Skip to main content
Download PDF

Social and emotional wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Aboriginal controlled social housing

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 1935 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the wellbeing and aspirations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in social housing. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in social housing face common social housing challenges of low income, higher incidence of mental health issues and poorer health along with specific challenges due to the impacts of colonisation and its ongoing manifestations in racism and inequity. A greater understanding of social and emotional wellbeing needs and aspirations is essential in informing the provision of appropriate support.

Methods

Surveys of social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB) were completed by 95 Aboriginal people aged 16 years and older living in Aboriginal Housing Victoria social housing in 2021. The survey addressed a range of domains reflecting social and emotional wellbeing, as defined by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Results

Most respondents demonstrated a strong sense of identity and connection to family however 26% reported having 6 or more health conditions. Ill health and disability were reported to be employment barriers for almost a third of people (32%). Improving health and wellbeing (78%) was the most cited aspiration. Experiences of racism and ill health influenced engagement with organisations and correspondingly education and employment.

Conclusion

Strong connections to identity, family and culture in Aboriginal peoples living in social housing coexist along with disrupted connections to mind, body and community. Culturally safe and appropriate pathways to community services and facilities can enhance these connections. Research aimed at evaluating the impact of strengths-based interventions that focus on existing strong connections will be important in understanding whether this approach is effective in improving SEWB in this population.

Trial Registration

: This trial was retrospectively registered with the ISRCTN Register on the 12/7/21 with the study ID:ISRCTN33665735.

Peer Review reports

Background

Secure affordable housing is fundamental to providing stability and security for individuals and families [1]. In Australia, social housing is provided by government (public housing) or community sector organisations (community housing) to people on low incomes, especially those at risk of homelessness or family violence. Due to limited housing stock, social housing residents are prioritised according to need [2]. Residents may experience a range of stressors such as unemployment, poor physical or mental health or disability which can impact their wellbeing [2, 3]. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in social housing face additional challenges and stressors due to the impacts of colonisation and dislocation, and their ongoing manifestations in racism and inequity [4, 5]. The complex and multiple needs of some Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are evident in high rates of mental and physical health issues, social exclusion, trauma, family breakdown, psychological distress and personal safety fears [4, 6,7,8].

A body of literature exists on the wellbeing and needs of social housing tenants, however, little is known about the wellbeing, needs and aspirations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in social housing. Freund et al. [9] in an exploratory study of wellbeing needs of people living in social housing found that those who identified as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander had a higher number of wellbeing needs than those who were non-Indigenous.

Wellbeing for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples can be described by the term social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB). In this context, the term refers to multiple elements that are connected and in balance at the individual, family and community levels to contribute to wellbeing [4, 6, 10]. While communities may differ in their interpretation of SEWB, Gee et al. [11] have identified seven common elements including connection to body; mind and emotions; family and kinship; community; culture; country; and, spirituality and ancestors (see Fig. 1). This SEWB framework recognises the role of broader social determinants in shaping SEWB, such as income, employment, housing, education and access to community resources [6, 11], in addition to less recognised historical and political determinants. The latter determinants refer to the degree to which individuals, families, and whole communities/cultural groups have been able to maintain connections to land, culture, community control and self-determination, despite past and ongoing impacts of colonisation [11]. The conceptualisation of self, in this model, views the self as ‘inseparable from, and embedded within, family and community’ [11, p. 57). This understanding informs a framework to holistically understand the SEWB of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples who live in social housing.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Reprinted with permission from National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples’ Mental Health and Social and Emotional Wellbeing 2017-23 by Gee, Dudgeon, Schultz, Hart and Kelly, 2013 [12]

 A model of Social and Emotional Wellbeing.

Full size image

Identifying needs is important in planning and advocating for appropriate support services. However, it is not enough by itself. Needs can be thought of as changeable, contingent on external conditions and sometimes requiring immediate relief, whereas aspirations are aimed at self-determined positive life changes that are intrinsically motivated [13]. Aspirations provide insight into persistent desires for improving one’s current situation [13]. Hart views aspirations as the ‘kernels or precursors of many important capabilities which support human flourishing’ [14, p. 336). Understanding the aspirations of communities can inform social change, policy, action and investment [14].

This study aims to:

  • understand the social and emotional wellbeing, strengths, needs and aspirations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in Aboriginal Housing Victoria (AHV) social housing.

  • assess the characteristics of respondents to determine the representativeness of the sample in comparison to the broader AHV population.

The findings of this study will inform the implementation of a novel wellbeing intervention by AHV [15].

