Skip to main content

Assessing parents’ and children’s psychological well-being and its associated factors during the COVID-19 lockdown in a Tunisian-North African population

Abstract

Background

The rapidly emerging Coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread around the world yielding in significant changes in almost every aspect of daily life. While primary research of the epidemic COVID-19 has focused on the psychological impact on the general population and health professionals, no survey of the pandemic-resulting containment on parents and their children has been yet addressed in the Tunisian-North African population. This study aimed to assess the psychological profile of parents and youth in Tunisia during a period of COVID 19 lockdown, and to identify associated factors to parental anxiety symptoms.

Methods

This is an analytical cross-sectional study composed of a total of 538 adults including 464 mothers and 74 fathers. Parents of children aged less than 18 years completed an online survey (Google Forms) on the Psychological Impact of Confinement which includes the Generalized Anxiety Scale (GAD-7), the Parental Burnout Assessment (PBA), and the infantile trait-anxiety scale. The survey was initiated in May 2020 on a population of the Tunisian-North African citizens and lasted for more than 6 weeks.

Results

The median GAD-7 score was 11 corresponding to a moderate anxiety with 27.8% reporting severe anxiety. The median PBA score was 31 corresponding to a moderate risk of burnout, with 19.5% being affected. The children's anxiety scores were associated with their parents' anxiety ratings with 24% of the children reported signs of moderate anxiety.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic affected parental and their children’ psychological behavior due to a direct social isolation and distancing. Pediatricians need to be alerted on this issue and future measures are essential to avoid parental emotional burnout and anxiety disorder in similar situations.

Peer Review reports

Background

In December 2019, an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province of China, which spread rapidly throughout the country and subsequently around the world. On March the 2nd, Tunisia confirmed the first SARS-COV-2 positive case. The victim being a 40 years-old male, who fled from Italy. The Tunisian government introduced progressive containment measures a week later to prevent contagion of the infectious disease. Since spreading of the pandemic throughout the country, Tunisian families were forced to carry out massive containment and mandatory quarantine three weeks later to contain further spread of the virus as the threat of a pandemic loomed. The living conditions of families changed suddenly and profoundly since that date as the country deployed multiple measures. Kindergartens and schools were temporarily closed, social contacts were severely restricted and leisure activities outside the home were cancelled. Parents were encouraged to support their children in home schooling. The economic situation was worsened. The COVID-19 pandemic triggered the largest global economic crisis in more than a century resulting in 7% drop in global commercial commerce in 2020. This situation resulted not only on heavy financial-related strains [1] but was certainly associated with distress, mental health problems and multiple violence cases in families. Previous study from the pandemic disasters evidenced posttraumatic stress disorder of children and their parents with varying disease-containment experiences [2]. As Masten and Obradovic [3] wrote about the pandemic illness, "families often infect each other before a person is diagnosed; they also infect each other through fear". Recent studies evidenced different levels of psychological distress among people exposed to the COVID-19 epidemic, which triggered a wide variety of psychological problems such as panic disorder, anxiety and depression [4,5,6,7]. Although some studies were made available on the impact of the pandemic on the public, including patients, medical staff, children, and elderly people [8, 9], little is known about the consequences of the pandemic disaster on family psychological and emotional health. It is hypothesized that the COVID-19 epidemic could increase parents' mental disorders, particularly anxiety at both the individual and dyadic levels, with a negative impact on children's emotional and behavioral well-being.

The objective of this study was to assess the psychological impact including anxiety and parental burnout of the COVID-19 pandemic on a Tunisian-North African population composed of parents and youth at the time when the entire country was in a state of general stalemate. We also determined independently associated factors with parental anxiety symptoms.

Methods

Study design and population

This is an analytical cross sectional study based on an online questionnaire. Participants completed the survey via a cloud-based questionnaire (Google Forms). The inclusion criteria of this study were: being parent of a child under 18 years old, having access to the internet and being a citizen of Tunisia. Given that no updated national list of Tunisian citizens with their contact information, it wasn't feasible to randomly select participants. As a result we used the snowball sampling method to gather participants. The required sample size was determined using the following formula: n = [(Zα/2) 2 × p x (1-p)]/i2. We considered a parental anxiety rate (p) of 24% [10], with a precision level (i) of 5%, a 5% error (α), and accounted for a 25% loss. This calculation led to a minimum required sample size of 350 participants.

