Skip to main content

Forced intercourse in America: a pandemic update



Measures of forced intercourse from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) indicate high prevalence among U.S. women, which is likely to produce unintended pregnancies. However, NCHS did not measure forced intercourse during the pandemic, limiting knowledge of recent prevalence rates.


We use multiple nationally-representative, cross-sectional surveys representing the U.S. population from 2011 to 2022 to document these trends. This includes measures from the National Survey of Family Growth, the Panel Study of Income Dynamics Transition into Adulthood Supplement, and the American Family Health Study (AFHS) to provide population estimates of forced intercourse.


Reports of forced intercourse remained high during the pandemic, with more than 25% of U.S. females over 40 reporting lifetime forced intercourse in the AFHS (number of females in AFHS: 1,042). There was a significant increase among females aged 24–28 (p < 0.05) and rates are highest for those who did not complete college. Among females 24–28, 32.5% (S.E. = 5.7%) with less than 4 years of college reported forced intercourse, a significantly (p < 0.05) higher rate than among those with a higher level of education.


Rates of forced intercourse among U.S. women remained high during the pandemic, increasing significantly in early adulthood. This exposure to forced intercourse is likely to produce an increase in unintended pregnancies and other sexual, reproductive, and mental health problems.

Peer Review reports


The U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) monitors national rates of forced intercourse as an important element of reproductive health, with potential consequences for rates of unintended pregnancy and childbearing [1, 2]. All forms of sexual assault are important for health and well-being because the consequences include many negative physical and mental health outcomes. These adverse consequences of sexual assault include sexually transmitted infections, unintended pregnancies, or injuries including death [3,4,5]. Robust associations have been reported between sexual assault and post-traumatic stress disorder [6], major depressive disorder [7], generalized anxiety disorder [8], and suicide attempt [9]. The experience of forced intercourse, in particular, can have severe long-term adverse health consequences [10].

The COVID-19 pandemic, and measures taken to reduce transmission, dramatically changed daily life: work in many sectors stopped; some employees began working remotely; and childcare, meal preparation, and other daily tasks returned to the home, at least more often. These interruptions reduced social interactions, with potential consequences for courtship processes like meeting potential partners, dating, and transitioning to sexual, co-residential, and marital relationships. Early evidence from the pandemic indicates that rates of intercourse in the U.S. declined overall [11].

Before the pandemic, the U.S. had a high prevalence of forced intercourse [12]. For example, in 2011–2013, 25% of women reported ever experiencing forced intercourse by age 44 (Table 1). The pandemic may have decreased rates of forced intercourse by reducing sexual activity overall (eTable 1 provides more detail [see Additional file 1]). However, the pandemic also had the potential to increase forced intercourse. It is possible that pandemic-related changes forced couples to spend more time together, even those in unhealthy relationships. For couples who would have divorced or separated (including seeking temporary shelter from an abusive partner), the pandemic may have made moving or finding alternative housing more difficult. Such circumstances would have high potential to intensify negative relationships. Likewise, for those already separated or divorced, economic hardship associated with the pandemic may have increased interactions with a former partner who had been abusive [13]. This mechanism would also increase exposure to negative relationships. Physical violence between intimate partners is considered the most severe dimension of negative relationships, reproduced through sexual violence and forced intercourse, making these among the worst forms of intimate partner violence [12, 14]. Forced intercourse also has clear implications for pregnancy and childbearing: forced intercourse rarely involves effective contraception, thus increasing the probability of unintended pregnancy [15].

Table 1 Percentage of the U.S. Population Aged 18–44/49 Reporting “Ever Forced to Have Intercourse”

The pandemic also interrupted education; for many young adults, this meant moving away from college campuses to continue their education remotely or dropping out. Research demonstrates that the probability of experiencing a sexual assault is high among college students [16,17,18,19]. The Association of American Universities estimates that on many campuses more than 20% of undergraduate women experience sexual assaults each year [16]. Those rates remained consistently high on American university campuses just before the pandemic, actually increasing at some universities [20]. However, multiple nationally-representative studies show that students enrolled in college are less likely to experience sexual assaults than peers not enrolled in college [12, 21,22,23].

