Skip to main content

The effect of informal social support on the health of Chinese older adults: a cross-sectional study



This study aimed to assess the effect of informal social support (ISS) on the health of Chinese older adults, identify channels of the association between the two, and assess the magnitude of this effect in different groups of older adults.


Based on the data from the 2018 China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey (CLASS), we first used both the Quality of Well-Being (QWB) scale and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method to construct the QWB score that can objectively measure the health status of Chinese older adults. Next, we conducted an econometric equation controlling for various high-dimensional fixed effects, estimated the effects using the Tobit model, and used various robustness check strategies and the propensity score matching (PSM) method to ensure reliability and deal with the potential endogeneity, respectively. Finally, we performed staging and grouping regression for mechanism and heterogeneity analysis.


The mean QWB score of Chinese older adults was 0.778. ISS has a significant positive effect on the health of older adults (P < 0.001), and there were similar patterns of findings for the effects of SE (P < 0.001), PSS (P < 0.001), and ES (P < 0.001). Additionally, the health promotion effect is higher in older adults who are male (P < 0.001), under the age of 80 (P < 0.001), with agricultural household registration (P < 0.001), or with high income (P < 0.001) than in the control group.


ISS, including SE, PSS, and ES, had significant promotion effects on the health of older adults, especially on those who are male, under the age of 80, with agricultural household registration, or with high income. Meanwhile, these effects could be reflected through two channels: alleviating loneliness and improving the positive emotional status of older adults.

Peer Review reports


One of the critical issues facing industrialized countries is the global trend of an unprecedented and increasing population aging, which continues to present significant challenges and lead to severe consequences [1, 2]. China, in particular, is experiencing a rapid pace of population aging, more urgent and distinct than other countries like Japan and the United States [3, 4]. The results of the seventh national census from China Statistical Yearbook–2021 show that there are 264.02 million people aged 60 + in China, accounting for 18.70%, an increase of 5.44% points compared with 2010. Projections estimate that by 2030, China will enter a super-aged society, with the share of the population aged 65 + reaching 20% [5]. This indicates that China will be one of the countries in the world with the highest share of older adults [6], and the problems derived from the irreversible population aging trend will burden the whole society [7]. Thus, effectively handling the all-around challenges arising from population aging is a major practical problem that needs systematic solutions.

Older adults, considered a vulnerable group in social life, often face more health risks due to physiological decline and weakened activity ability [8, 9]. The health status of older adults affects their quality of life and the pension burden of the family and society. Improving the overall health level of older adults and exploring their potential human capital positively impacts their life quality, which is of great practical significance for reducing the pension burden and promoting social harmony and stability. To achieve this goal, the Chinese government has conducted institutional exploration and practical work. In November 2021, the CPC Central Committee and the Chinese State Council issued the “Opinions on Strengthening Aging Work in the New Era,” whose measures will further optimize critical institutional systems covering various fields and provide strong social support for promoting the health and development of older adults, which further illustrates that from invisible system construction to actual policy practices, government-led social support has always played a fundamental and persistent role in shaping the overall health status of older adults. However, we should also see the diverse connotations of social support. At least from the perspective of categorization, in addition to formal social support (FSS), such as government-led health services, medical security, and pension security, informal social support (ISS) has been accumulated and acted over the life course of older adults. Specifically, ISS is regarded as an individual’s perception or experience of being cared for and respected by others in social interaction, which shows that ISS, the classic and widely known concept, is distinct from the FSS [10, 11]. In China’s specific social context, whether from reality perception or academic discussion, the role of FSS in promoting the health of older adults has been widely recognized [12,13,14]. However, the role of ISS impacting the health of older adults has still been poorly analyzed in a clear theoretical and empirical way. For the Chinese society that is already in the aging stage and is still accelerating towards the super-aging process, we must not only focus on the utility of the FSS provided by the government but also identify and explore other factors that may promote the health of older adults [15]. Only in this way can we help to form a general and sustainable health maintenance and promotion system, which has certain theoretical inspiration and practical value for reducing the social and individual pension burden and relieving the impact of population aging.

Therefore, this study aims to explore the effect of ISS on the health of the Chinese older adults, hypothesizing that ISS plays a significant role in promoting their health, and can serve as a valuable supplement to government-led FSS. To test this hypothesis, we use data from the 2018 China Longevity Aging Social Survey (CLASS) to measure the current health status of Chinese older adults by constructing a multidimensional index and assess the effect of ISS on their health. Additionally, we conducted the mechanism analysis and heterogeneity analysis to enrich the research content and provide policy recommendations that can help improve the health of older adults and reduce the cost of older care based on empirical results.