This study was shared on Facebook for a limited time from the beginning of May to June 3rd of 2020. It should be mentioned that Facebook represents the most popular social media in Tunisia [11]. Therefore, we also paid promoted Facebook ads to motivate parents to participate for the survey.

Questionnaire

The survey consisted of 74 questions divided in 4 categories and lasts for approximately 15 min in total to complete. Both parent-related and child-related questionnaires were completed by the parent. The demographic characteristics included gender, age, occupation, educational and socio-economic levels, parental situation, place and type of residence, number of children and their ages, and their personal somatic and psychiatric history. The Arabic version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) was employed to assess the anxiety symptoms of parents. The GAD-7 is a self-report questionnaire that screens and measures severity of generalized anxiety disorder. Participants rated seven items according to the frequency of symptoms in the past two weeks on a four-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Total score ranges from 0 to 21, with highest scores indicating great severity of anxiety symptoms. The presence of anxiety symptoms was defined as a total score of ≥ 5 points. The GAD-7 is a well-validated screening instrument which has demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.911) [12].

Parental Burnout Assessment (PBA) was conducted in the Arabic version to assess parental burnout in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic [13]. PBA is a 23‐item questionnaire assessing four distinct core dimensions of parental burnout: 1) exhaustion in one’s parental role, 2) contrast with previous parental self, 3) feelings of being fed up with one’s parental role, and 4) emotional distancing from one’s children. The original items were rated on a seven‐point Likert scale. It was simplified to a five-point (0 = never, 4 = daily). The original English and French versions of the PBA were shown to demonstrate good internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha reliabilities being 0.93, 0.93, 0.90, and 0.81 for the four subscales, respectively, and the correlations between the four factors varying from 0.66 (exhaustion and emotional distancing) to 0.78 (contrast with previous parental self and feelings of being fed up as a parent [14]. The presence of burnout was defined as a total score of 51.

The psychological impact of COVID-19 among children was investigated using a parent report form of the infantile trait-anxiety scale [15, 16]. It is a validated questionnaire elaborated in the Arabic Tunisian dialect to assess symptoms of anxiety disorders in children, with Cronbach’s alpha at 0.93, sensibility at 82.5% and specificity at 0.97%. It explores psychological, behavioral, and somatic dimensions of anxiety. The original 34-item scale was adjusted to a 32-item according to the current context. Participants rated each item according to the frequency of symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a four-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (always). Total scores ranged from 0 to 96, with the highest score indicating greater severity of anxiety. Scores were considered normal (0–20) or indicative of mild (21–43), moderate (44–66), or severe (67–96) psychological impact.

Children’s eating disturbance was assessed using questions with Likert scale of four points (no, sometimes, often, always). These questions investigated whether children are more or less than their usual intake, and whether they had special customs or practices related to food. To investigate children’s sleep disturbance, parents were asked about children’ sleep patterns, difficulties falling asleep, and dream experiences.

In addition, we constructed additional items to explore cyber addiction. Three questions inquired the usage of electronic devices and its impact on children. The screen time duration and whether children experienced resistance or negative emotions when asked to decrease screen time. The perceived impact of electronic device usage on children's eating habits, sleep patterns, and interpersonal relationships. Classification for screen time duration were: less than 1 h, between 1–2 h, between 2–4 h and more than 4 h. Other questions were conducted with the Likert scale of 4 points. Cyberaddiction, sleep and eating disturbance scores were determined by adding points.

Data analysis

The final raw data were downloaded from Google Forms and converted into a Comma Separated Value (CSV) file for analysis using SPSS software (version 21.0 for Windows). The analysis of descriptive statistics was conducted to illustrate the demographic and others elected characteristics of the respondents. A univariate analysis was used to explore the significant associations between sample characteristics and the parental anxiety level during the COVID-19 epidemic. Variables with p < 0.2 in univariate analysis were screened and included in the multivariate logistic regression analyses. The estimates of the strengths of associations were demonstrated by the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical considerations

The current study was carried out in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. An approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Military Hospital of Tunis was obtained (#68/2020/CLPP). All participants voluntarily gave their informed consent (within the Google form) to access the questionnaire and to participate in the study after being informed about the purpose of the study. The questionnaires were anonymous to ensure confidentiality and data reliability.

