Skip to main content

Association of demographics, cardiovascular indicators and disability characteristics with 7-year coronary heart disease incident in persons with disabilities

Abstract

Objective

Previous studies had demonstrated that disability increases mortality in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, for people who had been disabled but do not have baseline cardiovascular disease, there is still limited data on how they might develop CHD. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and predictors of CHD in people with disabilities.

Methods

We conducted a 7-year retrospective study utilizing data from the Shanghai Comprehensive Information Platform for Persons with Disabilities Rehabilitation. Subjects aged over 18 years with at least four annual complete electronic health records were included. The primary outcome was CHD, defined as ischemic heart disease or myocardial infarction. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare cumulative CHD for sub-populations, stratified by age, gender, and the classification of disabilities. Cox regression was used to identify the potentially important factors.

Results

Out of 6419 persons with disabilities, 688 CHD cases (mean age 52.95 ± 7.17 years, male 52.2%) were identified, with a cumulative incidence of 10.72% and an incidence density of 15.15/1000 person-years. The incidence density of CHD is higher in the male gender, people over 45 years, and those with physical disabilities. Male (HR = 1.294, 95% CI, 1.111–1.506), hypertension (HR = 1.683, 95% CI, 1.405–2.009), diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.488, 95% CI, 1.140–1.934), total cholesterol (HR = 1.110, 95% CI, 1.023–1.204), and physical disabilities (HR = 1.122, 95% CI, 1.019–1.414) were independently associated with CHD.

Conclusion

The findings indicate that the incidence of CHD differs across disability categories rather than the severity of disability. People with physical disabilities had significantly higher risks for the development of CHD. The underlying physiological and pathological factors need to be further studied.

Peer Review reports

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN?

  • CHD is one of the important causes of poor health condition, disability, and death. Disability caused by CHD is likely to be more lethal than disability resulting from other causes

  • The associations between disease and disability are bidirectional. However, most of the existing studies provided information on the risks and prognostics of CHD, that treated disability as one of the outcomes.

WHAT ARE THE NEW FINDINGS?

  • In this 7-years cohort, we provide epidemiologic data of CHD secondary to disability status, including its incidence rate (15.15/1000 person-years) and risk factors. All subjects included in this study had been disabled and with no baseline CHD history, which was different from the study population in previous studies.

  • The incidence rate of CHD differs across disability categories, rather than the severity of disability. Physical disabilities increase the risks of CHD, compared with other disability types. Cardio-metabolic risk factors remain a strong risk predictor of CHD among disabled population.

WHAT DO THE NEW FINDINGS IMPLY?

  • Our findings suggest that physical disability is associated with a higher risk of CHD than other types of disability, which is independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as age, male gender, and history hypertension. More detailed health monitoring and assessment strategies for the prevention of cardiovascular disease are needed for people with physical disabilities.

Introduction

Disability refers to a persistent condition of having a body that functions abnormally, limits activities, or restricts participation [1]. It is estimated that over one billion individuals worldwide live with some form of disability [2]. This group of people is especially prone to health problems due to deficiencies in healthcare services and unequal access to medical care [3, 4]. Their diverse and heterogeneous nature further compounds the problem, leading to unmet health needs [5, 6]. Research shows that individuals with serious chronic illnesses have higher rates of disability. However, there is limited understanding of the emergence of chronic diseases in individuals who are already living with a disability.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of disability and death worldwide, and its incidence is expected to rise due to the aging population [7, 8]. Several CHD risk prediction models have been developed based on longitudinal data from the general population [9,10,11,12]. Studies have demonstrated that the relationship between CHD and disability is bidirectional [13]. CHD patients with disabilities face higher mortality risks, and disability caused by CHD tends to be more lethal than disability caused by other factors. Despite these findings, most existing studies only focus on the risks and prognostics of CHD, and treat disability as a secondary outcome.

According to the Chinese national standard for Classification and Grading Criteria of Disability (GB/T 26341–2010) [14], there are four main types of disability: physical, visual, hearing & speech, and mental & intellectual. Each of these can be further categorized based on the degree of severity. Available studies have shown that people with disabilities are more likely to experience social isolation [15], have less healthy lifestyles [16], face barriers to accessing preventive healthcare [17, 18], and have higher all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality rates [19,20,21]. Despite these findings, there has been limited research focused on investigating CHD incidence and risks in this population.

