Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension: a cross-sectional study from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009 to 2014

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 1862 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In previous studies, sun-protective behaviors increased cardiovascular incidence. Our present article is to further analyze the potential relationship between sun-protective behaviors (staying in the shade, wearing long-sleeved clothing, and applying sunscreen) and hypertension.

Method

The present cross-sectional study evaluated 8,613 participants (aged 20–60 years) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) obtained between 2009 and 2014. We performed multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the relationship between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension. Subgroup analysis was then performed. Multiple linear regression analysis was utilized to examine the relationship of sun-protective behaviors and each sun-protective behavior with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, stratified by sex and race.

Results

A total of 8,613 participants (weighted n = 127,909,475) were applied in our study, including 1,694 hypertensive subjects. Our study demonstrated that sun-protective behaviors of the 2–3 category were associated with increased risk of hypertension, but not with higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In subgroup analysis, men, Mexican American, and 25 < BMI ≤ 30 who reported sun-protective behaviors (2–3) were prone to hypertension. Multiple linear regression models showed that non-Hispanic white men with sun-protective behaviors (2–3) were positively associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The association between other-Hispanic men with frequent wearing long-sleeved clothing and diastolic blood pressure was positively correlated.

Conclusion

Sun-protective behaviors of the 2–3 category could increase the incidence of hypertension, but not increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure. We only found that non-Hispanic white men who reported sun-protective behaviors (2–3) were positively associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure. These findings suggested that excessive sun-protective behaviors should be avoided.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hypertension, defined as measured systolic pressure of ≥ 140 mmHg and diastolic pressure of ≥ 90 mmHg, is a major health problem that traditionally gives rise to atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [1]. It commonly coexists with other cardiovascular risk factors and may damage the structures and functions of essential organs, such as the heart, brain, and kidneys, and eventually contribute to their failure [2]. The prevalence and incidence of hypertension vary by country, region, race, and age, and are higher in industrialized countries than in developing countries [3]. Statistical data indicate that in recent three decades, the world has witnessed an increase in hypertension in adults aged 30–79 years from 650 million to 1.28 billion individuals [4]. In 2019, high blood pressure was a major or contributing cause of more than 500,000 deaths in the United States [5]. Hypertension has now become the primary risk factor for cardiac death in the United States [6].

Many studies have found that sunlight provides significant benefits [7]. Sunlight exposure can stimulate vitamin D3 synthesis in the skin [8], which can promote growth and development in children, as well as decrease the risk of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fractures in adults [9]. It is well documented that people with the greatest sun exposure have a lower cardiovascular mortality risk in comparison to those with inadequate sun exposure [10] and that increased sun exposure in the summer reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction [11]. And as the world population continues to grow, the proportion of indoor workplaces and living increases every year and many people emphasize sun protection [12]. However, many articles only studied the relationship between sunlight and hypertension. Rostand et al. found that people residing in low latitudes had a lower incidence of hypertension because they were exposed to higher rates of solar radiation [13] and Ke et al.confirmed that more sun exposure reduced the risk of hypertension in population from a Macau [14]. Fewer studies have used the direction of sun protection to explore the relationship with hypertension.

Therefore, the present study investigated a potential connection between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension by analyzing adult (aged 20–60 years) patient data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2009–2014.

Methods

Data source and study population

Statistical data from the NHANES were analyzed to investigate the relationship between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension. The NHANES is major research study that was carried out by the National Center for Health Statistics, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to assess the state of health and nutrition in the U.S. population. The present study received approval from The National Center for Health Statistics and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. More information is available in the NHANES database, http://www.cdc.gov/Nhanes. A total of 8,613 individuals were included in the study after excluding patients with missing information on sun-protective behaviors, hypertension, and other covariates. The flow chart of the systematic selection process is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the systematic selection process

Full size image

Outcome variable

Blood pressure measurements were obtained by professionally trained personnel. Participants with hypertension were informed by their physicians that they conformed to the hypertension criteria. The criteria are systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg in three blood pressure measurements taken at the same time on a non-same day.

