Skip to main content
Download PDF

A high body mass index strengthens the association between the time of eye rubbing and keratoconus in a Chinese population: a case control study

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 2032 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Although body mass index (BMI) and eye rubbing are linked to an increased risk of keratoconus (KC), the interactive effect of eye rubbing and BMI on KC is largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the independent and interactive effects of BMI and eye rubbing on KC and to further explore the role of environmental factors on the occurrence of KC.

Methods

A total of 621 individuals (291 KC patients and 330 control individuals) were enrolled in this hospital‑based study on KC patients in Central China after individuals missing BMI data were excluded. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Data on eye rubbing was recorded through face-to-face interviews. Generalized linear regression models were used to analyze associations among BMI, eye rubbing and KC. Interaction plots were used to describe the interactive effects of BMI and eye rubbing on KC.

Results

The β and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 0.923 (0.112, 1.733) (p = 0.026) and 3.356 (1.953, 4.759) (p < 0.001), respectively, for the effect of each 10 kg/m2 increase in BMI and each 1 min increase in eye rubbing on KC. The interaction of BMI and eye rubbing were positively correlated with KC (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

These findings suggested that a high BMI aggravated the negative effect of eye rubbing on KC, implying that individuals with a high BMI may be more susceptible to exposure to eye rubbing, which is related to an increased risk of KC.

Peer Review reports

Background

Keratoconus (KC) is a common degenerative eye disease that involves ectasia of the central or paracentral steeping and thinning cornea [1, 2]. A recent study showed that the prevalence of KC is 1.38 per 1000 [3], and it is worth noting that a Netherlands study suggested that the prevalence and incidence of KC were 5 times higher than those in a previous study conducted 30 years ago [4]. Additionally, KC leads to some degree of visual impairment and decreases the quality of life of the patient, which brings a heavy social and economic burden to the patient and will be an impediment to social and economic development [4, 5].

Generally, KC usually occurs in puberty. It occurs bilaterally but asymmetrically in most cases [6]. Until now, the pathological mechanism of KC has not been clear. However, it is generally believed that KC is multifactorial and influenced by a combination of environmental, genetic, auto-metabolism, viral infections, lifestyle, and immunity factors [7]. Several studies have suggested that eye rubbing [3, 8], body mass index (BMI) [9], exposure to ultraviolet light [10], atopy [11], family history of the KC [12], and contact lens [13] are common risk factors for KC. In our previous study, we also showed that there is a separate positive relationship between atopy, eye rubbing and KC. In addition, there is an interactive effect between eye rubbing and atopy on KC, which suggests that the interaction of various environmental factors should be considered for the occurrence and development of KC [14].

BMI is linked to obesity, which is one of the strongest risk factors for sleep apnea and might be related to the occurrence of KC [9, 15, 16]. Until now, several limited studies have been conducted to explore the relationship between BMI and KC. Although several studies have failed to confirm that BMI is a risk factor for KC [15, 17], a nationwide study suggested an strong independent association between BMI and KC [9]. Furthermore, there is still a lack of evidence on the interactive effect of eye rubbing and BMI on KC, which are all closely related to the expression of inflammatory mediators. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess associations of eye rubbing and BMI with KC and their interactive effect on KC using a case‒control study based on clinical data and KC patients in Central China.

Methods

Settings and participants

The subjects of the case‒control study were patients from the Henan Eye Hospital during 2019–2022. Details of the design of the case‒control study have been described elsewhere [14, 18, 19]. Briefly, in this study, the participants were recruited based on age (3 years) and sex. A total of 621 individuals (291 KC patients and 330 control individuals) were recruited in the present study after excluding the participants who had missing data on weight and height (n = 39). KC was diagnosed by the following criteria [20]: at least one positive sign on slit-lamp examination (Munson’s sign, corneal scar, Vogt’s striae, or Fleischer’s ring), Belin Ambrosio enhanced ectasia total deviation index value > 2.6 and an asymmetric bowtie pattern without or with skewed axes revealed by a corneal topography map. Participants scheduled for refractive surgery with corneal astigmatism < 1.50 D, corrected distance visual acuity in LogMAR ≤ 0.1, and spherical equivalent < 8.00 diopters were included in the control group.