Methods

Study design

We conducted a survey of people living in social housing in three regions provided by AHV. AHV is an Aboriginal community-controlled organisation providing community housing to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in Victoria, Australia. In addition to core tenancy management activities, AHV provides a range of individual supports to assist a person in maintaining their tenancy along with individual and community support activities that contribute to wellbeing. Their vision is to provide appropriate, affordable housing as a pathway to better lives and stronger communities [16].

The cross-sectional survey assessed social and emotional wellbeing, strengths, needs and aspirations, and served as a tool for identifying people interested in participating in wellbeing support provided by AHV. Peer researchers conducted the survey between April and December 2021, among a voluntary response sample, using a structured questionnaire. The authors used linked administrative data related to tenancies to compare respondents with non-participants.

Ethics

The study adhered to principles of culturally safe and ethical approaches to research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities [17, 18]. Aboriginal researchers were investigators on the research team and Aboriginal advisory group members were involved with leading the project design. The study responded to a community led initiative, involved building the capabilities of local communities through the employment of peer researchers and utilised the knowledge of SEWB as defined by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. This approach reflects a decolonising research method with self-determination and empowerment integral to all aspects of the study including development and data collection [19].

This survey was part of a larger study investigating the implementation of a coaching intervention that received ethics approval from the University of Melbourne Human Ethics Committee STEM 1 on 9/2/21 (Ethics ID 2020-13595-13162-4). Peer researchers assured participants that survey data were held by university researchers and were not available to AHV staff. They also provided interested participants with a plain language statement, explained the research, and documented informed consent via the first survey question. Peer researchers provided a debriefing statement containing information about available support as some participants may be vulnerable to distress due to potential underlying mental health and/or experiences of complex or intergenerational trauma [20]. Survey participants received a $40 voucher for participating in the survey.

Survey

The survey included domains of social and emotional wellbeing relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Initially, the survey was used as part of a First 1000 days Australia initiative to describe the aspirations and needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families [21]. We modified the survey to shift the focus from parenting to include additional aspects of SEWB and trialed it with 22 Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait community members in the eastern region of Melbourne. We then shortened the survey to reduce the response burden and piloted it with five Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander. After making further amendments based on the pilot, we finalised the survey.

The survey consisted of demographic information and questions in 12 domains, as outlined in Table 1, and took between 45 and 60 min to complete. We drew survey items from established instruments, modified instruments or instruments developed by researchers or through consultation with AHV or other key stakeholders. We included only questions on psychological and emotional wellbeing from the Mental Health Continuum Short form tool [22] as questions relating to social wellbeing were not considered culturally appropriate by those reviewing the survey. The Aboriginal Resilience and Recovery Questionnaire (ARRQ) has been developed and is validated for use in the Victorian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population [23, 24].

Table 1 Survey domains
Full size table

Administrative data

AHV routinely collects administrative data on all people who live in social housing in all AHV regions. We linked administrative data to survey data via a unique identifier. We used the administrative data for analyses as well as to compare the characteristics of our survey respondents with the broader AHV social housing population. Administrative data include information on gender, household composition, housing type and a range of data that are indicative of people experiencing difficulties in life including rent in arrears, rent related maintenance charges and complaints (see Table 2).

Table 2 Administrative data collection
Full size table

Eligibility

Peer researchers invited all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples aged 16 years and over, who were living in AHV social housing in three nominated regions (Northwest metropolitan Melbourne, Greater Geelong and Ballarat) to participate in the survey via the main tenancy holder. AHV chose the three regions as a wellbeing program was being trialed in these regions.

Recruitment and survey administration

AHV employed five Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and one non – Indigenous person, including some who lived in AHV social housing, as peer researchers from local communities to recruit people to the survey. Involving peers in recruitment was important in facilitating engagement with local communities and strengthening community capacity through skill development. Successful applicants underwent a one-week training program in research, ethics and consent, confidentiality, safety, and survey conduct, as well as ongoing supervision from a team leader.

Peer researchers attempted phone contact with the main tenancy holder listed on the tenancy agreement (n = 410 households) in the three regions. They made three attempts to contact all households. They also asked the main tenancy holder if any other people aged 16 and over living at the property might like to participate in the survey.

Peer researcher initially made face to face appointments with consenting participants to explain the survey and provide the participant with a laptop to self-administer the survey. After multiple lockdowns and social restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic prevented face to face visits, most surveys were self-administered via an SMS link to a mobile phone version of the electronic survey. Peer researcher survey administration was available over the phone according to the preferences of the participant or the needs of those with low vision, literacy, access to internet or digital skills.

We collected survey data using Qualtrics and exported data to STATA for analysis by researchers at the University of Melbourne.