Data sources

The data used in this study were derived from the 2018 China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey (CLASS), a nationwide and continuous large-scale social tracking survey project carried out by the China Survey and Data Center of Renmin University of China. CLASS uses stratified multi-stage probability sampling to conduct a multi-dimensional survey in 28 provinces in China, aiming to collect high-quality, nationwide, and representative samples to obtain as much as possible demographic, social, and economic information on Chinese residents aged 60 and above for scientific research. As needed, we deleted missing values and outliers from the original data and obtained 7782 observations (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of sample selection process

Dependent variable: QWB health score

The dependent variable in this study is health status of older adults. To more objectively reflect the health status of older adults and reduce the potential bias caused by subjective perception, based on the questionnaire information in the CLASS database, we refer to the original scale developed by Kaplan et al. [16, 17] and related practices in the existing literature [18], and use the QWB scale as the measure of the health of older adults. The QWB scale is sensitive to changes in disease symptoms and has higher requirements on the design of the questionnaire, which contains four indicators: mobility scale (MOB), physical activity scale (PAC), social activity scale (SAC), and symptom/problem complex (CPX). Furthermore, to avoid the apparent conflict between the weights of the four indicators in the construction of the QWB health score in existing research and the problem that it is out of reality, we attempted to use the AHP method to perform two-stage weighting on the indexes of daily activity (i.e., MOB, PAC, and SAC) and disease symptoms (i.e., CPX), respectively. Hence, combined with the expert consultation method, we have repeatedly solicited and summarized the opinions of clinicians and nurses to assign weights to the measurement items of each indicator, ensuring that the weighting process of the AHP is in line with the actual situation. The QWB score is calculated as follows.


It should be noted that since some older adults may suffer from multiple chronic diseases or activity disorders simultaneously, the QWB health score may be less than 0. The closer the value is to 1, the better the health is, and vice versa (Table 1).

Table 1 AHP weights of QWB scale items based on the CLASS questionnaire

Independent variable: ISS

The multifaceted construct of ISS concepts and the inconsistency of measurement methods can be complex [19, 20]. The unstable reliability and validity of measurement tools have become the endogenous defects in most studies. To promote the consistent use of well-defined terminology across literature reviews and further discussion in this study, we adopt the classical and widely recognized conception presented by Barrera [10]. After carefully evaluating numerous related concepts, Barrera provided a comprehensive and concise description of the connotation and extension of ISS. He posited that ISS refers to the support individuals can experience from the social field, encompassing three elements: social embeddedness (SE), perceived social support (PSS), and enacted support (ES).

SE refers to the frequency, breadth, or depth of contact with individuals within one’s social networks [10, 21, 22]. As a reasonable measurement item in the questionnaire, we selected the question, “How many friends do you meet or contact at least a month?”. PSS pertains to an individual’s need to build trust with others and achieve a cohesive living environment or atmosphere, as well as their expectations and evaluations of social support [10, 23]. Therefore, we chose “How many friends can you safely discuss private matters with?” as a rational and measurable item for PSS. ES differing from SE and PSS, represents individuals’ substantial mobilization and expression in obtaining solid support from social network members, including emotional support, tangible support, or informational support [10, 22, 24]. We selected the question “How many friends are there to help you when you need it?” as a suitable concept operationalization. The more friends respondents reported in the three questions mentioned above, the greater the SE, PSS, and ES they received, and vice versa. Furthermore, we performed a weighted average of SE, PSS, and ES to obtain a comprehensive measure of ISS using the available information.

Control variables

To minimize the impact of estimation bias caused by confounding variables in empirical analysis, we considered and included a series of individual and household variables based on research necessity, data availability, and existing literature [25, 26]. the specific control variables, which encompass common demographic characteristics and socioeconomic status, are as follows: gender, age, years of education, marital status, nature of household registration, pension enrollment, current personal income, activity participation, number of children, and family income, among others. (Table 2).

Table 2 Descriptive statistics of variables (N = 7782)

Empirical strategy

Considering that the values of the explained variables, the QWB score, have prominent right-censored distribution characteristics, if we use the traditional ordinary least squares regression (OLS) model for analysis, there will be a nonnegligible estimated bias in the research results. Hence, we constructed a high-dimensional fixed-effects (FE) econometric equation and performed regression analysis using the Tobit model. The econometric equation is specified as follows.

$$ {QWB}_{i}=\alpha +\beta {ISS}_{i}+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{\delta }_{k}{X}_{ki}+{\phi }_{p}+{\gamma }_{c}+{\tau }_{g}+{\omega }_{f}+{\epsilon }_{i}$$

Where, \( {QWB}_{i}\), the dependent variable, is the health score of older adults measured by the QWB scale for individual \( i\). \( \alpha \) is the constant. \( {ISS}_{i}\) is the core independent variable. \( {X}_{ki}\) is a set of control variables. \( {\phi }_{p}\), \( {\gamma }_{c}\), and \( {\tau }_{g}\) are provincial FE, regional FE, and community FE, respectively, which control for some unobservable external characteristics such as economic status, social security, medical level, and environmental quality that are related to the health of older adults, whereas \( {\omega }_{f}\) is the income FE, which controls occupational factors that may affect the health of older adults (e.g., the original employment mode and labor intensity before retirement). \( {\epsilon }_{i}\) is an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) error term. Data management and analysis were performed using Stata/MP version16.0.