We document the extent to which rates of forced intercourse in the U.S. population remained stable before the pandemic and changed during the pandemic, including the association between educational attainment and forced intercourse. We use the NCHS’s National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) and two other nationally representative data sources which replicate the NSFG measurement of forced intercourse: the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics Transition into Adulthood Supplement (PSID-TAS, 2017 and 2019) and the American Family Health Study (AFHS 2020–2022). A unique data resource, the AFHSFootnote 1 is an important breakthrough in survey design for population science [24], and as a web survey it was ideally positioned to succeed during the pandemic. These three data sources are ideal for measuring trends, or disruptions in trends, because they use the same wording to measure forced intercourse. However, these studies only measure forced intercourse. Forced intercourse represents just under half of all sexual assaults, but it is a severe form of sexual assault, with many associated health risks and with potential for long-term adverse consequences [10, 16, 18].


The U.S. has multiple studies of the general population that can be used for a population-level investigation of sexual assault, including forced intercourse. The National Research Council recently conducted a thorough review of the survey measurement of sexual assault, identifying many important strengths and weaknesses [25]. For example, they concluded that the U.S. National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) likely underestimates the prevalence of sexual assault because of the in-person administration of NCVS interviews (which reduces privacy), the use of a screening measure with little context, and the criminal behavior focus of that survey [25]. By contrast, surveys conducted in modes that offer more privacy, place questions about sexual assault in a context of other relationship- and sex-related questions, and are presented to respondents as measuring a broader range of experiences than crimes are likely to obtain more complete reports of sexual assault. The three survey data sources used accomplish each of these goals: more private modes, sexual assault is asked in the context of all relationship experiences, and the surveys do not focus on crime. As fully nationally representative data sources, the three surveys used represent all Americans independent of their socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, language, nationality, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, geography, ability, age, or culture.

The NSFG was specifically designed to serve as the national source of statistics on sexual relationships, reproductive health, childbearing, and other related topics [2]. It is an important data source for studying sexual assault because it features lifetime histories of sexual partnerships, pregnancies, sex, and reproductive health issues. It also uses audio-computer assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) to provide privacy and immediate response encryption while asking questions about sensitive reproductive health issues, such as forced intercourse. The NSFG offers a nationally-representative sample of persons aged 15–49, private measurement of experiences with forced intercourse outside of a criminal context, and response rates that generally exceed 70% (reducing potential nonresponse bias [26]). Specific wording used in the NSFG measures and a discussion of issues related to respondent interpretation of the questions were previously published [12].

We used publicly available NSFG data (2011–2017) to update the pre-pandemic trends in experiences of forced intercourse. Professional interviewers conducted face-to-face interviews with ACASI for some sensitive items (including forced intercourse) in a probability-based, nationally-representative, area-clustered sample. The NSFG data collection from 2011 to 2013 interviewed 10,416 respondents aged 15–44 (72.8% response rate), from 2013 to 2015 interviewed 10,210 respondents aged 15–44 (69.3% response rate), and from 2015 to 2017 interviewed 10,094 respondents aged 15–49 (65.3% response rate) [27]. NSFG measures of forced intercourse are limited to those aged 18 and over. Weights constructed to account for the complex nature of the NSFG sample design, along with stratum and cluster codes for variance estimation, were used for our analysis. We note that the NCHS chose not to release forced intercourse measures in unrestricted public data for the NSFG 2017–2019, despite having done so previouslyFootnote 2.