Analysis

We analysed survey data in STATA and used descriptive statistics to present the characteristics and SEWB of participants. We collapsed response options to several scales to simplify reporting. For example, we aggregated responses to items in the Mental Health Continuum into the percentage who reported a feeling either ‘2–3 times a week’, ‘almost everyday’ or ‘everyday’. We also aggregated responses for the Aboriginal Resilience and Recovery Questionnaire, self-determination, strength-based parenting, aspirations, and community attitudes questions and this is indicated in the results. Reporting on all responses to questions can be found in Data Supplementary File 2. We compared survey respondents with the full population of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in AHV social housing using the administrative data to determine representativeness.

Results

Response rate and respondent characteristics

We attempted to contact the tenancy holder for each of the 410 AHV properties in the regions. Tenancy holders from 90 properties participated in the survey, yielding an initial response rate of 22%, with an additional 8 people housed in these properties recruited via the tenancy holder. However, only 255 of the 410 tenancy holders were eligible or able to be contacted by peer researchers with 23 main tenants ineligible due to non-Indigenous status, 49 main tenants having wrong or disconnected contact numbers and 85 not responding to any contact made by peer researchers. The final response rate is therefore 35% of invited tenancy holders. Three respondents did not provide sufficient data beyond basic demographics and were excluded from the sample. The final sample size for survey analysis was 95 respondents (see flow chart in Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

STROBE flow chart. STROBE, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

Full size image

All survey respondents identified as Aboriginal (see Table 3).Footnote 1 Most respondents had lived in their current properties for six years or more (57.9%).

Table 3 Sample characteristics (n = 95)**
Full size table

Comparison of respondents’ characteristics against the broader AHV population

We compared housing administrative data between survey respondents (n = 85, as administrative data were not available for 6 respondents and 4 respondents did not have linkage identifiers) and the broader AHV population (n = 3,821) to provide further information on representativeness (see data supplementary file 1). The analysis revealed that survey respondents are similar to the broader AHV population on a number of dimensions except in relation to age, gender and household type where they vary significantly. Females were overrepresented in the sample (70%) compared to the broader AHV population of people living in social housing (59%)(p = 0.036). Survey respondents were significantly older with a mean age of 46 years compared with non-survey participants mean of 30 years (p < 0.0001). It was not possible to compare survey respondents with non-participants 16 years old and over as age was not recorded for some in the administrative data. In relation to household type, more than a third (34%) of survey respondents were single as compared to only a fifth (21%) of non-survey participants (p = 0.002). More survey respondents than non-survey participants were single people living in shared houses (p = 0.034). On the other hand, close to 60% of the non-survey participants were in a couple compared to 40% of the survey respondents (p < 0.001). To summarise, the sample was more likely to be female, older, single and living in shared housing compared to non-survey respondents. Importantly, survey respondents and non-survey participants did not significantly vary in terms of the proportion experiencing rent in arrears, tenancy related maintenance charges incurred, complaints made against them and housing type.

Connection to community, culture, family, and country

The survey included questions on personal, community, relationship and cultural strengths and resources and the results are presented in Table 4. Survey respondents exhibited a strong sense of identity with 80% indicating that they were proud to be Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander and 77% indicating that being Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander was an important part of who they are (either ‘a lot’ or ‘a fair bit’). Most respondents (86%) could identify their traditional country or homeland. Similarly, 80% of respondents had knowledge of their mob or mobs (e.g., clan group affiliations). Almost all respondents had been involved in some sort of cultural or community ceremony or event in the last 12 months (97%). Approximately a third of respondents (32%) indicated that they did not participate as often as they wanted in cultural and community celebrations and events due to a range of factors including affordability (33%), being too far away (27%) or a range of commitments preventing involvement (20%).

Table 4 Personal, community, relationship and cultural strengths and resources survey results
Full size table

Family was a source of strength for most people with respondents indicating they had a family that loved them even when they muck up (79%) and felt safe with their family (75%) or their partner or people close to them (73%), either ‘a lot’ or ‘a fair bit’. When asked where they felt most comfortable, respondents reported feeling most comfortable at home with their family (79%) or with other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (45%). Some respondents expressed interest in family tracing services (30%) and in reunion services (11%) reflecting that 17% of people had been removed from their family and/or placed under care of child protection services and 41% had relatives removed from family by the government.

Most respondents felt content with their life (64%), felt able to make the right choice (64%), were able to deal with problems that occurred (67%) and could adapt to changes (62%), either ’a lot’ or ‘a fair bit’. Just over half felt in control of their lives (57%) either ‘a lot’ or ‘a fair bit’. Most respondents who were parents demonstrated awareness of strength-based parenting skills with 76% agreeing or strongly agreeing with knowing the things their kids were good at, 82% being aware of their kids’ strengths, 79% showing their kids how to use strengths in different situations and 79% giving kids many opportunities to use their strengths.

