Skip to main content
Download PDF

Factors affecting students’ attitudes towards reproductive health in the north of Iran: Designing an educational program

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 1557 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

It is essential to empower young people to promote reproductive health (RH) and develop effective educational programs to prevent risky behaviors. This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting students’ attitudes towards RH based on the ecological model and then design an educational program.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 461 female students aged 18–29 in the north of Iran. This study was done in two stages. In the first stage, factors affecting the attitude towards RH including demographic questionnaire, interpersonal communication skills, family communication pattern, depression, stress and anxiety, body self-image, and self-confidence were determined. In the second stage, an educational program was designed based on the most effective factors. Independent t-test, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression were employed using SPSS version 20 software. Also, STATA version 15 software was utilized for statistical modeling to predict the best predictive model of attitude towards RH.

Results

47.7% of students had a good attitude toward RH. The majority of students had problems with interpersonal communication skills (60.7%). Also, 28.5% experienced depression, 35.8% anxiety, and 12.8% stress at different levels. More than a quarter of the students (26.5%) had poor body self-image and 18.7% had Undesirable self-esteem. Interpersonal skills (P = 0.002), family communication pattern (P = 0.004), stress (p = 0.019), anxiety (P = 0.001), and body self-image (P = 0.034) have a significant relationship with the attitude towards RH. The multiple regression showed that the most important effective factor on RH is the dialogue orientation of family communication pattern (P = 0.041), stress (P = 0.002), and anxiety (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Stress and anxiety management training and the use of dialogue orientation in the family communication pattern for young female students are recommended based on the scientific model.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Today, reproductive health (RH) has been classified under reproductive rights, and its expansion as a guarantee for the health of society and the development of countries depends on the health of young people [1]. During youth, important behavior patterns are formed, including reproductive and sexual attitudes and behaviors [2]. The RH status of young people is a major health issue in any society [1], which has received less attention in our society because it has been regarded as a taboo. Many young people in Iran, regardless of gender, do not benefit from sufficient opportunities to improve their overall health, including RH [2, 3]. While the government has reaffirmed many commitments for young people’s wellbeing such as access to SRH services, policy development falls far short of realizing these commitments [4]. Passing from youth to adulthood without sufficient knowledge and a positive attitude about reproductive and sexual health information and services causes repercussions [5]. As a high-risk group, young people are exposed to smoking, alcohol and drug addiction, sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS, unsuccessful marriages and divorces, infertility, unwanted pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and maternal mortality [6].

Nowadays, with the rapid development of technology and easy access to information sources in the world, young people are more than ever at risk of the influx of false information, especially in the field of RH, which will have a negative impact on their attitudes [7].The existence of a negative attitude toward RH can cause harmful behaviors in young people [8]. Attitude is the first determining factor of behavioral intention, and the more favorable the attitude is toward the behavior, the stronger the individual’s intention is for that conduct [9]. Several intervention programs have been designed to improve the attitude and optimal performance of RH among young people in the world, and a few of them have been successful [4, 10,11,12]. It is believed that the reason for this lack of success is the scarcity of studies on the factors affecting the attitudes and beliefs of young people in the area of RH issues. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain a potential relationship between attitudes and risky sexual behavior. The ecological theory argues that risky sexual behavior among the youth is primarily influenced by three interrelated systems of Microsystem, Mesosystem and Macrosystem [13, 14]. Microsystem includes age, gender, race, marital status, residence place, religion, education level, personality traits, psychological problems, childhood experiences, and body image. The mesosystem comprises the factors such as family structure, relationships with others, and sex education. In the macrosystem, the influence of society’s culture and tradition, economic situation and media are presented [15]. These factors can reliably help us identify the risk and protective factors for the physical and mental health of young people [14].