Estimation of covariates

Information on demographic characteristics and eye rubbing was collected through face-to-face interviews [14]. Educational levels were divided into middle school or below and high school or above groups. Occupation was classified into students and others. The time of eye use was determined based on the question of how much time did you spend using electronic products (computer, cell phone, etc.) and paper products (books, newspapers, etc.) per day in the last week? The time of eye rubbing was assessed using three questions. (1) How many days a week do you rub your eyes? (2) How many times a day do you rub your eyes? (3) How long do you rub your eyes each time? The time of eye rubbing (min/day) was evaluated using the formula: time (min) × frequency (every day) × day (every week)/7. Each subject’s height was measured using a tape measure while leaning against a calibrated wall without shoes. Each subject’s weight was measured using an Omron body fat body weight measurement device (V. BODY HBF-371, OMRON, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Categorical and continuous variables are presented as number (percentage) and mean ± standard deviation (SD), respectively. The categorical variables and normally distributed variables between the KC and no KC groups were compared by the chi-square test and Student’s t test, respectively. Two models were developed to assess the associations among the time of eye rubbing, BMI and KC by using generalized linear models. Model 1 was unadjusted; Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, education level, occupation, history of eye disease, history of eye surgery, history of ocular trauma, history of systemic disease, family history of KC, the time of eye use and myopia age. Interaction plots were applied to describe the interaction effects of BMI and the time of eye rubbing on KC after adjusting for age, sex, education level, occupation, history of eye disease, history of eye surgery, history of ocular trauma, history of systemic disease, family history of KC, the time of eye use and myopia age. All data were analyzed by using R version 4.0.0, and the statistical significance was set at a two-tailed p-value < 0.05.

Results

Study population characteristics

Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of the 621 subjects. The mean ± SD age of individuals with and without KC were 21.08 ± 5.58 and 20.59 ± 4.53, respectively. Different distributions of education level, occupation, history of eye disease, history of ocular trauma, history of systemic disease, myopia age, the time of eye use, BMI and the time of eye rubbing were found between individuals with and without KC (all p < 0.05). Figure 1 shows that the median and quartile of BMI were 21.57 (19.53–23.71) kg/m2 and 21.03 (19.26–22.95) kg/m2 in individuals with and without KC, respectively. Figure 2 shows that the median and quartile of the time of eye rubbing were 3.33 (1.67-5.00) min/day and 0.00 (0.00–0.00) min/day in individuals with and without KC, respectively.

Table 1 Distributions of selected variables of the study participants by different level of electronics and print-out
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

The violin plot presents the distributions of BMI (kg/m2)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

The violin plot presents the distributions of the time of eye rubbing (min/day)

Full size image

Associations of BMI or the time of eye rubbing with KC

Figure 3 shows that in the crude model, the β and 95% confidence interval (CI) of BMI and the time of eye rubbing were 0.571 (0.070, 1.073) (p = 0.026) and 5.295 (3.767, 6.822) (p < 0.001), respectively. In the adjusted model, after adjusting for age, sex, education level, occupation, history of eye disease, history of eye surgery, history of ocular trauma, history of systemic disease, family history of KC, the time of eye use and myopia age, the β (95% CI) of BMI and the time of eye rubbing were 0.923 (0.112, 1.733) (p = 0.026) and 3.356 (1.953, 4.759) (p < 0.001), respectively.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Estimated effect of BMI and the time of eye rubbing on KC risk were analyzed by generalized linear models. The adjusted model was adjusted for age, sex, education level, occupation, history of eye disease, history of eye surgery, history of ocular trauma, history of systemic disease, family history of KC, the time of eye use and myopia age. The dots and lines exhibit the β and corresponding 95% confidence interval of the associations between BMI and the time of eye rubbing and KC risk

Full size image

Interactive effect of BMI and the time of eye rubbing on KC

Figure 4 shows the estimated effect of the time of eye rubbing on KC with increasing BMI. The positive association between the time of eye rubbing and KC was strengthened as BMI increased.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Estimated effects of the time of eye rubbing on KC risk as a function of BMI were analyzed by using generalized linear models after adjusting for age, sex, education level, occupation, history of eye disease, history of eye surgery, history of ocular trauma, history of systemic disease, family history of KC, the time of eye use and myopia age. The blue lines and grey areas represent the estimated effect and 95% confidence interval of the time of eye rubbing on KC risk along with altered values of BMI (kg/m2)

Full size image

Discussion

Investigating the associations between environmental factors and KC is helpful for understanding the mechanisms of disease and is meaningful for taking early intervention measurements to avoid the occurrence of KC [3]. In the present study, BMI and the time of eye rubbing were positively associated with KC. Furthermore, the positive association between the time of eye rubbing and KC were strengthened as BMI increased.