Connection to body, mind, and emotions

The survey explored respondents’ connection to mind, body, and emotions through questions regarding mental and physical health, and the results are presented in Table 5; Fig. 3. Most respondents reported feeling happy (73%), interested in life (71%) and satisfied with life (63%) either a ‘few times a week’, ‘everyday’ or ‘almost everyday’ in the past month. Most respondents also demonstrated psychological wellbeing by liking their personality (70%), managing their responsibilities (78%), having warm and trusting relationships (68%), feeling confident in expressing their own ideas and opinions (72%), having opportunities to grow (67%) and feeling that their life has a sense of direction or purpose (67%) at least a few times a week in the past month. However, 28% reported high or very high levels of psychological distress as measured by the Kessler 5. Eleven % of respondents felt unsafe or afraid in the last 12 months with 8% threatened with physical harm, 7% feeling controlled or put down and 2% subject to physical harm.

Table 5 Mental Health and Family Violence
Full size table

Respondents rated their health out of a hundred on a visual analogue scale and the median was 70 (with 0 representing the worst possible health). 26% of respondents reported having six or more health conditions confirmed by a healthcare provider s (see Fig. 3). The most frequently cited health conditions were anxiety (41%), back problems (36%), asthma (36%), depression (33%) and problems with weight (30%). 61% of respondents noted problems with pain, with 38% reporting chronic pain that is always there or keeps coming back (see supplementary file 2, Health section).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Number of self-reported health conditions as advised by a doctor

Full size image

Most respondents (52%) indicated that they or someone in their house had a disability, but awareness of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) was low (45%) and only 22% indicated that the person with a disability was receiving NDIS support.

Employment, education and finances

Survey respondents were asked about social determinants of SEWB through questions related to their employment status, educational achievement and financial situation and the results are presented in Tables 3 and 6. Almost half the survey respondents (45%) had completed either a year 12 or a Certificate III qualification or above. 18% of respondents reported being in some sort of paid employment, with 24% indicating they were unable to work and 18% indicating they were out of work and looking for work (see Table 5). The main barriers to employment were ill health and disability (32%) followed by transport problems (13%) with insufficient skills and no job available, both being cited by 7% of respondents. Less than half the respondents felt they had opportunities to develop skills in the community (45%) or further their education (48%) and just over half of the respondents felt they had opportunities to work in their life, keep busy and stay involved (53%) either ‘a lot’ or ‘a fair bit’ (see ARRQ results in Table 3).

Almost half the respondents (47%) stated they did not have enough money to spend on everyday things. Most respondents (61%) had experienced problems paying bills in the last 12 months with 40% running out of money for food, clothing, or bills in the last two weeks.

Table 6 Employment barriers and finance survey results
Full size table

The wider environment: broader community, resources and services

The survey explored respondents’ feelings about the community and use of community facilities (see supplementary file 2, Culture and community, Self-determination and Cultural safety sections). Almost all respondents felt their local community was a place where all people are welcomed and valued irrespective of LGBTQ status (87%), religion or spirituality, gender (male respondents 94% and female respondents 91%) and culture (97%). However, only 35% of respondents felt the statement ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture is valued in Australia’ was ‘often’, ’usually’ or ‘always true’. Approximately a quarter of respondents felt statements that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples experience the same rights as other Australians (25%) and do not experience racial discrimination (27%) were ‘often’,’ usually’ or ‘always true’.

A third of respondents reported feeling unfairly treated at least sometimes (33%) with 24% being subjected to racial comments or jokes, 10% being followed by security while shopping and 7% feeling they hadn’t been trusted. Unfair treatment occurred in the public sphere by members of the public (14%) when applying for work (10%), social media (10%) and healthcare settings (7%). Just over half the respondents (53%) agreed with the statement that services were culturally safe was ‘often’, ‘usually’ or ‘always true’. Respondents had difficulty accessing existing services such as social security services (11%), housing services (8%) hospitals (7%) and banks and financial institutions (5%) due to appointment availability (20%), access to services limited by no internet (18%), cost (15%) and poor customer service (13%). Some respondents avoided situations because of past unfair treatment, including going to public places or events (7%), contacting healthcare professionals (6%), contacting services such as police and lawyers (5%) applying for jobs (4%) and sporting or recreational activities (4%).

