Skip to main content
Download PDF

A tryst of ‘blood pressure control- sex- comorbidities’: the odyssey of basic public health services in Yunnan in quest for truth

BMC Public Health volume 24, Article number: 490 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The Basic Public Health Service (BPHS), a recently announced free healthcare program, aims to combat the most prevalent Noncommunicable Disease-“Hypertension” (HTN)-and its risk factors on a nationwide scale. In China, there is a rife that HTN less impacts women during their lifetime. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the sex disparity in hypertension patients with comorbidities among south-west Chinese and the contribution of BPHS to address that concern.

Methods

We have opted for a multistage stratified random sampling method to enroll hypertensive patients of 35 years and older, divided them into BPHS and non-BPHS groups. We assessed the sex disparity in HTN patients with four major comorbidities- Dyslipidemia, Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Cardiovascular Disease (CVD), and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), and descriptive data were compiled. Odds ratios from logistic regression models estimated the effectiveness of BPHS in the management of HTN with comorbidities.

Results

Among 1521 hypertensive patients,1011(66.5%) were managed in the BPHS group. The proportion of patients who had at least one comorbidity was 70.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.3-76.8%), patients aged 65 years and older were more likely to have coexisting comorbidities. Participants who received the BPHS showed significant blood pressure (BP) control with two comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] = 2.414, 95% CI: 1.276–4.570), three or more (OR = 5.500, 95%CI: 1.174–25.756). Patients with dyslipidemia and DM also benefited from BPHS in controlling BP (OR = 2.169, 95% CI: 1.430–3.289) and (OR = 2.785, 95%CI: 1.242–6.246), respectively. In certain high-income urban survey centers, there was sex differences in the HTN management provided by BPHS, with men having better BP control rates than women.

Conclusions

Perhaps this is the first study in China to succinctly show the effectiveness and sex disparity regarding “management of hypertensive comorbidities”. This supports that the BPHS program plays a pivotal role in controlling BP, therefore should recommend the national healthcare system to give women a foremost priority in BPHS, especially to those from low-socioeconomic and low-scientific literacy regions.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Hypertension (HTN) is a major modifiable risk factor and a leading cause of mortality and premature deaths among the NCD’S [1–2]. It is reported that more than 1 billion people are affected globally [3]. Managing HTN is a significant public health concern [4]. The prevalence of HTN is increasing in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries [3,4,5].

China has approximately 245 million HTN patients, with treatment and control rates of only 40.7% and 15.3%, respectively [6]. HTN is not only a risk factor for many unfavorable clinical outcomes but also has an adverse effect on other conditions like diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular diseases (CVD), stroke, and loss of cognitive function [7,8,9,10]. Therefore, even modest improvements in the management of raised BP might have a significant long-term positive impact, especially in patients with underlying comorbid conditions [7]. It is reported that two-thirds of hypertensive patients had underlying comorbidities such as DM, CKD, CVD, and dyslipidemia [11].

BP is not only diurnal [12–13] but also a dimorphic variable that can change at different rates in males and females throughout their life span [13–14]. These variations are caused by a combination of genetically (sex-related) and psychosocially (gender-related) determined variables [15–16], but overall, men are more likely to have other coexisting conditions in China [17]. The prevalence of HTN differs between males and females with comorbidities, as does their awareness of the condition [6, 18,19,20,21]. Sex disparities in the treatment of HTN with comorbidities, however, have not received enough consideration [22–23]. Sex disparities in HTN care, which have been overlooked, would hinder the Sustainable Development Goal (SDGs) of reducing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) mortality by one-third [24–25]. It would be challenging to reach SDG’s goal of 3.0 in Yunnan Province (a low-income region in south-west China) [26].

Based on the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) hypertension guidelines [27] and the Chinese guidelines [28–29], it was prioritized to take into account HTN along with other comorbidities like CVD, heart failure, stroke, CKD, DM, and dyslipidemia when considering secondary prevention. The Basic Public Health Service (BPHS) program is a nationwide free primary health care policy initiated by the Chinese government, and one of its main pillar is the management of HTN [30–31]. In the past, numerous publications from China have focused on different risk factors that can be modified to reduce hypertension [32,33,34,35]. These were followed by reports on how the BPHS policy launch attempted to address and combat these risk factors through proper lifestyle and treatment adherence guidance [33, 36–37]. However, a meta-analysis revealed that the efficacy of managing HTN in individuals with comorbidities through BPHS program still remains a question [38]. In addition, there are currently no data outlining how health services can control the prevalence of HTN with comorbidities in the south-west Chinese population across sex.

In our study, which was conducted in Yunnan province, the main objectives were to examine how sex differences play a role in the management of HTN, especially in hypertensive populations with underlying comorbidities, as well as how the new health policy ‘BPHS’ introduced by the government is capable of managing this issue.

