Skip to main content

Developing a Health Equity Impact Assessment ‘Indigenous Lens Tool’ to address challenges in providing equitable cancer screening for indigenous peoples

Abstract

Background

In spite of past efforts to increase screening uptake, the rates of screening-detectable cancers including breast, cervical, colorectal and lung are rising among Indigenous persons in Ontario compared to other Ontarians. The Ontario Ministry of Health has an equity framework, the Health Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) Tool, that was developed to guide organizations in the provision of more equitable health and social services. Although the HEIA Tool identifies that the health of Indigenous persons may benefit from more equitable provision of health and social services, it provides very little specific guidance on how to apply the HEIA Tool in a culturally relevant way to policies and programs that may impact Indigenous peoples.

Discussion

Guided by the Calls to Action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, an Indigenous Lens Tool was developed through a collaborative and iterative process with stakeholders at Cancer Care Ontario and with representatives from Indigenous community-based organizations. The Indigenous Lens Tool consists of four scenarios, with supporting documentation that provide context for each step of the HEIA Tool and thereby facilitate application of the equity framework to programs and policies. The document is in no way meant to be comprehensive or representative of the diverse health care experiences of Indigenous peoples living in Canada nor the social determinants that surround health and well-being of Indigenous peoples living in Canada. Rather, this document provides a first step to support development of policies and programs that recognize and uphold the rights to health and well-being of Indigenous peoples living in Canada.

Conclusions

The Indigenous Lens Tool was created to facilitate implementation of an existing health equity framework within Cancer Care Ontario (now Ontario Health). Even though the Indigenous Lens Tool was created for this purpose, the principles contained within it are translatable to other health and social service policy applications.

Peer Review reports

Background

While historically uncommon in Indigenous populations in Ontario, Canada, cancer is now a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. For many ‘screening-detectable’ cancers (i.e., breast, cervical, colorectal and lung) in Ontario, the incidence appears either to be rising or above that of other Ontarians and the survival rate appears to be worse for First Nations, Inuit and Métis (FNIM) persons compared to other Ontarians [1,2,3,4,5,6].

Routine cancer screening for these four cancers can improve cancer health outcomes [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], including cancer-related death. In Ontario, there are organized cancer screening programs for breast, cervix and colorectal cancer and in 2021, an organized lung cancer screening program in high-risk persons was launched. Organized cancer screening aims to deliver high quality screening to the entire target population in a coordinated fashion that is integrated into the broader health care system [15]. At the start of the work described in this paper, Cancer Care Ontario (CCO), an agency of the provincial government of Ontario, was responsible for overseeing the province’s organized cancer screening programs. In 2019, CCO was incorporated into Ontario Health. Ontario Health is an umbrella agency intended to administer and integrate key components of Ontario’s health care system.

In 2014, a research program was undertaken with the aim of increasing cancer screening participation in Indigenous communities in Ontario by understanding the health system, community and individual factors that impact access to and uptake of cancer screening. The research project was comprised of three aims: (1) An analysis of policies relevant to cancer screening in Indigenous peoples in Ontario [16]; (2) An analysis of the outcomes of previous projects within CCO to improve screening in under-screened and never-screened individuals; and (3) Community engagement to understand local factors that impact uptake of cancer screening [17, 18]. An overarching theme that arose from this research program was the lack of application of an Indigenous lens and the lack of an equity focus in most aspects of the cancer screening system.

The Ontario Ministry of Health has an existing equity framework, the Health Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) Tool, that was developed to guide organizations in the provision of more equitable health and social services [19]. Although the HEIA Tool identifies Indigenous peoples living in Ontario as a population that may benefit from more equitable provision of health and social services, it provides very little specific guidance on how to apply the HEIA Tool in a culturally relevant way to policies and programs that may impact Indigenous peoples. Furthermore, the HEIA Tool treats Indigenous peoples as a uniform group rather than recognizing that there is diversity within First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities. As a result, the research team developed an Indigenous Lens Tool supplement to the HEIA Tool to address the gaps in the existing guidance.

