Skip to main content

The role of military service in preventing depression in China: evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey

Background

Despite recognition in the West that military veterans experience more mental health issues than the general population, little research has focused on this subject in China. This study examined the associations between male veterans’ military experience and depression in China.

Methods

A sample of 12,914 men including 669 veterans was included in the final analysis and propensity score matching, multivariable regressions and fixed effect model were used.

Results

The military experience was associated with a lower likelihood of depression in male veterans. In the subgroup analysis, military experience was associated with a lower likelihood of depression among married and urban male veterans. Military experience was also associated with a lower likelihood of depression in both “junior college and above” and “below junior college” groups. In contrast, evidence was lacking regarding the associations between military experience and depression for unmarried and rural veterans.

Conclusions

Individual characteristics could influence the relationship between military experience and depression in male veterans, and the mental health of veterans should be paid more attention and guaranteed.

Peer Review reports

Background

Veterans are vulnerable to mental health issues [1, 2]. According to existing research, veterans often exhibit higher morbidity of mental diseases than civilians, including depression and anxiety. Moreover, they are also more likely to commit suicide than the average person [3]. In the UK, veterans presented significantly higher rates of common mental disorders than the general population (23% vs. 16%); specifically, they had a 15–31% chance of being diagnosed with PTSD compared to 2–3% among the general population [1, 4,5,6]. Other studies have also found that depressive disorders constitute the most common mental health issues among veterans in the UK [7]. In the US, the incidence rates of mental health issues among adults were 20%, 18.6%, and 18.6% in 2010, 2012, and 2013, respectively, compared with 30.8%, 32.1%, and 32.6% among veterans who used the Veterans Health Administration [8]. Meanwhile, 10.5% and 5.6% of male veterans and non-veterans, respectively, had sought psychological intervention in the past year [9]. Worse, suicide rates among US veterans skyrocketed between 2005 and 2017, rising by 43% among men and 61% among women [10]. Similarly, using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), a study found that the scores of depression, anxiety, and stress among veterans in Australia were 16.09, 12.61, and 19.69, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the general population (6.14, 4.80, and 10.29, respectively) [11]. Evidence from Korea also demonstrated more frequent depressive symptoms and rising suicidal ideation among veterans [12].

This raises the question: “Why is there such a gap in mental health between veterans and non-veterans?” According to the life course theory, the critical events in each person’s life course (e.g., entering school, getting married, joining the army, first job, etc.) comprehensively affect their subsequent health status [13, 14]. Joining the army not only changes a person’s life path and future development but also has a collateral impact on their physical and mental health, which means that it can certainly be described as a key event affecting an individual’s life course [10, 15].

Meanwhile, there is increasing interest in determining the risk factors that can contribute to the mental health issues of veterans because it is increasingly being accepted that risk factors play a critical role in the development of mental health issues [16]. Notably, being female, having low educational attainment, having drinking and smoking habits, or not owning a suitable house is proven to be associated with a higher risk of depression among veterans [10, 17,18,19]. Conversely, social support, particularly from spouses, is considered a potential protective factor for veterans [20]. Moreover, certain aspects of military culture, such as its emphasis on resilience, self-reliance, and avoidance of expressing vulnerable feelings, can cause mental health issues among veterans and treatment avoidance, sometimes leading to suicide [21, 22].

However, Chinese veterans carry an elite status. In the context of the continuous crisis of authority in modern times, the social status of soldiers in China has risen, and they have gradually become the protagonists of its history. Likewise, since the founding of People’s Republic of China (PRC), the social status of servicemembers has improved. There is no denying that they have transformed into a group respected by society. In reality, joining the army is a turning point in one’s life, and could make one’s family or neighbors proud [23]. The Chinese government has also provided comprehensive security for veterans. In 2018, the Ministry of Veterans Affairs, PRC, was established to strengthen the security system for veterans [24]. The Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Ex-Servicemen came into force on January 1, 2021, providing security for ex-servicemembers in terms of placement, education and training, employment and entrepreneurship, and pension and preferential treatment.