Methods

Study design, setting, and participants

This cross-sectional study was carried out among HTN patients between January 2021 to December 2021 in Yunnan, a province with a population of 47.2 million. Yunnan was chosen as the survey location for the national monitoring project because it is unique in several ways. Its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita is 5068 USD, which is markedly less than the average GDP of the rest of China, which is 8777 USD. It is a home for ethnic minorities (25 out of 55 official ethnic minorities). Furthermore, this province has a diverse terrain that includes mountain ranges (94% of the landscape), turbulent rivers, idyllic lakes, and terraced hills. Yunnan Center has adhered to the guidelines concerning its study design of sites, sampling scheme, and sampling size mentioned by the “Chinese Cardiovascular Disease and Related Risk Factors Monitoring Project“(Chinese equivalent to the Demographic and Health Survey, DHS), organized by the National Center for Cardiovascular Disease (NCCD). As we needed a sample size representative of the entire Yunnan province; we employed a multistage stratified random sampling method representing the entire adult population in both sex [33]. A total of 9600 residents aged 18 years and older were randomly selected from 4 urban areas and 4 rural counties in Yunnan Province for cardiovascular disease screening (for more details, see Fig. 1 in Supplementary file 1).

In this survey, 2764 cases of HTN among 9600 adults met the diagnostic criteria outlined in the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) [7]. According to the recommendations of the BPHS health care policy, the target group for HTN management is individuals who are 35 years of age and older with past history of hypertension or who were already on anti-hypertensive medications [30–31]. Therefore, newly diagnosed patients who are younger than 35 were excluded for comparability purposes. Subsequently 1521 participants, both men and women aged 35 years old or above with or without comorbidities were included in this study.

We linked these 1521 patients’ unique identifiers to the BPHS electronic system in Yunnan Province, 1011 patients who received the services of BPHS management were included in the ‘BPHS group’, and those who did not receive were included in the ‘non-BPHS group’ (see Fig. 2 in Supplementary file 1). This study has been approved by the Ethics Review Boards of NCCD and informed consent and electronic signatures were obtained on-site for all participants. An overview of the study was presented in Supplementary file 2.

Data collection and variables

Data collection

We created a uniform data management platform and used iPads with a unified preconfigured APP to save information from surveys on-site, which is in accordance with the NCCD manual. The face-to-face interviews using a standard structured questionnaire designed by NCCD were collected by a group of well-trained investigators (physicians, nurses, medical college students, and pharmacists) at each study center.

Independent variables

Most of the independent variables used in this study were categorical, representing demographic characteristics, lifestyle, history of hypertension, and history of comorbidities, amongst whom the ethnic groups are divided as the Han (nationwide ethnic majority) and ethnic minorities. Ages were categorized as “35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and ≥ 65 years”. Information regarding sex, marital status, residence, and employment status were also collected. Annual household income was classified as low income (lower than the moderate level of < 4487 USD/year) and high income (4487 USD/year and above). The educational level was divided into primary or lower school, middle school, or higher. Current smokers are defined as those who have smoked one cigarette per day for more than six months [39], and current drinkers are those who drink alcohol at least once a week [40]. Further, the investigators asked whether patients had received the following lifestyle modification health education in the past two weeks (including reduced sodium intake, increased physical activity, weight loss, tobacco cessation, reduced alcohol intake, and stress reduction intervention), which were consistent with ISH and ACC guidelines [7, 27]. The study included dichotomous variables for history of HTN, anti-hypertensive medications, and history of comorbidities. Anti-hypertensive drugs are divided into five major categories: angiotensin-converting, enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and diuretics [29].

BP and anthropometric measurements

All participants, after resting in a seated position for at least five minutes, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured from the right arm by OMRON HBP-1300 (OMRON Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), at 5-minute intervals. Three readings were taken, and the average of the three measurements was computed for subsequent analysis. The height was measured with an RGZ-160 measurement device (Jiangsu Suhong Medical Instruments Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China), and the weight of the participants wearing light clothing, without hats, shoes, coats, or any extra weights in the pockets, was measured using the InBody H20B measurement instrument (InBody Co., Ltd., Seoul, South Korea). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing a person’s weight (kg) divided by the square of their height (m) [41], and was categorized as underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal (BMI: 18.5–23.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI: 23-24.9 kg/m2) and obese (BMI≥25 kg/m2), respectively.

Blood sample collection and biomarker testing

After fasting for at least 8 h, 8ml of intravenous blood samples were collected for cryopreservation and sent to the Beijing ZhongtongLanbo laboratory (Beijing, China) to measure total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), fasting glucose and serum creatinine levels. In addition, urinary creatinine and albumin were measured using an enzymatic method and immunoturbidimetric assays to calculate the urinary albumin to creatinine (ACR) ratio. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)was calculated by the following equation from “Chinese Modification of Diet in Renal Disease“ [42], eGFR = 175 × Scr− 1.234× age− 0.179 [if female, × 0.79].

Target BP

Determining SBP and DBP as a cut-off for the study is done after revising many guidelines. In the past decade, the international guidelines and consensus reports have been continuously updated [43] with regard to targeting BP ranges with coexisting conditions and also at different age groups. BP < 140/90 for those aged < 80 [44], aged ≥ 80 targets at < 150/90 mmHg [45–46], for the age group < 60, it was < 140/90, and for the age group ≥ 60 yrs it was < 150/90 mmHg [47]. For underlying comorbid conditions, the recommendations were HTN with DM, the BP was targeted to < 140/85, CKD without overt proteinuria < 140/90, CKD with overt proteinuria < 130/90 mmHg [45], and HTN with DM or CKD the BP target was < 140/90 [47]. A target of SBP of < 120 mmHg [48] was recommended if the patients had at least one CVD risk factor. The proposed low BP objective in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD was not examined to the same extent in any other trials like the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT), Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP), and Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) [49–50]. More detailed information on “Target BP” was provided in Supplementary file 3. There were many scoring systems that emerged to target SBP [51–52]. However, there are no such scoring systems or BP target guidelines for the Chinese population with comorbidities. Therefore, for all practical purposes, we considered a target BP of “140/90 mmHg” for hypertensive patients with or without comorbidities across the sex who were enrolled in our study.