The 2017 PSID-TASFootnote 3 collected data from 2,526 males and females aged 18–28 (87% response rate). The PSID-TAS age restriction necessitated restricting the ages of other samples when comparing to these data. Data were collected by telephone from October 2017 to June 2018. The 2019 PSID-TAS3 introduced a web option for data collection in addition to telephone, which yielded interviews from 2,595 males and females between November 2019 and July 2020 (86% response rate). Both studies replicated the NSFG wording for measures of forced intercourse. Estimates in this analysis incorporated the cross-sectional weight that accounts for the original PSID selection probability, non-response, differential eligibility, and calibration to known features of the population of interest [28, 29].

The AFHSFootnote 4 was designed to collect data from two national sample replicates, fielded from April 2020 through April 2022. The AFHS uses a mixed-mode web/mail protocol to screen a random address-based probability sample of U.S. households and identify eligible household members aged 18–49. One randomly selected eligible respondent within each household is invited to complete the study, which replicates the content of the NSFG. Both the screening questionnaire and the survey were designed to be completed online, but can also be completed by returning paper questionnaires through the mail; like the use of ACASI to measure forced intercourse in the NSFG, the use of these self-administered modes is expected to increase reporting of this type of sensitive experience [30]. Estimates in this analysis focused on 1,914 respondents aged 18–49 who responded to questions on forced intercourse and 596 respondents aged 18–28 to match the PSID-TAS. These estimates incorporated the final survey weights, in addition to bootstrap replicate weights that correctly reflect the stratified sample design and account for all nonresponse adjustments and calibration adjustments applied to the sampling weights. Particularly important, no area cluster sampling was necessary for the AFHS, introducing cost and statistical efficiency relative to face-to-face approaches [24]. One consequence of this efficiency is the ability to achieve reliable estimates with fewer interviews. All analyses were performed using appropriate SURVEY procedures in SAS (version 9.4). The code is available upon request.

Outcome measures

Our binary indicator for ever being forced to have intercourse (1 = Yes, 0 = No) was derived from two questions. If the respondent indicated that first sex was not voluntary or if they reported ever being forced to have sex, they were coded as ever forced to have intercourse.Footnote 5

Analytic approach

We first generated descriptive estimates of the percentages of subgroups defined by age and gender ever experiencing forced intercourse in 2011–2017, and 2020–2022 among those aged 18–49 based on the NSFG and AFHS data sources. Next, we focused on younger Americans, adding the PSID-TAS data (2017 and 2019) and restricting the age range to match PSID-TAS [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Finally, we estimated the association between the cumulative experience of college attendance and rates of ever experiencing forced intercourse, focusing on men and women aged 24–28. By these ages, many Americans with college experience have finished attending college. This approach allowed us to compare the cumulative experience of ever being forced to have intercourse across different levels of completed college experience. We used a dichotomous measure of college attendance—less than four years of college attendance vs. four or more years of college attendance—to maintain comparability across data sources.

Though we provide estimates across the full age ranges studied (18–49 and 18–28), we also provide estimates for narrower age-range subgroups (e.g., 20–24). This addition is important because narrower age groups differ substantially in exposure to the risk of ever being forced to have intercourse. Not only do more years of life increase the time of exposure, but different birth cohorts also live through different periods that may alter risks. For example, new risks created by social distancing during the pandemic may differ greatly by birth cohort. Thus, even within the analyses of those aged 18–28, we provide additional documentation of even narrower age groups, 18–23 and 24–28, because these cohorts differ in their exposures to risk. We treat differences at the p < 0.05 level as statistically significant unless otherwise noted.


Estimated rates of forced intercourse

We estimate that approximately 20% of U.S. women aged 18–49 have ever been forced to have vaginal intercourse, and that this rate appears roughly stable into the pandemic (Table 1). However, the age-specific rates demonstrate increases during the pandemic among women aged 20 and over, with the biggest difference among women aged 20–24. This difference is an increase from both NSFG 2015–2017 (marginally significant at p = 0.08) and NSFG 2011–2013 (significant, p < 0.05). We focused on the younger ages in subsequent analyses.