As an important event in the life course, military experience has not received much scholarly attention, and there are few studies on the mental health status of Chinese soldiers after they leave the army [25]. To fill this research gap, this study examined male Chinese veterans from 2012‒2018, adopting propensity score matching (PSM) to explore the relationship between military experience and depression among male veterans in China. Specifically, we aimed to answer the following questions: What is the relationship between military experience and depression in male veterans in China? What factors contribute to the relationship between military experience and male veterans’ depression; Is there heterogeneity in the association between military experience and male veterans?

Methods

Study participants

According to data released by the National Bureau of Statistics of China on April 27, 2012, the proportion of male and female soldiers in active service of the People’s Liberation Army is 95.74% and 4.26%. As there were few female veterans in the data source, this study focused on male veterans in China. Data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2012, 2016, and 2018 were used in this study. CFPS2014 was not included because it did not use the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). The CFPS, a nationally representative sample covering China’s 25 provinces/regions and 95% of the population, is implemented by the Chinese Center for Social Science Surveys (ISSS) at Peking University [26]. In the three rounds of research in 2012, 2016, and 2018, the sample sizes were 35,719, 36,892, and 37,354, respectively. Because CFPS conducted a follow-up survey on certain participants, there were repeated participants in the databases of 2012, 2016, and 2018. For the same participants included in two or three waves, we only retained relevant data in the latest year. After combining the three datasets, we removed all data on female respondents, resulting in a total of 20,757 participants. Subsequently, we removed participants with missing values or data that were not applicable and identified 12,768 participants as the final study participants. Figure 1 presents the detailed selection process.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study participants. Data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2012, 2016, and 2018 were applied. Notes: Due to the scarcity of female veterans, only male individuals were included

Measures

Depression

This study measured the mental health of veterans by ascertaining whether they experienced depression. In 2012, 2016, and 2018, the CFPS used the CESD to measure depression among adults, including 20 questions about the self-rated mental health of respondents. Radloff proposed a depressive rating scale ranging from 0 to 60 [27]. A score higher than 28 indicates severe depressive symptoms [27]. Accordingly, adults who scored higher than 28 on the CESD scale of CFPS2012 and 2016 were categorized as “depressed”. Therefore, we used the dummy variable (whether depression) as the main dependent variable of this paper. Simultaneously, we also reported regression results using individual depression scores as the dependent variable in the manuscript and Supplementary materials.

Military experience

Although there are questions about the time of joining the army, the CPFS questionnaire has several missing values. However, in its 2012, 2016, and 2018 questionnaires, the CFPS questionnaire also asks, “Are you a veteran or not?” Therefore, our sample comprising those who answered “yes” were defined as “having military experience.”

Covariates

Referring to previous studies [28, 29], covariables in this association included age, household register (rural or urban), home address (East, Middle, or West China, according to the National Development and Reform Commission), employment (employed or unemployed), marriage (married or unmarried), educational attainment, smoking (whether one smoked in the past month), drinking (whether one drank three times a week or more in the past month), and family size (the logarithm of the total number of people in a household). Meanwhile, we divided the participants into subgroups A (married and unmarried), B (junior college and above and below junior college), and C (urban and rural) according to marital status, education level, and household registration.

Statistical analysis

For Model 1, we used logistic regression to analyze the impact of military experience on depression without controlling the covariates. Model 2 extended Model 1 by including all the covariates described in subsection 2.2.3 (Covariates). Model 3 used unbalanced fixed effects panel data model to test long-term relationships and improve the robustness of the results [30]. Models 4, 5 and 6 were analyzed based on the results of PSM. Similar to Models 1, 2 and 3, Model 4 tested the impact of military experience on the depression experienced by male veterans without covariates, and Model 5 and 6 included all the covariates described in subsection 2.2.3 (Covariates). We used the same analysis in subgroups. With PSM and covariates, Model 5 and 6 was the main model we focused on.

To enhance the credibility of the results, we used PSM to screen the participants. PSM is a common method used in observational research to effectively reduce selection bias [31]. The 1:2 nearest-neighbor matching ratio with replacement was used to match depressed veterans with normal veterans. If the standardized difference was less than 10%, it was considered an indicator of balance [32]. Following PSM, we deleted the participants that failed to match. After the matching, we also adopted logistic regression to examine the effect of military experience on depression among male veterans, accounting for the pairing between veteran and non-veteran groups.