Comorbidity variables

Firstly, participants self-report their comorbidities by answering questions with a yes or no. After participants’ medical records are verified, qualified professionals check the data twice for relevant lab reports and prescriptions for any underlying chronic illnesses/ comorbidities to ensure its integrity and accuracy. We included only four comorbidities that are more prevalent in our study- dyslipidemia, CVD, CKD, DM. Patients with CVD were defined as having a history of hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic heart diseases, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and peripheral artery disease [7, 53]. According to the “Chinese Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia (2016 edition)“ [54], the presence of one or more of the following was defined as dyslipidemia: high TG (≥ 2.26 mmol/L), high TC (≥ 6.22 mmol/L), high LDL-C (≥ 4.14 mmol/L), low HDL-C (< 1.04 mmol/L), or self-report on taking an anti-hypolipidemic drug. DM was defined as 7.0 mmol/L of fasting blood glucose or self-reported use of antidiabetic medications in the past two weeks, according to the Chinese Diabetes Society definition [55]. In addition, CKD was defined as the presence of albuminuria (UACR ≥ 30 mg/g) or eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 [56].

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics for continuous data were presented by mean, standard deviation, and t-test. Categorical variables were described by numbers and percentages (%), and intergroup comparisons were made using the Chi-square test. We compared comorbidities detection rates in subgroups stratified by age group and sex. To explore the potential effect of lifestyle modification and anti-hypertensive medication adherence instruction on BP control, we compared patients enrolled or not in BPHS management.

To further visualize the graphs and to construct the models, both the BPHS and non-BPHS groups were stratified according to the specific comorbidities (dyslipidemia, CVD, CKD, DM) and the number of the presence of the above-accumulated comorbidities (classified as with “comorbidity”, “without comorbidity”, “one comorbidity”, “two comorbidities”, and “≥ three comorbidities”). We used the binary logistic regression models to test the association of enrolled BPHS management and BP control, with BP control as the dependent variable (uncontrolled as the reference). Model 1 was adjusted for the age (35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and ≥ 65), sex (male vs. female), residence (urban residence vs. rural residence), nationality (Han minority vs. ethnic minorities), education attainment (primary school or lower vs. middle school or higher), family income (low income vs. high income). Model 2 added adjusted current smokers (yes vs. no), current drinkers (yes vs. no), and BMI (< 23 vs. ≥ 23). Model 3 was further adjusted for the types of anti-hypertensive medications taken. The odds ratio (OR) values and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and presented in the forest plot, and all models were analyzed for multicollinearity to ensure their robustness. For the variables included in the models, the variance inflation factor (VIF) is less than 5, and there is no evidence of collinearity between the independent variables. To further elucidate sex differences in BP control rates, we constructed maps to visualize control rates among male and female participants at eight survey centers. Where relevant, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines reporting was followed (Supplementary file 4). All model goodness-of-fit, coefficients, variability, and models’ selection were provided with details in Supplementary file 5.

All statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS 20.0 software and R version 4.0.5 (https://www.r-project.org). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General characteristics of the participants

A total of 1521 patients with previously known status of HTN, an average age of 62.6 ± 12.6 years, mainly being women (51.5%), living in urban areas (56.4%), Han (73.5%), and having a low income (72.6%) and low education level (59.0%), were included. Furthermore, 70.7% of patients (95% CI: 66.3-76.8%) had at least one coexisting comorbidity.

Among male and female hypertensive patients, 61.7% and 70.9% were managed by BPHS, respectively; most of them were 65 and older, as well as those with low household income and little education (untrained or under primary school but could read and write), which constituted the BPHS categories for both sex.

In the male BPHS group, the proportion of patients with comorbidities was 70.3%, and the proportion of those with three or more comorbidities (9.2%) was higher than in the non-BPHS group (5.0%). In the female BPHS group, 72.3% of patients had other coexisting diseases, which was significantly higher than that in the non-BPHS group (64.0%, p < 0.05), and the proportion of those with two (22.3%) and three or more comorbidities (6.8%) was slightly lower than that in the non-BPHS group (Table 1). Regardless of the comorbidity, both male and female hypertensive patients were more likely to have these coexisting conditions at 65 years and older (Table 2). But women had a higher prevalence of comorbidity than men (Dyslipidemia 51.3% vs. 35.2%, CVD 79.4% vs. 56.5%, CKD 57.1% vs. 49.8%, DM 50.4% vs. 49.2%).

