Skip to main content
Download PDF

A U-shaped protection of altitude against mortality and infection of COVID-19 in Peru: an ecological study

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 1054 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the world in multiple ways and has been a challenge for the health systems of each country. From the beginning, risk factors for the severity and mortality of the disease were considered, as the spread of the virus was related to the living conditions of each population.

Methods

In this ecological study we have evaluated the role of geography, precisely the altitude above sea level in the incidence and mortality of COVID-19 in Peru. Incidence and mortality data were taken from the open-access database of the government of Peru until March 2021. COVID-19 cases and COVID-19 mortality were treated as cases/density population and 1000 x cases/inhabitants while altitude was treated as continuous and as a categorical variable divided in 7 categories. The relationship between COVID-19 cases or deaths for COVID-19 and altitude as continuous variable was determined using Spearman correlation test. Meanwhile when altitude was considered as a categorical variable, Poisson regression or negative binomial analyses were applied.

Results

A significant inverse correlation was found between COVID-19 cases by population density and altitude (r=-0.37 p < 0.001). By altitude categories, the lowest risk for infection was observed between 3,000 and 3,500 m (IRR 0.08; 95% CI 0.05,0.12). Moreover, we found an inverse correlation between altitude and COVID-19 mortality (r=-0.39 p < 0.001). Also, the lowest risk for mortality was observed between 3,000 and 3,500 m (IRR 0.12; 95%CI 0.08; 0.18). Similar results were found when analyses were adjusted for inhabitants and stratified by sex.

Conclusion

This study reports an inverse relationship between COVID-19 incidence and mortality with respect to the altitude of residence, particularly, a u-shaped protection is shown, with a highest benefit between 3000 and 3500 m. The possibility of using hypoxia as an alternative treatment requires more complex studies that should allow knowing the physiological and environmental mechanisms of the protective role.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 started in December 2019 in China and spread to 195 countries affecting more than 670 million people and causing more than 6.8 million deaths [1]. The incidence and mortality among different countries varied due to a complex interaction between factors [2], some related to the particularity of each country such as geography, population density, altitude levels, humidity and temperature [3], others related to the population [4] such as migration [5, 6], socioeconomic status [7], health status and presence of comorbidities; as well as the public policies use [6, 8]. In addition to conditions related to the precision of the data such as the amount and type of diagnostic tests used, the report of cases to the coordinating institution and in relation with mortality, the capacity of health attention for each place. In most countries an underestimation of mortality has been observed [9]. Real data on mortality placed Peru as one of the countries with the highest number of deaths per million inhabitants [1].

Since the beginning of the pandemic, obesity is known to be the main modifiable factor in relation to the severity of infection and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 [10]. This would be due to the chronic low-grade inflammatory condition associated with the dysfunctional accumulation of adipose tissue [11]. Similarly, people with diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and other chronic conditions were more susceptible to develop a severe clinical case due to the infection [12]. On the other hand, there is evidence on the beneficial effect of altitude hypobaric hypoxia against these metabolic related pathologies [11, 13,14,15,16,17].

Oxygen is essential for life and evolutionarily mechanisms have been developed to maintain cellular homeostasis of this molecule. The main regulator of oxygen delivery and utilization is the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), and the activity of prolyl hydroxylases 1,2 and 3 (PHDs). The HIF-1 activity modulates the expression of hundreds of gene products in response to hypoxia or ischemia [18, 19]. In this sense, hypoxia inhibits the expression of ACE2, a receptor of SARS-CoV-2, that has been related to a lower incidence and severity of the infection [20,21,22]. For this reason, a possible protective role of hypoxia could be considered against the COVID-19 incidence and mortality. In any case, the link with high-altitude hypoxia is still under investigation.

Peru is a country with a very particular geography with populated areas at low altitudes (coast and jungle) but also a significant number of medium and large cities located at high altitudes > 1500 meters above sea level (m), which makes it ideal for studying natural conditions of hypobaric hypoxia. Several studies carried out from the beginning of the pandemic observed a protective role of altitude on COVID-19 infection [23, 24] and an improvement in survival amongst people admitted to the intensive care unit [25]. However, a small study (n = 159) carried out at La Rinconada, in southern Peru at 5300 m (the highest-altitude city in the world) fail to confirm this observation [26].

Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the COVID-19 incidence and mortality according to the altitude level of residence and to find optimal levels of altitude as a protective factor.