Main text

Indigenous ways of knowing

Prior to colonization, Indigenous peoples in Canada had established knowledge systems, cultural practices, values and beliefs. This included a rich diversity of knowledges and practices that promoted well-being. Colonization interrupted and de-valued these traditional ways of knowing [20, 21]. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Call to Action 18 challenges us, through public institutions, to affirm Indigenous peoples’ rights to health care including health care based on traditional belief systems [22]. TRC Principle 5 challenges us to “create a more equitable and inclusive society by closing gaps in social, health, and economic outcomes that exist between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Canadians”. TRC Principle 7 affirms the value of “the perspectives and understandings of Aboriginal Elders and Traditional Knowledge Keepers of the ethics, concepts and practices of reconciliation” [23].

In keeping with the spirit of reconciliation, health equity models and assessment tools targeted for use with Indigenous peoples must be inclusive of Indigenous knowledges and values regarding health and well-being. For example, wholism, reciprocity, resiliency, inter-dependency, respect, collectivity and relationality are values that are represented in many distinct Indigenous worldviews and may not be well reflected in or compatible with a person-centered, individualistic approach to health equity. Several documents, grounded in Indigenous worldviews, provided the foundational framework for the development of the HEIA Indigenous Lens Tool (Table 1).

Table 1 Guiding documents

Often the terms’ Aboriginal’ and ‘Indigenous’ are used interchangeably in the ‘grey’ literature. The term ‘Indigenous’ is often preferred by academics as well as many First Nations, Inuit and Métis people in the current environment as it is aligned with a relationship to the land and legal rights as identified in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). However, some situate their identity more specifically by their tribal affiliation. For example, Ojibwe or Cree from a specific treaty area or land base. However, in Canada, the term Aboriginal is enshrined in the constitution. As a result, the term Aboriginal has been used when referring to legal documents or when it has been used in a source document.

Organizational awareness, allyship and decolonization

A key to understanding the impact of past efforts to increase screening, was the need to understand the cultural context in which those programs and policies were created. Organizations have cultures, which exist within, and are shaped by, the broader dominant culture. Organizational culture can be understood as the visible artifacts (e.g., architecture, language used, dress codes), shared values (e.g., organizational goals, strategies), and basic assumptions (e.g., taken for granted beliefs, perceptions) of an organization [24]. When an organization creates policies or provides services, the organization “often unconsciously exclude[s] others who don’t share the cultural frame of mind from which we operate [25].” Acknowledging that the culture of an individual and the culture of an organization affect decision-making is the first step to developing more equitable programs and policies. The process whereby one reflects on their relationship with Indigenous peoples living in Canada is the first step towards Indigenous allyship. The critical self-reflection that is a key component of allyship is also a step on the pathway to developing cultural humility – a commitment to reflecting on one’s own culture while learning about Indigenous cultures. Through allyship and cultural humility, one is able to move towards decolonization, support Indigenization and achieve meaningful reconciliation (Table 2) [26,27,28]. This journey to allyship and cultural humility varies for each of the authors as we include Indigenous women (AK and BD), settler women of European descent (LS and JT) and an immigrant woman of mixed African and European descent (NJ).

Table 2 Definitions from allyship to reconciliation

Nothing for us without us – facilitating an indigenous review process

The HEIA Indigenous Lens Tool [29] was developed through a collaborative and iterative process with stakeholders at CCO and with representatives from Indigenous community-based organizations. The Indigenous Cancer Care Unit (ICCU) at CCO served as the reference organization during the development of the tool. The ICCU works closely with Regional Indigenous Cancer Leads and Indigenous Cancer Navigators in all regions of Ontario who are experts in the provision of cancer care to Indigenous persons in the province. Additionally, the Joint Ontario Indigenous Cancer Committee (JOICC) provides guidance and advice to CCO with the aim of decreasing the incidence of cancer among Indigenous peoples living in Ontario. The committee is made up of Indigenous representatives from Ontario Political Territorial Organizations and provincial Indigenous organizations, Indigenous Elders and Knowledge Keepers who provide spiritual guidance and support, and members from CCO and Canadian Cancer Society [30, 31]. These representatives and organizations (N = 55 individuals) contributed to the development of the tool through virtual document sharing and a series of web-based or in person meetings. It is anticipated that the integration of the HEIA Indigenous Lens Tool into CCO operations will be facilitated by these stakeholders, who are embedded into CCO operations through the ICCU.