Respondents felt that a community place to feel culturally safe (32%), cultural events and activities (28%), access to culturally safe employment and training opportunities (26%) and access to services such as an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (21%) would be useful in dealing with feelings of being unfairly treated. When asked specifically about a range of facilities and services that were important, 70% of respondents indicated the importance of Aboriginal services provided within mainstream services or Aboriginal controlled service (63%) but indicated less availability with 55% and 56% respectively. A gathering place was important to 53% of respondents.

Education and training support such as subsidies and grants (21%) and homework assistance and tutoring were valued by survey respondents along with opportunities for children to participate in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander arts (30%) and language (27%).

Housing conditions

As shown in Table 7, most respondents indicated that their rental property felt like home (60%) and indicated that their house was at least adequate for their needs (73%). Most households had a range of common appliances with 21% indicating their appliances were not in good working order. Only 40% of respondents had a computer and 46% had internet connection.

Table 7 Housing conditions survey results
Full size table

Aspirations

When asked their aspirations for the future, most respondents indicated that improving their health and wellbeing (78%) and strengthening relationships with family and friends (73%) was ‘moderately important’, ‘important’ or ‘very important’ (see Table 8).

Table 8 Aspirations of Aboriginal peoples living in social housing
Full size table

Discussion

This paper presents the results of a survey conducted to understand the SEWB, needs and aspirations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in social housing in Victoria, Australia. This study is a first in addressing a gap in understanding the contribution of various domains and determinants to SEWB in this population. An important finding from the study was the identification of a set of strengths by respondents.

Strengths

The strong sense of identity, connection to family and culture expressed by most survey respondents are key elements of SEWB. These strengths reflect the resilience of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to not only survive changing environments over many thousands of years but also the ongoing impacts of colonialism, genocide, and racism. These strengths can be cultivated by addressing aspirations for enhanced family, community, and cultural connections. Opportunities for greater community and cultural engagement both for children through cultural learning experiences and more broadly through community events and safe places to meet, such as gathering places were identified in the survey. These domains can also inform strengths-based approaches to improving SEWB [15] in line with contemporary approaches in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities [29, 30].

Health Burden

Coexisting with the strengths were a set of physical and mental health challenges. The prevalence of health issues was frequently higher among respondents than in the general population of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the general Australian population. For example, a doctor’s diagnosis of asthma was higher among respondents (36%) than reported by the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population in Australia (16%) [31]. Smoking was reported by 41% of survey respondents which is similar to the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population aged over 15 in Australia [32] but higher than the 11% rate for all Australians over 18 [33]. Most households included a person with a disability (52%) which is more than the 36% of Australian households [34].

A study of South Australian general population norms indicate a mean self-rated health score of 79 on the EQ-5D-5 L instrument, approximately 9 points higher than our survey group [35]. Norms for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations and the broader Australian population are not available. The prevalence of back pain among respondents (36%) is higher than in the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population aged 2 years and older (12.6%) [31]. These differences reflect the older age of study participants, and the provision of social housing to support people experiencing ill health and disability.

The survey revealed high levels of depression (33%) and anxiety (41%) in Aboriginal peoples living in social housing compared to the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population (aged two years and over) with 13% and 17% respectively [32]. The difference again reflects both the age range of participants and their prioritisation for social housing due to complex needs. The rate of reported high or very high levels of psychological distress by survey respondents (28%) is comparable to the 31% of the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population not living in remote locations aged over 18 [31] but higher than the general Australian population aged over 16 (15%) experiencing high or very high levels as measured with the K10 [36].

This analysis indicates that at least a quarter of Aboriginal peoples living in social housing experience physical, mental, and emotional conditions at higher rates than the general Australian population and at times higher than the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. This is reflected in at least a third of respondents feeling ‘only a little’ or ‘not at all’ in control of their life, being able to solve problems and make the right choices. Disrupted connections to mind and body can lead to poorer SEWB [11] and hinder engagement in community, cultural activities and broader social, employment and training opportunities. The aspiration most frequently reported by respondents, to improve their health and wellbeing, reflects the desire to address these disrupted connections. Addressing physical and mental health barriers to engagement in their local communities and broader society is not only a need but a priority of Aboriginal peoples living in social housing.

Social determinants

Additional challenges to SEWB arise from social determinants. Year 12 or certificate III qualification completion rates (45%) among respondents were less than the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population aged 20 and over in Australia (57%) [37] reflecting both the younger age range of participants and the complex needs of those living in social housing. Similarly, the rate of paid employment among respondents (18%) was less than that of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in major cities (59%) and in inner regional areas (51%) [38]. High rates of unemployment and inability to work are reflected in more respondents (54%) running out of money for food, clothing or bills than the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population (39%) [39]. These disparities reflect barriers to employment including education level, ill health, disability, financial stress, and availability of transport.