Several studies have been conducted on the status of young people’s attitudes about RH in different countries [8, 16,17,18] and Iran [2, 13, 19], which mostly investigated knowledge, attitude and performance of young people towards RH. However, few studies have been carried out on the factors affecting young people’s attitudes about RH from an ecological point of view and at the same time designing an educational intervention program based on the most effective factor. It is necessary to comprehensively identify the factors affecting young people’s attitudes towards RH to design educational content that fits the needs of young people’s RH. This is to improve their performance and can lead to the correct implementation of preventive interventions based on the real needs of young people. Considering the importance of the young generation in the development of nations, the present study determines the factors affecting RH attitudes in the first step, and in the second step, designs an educational program based on the most effective factors on RH attitudes.

Methods

Study design

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2018 on the students of public universities (including the University of Technical Engineering, Medical Sciences and Human Sciences) in Babol city, Mazandaran province, Iran. Public universities are funded and regulated by the Iranian government, unlike private universities that are funded by private organizations.

The current study adapted the theoretical framework of the ecological model in the selection of the variables used for analysis [13, 14]. Accordingly, in this study, the microsystem and mesosystem were regarded as psychological factors (depression, anxiety, stress, body self-image and self-esteem) and communication factors (interpersonal communication and family communication pattern) respectively. The results of the macrosystem variables and their relationship with some other factors were published elsewhere [20]. For data collection, each university was visited separately daily. In each university, students’ meeting places including classrooms, self-service, mosques, dormitories, and sports halls were first referred to, and after a full introduction of the topic, purpose and method of the research, the students were invited to cooperate. In the case of the desire and eligibility criteria, the written consent form was completed by the participants and then the questionnaires were distributed among them.

The inclusion criteria consisted of age 18–29 years (according to the age guidelines of the Ministry of Health; integrated care plan) [21], female sex, single at the time of the study, willingness and informed consent to enter the research. The exclusion criteria were failure to answer more than 10% of the questionnaire questions.

Sample size

The sample size required to determine the relationship between the factors affecting the attitude to RH at the confidence level of 95% and the test power of 80% to identify the relationship of r = 0.15 was 400 people(Using G power software), which was calculated with a 15% sample loss of 460 people. For sampling, each university was considered one class. Then, the samples in each class were extracted by random sampling from among the eligible students based on the allocated percentage of the total population required for that class. In this way, after taking into account the number of quotas of each university compared to the total number of single female students 18 to 29 years old studying in that university, 132 samples from Medical Sciences University, 175 samples from Technical and Engineering University and 154 samples from Payam Noor University were included in the study.

Measures

The data collection tools were demographic characteristics (age, residence place, educational level, parents’ education and occupation, family income from the individual’s point of view), RH Attitude Questionnaire [20, 22, 23], Interpersonal Communication Skills Test [24], Revised Family Communication Pattern(RFCP) [25], Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale(DASS) [26], Body Image Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (BI-AAQ)[27], and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Questionnaire[28]. The data collection instruments are shown in Supplementary Material file1.

The average time to answer the questions was 20 min, and during this time the researcher answered the students’ questions. After collecting the questionnaires, prizes were distributed among the students as a token of appreciation.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 software as well as STATA version 15 software for statistical modeling to predict the best predictive model of attitude towards RH. Examining the normality of the data using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and histogram showed that the data were normal. To analyze the data, descriptive statistics methods (mean standard deviation, relative frequency and percentage) and then inferential tests such as independent t-test and ANOVA were used. Also, multiple linear regression using STATA software examined the relationship between psychological (DASS, body image, self-esteem) and communication (family communication pattern Interpersonal communication skills) variables with RH attitude. Also for modeling and selecting the best variables in the regression model, R2 adjust, Mallow cp., and AIC indices were used. Finally, the best model of psychological and communication variables were selected separately. Also to check model defaults, the histogram and Q-Q plot were employed to check the normality of the residuals. Breusch-pagan/cook-Weisberg test was applied to test the homogeneity of error variance in the regression model.