In the sensitivity analysis, 1:2 nearest-neighbor matching with replacement and a caliper of 0.0001 and 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching was used to determine the robustness of the results. We also verified the robustness of the results by including deployment duration as a covariate.

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 15.1 (Stata Corp., LLC). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Study sample

This study included 47,214 participants from CFPS 2012, 2016, and 2018; 12,914 participants remained after excluding the participants with missing information or unqualified conditions. The final sample for the regression analyses following PSM amounted to 1,684. Figure 1 presents the details of the selection.

Propensity score matching

Using PSM, we matched the veteran group, which included 669 male veterans, with a non-veteran group of 1015 men without military experience. Table 1 and Table S4 shows descriptive statistics.

Table 1 The descriptive statistics and T-test result of depression and individual depression score between the veteran and non-veteran groups after propensity score matching in different subgroups

Figure 2 presents the standardized differences between the veteran and non-veteran groups before and after 1:2 nearest-neighbor matching (details are provided in Supplementary Table S1). After matching, the standardized differences of all covariates were significantly decreased. By reducing the standard differences, PSM allowed comparisons between veteran and non-veteran groups.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Standardized differences between the veteran and non-veteran groups before and after the 1:2 nearest-neighbor matching with replacement. Notes: 1) The black dots and yellow dots represent standardized differences before and after matching respectively. 2) Details are provided in Supplementary Table S1

Association estimation in all the participants

Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics and T-test result of depression and individual depression score in the veteran and non-veteran groups.

Table 2 reports the results of regression analysis of military experience and depression before and after 1:2 nearest-neighbor PSM. Covariates are also included in the regression and reported. In Model 5, military experience was associated with a lower likelihood of depression among male veterans (OR = 0.73, 95%CI = 0.59 ~ 0.90, p < 0.01). In Model 6, military experience was also associated with a lower likelihood of depression among male veterans (Coef. = -0.07, 95%CI = -0.11 ~ -0.02, p < 0.01). This conclusion still held true in Models 1‒4. The results indicate that age may be a potential risk factor. In Model 5 and 6, the 20–40 years old age group (OR = 2.73, 95%CI = 1.37 ~ 5.44, p < 0.01; Coef. = 0.20, 95%CI = 0.05 ~ 0.35, p < 0.01), and the 40–60 years old age group were associated with a high likelihood of depression (OR = 2.00, 95%CI = 1.08 ~ 3.70, p < 0.05; Coef. = 0.14, 95%CI = 0.01 ~ 0.28, p < 0.05). Living in cities can also become a risk factor for depression (OR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.52 ~ 0.83, p < 0.001; Coef. = -0.09, 95%CI = -0.14 ~ 0.04, p < 0.001). However, being married was negatively associated with the likelihood of depression (OR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.37 ~ 0.82, p < 0.01; Coef. = -0.11, 95%CI = -0.19 ~ -0.04, p < 0.01). The results of the sensitivity analysis are reported in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3.

Table 2 The association between the military experience and depression in male veterans before and after propensity score matching

Table 3 reports the results of regression analysis of military experience and individual depression score before and after 1:2 nearest-neighbor PSM. Covariates are also included in the regression and reported. In Model 5, military experience was associated with lower depression score among male veterans (Coef. = -1.05, 95%CI = -1.78 ~ -0.32, p < 0.01). In Model 6, military experience was also associated with a lower likelihood of depression among male veterans (Coef. = -1.07, 95%CI = -1.80 ~ -0.34, p < 0.01). This conclusion still held true in Models 1‒4.

Table 3 The association between the military experience and individual depression scores in male veterans before and after propensity score matching

Subgroup analysis

Propensity score matching

With PSM, we matched male veterans with men without military experience in the non-veteran group groups in different subgroups. Supplementary Table S4 shows the descriptive statistics. Supplementary Figure S1 presents the standardized differences between the veteran and non-veteran groups before and after 1:2 nearest-neighbor matching with replacement (details are provided in Supplementary Table S5).