Sun-protective behaviors

Sun-protective behavior was assessed using three variables that included staying in the shade, wearing long-sleeved clothing, and applying sunscreen. These variables were recorded as “always”, “most of the time”, “sometimes”, “rarely”, and “never” in the NHANES. The present analysis categorized the three variables as “rare” (never or rarely), “moderate” (sometimes), or “frequent” (always or most of time). Sun-protective behaviors were then classified as 0, 1, and 2–3 based on the number of behaviors with frequent use in three variables [15].

Covariates

Covariates, including age (20–60 years), sex (men/women), race (non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white, Mexican American, other Hispanic and other race), marital status (single/never married, separated/divorced, widowed, married, and others), family poverty income ratio (PIR), body mass index (BMI), educational level (less than high school education/primary education, high school education/secondary education, and college education or above), smoking status, alcohol consumption, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] level (severely deficient: < 25 nmol/mL, deficient: 25–49.9 nmol/mL, insufficient: 50–74.9 nmol/mL, and normal values: ≥ 75 nmol/mL) [16, 17], milk consumption, skin reaction, cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and weak/failing kidney. BMI is the body fat index for the weight (kg) to height (m2) ratio. PIR has been used in several studies as a marker of economic status [18]. Smoking status was categorized as current smoking (smoking every day or having more than 100 cigarettes over the course of their life), former smoking (currently non-smoking and having more than 100 cigarettes in the past), and never smoking (having fewer than 100 cigarettes) [19]. Drinking at least 12 alcoholic beverages of any type in the past year was defined as alcohol consumption [20]. Milk consumption was classified as a regular drinker (> 5 times per week), sometimes drinker (< 5 times per week), or never drinker (never drinking milk). Skin reaction to sun exposure without any protection after no sun exposure for several months was classified as nothing, mild, or severe. Participants with hypercholesterolemia were defined as individuals with high blood cholesterol levels. Participants with diabetes mellitus were diagnosed by a medical professional with hyperglycemia. Participants had a weak failing kidney if a physician diagnosed them with abnormal renal function. Participants with CVD were diagnosed by a physician with angina pectoris, heart attack, congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, or stroke [21].

Statistical analysis

R (http://www.R-project.org) was used to analyze the dataset. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages (%) and compared using χ2. Continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using dependent-sample t-tests (normal distribution) or Kruskal–Wallis rank sum tests (non-normal distribution).

With sun-protective behaviors (0) as the reference category, multiple logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate the relationship between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex, race, and BMI. Three models were used in the present analysis: Model 1 (an unadjusted model), Model 2 (adjusted for age, sex, and race), and Model 3 (adjusted for model 2 and educational level, marital status, PIR, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, milk consumption, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, skin reaction, CVD, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and weak/failing kidney). When stratified by a certain variable, the model does not adjust this variable. We used multiple linear regression models to analyze the relationship of sun-protective behaviors and each sun-protective behavior with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, stratified by sex and race. Statistical significance was recognized by the value of P < 0.05.

Results

Description of the study population

The study analysis included data for 8,613 eligible participants (weighted n = 127,909,475), including 4,199 men and 4,414 women. The number of sun-protective behaviors with hypertensive participants was 1,964. The overall means (± SD) of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 118.53 ± 14.36 and 71.60 ± 11.07. The mean age of study population was 39.01 ± 11.58 years. The percentages of sun-protective behaviors with 0, 1, and 2–3 were 47.7%, 36.8%, and 15.5%. The mean (± SD) of BMI was 28.97 ± 6.87 kg/m2. Race included Mexican American (n = 1,267, 9.3%), other Hispanic (n = 802, 6.1%), non-Hispanic white (n = 3,653, 65.1%), non-Hispanic black (n = 1,760, 11.5%), other race (n = 1,131, 8.0%). The demographic data characteristics organized by sun-protective behaviors status are represented in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of participants stratified by sun-protective behaviors (NHANES 2009–2014)
Full size table

Association between Sun-protective behaviors and hypertension among different subgroups

Odds ratio (OR) was used as a measure of risk. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension (Table 2). Participants with sun-protective behaviors in the 2–3 category were prone to hypertension (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.00–1.67, P = 0.0496) compared to those without sun-protective behaviors in Model 3. In the subgroup analysis of the fully-adjusted model (Table 2), we found that men, Mexican American, and BMI in the intermediate range who reported sun-protective behaviors (2–3) were prone to hypertension (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.07–2.29, P = 0.0213; OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.09–4.74, P = 0.0294; OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.15–2.76, P = 0.0098).