The present study found that BMI is a risk factor for KC, which confirmed the results of a population-based cross-sectional study [9]. The study reported that obese and overweight adolescents had a higher prevalence of KC than normal weight adolescents, and the positive correlation between BMI and KC remained after adjustment for potential confounders [9]. Furthermore, a case control study in the United States reported that 50 KC patients had a high BMI value (32.4 kg/m2) and a higher rate of obesity (52%) than the national prevalence of 33.8% [21]. However, several studies failed to demonstrate a significant association between BMI and KC. No significant association was found between BMI and increased severity of KC in Australian patients [22]. A case‒controlled multicenter study in a Turkish population found that the mean BMI values in both the KC and control groups were within normal ranges [15]. No significant difference was found between KC and non-KC subjects in an Iran study [17]. Slater JA et al. [23] reported a ratio of 5% KC in 60 obese patients awaiting bariatric surgery, with a 100-fold increased prevalence compared with the overall population (0.05%), although the difference was not statistically significant due to the small sample size. The inconsistency of the associations between BMI and KC could be attributed to differences in race, population, study design and diagnostic criteria, and further multicenter and unified studies need to be carried out in the future.

The mechanisms underlying the association between obesity and KC are still unclear. A previous study proposed that obesity might decrease elastin in the tarsal plate, which leads to weaker eyelid skin and in turn decreases eyelid function in protecting the cornea [9]. Several studies have reported that inflammation plays roles in the occurrence of obesity and KC [24,25,26]. With the occurrence of obesity, the immune cells in adipose tissue infiltrate and produce inflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL), and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), promoting local or systemic inflammatory responses [24, 25]. These increases in inflammatory exposure in adipose tissue in the obese state also occur in the liver, pancreas, airway, brain, muscle, and possibly endothelial cells, inducing tissue damage and further leading to diabetes, asthma, liver disease, retinopathy, nephropathy, and cardiovascular disease [25, 27, 28]. This metabolic inflammatory state is chronic, with chronic maintenance of the inflammatory state without apparent resolution [25, 29]. Thus, the chronic inflammation induced by obesity may cause changes in eye inflammation, leading to chronic corneal injury, which may underlie the association between obesity and KC [26, 28, 30]. However, the hypothesis should be improved and further validated through animal studies in the future. In addition, sleep apnea may play a role in the association between obesity and KC. Obesity is regarded as one of the strongest risk factors for sleep apnea [31, 32]. Additionally, sleep apnea was also found to be significantly associated with KC [33, 34]. The collapse of the upper airways and hypoxia injuries in sleep apnea patients affect collagen tissue, corneal mechanical stability, the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and inflammatory mediators, which implicated in the development of KC [33,34,35,36]. The associations among obesity, KC and sleep apnea are not clearly defined, and further research is necessary.

BMI can increase the risk of KC, but the results also indicated that the time of eye rubbing was positively associated with KC. Several studies have also suggested that the longer eye rubbing times were related to an increased risk of KC [37,38,39,40]. Furthermore, another study showed that eye rubbing is a benign activity when it occurs sporadically due to eye itch and fatigue before sleep or waking. However, when it is performed too frequently or vigorously, eye rubbing becomes pathological and damages the cornea [41]. The underlying mechanisms of eye rubbing related to an increased risk for KC may involve various aspects [42]. First, persistent eye rubbing can lead to corneal trauma [43]. Second, the corneal temperature increases as a consequence of rubbing [44]. Third, rubbing-related collagen fibrils may change cone formation and corneal biomechanical stability [45]. Fourth, the damaged epithelium could cause cytokine release, myofibroblast differentiation, and changes in corneal shape and corneal biomechanical forces [46]. Finally, eye rubbing with a high frequency traumatizes keratocytes, which could lead to an inflammatory response and cause KC pathogenesis [44, 47, 48]. Eye rubbing has been widely investigated in KC, but the exact pathophysiology between eye rubbing and KC is still unclear and should be explored.