Our previous research [22] has revealed that people with disabilities, particularly those with physical disabilities, have a higher prevalence of hypertension. Based on this, we hypothesize that there may be differences in the incidence of CHD among individuals with disabilities. This study aims to retrospectively examine the incidence and potential predictors of CHD in disabled individuals using large-scale sample data. The results of this study will increase awareness of CHD in people with disabilities and assist healthcare practitioners in identifying CHD risks during health screenings for this population.

Methods

Data collection and ethics statement

This was a retrospective observational cohort study. The study data were obtained from the Shanghai Disabled Persons’ Rehabilitation Comprehensive Information Platform (SDPRCIP), which was established by the Shanghai Disabled Persons’ Federation (SDPF). SDPF has been providing a free health examination service for local persons with disabilities every year. Since 2012, the service has been designated to be implemented by Shanghai YangZhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), and the relevant health examination records were uploaded by the hospital to the SDPRCIP for health follow-up. Examinees who voluntarily participated in this service have informed to the possible use of relevant health data for scientific research.

Study population

People with disabilities who met the following criteria were included in this study: (i) age over 18 years old; (ii) attended at least 4 health examinations during the 7 follow-up years from 2012–2019 with complete electronic health records at each examination; (iii) attended the 2019 annual health examination. Those who did not fulfill the longitudinal follow-up or withdrawn for any reason, or those with one of the following conditions at baseline were excluded from the study: (i) confirmed CHD: the diagnosis was confirmed by a specialist physician with reference to WHO criteria; (ii) with other critical illnesses such as malignancy, organ failure, severe trauma; (iii) pregnant or lactating women, or those who are planning to become pregnant; (iv) elderly people aged 65 and above. Our final study sample consisted of 6419 persons with disabilities (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Consort flow diagram for participants included in the study. Note: CHD, coronary heart disease

Assessment of new-onset CHD

The endpoint of this study was marked by the diagnosis of new-onset CHD during the follow-up period from January 2012 to June 2019. CHD is a heart condition caused by atherosclerosis leading to narrowing or blockage of the coronary arteries. This condition results in myocardial ischemia, hypoxia, or necrosis, so it is also referred to ischemic heart disease [23]. In the International Classification of Disease 10th revision code (ICD-10), the corresponding category codes are I20-I25 [24]. Therefore, in this study, the endpoint was defined as having a primary or any listed diagnosis of ICD-10 I20-I25 during the follow-up period.

Study variables

In the collection of baseline characteristics, demographic variables include gender, age, occupation, educational background, etc.; medical history includes hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, peripheral atherosclerosis, chronic kidney disease, etc.; disability history includes cause of disabilities, classification of disabilities, grade of disabilities, etc.; physical examination indicators include physical examination (height, weight, blood pressure, heart rate, eye examination, etc.), biochemical indicators (blood, urine indicators, etc.), electrocardiogram, imaging ultrasound, etc.

According to the Chinese national standard for Classification and Grading Criteria of Disabilities (GB/T 26341–2010) [14], the classification of disabilities included physical disabilities, visual disabilities, hearing & speech disabilities, or intellectual & mental disabilities. The grading criteria of disabilities was rated on a scale from level 1 to level 4, corresponding to very severe, severe, moderate, and mild disability, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analyses were compared between the CHD group and non-CHD group using the Pearson χ2 test for categorical variables, independent sample t-test for normally distributed data, and Mann–Whitney U test for non-parametric continuous data.

We used the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the overall cumulative incidence of CHD from the baseline study visit onwards. The log-rank test was performed to compare a cumulative incidence curve for sub-populations, stratified by age, gender, and whether physical disabilities. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression models were developed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) attributable to potentially risk factors. Significant variables in baseline comparisons were entered into the multivariate model as covariates, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), etc. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also performed to further investigate the diagnostic capability of relevant independent risk factors in predicting the new-onset CHD in individuals with disabilities.