Table 2 Association between Sun-protective behaviors and hypertension
Full size table

Association between sun-protective behaviors with SBP and DBP

We also assessed the association of sun-protective behaviors with systolic and diastolic blood pressure using multiple linear regression analysis (Table 3). We found that sun-protective behaviors had no significant difference with systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The non-Hispanic white men who reported sun-protective behaviors (2–3) had positive association with systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the fully-adjusted model (95% CI = 1.30–7.40, P = 0.0052; 95% CI = 0.08–5.08, P = 0.0433).

Table 3 Association between sun-protective behaviors with SBP and DBP
Full size table

Association between each sun-protective behavior with SBP and DBP

Additional multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the association of each sun-protective behavior with systolic and diastolic blood pressure (see Additional file 1). In the fully-adjusted model, we found that the association between other-Hispanic men with frequent wearing long-sleeved clothing and diastolic blood pressure was positively correlated (95% CI = -0.69–10.34, P = 0.0253).

Discussion

In previous studies, opländer study confirmed that ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation was associated with lower blood pressure [22]. Feelisch and coworkers indicated that the drop in blood pressure was due to arterial vasodilatation caused by ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation and found that the skin can mobilize nitric oxide through photolysis of cutaneous nitrite or nitrate to lower blood pressure with UVA radiation [23]. Ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation is derived from sunlight and sun-protective behaviors cause a reduction in UVA absorption [24], which made us explore the relationship between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension. Finally, we conducted this study and found a positive association between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension.

Sun-protective behaviors are different for sexes. Pinault et al. found that sun-protective behaviors in females are more significant in the summer months for Canadian adults [25]. And different races have different awareness of sun protection because of factors such as culture, geographical location, and so on [26]. For people with different BMI, the larger the body surface area will receive more sunlight [27]. Therefore, we performed subgroup analyses using these three variables. The results showed that sun-protective behaviors were associated with an increased risk of hypertension, which was more significant in sex and race. The analysis of people with different BMI suggests that those in the intermediate range are at greater risk of developing hypertension. In high BMI, more sunlight absorption can lower blood pressure, but high BMI increases the risk of insulin resistance [28], which could increase the risk of developing hypertension [29]. There is currently no relevant literature discussing this.

To acknowledge the relationship of sun-protective behaviors with systolic and diastolic blood pressure stratified by sex and race, we performed a multiple linear regression and found no significant differences. Because systolic and diastolic blood pressure data were collected after antihypertensive medication or life interventions, which may have contributed to the fact that sun-protective behaviors were not associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure. And it was difficult to obtain pre-intervention systolic and diastolic blood pressure due to the limited database. However, even with post-intervention data, we found significant differences between non-Hispanic white men who reported sun-protective behaviors (2–3) with diastolic and systolic blood pressure, suggesting that sun protection programs should be more important for this population.

In our study, analysis of each sun-protective behavior and hypertension combination is shown in Additional file 1. After adjusting for confounders, the outcomes showed that the association between other race men who reported wearing long-sleeved clothing frequently and diastolic blood pressure was positively correlated. Staying in the shade and applying sunscreen were not associated with increased risk of hypertension. There are no relevant studies examining the relationship between each sun-protective behavior and hypertension, and more study is needed to verify the results.

Hypertension causes a great number of CVD morbidity and mortality cases [30]. Decreasing blood pressure levels has a significant influence on reducing the societal disease burden [31]. The present study adjusted for several potential confounders in the NHANES to analyze the association between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension, confirming that individuals with sun-protective behaviors are more likely to have hypertension. In the future, patients will be able to improve their blood pressure by following appropriate sun-protective behavior recommendations provided by their medical practitioners.