The interactive analysis showed that BMI could strengthen the association between the time of eye rubbing and KC. Obesity may lead to reduced eyelids and elastin [9], and when eye rubbing occurs, it will aggravate the damage to the cornea from eye rubbing. Moreover, the body is in a state of low-degree inflammation under conditions of obesity, which is closely related to the chronic tissue injury, and when eye rubbing causes eye inflammation, it may enhance the eye inflammatory response and further cause KC [25, 26]. In addition, the chronic habits of abnormal rubbing are relevant to corneal mechanical trauma, which triggers the release of inflammatory mediators and is accompanied by a wound healing response in keratocytes, and then facilitates cone formation [44, 48]. Both inflammation and corneal mechanical trauma were mediated in the process of eye rubbing and under conditions of obesity, which may explain the positive association between KC and the interactive effect of BMI and eye rubbing [25, 26, 30].

This case‒control study demonstrated that BMI strengthened the association between the time of eye rubbing and KC. However, several limitations should be noted. First, information about eye friction was obtained through questionnaires, which may be related to recall bias. However, all the steps were performed through standardized procedures. Second, the subjects were from the same tertiary hospital. Although patients and control individuals were matched according to some factors, extrapolation of the findings was limited and needs to be validated in a multicenter study. Third, the habit of rubbing eyes is also related to the strength and way of rubbing the eyes (knuckles and fingertips, etc.). This study only evaluated the relationship between eye rubbing time and KC. The evaluation of eye rubbing should be improved in future studies.

Conclusion

The results indicated that the time of eye rubbing was correlated with an increased risk of KC, and those associations were strengthened by a high BMI. These findings imply that individuals with a high BMI may be more susceptible to exposure to eye rubbing, which is related to an increased risk of KC.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper. Contact to Kaili Yang (kelly1992abc@163.com) for additional information regarding data access.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

KC:

Keratoconus

CI:

Confidence interval

SD:

Standard deviation

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

IL:

Interleukin

CCL2:

C-C motif chemokine ligand 2

MMPs:

Matrix metalloproteinases

References

  1. Ferrari G, Rama P. The keratoconus enigma: a review with emphasis on pathogenesis. Ocul Surf. 2020;18(3):363–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Soiberman U, Foster JW, Jun AS, Chakravarti S. Pathophysiology of Keratoconus: what do we know today. open Ophthalmol J. 2017;11:252–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Hooshmand E, Saatchi M, Yekta A, Aghamirsalim M, Valadkhan M, Mortazavi M, Hashemi A, Khabazkhoob M. The prevalence and risk factors for Keratoconus: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Cornea. 2020;39(2):263–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Godefrooij DA, de Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, Imhof SM, Wisse RP. Age-specific incidence and prevalence of Keratoconus: a Nationwide Registration Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:169–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Yekta A, Ostadimoghaddam H, Aghamirsalim M, Derakhshan A, Khabazkhoob M. High prevalence and familial aggregation of keratoconus in an Iranian rural population: a population-based study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38(4):447–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, Belin MW, Ambrosio R Jr., Guell JL, Malecaze F, Nishida K, Sangwan VS. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic Diseases. Cornea. 2015;34(4):359–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bykhovskaya Y, Rabinowitz YS. Update on the genetics of keratoconus. Exp Eye Res. 2021;202:108398.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Debourdeau E, Planells G, Chamard C, Touboul D, Villain M, Demoly P, Babeau F, Fournie P, Daien V. New Keratoconus Risk factors: a cross-sectional case-control study. J Ophthalmol. 2022;2022:6605771.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Eliasi E, Bez M, Megreli J, Avramovich E, Fischer N, Barak A, Levine H. The Association between Keratoconus and Body Mass Index: a Population-based cross-sectional study among half a million adolescents. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;224:200–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang Y, Li S, Liu C, Xu M, Shi S, Liu Y. Accelerated epithelium-off corneal cross-linking with high Ultraviolet Energy dose (7.2 J/cm(2)) for Progressive Keratoconus: 2-Year results in a Chinese Population. J Refractive Surg (Thorofare NJ: 1995). 2020;36(11):731–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lo ACQ, Lo CCW. The association between keratoconus and the risk factors of eye rubbing, atopy and other allergic Diseases (conjunctivitis, rhinitis, Asthma and eczema): a meta-analysis. Int Ophthalmol. 2023;43(5):1451–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng WY, Yang SY, Huang XY, Zi FY, Li HP, Sheng XL. Identification of genetic variants in five Chinese families with keratoconus: pathogenicity analysis and characteristics of parental corneal topography. Front Genet. 2022;13:978684.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sorbara L, Lopez JCL, Gorbet M, Bizheva K, Lamarca JM, Pastor JC, Maldonado López MJ, Hileeto D. Impact of contact lens wear on epithelial alterations in keratoconus. J Optometry. 2021;14(1):37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang K, Li D, Xu L, Pang C, Zhao D, Ren S. Independent and interactive effects of eye rubbing and atopy on keratoconus. Front Immunol. 2022;13:999435.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gencer B, Ozgurhan EB, Kara S, Tufan HA, Arikan S, Bozkurt E, Demirok A. Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea in patients with keratoconus in a Turkish population. Cornea. 2014;33(2):137–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pedrotti E, Demasi CL, Fasolo A, Bonacci E, Brighenti T, Gennaro N, Ferrari M, Marchini G. Obstructive sleep apnea assessed by overnight polysomnography in patients with Keratoconus. Cornea. 2018;37(4):470–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohaghegh S, Kangari H, Masoumi SJ, Bamdad S, Rahmani S, Abdi S, Fazil N, Shahbazi S. Prevalence and risk factors of keratoconus (including oxidative stress biomarkers) in a cohort study of Shiraz university of medical science employees in Iran. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023;23(1):188.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang K, Gu Y, Xu L, Fan Q, Zhu M, Wang Q, Yin S, Zhang B, Pang C, Ren S. Distribution of pediatric keratoconus by different age and gender groups. Front Pead. 2022;10:937246.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang K, Xu L, Fan Q, Gu Y, Zhang B, Meng F, Zhao D, Pang C, Ren S. A hospital-based study on clinical data, demographic data and visual function of keratoconus patients in Central China. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):7559.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, Belin MW, Ambrosio R Jr., Guell JL, Malecaze F, Nishida K, Sangwan VS. Group of panelists for the Global Delphi Panel of K et al: global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic Diseases. Cornea. 2015;34(4):359–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pihlblad MS, Schaefer DP. Eyelid laxity, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea in keratoconus. Cornea. 2013;32(9):1232–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sahebjada S, Chan E, Xie J, Snibson GR, Daniell M, Baird PN. Risk factors and association with severity of keratoconus: the Australian study of Keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(3):891–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Slater JA, Misra SL, Braatvedt G, McGhee CN. Keratoconus and obesity: can high body mass alter the shape of the cornea? Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2018.