Applicable tests were two-sided, and P-value less than 0.05 was indicated statistically significant. All statistical tests were performed by using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) and RStudio version 2022.02.3 Build 492 (http://www.rstudio.com) installed with survminer and survival packages. Data analysis was done in May 2022.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), School of Medicine, Tongji University (Approval No. YZ 2019–051). In view of the retrospective nature of the study, the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), School of Medicine, Tongji University waived the requirement for informed consent.

Results

Baseline characteristics of all participants with disabilities

Table 1 presents that a total of 6419 eligible individuals were included in the retrospective cohort. Age ranged from 18 to 64 years, with a mean age of 50.77 ± 9.88 years; 3046 (47.5%) were male and 3373 (52.5%) were female. Compared to those with non-CHD, patients with new-onset CHD were more likely to be older (mean age, 52.95 vs 50.51 years) and fatter (mean BMI, 24.33 vs 23.97), be male gender (52.2% vs 46.9%), had a higher prevalence of physical disabilities (61.2% vs 55.4%), hypertension (53.6% vs 34.9%), diabetes mellitus (19.2% vs 10.3%), and abnormal ECG (18.9% vs 10.9%). Grading of disabilities was not statistically significant in the comparison between groups. A number of metabolic biomarkers also differed significantly when compared between the two groups, including fasting blood glucose (FBG), total cholesterol (TC), total triglyceride (TG), serum urea (SU), and white blood count (WBC) (All P < 0.01).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of all participants with disabilities prior to the CHD onset

Longitudinal association between baseline variables and incident CHD at follow-up

During a median follow-up period of 84.9 months, a total of 688 cases with incident CHD were identified, with a cumulative incidence of 10.72% and an incidence density of 15.15/1000 person-years. As displayed in Table 2, the incidence population consisted of 359 males with an incidence density of 16.73/1000 person-years and 329 females with an incidence density of 13.73/1000 person-years. Moreover, the incidence density of CHD is higher in people with physical disabilities (16.59 vs. 13.32 per 1000 person-years) and those over 45 years (17.60 vs. 6.35 per 1000 person-years). The Kaplan–Meier curves for an overall cumulative incidence of CHD and the number at risk are shown in Fig. 2, stratified by (A) age, (B) gender, (C) the classification of disabilities, and (D) whether physical disabilities. Analysis showed significant differences in the cumulative incidence curves for all subgroups (Log-rank, P ≤ 0.0095).

Table 2 Incidence of CHD in the disabled population according to baseline
Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves for an overall cumulative incidence of CHD and number at risk, stratified by (A) age, (B) gender, (C) the classification of disabilities, and (D) whether physical disabilities. The shaded area indicates the range of 95% confidence intervals for the corresponding cumulative incidence curve. P-value indicates the significance level from the comparison of incidence curves using the Log-rank test

Predictors of new-onset CHD in people with disabilities

Cox proportional-hazards regression model (Table 3) was further conducted to examine the risk factors and interaction terms associated with new-onset CHD. The age-adjusted Cox analysis revealed that male gender (P = 0.005), BMI (P = 0.02), FBG (P < 0.001), TC (P < 0.001), hypertension (P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), and physical disabilities (P = 0.002) significantly associated with CHD risks. Furthermore, the multivariate Cox model demonstrated that independent predictive factors for CHD in the disabled population include male gender (HR = 1.294, 95% CI, 1.111–1.506), hypertension (HR = 1.683, 95% CI, 1.405–2.009), diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.488, 95% CI, 1.140–1.934), TC (HR = 1.110, 95% CI, 1.023–1.204), and being physical disabilities (HR = 1.122, 95% CI, 1.019–1.414). We also established the ROC curve using the independent risk factors from the multivariate Cox regression. It was shown that the risk score had better predictive power (AUC = 0.735) (Fig. 3).