Table 1 Comparison of the characteristics of HTN patients under BPHS or non-BPHS groups stratified by sex in Yunnan, China
Full size table
Table 2 Distribution of the four comorbidities in patients of different age groups
Full size table

Lifestyle modification services in BPHS vs. non-BPHS groups

Male patients in the BPHS group were more likely to receive lifestyle modification and medication guidance, including reduced salt intake (89.6% vs. non-BPHS 82.6%), quit smoking (87.4% vs. 81.6%), reduced alcohol intake (87.8% vs. 81.5%), stress reduction guidance (81.8% vs. 73.7%), and were more likely to take anti-hypertensive medications (p < 0.05). Female participants were more likely to seek advice on improving physical activity and weight loss management compared to men (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of lifestyle modification guidance and medication taking under BPHS or non-BPHS groups stratified by sex
Full size table

BP control among individuals with comorbidities

Figure 1 shows that, using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for confounders, it was demonstrated that BPHS maintained to promote BP control in patients with dyslipidemia (OR = 2.169, 95% CI: 1.430–3.289) and DM (OR = 2.785, 95%, CI: 1.242–6.246), both p < 0.05. However, the fully adjusted model was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) in HTN patients combined with CKD, as shown in Fig. 1 and Supplementary file 5.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Association between BPHS management and BP control in patients with different comorbidities according to multivariate logistic regression models. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, residence, ethnicity, education level, and household income. Model 2 added adjusted smoke, drinking, and BMI based on Model 1. Model 3 further added adjusted kinds of anti-hypertensive medications. *Indicates p < 0.05, **indicates p < 0.01, *** indicates p < 0.001

Full size image

Figure 2 shows the association between BPHS (stratified by individuals without comorbidities compared to individuals with one / two / three comorbidities and BP control. In the 445 patients without comorbidities, BPHS demonstrated that it was beneficial to achieve BP control (OR = 2.090, 95%CI: 1.256–3.470). Among 1076 patients with comorbidities, a higher BP control was also observed in the BPHS group (OR = 1.442, 95% CI: 1.051–1.979). Furthermore, the BPHS group showed significantly better BP control among the patients with two comorbidities (OR = 2.414, 95% CI: 1.276–4.570) and three or more (OR = 5.500, 95%CI: 1.174–25.756).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association between BPHS management and BP control in patients with accumulated comorbidities according to multivariate logistic regression models. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, residence, ethnicity, education level, and household income. Model 2 added adjusted smoke, drinking, and BMI based on Model 1. Model 3 further added adjusted kinds of anti-hypertensive medications. *Indicates p < 0.05, **indicates p < 0.01, *** indicates p < 0.001

Full size image

SBP/DBP variations in individuals with comorbidities across sex

Figure 3 shows the SBP and DBP in patients with four comorbidities in the BPHS and non-BPHS groups stratified by sex. Among male participants, SBP was significantly lower in the BPHS group in the presence of CVD compared to the non-BPHS group, while DBP was lower in patients with dyslipidemia, CKD, and DM (both p < 0.05). Both SBP and DBP were lower in female patients with DM in the BPHS group. Women with CVD in the BPHS group had lower SBP, and those with dyslipidemia had lower DBP(p < 0.05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

SBP/DBP difference with individual comorbidities under BPHS and non-BPHS management in Yunnan, China

Full size image

Figure 4 presents the BP of the BPHS and non-BPHS groups of male and female patients with different numbers of comorbidities. Male HTN patients with three or more comorbidities in the BPHS group had significantly lower SBP than those in the non-BPHS group. DBP was lower regardless of the number of comorbidities. In female participants, SBP and DBP were lower in the BPHS group with two additional conditions.

Fig. 4
figure 4

SBP/DBP difference with accumulated comorbidities under BPHS and non-BPHS management in Yunnan, China

Full size image

BP control among men and women from urban/rural communities

Participants were enrolled from both urban (Mengzi, Guandu, Dali, Zhaoyang) and rural (Dayao, Xinping, Chengjiang, Anning) survey centers in Yunnan Province. Overall, the BP control rate of male and female patients in the BPHS group was higher than that in the non-BPHS group from Dayao, Xinping, Mengzi, and Chengjiang. However, BP control rates were significantly higher in men than women in the urban areas of “Guandu” as well as in the rural area of “Chengjiang” (Supplementary file 6).

Supplementary file 7 shows the BP control rate in men and women with coexisting comorbidities in all eight study centers. Both male and female participants with dyslipidemia, CVD, CKD, and DM experienced a higher rate of BP control in the BPHS group than in the non-BPHS group. Despite having four comorbidities, men from the urban areas of “Guandu” (Fig. 1G in Supplementary file 7) and “Mengzi” (Fig. 1D in Supplementary file 7) in the BPHS group had a higher control rate than female patients.

Discussion

This study explored the effectiveness of BPHS policy in reducing HTN among those with pre-existing long-term comorbidities. Also, it revealed whether women and men benefited equally from BPHS policy. We presented the findings of a survey associated with the BPHS program to analyze BP control in hypertensive patients with comorbidities. We found that 70.7% (1076/1521) of HTN patients had at least one coexisting comorbidity, which was higher than the percentage found in studies from Hong Kong (47.4%) [57] and the UK (51.0%) [58].

Dyslipidemia was the primary comorbidity for the majority of the participants (43.7%), followed by CKD (35.5%), which is consistent with the fact that dyslipidemia was the most prevalent comorbidity in the Chinese hypertensive population (about 41.3%) [59–60]. HTN combined with hypercholesterolemia has become the most important risk factor for ischemic heart disease mortality among Chinese residents [61]. HTN has resulted in 32.75 million disability-adjusted life years in entire China [62]; hypertensive patients with low socioeconomic status, low health literacy, and having lower access to medical services [63] require considerable health resource input, especially in south-west China, where the population is aging in a higher rate. Attention was deemed necessary in the interim since China has the highest proportion of CKD patients in Asia (up to 159.8 million) [64].

