadi M. Optimal cut-off points of fat mass index and visceral adiposity index associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Food Sci Nutr. 2022;10(8):2710–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2874.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen C, Xu Y, Guo ZR, Yang J, Wu M, Hu XS. The application of visceral adiposity index in identifying type 2 diabetes risks based on a prospective cohort in China. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13:108. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511x-13-108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Shabani M, Azizi F. Higher daily physical activity levels may facilitate pre-diabetes regression to normoglycemia: a longitudinal study among an Iranian population. Prev Med Rep. 2023;34:102233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Azizi F, Zadeh-Vakili A, Takyar M. Review of rationale, design, and initial findings: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;16(4 Suppl):e84777. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.84777.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Naseri P, Amiri P, Masihay-Akbar H, Jalali-Farahani S, Khalili D, Azizi F. Long-term incidence of cardiovascular outcomes in the middle-aged and elderly with different patterns of physical activity: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09747-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheikholeslami S, Ghanbarian A, Azizi F. The impact of physical activity on non-communicable diseases: findings from 20 years of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;16(4 Suppl):e84740. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.84740.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Askari S, Asghari G, Ghanbarian A, Khazan M, Alamdari S, Azizi F. Seasonal variations of blood pressure in adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Arch Iranian Med. 2014;17(6):441–3 014176/aim.0012.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Momenan AA, Delshad M, Sarbazi N, Rezaei Ghaleh N, Ghanbarian A, Azizi F. Reliability and validity of the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ) in an Iranian urban adult population. Arch Iran Med. 2012;15(5):279–82. https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.151433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tohidi M, Ghasemi A, Hadaegh F, Derakhshan A, Chary A, Azizi F. Age- and sex-specific reference values for fasting serum insulin levels and insulin resistance/sensitivity indices in healthy Iranian adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Clin Biochem. 2014;47(6):432–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.02.007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. American Diabetes A. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S15–33. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alizadeh Z, Baradaran HR, Kohansal K, Hadaegh F, Azizi F, Khalili D. Are the determinants of the progression to type 2 diabetes and regression to normoglycemia in the populations with pre-diabetes the same? Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:1041808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1041808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Cook E: Applied logistic regression 2nd edition, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013.