Summary statistics

Table 2 provides the descriptive statistical results of the variables involved in this study. The QWB health score of Chinese older adults is relatively high, with a mean of 0.778. In contrast, the subjective self-reported health status of Chinese older adults is relatively poor, with a mean of only 3.376. The means of ISS, SE, PSS, and ES perceived by respondents were only 2.091, 2.372, 2.021, and 2.022, respectively. From the view of control variables, the average age of the participants was 71.189, of which 50.7% were male, 71.3% had spouses, 48.3% had non-agricultural household registrations, and 79.4% had at least one type of pension. Meanwhile, the mean number of children was 2.525; the shares of older adults who had attended no school, primary school, middle school, high school/technical secondary school, junior college, and university and above were 30.5%, 36.6%, 23.2%, 7.6%, 1.8%, and 0.3%, respectively; the means of participants’ income (log) and family income (log) were 8.200 and 9.575, respectively. In addition, the frequency of respondents participating in activities is relatively high, with a mean of 2.389.

Baseline regression results

In our analysis, we also consider whether multicollinearity exists between the independent variables included in the model, so we conduct a statistical test before estimating the baseline regression model. The test results show that the maximum variance inflation factor (VIF) is 2.92, the minimum VIF is 1.03, and the mean VIF is 1.53, less than the critical value of 10. Hence, we believe there is no need to worry about the potential multicollinearity between variables.

Table 3 reports the estimates of the effect of ISS and its various potential elements on the health of older adults, after adjustment for the evaluated demographic and socioeconomic variables, with coefficients and standard errors, as obtained using the Tobit model. Under the premise of controlling a series of variables, Model 1 also controls the high-dimensional fixed effects of the province, region type, community type, and income mode, of which the estimated results show that ISS has a significant positive effect on the health of older adults (β = 0.034, P < 0.001). Models 2 to 4 included SE (β = 0.024, P < 0.001), PSS (β = 0.026, P < 0.001), and ES (β = 0.026, P < 0.001) as core independent variables, in which the estimated results showed that each had a highly significant positive and similar effect. When SE, PSS, and ES are included in Model 5 simultaneously, it shows that, although the estimated coefficients have decreased, they are all positive, i.e., greater SE (β = 0.013, P < 0.009), PSS (β = 0.006, P = 0.276), and ES (β = 0.015, P < 0.006) for participants were associated with higher QWB scores, but only SE and ES have statistical significance.

Table 3 Baseline regression results

From the view of control variables in Column (1), the signs of all the estimated coefficients conform to the theoretical expectations and reality, which indicated that male participants had higher QWB scores than female participants (β = 0.038, P < 0.001), and participants who had a spouse had higher QWB scores than those who had no spouse (β = 0.032, P < 0.003). As for higher level of education (β = 0.017, P < 0.003) and activity participation (β = 0.061, P < 0.001), they were positively correlated with QWB scores. Additionally, although the estimated coefficients of urban household registration (β = 0.004, P = 0.755), pension enrollment (β = 0.007, P = 0.626), current personal income (β = -0.001, P = 0.855), and family income (β < 0.000, P = 0.958), as well as the number of children (β = -0.002, P = 0.615), conform to the reality in terms of coefficient signs, the associations between them and QWB scores were not statistically significant in Model 1 to Model 5.

Robustness check

To ensure the reliability of the regression results, in this part, we will use three robustness check strategies to re-estimate the baseline regression model established above. First, change the regression model: Considering that the Tobit model is strictly dependent on data distribution and likelihood function and has strict assumptions, if \( {\epsilon }_{i}\) does not follow the normal distribution or does not satisfy the assumption of homoscedasticity, the obtained quasi-maximum likelihood estimation (QMLE) results will be inconsistent. Hence, we use the censored least absolute deviations (CLAD) method with fewer qualifications (only \( {\epsilon }_{i}\) is required to be i.i.d) for regression analysis to avoid this problem. Second, replace the dependent variable: (a) use the 25%, 50%, and 75% quantiles of QWB scores as the cut points, and divide the QWB scores into four different levels from low to high; (b) replace the QWB scores with the respondents’ self-reported health scores; these two help us obtain two new ordinal categorical dependent variables that will be estimated through ordered logit and ordered probit model.