Table 3 Cox regression model for the risk of CHD in the disabled population
Fig. 3
figure 3

ROC curve of the independent risk factors in predicting the new-onset CHD in individuals with disabilities. The area under the curve (AUC) value ranges from 0.5 to 1.0, with near 1.0 indicating perfect predictive ability. The horizontal axis shows false positive rate, and vertical axis shows true positive rate

Discussion

From what we know, there are limited substantial longitudinal population-based surveys to explore the association evidence between disability and CHD, particularly in Asian countries. The SDPRCIP is a government initiative focused on the Shanghai Disability Health Survey. The platform is dedicated to collecting authentic and reliable data, offering a rare chance to perform a retrospective cohort. In this study, we provide epidemiologic data of CHD secondary to disability status, including its incidence rate and risk factors. Notably, the incidence rate of CHD differs across disability categories, rather than the severity of disability. Compared with other disability types, subjects with physical disabilities may had significantly higher risk for the development of CHD.

The incidence rate of CHD in this study was 15.15/1000 person-years for people with disabilities, while it was 16.59/1000 person-years for those with physical disabilities. This result far exceeds the 5.57–6.37/1000 person-years from cohort studies in the general Chinese population [25, 26]. Consistent with the previous studies, our results demonstrated that people with disabilities have a higher risk of CHD than their healthy peers. Plichart et al. [20] revealed that subjects with moderate or severe disabilities have almost double the risk of CHD over 6 years, independent of major cardiovascular risk factors and other potential confounders. There are significant differences in the risk profiles stratified by disability types, subjects with visual disabilities and physical disabilities were more likely to incident CHD over time than those with hearing & speech disabilities, and intellectual & mental disabilities. However, the possible outcome bias caused by aging-induced degenerative visual disabilities and youth-led intellectual & mental disabilities should not be ignored.

By multivariable-adjusted Cox models, people with physical disabilities showed significantly higher incidence risk of CHD than other disability types. One of the possible explanations might be the mobility restrictions. It is established that physical inactivity, also known as sedentary lifestyle, is one of the major risk factors of CHD [27]. In addition to activity limitations and self-care deficits, people with physical disabilities are vulnerable to psychological stress and discrimination and benefit less from rehabilitation and health care services [3, 5, 15].

Existing evidence, while limited, supports that individuals with long term physical disability have been shown to be at higher risk of vascular comorbidities such as stroke compared to the general population [28, 29]. Growing experimental evidence suggested that endothelial cell dysfunction could be induced by the constantly exposure to low tensile and fluid shear stress [30,31,32]. Such hemodynamic conditions are more common in people with leg amputation. In addition to the psychological stress and patients’ deviant behaviors, we assumed that physical related hemodynamic abnormalities might be the underline risks of cardiovascular diseases.

Based on the results, BMI, FBG, TC, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus significantly increase the risk of CHD in people with disabilities. It is affirmable that important risk predictors for cardiovascular disease in people with disabilities are also accompanied by metabolic symptoms based on insulin resistance [33, 34]. It leads to CHD as a result of the interaction between abnormal lipid metabolism, hypertension, and hyperglycemia, which are mutually reinforcing. For people with disabilities, it is apparent that improving modifiable clinical risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, etc.) can similarly reduce new-onset CHD.

Strengths and limitations

The present study includes population-based data with representative sample size, thereby allowing for an accurate evaluation of the association between disability and CHD after a long period of follow-up, and the results are largely convincing. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the incidence density of CHD in China's disabled population has been documented.

However, several limitations should be considered. We recognize that individuals with severe disabilities may face mobility restrictions that prevent them from participating in health survey and other aspects of the study. As a result, the inclusion of these individuals may be constrained, leading to potential selection bias in the findings. Additionally, due to the limitations of the raw data, we were unable to assess important lifestyle factors such as drinking, smoking, and diet, as well as psychological perceptions among patients with disabilities. Moreover, although abdominal circumference and waist-to-hip ratio are known to be better predictors of long-term cardiovascular events than BMI, these measures were not included in the analysis. Therefore, further basic research and prospective cohort studies are needed to gain a better understanding of the underlying relationship between disability and cardiovascular disease.