Association estimation in subgroups

Figure 3 demonstrated the after-matching results of subgroups by marriage, educational attainment, and urban/rural residence in Models 4, 5 and 6 (details of the regression results before matching are provided in Supplementary Tables S6, S7 and S8).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The association between military experience and depression in different subgroups after propensity score matching. Notes: 1) *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Coef., coefficient; OR, odds ratio. 2) The results of 1:2 nearest-neighbor matching with replacement was used. 3) Details are provided in Supplementary Table S6, S7 and S8. 4) Model 4 computed odds ratios without any statistical adjustments in matched participants. Model 5 computed odds ratios adjusting for covariates in multivariate logistic regressions in matched participants. Model 6 computed coefficient adjusting for covariates using fixed effect model in matched participants

For married male veterans, military experience was associated with a lower likelihood of depression in Model 5 and 6 (OR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.56 ~ 0.87, p < 0.01; Coef. = -0.08, 95%CI = -0.12 ~ -0.03, p < 0.01). However, the association between military experience of unmarried male veterans and depression was not significant. Military experience was associated with a lower likelihood of depression in both junior college and above (OR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.23 ~ 0.92, p < 0.05; Coef. = -0.15, 95%CI = -0.29 ~ -0.003, p < 0.05) and below junior college groups (OR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.54 ~ 0.88, p < 0.01; Coef. = -0.07, 95%CI = -0.12 ~ -0.01, p < 0.05) in Model 5 and 6. Compared with the insignificant association between depression and the military experience of male veterans who lived in rural areas, military experience was linked with a lower likelihood of depression among male veterans who lived in urban areas (OR = 0.68, 95%CI = 0.51 ~ 0.89, p < 0.01; Coef. = -0.08, 95%CI = -0.15 ~ -0.02, p < 0.01) in Model 5 and 6. These results are valid in different matching methods.

Changing the dependent variable to individual depression score, Fig. 4 demonstrated the after-matching results of subgroups by marriage, educational attainment, and urban/rural residence in Models 4, 5 and 6 (details of the regression results before matching are provided in Supplementary Tables S9, S10 and S11). The relationship between military experience and lower individual depression score was significant among married, below junior college, and urban subgroups.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The association between military experience and individual depression score in different subgroups after propensity score matching. Notes: 1) *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Coef., coefficient. 2) The results of 1:2 nearest-neighbor matching with replacement was used. 3) Details are provided in Supplementary Table S9, S10 and S11. 4) Model 4 computed coefficient without any statistical adjustments in matched participants. Model 5 computed coefficient adjusting for covariates in multivariate logistic regressions in matched participants. Model 6 computed coefficient adjusting for covariates using fixed effect model in matched participants

Discussion

Mental health issues of veterans have been studied in many countries. However, we have little information about how military experience affects depression among male veterans in China. To fill this research gap, we used data from the 2012–2018 CFPS to estimate the association between military experience and depression among Chinese male veterans.

First, evidence from our study indicated that the military experience of Chinese male veterans has a positive impact on the incidence of depression, which is partially different from other countries [2, 3]. We believe that distinct elements of military culture, such as education, alcohol, tobacco, and tolerance, may be of key importance, because these forms of military culture may affect the individuals’ lives in the long-term [33]. Compared with the British army, Chinese soldiers are better educated, and the Chinese government began recruiting volunteers at universities in 2013 [33, 34]. The US military considers tobacco use a right, and alcohol and cannabis use were prevalent among their recruits [19, 35]. Conversely, the Internal Affairs Regulations of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army require that there be no excessive drinking among soldiers and advocate quitting smoking. Moreover, military culture in other countries, which promote characteristics such as toughness, self-reliance, or other traditional male gender norms, may lead to stigma and discrimination when facing mental health issues among the military [36, 37]. This kind of military culture renders mental health issues harder to recognize than medical problems that are physical in nature.

Moreover, admitting to having mental health issues harmed the careers of soldiers who returned from the US mission in Bosnia, which may have caused them to avoid treatment-seeking [21, 38]. In contrast, China’s military culture is more tolerant of soldiers’ mental health issues. According to the Internal Affairs Regulations of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, platoon leaders’ responsibilities include monitoring the psychological status of platoon members. Moreover, mental health services at all levels are required to be strengthened to improve the psychological quality of officers and soldiers. Such an inclusive environment may make enable veterans to seek help for their mental health issues, which may ease their depression.

