Skip to main content

Health-related quality of life of children from low-income families: the new patterns study

Abstract

Background

Child poverty has been gradually rising, and about 12% of all Norwegian children are living in a state of relative poverty. This study was part of the New Patterns project, which recruits low-income families requiring long-term welfare services. Included families receive integrated welfare services, with the help of a family coordinator. The current study objectives were to explore the associations between HRQoL, demographic variables (age, gender, immigration status) and leisure activities in children and adolescents in low-income families.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among low-income families. Participating families had children (N = 214) aged 8–18 years.The family had a household income below 60% of the equivalized median population income for three consecutive years and needed long-term welfare services. HRQoL was measured using the KIDSCREEN-27 self-report instrument. Descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, and proportions, were calculated, and ordinary least squares regressions were performed, clustering standard errors at the family level.

Results

Compared with boys, girls reported lower HRQoL on only one out of five dimensions, physical wellbeing. In the regression analysis we found statistically significant positive associations between migrant status and HRQoL on all five dimensions: physical wellbeing, psychological wellbeing, parents and autonomy, peers and social support, and school environment. In addition, age was associated with school environment, and age, gender and participation in leisure activities was associated with better physical wellbeing.

Conclusions

Baseline results regarding HRQoL among children and adolescents in low-income families indicate that they have overall good HRQoL, though some participants had low HRQoL scores, especially on the physical and social support dimensions. Children with an immigrant background report higher HRQoL than do children without an immigrant background.

Peer Review reports

Background

In recent years, gradually rising child poverty has become a cause for concern [1,2,3]. Compared with other countries, Norway has a low poverty rate. However, an increasing number of Norwegian children are growing up in poverty, as the country’s child poverty rate has tripled since 2001 [1]. About 12% of all Norwegian children now live in a state of relative poverty [3]. For some groups of immigrants, the risk of long-term poverty is more than 50% [1]. Particularly concerning are families because the increased poverty rate is more prevalent among them compared with the general population, and because children’s consequences may be significant [4]. In the recent report of health in inequalities in Norway, the needs of children of immigrants, and those in poverty is highlighted [5].

A longitudinal Norwegian study of intergenerational mobility demonstrated that children born into the lowest decile of the parental earnings rankings have fallen behind in several outcome dimensions [6]. This effect reflects employment, net household income, health (measured by disability program participation), family formation (for men), and mortality. Poverty affects the family as a whole and may have serious consequences for children, such as an increased risk of social marginalization and their own experience of poverty as adults [4]. Moreover, an extensive literature reports the negative health effects of poverty [7, 8]. For instance, a longitudinal study of adolescents in 34 countries indicated that those from low socioeconomic families are more affected by psychological and physical symptoms [9]. Poverty is also the most important social determinant of child health in high-income countries [10], and influences children’s health—largely indirectly, through adverse effects on their physical surroundings and psychosocial experiences [11, 12]. Accumulated poverty over time may result in adverse health outcomes [13, 14].

Leisure activities may be an important arena in children’s and adolescents’ lives. Adolescents of low socioeconomic status (SES) have been found to participate in fewer leisure activities compared to adolescents of high SES [15]. Participating in physical recreational activities has been shown to be related to better health and lower levels of depression and anxiety [16] Studying health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important as it may provide a broad view of the impacts of poverty on child health [17,18,19]. HRQoL aims to assess various aspects of children’s health and well-being and has been described as “a multidimensional construct covering physical, emotional, social, and behavioral components of subjective well-being and functioning” [20]. The multidimensionality of the HRQoL concept provides researchers and practitioners with information about the multiple impacts of poverty and may serve as a framework for identifying and developing strategies to promote HRQoL [21]. The World Health Organization emphasizes well-being and HRQoL as public health goals and highlights child health and well-being as essential for healthier, more sustainable societies [17, 22, 23].