Men also had this experience, at a lower rate (Table 1). From 2011 to 2017 and into the pandemic (2020–2022), these rates appeared stable, with approximately 6% of men reporting lifetime experiences of forced intercourse (Table 1). Forced intercourse for men includes both vaginal intercourse forced by women and oral or anal intercourse forced by men.

Ages 18–28 only

Next, we focused on ages 18–28 to add measures from the PSID-TAS and focus on pandemic-specific increases in forced intercourse at younger ages. First, consider women (Table 2). Reports of lifetime experience of forced intercourse are lower in the PSID-TAS sample than in NSFG or AFHS. However, comparing AFHS results to other results in Table 2, we find an increase in reporting of lifetime forced intercourse among those aged 18–28 during the pandemic that is particularly large among those aged 24–28. The highest pre-pandemic estimate for this age group is the 2015–2017 NSFG and the pandemic-specific estimate from AFHS is 10% points higher. This difference is significant (p < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2 Percentage of the U.S. Population Aged 18–28 Reporting “Ever Forced to Have Intercourse”

Although the modes of data collection varied across studies, with NSFG using ACASI, PSID-TAS 2017 using primarily phone, PSID-TAS 2019 using primarily web, and AFHS using primarily web, observed differences across data sets do not appear to correspond to mode of interview. Rather, the AFHS, which repeats all of the NSFG context of questions about lifetime experiences of all types of sexual relationships and reproductive health issues, looks the most similar to NSFG. PSID-TAS has much less content on sexual and reproductive health than either NSFG or AFHS, which may be part of the explanation for lower observed rates in that study. Although the self-administered web mode in AFHS may have produced more honest reporting of experience with forced intercourse, the vast majority of measures unlikely to be affected by the pandemic remained consistent between the NSFG and AFHS [31]. But national estimates of the prevalence of forced intercourse for women aged 24–28 from 2020 to 2022 are higher than all other time periods.

Next, consider younger men (Table 2). Three results are clear among men aged 18–28. First, similar to women, rates of reporting lifetime experience of forced intercourse are much lower in PSID-TAS than in NSFG or AFHS. Again, it is possible that the context of prior questions on lifetime experiences with all types of sexual relationships and a range of reproductive health issues improves reporting in NSFG/AFHS. Second, similar to the wider age range, men report forced intercourse at much lower rates than women. Third, in contrast to women, there is no evidence of a pandemic-specific increase in experiences of forced intercourse among younger men.

College attendance and forced intercourse

For those aged 24–28, the 2011–2013 NSFG data indicate that women who either never attended college or who attended less than four years of college were twice as likely to have ever experienced forced intercourse compared to women who attended four or more years of college (p < 0.01, Table 3). This result replicates findings reported previously [12]. However, beginning with the 2015–2017 NSFG, this difference shrinks to become non-significant. The shrinking size of the difference in 2015–2017 is as much because of an increase in the rates of forced intercourse among women who had completed four or more years of college as it is because of a decline among women who had completed less than four years of college. Identifying the causes of this change is beyond the scope of the current project, but it may involve factors that shape risks differently for more educated women. The difference by level of college education continues to be non-significant when considering the PSID-TAS data (Table 3).

Table 3 Percentage of U.S. Females Aged 24–28 Reporting “Ever Forced to Have Intercourse” by Education

However, when considering the pandemic-specific 2020–2022 AFHS data, the difference by years of college returns to more than double and significant, despite the smaller sample size (p < 0.05, Table 3). The rates of forced intercourse among women aged 24–28 who completed four or more years of college during the pandemic are quite similar to those documented before the pandemic in the NSFG 2015–2017 data. But the rates of forced intercourse among women with less education during the pandemic are nearly double those in the NSFG 2015–2017. Not only did rates of forced intercourse among young women rise during the pandemic, but the increase is also mainly among women with less education.