In addition, social culture itself constitutes a set of unwritten rules that constrains our behavior and influences our life, contributing to the difference [39]. Under the pressure of being invaded, the status of Chinese soldiers advanced by leaps and bounds due to their contribution to the victory of the wars, and gradually established their elite status after the founding of New China. This status was reflected in income, advantages in the marriage market, and interpersonal relationships, etc. [15, 23, 28]. The advantages these veterans have established in society may decrease their depression.

However, the soldiers of other countries do not appear to gain much from their military experience in terms of either income or marriage market [40, 41]. Studies have even demonstrated that military experience might reduce the future earnings of veterans [42]. Moreover, since 2014, the media tend to shape veterans as health victims in the US, which may have created public stereotypes about veterans as “bad” or “mad” [43]. Such stereotypes may be a barrier to veterans pursuing higher goals because civilian students and institutions perceive them as “broken,” “dispirited,” or “crazy and violent” [39, 44]. This negative image of veterans can lead to social stereotypes that might prevent veterans from receiving the respect they expect by virtue of being veterans, increasing their susceptibility to depression.

Additionally, conflicts such as the Korean, Vietnam, and Iraq wars may increase veterans’ depression and other mental health issues [12, 45, 46]. Evidence from US, UK, Canada and Australia also demonstrate the relationship between deployment and mental health issues [6, 47,48,49]. After the Sino-Vietnamese war in the early 1980s, China had not participated in a war for more than 40 years; in contrast, the US is currently involved in multiple wars [50]. Staying away from deployment during military service helps veterans avoid combat-related stress and pain, which may be a potential reason for the negative correlation between military experience and depression among Chinese veterans.

Heterogeneities in the association by marriage, educational attainment, and urban/rural residence were also revealed in this study. Married and urban male veterans are less likely to be diagnosed with depression. Male veterans with all educational attainments exhibited a lower risk of depression, but the difference was more significant in the below junior college group, which may be because people with fewer educational qualifications were more likely to be transformed and promoted by military experience. Moreover, there were no associations between military experience and depression for unmarried and rural veterans.

Like previous studies, our study demonstrated that being married is a protective factor against mental health issues among veterans [20] because strong social support is a predictor of positive mental health [51]. In conclusion, those with strong social support, particularly by their spouse, may be more receptive to stress, which could protect them against mental health issues [33, 52]. Meanwhile, being married may represent a sense of responsibility to others developed in the military, which could potentially protect veterans against depression [53].

Simultaneously, because of China’s household registration system, its urban population has significant advantages in employment types, income, benefits from social welfare policies, government support, and health resources compared with the rural population [54,55,56]. Therefore, the pursuit of a better living environment, and the desire to pursue urban household registration and change their economic and social fates may drive many rural people to join the military [57]. However, once they transition from rural to urban registration, it is hard to revert owing to the Chinese household registration policy. The participants in our study with rural household registration did not obtain urban registration through military experience. Thus, when they found that military experience did not change their circumstances and that they had to stay in the countryside, the impact of military experience on their depression was minimal. For those born in cities rich in social resources, the desire to practice skills and improve their overall abilities may motivate them to join the army [58]. While military service did enhance their skills and abilities, it had a significant effect on reducing their likelihood of depression [59].

Limitations

Despite several strengths, this study has some limitations. First, depression was diagnosed by CES-D, a self-reported scale, which could cause information bias [60]. Second, it is difficult to obtain large and corresponding data related to veterans. Large standard errors may result from the small number of unmarried men studied, which might have affected the significance of the results [61]. In addition, the CFPS does not permit us to describe Chinese male veterans in a more comprehensive manner. Our findings would be strengthened if more covariates, such as economic capability and stable housing, could be included in our study [62, 63]. Moreover, PSM with a range of covariates was used to balance the measured confounding factors; however, we could not control for bias from unobserved confounding factors, which is a limitation common to almost all previous epidemiological studies [64]. Third, to increase the sample volume, we removed duplicate participants from CFPS2012 to 2018; therefore, this study is cross-sectional. However, the possibility that regressions of participants from different years may have caused deviations in results owing to unobservable temporal effects. Thus, we believe a cohort study might be more appropriate to strengthen our findings. Further, we were unable to involve female veterans in our study because female soldiers constitute a small portion of the Chinese military.