From the regression results, as shown in Table 4, the estimated coefficients of ISS in all columns are positive and statistically significant (P < 0.001), which reconfirms the positive effect of ISS on the health of older adults and indicates the estimated results in this study are robust.

Table 4 Estimated results of robustness check

Endogenous treatment

Although the baseline regression model controls many related demographic and socioeconomic variables and four unobservable heterogeneity factors that do not change over time, there may still be endogeneity problems caused by competing explanations or confounding variables in the research process, which may lead to the bias in regression results. For instance, specific living habits (including diet and exercise) may impact the health status of older adults. However, we have failed to control them effectively due to the lack of corresponding measurement information in the CLASS database. Moreover, whether older adults actively and effectively construct social networks and accumulate social capital in the life course may be affected by individual self-selection behaviors and even the existing social relationships of family members, i.e., the healthier older adults or those with families of higher socioeconomic status may be more conducive to forming interpersonal interactions, communication, and trust from work and life, which in turn can help them obtain much ISS. So, with the help of the propensity score matching (PSM) method, we took the mean of the ISS obtained by older adults as the cut point, set the samples above and below the mean as the treatment (high-ISS) group and the control (low-ISS) group, respectively, and then re-estimated after matching the two groups of samples, which, to some extent, can alleviate the potential endogeneity challenges posed by the problems mentioned above.

Table 5 reports the estimated results using four different matching methods. Regardless of which matching method is used and whether the multiple FEs are controlled or not, ISS has a positive effect on the health of older adults, at least at a 5% significance level, and whose coefficients are very close to the baseline regression results, indicating that, after considering and dealing with potential endogeneity problems, the previous conclusions are still reliable and robust.

Table 5 Estimated results based on PSM regression

Mechanism analysis

So far, we have confirmed the relationship between ISS and the health of older adults. Existing literature demonstrates that ISS may positively influence the health of older adults by reducing feelings of loneliness and improving emotional status, ultimately contributing to better physical health [27,28,29,30]. To examine whether ISS’s effects on the health of older adults operate through these potential channels, we selected the loneliness and emotional status of older adults, which can be measured through two items in the questionnaire (“Have you felt unaccompanied in the past week?” and “Have you felt in a good mood in the past week?”), as mediating variables for conducting a sequential regression analysis.

From the regression results in Table 6, higher ISS (β = -0.081, P < 0.001), SE (β = -0.071, P < 0.001), PSS (β = -0.051, P < 0.024), and ES (β = -0.064, P < 0.002) were related to lower loneliness, whereas higher ISS (β = 0.220, P < 0.001), SE (β = 0.159, P < 0.001), PSS (β = 0.181, P < 0.001), and ES (β = 0.164, P < 0.001) were all associated with a greater positive emotional status. This suggests that ISS and its elements can effectively alleviate loneliness and promote a positive emotional status, thereby improving the health of older adults.

Table 6 Estimated results of mechanism analysis based on Ordered Logit model

Heterogeneity analysis

In our view, the health promotion effect of ISS may be influenced by different demographic and socioeconomic conditions, which are likely to be heterogeneous. To better identify the manifestations of this heterogeneous effect, we divided total samples into different groups by gender, age, household registration, and personal income and conducted grouping regressions in this part.

According to the analysis in Columns (1) and (2) in Table 7, the regression coefficient in the male group (β = 0.036, P < 0.001) is larger than that in the female group (β = 0.032, P < 0.001). The results in Columns (3) and (4) show that, compared with older adults under the age of 80 (β = 0.033, P < 0.001), the promotion effect of ISS on the health of older adults over the age of 80 (β = 0.024, P < 0.163) is not statistically significant. Meanwhile, the effect of ISS on health of the rural older adults (β = 0.035, P < 0.001) is higher than that in the urban group (β = 0.032, P < 0.001), and the effect of ISS on the health of the high-income older adults (β = 0.043, P < 0.001) is stronger than that in the low-income group (β = 0.027, P < 0.001).

Table 7 Estimated results of heterogeneity analysis


This study contributes to the emerging literature concerning the relationship between ISS and the health of Chinese older adults using the latest nationally representative sample from China. Based on CLASS data and combined with the AHP method, we constructed QWB scores that can comprehensively assess the health status of older adults and then used econometric methods to conduct a more standardized, rigorous, and robust analysis of the effect of ISS on the health of older adults, including mechanism analysis and heterogeneity analysis, which allowed us to obtain a series of interesting findings in the end.