Results

A total of 541 participants responded and completed the online survey. Three participants were excluded since they provided incomplete information.

Characteristics of the study population

The study of the family status revealed a majority for mothers (86.2%) that were enrolled in this study (Table 1). Almost half (55.7%) of the mothers were aged between 30 and 40 years old. Most of the parents reported previous high school which accounted for 81.9% of the total population questioned. Seventy two percent of the participants were from the middle socioeconomic class with more than the half (57.1%) being employed. The respondents lived mainly inside Tunisia (98%) within urban areas (95.5%). Most of the parents had two children under 6 years of age or aged 6 through 12.

Table 1 Parents socio-demographic characteristics

Children with a psychiatric history was reported in 15.6% of the population (Table 2). The most common diagnoses were attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, 9.9%), autism spectrum disorder (ASD, 3.2%), and depression (1.3%). Somatic history accounted for 12.6% with 8.6% suffered from asthma, 1.3% epilepsy, 1.3% immunodeficiency, 0.6% deafness, and 0.4% genetic disease.

Table 2 Children’s socio-demographic and clinical characteristics

Effects of the COVID crisis on parent and child psychological aspects

The sample average for generalized anxiety in adults accounted for 11 indicating a moderate anxiety. The level of anxiety was severe for 27.8%, moderate for 40.8%, mild for 19.2% and minimal for 12.2% of the parents (Table 3). A state for burnout was confirmed in 19.5% of cases. The proportions of parents with high, moderate, and low burnout were 13.3%, 13%, and 16.8%, respectively. It was found that 37.3% of the population did not experience a state of mental exhaustion.

Table 3 Parents and children psychological impact

The average for infantile anxiety score was 34 in children indicating mild anxiety behavior. The level of anxiety was severe (1.3%), moderate (23.1%), mild (56.2%), and minimal (16.4%).

Factors associated with symptoms of anxiety among parents during the COVID-19 epidemic

Gender, occupation, and PBA were strongly associated (p < 0.001) with anxiety symptoms. However, age, parental situation, educational level socio-economic level, place of residence, number of children had no significant (Table 4). As for factors related to children and associated to parental anxiety, we found that the infantile trait-anxiety scale, children’s cyber addiction score, sleep disturbance score and eating disturbance score were associated with parental anxiety.

Table 4 Univariate analysis of variables related to parental anxiety

To eliminate confounding factors and determine the variables independently associated with parental anxiety symptoms, a multivariate regression model was used. The results revealed four determining factors. Occupation was identified as a protective factor against anxiety. Whereas parents with moderate or severe burnout were significantly at higher risk of being anxious (OR = 2.834). In addition, the study showed that the parental anxiety score increased significantly among parents whose children have higher levels of cyber addiction and eating disorders (Table 5).

Table 5 Multivariate analysis of variables related to parental anxiety

Discussion

The SARS-COV-2 epidemic has profoundly affected Tunisian families. The impact of prolonged isolation and confinement at home are causing profound changes in family routines and habits. The governmental decision to postpone school activities and lock up children at home was maybe necessary, but the consequences on the mental health of families were barely considered.

This study was initiated to examine the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on the psychological and emotional health of parents and children of a Tunisian-North African population. More than half of the parents reported moderate to severe level of anxiety and children’s anxiety was positively associated to their parent’s with one in four of children having evidence of moderate anxiety.

In the current pandemic context, some earlier studies have also shown that children’s assessments were correlated with those of their parents, suggesting the important link between the mental health of parents and their children [17,18,19]. Parenting can be stressful under normative circumstances like confinement [20,21,22,23].

Many families are isolated at home under the influence of an accumulated stress and pressure. They are unable to receive support from the extended family and could no longer engage in leisure activities, which can exacerbate the impact of these stressors [24]. In this study, mothers had higher levels of anxiety resulting from the pandemic COVID-19 confinement. This result is consistent with previous studies evaluating the psychological impact of COVID-19 on parents and reporting that mothers were more severely affected [25,26,27]. Our study and earlier ones call for psychosocial attention to be paid to women.