Conclusion

Using nationally representative longitudinal data, our study indicates that the military experience of Chinese male veterans is associated with a lower likelihood of depression. After grouping the participants by marriage, educational attainment, and urban/rural residence, we found evidence suggesting that military experience is linked to a lower likelihood of depression among married, urban, junior college and above, and below junior college groups. However, no significant association was found between military experience and depression among unmarried and rural male veterans. Future research should involve female participants, assess subdivided military experiences, and explore the mechanism by which military experience helps suppress depression.

Availability of data and materials

The original data presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: [http://www.isss.pku.edu.cn/cfps/].

References

  1. Langston V, Gould M, Greenberg N. Culture: what is its effect on stress in the military? Mil Med. 2007;172(9):931–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiner MR, Monin JK, Mota N, Pietrzak RH. Age differences in the association of social support and mental health in male US veterans: results from the national health and resilience in veterans study. American J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016;24(4):327–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Norman SB, Haller M, Hamblen JL, Southwick SM, Pietrzak RH. The burden of co-occurring alcohol use disorder and PTSD in US military veterans: comorbidities, functioning, and suicidality. Psychol Addict Behav. 2018;32(2):224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss DS, Marmar CR, Schlenger WE, Fairbank JA, Jordan BK, Hough RL, et al. The prevalence of lifetime and partial posttraumatic-stress-disorder in vietnam theater veterans. J Trauma Stress. 1992;5(3):365–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wessely S, Deahl M. Psychological debriefing is a waste of time. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:12–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rhead R, MacManus D, Jones M, Greenberg N, Fear NT, Goodwin L. Mental health disorders and alcohol misuse among UK military veterans and the general population: a comparison study. Psychol Med. 2022;52(2):292–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mark KM, Leightley D, Pernet D, Murphy D, Stevelink SAM, Fear NT. Identifying veterans using electronic health records in the United Kingdom: a feasibility study. Healthcare. 2020;8(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt MG, Cuddeback GS, Bromley E, Bradford DW, Hoff RA. Changing rates of mental health disorders among veterans treated in the VHA during troop drawdown, 2007–2013. Community Ment Health J. 2019;55(7):1120–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frenk SM, Sautter JM, Woodring JV, Kramarow EA. Veteran status, sociodemographic characteristics, and healthcare factors associated with visiting a mental health professional. Community Ment Health J. 2017;53(5):515–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffmire CA, Monteith LL, Forster JE, Bernhard PA, Blosnich JR, Vogt D, et al. Gender differences in lifetime prevalence and onset timing of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among post-9/11 veterans and nonveterans. Med Care. 2021;59:S84–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MacDonell GV, Bhullar N, Thorsteinsson EB. Depression, anxiety, and stress in partners of Australian combat veterans and military personnel: a comparison with Australian population norms. Peerj. 2016;4:e2373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SW, Kim HC. The veterans experience, depression, and quality of life in elderly patients of a Korean veteran’s hospital. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;29:S220–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elder GH. The life course as developmental theory. Child Dev. 1998;69(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lynch J, Hallqvist J, Power C. Life course epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(10):778–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bing W, Bao Y. Does military experience lead to income premium? (in Chinese). South China Journal of Economics. 2019;01:137–48.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xue C, Ge Y, Tang B, Liu Y, Kang P, Wang M, et al. A Meta-analysis of risk factors for combat-related ptsd among military personnel and veterans. Plos One. 2015;10(3):e0120270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ross D, Mackay DF, Bergman BP. Risk factors for mental ill health in UK Army personnel: an overview. Bmj Military Health. 2022;168(2):166–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. LeardMann CA, Powell TM, Smith TC, Bell MR, Smith B, Boyko EJ, et al. Risk factors associated with suicide in current and former us military personnel. Jama-J American Med Assoc. 2013;310(5):496–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson JP, Pederson LL, Lewis J. Tobacco use in the army: illuminating patterns, practices, and options for treatment. Mil Med. 2009;174(2):162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schoenbaum M, Kessler RC, Gilman SE, Colpe LJ, Heeringa SG, Stein MB, et al. Predictors of Suicide and Accident Death in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) Results From the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS). JAMA Psychiat. 2014;71(5):493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown NB, Bruce SE. Stigma, career worry, and mental illness symptomatology: factors influencing treatment-seeking for operation enduring freedom and operation iraqi freedom soldiers and veterans. Psychological Trauma-Theory Res Pract Policy. 