Conclusions

Our population-based, retrospective cohort study with a 7-year follow-up demonstrated that CHD is more prevalent in people with disabilities who are male and older than 45 years. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, and physical disabilities can be independent predictors of CHD in the disabled population. Specifically, the incidence of CHD is significantly higher in people with physical disabilities than in people with other classifications of disabilities. Consequently, there is a need for cardiovascular health screening among people with physical disabilities for early detection and intervention to reduce the occurrence and progression of an adverse cardiovascular event.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated in this study are not publicly accessible due to privacy and confidentiality reasons but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Alb :

Albumin

AUC :

The area under the curve

BMI :

Body mass index

CHD :

Coronary heart disease

CIs :

Confidence intervals

ECG :

Electrocardiogram

FBG :

Fasting blood glucose

Glo :

Globulin

Hb :

Hemoglobin

HRs :

Hazard ratios

PLT :

Platelet count

RBC :

Red blood count

ROC :

The receiver operating characteristic

SCr :

Serum creatinine

SDPF :

Shanghai Disabled Persons’ Federation

SDPRCIP :

Shanghai Disabled Persons’ Rehabilitation Comprehensive Information Platform

SU :

Serum urea

TC :

Total cholesterol

TG :

Total triglyceride

UA :

Uric acid

WBC :

White blood count

References

  1. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lancet T. World Report on Disability. Lancet. 2011;377:1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Horner-Johnson W, Dobbertin K, Lee JC, Andresen EM, Expert Panel on Disability and Health Disparities. Disparities in chronic conditions and health status by type of disability. Disabil Health J. 2013;6:280–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rowland M, Peterson-Besse J, Dobbertin K, Walsh ES, Horner-Johnson W, Expert Panel on Disability and Health Disparities. Health outcome disparities among subgroups of people with disabilities: a scoping review. Disabil Health J. 2014;7:136–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahmoudi E, Meade MA. Disparities in access to health care among adults with physical disabilities: analysis of a representative national sample for a ten-year period. Disabil Health J. 2015;8:182–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Okoro CA, Hollis ND, Cyrus AC, Griffin-Blake S. Prevalence of Disabilities and Health Care Access by Disability Status and Type Among Adults - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:882–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao D, Liu J, Wang M, Zhang X, Zhou M. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in China: current features and implications. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16:203–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu S, Li Y, Zeng X, Wang H, Yin P, Wang L, et al. Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases in China, 1990–2016: Findings From the 2016 Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishimura K, Okamura T, Watanabe M, Nakai M, Takegami M, Higashiyama A, et al. Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Using Risk Factor Categories for a Japanese Urban Population, and Comparison with the Framingham Risk Score: The Suita Study. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016;23:1138–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arabasadi Z, Alizadehsani R, Roshanzamir M, Moosaei H, Yarifard AA. Computer aided decision making for heart disease detection using hybrid neural network-Genetic algorithm. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017;141:19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Narain R, Saxena S, Goyal AK. Cardiovascular risk prediction: a comparative study of Framingham and quantum neural network based approach. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1259–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen X, Zhang Z, Ye Q, Zhao J, Sun X. Standardization administration of the P.R.C. Classification and grading criteria of disability. Beijing: General administration of quality supervision, inspection and quarantine of the P.R.C; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Emerson E, Fortune N, Llewellyn G, Stancliffe R. Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study. Disabil Health J. 2021;14:100965.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou Q, Glasgow NJ, Du W. Health-related lifestyles and obesity among adults with and without disability in Australia: Implication for mental health care. Disabil Health J. 2019;12:106–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen N, Li X, Deng M, Wang CQ, Zhou C. Gender difference in unmet need for assistance with activities of daily living among disabled seniors in China : a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e044807.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Annaswamy TM, Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Frieden L. Telemedicine barriers and challenges for persons with disabilities: COVID-19 and beyond. Disabil Health J. 2020;13:100973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Son KY, Kim SH, Sunwoo S, Lee J-Y, Lim S, Kim YS. Association between disability and cardiovascular event and mortality: A nationwide representative longitudinal study in Korea. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0236665.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Plichart M, Barberger-Gateau P, Tzourio C, Amouyel P, Pérès K, Ritchie K, et al. Disability and Incident Coronary Heart Disease in Older Community-Dwelling Adults: The Three-City Study: DISABILITY AND INCIDENT CHD IN OLDER ADULTS. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:636–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hewitt S, Graff-Iversen S. Risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes in disability pensioners aged 40–42 years: A cross-sectional study in Norway. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37:280–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu H, Wu J, Zhang Z, Zheng Y, Niu W, Zheng L, et al. Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Hypertension in Adults with Disabilities: A Cross-Sectional Study in Shanghai. China Clin Epidemiol. 2021;13:769–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stone PH, Libby P, Boden WE. Fundamental Pathobiology of Coronary Atherosclerosis and Clinical Implications for Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease Management-The Plaque Hypothesis: A Narrative Review. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8:192–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DiSantostefano J. International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10). J Nurse Pract. 2009;5:56–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li C, Ma R, Zhang X, Ma J, Wang X, He J, et al. Risk of coronary heart disease in the rural population in Xinjiang: A nested case-control study in China. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0229598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Z. A cohort study on the risk factors of coronary heart disease in middle-aged and old people in rural areas of Jilin province. Jilin University; 2017. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C475KOm_zrgu4lQARvep2SAk-6BvX81hrs37AaEFpExs0EIzDpHSZJcjHo45MuCi9BTkL-UqK1g7x-g2NBQYROpy&uniplatform=NZKPT [Article in Chinese].