Application of the HEIA Indigenous Lens Tool

This Indigenous Lens Tool is positioned as a supplement to the HEIA Tool and as such provides a framework to think about and understand health equity for Indigenous peoples living in Canada. The document is in no way meant to be comprehensive or representative of the diverse health care experiences of Indigenous peoples living in Canada. Nor does it provide a comprehensive representation of the social determinants that surround health and well-being of Indigenous peoples living in Canada. Indeed, the concepts of equity presented here and in the HEIA Tool, as well as foundational concepts to equity such as the social determinants of health, need be to be recognized as Western or colonial constructs and not reflective of concepts of well-being and inter-relatedness of individuals, families, communities, and the environment that are common among many Indigenous knowledge systems. Rather, this document provides a first step to support development of policies and programs that recognize and uphold the rights of Indigenous peoples living in Canada to health and well-being.

Four scenarios, with supporting documentation, were developed to bring an Indigenous lens to the principles outlined in the HEIA Tool (Supplement and Table 3). These scenarios are in no way meant to replace meaningful engagement with Indigenous peoples and they are in no way meant to be comprehensive or representative of complex and varied experiences of diverse Indigenous peoples. Rather, the scenarios intend to provide context for each step of the HEIA Tool using fictitious examples and thereby facilitate application of the equity framework to programs and policies in the organizations using the tools. In the Indigenous Lens Tool, each scenario is followed by a discussion of the steps in the HEIA Tool that were highlighted in that scenario as well as tips and resources that may be useful.

Table 3 Summary of Indigenous Lens Tool scenarios

Conclusions

The purpose of creating an Indigenous Lens Tool is to provide additional guidance when thinking about equity, health and Indigenous peoples. It is intended as a support for those using the HEIA Tool in further engaging with diverse Indigenous health experiences and perspectives, so they can more effectively identify and consider unintended impacts of initiatives on health and wellbeing of Indigenous peoples. In particular, this supplement to the HEIA Tool was developed to provide an Indigenous lens to view equity as it relates to policy and program development at CCO – an organization that identified health equity as an important strategic objective in the Ontario Cancer Plan V [30]. That being said, the principles described in this document are also relevant to Ontario Health, which has developed its own Equity, Inclusion, Diversity and Anti-Racism Framework [32], and other health and social service applications. However, to truly understand equity from diverse Indigenous perspectives, more rigorous and comprehensive Nation-specific analyses and tools that are initiated, developed and disseminated by Indigenous peoples, communities and Nations themselves are required. The Indigenous Lens Tool supplement to the HEIA Tool serves as a placeholder until more culturally relevant equity resources are available.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CCO:

Cancer Care Ontario

FNIM:

First Nations, Inuit and Métis

HEIA:

Health Equity Impact Assessment

ICCU:

Indigenous Cancer Care Unit

JOICC:

Joint Indigenous Cancer Committee

TRC:

Truth and Reconciliation Commission

References

  1. Peters P, Tjepkema M. Canadian census mortality and cancer follow-up study. Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marrett LD, Chaudhry M. Cancer incidence and mortality in Ontario First Nations, 1968–1991 (Canada). Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14(3):259–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiefs of Ontario, Cancer Care Ontario, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. Cancer in First Nations People in Ontario: Incidence, Mortality, Survival and Prevalence. Toronto; 2017.

  4. Klein-Geltink J, Saskin R, Manno M, Urbach DR, Henry DA. Métis Nation of Ontario. Cancer in the Métis Nation of Ontario: Technical Report. Ottawa: Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tjepkema M, Wilkins R, Senécal S, Guimond É, Penney C. Mortality of Métis and registered Indian adults in Canada: an 11-year follow-up study. Health Rep. 2009;20(4):31–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nishri ED, Sheppard AJ, Withrow DR, Marrett LD. Cancer survival among First Nations people of Ontario, Canada (1968–2007). Int J Cancer. 2015;136(3):639–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L. Effectiveness of breast cancer screening: systematic review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):244–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lauby–Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Benbrahim–Tallaa L, Bouvard V, Bianchini F, et al. Breast-cancer screening — viewpoint of the IARC working group the New England. J Med. 2015;372(24):2353–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health C. Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer. Can Med Assoc J. 2013;185(1):35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health C. Recommendations on screening for lung cancer. Can Med Assoc J. 2016;188(6):425–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40–74 years. CMAJ. 2011;183(17):1957–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations on screening for colorectal cancer in primary care. CMAJ. 2016;188(5):340–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cancer Care O. Ontario Cervical Screening Program 2012 Report. Toronto: Cancer Care Ontario; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tinmouth J, Vella E, Baxter N, Dube C, Gould M, Hey A, et al. Colorectal cancer screening in average risk populations: evidence summary. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:2878149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Miles A, Cockburn J, Smith RA, Wardle J. A perspective from countries using organized screening programs. Cancer. 2004;101(S5):1201–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tobias JK, Tinmouth J, Senese LC, Jumah N, Llovet D, Kewayosh A, et al. Health Policy as a barrier to First Nations Peoples’ Access to Cancer Screening. Healthc Policy. 2020;15(3):28–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Métis Cancer Screening Research Project Team. Increasing Cancer Screening in the Métis Nation of Ontario: Final Report from the Métis Cancer Screening Research Project. Ottawa; 2021.