2016;8(3):276–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bryan CJ, Jennings KW, Jobes DA, Bradley JC. Understanding and preventing military suicide. Arch Suicide Res. 2012;16(2):95–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei W. The experience of joining the army, market transformation and the acquisition of elite status (in Chinese). Soc Sci Beijing. 2019;01:108–18.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Feng G. The army experience, capital accumulation and the cultivation of new agricultural management main body (in Chinese). Youth Stud. 2021;01:15–2594.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xiyuan H, Chao G. The association between military experience and health among older adults aged 60 and above in China (in Chinese). Chinese J Dis Control Prevent. 2022;26(01):105–11.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ye X, Zhu D, He P. The long-term impact of adversity in adolescence on health in middle and older adulthood: a natural experiment from the Chinese send-down movement. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(7):1306–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Radloff LS. The use of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale in adolescents and young-adults. J Youth Adolesc. 1991;20(2):149–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xingbang H. Effects of army experience on marriage of rural residents: perspectives of economic factors and social status transition (in Chinese). South China Population. 2021;36(04):37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao C, Guo J. Are Veterans Happy? Long-term military service and the life satisfaction of elderly individuals in China. J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(2):477–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Jiao Y. Modeling seabird bycatch in the US Atlantic pelagic longline fishery: fixed year effect versus random year effect. Ecol Model. 2013;260:36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thoemmes FJ, Kim ES. A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(1):90–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Austin PC. Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research. Commun Statistics-Simulation Comput. 2009;38(6):1228–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ross D, Mackay DF, Bergman BP. Risk factors for mental ill health in UK army personnel: an overview. BMJ Mil Health. 2022;168(2):166–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kiernan MD, Arthur A, Repper J, Mukhuty S, Fear NT. Identifying British Army infantry recruit population characteristics using biographical data. Occupational Med-Oxford. 2016;66(3):252–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith EA, Blackman VS, Malone RE. Death at a discount: how the tobacco industry thwarted tobacco control policies in US military commissaries. Tob Control. 2007;16(1):38–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Thompson EH, Pleck JH. The structure of male-role norms. Am Behav Sci. 1986;29(5):531–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jakupcak M, Blais RK, Grossbard J, Garcia H, Okiishi J. “Toughness” in association with mental health symptoms among iraq and afghanistan war veterans seeking veterans affairs health care. Psycholog Mascul. 2014;15(1):100–4.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Blosnich J, Foynes MM, Shipherd JC. Health disparities among sexual minority women veterans. J Womens Health. 2013;22(7):631–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hunter-Johnson Y, Liu T, Murray K, Niu Y, Surprise M. Higher education as a tool for veterans in transition: battling the challenges. J Continuing Higher Educ. 2021;69(1):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bailey AK, Sykes BL. Veteran status, income, and intergenerational mobility across three cohorts of American men. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2018;37(4):539–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mackintosh M-A, Schaper KM, Willis EA, Edland S, Liu C, White LR. Effects of military service on marital stability among world war II US veterans of japanese descent. Mil Med. 2018;183(9–10):E525–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Angrist JD. Estimating the labor market impact of voluntary military service using social security data on military applicants. Econometrica. 1998;66(2):249–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rhidenour KB, Barrett AK, Blackburn KG. Heroes or health victims?: Exploring how the elite media frames veterans on veterans day. Health Commun. 2019;34(4):371–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Osborne NJ. Student veteran discussion panels: deconstructing the traumatized veteran stigma on campus. About Campus. 2014;19(2):24–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. O’Toole BI, Outram S, Catts SV, Pierse KR. The Mental health of partners of australian vietnam veterans three decades after the war and its relation to veteran military service, combat, and PTSD. J Nervous Mental Dis. 2010;198(11):841–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Reger MA, Etherage JR, Reger GM, Gahm GA. Civilian psychologists in an army culture: The ethical challenge of cultural competence. Mil Psychol. 2008;20(1):21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Boulos D, Zamorski MA. military occupational outcomes in canadian armed forces personnel with and without deployment-related mental disorders. Canadian J Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie. 2016;61(6):348–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Luncheon C, Zack M. Health-related quality of life among US veterans and civilians by race and ethnicity. Preventing Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E108.