ISH [7] and ACC guidelines [27] recommend lifestyle intervention for CVD prevention and non-pharmacological treatment of hypertensive comorbidities as an effective means to lower BP. Consistent with ISH and ACC guidelines, the Chinese national standards for BPHS (the third edition) [31] recommend primary healthcare providers to create personalized models of lifestyle modification for hypertensive patients, to supervise and track constantly, to provide patient counseling, and to encourage patients to follow the recommended lifestyle changes consistently. Thus, lifestyle modification was included as an essential component of managing hypertensive patients [28, 31, 65]. This study found that a higher percentage of male hypertensive patients with comorbidities in the BPHS group received services related to salt reduction instruction (BPHS 89.6% vs. non-BPHS 82.6%), alcohol consumption reduction (87.8% vs.81.5%), and stress reduction guidance (81.8% vs. 73.7%). It is observed that the more the primary healthcare practitioners provided health education and lifestyle modifications to patients, the more it enhanced health awareness, helped in BP control, and encouraged people to adopt a better lifestyle [66–67].

This study also found that BPHS group patients with comorbidities had a higher proportion of taking a single drug (BPHS group 54.3% vs. non-BPHS group 37.2%) or combination of drugs (17.3% vs. 8.6%) than those in the non-BPHS group, which is in line with a report stating that HTN patients with comorbidities typically took more medications for a longer period of time to manage their blood pressure [7, 29]. ‘Consistency’ could be the key to effectively controlling BP in comorbid patients in the BPHS group. A patient-centered approach to clinical practice and the use of herbal medications were linked to optimum BP control in earlier studies, which may offer guidance for future BPHS policy amendments [68–69].

Moreover, our study observed lower DBP and SBP in the BPHS group, regardless of the different types of comorbidities or accumulated comorbidities. As hypertensive dyslipidemia or DM, patients were 2.169 times and 2.785 times more likely to receive BPHS management, respectively, and a similar trend was observed in patients with comorbidities clusters. The above findings further provided sufficient evidence that BPHS can effectively manage HTN with comorbidities in the low-income provinces of south-west China. However, the adjusted model from HTN patients with CKD was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), and the results imply that “anti-hypertensive medication” appears to be a substantial and important predictor of BP control, which detracts from/influences the potential association between the independent variable (BPHS management) and the dependent variable (BP control). It is evident that the BPHS management system should be a priority consideration for hypertensive patients with comorbid CKD. Unlike the current clinical practice recommendations, which primarily address managing HTN from a single comorbidity [70], our findings support the trend among primary healthcare providers to monitor BP and assess risks to manage the targeted BP better and provide high-quality services, as per international guidelines for the treatment of hypertensive patients with multiple and accumulated comorbidities.

In addition, this study demonstrated that, compared to the non-BPHS group, the BPHS care group was beneficial in lowering SBP and DBP with multiple comorbidities in both sex. In some high-income urban survey centers, men appeared more likely to have their BP well under control. Previous studies from Denmark and the United States have reported differences in BP control rates depending on the presence of different diseases in men as compared to women [53, 71]. Current HTN recommendations give sex disparity relatively minimal consideration [23, 72]. Therefore, national health initiatives like BPHS must consider this inequality. This can be achieved by providing additional BPHS resources, particularly in areas with limited access to female patients with multiple comorbidities.

The study reveals that BPHS would significantly contribute to the ‘targeted BP control’ among patients with comorbidities and encourage them to adhere to BPHS-assisted lifestyle changes. Furthermore, by imparting the most recent information and experience, it would benefit prospective policies in LMIC regions.

Limitation

The results could have been impacted by the duration and occurrence of CKD, CVD, and DM, but we did not validate this interdependency in this study. The relationship between BPHS management and BP control should be evaluated cautiously due to the limitations imposed by the cross-sectional study methodology. Secondly, the efficiency of HTN management could have been unintentionally underestimated in hypertensive patients with comorbidities (1, 2, 3, or more comorbidities) owing to the short duration of BPHS services provided. Thirdly, this study identified four comorbidities as the most prevalent comorbidities (dyslipidemia, DM, CKD, CVD) in the Chinese populace, and thus only these four were considered in inclusion criteria, and minor comorbidities like Gout, rheumatic changes, dementia, and tumors were excluded from the study. Due to a very small sample size of patients in the group with four major comorbidities in some survey centers attributed to a lack of ‘scientific literacy’ in general, therefore both BPHS and non-BPHS enrollment trajectories declined significantly. This is inexorably shown on individual study center maps, which presents as extreme values of cases with control rates of “0 “or “100”, especially “Anning” study center (see Supplementary file 7).

Our recommendations to health policymakers are: (a) Future prospective cohort studies should consider enrolling a larger sample size, as doing so could help to better assess the effectiveness of BPHS in lowering BP, reducing related disability, and preserving medical and health resources in hypertension patients with complications. (b) NCD’s awareness camps should be conducted prior to study, as centers like “Anning” seems to lack ‘scientific literacy’ in general. (c) Furthermore, an emphasis on extensive research is necessary to comprehend the mechanisms by which sex influences the onset of HTN and vascular aging, as well as how this correlation can help in the early prevention of other comorbid conditions. (d) Due to the constant changes in the guidelines [73] for treating HTN, there should be an introduction of Chinese HTN education program recommendations for the management of hypertension, which should be taught to healthcare providers on a regular basis. (e) By collaborating with other Asian societies of HTN [74–75] and sharing knowledge with international committees working on HTN, it is essential to develop a HTN treatment specifically tailored to suit the Chinese race.