Educational design by James Brown’s method

To design the educational program after determining the most effective factor on RH attitude, James Brown’s regular teaching pattern was adopted (Table 1). The most comprehensive definition of educational technology is provided by James Brown. The model has five parts: identify needs and educational goals (in three parts, general, specific and behavioral goals), educational conditions (in three parts of learning experiences, teaching and learning groups, and teaching methods), educational resources (in three parts of human resources, educational tools and materials, and educational spaces) and efficiency including evaluation and correction [29]. In the central core of this model lies the student element which shows attention to interests, talents and other student characteristics as the primary element of education [30]. Educational design by the James Brown method has been long used by teachers and researchers and has brought positive and successful results [31, 32]. Researchers have used this educational design model in reproductive and sexual health education and also to change the attitude of the target group [29,30,31].

Lesson plan (materials and methods)

After introducing and stating the goals, the pre-test sheets will be distributed to the students to complete it. The students who prefer anonymity on the pre-test sheet will enter a five-letter code of their choice on the top and left side of the pre-test sheet and will remember the desired code for the post-test sheet. After ten minutes, the sheets will be collected. Then the educational content will be taught by the teacher cooperatively and dynamically according to the general, specific and behavioral goals considered in the lesson plan. At the end of each topic, students will be allowed to ask questions.

At the end of the training course, the students who are actively present in all the training hours and obtain the quorum score in the post-test will be given a training certificate. To consolidate the teachings, homework was provided in the form of files and CDs, exercises with the worksheets will be provided in the class and an introduction of the book to the workshop participants. The students will study the educational resources for one month and will use the breathing and relaxation techniques learned in the workshop based on the educational resources provided to them in times of stress and anxiety. Then one month after the workshop, the participants will be provided with the post-test sheet. After 10 min, the sheets will be collected after the student’s code or surname was entered.

In the efficiency section, educational results will be initially evaluated. When correction was required, educational redesign will be performed to solve the educational problem by reviewing all the stages of the model.

Table 1 Designing an educational program based on the James Brown model for the main variables affecting the attitude to reproductive health
Full size table

Results

Out of the 461 respondents, the majority (62.3%) were between 18 and 21 years old .The majorities (83.3%) were an undergraduate and general practitioner. The demographic characteristics are shown in Table 2. The mean score of attitudes toward RH was 58.34 ± 7.05 with a minimum score of 38 and a maximum of 80. Moreover, 47.7% of the students had a good attitude toward RH.

Table 2 Demographic characteristics of the participants
Full size table

Notably, 60.7% of the students had interpersonal communication problems. The most common family communication pattern (70.3%) was dialogue orientation. Also, 10.7% showed moderate to severe depression, 23% moderate to severe anxiety and 12.8% mild to moderate stress. Almost half of the students (49.5%) had a good/very good body self-image. Finally, 18.7% reported undesirable self-esteem (Table 3).

Table 3 The communication and psychological variables of the participants
Full size table

The association of interpersonal communication with attitude towards RH showed that capable students, compared to individuals with communication problems (P = 0.002), and the students with dialogue orientation in the family, compared to the alignment orientation, showed a more significant attitude (P = 0.004). Among the psychological variables, anxiety (P = 0.001), stress (P = 0.019) and good body self-image (P = 0.034) demonstrated a significant relationship with the attitude towards RH (Table 4).

Table 4 The association of communication and psychological variables with the participants’ attitude to reproductive health
Full size table

The results of multiple linear regression analysis to determine the effective factors on RH attitude revealed that according to the determination coefficient of regression analysis, communication variables 5.3%, psychological variables 8.5% and the simultaneous presence of communication and psychological variables explained 10% of changes in RH attitude (Table 5).

Table 5 The relationship between communication and psychological variables with attitudes towards reproductive health
Full size table

  • -The results are adjusted for age, self-religion, conversation with parents about RH concepts, living with parents, use of satellite, smoking, alcohol, and participation in youth parties.

  • -Multiple linear regression analysis.

The major factor affecting students’ RH attitude was stress, anxiety and family communication pattern as found by multiple linear regression. Therefore, the educational design was made based on James Brown’s systematic educational model. Based on this, the students participate in a three-day workshop with three educational topics: stress management for 3 h, anxiety control for 3 h, and familiarization with dialogue orientation in family communication for 1.5 h. The pre-test and post-test are conducted using DASS and RFCP questionnaires before and one month after the workshop. The training program is shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Material file2.