    Google Scholar 

  49. O’Toole BI, Catts SV, Outram S, Pierse KR, Cockburn J. The physical and mental health of Australian Vietnam veterans 3 decades after the war and its relation to military service, combat, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(3):318–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hester RD. Lack of access to mental health services contributing to the high suicide rates among veterans. Int J Mental Health Syst. 2017;11:47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Eisen SV, Schultz MR, Glickman ME, Vogt D, Martin JA, Osei-Bonsu PE, et al. Postdeployment resilience as a predictor of mental health in operation enduring freedom/operation Iraqi freedom returnees. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(6):754–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Averill LA, Fleming CJE, Holens PL, Larsen SE. Research on PTSD prevalence in OEF/OIF Veterans: expanding investigation of demographic variables. European J Psychotraumatol. 2015;6:27322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Jakupcak M, Vannoy S, Imel Z, Cook JW, Fontana A, Rosenheck R, et al. Does PTSD moderate the relationship between social support and suicide risk in Iraq and afghanistan war veterans seeking mental health treatment? Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(11):1001–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Afridi F, Li SX, Ren Y. Social identity and inequality: the impact of China’s hukou system. J Public Econ. 2015;123:17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Huo X, Gao Q, Zhai F, Lin M. Effects of welfare entry and exit on adolescent mental health: Evidence from panel data in China. Soc Sci Med. 2020;253:112969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Liu D, Xi J, Hall BJ, Fu M, Zhang B, Guo J, et al. Attitudes toward aging, social support and depression among older adults: difference by urban and rural areas in China. J Affect Disord. 2020;274:85–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yuehua Z. Reflections on the motives of contemporary recruits (in Chinese). Youth Studies. 1996;01:32–6.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zhengxin L. Study on the motivation and action logic of college students joining the Army (in Chinese). Youth Exploration. 2021;05:102–12.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Regan TL, Oaxaca RL. Work experience as a source of specification error in earnings models: implications for gender wage decompositions. J Popul Econ. 2009;22(2):463–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tian F, Yang H, Pan J. Association between functional disability and long-term trajectories of depressive symptoms: evidence from the China Health and retirement longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. 2022;310:10–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Usdansky ML, London AS, Wilmoth JM. Veteran Status, Race-Ethnicity, and Marriage Among Fragile Families. J Marriage Fam. 2009;71(3):768–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Elbogen EB, Zeber JE, Vogt D, Perkins DF, Finley EP, Copeland LA. Financial Status and Well-being in Recently Separated Military Veterans. Military Medicine. 2022.

  63. Paulus PB, Nagar D, Larey TS, Camacho LM. Environmental, lifestyle, and psychological factors in the health and well-being of military families. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1996;26(23):2053–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Gunadi C, Zhu B, Shi Y. Recreational cannabis legalization and transitions in cannabis use: findings from a nationally representative longitudinal cohort in the United States. Addiction. 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Peking University for providing the CFPS data.

Funding

This research was supported by grant Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Fund (grant number 2022A1515011871). This article is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not reflect the views of the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HL was responsible for concept and design of the study. HL and NZ cleaned and analyzed the data. HL, NZ and BZ drafted and revised the manuscript. JZ, RH and YM offered suggestions. TX offered suggestions and helped with revision. YJ offered resources.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Mao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We only used secondary data from the CFPS database which is open for the public. So we did not collect data from the respondents and thus exempted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of our university.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Zhang, N., Zhang, J. et al. The role of military service in preventing depression in China: evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey. BMC Public Health 23, 2447 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17317-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17317-9

Keywords