Although the confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in beneficial increasing responsibilities for parents, families were expected to report financial difficulties as an additional familial stress factor during the pandemic. This study revealed a significant association between discontinued professional activity and anxiety symptoms which suggest that financial difficulties may trigger psychological issues like anxiety. Juan et al. suggested that financial loss, resulting from midlife, is a risk factor for symptoms of psychological disorders, anger, and anxiety [28].

Parental burnout and its risk factors were elevated in participants of the current study following the pandemic COVID19. During this specific period, parental unemployment, financial insecurity, and lack of free time may trigger parental emotional and mental exhaustion and increase the risk of burnout as previously reported [29]. These changes may increase parental risk of burnout as they struggle to find time for themselves and balance their personal, work and parental responsibilities. While many parents have lost their jobs, many others have switched to working from home while involving their children in home schooling or virtual education activities.

The current pandemic situation is particularly unique since access to traditional social supports from extended family and friends has been cancelled or very limited. Many parents often rely on the support of children’s grandparents or other family members for childcare or assistance with parenting activities. An important number of studies evidenced the importance of social supports for parental well-being, and contact with grandparents, can reduce the risk of parental burnout [30]. In addition, it was reported an association between parental burnout and child abuse and neglect [31, 32]. These associations have also been supported by intervention research, which has shown that child abuse and neglect can be reduced by interventions aimed at decreasing levels of parental burnout [33].

During this special period, the psychological impact is experienced both at the individual level (feeling anxious and irritated) and at the dyadic level (having difficulties to interact with the child). However, little was known about the psychological distress of children exposed to the pandemic. Although, children may be particularly vulnerable to the psychological effects of COVID-19 [6, 8, 34, 35]. It has been postulated that fear can be contagious and that children are extremely sensitive to the emotional state of the adults around them who constitute their first source of emotional security. Thus, it can be particularly frightening for a child to perceive that one of or both parents are in distress and unable to prevent an occurring traumatic event. In addition, the more stressed are the parents, the more they experience difficulty in understanding and responding sensitively to their child's needs [16]. In addition, children have fewer personal resources to cope with the pandemic consequences [36]. The role of the parents was particularly important in mitigating the psychological effects of confinement. Child developmental studies highlighted that children rely on trusted adults, in particular their parents, for protection and referencing for danger assessment and making sense of the events [37]. Besides, anxiety is often associated with rude behavior and difficulties in explaining boundaries and discipline. As a result, children may feel less understood by their parents and may react more negatively and aggressively [38]. Parents may interpret this as misbehavior, oppositional behavior and tantrums.

During the lockdown period, schools were closed and children were forced to stay at home. Whereas, a recent study suggested that when children are not attending the school, they are less physically active, have poorer sleep hygiene, and spend more time in front of screens [39]. In these times of severe social isolation, the amount of time that children and adolescents spend in front of the screen has increased dramatically. In addition, the overuse of social networks makes them vulnerable to online predators, cyber bullying and potentially harmful content. Besides, disturbances resulting from the current pandemic were associated with behavioral problems [40, 41]. These behaviors can lead to parental doubts and feelings of inadequacy and difficulties in understanding and empathy, increasing feelings of sadness and lack of control, lack of sleep, and lack of attention from caregivers. This supports the results of this study suggesting that children's life habits during the lockdown are linked to parental anxiety.

These results suggest many implications that should be addressed in the short and long-term in all countries, affected by the pandemic. Parents should maintain, in a comfortable family environment and adequate sleep, the children's daily rhythms of life, such as balance between work and rest, regular activities and entertainment. Other studies are required to study the medium and long-term consequences of the pandemic in all countries affected by the virus, particularly Tunisia. Interventions designed to promote positive adaptations to the COVID-19 crisis should be aimed main at improving family financial conditions, providing adequate childcare, and increasing job security and flexibility for parents, as these interventions can help improving the mental status of children. For children, it is suggested to educate them, maintain safe distances from screens, practicing personal hygiene.

Some limitations of the present study should be addressed. First, this is a correlational modality, and the recall period was relatively short. A longitudinal exploration of the effects of quarantine on parents and the cascading effects on children over time can help a better understand of the phenomenon. Second, the sample was self-selected, and the population was limited and targeted. Third, our data rely on self-reports rather than clinical health assessments, and without other measures of past psychopathology. Finally, we have collected children’s psychological symptoms from parent reports; although this data collection method may be less informative than direct evaluation of children’s well-being made by experts.