Relations between socioeconomic status (SES) and HRQoL are well established, with studies consistently demonstrating that low SES is related to low HRQoL [24,25,26,27,28,29]. A recent study from the Netherlands found that poverty at birth and/or cumulative poverty is associated with a significantly increased risk of lower HRQoL in children [10]. Different factors linking SES to HRQoL have been discussed, including differences in access to material and social resources and reactions to family stress [24]. Nevertheless, few studies have explored the dimensions of HRQoL among children living in poverty One reason for this is that compared with higher-income families, those living in poverty are less likely to participate in research and community programs [30].

The study described herein was part of the New Patterns project, which recruits low-income families requiring long-term welfare services. Participating families receive integrated services through a family coordinator across multiple sectors (culture, education, welfare, health, and social services), and volunteer organizations, supporting all family members for five years [31]. Studying the HRQoL of children growing up in poverty can provide important information for practice and policymakers and enhance the understanding of which aspects is relevant to health and HRQoL, especially for improving child well-being and reducing social inequity. Based on earlier research and literature, we focused on demographic variables, leisure activities in relation to HRQoL. The objectives of this study were to explore the associations between HRQoL, demographic variables (age, gender, immigration status) and leisure activities in children and adolescents in low-income families.

Methods

Study sample

The current cross-sectional study included 214 children (from 123 families) aged 8–18 years, mean age 12 years. The New Patterns project details, including recruitment and methodology, have been previously described [31]. Briefly, families were recruited through referrals from different service sectors within the municipalities. Eligible families had a household income below 60% of the equivalized median population income for three consecutive years and need for long-term welfare services. Participating families live in both urban and rural municipalities in southwestern Norway. Most of these participants (70%) enrolled in 2019 or 2020. Though project recruitment is ongoing, this study included only children who had enrolled by May 13, 2022.

Data description

Families participating in the New Patterns project undergo a mapping process with a family coordinator, in close collaboration with all family members. Though mapping is repeated yearly, this study included only baseline results (i.e., within the first year of enrollment). Mapping details have also been reported by Mølland et al. (2021) [31]).

Measurements

All background characteristics are measured at New Patterns project enrollment. The children answer the self-report questionnaires at home. The family coordinator is present and can answer questions if needed.

Demographic variables. The first part of the questionnaire included questions regarding demographic data, such as gender, age, parents education and immigration background and reason for immigration. Parental education is classified as the highest level of education completed by the mother and/or father at enrollment. Low education level means that neither parent (s) has completed more than mandatory education (10 years in Norway). Children categorized as having an immigrant background had either themselves immigrated to Norway or were born in Norway to a parent or parents who had immigrated there. Children born in Norway whose parents did not have an immigrant background were defined as having nonimmigrant background.

HRQoL was measured using the KIDSCREEN-27 self-report instrument [17], which was completed by each participating child. The KIDSCREEN-27 assess the subjective health and the psychological, mental, and social well-being (HRQoL) of children and adolescents between the ages of 8 and 18. The instrument assesses 5 dimensions : physical well-being (five items), psychological well-being (seven items), autonomy and parent relation (seven items), social support and peers (four items), and school environment (four items). Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale referring to the past week, indicating either the intensity of an attitude or the frequency of a behavior or feeling. For example, the physical well-being dimension item “When thinking about the last week, have you been able to run well?” is rated using a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). Consistent with the KIDSCREEN manual, a scoring algorithm was used to convert the raw scores into T-scores [32]. Rasch scores are computed for each subscale and transformed into t-values normed to a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 50 (10), which can be compared with international t-values [32]. If at least one item per dimension was left unanswered, the overall dimension score was identified as missing. Higher T-scores reflect better HRQoL. The Norwegian version has been shown to be valid and reliable [33].

Participation in leisure activities was measured with following item: Do you participate in organized free-time activities today? With yes or no as answer categories.

Analysis

Data were analyzed using Stata 17 (Stata Corp. 2019, Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX, USA). Descriptive statistics, including means, SD, and fractions, were calculated. Age was grouped into two groups 8–11 and 12–18 in line with the recommendations from the KiDSCREEN group [32]. Differences in means were tested using standard t tests, assuming unequal variances. To explore relationships between HRQoL scores (dependent variables) and independent variables, age, gender demographic background and participation in leisure activities, ordinary least squares regressions were performed, clustering standard errors at the family level.