Forced intercourse is a high-prevalence public health issue, a large-scale social issue, a safety priority, and a national concern. By 2017 the #MeToo movement increased popular attention to this issue and may have reduced the stigma of reporting these experiences. The experience of forced intercourse has a particularly high potential for long-term adverse health consequences [10]. Even though forced intercourse represents less than half of all sexual assaults, our analyses reveal that about 1 in 5 U.S. women aged 18–49 have experienced forced intercourse. This total population rate of forced intercourse remained stable from 2011 to 2022. Given the substantial health and well-being risks associated with this experience, this high rate of forced intercourse continues to be a substantial national health risk.

The steps taken to control the spread of COVID-19 created circumstances that could have contributed to higher rates of forced intercourse. Although social distancing reduced entry into sexual relationships, for those already in sexual relationships rates of exit may have also been reduced. Opportunities for socializing declined, giving those in adverse intimate relationships less contact with others and potentially less opportunity to move. Rates of abuse and violence may have increased in adverse sexual relationships. Our results show that rates of forced intercourse among younger women—aged 24–28—increased in reports collected from late 2020 through early 2022 relative to previous reports.

The well-documented educational difference in forced intercourse shows that those who completed less than four years of college had significantly higher rates of forced intercourse than peers who completed four years of college [12]. We found that this difference between those who completed four or more years of college and those who did not was declining before the pandemic. However, during the pandemic, we found that those with less education again became more than twice as likely to experience forced intercourse.

Like all observational studies, these findings are characterized by important limitations. First and foremost, we are able to document trends, but we are not able to document the causes of those trends. This limitation is crucial to the interpretation of the trends because they are likely to reflect multiple different causes. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic coincided with George Floyd’s death, which fueled widespread protests (Black Lives Matter: BLM) related to racial discrimination and social justice in the U.S [32, 33]. In the U.S., race and educational enrollment are strongly associated [34]. It is also possible that the #MeToo movement shaped reporting of these incidents differently for those with higher education. More research is needed to document potential causes of the trends we document here. Second, we do not yet have measures from after the pandemic that could be used to learn more about the breadth and duration of the changes we document here. Clearly, continued monitoring of these trends will be important for evaluating the extent of forced intercourse experiences. Third, although we use three data sources designed to be consistent and each source is characterized by important strengths, each data source is also characterized by limitations. This important topic will be best understood if multiple sources continue to monitor changes over time, maximizing our ability to detect consistent trends across data sources.

Nevertheless, levels of experiencing forced intercourse remain high in the U.S. Nationwide, the high levels of forced intercourse are likely to contribute to continued high levels of unintended pregnancies. Forced intercourse rarely involves effective contraception, increasing the probability of unintended pregnancy [15]. Research on the long-term consequences of unintended pregnancies demonstrates adverse consequences for both the children and their siblings [35,36,37,38]. Thus, public health interventions to reduce forced intercourse have the potential to improve both the health and well-being of survivors and their families.


Overall rates of forced intercourse have remained high in the U.S. throughout the past decade. Forced intercourse is a pervasive issue throughout the U.S. regardless of educational experience. However, nationally-representative measures collected during the pandemic (2020–2022) indicate that lifetime experience of forced intercourse significantly increased among females aged 24–28. Differences by college attainment also increased, with more than 30% of females aged 24–28 who had completed fewer than 4 years of college reporting ever being forced to have intercourse.

Data Availability

This research uses publicly available data from the U.S. National Survey of Family Growth (2011–2017 public releases; and the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics – Transition into Adulthood Supplement (2017 and 2019 wave public releases; Data from the American Family Health Study (AFHS) is being processed for public release (


  1. Please see the AFHS website for more information:

  2. The NSFG 2017–2019 forced intercourse variables are available in a restricted-use dataset that can be accessed through the NCHS Research Data Center. The public can request access to these data in the Standard Application Process (SAP) portal at The time required for this process varies.