Discussion

The study results to determine the influencing factors on the attitude of young students towards RH revealed that ability in interpersonal communication, as well as the dialogue orientation in family communication, was associated with a better attitude towards RH. Also, among the psychological variables, anxiety, stress and good body self-image had a significant relationship with the attitude of RH. In the present study, an ecological approach was adopted to achieve a more complete understanding of the factors affecting attitude; an approach that demonstrates the interaction between multiple levels of health outcomes. Researchers rarely move beyond individualistic approaches in terms of attitude to RH [32]. The present study is unique in analyzing the factors affecting the attitude of young people on RH with a systemic approach.

Our study showed that individuals capable of interpersonal communications had a better attitude to RH than people with communication problems. Effective interpersonal communication enhances physical and mental health and improves adverse attitudes and risky behaviors. Also, self-esteem and the ability of individuals to deal with life’s problems are largely influenced by interpersonal communication [33]. A study of Iranian students showed that 57.3% of them had a communication problem and 0.6% had an acute communication problem. Therefore, the researchers found it necessary to hold educational workshops to improve students’ communication skills [34]. Some studies mentioned peer pressure and interpersonal communication as the most important factor in risky behaviors in teenagers [35, 36]. A study on the importance of interpersonal communications in American black students showed that interpersonal health strategies are essential along with sexual behavior training to make changes in sexual beliefs and behaviors [37]. However, other studies have shown that interpersonal communications reinforce the effects of intervention after being exposed to sexual health interventions [38, 39]. A systematic meta-analysis of 28 studies has shown that mass media can help to some extent in understanding the norms associated with a behavior, but conversations with others provide a more detailed understanding of the normative values of a behavior that can influence attitudes, intentions, or behavior [40]. Brindis et al. (2020) in the United States proposed a multi-faceted approach to reducing pregnancy in adolescents, including radio, theater, interpersonal communication and inter-generational dialogue [41]. A study in Nepal also showed that interventions based on dialogue were efficacious in changing behavior and preventing abortion in the country [42]. Therefore, upgrading interpersonal communication skills in young people plays an important role in preventing high-risk behaviors.

The present study also revealed that the family’s most common communication pattern was the dialogue pattern, and the students in these families had a better attitude to RH. It is well known that family characteristics and communication between its members play an important role in preventing high-risk behaviors and mental health of young people [43, 44]. The family environment is the best place for the emotional and social development of children and has the greatest impact on how the young behave and understand themselves. Members of high-dialogue families interact freely and constantly and make collective decisions. In such families, children consult their parents instead of searching information in magazines and websites and gaining information from peers [25, 45]. The studies showed that dialogue orientation in the family communication pattern directly improves students’ ability to adapt to needs and tackle stressors to achieve academic and social success [46,47,48]. Studies also showed the effects of good family communication on improving the quality of young people’s life [45], reduced the likelihood of sexual intercourse in girls [49], personality traits and reduced anxiety and depression in youth [50].

The present study focused on the relationship between stress and anxiety with the attitude of RH. There are few studies on the impact of psychological factors (depression, stress, and anxiety) on student RH attitudes. A study in Bosnia and Herzegovina indicated a high prevalence of stress among students. Therefore, the researchers considered stress management and mental health interventions necessary for students [51]. Another study on young Mexican American women showed that individual factors such as stress, anxiety, self-efficacy, beliefs, family factors (parental relationship with children and educating children on sexual issues), and peers impact the start or delay of sexual intercourse [52]. The study of Karle et al. showed that poor mental health was associated with increasing high-risk sexual behavior in Swedish youth [15]. Maintaining mental health is critical for safer sexual behavior in young people. Studies around the world have found a relationship between psychological symptoms and high-risk sexual behaviors among young people [53,54,55]. Accordingly, identifying important sources of stress and anxiety in young people and their control methods can play an important role in improving the attitude of RH.