Ethics

Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and informed consent was obtained from the parents of children younger than age 16 years. The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Ethics Committee West (reference no. 249,507) and conducted according to recommendations from the Norwegian Data Protection Services (file no. 27,435).

Results

Table 1 presents the 214 participants’ descriptive characteristics, including age, gender, and parental sociodemographics. Among the overall sample, girls were slightly overrepresented (54%), the mean age was 12 years, 68% had an immigrant background, 42% had parents who were married or cohabiting, and 58% had parents with low education. A large proportion of participants had parents who were not currently participating in the workforce (74%).

Table 1 Sample characteristics (N = 214)

Figure 1 shows a boxplot of the mean HRQoL scores for the five HRQoL domains for this sample, and European reference norms [32]. The plots indicate that the sample’s mean scores are close to European norms. The highest mean scores were for the domains of peer relationships and social support (mean 50.5, SD 12.3) and school environment (mean 52.4, SD 10.4), consistent with normative data. The lowest HRQoL score was for the physical well-being dimension. Although the mean scores were high for nearly all dimensions, there was a substantial range and variation within each dimension.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mean self-reported health-related quality of life

Note: Boxplot of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) dimensions. The boxes show the borders of the 25th and 75th percentiles for the T-scores of each HRQoL dimension. + indicates the mean T-score of each HRQoL dimension. Horizontal bold lines represent median T-scores for each HRQoL dimension. The gray line indicates the mean reference population T-score (50). Whiskers illustrate the lowest and highest T-scores, excluding outliers. Black dots outside whiskers represent outliers

Table 2 presents the mean HRQoL scores and mean differences for age groups and gender. Age was grouped into categories: 8–11 years and 12–18 years. Children in the older group reported significantly lower HRQoL levels on the dimensions of physical well-being (mean difference 6.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.13, 9.42) and school environment (mean difference 3.59; 95% CI 0.74, 6.44). The lowest HRQoL scores were reported for children in the older age group, on physical well-being (mean 46.50, SD 11.97).

Table 2 Mean self-reported health-related quality of life by age group and gender

Table 3 provides HRQoL information about children with and without an immigrant background and about participation in leisure activities. Children with an immigrant background reported higher HRQoL levels than children without an immigrant background on the dimensions: physical well-being (mean difference − 5.37; 95% CI − 8.58, − 2.25); psychological well-being (mean difference − 5.03; 95% CI − 8.06, − 2.00); parents and autonomy (mean difference − 3.44; 95% CI − 6.05, − 0.83); and school environment (mean difference − 5.19; 95% CI − 8.27, − 2.12).

Table 3 Mean self-reported health-related quality of life by immigrant status and participation in leisure activities

Children who participate in leisure activities reported higher levels of HRQoL on all dimensions, with significantly higher ratings on physical well-being (mean difference − 5.74; 95% CI − 8.92, − 2.56); psychological well-being (mean difference − 3.53; 95% CI − 6.47, − 0.57); parents and autonomy (mean difference − 2.68; 95% CI -5.32,-0.03).

Regression analysis was conducted to describe the relations between the independent variables and the dependent variables, the five HRQoL dimensions (Table 4). Models were adjusted for age, gender, participation in leisure activities, and immigrant background. Having an immigrant background was positively associated with all five HRQoL dimensions (i.e., physical well-being, psychological well-being, parents and autonomy, peers and social support, and school environment—indicating that children with immigrant backgrounds reported higher HRQoL than did children without an immigrant background. Age was negatively associated with the physical well-being and school environment dimensions.

Table 4 Regression results for health-related quality of life outcomes

Discussion

These HRQoL results from children and adolescents in low-income families indicate that they have good overall HRQoL, with scores close to the average scores reported in previous national and European studies using the HRQoL instrument [17]. However, there were age and gender differences, as well as differences between children with and without immigrant background, and between those who participate and not participate in leisure activities.