  24. Cox AJ, West NP, Cripps AW. Obesity, inflammation, and the gut microbiota. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2015;3(3):207–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gregor MF, Hotamisligil GS. Inflammatory mechanisms in obesity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;29:415–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McMonnies CW. Inflammation and keratoconus. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2015;92(2):e35–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peters U, Dixon AE, Forno E. Obesity and Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(4):1169–79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Rohm TV, Meier DT, Olefsky JM, Donath MY. Inflammation in obesity, Diabetes, and related disorders. Immunity. 2022;55(1):31–55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Graupera M, Claret M. Endothelial cells: new players in obesity and related metabolic disorders. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29(11):781–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lema I, Duran JA. Inflammatory molecules in the tears of patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4):654–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mehra R, Redline S. Sleep apnea: a proinflammatory disorder that coaggregates with obesity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121(5):1096–102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bonsignore MR. Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2022;274:181–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pellegrini M, Bernabei F, Friehmann A, Giannaccare G. Obstructive sleep apnea and Keratoconus: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology = Albrecht Von Graefes Archiv fur Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2020;97(1):9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Naderan M, Rezagholizadeh F, Zolfaghari M, Naderan M, Rajabi MT, Kamaleddin MA. Association between the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea and the severity of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(12):1675–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nadarajah S, Samsudin A, Ramli N, Tan CT, Mimiwati Z. Corneal hysteresis is reduced in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2017;94(10):981–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shetty R, Ghosh A, Lim RR, Subramani M, Mihir K, Reshma AR, Ranganath A, Nagaraj S, Nuijts RM, Beuerman R, et al. Elevated expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and inflammatory cytokines in keratoconus patients is inhibited by cyclosporine A. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(2):738–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mazharian A, Panthier C, Courtin R, Jung C, Rampat R, Saad A, Gatinel D. Incorrect sleeping position and eye rubbing in patients with unilateral or highly asymmetric keratoconus: a case-control study. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology = Albrecht Von Graefes Archiv fur Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2020;258(11):2431–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dimacali V, Balidis M, Adamopoulou A, Kozei A, Kozeis N. A case of early Keratoconus Associated with Eye rubbing in a young child. Ophthalmol Therapy. 2020;9(3):667–76.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shinzawa M, Kato N, Kasai K, Konomi K, Chai Y, Shimazaki J. Corneal cross-linking for keratoconus caused by compulsive eye rubbing in patients with Tourette syndrome: three case reports. Medicine. 2019;98(20):e15658.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Najmi H, Mobarki Y, Mania K, Altowairqi B, Basehi M, Mahfouz MS, Elmahdy M. The correlation between keratoconus and eye rubbing: a review. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12(11):1775–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. McMonnies CW. The evidentiary significance of case reports: eye rubbing and keratoconus. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2008;85(4):262–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sahebjada S, Al-Mahrouqi HH, Moshegov S, Panchatcharam SM, Chan E, Daniell M, Baird PN. Eye rubbing in the aetiology of keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology = Albrecht Von Graefes Archiv fur Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2021;259(8):2057–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rabinowitz YS, Galvis V, Tello A, Rueda D, García JD. Genetics vs chronic corneal mechanical trauma in the etiology of keratoconus. Exp Eye Res. 2021;202:108328.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. McMonnies CW. Mechanisms of rubbing-related corneal trauma in keratoconus. Cornea. 2009;28(6):607–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. McMonnies CW, Korb DR, Blackie CA. The role of heat in rubbing and massage-related corneal deformation. Contact lens & Anterior eye: The Journal of the British Contact Lens Association. 2012;35(4):148–54.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gritz DC, McDonnell PJ. Keratoconus and ocular massage. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;106(6):757–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Balasubramanian SA, Pye DC, Willcox MD. Effects of eye rubbing on the levels of protease, protease activity and cytokines in tears: relevance in keratoconus. Clin Experimental Optometry. 2013;96(2):214–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. McMonnies CW, Alharbi A, Boneham GC. Epithelial responses to rubbing-related mechanical forces. Cornea. 2010;29(11):1223–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participants of this study and Nature Research Editing Service (https://authorservices.springernature.com/) for English language editing assistance.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81200664), Henan Natural Science Foundation (No. 222300420536), Henan Provincial Medical Science Building Key Program (No. SBGJ202002028, SBGJ202102051, SBGJ202303043), Henan Young Health Science and Technology Innovation Outstanding Program (No. YXKC2020023), Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project (No. 222102310599, 222102310307), Special Program for Basic Research of Henan Eye Hospital (No. 20JCZD003), Youth Special Program for Basic Research of Henan Eye Hospital (No. 21JCQN006, 21JCQN008). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, Henan Eye Institute, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, China