Conclusion

This study was done during the mandatory lockdown during the first wave of Corona (6 weeks) to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on parents and children on psychological well-being. Its findings highlight the severe psychological impact of the confinement on parents with more than half of parents reported moderate to severe level of anxiety and with 19.5% affected by a burnout. Results also show the close link between parent and child distress. These findings raise serious concerns about the need for specific social and psychological support programs for parents and families, both during and after the pandemic. Further research is required to assess pandemic short and long-term consequences of covid-19 pandemic.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Argabright ST, Tran KT, Visoki E, DiDomenico GE, Moore TM, Barzilay R. COVID-19-related financial strain and adolescent mental health. Lancet Reg Health - Am. 2022;16: 100391.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sprang G, Silman M. Posttraumatic stress disorder in parents and youth after health-related disasters. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013;7(1):105–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Masten AS, Obradovic J. Disaster preparation and recovery: Lessons from research on resilience in human development. Ecol Soc. 2008;13(1). Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50149091123&partnerID=8YFLogxK. Cited 9 Oct 2023

  4. Clemente-Suárez VJ, Dalamitros AA, Beltran-Velasco AI, Mielgo-Ayuso J, Tornero-Aguilera JF. Social and psychophysiological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic: an extensive literature review. Front Psychol. 2020;11: 580225.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet Lond Engl. 2020;395(10227):912–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatry. 2020;33(2): e100213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Loades ME, Chatburn E, Higson-Sweeney N, Reynolds S, Shafran R, Brigden A, et al. Rapid systematic review: the impact of social isolation and loneliness on the mental health of children and adolescents in the context of COVID-19. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59(11):1218-1239.e3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen F, Zheng D, Liu J, Gong Y, Guan Z, Lou D. Depression and anxiety among adolescents during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88:36–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Han J, Zhang X, Zhang S, Li Y, Zhang D, Chen Q. Analysis of the anxiety level and influencing factors during the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic among the parents of students in China. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1143836.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. StatCounter Global Stats. Social Media Stats Tunisia. Available from: https://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/tunisia. Cited 2023 Oct 9

  12. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roskam I, Brianda ME, Mikolajczak M. A Step Forward in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Parental Burnout: The Parental Burnout Assessment (PBA). Front Psychol. 2018;9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00758. Cited 9 Oct 2023

  14. Mikolajczak M, Roskam I. A Theoretical and Clinical Framework for Parental Burnout: The Balance Between Risks and Resources (BR2). Front Psychol. 2018;9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00886. Cited 9 Oct 2023

  15. Bouden A, Halayem MB, Fakhfakh R. Preliminary validation study of infantile trait-anxiety scale. Neuropsychiatr Enfance Adolesc. 2002;50:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abidin RR. The determinants of parenting behavior. J Clin Child Psychol. 1992;21(4):407–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gassman-Pines A, Ananat EO, Fitz-Henley J. COVID-19 and parent-child psychological well-being. Pediatrics. 2020;146(4): e2020007294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Romero E, López-Romero L, Domínguez-Álvarez B, Villar P, Gómez-Fraguela JA. Testing the effects of COVID-19 confinement in Spanish children: the role of parents’ distress, emotional problems and specific parenting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(19):6975.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Russell BS, Hutchison M, Tambling R, Tomkunas AJ, Horton AL. Initial challenges of caregiving during COVID-19: caregiver burden, mental health, and the parent-child relationship. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020;51(5):671–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Andrés-Romero MP, Flujas-Contreras JM, Fernández-Torres M, Gómez-Becerra I, Sánchez-López P. Analysis of Psychosocial Adjustment in the Family During Confinement: Problems and Habits of Children and Youth and Parental Stress and Resilience. Front Psychol. 2021;12. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647645. Cited 9 Oct 2023

  21. Taubman-Ben-Ari O, Ben-Yaakov O, Chasson M. Parenting stress among new parents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child Abuse Negl. 2021;117:105080.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Giannotti M, Mazzoni N, Bentenuto A, Venuti P, de Falco S. Family adjustment to COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: parental stress, coparenting, and child externalizing behavior. Fam Process. 2022;61(2):745–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Whaley GL, Pfefferbaum B. Parental challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic: psychological outcomes and risk and protective factors. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023;25(4):165–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gervais C, Côté I, Pierce T, Vallée-Ouimet S, de Montigny F. Family Functioning and the Pandemic: How Do Parental Perceived Social Support and Mental Health Contribute to Family Health?. Can J Nurs Res. 2023;55(3):365–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/08445621231175757.