Conclusion

This study evaluated the community-based Chinese BPHS program for effectively managing male and female hypertensive patients with comorbidities and found that almost two-thirds of the hypertensive patients have comorbidity in Yunnan Province. The BPHS program also successfully encouraged healthy lifestyle changes, lowered DBP and SBP, and improved BP control in HTN patients with various comorbidities. However, we also observed that male patients with HTN seemed to benefit more from BPHS than women. For the first time in China, this study results call for better management strategies and allocation of health care resources for chronic diseases, especially to women in older age group.

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study and its supplementary material are available on reasonable request from the project administrator/principal corresponding author (LD).

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

BP:

Blood pressure

BPHS:

Basic public health services

CI:

Confidence interval

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

CVD:

Cardiovascular diseases

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HTN:

Hypertension

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LMICs:

Low and middle-income countries

NCD:

Non-communicable diseases

OR:

Odds ratio

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

References

  1. GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1223–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, Yin P, Zhu J, Chen W, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1145–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in Hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398(10304):957–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou B, Perel P, Mensah GA, Ezzati M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and Hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(11):785–802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schutte AE, SrinivasapuraVenkateshmurthy N, Mohan S, Prabhakaran D. Hypertension in low- and Middle-Income Countries. Circ Res. 2021;128(7):808–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Chen Z, Zhang L, Wang X, Hao G, Zhang Z, et al. Status of Hypertension in China: results from the China Hypertension Survey, 2012–2015. Circulation. 2018;137(22):2344–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2020;75(6):1334–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alsaadon H, Afroz A, Karim A, Habib SH, Alramadan MJ, Billah B, et al. Hypertension and its related factors among patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - a multi-hospital study in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shrestha PL, Shrestha PA, Vivo RP. Epidemiology of comorbidities in patients with Hypertension. Curr OpinCardiol. 2016;31(4):376–80.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y, Zhou ZF, Han JM, Jin X, Dong ZF, Liu L, et al. Patients with comorbid coronary artery Disease and Hypertension: a cross-sectional study with data from the NHANES. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10(13):745.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kennard L, O’Shaughnessy KM. Treating Hypertension in patients with medical comorbidities. BMJ. 2016;352:i101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Narita K, Hoshide S, Kario K. Difference between morning and evening home blood pressure and cardiovascular events: the J-HOP study (Japan Morning Surge-Home blood pressure). Hypertens Res. 2021;44(12):1597–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kario K, Ishikawa J, Pickering TG, Hoshide S, Eguchi K, Morinari M, et al. Morning Hypertension: the strongest Independent risk factor for Stroke in Elderly Hypertensive patients. Hypertens Res. 2006;29(8):581–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoshide S, Kubota K, Kario K. Difference between morning and evening blood pressure at home and nocturnal hypoxia in the general practitioner-based. J-HOP Study Hypertens Res. 2023;46(3):751–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu Y, Möller J, Wang R, Liang Y. Life-course blood pressure trajectories and Cardiovascular Diseases: a population-based cohort study in China. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0240804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Connelly PJ, Currie G, Delles C. Sex differences in the prevalence, outcomes and Management of Hypertension. CurrHypertens Rep. 2022;24(6):185–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J, Ma JJ, Liu J, Zeng DD, Song C, Cao Z. Prevalence and risk factors of comorbidities among hypertensive patients in China. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14(3):201–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 update: a Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(8):e254–e743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeGuire J, Clarke J, Rouleau K, Roy J, Bushnik T. Blood pressure and Hypertension. Health Rep. 2019;30(2):14–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neufcourt L, Deguen S, Bayat S, Paillard F, Zins M, Grimaud O. Geographical variations in the prevalence of hypertensionin France: cross-sectional analysis of the CONSTANCES cohort. Eur J PrevCardiol. 2019;26(12):1242–51.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fenech G, Vallée A, Cherfan M, Kab S, Goldberg M, Zins M, et al. Poor awareness of Hypertension in France: the CONSTANCES Population-based study. Am J Hypertens. 2020;33(6):543–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Connelly PJ, Azizi Z, Alipour P, Delles C, Pilote L, Raparelli V. The importance of gender to Understand Sex differences in Cardiovascular Disease. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(5):699–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Song J-J, Ma Z, Wang J, Chen L-X, Zhong J-C. Gender differences in Hypertension. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2020;13(1):47–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cao B, Bray F, Ilbawi A, Soerjomataram I. Effect on longevity of one-third reduction in premature mortality from non-communicable Diseases by 2030: a global analysis of the sustainable development goal health target. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(12):e1288–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Redfern A, Peters SAE, Luo R, Cheng Y, Li C, Wang J, et al. Sex differences in the awareness, treatment, and control of hypertensionin China: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Hypertens Res. 2019;42(2):273–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen S, Guo L, Wang Z, Mao W, Ge Y, Ying X, et al. Current situation and progress toward the 2030 health-related Sustainable Development Goals in China: a systematic analysis. PLoS Med. 2019;16(11):e1002975.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DEJr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH et al. /ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):e127-e248.

  28. Bureau of Disease Prevention and Control. National Health Commission of people’s Republic of China. National guideline for Hypertension management in China. Zhonghua Xin xue guan bing za zhi. 2020;48:10–46.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Joint Committee for Guideline R. 2018 Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension-A report of the Revision Committee of Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019;16(3):182–241.