  27. Ferrario MM, Veronesi G, Roncaioli M, Holtermann A, Krause N, Clays E, et al. Exploring the interplay between job strain and different domains of physical activity on the incidence of coronary heart disease in adult men. Eur J Prev Cardiolog. 2019;26:1877–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li X, Wang X. Relationships between stroke, depression, generalized anxiety disorder and physical disability: some evidence from the Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health. Psychiatry Res. 2020;290:113074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hreha K, Wong J, Molton I, Nelson IK, Lee D. The impact of stroke on psychological and physical function outcomes in people with long-term physical disability. Disabil Health J. 2020;13:100919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Berceli SA, Borovetz HS, Sheppeck RA, Moosa HH, Warty VS, Armany MA, et al. Mechanisms of vein graft atherosclerosis: LDL metabolism and endothelial actin reorganization. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13:336–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Baeyens N, Bandyopadhyay C, Coon BG, Yun S, Schwartz MA. Endothelial fluid shear stress sensing in vascular health and disease. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:821–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Iring A, Jin Y-J, Albarrán-Juárez J, Siragusa M, Wang S, Dancs PT, et al. Shear stress-induced endothelial adrenomedullin signaling regulates vascular tone and blood pressure. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:2775–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Joseph JJ, Deedwania P, Acharya T, Aguilar D, Bhatt DL, Chyun DA, et al. Comprehensive Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145:e722–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, Joseph L, Pilote L, Poirier P, et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1113–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the support from the leadership of Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center). We would also like to express our appreciation to the Hospital Information Centre and the Medical Examination Centre for their assistance. Lastly, we would like to extend our sincere thanks to the medical officers and interns who helped gather a large amount of health records for individuals with disabilities.

Funding

The study was funded by the Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center (No. SHDC2022CRS049) to Prof. Hengjing Wu and the Shanghai Sailing Program (No. 21YF1443400) to Prof. Yan Xue.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WJ and WHJ conceptualized the paper, acquired funding to support data collection, and led the writing and revision and is the guarantor of this study and its overall content. LHS and WYY supported data collection, led the data analysis and contributed to writing. XY supported data collection, and provided edits and input to the data interpretation and manuscript. LY contributed to writing and editing the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hengjing Wu or Jing Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), School of Medicine, Tongji University (Approval No. YZ 2019–051). In view of the retrospective nature of the study, the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), School of Medicine, Tongji University waived the requirement for informed consent. Prior to statistics analysis, we ensure that all subject information from the SDPRCIP is anonymized and de-identified.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Wang, Y., Xue, Y. et al. Association of demographics, cardiovascular indicators and disability characteristics with 7-year coronary heart disease incident in persons with disabilities. BMC Public Health 23, 1370 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16297-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16297-0

Keywords