To the best of our knowledge, most of the existing literature on the effect of ISS on the health of Chinese older adults does not clearly define the concept of ISS and often regards ISS as the relationship and financial support from family members [31, 32]. Thus, we provided a relatively rational measurement of the ISS and its potential elements, which established a common basis for our discussion. In our analysis, we found that greater ISS, including its potential elements (e.g., SE, PSS, and ES), was associated with the better health of older adults, which is consistent with some findings from previous global literature [33, 34]. Substantial evidence from previous studies has demonstrated that people with loneliness and depression who perceive their ISS as poorer have worse health outcomes concerning symptoms, recovery, and physiological functioning [35]. Moreover, we also considered how the health of older adults evolves with ISS, and our findings demonstrated that it may work through alleviating loneliness and improving emotional status. Specifically, ISS has a significant impact on mood, i.e., lack of ISS is the main reason for loneliness among older adults [36], whereas reducing loneliness can improve their living quality and physical function [37]. Conversely, long-term accumulation of loneliness is more likely to lead to an increased risk of all-cause mortality in older adults [38]. Furthermore, positive emotions help individuals get a higher level of healthy cognition [39] and recover faster from the disease status [40], while negative emotions may induce chronic diseases [41].

Additionally, ISS had different health effects among different groups based on gender, age, household registration, and personal income. Our study points out that ISS for male older adults is more likely to improve their health than for female older adults, similar to Natuya Zhuori’s finding [42]. One potential explanation for this gender difference is that men and women may have different social roles and expectations, which can influence their experiences and perceptions of social support [43]. For example, women often take on caregiving responsibilities within families, which can limit their opportunities to engage in social activities and receive ISS [44]. Additionally, the type and quality of social support received by men and women may differ, with men potentially benefiting more from the support received regarding health outcomes [45]. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying factors contributing to these gender differences in the health effects of ISS. For older adults under the age of 80, the health promotion effect of ISS is statistically significant, whereas ISS does not improve the health of older adults over the age of 80. Due to the weakened physical condition and mobility of the high-aged old [46], the opportunities for participation in social activities and social interactions derived from ISS are correspondingly reduced, and the health promotion effect of ISS cannot be effectively realized. We also found that the health status of older adults in rural areas is more sensitive to ISS than that in urban areas, for which a reasonable explanation may be that, compared with urban areas, interpersonal relationships and interaction, as well as exchanges between individuals, are closer and more frequent in rural areas. Thus, rural older adults are more likely to obtain material support and spiritual connection, which is more conducive to promoting individual health. There were similar but interesting findings for income heterogeneity analysis, i.e., ISS has a more significant health promotion effect on high-income older adults, for which a possible explanation might be that high-income older adults commonly have more abundant social resources [47, 48] and can get more ISS accordingly than low-income older adults.

In addition to the above, other findings from our baseline regression results are worth discussing. Male older adults tend to have healthier physical conditions than their female counterparts. Age is a risk factor for the health of older adults. Older adults with higher educational attainment enjoy better health and longer lifespans than their less-educated peers. This result may be explained by the fact that education can improve the socioeconomic status of older adults, help them acquire extensive medical and healthcare knowledge, encourage them to form good and regular living habits, and ensure and maintain their health [49, 50]. Compared to older adults without a spouse, those with a spouse often receive accompanying care and emotional support from their partner, which helps to improve their health [51]. Additionally, older adults can gain physical exercise and emotional relaxation through participating in activities, enriching their lives and consequently improving their health [52]. In contrast, factors such as household registration, pension enrollment, current personal income, the number of children, and family income do not significantly affect the health of older adults. There are several possible explanations for these intriguing results as follows. Although urban older adults are more likely to enjoy convenient and abundant medical and health services than rural counterparts, the relative health advantages of the former may be weakened by factors such as poor environmental quality and high life pressure. As basic endowment insurance in China has been widely implemented among older adults in 2018 and has reached a high level of coverage, participation in endowment insurance does not significantly improve the health of older adults, which does not partially support some previous research [53]. The coefficient of personal income in regression results is negative and not statistically significant, which may be explained by the fact that we used the current income of older adults as a measure of personal economic status. Specifically, on the one hand, high income in old age is generally at the expense of the high-intensity mental or manual labor in the past, which accelerates the depreciation of health capital to a certain extent and indicates that income has a dual effect on the health of older adults [54]; on the other hand, most of older adults in the rural sample generally have lower incomes, which may lead to general poor health performance in the entire sample. Our study also suggested no absolute and significant association between having more children and better health in older adults, which supports evidence from the previous observation [55]. It showed that the more children, the higher cost of raising and caring for offspring in the early stage of older adults, which may also accelerate the depreciation of their health capital. Due to the changes of the times, traditional family structure and intergenerational relations have undergone profound changes, and there has been a phenomenon of children competing to work outside their hometowns or separating from their families due to jobs [56, 57]. To a certain extent, c this reduces the support and care provided by children to older adults, and older adults may not be able to obtain the corresponding pension returns due to the high efforts required to raise their offspring, which is not conducive to the health of older adults. In the end, the regression coefficient of family income is positive but not statistically significant, indicating, to some extent, that the richer the family’s material and economic resources are, the more helpful it is to improve the health status and quality of life of older adults.