Self-esteem and body self-image also play an important role in young people’s health. The negative perception of one’s body image reduces self-esteem, which in turn increases psychological distress. Self-esteem is a major predictor in young people that affect interpersonal relationships and academic performance. On the contrary, low self-esteem affects aggression, antisocial behavior, youth delinquency, and negative changes in body image [56]. The body self-image is a predictor of the mental health of young people that can influence healthy or unhealthy behaviors because of its relationship with the physical, cognitive and emotional dimensions of people. A positive body self-image is can prevent health problems in students [57]. A study on Romanian students also showed that body dissatisfaction in women depends on the level of self-esteem [56]. Lin et al. study (2018) on students at Taiwan University also showed that body self-image and self-esteem are the main predictors of sexual satisfaction [58]. The relationship between self-esteem and the general health of the students [59], as an indicator of transactional sex in young African women [55], Pakistani students’ academic performance [60], addiction and pathological use of the Internet and Social Media and life satisfaction in students have been well investigated [61].

Reproductive-sexual health is central in education, has an important role in the formation of human personality, and has an impact on their thoughts, emotions, attitudes and behaviors of young people [2]. Many factors can affect young people’s attitude to RH, mainly communication and psychological factors. Investigating the factors affecting youth attitudes on RH helps identify the risks and factors in the physical and mental health of youth [15]. Scientific and community-based perspectives can improve performance in youth RH and can properly implement preventive interventions based on the real needs of the youth [11].

Limitations and Strengths

A limitation of this study is the use of a self-reporting questionnaire. Young people typically avoid discussing sex issues. Therefore, answers to the sex-related questions are commonly vague. Data were also collected only from female students and the results may not be generalized to all young people. Strength of this study is the employment of an ecological model in examining the factors affecting RH. It is also possible to mention the acceptable sample size, the detailed design and implementation of the study and finally the presentation of an educational program based on the James Brown model.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that stress, anxiety and family communication patterns are major factors affecting the attitude of RH in young female students. Given that adverse attitudes toward RH can expose young people to irreversible psychological and physiological damages, designing educational programs to improve interpersonal communications and control stress and anxiety based on scientific models can raise awareness and create a favorable attitude in RH to prevent the consequences of adverse attitudes and high-risk behaviors in young people. Finally, parental education, especially on how to communicate and provide information to young people, should not be overlooked.

Data Availability

Data about individual identified samples of this research will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request after the main results of the research have been published.

References

  1. Benyamini Y, Todorova I. Women’s reproductive health in sociocultural context. Int J Behav Med. 2017;24(6):799–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Farahani FK. Adolescents and young people’s sexual and reproductive health in Iran: a conceptual review. J Sex Res. 2020;57(6):743–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohammadi F, Kohan S, Mostafavi F, Gholami A. The Stigma of Reproductive Health Services utilization by unmarried women. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18(3):e24231. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4884608/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Khalajabadi Farahani F, Darabi F, Yaseri M. The Effect of theory-based HIV/AIDS educational program on preventive behaviors among female adolescents in tehran: a Randomized Controlled Trial. 2020;21(3):194–206.