  30. Li X, Lu J, Hu S, Cheng KK, De Maeseneer J, Meng Q, et al. The primary healthcare system in China. The Lancet. 2017;390(10112):2584–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ministry of Health. National guideline of basic public health services (Third Edition). 2017. http://wjw.beijing.gov.cn/wjwh/ztzl/ggwsfw/201912/P020191217743891499573.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2023.

  32. Hao G, Chen Z, Wang X, Zhang L, Kang Y, Zheng C, et al. Evaluation of the community-based Hypertension Management Programs in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:896603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pang L, Kottu L, Guo Z, Shi Y, Ferdous M, Zhao Y, et al. Dawning public health services dogma: an indigenous South-West Chinese perspective in managing hypertension-with or without the BPHS? Front Public Health. 2022;10:1017795.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Liang X, Chen J, Liu Y, He C, Li T. The effect of Hypertension and Diabetes management in South-West China: a before- and after-intervention study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e91801.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan C, Yuan Y, Zhao D, Li J, Fu P, Chen Y, et al. Family Doctor Contract services and awareness of blood pressure measurement among Hypertension patients: a cross-sectional study in rural Shandong, China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:757481.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zheng X, Xiao F, Li R, Yin D, Xin Q, Yang H, et al. The effectiveness of Hypertension management in China: a community-based intervention study. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019;20:e111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Fang G, Yang D, Wang L, Wang Z, Liang Y, Yang J. Experiences and Challenges of Implementing Universal Health Coverage with China’s National Basic Public Health Service Program: Literature Review, Regression Analysis, and Insider interviews. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022;8(7):e31289.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith SM, Wallace E, O’Dowd T, Fortin M. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;1(1):Cd006560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li G, Wang H, Wang K, Wang W, Dong F, Qian Y, et al. The association between Smoking and blood pressure in men: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):797.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li Z, Yu S, Han X, Liu J, Yao H. Changes to cardiovascular risk factors over 7 years: a prospective cohort study of in situ urbanised residents in the Chaoyang District of Beijing. BMJ Open. 2020;10(3):e033548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhou BF. Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related Diseases in Chinese adults–study on optimal cut-off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci. 2002;15(1):83–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ma YC, Zuo L, Chen JH, Luo Q, Yu XQ, Li Y, et al. Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(10):2937–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hoshide S, Mogi M, Kario K. The next stage of Hypertension management in Asia. Hypertens Res. 2022;45(10):1552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Krause T, Lovibond K, Caulfield M, McCormack T, Williams B. Management of Hypertension: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011;343:d4891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redón J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial Hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281–357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Weber MA, Schiffrin EL, White WB, Mann S, Lindholm LH, Kenerson JG, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of Hypertension in the community a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2014;32(1):3–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of High Blood Pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311(5):507–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ghazi L, Oparil S. Impact of the SPRINT Trial on Hypertension Management. Annu Rev Med. 2018;69:81–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nilsson P. What is the optimal blood pressure in patients with Diabetes Mellitus? Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2001;1(3):173–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Herberth J, Soliman KM, Fülöp T, Basile JN. How we got where we are in blood pressure targets. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2021;23(6):33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen L, Tonkin AM, Moon L, Mitchell P, Dobson A, Giles G, et al. Recalibration and validation of the SCORE risk chart in the Australian population: the AusSCORE chart. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16(5):562–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Conroy RM, Pyörälä K, Fitzgerald AP, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G, et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal Cardiovascular Disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(11):987–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Paulsen MS, Andersen M, Thomsen JL, Schroll H, Larsen PV, Lykkegaard J, et al. Multimorbidity and blood pressure control in 37 651 hypertensive patients from Danish general practice. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;2(1):e004531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Joint committee for guideline r. 2016 Chinese guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia in adults. J GeriatrCardiol. 2018;15(1):1–29.

  55. Chinese Diabetes Society. National guidelines for the prevention and control of Diabetes in primary care. ZhonghuaNeiKe Za Zhi. 2018;57:885–93.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kidney Disease. Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group.KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2022;102(5s):1–s127.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Li YT, Wang HHX, Liu KQL, Lee GKY, Chan WM, Griffiths SM, et al. Medication adherence and blood pressure control among hypertensive patients with coexisting long-term conditions in primary care settings: a cross-sectional analysis. Med (Baltim). 2016;95(20):e3572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sarkar C, Dodhia H, Crompton J, Schofield P, White P, Millett C, et al. Hypertension: a cross-sectional study of the role of multimorbidity in blood pressure control. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Hypertensive Group of Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association. Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology.Expert consensus on the comprehensive management of blood pressure and dyslipidemia in Chinese hypertensive patients. Zhonghua Xin xue guan bing za zhi. 2021;49:554–63.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Xing L, Jing L, Tian Y, Yan H, Zhang B, Sun Q, et al. Epidemiology of dyslipidemia and associated cardiovascular risk factors in northeast China: a cross-sectional study. NutrMetab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;30(12):2262–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang G, Yu C, Zhou M, Wang L, Zhang Y, Luo L. Burden of ischaemic Heart Disease and attributable risk factors in China from 1990 to 2015: findings from the global burden of Disease 2015 study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L, et al. Global Burden of Hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115 mm hg, 1990–2015. JAMA. 2017;317(2):165–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Li X, Cai L, Cui WL, Wang XM, Li HF, He JH, et al. Association of socioeconomic and lifestyle factors with chronic non-communicable Diseases and multimorbidity among the elderly in rural south-west China. J Public Health (Oxf). 2020;42(2):239–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Liyanage T, Toyama T, Hockham C, Ninomiya T, Perkovic V, Woodward M et al. Prevalence of chronic Kidney Disease in Asia: a systematic review and analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(1).