  18. Wequedong Lodge Cancer Screening Research Project Team. Wequedong Lodge Cancer Screening Research Project: Full Research Report. Thunder Bay; 2022.

  19. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). Health Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) Tool and Workbook Toronto, ON. 2012. Available from: https://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/heia/tool.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smylie J, Firestone M. The Health of Indigenous Peoples. In: Raphael D, editor. Social Determinants of Health: Canadian perspectives. 3rd ed. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc; 2016. p. 434–66.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Greenwood M, de Leeuw S, Lindsay NM, Reading C. Determinants of Indigenous peoples’ health in Canada: beyond the Social. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada Winnipeg, MB. 2015. Available from: https://ehprnh2mwo3.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. What We Have Learned: Principles of Truth and Reconciliation Winnipeg, M. 2015. Available from: https://ehprnh2mwo3.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Principles_English_Web.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schien E. Organizational culture and leadership. 4th ed. San Franscisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nova Scotia Health Authority. Diversity Lens Toolkit: A set of practical cultural-competence assessment tools and resources to help integrate diversity in Nova Scotia Health Authority workplaces. 2016. Available from: https://physicians.nshealth.ca/sites/default/files/2022-03/diversity-lens-tool-kit__2_.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hyett S, Marjerrison S, Gabel C. Improving health research among Indigenous peoples in Canada. CMAJ. 2018;190(20):E616-e621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Swiftwolfe D, Shaw L. Indigenous Ally Toolkit Montreal, QC Montreal Urban Aboriginal Community Strategy Network. 2019. Available from: https://reseaumtlnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Ally_March.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Antoine A, Mason R, Palahicky S, Rodriguez de France C. Indigenization. Decolonization, and Reconciliation in Pulling Together: A Guide for Curriculum Developers. 2019. Available from: https://opentextbc.ca/indigenizationcurriculumdevelopers/chapter/indigenization-decolonization-and-reconciliation/.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ontario Health. Health Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) – Indigenous Lens Tool. 2023. Available from: https://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/heia/docs/HEIA_Indigenous_lens_tool.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cancer Care Ontario. Ontario Cancer Plan, Toronto V. ON 2019. Available from: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/cancerplan.

  31. Cancer Care Ontario. Joint Cancer Care Ontario Indigenous Cancer Committee. Available from: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/cancer-care-ontario/programs/aboriginal-programs/joint-cancer-care-aboriginal-committee.

  32. Ontario Health. Equity, Inclusion, Diversity and Anti-Racism Framework Toronto, ON. 2022. Available from: https://www.ontariohealth.ca/sites/ontariohealth/files/2020-12/Equity%20Framework.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The team would like to acknowledge the Indigenous community members and organizations that contributed to the development of this resource, including Regional Indigenous Cancer Navigators, Coordinators and Leads across the province, the Joint Ontario Cancer Care Committee (with representation from Ontario Political Territorial Organizations and Provincial Indigenous Organizations) and Indigenous policy stakeholders.

Funding

The study received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Partnership for Health Improvement grant to develop the Indigenous Lens Tool. NAJ received salary support from the PSI Foundation Graham Farquharson Knowledge Translation Fellowship. The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, nor in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the development of the Indigenous Lens Tool. N.A.J. wrote the manuscript. All authors edited and revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naana Afua Jumah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

and Consent: Research ethics board approval was obtained through Sunnybrook Research Institute’s Research Ethics Office, the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board and Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada Research Ethics Board. There were no participants involved in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jumah, N.A., Kewayosh, A., Downey, B. et al. Developing a Health Equity Impact Assessment ‘Indigenous Lens Tool’ to address challenges in providing equitable cancer screening for indigenous peoples. BMC Public Health 23, 2250 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16919-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16919-7

Keywords