These findings in our study have several practical implications that are closely related to the main results and provide specific recommendations for improving older adults’ health status from the perspective of ISS. At present, old-age security and health promotion for older adults in China primarily rely on the government’s formal system and family support. However, as traditional concepts, including filial piety to parents, are changing and family structures and intergenerational relationships are being impacted by modern development [58], greater responsibility is indirectly transferred to the government. It is essential to recognize that in the era of accelerated aging, the government’s pension burden under the constraints of limited resources is getting heavier [59]. Excessive reliance on public health services and material assistance for older adults will inevitably make it difficult to form a comprehensive, sustainable, and high-quality old-age security model for health promotion. As the study has shown the significant positive effects of ISS on the health of older adults, targeted interventions should be developed to enhance ISS and its potential elements (e.g., SE, PSS, and ES), including emotional, practical, and informational support. Policymakers should recognize the importance of the complementary role of ISS to FSS and prioritize developing community-based programs and services that facilitate heart-to-heart conversations, mutual assistance, and intergenerational engagement. This may include creating more accessible public spaces for seniors, organizing social and recreational activities, and promoting volunteer opportunities for the younger generation to engage with older adults. Given our findings on gender, age, and socioeconomic status differences in the health effects of ISS, tailored strategies should be designed to address the specific needs of different older adult groups. For instance, providing more targeted support for men, those under 80 years old, agricultural household registrants, and high-income individuals, who were found to benefit more from ISS in our study. Programs and policies should also consider the unique challenges faced by women, the oldest old, and low-income individuals in accessing ISS and devise interventions that cater to their specific needs. In summary, by recognizing the complementarity of ISS and FSS, as well as addressing other factors affecting the health of older adults, the government, the community, and society as a whole can work together to effectively improve the life and health of older adults.


The present study was designed to assess the effect of ISS on the health of Chinese elderly, from which the most prominent finding is that ISS, including SE, PSS, and ES, had significant health promotion effects, especially on those who are male, under the age of 80, with agricultural household registration, and with high income. Additionally, our mechanism analysis confirmed that these promotion effects could be reflected through two channels: alleviating loneliness and improving the positive emotional status of older adults. Taken together, these findings suggest a role for government, community, and the whole society in strengthening the supplementary role of ISS to FSS and promoting the effective combination of the two, which, to some extent, will help older adults get health outcomes.

Data Availability

The data used in this study were all available on the CLASS public website (


  1. Li JM, Han XL, Zhang XX, Wang SX. Spatiotemporal evolution of global population ageing from 1960 to 2017. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan;19:15.

  2. Sherman RE, Anderson SA, Dal Pan GJ, Jakovljevic MM. Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us? N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov;375(23):3.

  3. Chen R, Xu P, Song PP, Wang MF, He JJ. China has faster pace than Japan in population aging in next 25 years. Biosci Trends. 2019 Aug;13(4):287–91.

  4. Cheng Y, Gao SY, Li S, Zhang YC, Rosenberg M. Understanding the spatial disparities and vulnerability of population aging in China. Asia Pac Policy Stud. 2019 Jan;6(1):73–89.

  5. Li J, Ji W, Qian WQ. C. The Development Trend of China’s Deep Aging and Demand for Elderly Care Services. Reform. 2022;(02):1–21.

  6. Fang EF, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Jahn HJ, Li J, Ling L, Guo HW, et al. A research agenda for aging in China in the 21st century. Ageing Res Rev. 2015 Nov;24:197–205.

  7. Zhang JK, Zhao RJ. The effect of population aging on pension enforcement: do firms bear the burden? Econ Inq. 2022;60(4):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shilpa A. Ageing Process and Physiological Changes. Gerontology IntechOpen. 2018.

  9. van den Beld AW, Kaufman JM, Zillikens MC, Lamberts SWJ, Egan JM, van der Lely AJ. The physiology of endocrine systems with ageing. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Aug;6(8):647–58.