Methods

Study design

The present study is an ecological study based on data derived from open-access databases managed by the Ministry of Health from Peru. We collected the number of COVID-19 cases from the https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/casos-positivos-por-covid-19-ministerio-de-salud and deaths from https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/fallecidos-por-covid-19-ministerio-de-salud-minsa which was obtained until march 2021. These data were selected up to this timeframe because large-scale vaccination began in Peru in April 2021, which may have subsequently influenced findings.

For the data of positive cases, it is the daily record of positive cases of COVID-19 confirmed with any type of test and that present symptoms. Each record is equal to one person, which can be characterized by gender, age, and geographic location down to the district level [27].

For the mortality data, according to the Ministry of Health of Peru, each record is equal to a person, which can be characterized by sex, age, and geographic location up to the district level [28]. Since this dataset was published, each record represented a deceased confirmed by COVID-19, who met at least one of the following seven technical criteria:

Virological criterion: Death in a confirmed case of COVID-19 who dies within 60 days after a molecular (PCR) or reactive antigen test for SARS-CoV-2. Serological criterion: Death in a confirmed case of COVID-19 who dies within 60 days after a positive IgM or IgM/IgG serological test for SARS-CoV-2. Radiological criterion: Death in a probable case of COVID-19 that presents a radiological, tomographic or nuclear magnetic resonance image compatible with COVID-19 pneumonia. Epidemiological link criterion: Death in a probable case of COVID-19 that has an epidemiological link with a confirmed case of COVID-19. Epidemiological investigation criteria: Death in a suspected case of COVID-19 that is verified by epidemiological investigation of the National Epidemiology Network (RENACE). Clinical criteria: Death in a suspected case of COVID-19 with a clinical picture compatible with the disease. SINADEF criteria: Death with death certificate in which the diagnosis of COVID-19 is presented as the cause of death. Death due to COVID-19 on the death certificate is defined by the presence in fields A, B, C or D of the ICD-10 codes: U071, U072, B342, B972, or the mention of the terms “coronavirus”, “cov-2”, “cov2”, “covid” and “sars”.

Measures

The COVID-19 cases and mortality database included a total of 196 provinces and the altitude ranged from 5 m (Talara, Zorritos) to 4342 m (Cerro de Pasco) of altitude (Supplementary Table 1).

The dependent variables were COVID-19 cases and COVID-19 mortality. Both measures were treated as cases/density population for the main analyses and 1000 x cases/inhabitants for the secondary analyses. The independent variable was altitude and was treated as continuous and as a categorical variable divided in 7 categories: <1500 m, 1500-1999 m, 2000-2499 m, 2500-2999 m, 3000-3499 m, 3500-3999 m, and ≥ 4000 m.

Population data, population density, and altitude of capital of provinces by provinces in Peru were collected from the Centro Nacional de Planeamiento Estratégico (CEPLAN) which was updated in December 2017 [29].

Statistical analysis

The relationship between COVID-19 cases or deaths for COVID-19 and altitude, as continuous variable, was determined using Spearman correlation test. Meanwhile when altitude was considered as a categorical variable, Poisson regression or negative binomial regression analyses were applied according to the residual analysis of the Poisson regression, which was performed using the goodness of fit test and also plotting Pearson residuals and deviance residuals vs. the fitted values (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). The analyses by 1000 x cases/inhabitants were conducted by total population and stratified by sex. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 16, and a P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

By March 2021, a total of 1,583,371 COVID-19 positive cases were recorded. For analysis, a total of 82,635 subjects without information of province were excluded. Therefore, the final number of cases was 1,500,736. Of them 51.1% were male and 48.9% female. The mean age of individuals was 42.3 (SD 17.8) years.

We have found that the number of positive cases for COVID-19 depends on altitude of residence. A significant inverse correlation was found between COVID-19 cases by population density and altitude (r=-0.37 p < 0.001) (Fig. 1). A stronger correlation was found by 1000 x COVID-19 cases/inhabitants (r=-0.53 p < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 3A). Once the population was stratified by sex, the same pattern was observed (Supplementary Fig. 3B and 3 C).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Association between COVID-19 cases by density population in Peru in relation to altitude (m)