  65. Ministry of Health, Treasury Department, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Announcement on the national basic public health service project in 2016. http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/jws/s3577/201606/f29a4659c7f4455ca6f62f8d14eb4b02.shtml.Accessed 25 Mar 2023.

  66. Zhang R, Chen Y, Liu S, Liang S, Wang G, Li L, et al. Progress of equalizing basic public health services in South-West China— health education delivery in primary healthcare sectors. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhou T, Wang Y, Zhang H, Wu C, Tian N, Cui J, et al. Primary care institutional characteristics associated with Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in the China PEACE-Million persons Project and primary healthcare survey: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(1):e83–e94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Buawangpong N, Pinyopornpanish K, Jiraporncharoen W, Dejkriengkraikul N, Sagulkoo P, Pateekhum C, Angkurawaranon C. Incorporating the patient-centered approach into clinical practice helps improve quality of care in cases of Hypertension: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Thangsuk P, Pinyopornpanish K, Jiraporncharoen W, Buawangpong N, Angkurawaranon C. Is the Association between Herbal Use and blood-pressure control mediated by Medication Adherence? A cross-sectional study in primary care. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021, 18(24).

  70. Skou ST, Mair FS, Fortin M, Guthrie B, Nunes BP, Miranda JJ, et al. Multimorbidity Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8(1):48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Gu Q, Burt VL, Paulose-Ram R, Dillon CF. Gender differences in Hypertension treatment, drug utilization patterns, and blood pressure control among US adults with Hypertension: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21(7):789–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Griffin BL, Bolch CA, Bourjeily G, Madsen TE, Hasnain M, McGregor AJ, et al. Hypertension: are current guidelines inclusive of sex and gender? J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022;31(10):1391–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Weber MA, Schiffrin EL, White WB, Mann S, Lindholm LH, Kenerson JG, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of Hypertension in the community: a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014;16(1):14–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hoshide S, Mogi M, Kario K. Current status of Hypertension and treatment in Asia. Hypertens Res. 2022;45(7):1095–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Kario K, Mogi M, Hoshide S. Latest Hypertension research to inform clinical practice in Asia. Hypertens Res. 2022;45(4):555–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases for providing the overall program design and planning. The authors also thank the Yunnan Provincial Health Commission for the electronic Basic Public Health Service program data and the coordination of multiple departments at each surveillance site. We also thank Beijing Woodpecker Cloud Health Technology Co., Ltd for their technical support during data collection. We also thank all the health workers, nurses, paramedics, volunteers, caregivers, supporters, and researchers who took part in this project.

Funding

This study was funded by building a joint laboratory for important chronic and epidemic diseases in South and Southeast Asia (Grant No. 202103AF140002); Yunnan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases-New Technology Research and Development Project for Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Cardiovascular Diseases (Grant No. 202102AA310002); Research and Application of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases in High Altitude of Yunnan Province Project (Grant No.202103AC100004).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Linhong Pang and Lakshme Kottu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital, Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 650221, Kunming, China

    Linhong Pang, Zihong Guo, Yajing Zhao, Mingjing Tang, Yi Shi, Junjie Song, Manli Sun & Lin Duo

  2. School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, 650500, Kunming, China

    Linhong Pang, Min Ma, Huadan Wang, Wei Liu, Xia Wu & Liping He

  3. Division of Experimental Cardiology, Erasmus university medical center, 3015GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Lakshme Kottu & Daphne Merkus

  4. Walter Brendel Center of Experimental Medicine (WBex), LMU, 81377, Munich, Germany

    Daphne Merkus

  5. The Third People’s Hospital of Longgang District, 518083, Shenzhen, China

    Md Misbahul Ferdous

  6. Lepu Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, 102200, Beijing, China

    Md Misbahul Ferdous

Authors
  1. Linhong Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lakshme Kottu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zihong Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Min Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huadan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yajing Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mingjing Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yi Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xia Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Junjie Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Manli Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Daphne Merkus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Md Misbahul Ferdous
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Liping He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Lin Duo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LP and LK were co-first authors and drafted the manuscript. MF, ZG and LH initiated, conceived, and supervised the study. LD, DM, WL and YZ guided the analysis and modified the article. LP, MM and HW were involved in data curation and analysis. MT, YS and XW completed field execution and coordinated all divisions. JS and MS checked the integrity of the data. LK and DM reviewed and edited the manuscript. LD conceptualized, and supervised this project. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Md Misbahul Ferdous, Liping He or Lin Duo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the Ethics Review Boards of National Center for Cardiovascular Disease (approval number: 2020 − 1360, approval date: August 11, 2020), and informed consent and electronic signatures were obtained on-site for all participants. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pang, L., Kottu, L., Guo, Z. et al. A tryst of ‘blood pressure control- sex- comorbidities’: the odyssey of basic public health services in Yunnan in quest for truth. BMC Public Health 24, 490 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17157-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17157-7

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us