  5. Beymer M, Willmes CG. Fruitful futures for reproductive health. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2021;32(8):531–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Swartzendruber A, Brown JL, Sales JM, Windle M, Haardörfer R. Age-related associations between substance use and sexual risk behavior among high-risk young african american women in the South. Addict Behav. 2019;96:110–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gollub EL, Beauvais S, Roye C. College-attending young men’s sexual and reproductive health knowledge, attitudes and practices. J Am Coll Health. 2022;70(3):706–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zakaria M, Karim F, Mazumder S, Cheng F, Xu J. Knowledge on, attitude towards, and practice of sexual and reproductive health among older adolescent girls in Bangladesh: an Institution-Based cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):7720.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Howe LC, Krosnick JA. Attitude strength. Annu Rev Psychol. 2017;68:327–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Darabi F, Yaseri M, Kaveh MH, Khalajabadi Farahani F, Majlessi F, Shojaeizadeh D. The Effect of a theory of planned behavior-based educational intervention on sexual and reproductive health in iranian adolescent girls: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Res Health Sci. 2017;17(4):e00400. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29233954/.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Denno DM, Hoopes AJ, Chandra-Mouli V. Effective strategies to provide adolescent sexual and reproductive health services and to increase demand and community support. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(1):22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Desrosiers A, Betancourt T, Kergoat Y, Servilli C, Say L, Kobeissi L. A systematic review of sexual and reproductive health interventions for young people in humanitarian and lower-and-middle-income country settings. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):666. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32398129/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Arabi-Mianrood H, Hamzehgardeshi Z, Khoori E, Moosazadeh M, Shahhosseini Z. Influencing factors on high-risk sexual behaviors in young people: an ecological perspective. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2017 19;31(2):j/ijamh.2019.31.issue-2/ijamh-2016-0162/ijamh-2016-0162.xml.

  14. Khuzwayo N, Taylor M. Exploring the socio-ecological levels for prevention of sexual risk behaviours of the youth in uMgungundlovu District Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018;10(1):e1–e8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29781679/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karle A, Agardh A, Larsson M, Arunda MO. Risky sexual behavior and self-rated mental health among young adults in Skåne, Sweden - a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36597068/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kilfoyle KA, Vitko M, O’Conor R, Bailey SC. Health literacy and women’s reproductive health: a systematic review. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016;25(12):1237–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazza D, Botfield JR. Sexual and reproductive health. Semin Reprod Med. 2022;40(5–06):227–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zou S, Cao W, Jia Y, Wang Z, Qi X, Shen J, Tang K. Sexual and reproductive health and attitudes towards sex of young adults in China. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2022;48(e1):e13–e21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33504512/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Honarvar B, Salehi F, Barfi R, Asadi Z, Honarvar H, Odoomi N, Arefi N, Lankarani KB. Attitudes toward and experience of singles with premarital sex: a Population-Based study in Shiraz, Southern Iran. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(2):395–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kashefi F, Bakhtiari A, Pasha H, Amiri FN, Bakouei F. Student attitudes about reproductive health in public universities: a cross-sectional study. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2021;41(2):133–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. Minister of Health and Medical Education. Islamic Republic of Iran health profile 2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/253768?show=full.

  22. Cleland J, Ingham R, Stone N. Asking young people about sexual and reproductive behaviours: illustrative core instruments. Occasional report no 13. Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, Geneva. 2001:1–103. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45te-exjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=3201214.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olfati F, Aligholi S. A study on educational needs of teenager girls regarding the reproductive health and determination of proper strategies in achieving the target goals in Qazvin. J Inflamm Dis. 2008;12(2):76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vakili MM, Hidarnia AR, Niknami S. Development and psychometrics of an interpersonal communication skills scale (A.S.M.A) among Zanjan health volunteers. J Hayat. 2012;18(1):5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hassanzadeh M. Investigation of the relationship between family communication patterns and social creativity in students. IJBS. 2013;7(2):109–16.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kakemam E, Navvabi E, Albelbeisi AH, Saeedikia F, Rouhi A, Majidi S. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of depression anxiety stress Scale-21 items (DASS-21) in a sample of health professionals: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):111. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35078477/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Izaadi A, Karimi J, Rahmani M. Psychometric analysis of persian version of body image flexibility questionnaire (BI-AAQ) among University students. J Hayat. 2013;19(3):56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shapurian R, Hojat M, Nayerahmadi H. Psychometric characteristics and dimensionality of a persian version of Rosenberg Self-esteem scale. Percept Mot Skills. 1987;65(1):27–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Khodakarami B, Aligholi S. The Effect of education based on James Brown Pattern on Knowledge of Reproductive & sexual health in women participant marriage council classes in Hamadan. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2011;19(1):52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yosefi Z, Afshar M, Mirbagher Ajorpaz N, Sadat Z. The Effect of training based on James Brown Model on self-efficacy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2021;31(2):76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Salazar LF, Bradley EL, Younge SN, Daluga NA, Crosby RA, Lang DL, DiClemente RJ. Applying ecological perspectives to adolescent sexual health in the United States: rhetoric or reality? Health Educ Res. 2010;25(4):552–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Abedini S, Nooraddin S, Ghanbarnejad A. The effectiveness of educational programs based on james brown model on knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to nutritional iron deficiency anemia in female high school students. J Chem Pharm Res. 2015;7(10):664–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Munro-Kramer ML, Skidmore LM, Cannon LM, Huhman AK, Carter SN, Williamsen KM, Ngo QM. The Dynamics of interpersonal relationships: understanding power and control tactics among college students. J Interpers Violence. 2022;37(21–22):NP19522–48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34482755/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Namazi A, Homauonfar H. Assessment of interpersonal communication skills and related factors in nursing and midwifery students. Health_Based Res. 2017;2(4):369–80.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cherie A, Berhane Y. Peer pressure is the prime driver of risky sexual behaviors among school adolescents in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. World J AIDS. 2012;2(3):159–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Srahbzu M, Tirfeneh E. Risky sexual behavior and associated factors among adolescents aged 15–19 years at governmental high schools in Aksum Town, Tigray, Ethiopia, 2019: an Institution-Based, cross-sectional study. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:3719845.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Francis DB, Zelaya CM, Fortune DA, Noar SM. Black college women’s interpersonal communication in response to a sexual health intervention: a mixed methods study. Health Commun. 2021;36(2):217–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Helme DW, Noar SM, Allard S, Zimmerman RS, Palmgreen P, McClanahan KJ. In-depth investigation of interpersonal discussions in response to a safer sex mass media campaign. Health Commun. 2011;26(4):366–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Frank LB, Chatterjee JS, Chaudhuri ST, Lapsansky C, Bhanot A, Murphy ST. Conversation and compliance: role of interpersonal discussion and social norms in public communication campaigns. J Health Commun. 2012;17(9):1050–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jeong M, Bae RE. The effect of campaign-generated interpersonal communication on campaign-targeted Health Outcomes: a Meta-analysis. Health Commun. 2018;33(8):988–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brindis CD, Decker MJ, Gutmann-Gonzalez A, Berglas NF. Perspectives on adolescent pregnancy prevention strategies in the United States: looking back, looking Forward. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2020;11:135–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Bingham A, Drake JK, Goodyear L, Gopinath CY, Kaufman A, Bhattarai S. The role of interpersonal communication in preventing unsafe abortion in communities: the dialogues for life project in Nepal. J Health Commun. 2011;16(3):245–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Farahani FK, Cleland J, Mehryar AH. Associations between family factors and premarital heterosexual relationships among female college students in Tehran. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;37(1):30–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Muhwezi WW, Katahoire AR, Banura C, Mugooda H, Kwesiga D, Bastien S, Klepp KI. Perceptions and experiences of adolescents, parents and school administrators regarding adolescent-parent communication on sexual and reproductive health issues in urban and rural Uganda. Reprod Health. 2015;12:110. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26621129/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Mashalpoure Fard M. The relationship between family communication patterns and adjustment with resiliency in children. J Res Health. 2020;10(4):267–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ghaffari M, Esmali A, Mohammadi R. The mediating role of family communication patterns in the relationship between emotional maturity and self-compassion with vulnerability to stress in soldiers. JPMed. 2021;10(4):287–92.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dorrance Hall E, Scharp K, Sanders M, Beaty L. Family communication patterns and the mediating effects of support and resilience on students’ concerns about college. Fam Relat. 2020;69(2):273–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ehyakonandeh M, Yousefi F. Relationship between family communication patterns and adjustment to university: mediating role of coping strategies. J Family Res. 2017;13(50):273–91. [In Persian].