Many respondents faced difficulties in accessing services, such as social security and health, and engaging with employment and education due to past negative experiences. The lack of respect for the culture or the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, felt by respondents, along with reports of unfair treatment are significant deterrents to engaging with the broader community and essential services. While persistent racism and inequity are not quickly or easily addressed in Australia, the need for culturally safe and appropriate pathways into health, education, employment, and other key community supports are essential in enabling Aboriginal peoples living in social housing to address their needs and realise their aspirations.

While most survey respondents held aspirations for greater engagement in education, training, and employment, less than half the respondents felt there were opportunities to develop skills in the community or further their education to improve their employment prospects. This may explain why more respondents aspire to improve their financial situation over education or employment, as education and employment may not be seen as easily negotiable pathways to improving finances. Respondents identified the need for further support in the form of subsidies to make training and education more affordable for this population and tutoring to assist school children or coaching for adults.

Strengths based approaches

Most Aboriginal peoples living in social housing were happy, interested and satisfied with life and have found ways to build identity and important connections to family and community, that can enhance SEWB, despite high rates of health issues, psychosocial and financial distress. Positive psychology has shown that distress and wellbeing can coexist [40] and resilience research has demonstrated people can grow and develop as a result of adversity [41]. Future quantitative research could explore, through regression analysis, the association between strengths and challenges and their respective contribution to wellbeing in this population. This type of research could inform a move beyond deficit based approaches to strength based approaches to promoting wellbeing. Examining various strength-based approaches in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations, including those living in social housing, will inform whether these approaches are appropriate and effective in improving SEWB. The evaluation of an AHV led coaching strengths based wellbeing intervention, informed by the findings of this survey, will be published once complete and contribute to understanding this approach [15].

Limitations

The main limitation of the study is the low survey response rate (35%) among AHV tenancy holders. This response rate is comparable to response rates in AHV’s own renter satisfaction survey which returned response rates of between, 17% and 27% in recent years [42,43,44]. Similar low response rates have been reported in research with social housing tenants internationally [45,46,47]. The low survey response rate can also be understood in the context of being conducted through repeated and lengthy COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns which added to the stressors for Aboriginal peoples living in social housing.

Survey respondents were significantly older than non-survey participants as the survey was restricted to those 16 years and above. Despite the low response rate and the age difference, the survey sample was found to be largely representative of the AHV tenancy population on several key dimensions related to tenancy stress. Therefore, the study findings are likely to be generalisable to the broader population of people living in AHV social housing. These findings are also likely to be indicative of common issues faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in other social housing settings. However, similar research examining the SEWB of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in a range of other community and public housing settings in Australia is needed to understand whether these findings are shared across the broader population.

Self- selection bias may affect the results. Those with more time, resources and experiencing fewer stressors are more likely to respond potentially presenting a more positive picture of social and emotional wellbeing than experienced by non-respondents. The greater proportion of survey respondents from single or single shared household types with fewer caring responsibilities or dependents supports this. The survey’s length and complexity may have also deterred some individuals from participating.

Conclusions

This study has begun to address a gap in understanding the SEWB, needs and aspirations of Aboriginal peoples living in social housing in Victoria, Australia. Strong connections to identity, family and culture were found to coexist along with disrupted connections to mind, body and community. The strength of these connections, along with challenges in accessing and engaging with employment, education and community resources, can influence SEWB.

The study highlights the need and aspirations for culturally safe and appropriate pathways to services and community resources for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in social housing to strengthen connections to body, mind, emotions and community. Targeted, co-designed strengths-based programs informed by research could play a role in supporting individuals and communities to enhance connections to key domains of SEWB.

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Notes

  1. Note that as no survey respondents identified as Torres Strait Islander that respondents will be referred to as Aboriginal. Where there is reference to the broader Indigenous population the term Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander is used.

Abbreviations

AHV:

Aboriginal Housing Victoria

ARRQ:

Aboriginal Resilience and Recovery Questionnaire

NDIS:

National Disability Insurance Scheme

SEWB:

Social and Emotional Wellbeing

References

  1. Prentice D, Scutella R. What are the impacts of living in social housing? New evidence from Australia. Hous Stud. 2020;35(4):612–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Muir K, Powell A, Flanagan K, Stone W, Tually S, Faulkner D, et al. A pathway to where? Inquiry into understanding and reimagining social housing pathways AHURI Final Report No. 332. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holding E, Blank L, Crowder M, Ferrari E, Goyder E. Exploring the relationship between housing concerns, mental health and wellbeing: a qualitative study of social housing tenants. Journal of public health (Oxford, England). England: Oxford University Press; 2020. pp. e231–e8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Measuring the social and emotional wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Canberra: AIHW; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cunningham J, Paradies YC. Patterns and correlates of self-reported racial discrimination among australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults, 2008-09: analysis of national survey data. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12(1).