There were several limitations in the present study. Firstly, the cross-sectional nature of the study introduced intrinsic limitations. The data from the NHANES were obtained between 2009 and 2014. In the future, a randomized controlled study will be necessary to verify these results. Secondly, the history of hypertension and sun-protective behaviors were self-reported, resulting in under- or over-reported questionnaire outcomes. Thirdly, due to the limited database, the systolic and diastolic blood pressure data were obtained post-intervention. This may lead to differences in results. Finally, the participants were 20–60-years-old. Given that hypertension often occurs in the elderly, future research will need to focus on patients older than 60 years.

Conclusion

The present cross-sectional study results demonstrated that sun-protective behaviors of the 2–3 category were associated with increased risk of hypertension, but not with higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure. We only found that non-Hispanic white men who reported sun-protective behaviors (2–3) were positively associated with systolic and diastolic pressure. Consequently, patients should be encouraged to avoid excessive sun protection due to the high risk of hypertension and sun-protective behaviors should be sensible for non-Hispanic white men. Future clinical studies could focus on developing specific sun protection programs for different populations.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the NHANES repository, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.

Abbreviations

NHANES:

National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey

CVDs:

Cardiovascular diseases

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

PIR:

Family poverty income ratio

BMI:

Body mass index

25(OH)D:

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D

UVA:

Ultraviolet A

SBP:

systolic blood pressure

DBP:

diastolic blood pressure

References

  1. Smith CE, Metz M, Lookens Pierre J, Rouzier V, Yan LD, Sufra R, et al. Comparison of community and clinic-based blood pressure measurements: A cross-sectional study from Haiti. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2(9):e0001064.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen JC Jr, Halaand B, Shirore RM, Jafar TH. Statistical analysis plan for management of hypertension and multiple risk factors to enhance cardiovascular health in Singapore: the SingHypertension pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh KB, Woo D, Sekar P, Osborne J, Moomaw CJ, Langefeld CD, et al. Untreated Hypertension: A Powerful Risk Factor for Lobar and Nonlobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics. Circulation. 2016;134(19):1444–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398(10304):957–80.