  25. Patrick SW, Henkhaus LE, Zickafoose JS, Lovell K, Halvorson A, Loch S, et al. Well-being of parents and children during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey. Pediatrics. 2020;146(4): e2020016824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marchetti D, Fontanesi L, Mazza C, Di Giandomenico S, Roma P, Verrocchio MC. Parenting-related exhaustion during the Italian COVID-19 lockdown. J Pediatr Psychol. 2020;45(10):1114–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huebener M, Waights S, Spiess CK, Siegel NA, Wagner GG. Parental well-being in times of Covid-19 in Germany. Rev Econ Househ. 2021;19(1):91–122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeong H, Yim HW, Song YJ, Ki M, Min JA, Cho J, et al. Mental health status of people isolated due to Middle East respiratory syndrome. Epidemiol Health. 2016;38: e2016048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lindström C, Aman J, Norberg AL. Parental burnout in relation to sociodemographic, psychosocial and personality factors as well as disease duration and glycaemic control in children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992. 2011;100(7):1011–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Parkes A, Sweeting H, Wight D. Parenting stress and parent support among mothers with high and low education. J Fam Psychol. 2015;29(6):907–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Griffith AK. Parental burnout and child maltreatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Fam Viol. 2022;37(5):725–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown SM, Doom JR, Lechuga-Peña S, Watamura SE, Koppels T. Stress and parenting during the global COVID-19 pandemic. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;110: 104699.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Brianda ME, Roskam I, Gross JJ, Franssen A, Kapala F, Gérard F, et al. Treating parental burnout: impact of two treatment modalities on burnout symptoms, emotions, hair cortisol, and parental neglect and violence. Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(5):330–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Saurabh K, Ranjan S. Compliance and psychological impact of quarantine in children and adolescents due to Covid-19 pandemic. Indian J Pediatr. 2020;87(7):532–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Xie X, Xue Q, Zhou Y, Zhu K, Liu Q, Zhang J, et al. Mental health status among children in home confinement during the Coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Hubei Province, China. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;2020: e201619.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liu JJ, Bao Y, Huang X, Shi J, Lu L. Mental health considerations for children quarantined because of COVID-19. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(5):347–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pynoos RS, Steinberg AM, Piacentini JC. A developmental psychopathology model of childhood traumatic stress and intersection with anxiety disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;46(11):1542–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pinquart M. Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents: An updated meta-analysis. Dev Psychol. 2017;53(5):873–932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brazendale K, Beets MW, Weaver RG, Pate RR, Turner-McGrievy GM, Kaczynski AT, et al. Understanding differences between summer vs. school obesogenic behaviors of children: the structured days hypothesis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang G, Takahashi M, Wu R, Liu Z, Adachi M, Saito M, et al. Association between sleep disturbances and emotional/Behavioral problems in Chinese and Japanese preschoolers. Behav Sleep Med. 2020;18(3):420–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu Z, Tang H, Jin Q, Wang G, Yang Z, Chen H, et al. Sleep of preschoolers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. J Sleep Res. 2021;30(1): e13142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Adel Tekari for their invaluable assistance in the revision of this manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AG, HS and MBF designed the study, participated in data analysis and interpretation, SM and SG acquired the data and wrote the manuscript draft, HE and OA revised the manuscript draft. All the authors approved the final submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manel Ben Fredj.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The procedures of this study complied with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki regarding research on Human participants. An approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Military Hospital of Tunis was obtained. The study population were adults and parents having at least a child aged less than 18 years old. All participants voluntarily gave their informed consent to participate in the study after being informed about the purpose of the study. The questionnaires were anonymous to ensure confidentiality and data reliability.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guedria, A., Slama, H., Fredj, M.B. et al. Assessing parents’ and children’s psychological well-being and its associated factors during the COVID-19 lockdown in a Tunisian-North African population. BMC Public Health 23, 2280 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17206-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17206-1

Keywords