  6. Butler TL, Anderson K, Garvey G, Cunningham J, Ratcliffe J, Tong A, et al. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s domains of wellbeing: a comprehensive literature review. Soc Sci Med. 2019;233:138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Calma T, Dudgeon P, Bray A. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing and Mental Health. Australian Psychol. 2017;52(4):255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersen MJ, Williamson AB, Fernando P, Redman S, Eades S. They took the land, now we’re fighting for a house’: Aboriginal perspectives about urban housing disadvantage. Hous Stud. 2018;33(4):635–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freund M, Sanson-Fisher R, Adamson D, Norton G, Hobden B, Clapham M. The wellbeing needs of social housing tenants in Australia: an exploratory study. BMC Public Health: BMC; 2022. p. 1–9.

  10. Garvey G, Anderson K, Gall A, Butler TL, Whop LJ, Arley B, et al. The fabric of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Wellbeing: a conceptual model. International journal of environmental research and public health. Switzerland: MDPI; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gee G, Dudgeon P, Schultz C, Hart A, Kelly K. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing. In: Dudgeon P, Milroy H, Walker R, editors. Working together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mental health and wellbeing principles and practice. Barton, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Commonwealth of Australia. National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples’ Mental Health and Social and Emotional Wellbeing 2017–2023. Canberra: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Toyama K. From needs to aspirations in information technology for development. Inform Technol Dev. 2018;24(1):15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hart CS. How do aspirations Matter? J Hum Dev Capabilities. 2016;17:324–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown A, Mensah F, Gee G, Paradies Y, French S, Waters L et al. Evaluation of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander strengths based coaching program: a study protocol. BMC Public Health: BMC; 2021. p. 1–11.

  16. Aboriginal Housing Victoria, About AHV. Melbourne2022 [Available from: https://ahvic.org.au/about.

  17. National Health and Medical Research Council. Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders. Canberra; 2018.

  18. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. Canberra: AIATSIS; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brockman R, Dudgeon P. Indigenous clinical psychology in Australia: a decolonising social–emotional well-being approach. 2020. In: Beyond the Psychology Industry: how else might we heal? [Internet]. https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=3d77eb03-cf0a-34f6-baca-b7c7fbbe4cdf; [83–93]. Available from: https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=3d77eb03-cf0a-34f6-baca-b7c7fbbe4cdf.

  20. Clark Y, Gee G, Ralph N, Atkinson C, Brown S, Glover K et al. Healing the past by nurturing the future: Cultural and emotional safety framework. J Indigenous Wellbeing: Te Mauri-Pimatisiwin. 2020;5(1).

  21. Arabena K, Ritte R, Sutherland G. First 1000 Days Australia: An Australian interpretation of the 1000 Days movement and measuring the impact on families 2016. In: Family and Relationships Australia Peer reviewed papers for the FRSA 2016 National Conference: Measuring Success in the family and relationship sector [Internet]. ACT: FRSA 2016. 1. Conference e-Journal.

  22. Lamers SMA, Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer ET, ten Klooster PM, Keyes CLM. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). J Clin Psychol. 2011;1:99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gee G, Hulbert C, Haslam N, Sheridan S, Charles L, Thompson L et al. The her Tribe and his Tribe Aboriginal-Designed empowerment programs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4).

  24. Graham G, Carol H, Helen K, Yin P. Cultural determinants and resilience and recovery factors associated with trauma among Aboriginal help-seeking clients from an Aboriginal community-controlled counselling service. BMC Psychiatry: BMC; 2023. pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McNamara BJ, Gubhaju EB, Williamson L, Joshy A, Raphael G. Measuring psychological distress in older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders Australians: a comparison of the K-10 and K‐5. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014;38(6):567–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jach HK, Sun J, Loton D, Chin T-C, Waters LE. Strengths and subjective wellbeing in adolescence: strength-based parenting and the moderating effect of Mindset. J Happiness Studies: Interdisciplinary Forum Subjective Well-Being. 2018;19(2):567.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Victorian Government. Family Violence Multi Agency Risk Assessment and Management Framework Practice Guides. Appendix 3: Screening and Identification Tool. Melbourne: State of Victoria; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bryant J, Bolt R, Botfield JR, Martin K, Doyle M, Murphy D, et al. Beyond deficit: ‘strengths-based approaches’ in indigenous health research. Sociol Health Illn. 2021;43(6):1405–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fogarty W, Lovell M, Heron JL. M-J. Deficit discourse and strengths-based Approaches www.lowitja.org.au. The Lowitja Institute & National Centre for Indigenous Studies; 2018.