  5. Vaughan AS, Coronado F, Casper M, Loustalot F, Wright JS. County-Level Trends in Hypertension-Related Cardiovascular Disease Mortality-United States, 2000 to 2019. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(7):e024785.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou B, Perel P, Mensah GA, Ezzati M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(11):785–802.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Weller RB. Sunlight Has Cardiovascular Benefits Independently of Vitamin D. Blood Purif. 2016;41(1–3):130–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holick MF. Vitamin D: A millenium perspective. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88(2):296–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee HJ, Kim CO, Lee DC. Association between Daily Sunlight Exposure and Fractures in Older Korean Adults with Osteoporosis: A Nationwide Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Yonsei Med J. 2021;62(7):593–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindqvist PG, Epstein E, Nielsen K, Landin-Olsson M, Ingvar C, Olsson H. Avoidance of sun exposure as a risk factor for major causes of death: a competing risk analysis of the Melanoma in Southern Sweden cohort. J Intern Med. 2016;280(4):375–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cannistraci CV, Nieminen T, Nishi M, Khachigian LM, Viikilä J, Laine M, et al. “Summer Shift”: A Potential Effect of Sunshine on the Time Onset of ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(8):e006878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Alfredsson L, Armstrong BK, Butterfield DA, Chowdhury R, de Gruijl FR, Feelisch M, et al. Insufficient Sun Exposure Has Become a Real Public Health Problem. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):5014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rostand SG. Ultraviolet light may contribute to geographic and racial blood pressure differences. Hypertension. 1997;30(2 Pt 1):150–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ke L, Ho J, Mpofu E, Dibley MJ, Feng X, et al. Modifiable risk factors including sunlight exposure and fish consumption are associated with risk of hypertension in a large representative population from Macau. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;144 Pt A:152–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Afarideh M, Sartori-Valinotti JC, Tollefson MM. Association of Sun-Protective Behaviors With Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporotic Bone Fractures in US Adults. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(12):1437–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):266–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen CJ. Clinical practice. Vitamin D insufficiency. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):248–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bakhru A, Erlinger TP. Smoking cessation and cardiovascular disease risk factors: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS Med. 2005;2(6):e160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Slade GD, Thornton-Evans GO, Borgnakke WS, et al. Update on Prevalence of Periodontitis in Adults in the United States: NHANES 2009 to 2012. J Periodontol. 2015;86(5):611–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin MP, Ovbiagele B, Markovic D, Towfighi A. “Life’s Simple 7” and Long-Term Mortality After Stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(11):e001470.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Q, Dai Z, Cao Y, Wang L. Association of C-reactive protein and vitamin D deficiency with cardiovascular disease: A nationwide cross-sectional study from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007 to 2008. Clin Cardiol. 2019;42(7):663–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Opländer C, Volkmar CM, Paunel-Görgülü A, van Faassen EE, Heiss C, Kelm M, et al. Whole body UVA irradiation lowers systemic blood pressure by release of nitric oxide from intracutaneous photolabile nitric oxide derivates. Circ Res. 2009;105(10):1031–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu D, Fernandez BO, Hamilton A, Lang NN, Gallagher JMC, Newby DE, et al. UVA irradiation of human skin vasodilates arterial vasculature and lowers blood pressure independently of nitric oxide synthase. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(7):1839–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guan LL, Lim HW, Mohammad TF. Sunscreens and Photoaging: A Review of Current Literature. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22(6):819–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pinault L, Fioletov V. Sun exposure, sun protection and sunburn among Canadian adults. Health Rep. 2017;28(5):12–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin A, Thatiparthi A, Liu J, Ge S, Wu JJ. The influence of race/ethnicity and skin reaction to sun on sunscreen use. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(1):239–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmalwieser AW, Schmalwieser SS. Exposed Body Surface Area-A Determinate for UV Radiant Energy in Human UV Exposure Studies. Photochem Photobiol. 2023;99(4):1057–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim GR, Choi DW, Nam CM, Jang SI, Park EC. Synergistic association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and body mass index with insulin resistance in non-diabetic adults. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18417.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Castro L, Brant L, Diniz MF, Lotufo P, Bensenor IJ, Chor D, et al. Association of hypertension and insulin resistance in individuals free of diabetes in the ELSA-Brasil cohort. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Fuchs FD, Whelton PK. High Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease. Hypertension. 2020;75(2):285–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oparil S, Acelajado MC, Bakris GL, Berlowitz DR, Cífková R, Dominiczak AF, et al. Hypertension. Nature reviews Disease primers. 2018;4:18014.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the NHANES authors for providing the dataset for analysis in this study. We also thank International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com) for editing this manuscript. The Clinical Research Institute was consulted on some of the statistical issues involved in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission Project Fund (Grant number: M2020015), Jiangsu Provincial Science and Technology Department Social Development Fund (Grant number: BE2019639), Jiangsu Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Development Plan Project (Grant number: YB201988) and Xuzhou innovative plan to promote science technology (Grant number: KC21192).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Shuping Yang and Feng Dai contributed equally to this study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Practice, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000, People’s Republic of China

    Shuping Yang & Lei Li

  2. Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000, People’s Republic of China

    Shuping Yang, Feng Dai, Zhaokai Wang, Ruoshui Li, Cheng Li, Chaofan Wang, Dongye Li & Tongda Xu

  3. Department of Stomatology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000, People’s Republic of China

    Xianzhi Xu

  4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000, People’s Republic of China

    Xiancun Hou

  5. Institute of Cardiovascular Disease Research, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000, People’s Republic of China

    Yang Liu

Authors
  1. Shuping Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feng Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhaokai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruoshui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xianzhi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cheng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiancun Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chaofan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dongye Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tongda Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SPY and FD participated in the initial plan, design of the study, data interpretation, and manuscript drafting. ZKW and RSL performed the statistical analysis and participated in data interpretation and manuscript revision. XZX, CL, XCH, YL, and CFW participated in data interpretation and manuscript drafting. DYL, LL, and TDX critically reviewed, edited, and approved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lei Li or Tongda Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study received approval from The National Center for Health Statistics and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Association between each sun-protective behavior with SBP and DBP.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, S., Dai, F., Wang, Z. et al. Association between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension: a cross-sectional study from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009 to 2014. BMC Public Health 23, 1862 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16439-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16439-4

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us