  10. Barrera M. Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. Am J Community Psychol. 1986 Aug;14(4):413–45.

  11. Taylor SE. Social support: a review. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Feng ZL, Glinskaya E, Chen HT, Gong S, Qiu Y, Xu JM, et al. Long-term care system for older adults in China: policy landscape, challenges, and future prospects. Lancet. 2020 Oct;396(10259):1362–72.

  13. Huang W, Zhang CC. The Power of Social Pensions: Evidence from China’s New Rural Pension Scheme. Am Econ J-Appl Econ. 2021 Apr;13(2):179–205.

  14. Li W, Liu E, Balezentis T, Jin HH, Streimikiene D. Association between socioeconomic welfare and depression among older adults: evidence from the China health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Apr;275:10.

  15. Qian X, Shen H. S, G. The elderly security in informal system arrangement: An analysis of social network. Reform. 2011;(09):137–42.

  16. Kaplan RM, Hays RD. Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Public Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2022;43:355–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaplan RM, Sieber WJ, Ganiats TG. The quality of well-being scale: comparison of the interviewer-administered version with a self-administered questionnaire. Psychol Health. 1997;12(6):783–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. He Q, Ji XD. The Labor Productivity Consequences of exposure to particulate matters: evidence from a Chinese National Panel Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec;18(23):22.

  19. Kocalevent RD, Berg L, Beutel ME, Hinz A, Zenger M, Härter M, et al. Social support in the general population: standardization of the Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3). BMC Psychol. 2018 Jul;17(1):31.

  20. Schwarzer R, Knoll N. Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: a theoretical and empirical overview. Int J Psychol. 2007 Aug;42(4):243–52.

  21. Momtaz YA, Haron HA, Ibrahim R, Hamid TA. Social embeddedness as a mechanism for linking social cohesion to well-being among older adults: moderating effect of gender. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:863–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Siedlecki KL, Salthouse TA, Oishi S, Jeswani S. The relationship between Social Support and Subjective Well-Being Across Age. Soc Indic Res. 2014 Jun;117(2):561–76.

  23. Xiong M, Xiao L, Ye YD. Relative deprivation and prosocial tendencies in chinese migrant children: testing an Integrated Model of Perceived Social Support and Group Identity. Front Psychol. 2021 Jun;12:12.

  24. Krause N. Longitudinal study of social support and meaning in life. Psychol Aging 2007 Sep;22(3):456–69.

  25. Liu EP, Feng Y, Yue Z, Zhang QL, Han TK. Differences in the health behaviors of elderly individuals and influencing factors: evidence from the chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Oct-Dec;34(4):E1520–32.

  26. Zheng ER, Xu J, Xu J, Zeng XY, Tan WJ, Li JM, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life and its influencing factors for Elderly patients with hypertension: evidence from Heilongjiang Province, China. Front Public Health. 2021 Mar;9:8.

  27. Cornwell EY, Waite LJ. Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and Health among older adults. J Health Soc Behav. 2009 Mar;50(1):31–48.

  28. Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of Consequences and Mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2010 Oct;40(2):218–27.

  29. Santini ZI, Jose PE, Cornwell EY, Koyanagi A, Nielsen L, Hinrichsen C, et al. Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and symptoms of depression and anxiety among older Americans (NSHAP): a longitudinal mediation analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jan;5(1):E62–E70.

  30. Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr;110(15):5797–801.

  31. Bai YL, Bian F, Zhang LX, Cao YM. The impact of Social Support on the Health of the Rural Elderly in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar;17(6):18.

  32. Tang DS, Wang XY, Liu YH, Bu T. The impact of Informal Social Support on Older Health: evidence from China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb;19(4):14.

  33. Freak-Poli R, Ryan J, Tran T, Owen A, Power JM, Berk M, et al. Social isolation, social support and loneliness as independent concepts, and their relationship with health-related quality of life among older women. Aging Ment Health. 2022 Jul;26(7):1335–44.

  34. Kim J, Lee JE. Social Support and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Elderly Individuals Living Alone in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Nurs Res 2018 Oct;26(5):316–23.

  35. Wang JY, Mann F, Lloyd-Evans B, Ma RM, Johnson S. Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May;18:16.

  36. Yeh SCJ, Lo SK. Living alone, social support, and feeling lonely among the elderly. Soc Behav Pers. 2004;32(2):129–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shankar A, McMunn A, Demakakos P, Hamer M, Steptoe A. Social isolation and loneliness: prospective Associations with Functional Status in older adults. Health Psychol. 2017 Feb;36(2):179–87.

  38. O’Suilleabhain PS, Gallagher S, Steptoe A, Loneliness. Living alone, and all-cause mortality: the role of emotional and social loneliness in the Elderly during 19 years of Follow-Up. Psychosom Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;81(6):521–6.