  26. Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280(19):1690–1. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.19.1690.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Faerch K, Borch-Johnsen K, Holst JJ, Vaag A. Pathophysiology and aetiology of impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance: does it matter for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes? Diabetologia. 2009;52(9):1714–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1443-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang X, Smith U. Adipose tissue distribution and risk of metabolic disease: does thiazolidinedione-induced adipose tissue redistribution provide a clue to the answer? Diabetologia. 2007;50(6):1127–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-007-0640-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Akazawa S, Sun F, Ito M, Kawasaki E, Eguchi K. Efficacy of troglitazone on body fat distribution in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(8):1067–71. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.8.1067.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mori Y, Murakawa Y, Okada K, Horikoshi H, Yokoyama J, Tajima N, Ikeda Y. Effect of troglitazone on body fat distribution in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(6):908–12. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.6.908.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim EH, Kim HK, Lee MJ, Bae SJ, Choe J, Jung CH, Kim CH, Park JY, Lee WJ. Sex differences of visceral fat area and visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio for the risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2022;46(3):486–98. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2021.0095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Okamura T, Hashimoto Y, Hamaguchi M, Obora A, Kojima T, Fukui M. Ectopic fat obesity presents the greatest risk for incident type 2 diabetes: a population-based longitudinal study. Int J Obes (2005). 2019;43(1):139–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0076-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamazaki H, Tauchi S, Machann J, Haueise T, Yamamoto Y, Dohke M, Hanawa N, Kodama Y, Katanuma A, Stefan N, et al. Fat distribution patterns and future type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2022;71(9):1937–45. https://doi.org/10.2337/db22-0315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Heilbronn L, Smith SR, Ravussin E. Failure of fat cell proliferation, mitochondrial function and fat oxidation results in ectopic fat storage, insulin resistance and type II diabetes mellitus. Int J Obes. 2004;28(4):S12–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802853.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Appari M, Channon KM, McNeill E. Metabolic regulation of adipose tissue macrophage function in obesity and diabetes. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;29(3):297–312. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7060.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sung HK, Doh KO, Son JE, Park JG, Bae Y, Choi S, Nelson SML, Cowling R, Nagy K, Iacovos MP, et al. Adipose vascular endothelial growth factor regulates metabolic homeostasis through angiogenesis. Cell Metab. 2013;17(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Spencer M, Unal R, Zhu B, Rasouli N, McGehee RE Jr, Peterson CA, Kern PA. Adipose tissue extracellular matrix and vascular abnormalities in obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(12):E1990-1998. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-1567.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pasarica M, Gowronska-Kozak B, Burk D, Remedios I, Hymel D, Gimble J, Ravussin E, Bray GA, Smith SR. Adipose tissue collagen VI in obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(12):5155–62. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-0947.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Spencer M, Yao-Borengasser A, Unal R, Rasouli N, Gurley CM, Zhu B, Peterson CA, Kern PA. Adipose tissue macrophages in insulin-resistant subjects are associated with collagen VI and fibrosis and demonstrate alternative activation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010;299(6):E1016-1027. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00329.2010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rasouli N. Adipose tissue hypoxia and insulin resistance. J Investig Med. 2016;64(4):830–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/jim-2016-000106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mazzatti D, Lim F-L, O’Hara A, Wood IS, Trayhurn P. A microarray analysis of the hypoxia-induced modulation of gene expression in human adipocytes. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2012;118(3):112–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee MW, Lee M, Oh KJ. Adipose tissue-derived signatures for obesity and type 2 diabetes: Adipokines, Batokines and MicroRNAs. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):854. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060854.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Koh EH, Park JY, Park HS, Jeon MJ, Ryu JW, Kim M, Kim SY, Kim MS, Kim SW, Park IS, et al. Essential role of mitochondrial function in adiponectin synthesis in adipocytes. Diabetes. 2007;56(12):2973–81. https://doi.org/10.2337/db07-0510.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Choo HJ, Kim JH, Kwon OB, Lee CS, Mun JY, Han SS, Yoon YS, Yoon G, Choi KM, Ko YG. Mitochondria are impaired in the adipocytes of type 2 diabetic mice. Diabetologia. 2006;49(4):784–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0170-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Guglielmi V, Cardellini M, Cinti F, Corgosinho F, Cardolini I, D’Adamo M, Zingaretti MC, Bellia A, Lauro D, Gentileschi P, et al. Omental adipose tissue fibrosis and insulin resistance in severe obesity. Nutr Diabetes. 2015;5(8):e175–e175. https://doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2015.22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Guilherme A, Virbasius JV, Puri V, Czech MP. Adipocyte dysfunctions linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(5):367–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Colleluori G, Perugini J. From obesity to diabetes: the role of the adipose organ. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2022;274:75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2021_572.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ahmed B, Sultana R, Greene MW. Adipose tissue and insulin resistance in obese. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;137:111315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kawai T, Autieri MV, Scalia R. Adipose tissue inflammation and metabolic dysfunction in obesity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2021;320(3):C375-c391. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00379.2020.