  31. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey. (2018-19 financial year) 2019 [Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-peoples/national-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-health-survey/latest-release#key-statistics.

  32. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare:National Indigenous Australians Agency. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework: Tier 2 Determinants of health: 2.15 Tobacco use https://www.indigenoushpf.gov.au/measures/2-15-tobacco-use [.

  33. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Smoking https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/health-conditions-and-risks/smoking/latest-release#data-downloads2020-21 financial year [.

  34. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers 2015 2016 [Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/disability/disability-ageing-and-carers-australia-first-results/latest-release.

  35. McCaffrey N, Kaambwa B, Currow DC, Ratcliffe J. Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South australian population norms. Health and quality of life outcomes. England: BioMed Central; 2016. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/national-study-mental-health-and-wellbeing/latest-release#psychological-distressReference period 2020-21 [.

  37. Education Statistics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-peoples/education-statistics-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-peoples/latest-release.

  38. Australian Institute for Health and Welfare. Indigenous Employment 2021 [Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-welfare/indigenous-employment.

  39. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Indigenous Income and Finance 2021 [Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-welfare/indigenous-income-and-finance.

  40. Westerhof GJ, Keyes CLM. Mental illness and mental health: the two continua model across the lifespan. J Adult Dev. 2010;17(2):110–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fleming J, Ledogar RJ, Resilience. An Evolving Concept: A Review Of Literature Relevant To Aboriginal Research. Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal & Indigenous Community Health. 2008;6(2):7–23.

  42. Community Housing Industry Association NSW. Aboriginal Housing Victoria: 2021 Tenant Satisfaction Survey Report 2021.

  43. Community Housing Industry Association NSW. Aboriginal Housing Victoria Tenant Satisfaction Survey 2019. 2019.

  44. NSW Federation of Housing Associations. Aboriginal Housing Victoria: 2017 Tenant Satisfaction Survey. 2017.

  45. Srivarathan A, Kristiansen M, Lund R, Jørgensen TSH. The association between social integration and neighborhood dissatisfaction and unsafety: a cross-sectional survey study among social housing residents in Denmark. Archives of Public Health. 2022;80(1).

  46. Bennett G, McNeill L, Wolin K, Duncan D, Puleo E, Emmons K. Safe to walk? Neighborhood safety and physical activity among public housing residents. PLoS Med: Public Library of Science (PLoS); 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Scott H, Mattocks C, Blank L, Buckner S. Rehousing older social housing tenants: a mixed-methods study. The Lancet. 2021;398:79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the communities and staff of Aboriginal Housing Victoria, particularly Darren Smith, Samantha French, and the peer researchers who worked closely with community to collect survey data.

Funding

The study is funded through the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Grant number 1154619). GG holds an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (Grant number1161841). Research at the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute is supported by the Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Programme. The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Alison Brown, Tilahun Haregu, Fiona Mensah, Lea Waters, Stephanie J Brown, Kelsey Hegarty, Rebecca Ritte & Gregory Armstrong

  2. Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia

    Graham Gee, Fiona Mensah & Stephanie J Brown

  3. School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Graham Gee

  4. Latrobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia

    Jan M Nicholson

  5. The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia

    Kelsey Hegarty

  6. Aboriginal Housing Victoria, Fitzroy North, VIC, 3068, Australia

    Darren Smith & Sue D’Amico

  7. Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia

    Yin Paradies

Authors
  1. Alison Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tilahun Haregu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Graham Gee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fiona Mensah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lea Waters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stephanie J Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jan M Nicholson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kelsey Hegarty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Darren Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sue D’Amico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Rebecca Ritte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yin Paradies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Gregory Armstrong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AB contributed to the study development and drafted the initial manuscript which was based on the work of GA, YP, RR, JN, SB, KH, and LW who designed the study and compiled the grant submission. TH, FM and AB completed the data analysis. GG, DS, SD, FM have all contributed to the design of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Brown.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all survey participants. The study has received ethics approval from the University of Melbourne Human Ethics Committee STEM 1 on 9/2/21 (ethics ID 2020-13595-13162-4). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, A., Haregu, T., Gee, G. et al. Social and emotional wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Aboriginal controlled social housing. BMC Public Health 23, 1935 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16817-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16817-y

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us