Full size image

Figure 2 shows the risk of COVID-19 across 7 altitude categories (< 1500 m, from 1500 to 4000 m every 500 m, and ≥ 4000 m) obtained from negative binomial regression analysis. The highest altitude vs. lowest shows the risk of COVID-19 by density population (IRR< 1500 m vs. ≥4000m0.24; 95% CI 0.07,0.08; p trend < 0.001). In this sense, the biggest protective effect of altitude against COVID-19 was found in the 3000-3500 m category (IRR< 1500 m vs. ≥3000−3500 m 0.08; 95% CI 0.05,0.12). Analyses by 1000 x COVID-19 cases/inhabitants showed similar results in the overall population and by sex (Supplemental Fig. 4). The analyses on the incidence were carried out with the frequently used altitude categories [30] showing the same tendency (Supplementary Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Negative binomial regression analyses of COVID-19 cases by density in Peru in relation to altitude (m). IRR, Incidence-rate ratio; 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval

Full size image

The total number of deaths across all provinces of Peru, by March 2021, was 50,831. A total of n = 238 subjects did not have information of province listed, therefore the final total number of deaths was 50,593. Similar to the results for COVID-19 cases, we found an inverse correlation between altitude and deaths by COVID-19 by density population (r=-0.39, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Additional analyses by 1000 x COVID-19 mortality/inhabitants and stratified by sex did not change the results (Supplementary Fig. 5).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Association between COVID-19 mortality by density population in Peru in relation to altitude (m)

Full size image

According to the negative binomial regression analysis, the risk of death was lower at higher altitudes (IRR< 1500 m vs. ≥4000 m 0.31; 95% CI 0.10,0.99; p trend < 0.001) (Fig. 4). The biggest protective effect of altitude against COVID-19 mortality risk was found in the 3000-3500 m category (IRR< 1500 m vs. ≥3000−3500 m 0.12; 95%CI 0.08;0.18). Similar results were found when the mortality was adjusted by inhabitants and population was stratified by sex (Supplementary Fig. 6). The analyses with the frequently used altitude categories [30] were carried out, showing the same tendency on mortality (Supplementary Table 3).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Negative regression analyses of COVID-19 mortality by density population in Peru in relation to altitude (m). IRR, Incidence-rate ratio; 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval

Full size image

Discussion

In this ecological study, the most relevant finding was the protective role of altitude against the incidence and mortality from COVID-19, especially between 3000 and 3500 m. This finding is relevant because a significant number of people (500 million) live at more than 1500 m [31], and physiological adaptations to chronic exposure and its effect on mortality is constantly being studied [32]. In this sense, shortly after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the first reports were presented on the possible protective role of residence at high altitudes [33]. In addition, from the beginning of the pandemic, various strategies were used to reduce contagion, the main one was to reduce social contact; thus, it was necessary to include population density in the analyses due to its role in the spread of the virus [34] as well as the difference by sex. Despite the restrictions, initially there was a great migration from the capital to the interior of the country, which could be a factor in the rapid spread of the virus [24].

Our results are in accordance with other studies carried out worldwide [21, 23, 24, 35,36,37,38,39], also, this issue has been addressed on diverse populations with multicenter studies [40] and have even considered the geographic spread of the virus [24]. The opposite results to initial studies [40] may be attributed to the use of only three altitude categories (less than 1,500, 1,500-1,900 and more than 2,000 m) in addition to the lack of adjustment for population density.

This protection can be explained by physiological and anatomical adaptations to chronic exposure to lower partial pressure of oxygen, typical of high altitudes, as the better response to inflammation mediated by a better regulation of IL-6 and nitric oxide [41] better pulmonary perfusion and capacity [42] lower expression of ACE2 [20], and the increased of EPO [43]. Although previous studies have shown that patients with COVID-19 residing in high-altitude tend to have higher levels of inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α [44]. However, other conditions typical of high altitude, such as radiation and air humidity, must also be considered as variables of the protective role [37]. A study conducted in Ecuador did not find a lower viral load related to altitude perhaps because they did not consider the time of development of the disease or the peak of the viral load, the state of the immune system or the use of medication that can reduce the viral load [45].

Another important finding is that protection against COVID-19 begins to decrease from 3500 m. This could be due to the higher incidence of chronic mountain illness, which includes arterial hypoxemia, blood hyperviscosity and thrombosis, factors associated with higher morbidity and mortality [46, 47]. These pathological conditions also have been related with a poorer prognosis of COVID-19 [48, 49].

Strength and limitations

In contrast to previous studies, we use the official open database, which reduced the underestimation of incidence and mortality, analyzing the 196 provinces in Peru, considering the altitude of the capital. Moreover, we censured the database until the start of the vaccination, March 2021. Also, there are limitations associated with our study. The prevalence of non-communicable diseases was not considered for correction or the age of the population. Another important limitation inherent to the ecological studies includes lack of access to smaller unit-sized data and individual data such BMI or abdominal perimeter, considering that chronic inflammation due to excessive accumulation of adipose tissue is one of the best identified risk factors for severity of disease, it is a possible confounding variable. However, the spread of the virus is also related to their own living conditions, socioeconomic status, compliance with the rules of confinement and social isolation, basic sanitary conditions and, of course, migration. Finally, the care capacity in hospitals or health centers at the provincial or departmental level was not considered either because the data is not available.

Conclusion

An inverse relationship was found between COVID-19 incidence or mortality and the altitude of residence, when considering the latter as a continuous variable, this finding is supported by other similar studies. In our opinion, the most differential finding seems to be a u-shaped protection, showing that the altitude between 3000 and 3500 m is the optimal range against COVID-19 incidence and mortality. The possibility of using hypoxia as an alternative treatment requires more complex studies that allow knowing the physiological and environmental mechanisms of the protective role.

Data availability

All data about of number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in Peru is available in the official web of government of Peru: https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/casos-positivos-por-covid-19-ministerio-de-salud-minsa. Geographical population and altitude data for each city are available in the official web of government of Peru: https://www.ceplan.gob.pe/informacion-sobre-zonas-y-departamentos-del-peru/. The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. In any case the databases that we use are public.

References

  1. Johns Hopkins University. COVID-19 map. Coronavirus Resource Center. 2023. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed 8 Mar 2023

  2. Cho J-H, Kim D-K, Kim E-J. Multi-scale causality analysis between COVID-19 cases and mobility level using ensemble empirical mode decomposition and causal decomposition. Phys A. 2022;600:127488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu X, Huang J, Li C, Zhao Y, Wang D, Huang Z, et al. The role of seasonality in the spread of COVID-19 pandemic. Environ Res. 2021;195:110874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang VS, Sutermaster S, Caplan Y, Kemp H, Schmutz D, Sgaier SK. Social distancing across vulnerability, race, politics, and employment: how different Americans changed behaviors before and after major COVID-19 policy announcements. medRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.04.20119131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lau H, Khosrawipour V, Kocbach P, Mikolajczyk A, Ichii H, Zacharski M, et al. The association between international and domestic air traffic and the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020;53(3):467–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu S, Xiong C, Yang M, Younes H, Luo W, Zhang L. A big-data driven approach to analyzing and modeling human mobility trend under non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19 pandemic. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2021;124:102955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102955.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cajachagua-Torres KN, Quezada-Pinedo HG, Huayanay-Espinoza CA, et al. COVID-19 and drivers of excess death rate in Peru: a longitudinal ecological study. Heliyon. 2022;8(12):e11948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11948.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ioannidis JPA. Over- and under-estimation of COVID-19 deaths. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021;36(6):581–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00787-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. da Silva RA, de Souza Ferreira LP, Leite JMRS, Tiraboshi FA, Valente TM, de Paiva Roda VM, Duarte Sanchez JJ. Statistical modeling of deaths from COVID-19 influenced by social isolation in Latin American Countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022;106(5):1486–90. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.21-0217. Advance online publication.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Aghili SMM, Ebrahimpur M, Arjmand B, Shadman Z, Pejman Sani M, Qorbani M, et al. Obesity in COVID-19 era, implications for mechanisms, comorbidities, and prognosis: a review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021;45(5):998–1016. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00776-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. González-Muniesa P, Mártinez-González M-A, Hu FB, Després J-P, Matsuzawa Y, Loos RJF, et al. Obes Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3(1):17034. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nikoloski Z, Alqunaibet AM, Alfawaz RA, Almudarra SS, Herbst CH, El-Saharty S, et al. Covid-19 and non-communicable diseases: evidence from a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1068. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11116-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Woolcott OO, Gutierrez C, Castillo OA, Elashoff RM, Stefanovski D, Bergman RN. Inverse association between altitude and obesity: a prevalence study among Andean and low-altitude adult individuals of Peru. Obes (Silver Spring). 2016;24(4):929–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moldobaeva MS, Vinogradova AV, Esenamanova MK. Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus development in the native population of low- and high-altitude regions of Kyrgyzstan: finnish diabetes risc score questionnaire results. High Alt Med Biol. 2017;18(4):428–35. https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2017.0036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lopez-Pascual A, Bes-Rastrollo M, Sayón-Orea C, Perez-Cornago A, Díaz-Gutiérrez J, Pons JJ, et al. Living at a geographically higher elevation is associated with lower risk of metabolic syndrome: prospective analysis of the SUN cohort. Front Physiol. 2017;7:658. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00658.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lopez-Pascual A, Arévalo J, Martínez JA, González-Muniesa P. Inverse association between metabolic syndrome and altitude: a cross-sectional study in an adult population of Ecuador. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00658.

  17. Lopez-Pascual A, Trayhurn P, Martínez JA, González-Muniesa P. Oxygen in metabolic dysfunction and its therapeutic relevance. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021;35(8):642–87. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2019.7901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and cardiovascular disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2014;76(1):39–56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abassi Z, Higazi AAR, Kinaneh S, Armaly Z, Skorecki K, Heyman SN. ACE2, COVID-19 infection, inflammation, and coagulopathy: missing pieces in the puzzle. Front Physiol. 2020;11:574753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.574753.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Afsar B, Kanbay M, Afsar RE. Hypoxia inducible factor-1 protects against COVID-19: a hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 2020;143:109857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Arias-Reyes C, Carvajal-Rodriguez F, Poma-Machicao L, Aliaga-Raduán F, Marques DA, Zubieta-DeUrioste N, et al. Decreased incidence, virus transmission capacity, and severity of COVID-19 at altitude on the american continent. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0237294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pun M, Turner R, Strapazzon G, Brugger H, Swenson ER. Lower incidence of COVID-19 at high altitude: facts and confounders. High Alt Med Biol. 2020;21(3):217–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2020.0114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Accinelli RA, Leon-Abarca JA. En la altura la COVID-19 es menos frecuente: la experiencia del Perú. Arch Bronconeumol. 2020;56(11):760–1. https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2021.0070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Thomson TM, Casas F, Guerrero HA, Figueroa-Mujíca R, Villafuerte FC, MacHicado C. Potential protective effect from COVID-19 conferred by altitude: a longitudinal analysis in Peru during full lockdown. High Alt Med Biol. 2021;22(2):209–24. https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2020.0202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Simbaña-Rivera K, Jaramillo PRM, Silva JVV, Go´mez-Barreno L, Campoverde ABV, Novillo Cevallos JF, et al. High-altitude is associated with better short-term survival in critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0262423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Champigneulle B, Hancco I, Renan R, Doutreleau S, Stauffer E, Pichon A, et al. High-altitude environment and COVID-19: SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in the highest city in the world. High Alt Med Biol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2021.0020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. MINSA. Casos positivos por COVID-19. Plataforma Nacional de Datos Abiertos. 2021. https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/casos-positivos-por-covid-19-ministerio-de-salud-minsa. Accessed 2022.

  28. MINSA. Fallecidos por COVID-19. Plataforma Nacional de Datos Abiertos. 2021. https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/fallecidos-por-covid-19-ministerio-de-salud-minsa. Accessed 2022.

  29. Centro Nacional de Planteamiento Estratégico. Información para el planeamiento a nivel departamental, provincial y distrital. CEPLAN. 2017. https://www.ceplan.gob.pe/informacion-sobre-zonas-y-departamentos-del-peru/. Accessed 2022.

  30. Imray C, Booth A, Wright A, Bradwell A. Acute altitude illnesses. BMJ. 2011;343:d4943. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4943. Published 2011 Aug 15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tremblay JC, Ainslie PN. Global and country-level estimates of human population at high altitude. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(18):e2102463118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102463118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Burtscher M. Effects of living at higher altitudes on mortality: a narrative review. Aging Dis. 2014;5(4):274–80. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2014.0500274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Millet GP, Debevec T, Brocherie F, Burtscher M, Burtscher J. Altitude and COVID-19: friend or foe? A narrative review. Physiol Rep. 2021;8(24):e14615. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rocklöv J, Sjödin H. High population densities catalyse the spread of COVID-19. J Travel Med. 2021;27(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa038.

  35. Segovia-Juarez J, Castagnetto JM, Gonzales GF. High altitude reduces infection rate of COVID-19 but not case-fatality rate. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020;281:103494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2020.103494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Intimayta-Escalante C, Rojas-Bolivar D, Hancco I. Letter to the editor: influence of altitude on the prevalence and case fatality rate of COVID-19 in Peru. High Alt Med Biol. 2020;21(4):426–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2020.0133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Arias-Reyes C, Zubieta-DeUrioste N, Poma-Machicao L, Aliaga-Raduan F, Carvajal-Rodriguez F, Dutschmann M, et al. Does the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 virus decrease at high-altitude? Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020;277(103443):103443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2020.103443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cano-Perez E, Torres-Pacheco J, Fragozo-Ramos MC, Garcia-Diaz G, Montalvo-Varela E, Pozo-Palacios JC. Negative correlation between altitude and COVID-19 pandemic in Colombia: a preliminary report. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(6):2347–9. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-1027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ortiz-Prado E, Fernandez Naranjo RP, Vasconez E, Simbaña-Rivera K, Correa-Sancho T, Lister A, et al. Analysis of excess mortality data at different altitudes during the COVID-19 outbreak in Ecuador. High Alt Med Biol. 2021;22(4):406–16. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-1027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Woolcott OO, Bergman RN. Mortality attributed to COVID-19 in high-altitude populations. High Alt Med Biol. 2020;21(4):409–16. https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2020.0098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pham K, Parikh K, Heinrich EC. Hypoxia and inflammation: insights from high-altitude physiology. Front Physiol. 2021;12:676782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.676782.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Tashi T, Feng T, Koul P, Amaru R, Hussey D, Lorenzo FR, et al. High altitude genetic adaptation in Tibetans: no role of increased hemoglobin-oxygen affinity. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2014;53(1–2):27–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2014.02.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Soliz J, Schneider-Gasser EM, Arias-Reyes C, Aliaga-Raduan F, Poma-Machicao L, Zubieta-Calleja G, et al. Coping with hypoxemia: could erythropoietin (EPO) be an adjuvant treatment of COVID-19? Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020;279:103476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2020.103476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. del Valle-Mendoza J, Tarazona-Castro Y, Merino-Luna A, Carrillo-Ng H, Kym S, Aguilar-Luis MA, et al. Comparison of cytokines levels among COVID-19 patients living at sea level and high altitude. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07079-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ortiz-Prado E, Fernandez-Naranjo R, Vásconez JE, et al. A comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 viral load across different altitudes. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):17179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20516-w. Published 2022 Oct 13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. León-Velarde F, Maggiorini M, Reeves JT, Aldashev A, Asmus I, Bernardi L, et al. Consensus statement on chronic and subacute high altitude diseases. High Alt Med Biol. 2005;6(2):147–57. https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2005.6.147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Swenson ER. Chronic mountain sickness evolving over time: New data from on high. Chest. 2022;161(5):1136–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Vahdat S. A review of pathophysiological mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of thrombosis risk associated with COVID-19 infection. IJC Hear Vasc. 2022;4:101068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Agarwal G, Hajra A, Chakraborty S, Patel N, Biswas S, Adler MK, et al. Predictors and mortality risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;16:17539447221105012. https://doi.org/10.1177/17539447221105013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Dr. Christopher Curtis for his revision and proofreading of the language.

Funding

P.G-M received funding from CIBERobn CB12/03/30002 (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), Spain. The other authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Peru

    L. Baquerizo-Sedano

  2. Faculty of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

    L. Baquerizo-Sedano & P. González-Muniesa

  3. Center for Nutrition Research, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

    L. Baquerizo-Sedano & P. González-Muniesa

  4. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

    L. Goni & C. Sayón-Orea

  5. IDISNA – Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain

    L. Goni, C. Sayón-Orea & P. González-Muniesa

  6. CIBER Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBERobn), Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain

    L. Goni, C. Sayón-Orea & P. González-Muniesa

  7. Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain

    C. Sayón-Orea

Authors
  1. L. Baquerizo-Sedano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Goni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Sayón-Orea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. González-Muniesa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.B-S and P.G-M contributed to the study conception. All authors contributed to the design of the study. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by L.B-S, L.G and C.S-O. The first draft of the manuscript was written by L.B-S, L.G and P.G-M, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. González-Muniesa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baquerizo-Sedano, L., Goni, L., Sayón-Orea, C. et al. A U-shaped protection of altitude against mortality and infection of COVID-19 in Peru: an ecological study. BMC Public Health 23, 1054 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15537-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15537-7

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us