  39. Uchino BN, Rook KS. Emotions, relationships, health and illness into old age. Maturitas. 2020 Sep;139:42–8.

  40. de Ridder D, Geenen R, Kuijer R, van Middendorp H. Psychological adjustment to chronic disease. Lancet. 2008 Jul;372(9634):246–55.

  41. Suls J, Bunde J. Anger, anxiety, and depression as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the problems and implications of overlapping affective dispositions. Psychol Bull. 2005 Mar;131(2):260–300.

  42. Zhuori N, Cai Y, Yan Y, Cui Y, Zhao M. Does Social Support Affect the Health of the Elderly in Rural China? A Meta-Analysis Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(18).

  43. Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and Mental Health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011 Jun;52(2):145–61.

  44. Pinquart M, Sorensen S. Gender differences in caregiver stressors, social resources, and health: an updated meta-analysis. J Gerontol Ser B-Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 Jan;61(1):P33–P45.

  45. Uchino BN. Understanding the Links between Social Support and Physical Health: a life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of Perceived and received support. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 May;4(3):236–55.

  46. Sharma PK, Reddy BM, Ganguly E. Frailty Syndrome among oldest old Individuals, aged ≥ 80 years: Prevalence & Correlates. Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls. 2020 Dec;5(4):92–101.

  47. Fekete C, Reinhardt JD, Arora M, Patrick Engkasan J, Gross-Hemmi M, Kyriakides A, et al. Socioeconomic status and social relationships in persons with spinal cord injury from 22 countries: does the countries’ socioeconomic development moderate associations? PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0255448.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Paarlberg LE, Hoyman M, McCall J, Heterogeneity. Income inequality, and Social Capital: a New Perspective. Soc Sci Q. 2018 Jun;99(2):699–710.

  49. Galama TJ, Lleras-Muney A, van Kippersluis H. The Effect of Education on Health and Mortality: A Review of Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Evidence. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. 2018;No. 24225.

  50. Raghupathi V, Raghupathi W. The influence of education on health: an empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995–2015. Arch PUblic Health. 2020 Apr;78(1):18.

  51. Liu H, Zhang Y, Burgard SA, Needham BL. Marital status and cognitive impairment in the United States: evidence from the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;38:28–34.

  52. Musich S, Wang SHS, Hawkins K, Greame C. The frequency and health benefits of physical activity for older adults. Popul Health Manag. 2017 Jun;20(3):199–207.

  53. Pan G, Li S, Geng Z, Zhan K. Do Social Pension Schemes promote the Mental Health of Rural Middle-Aged and old residents? Evidence from China. Front public health. 2021;9:710128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Ding J, Dong H. X, D. The role of children on the health of the elderly and the comparison between China′s urban and rural areas: based on the empirical study of CHNS data. Nankai Economic Studies. 2017;(05):60–76.

  55. Lu S, Wu YP, Mao ZF, Liang XH. Association of formal and Informal Social Support with Health-Related Quality of Life among Chinese Rural Elders. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb;17(4):14.

  56. Cheng Y, Xi J, Rosenberg MW, Gao SY. Intergenerational differences in social support for the community-living elderly in Beijing, China. Health Sci Rep. 2018 Nov;1(11):10.

  57. Shou J, Du ZH, Wang HT, Ren LM, Liu Y, Zhu SZ. Quality of life and its contributing factors in an elderly community-dwelling population in Shanghai, China. Psychogeriatrics. 2018 Mar;18(2):89–97.

  58. Liu HJ, Feng ZX, Jiang QB, Feldman MW. Family structure and competing demands from aging parents and adult children among middle-aged people in China. J Fam Issues. 2020 Feb;41(2):235–61.

  59. Chen X, Zhong S, Qi T. Delaying Retirement and China’s pension payment dilemma: based on a General Analysis Framework. IEEE Access. 2020;8:126559–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We sincerely thank the China Survey and Data Center of Renmin University of China for data support. We also thank the experts of the Academic Forum for Doctoral Students at Fudan University for their insightful comments.


This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grant number OOP1148464, OPP1199760).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



CY, CJ, SY, ZM, and D.C. conceived of and designed the study. CY acquired the data. CY and DC conducted the data analysis. CY and SY searched the literature. CY and DC interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. CY, CJ, SY, ZM, and DC reviewed and edited. DC and ZM obtained the funding. DC supervised this study. All authors critically revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Cui.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics committee approval was not required for this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, C., Jia, C., Yin, S. et al. The effect of informal social support on the health of Chinese older adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 23, 1017 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Informal social support
  • The health of chinese older adults
  • The quality of well-being scale (QWB)
  • Cross-sectional study
  • Econometric methods
  • Mechanism
  • Heterogeneity