A main study finding was the difference in HRQoL scores between participants with and without an immigrant background. The former reported significantly higher HRQoL than the latter on all five HRQoL dimensions physical and psychological well-being, parents and autonomy, peers and social support and school environment. Some earlier studies have indicated that a migration background can be a risk factor for health problems and low HRQoL [21, 33]. However, results have varied in the literature, with some studies indicating more similarities, and even higher mental health scores and HRQoL, among immigrant children compared with their nonimmigrant peers [34,35,36,37]. This variation has also been documented across ethnic groups [37]. In a German study, young children with an immigrant background reported higher HRQoL scores than did nonimmigrant children [38, 39]. Though it assessed both children and adults, one previous Norwegian study reported lower use of specialist mental service among immigrants compared with nonimmigrants [39]. Likewise, a recent study from Germany showed that children with low SES, low parental education, and a migrant status reported significantly lower HRQoL than did children without an immigrant background [40]. These inconsistencies suggest that such relations are highly complex.

The HRQoL differences between nonimmigrant and immigrant children from low-income families herein may be related to methodological challenges, including problems with survey completion because of language or cultural problems. However, differences may also be related to levels of family complexity [41]. Previous research has indicated that poverty can last across generations and that family characteristics can affect children over time, such as poor-quality parenting related to economic stress or parental health problems [8]. Children with a nonimmigrant background who grow up in poor families may therefore inherit less favorable family environments and experience more stigma related to their family situations [42, 43]. It should be noted that most families participating in our study that have a nonimmigrant background, also have at least one parent who is unable to work for different reason, such as health problems and disability. Another potential explanation for HRQoL differences may be that adolescents with an immigrant background experience less pressure from social referencing [44].

The HRQoL results in our study are in line with those of a recent study of adolescents from the general population in the same region of Norway [45]. We also found that younger children reported higher HRQoL than did older children, consistent with earlier findings that HRQoL is associated with age (i.e., older children report lower HRQoL than younger children) and gender (boys report higher HRQoL than girls) [21, 28, 46]. In general, our study participants had HRQoL scores close to the normative data on most dimensions. However, some participants had lower HRQoL than the European norms—especially on the physical and social support dimensions [32]. This is in line with a recent study from the Netherlands showing that children born into poverty have low physical HRQoL [47].

Herein, the lowest HRQoL scores were reported by the older children (12–18 years) on the physical well-being dimension, which was also more prevalent in girls than in boys. The physical well-being dimension explores children’s perceptions of their physical activity, health, and vitality [17] so that low scores indicate more impaired physical functioning. Children from poor families are more likely to develop a variety of health conditions. Unstable, low family income can lead to increased stress in the family and a lack of predictability [43]. In a systematic review, different mechanisms relating child poverty to health and well-being highlighted the importance of access to both material and social resources and child reactions to stress-inducing conditions [43]. The chronic stress of living in poverty can cause toxic stress [48], to which children may respond when they experience the accumulated burdens of family economic difficulties without adequate support [42, 49]. Children may express stress as complaints like headache and feeling in poor health [21, 50]. This stress experience, over time, may partly explain their low physical dimension score in this study.

Our results also show that children who participate in leisure activities report higher physical well-being dimension scores than those who do not. Participating in a variety of leisure activities can contribute positively to HRQoL in children by promoting physical health, emotional well-being, social development which is shown in previous studies [16, 51, 52], including a recent report on schoolchildren from a socioeconomically deprived area of England among whom there was a positive association between participation in leisure activities and HRQoL [51]. These findings may support the positive link between leisure activity engagement and HRQoL, though causality remains unclear.

Strengths and limitations

The main study strength was its recruitment of children from low-income families who are less likely to participate in research and community programs, thereby describing an often-underrepresented population. We also recruited children with and without an immigrant background, using a validated HRQoL instrument. The findings should nevertheless be interpreted within the context of its limitations. The cross-sectional design disallows deducing causal relations; thus, longitudinal follow-up will be valuable.