  3. Data are publicly available.

  4. Data are publicly available (see and are currently being processed for larger public release. All procedures involving human subjects for the AFHS were approved by the University of Michigan Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences IRB (HUM00167171).

  5. For males from PSID-TAS, only the forced male-female question is asked.



American Family Health Study


Audio-Computer Assisted Self-Interviewing


National Survey of Family Growth


U.S. National Center for Health Statistics


U.S. National Crime Victimization Survey


U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics Transition into Adulthood Supplement


  1. Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2005; 23(25).

  2. Groves RM, Mosher WD, Lepkowski JM, Kirgis NG. Planning and development of the continuous National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat. 2009;1(48):1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet. 2002 Apr;13(9314):1331–6.

  4. Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C. Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: an observational study. The Lancet. 2008 Apr;5(9619):1165–72.

  5. Watts C, Zimmerman C. Violence against women: global scope and magnitude. The Lancet 2002 Apr 6;359(9313):1232–7.

  6. Scott KM, Koenen KC, King A, Petukhova MV, Alonso J, Bromet EJ, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder associated with sexual assault among women in the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Psychol Med. 2018;48(1):155–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedtke KA, Ruggiero KJ, Fitzgerald MM, Zinzow HM, Saunders BE, Resnick HS, et al. A longitudinal investigation of interpersonal violence in relation to mental health and substance use. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Aug;76(4):633–47.

  8. Kilpatrick DG, Veronen LJ, Best CL. Factors predicting psychological distress among rape victims. In: Figley CR, editor. Trauma and its wake. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1985. pp. 113–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosellini A, Street A, Ursano R, Tat Chiu W, Heeringa SG, Monahan J et al. Sexual assault victimization and mental health treatment, suicide attempts, and career outcomes among women in the US Army. American Journal of Public Health. 2017 Mar 21;107(5):e1–8.

  10. Brener ND, McMahon PM, Warren CW, Douglas KA. Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67(2):252–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Axinn WG, West BT, Schroeder H, Banchoff E, Family Dynamics. Pandemic babies: the social organization of daily life, sudden disruptions to social activities, and national evidence of disruption of trends in U.S. fertility behavior [Internet]. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research: Pandemic Babies? The Covid-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Fertility and ; 2021 Dec 13 [cited 2022 May 13]; Virtual. Available from:

  12. Axinn WG, Bardos ME, West BT. General population estimates of the association between college experience and the odds of forced intercourse. Soc Sci Res. 2018;70:131–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott EK, London AS, Myers N. Dangerous dependencies: domestic violence in the Context of Welfare Reform. Gend Soc. 2002;16(6):878–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Armstrong EA, Gleckman-Krut M, Johnson L. Silence, power, and Inequality: an Intersectional Approach to sexual violence. Ann Rev Sociol. 2018;44(1):99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergmann JN, Stockman JK. How does intimate partner violence affect condom and oral contraceptive use in the United States?: a systematic review of the literature. Contraception. 2015;91(6):438–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cantor D, Fisher B, Chibnall S, Townsend R, Lee H, Bruce C et al. Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Westat; 2015. Available from:

  17. Fedina L, Holmes JL, Backes BL. Campus sexual assault: A systematic review of prevalence research from 2000 to 2015. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2016 Feb 22;19(1):76–93.

  18. Krebs CP, Lindquist CH, Warner TD, Fisher BS, Martin SL. College women’s experiences with physically forced, alcohol- or other drug-enabled, and drug-facilitated sexual assault before and since entering college. J Am Coll Health. 2009 May;57(1):639–49.

  19. Lawyer S, Resnick H, Bakanic V, Burkett T, Kilpatrick D. Forcible, drug-facilitated, and incapacitated rape and sexual assault among undergraduate women. J Am Coll Health 2010 Mar 24;58(5):453–60.