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rahimi M, Meratian N, Zareei Mahmoodabadi H. The role of family communication dimensions in adolescents’ depression with the mediation of cognitive flexibility. J Fundamentals Mental Health. 2018;20(5):289–97.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ajeli Lahiji L, Besharat MA. The role of personality traits in predicting family functioning and quality of life among nurses, Shiraz, Iran 2017–2018. J Occup Health Epidemiol. 2019;8(2):81–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Racic M, Todorovic R, Ivkovic N, Masic S, Joksimovic B, Kulic M. Self- perceived stress in relation to anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life among health professions students: a cross-sectional study from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Zdr Varst. 2017;56(4):251–59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Gilliam ML, Berlin A, Kozloski M, Hernandez M, Grundy M. Interpersonal and personal factors influencing sexual debut among mexican-american young women in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41(5):495–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lehrer JA, Shrier LA, Gortmaker S, Buka S. Depressive symptoms as a longitudinal predictor of sexual risk behaviors among US middle and high school students. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):189–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lundberg P, Rukundo G, Ashaba S, Thorson A, Allebeck P, Ostergren PO, Cantor-Graae E. Poor mental health and sexual risk behaviours in Uganda: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:125. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21338500/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Giovenco D, Kahn K, Hughes JP, MacPhail C, Wagner R, Pettifor A. Self-esteem as an Indicator of Transactional Sex among Young Women in Rural South Africa (HPTN 068). AIDS Behav. 2020;24(3):823–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Duchesne AP, Dion J, Lalande D, Bégin C, Émond C, Lalande G, et al. Body dissatisfaction and psychological distress in adolescents: is self-esteem a mediator? J Health Psychol. 2017;22(12):1563–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ganesan S, Ravishankar SL, Ramalingam S. Are body image issues affecting our adolescents? A cross-sectional study among college going adolescent girls. Indian J Community Med. 2018;43(Suppl 1):42–S46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30686874/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lin H-C, Lin Y-C. The study of body image, self-esteem and sexual satisfaction of college students in southern Taiwan. Univers J Educational Res. 2018;6(4):647–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zare N, Daneshpajooh F, Amini M, Razeghi M, Fallahzadeh MH. The relationship between self-esteem, general health and academic achievement in students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2007;7(1):59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Arshad M, Zaidi SM, Mahmood D. Self-esteem & academic performance among university students. J Educ Pract. 2015;6(5):156–62.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Niemz K, Griffiths M, Banyard P. Prevalence of pathological internet use among university students and correlations with self-esteem, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), and disinhibition. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8(6):562–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the students who have shown the utmost cooperation in this study, as well as all the effective factors in the implementation of the project.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Vice-Chancellery of Research and Technology of Babol University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

    Afsaneh Bakhtiari, Hajar Pasha & Fatemeh Nasiri-Amiri

  2. Population, Family and Spiritual Research Core, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Sciences, Babol, Islamic Republic of Iran

    Hajar Pasha

  3. Student Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

    Fatemeh Kashefi

  4. Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Islamic Republic of Iran

    Fatemeh Bakouei

  5. Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Islamic Republic of Iran

    Fatemeh Bakouei

Authors
  1. Afsaneh Bakhtiari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hajar Pasha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatemeh Kashefi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fatemeh Nasiri-Amiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fatemeh Bakouei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.B. and H.P. and F.K. Conceptualization,Writing original draft preparation,Writing review and editing ,project administration,formal analysis, and supervision. F.N.A.,F.B ;Investigation writing reviewing and editing ,formal analysis.A.B.,H.P; Methodology,software,validation,data curation. All authors read and approved the final maniscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hajar Pasha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

This study was confirmed by the ethics committee of the Babol University of Medical Sciences with the ethical code IR.MUBABOL.HRI.REC.1397.129. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the research commenced. The research was conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication.

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Data collection instruments.

Additional file 2.

Appendix.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakhtiari, A., Pasha, H., Kashefi, F. et al. Factors affecting students’ attitudes towards reproductive health in the north of Iran: Designing an educational program. BMC Public Health 23, 1557 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16217-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16217-2

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us