Conclusions

Baseline results regarding HRQoL among children and adolescents participating in an intervention targeting low-income families indicate that they have overall good HRQoL, though some participants had low HRQoL scores, especially on the physical and social support dimensions. Children with an immigrant background report higher HRQoL than do children without an immigrant background. HRQoL information in children from low-income families is vital for clinical practice and policy, especially toward improving child well-being.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed for this study are not publicly available, due to regulation by the Norwegian Data Protection Authority, but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

SD:

Standard deviation

HRQoL:

Health-related Quality of Life

References

  1. Statistics Norway. S 09571: Development in persistent low income. Three-year period. Children under 18 years, by age group and county (per cent) (C) 2006-2008-2016–2018https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/table/09571/tableViewLayout1/

  2. UNICEF., Building the Future. Children and Sustainable Development Goals in Rich countries., in UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti. Italy. 2017.

  3. Bufdir., bufdir.nohttps://www.bufdir.no/Statistics_andanalysis/child_poverty low-income-(2017) (2020, accessed 2022).

  4. Fløtten T. S.G.A., Comprehensive measures against child poverty, A review of previous research. FAFO Report. 2014.

  5. Goldblatt P, Allen CA, Lionello J, BellR R, Heimburg D, Ness O, Marmot M. Rapid review of inequalities in health and wellbeing in Norway since 2014. 2023, Institute of Health equity: NTNU.

  6. Markussen S, Røed K. Economic mobility under pressure. J Eur Econ Assoc. 2019;18(4):1844–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roos LL, Wall-Wieler E, Lee JB. Poverty and Early Childhood Outcomes Pediatrics. 2019.

  8. Kim L, Schmidt SMM, Randip Gill GE, Miller AM, Gadermann MS. Kobor, Society to cell: how child poverty gets under the skin to influence child development and lifelong health. Dev Rev. 2021;61.

  9. Elgar FJ, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent health 2002–2010: a time-series analysis of 34 countries participating in the Health Behaviour in School-aged children study. Lancet. 2015;385(9982):2088–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang-Huang J et al. Changes in Family Poverty Status and Child Health. Pediatrics. 2021.

  11. Dearing E. Psychological costs of growing up poor. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:324–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan GJ, Morris PA, Rodrigues C. Does money really matter? Estimating impacts of family income on young children’s achievement with data from random-assignment experiments. Dev Psychol. 2011;47(5):1263–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Benzeval M, Green MJ, Leyland AH. Do social inequalities in health widen or converge with age? Longitudinal evidence from three cohorts in the West of Scotland. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:947.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Green MJ, et al. Timing of poverty in childhood and adolescent health: evidence from the US and UK. Soc Sci Med. 2018;197:136–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobsen SEA, Nordø PL, Sletten AD, Arnesen M. Social unequality in children and adolescents and participitation in leisure activities. Forskning på Sivilsamfunn og Fivillig Sektor: Bergen. 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Valstad Aasan B, Krokstad LM, Sylte S, Sund M. The relative importance of Family, School, and leisure activities for the Mental Wellbeing of adolescents: the Young-HUNT Study in Norway. Societies. 2023;13(4):93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ravens-Sieberer U, et al. The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(3):791–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ravens-Sieberer U, et al. Subjective health, symptom load and quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(Suppl 2):151–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haverman L, et al. Paediatric health-related quality of life: what is it and why should we measure it? Arch Dis Child. 2017;102(5):393–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravens-Sieberer U, et al. Measuring subjective health in children and adolescents: results of the European KIDSCREEN/DISABKIDS project. Psychosoc Med. 2007;4:Doc08.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Otto C, et al. Risk and protective factors of health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: results of the longitudinal BELLA study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0190363.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cusack C. Sustainable development and quality of life. Springer. 2019.

  23. Programme. UND. Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2019: Illuminating Inequalities.” OPHI Report. Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) in Human Development Report, Oxford Poverty, and Human Development Initiative. 2019: Oxford.

  24. von Rueden U, et al. Socioeconomic determinants of health related quality of life in childhood and adolescence: results from a European study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(2):130–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Drukker M, Feron FJ, van Os J. Income inequality at neighbourhood level and quality of life–a contextual analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004;39(6):457–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pearce A, Lewis H, Law C. The role of poverty in explaining health variations in 7-year-old children from different family structures: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(2):181–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Petersen-Ewert C, Erhart M, Ravens-Sieberer U. Assessing health-related quality of life in European children and adolescents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(8):1752–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reiss F, et al. Socioeconomic status, stressful life situations and mental health problems in children and adolescents: results of the German BELLA cohort-study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0213700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Johansson LM et al. Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1): p. 33.