    Shengwei Ren, Runqi Tu, Liyan Xu, Yuwei Gu, Qi Fan, Qing Wang, Meng Zhu, Shanshan Yin, Chenjiu Pang, Dongqing Zhao & Kaili Yang

Authors
  1. Shengwei Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Runqi Tu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liyan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuwei Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qi Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Meng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shanshan Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chenjiu Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dongqing Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kaili Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Concept and design: Shengwei Ren, Kaili Yang. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Shengwei Ren, Yuwei Gu, Liyan Xu, Chenjiu Pang, Dongqing Zhao, Qing Wang, Meng Zhu, Shanshan Yin. Drafting of the manuscript: Shengwei Ren, Runqi Tu. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors. Statistical analysis: Runqi Tu, Liyan Xu, Kaili Yang. Obtained funding: Shengwei Ren, Kaili Yang, Liyan Xu, Dongqing Zhao. Administrative, technical, or material support: Runqi Tu, Qi Fan, Yuwei Gu, Liyan Xu, Chenjiu Pang, Dongqing Zhao, Qing Wang, Meng Zhu, Shanshan Yin. Supervision: Shengwei Ren, Chenjiu Pang, Dongqing Zhao, Kaili Yang.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaili Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from the “Institutional Review Board of Henan Eye Hospital” (Ethic approval code: HNEECKY-2019 (5)) and written informed consent was obtained from all participants before this study. All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors had declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, S., Tu, R., Xu, L. et al. A high body mass index strengthens the association between the time of eye rubbing and keratoconus in a Chinese population: a case control study. BMC Public Health 23, 2032 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16937-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16937-5

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us