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Santoro A, Kahn BB. Adipocyte regulation of insulin sensitivity and the risk of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(22):2071–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Koloverou E, Panagiotakos DB, Kyrou I, Stefanadis C, Chrysohoou C, Georgousopoulou EN, Skoumas I, Tousoulis D, Pitsavos C. group tAS: Visceral adiposity index outperforms common anthropometric indices in predicting 10-year diabetes risk: results from the ATTICA study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019;35(6): e3161. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ruan H, Hacohen N, Golub TR, Van Parijs L, Lodish HFJD. Tumor necrosis factor-α suppresses adipocyte-specific genes and activates expression of preadipocyte genes in 3T3-L1 adipocytes: nuclear factor-κB activation by TNF-α is obligatory. Diabetes. 2002;51(5):1319–36. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.5.1319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Qatanani M, Lazar MAJG. development: mechanisms of obesity-associated insulin resistance: many choices on the menu. Genes Dev. 2007;21(12):1443–55. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1550907.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Savage DB, Petersen KF, Shulman GI. Disordered lipid metabolism and the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(2):507–20. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00024.2006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Fontana L, Eagon JC, Trujillo ME, Scherer PE, Klein SJD. Visceral fat adipokine secretion is associated with systemic inflammation in obese humans. Diabetes. 2007;56(4):1010–3. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-1656.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Boden G, Shulman GI. Free fatty acids in obesity and type 2 diabetes: defining their role in the development of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction. Eur J Clin Invest. 2002;32:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2362.32.s3.3.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Bergmann K, Sypniewska G. Medicine L: Diabetes as a complication of adipose tissue dysfunction. Is there a role for potential new biomarkers? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(1):177–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2012-0490.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sonoli S, Shivprasad S, Prasad C, Patil A, Desai P, Somannavar MS. Visfatin-a review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011;15(1):9–14 PMID: 21381495.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Heo YJ, Choi S-E, Jeon JY, Han SJ, Kim DJ, Kang Y, Lee KW, Kim HJ. Visfatin induces inflammation and insulin resistance via the NF-κB and STAT3 signaling pathways in hepatocytes. J Diabetes Res. 2019;2019:4021623. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4021623.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Al-Daghri NM, Al-Attas OS, Alokail MS, Alkharfy KM, Charalampidis P, Livadas S, Kollias A, Sabico SL, Chrousos GP. Visceral adiposity index is highly associated with adiponectin values and glycaemic disturbances. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013;43(2):183–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12030.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ciresi A, Amato MC, Pizzolanti G, Giordano Galluzzo C. Visceral adiposity index is associated with insulin sensitivity and adipocytokine levels in newly diagnosed acromegalic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(8):2907–15. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-1518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang M, Zheng L, Li P, Zhu Y, Chang H, Wang X, Liu W, Zhang Y, Huang G. 4-year trajectory of visceral adiposity index in the development of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Ann Nutr Metab. 2016;69(2):142–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000450657.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Yang J, Wang F, Wang J, Han X, Hu H, Yu C, Yuan J, Yao P, Miao X, Wei S, et al. Using different anthropometric indices to assess prediction ability of type 2 diabetes in elderly population: a 5 year prospective study. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):218. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0912-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang Y, He S, He J, Wang S, Liu K, Chen X. Predictive value of visceral adiposity index for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 15-year prospective cohort study. Herz. 2015;40(Suppl 3):277–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-014-4175-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Liu PJ, Ma F, Lou HP, Chen Y. Visceral adiposity index is associated with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese adults aged 20–50. Ann Nutr Metab. 2016;68(4):235–43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000446121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study participants and the field investigators of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study for their cooperation and assistance in physical examinations, biochemical evaluation and database management. The study was supported by the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Grant No. 43005586).

Funding

This work was not supported by any funding agency.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mohammad Jalali and Zahra Bahadoran equally by the first author.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nutrition and Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, No 23, A’rabi St, Yeman Av, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Jalali, Zahra Bahadoran & Parvin Mirmiran

  2. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Mohammad Jalali

  3. Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Parvin Mirmiran

  4. Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Fereidoun Azizi

  5. Obesity Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Farhad Hosseinpanah

Authors
  1. Mohammad Jalali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zahra Bahadoran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Parvin Mirmiran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fereidoun Azizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Farhad Hosseinpanah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.B. and M.J. designed the study and analyzed the data. Z.B and M.J. wrote the manuscript. P.M, F.H. and F.A supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Bahadoran.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The ethics research committee of the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, approved the study protocol (IR.SBMU.ENDOCRINE.REC.1402.019). The study protocol was carried out according to the relevant guidelines expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jalali, M., Bahadoran, Z., Mirmiran, P. et al. Severity of adipose tissue dysfunction is associated with progression of pre-diabetes to type 2 diabetes: the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. BMC Public Health 24, 121 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17381-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17381-1

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us