  30. De Weger E, et al. They need to ask me first’. Community Engagement with low-income citizens. A realist qualitative case-study. Health Expect. 2022;25(2):684–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mølland E, et al. The new patterns study: coordinated measures to combat child poverty. Scand J Public Health. 2021;49(5):571–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. The KIDSCREEN, Group E. The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires - Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents Handbook. 2006: Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

  33. Andersen JR, et al. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Kidscreen-27 questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. deKeyser L, et al. Multi-informant reports of mental health in Swedish-born children of immigrants and children born to non-immigrants - the SESBiC-study. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Belhadj Kouider E, Koglin U, Petermann F. Emotional and behavioral problems in migrant children and adolescents in Europe: a systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;23(6):373–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmengler H, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent health behaviours across 32 different countries - the role of country-level social mobility. Soc Sci Med. 2022;310:115289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stevens GW, Vollebergh WA. Mental health in migrant children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49(3):276–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Villalonga-Olives E, et al. Health related quality of life of immigrant children: towards a new pattern in Germany? BMC Public Health. 2014;14:790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Abebe DS, Lien L, Elstad JI. Immigrants’ utilization of specialist mental healthcare according to age, country of origin, and migration history: a nation-wide register study in Norway. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52(6):679–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ravens-Sieberer U, et al. Mental Health and Quality of Life in Children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic-results of the Copsy Study. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(48):828–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Rijlaarsdam J, et al. Economic disadvantage and Young Children’s emotional and behavioral problems: mechanisms of risk. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013;41(1):125–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Garner PW. Children’s emotional responsiveness and sociomoral understanding and associations with mothers’ and fathers’ Socialization practices. Infant Ment Health J. 2012;33(1):95–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hertzman C, Boyce T. How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:329 – 47 3p following 347.

  44. Högberg B, Strandh M, Hagquist C. Gender and Secular trends in adolescent mental health over 24 years - the role of school-related stress. Soc Sci Med. 2020;250:112890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mikkelsen HT, et al. Health-related quality of life is strongly associated with self-efficacy, self-esteem, loneliness, and stress in 14-15-year-old adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Otto C, et al. Mental health and well-being from childhood to adulthood: design, methods and results of the 11-year follow-up of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;30(10):1559–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang-Huang J et al. Changes in Family Poverty Status and Child Health. Pediatrics. 2021;147(4).

  48. Santiago CD, et al. Predictors of responses to stress among families coping with poverty-related stress. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2012;25(3):239–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shonkoff JP, Garner AS. The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1):e232–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen E. Why Socioeconomic Status affects the health of children:a psychosocial perspective. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2004;13(3):112–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Basterfield L, et al. The association between physical fitness, sports club participation and body mass index on health-related quality of life in primary school children from a socioeconomically deprived area of England. Prev Med Rep. 2021;24:101557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Eddolls WTB, et al. The association between physical activity, fitness and body mass index on mental well-being and quality of life in adolescents. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(9):2313–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participating families, municipalities, and family coordinators for their commitment to the New Patterns project.

Funding

The study was supported by the Norwegian Research Council (Grant # 295686).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EM, EA, and KLV initiated the New Patterns project. KLV was the project manager who implemented the New Patterns project. All authors (KH, EA, TB, KLV, PW, and EM) contributed to the study design and implementation. KH and EM wrote the first manuscript draft. All authors revised and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Haraldstad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Ethics Committee West (reference no. 249507) and conducted according to recommendations from the Norwegian Data Protection Services (file no. 27435). Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and informed consent was obtained from the parents of children younger than age 16 years. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haraldstad, K., Abildsnes, E., Bøe, T. et al. Health-related quality of life of children from low-income families: the new patterns study. BMC Public Health 23, 2439 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17335-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17335-7

Keywords