  20. Cantor D, Fisher B, Chibnall S, Harps S, Townsend R, Thomas G et al. Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Misconduct [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Westat; 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 6] p. 284. Available from:

  21. Kilpatrick DG, Resnick HS, Ruggiero KJ, Conoscenti LM, McCauley J. Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and Forcible rape: a National Study. National Criminal Justice Reference Service; 2007.

  22. Rennison CM, Addington LA. Violence against college women: a review to identify limitations in defining the problem and inform future research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2014 Jul 1;15(3):159–69.

  23. Sinozich S, Langton L, Rape. and sexual assault victimization among college-age females, 1995–2013 [Internet]. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2014. Report No.: NCJ 248471. Available from:

  24. West BT, Zhang S, Wagner J, Gatward R, Saw H, Axinn WG. Methods for improving participation rates in national self-administered web/mail surveys: Evidence from the United States. Under Second Review.

  25. National Research Council. Estimating the incidence of rape and sexual assault [Internet]. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2014 [cited 2017 Dec 14]. Available from:

  26. Brick JM, Williams D. Explaining rising nonresponse rates in cross-sectional surveys. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2013;645(1):36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. National Center for Health Statistics. National Survey of Family Growth [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Oct 3]. Available from:

  28. PSID-TAS User Guide. Panel study of Income Dynamics, transition into Adulthood supplement 2017: user guide. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2019.

  29. PSID-TAS Documentation. Transition into Adulthood supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, public use dataset. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tourangeau R, Smith TW. Asking sensitive questions. Pub Opin Q. 1996;60(2):275–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. West BT, Couper MP, Axinn W, Wagner J, Gatward R, Saw H et al. Evaluating a web/mail alternative to a national face-to-face survey: initial results from the American Family Health Study (AFHS). Annual Meetings of the American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2022 May 12; Chicago, IL.

  32. Lowery W. Why Minneapolis was the breaking point. The Atlantic [Internet]. 2020 Jun 10; Available from:

  33. Eichstaedt JC, Sherman GT, Giorgi S, Roberts SO, Reynolds ME, Ungar LH et al. The emotional and mental health impact of the murder of George Floyd on the US population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2021 Sep 28;118(39):e2109139118.

  34. Walters PB. Educational Access and the state: historical continuities and discontinuities in racial inequality in American Education. Sociol Educ. 2001;74:35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Axinn WG, Barber JS, Thornton A. The long-term impact of parents’ childbearing decisions on children’s self-esteem. Demography. 1998;35(4):435–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Barber JS, Axinn WG, Thornton A. Unwanted childbearing, health, and mother-child relationships. J Health Soc Behav. 1999;40(3):231–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barber JS, East PL. Home and parenting resources available to siblings depending on their birth intention status. Child Dev. 2009;80(3):921–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Barber JS, East PL. Children’s experiences after the unintended birth of a sibling. Demography. 2011;48(1):101–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Emma Banchoff for her valuable comments on earlier drafts of this paper and Jennifer Mamer and Alison Shereda for research and editorial assistance. Any errors or omissions remain the responsibility of the authors.


The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development (NICHD) for grant P01HD087155 supporting the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics – Transition to Adulthood Supplement, grant R01HD095920 supporting the American Family Health Study, and for a center grant (P2CHD041028) to the University of Michigan Population Studies Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



WA directed all aspects of the data analysis for each of the National Survey of Family Growth, Panel Study of Income Dynamics – Transition to Adulthood Supplement, and the American Family Health Study that are analyzed here. WA also drafted and revised the text. BW is the PI of the American Family Health Study and directed aspects of the National Survey of Family Growth. BW also oversaw all aspects of statistical estimation and wrote portions of the text. HS conducted all statistical analyses reported here and wrote portions of the text.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to William G. Axinn or Brady T. West.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures involving human subjects for the AFHS were approved by the University of Michigan Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences IRB (HUM00167171).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Axinn, W.G., West, B.T. & Schroeder, H.M. Forced intercourse in America: a pandemic update. BMC Public Health 23, 1201 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: