Skip to main content

Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with hepatitis C: a cross-sectional study of persons who inject drugs in Puerto Rico, 2018

Abstract

Background

People Who Inject Drugs (PWID) are at a higher risk of acquiring bloodborne infections. We aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) in PWID and identify correlates and risk factors using data from the Puerto Rico National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, PWID cycle 5, conducted in 2018.

Methods

A total of 502 San Juan Metropolitan Statistical Area participants were recruited through the Respondent Driven Sampling method. Sociodemographic, health-related, and behavioral characteristics were assessed. Testing for HCV antibodies was completed after the face-to-face survey. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results

Overall seroprevalence of HCV was 76.5% (95% CI: 70.8-81.4%). A significantly (p < 0.05) higher HCV seroprevalence was observed among PWID with the following characteristics: heterosexuals (78.5%), high school graduates (81.3%), tested for sexually transmitted infections (STI) in the past 12 months (86.1%), frequent speedball injection (79.4%), and knowing the HCV serostatus of the last sharing partner (95.4%). Adjusted logistic regression models showed that having completed high school and reported STI testing in the past 12 months were significantly associated with HCV infection (ORa = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.06–4.69; ORa = 2.14; 95% CI: 1.06–4.30, respectively).

Conclusions

We report a high seroprevalence of HCV infection in PWID. Social health disparities and potential missed opportunities validate the continuing call for local action for public health and prevention strategies.

Peer Review reports

Background

It is well documented that People Who Inject Drugs (PWID) are at a higher risk of acquiring various infections through blood, such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) [1,2,3]. There are nearly 11 million PWID worldwide, a group that continues to be impacted by the HIV/AIDS epidemic with an estimated 1.4 million PWID living with HIV [4]. In Puerto Rico (PR), from 1981 to 1999, PWID accounted for most cases of HIV [5]. Data from the PR HIV Surveillance System shows that in 2010, more than 20% of new HIV infections were diagnosed among PWID [6].

Like HIV, HCV in PWID is a public health concern with potential chronic severe sequelae if left unattended. Worldwide, around 5.5 million PWID live with Hepatitis C [4]. In PR, an epidemiological study conducted among PWID in an urban setting reported a prevalence of HCV of 89% [7]; and 78.4% among PWID from rural towns [8]. Like other studies, risk behaviors such as sharing injection equipment [8], injecting more than seven times a day and reusing syringes [9], have been associated with HCV infection.

The National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System (NHBS) has identified an increase in age among cohorts recruited as part of this surveillance system [10]. HCV can increase the progression of liver damage, the risk of highly active antiretroviral therapy-related hepatotoxicity, and mortality in people living with HIV [11, 12]. In addition, chronic infection with HIV coinfection has been identified as a risk factor for hepatocellular cancer, the most common type of primary liver cancer [13, 14]. The biological interaction between HCV and HIV, particularly in older cohorts, is worrisome, given that PR has been characterized by consistently having one of the highest incidence rates of HIV/AIDS in all states and territories of the United States (US) [11].

Although the epidemiology of HIV and HCV among PWID has been extensively evaluated across different studies in PR [7, 8, 11, 15,16,17,18,19], there has been no up-to-date study to assess the burden of HCV and emergent practices among PWID in PR. We thus aim to estimate the HCV seroprevalence in PWID. We also aim to identify correlates and risk factors associated with HCV using the PR National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system PWID cycle five conducted in 2018 (PR-NHBS-PWID-5). We estimate HCV seroprevalence using NHBS-PWID data in PR for the first time. The value of the data collected during the chosen cycle is that before this assessment, HCV prevalence using NHBS data relied only on self-report. Having more recent HCV estimates will help us delineate future HCV prevention efforts in PR.

Methods

Data source

National HIV behavioral surveillance study

NHBS is a serial cross-sectional survey that monitors the prevalence of HIV, sexual and drug-use behaviors, and HIV testing. The methodology used in the NHBS study has been described elsewhere [20, 21]. We used data from the fifth PWID cycle of the PR-NHBS completed in 2018. A total of 506 participants were part of the study. Briefly, the NHBS-PWID-5 (2018) recruitment was done through the Respondent Driven Sampling method (RDS), a chain-referral sampling strategy similar to snowball sampling that allows reaching hidden populations through a dual incentive system [22, 23]. Respondent Driven Sampling begins with the selection of a small number of recruiters (seeds) by the NHBS staff after a formative assessment with key informants who work with PWID. These seeds recruit project participants, who recruit other participants forming a chain [24]. Our analysis included data from PWID participants (18 years of age or older) who reported injecting drugs during the previous 12 months. Recent needle track marks were confirmed by the NHBS staff. Other inclusion criteria included: current residents of the San Juan Metropolitan Statistical Area (SJ-MSA) who could complete the interview in English or Spanish. Participants were recruited in community centers that provide services to the PWID population.

Procedures

Participants signed informed consent before beginning the survey, which was read by an interviewer who also offered a copy to the participants for their record. Recruited participants completed an anonymous standardized face-to-face survey that lasted approximately 25 min with trained interviewers who noted responses using a handheld computer device with the Questionnaire Development System software (NOVA Research Company, version 2.6.1, USA). Both HIV and HCV tests were offered to those who completed the interview. The interview included questions about demographics, sexual practices, drug use, and HIV and HCV testing. The participant’s responses and test results were labeled with a survey number, removing identifying information.

Measures

We used the following variables from the NHBS core questionnaire for our analysis [25]: age, gender, sexual orientation, educational attainment, household income, and health insurance coverage. Characteristics and behaviors of possible exposure to HCV included HIV serostatus and injection practices such as age at first injection and frequency of injection of drugs. Other characteristics, such as awareness of the last sharing partner’s HCV serostatus, were assessed in the questionnaire.

Detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus

Testing for HCV was done using the OraQuick® HCV Rapid Antibody Test (OraSure Technologies Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA) by following the manufacturer’s instructions. The test is an immunoassay for the qualitative detection of antibodies to the HCV (anti-HCV) and was performed through fingerstick and venipuncture of whole blood specimens from individuals 18 years or older. Antibodies in the blood reacting with these peptides and antigens are visualized by colloidal gold-labeled, generating a visible line in the test zone for a reactive sample. The PR-NHBS staff interpreted the result according to the manufacturer’s instructions 20 min later. The test has a sensitivity and specificity of 97.9% and 98.5%, respectively. In addition, for participants who tested positive on the rapid test, the RT-PCR Qualitative HCV RNA test was used as a confirmatory test with a sensitivity of 94.1%, positive predictive value of 72.7%, negative predictive value of 99.9% [26]; and specificity of 99.5 to 100% [27,28,29].

Detection of antigens and antibodies to HIV

Participants samples were tested using Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab combo assay (Abbott Diagnostics Scarborough, Inc., ME, USA), an immunochromatographic fingerstick test for the simultaneous and separate qualitative detection of free Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1), p24 antigen, and antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in whole blood or plasma samples. The viral capsid protein p24 (core) present in HIV-1 and HIV-2 is detected in the blood before the HIV antibody during acute infection. The result was interpreted according to the manufacturer’s instructions between 20 and 30 min after the test. If the preliminary result was positive, we did the confirmatory test by another rapid test, INSTI® HIV-1/HIV-2 Antibody Test (bioLytical Laboratories Inc., Canada). INSTI® HIV-1/HIV-2 Antibody Test [30]; was used to detect antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human whole blood, fingerstick blood, serum, or plasma providing test results in as little as 60 s. The device was spotted with HIV-1 and HIV-2 recombinant proteins, which react with HIV antibodies in the specimen. The procedure and the test reading were carried out following the manufacturer’s instructions. The test has a sensitivity and specificity > 99% [30].

Statistical analysis

Participants identified as transgender (n = 4) were excluded from the sample due to the small sample size. Therefore, a total of 502 participants were included in our analysis. The data were weighted for HCV serostatus using the CDC software Respondent-driven Sampling Analysis Tool (RDSAT 8.1.45™). Descriptive analyses were stratified by HCV serostatus. HCV seroprevalence was calculated for sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to assess statistical differences in the distribution of different characteristics and behaviors. A logistic regression analysis was used to assess the associations of selected variables that were statistically significant (p < 0.05) or tended to statistical significance (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10) in the bivariate analysis. Variables such as speedball (mixture of cocaine and heroin) injection frequency and the participant’s knowledge of the HCV serostatus of the last person with whom they shared injection equipment were significant in the bivariate analysis but were excluded in the final model because both are conditioned variables. We used behavioral and clinical data from the core PR-NHBS interview to describe drug use by HCV serostatus. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were conducted using STATA 17™.

Results

The sociodemographic, health-related, and drug consumption characteristics by HCV serostatus of the PWID are shown in Table 1. Most PWIDs were men (84.7%) and 40 years or older (66.5%). Most participants reported a household income ranging from $0 to $4,999 (81.4%). Moreover, 40.5% and 37.5% PWID reported completing less than high school or obtaining a high school diploma, respectively. More than half of PWID reported having health insurance (63.1%), with the majority being government insurance (98.4%). The weighted prevalence of HIV among the PWID was 10.8%. Most participants reported not having an STI test in the past 12 months before the interview (78.8%) (data not shown).

The PWID weighted seroprevalence of HCV was 76.5%. Those PWID who reported being heterosexuals had a significantly higher HCV seroprevalence (78.5%). Those PWID who reported either being a high school graduate or having less than high school had a higher seroprevalence of HCV (81.3%), and 77.9%, respectively). The PWID who tested for STIs in the past 12 months had a significantly higher HCV seroprevalence (86.1%).

Of those PWID who started injecting at or before 20 years of age, 80.9% were HCV positive. Among PWID who reported injecting speedball daily or more than daily, 79.4% were HCV positive (Table 1). No statistical differences were noted regarding sharing behaviors among PWID but participants reported using a needle after someone else had used it the last time they shared with someone; and of these, 78.2% were HCV-positive. Meanwhile, 198 PWID reported using equipment (cooker, cotton, or water) after someone else had already used it; of those, 86.2% were HCV-positive (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic, health-related, and drug consumption characteristics by HCV Serostatus, PWID-NHBS Cycle 2018 (n = 502)

Adjusted weighted logistic regression analysis showed that PWID who had completed high school had increased odds of having HCV compared to those who had completed some college or more (ORa = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.06–4.69). PWID tested for a sexually transmitted infection, such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, or syphilis, had higher odds of having HCV when compared to those that were not tested (ORa = 2.14; 95% CI: 1.06–4.30). Moreover, those PWID who started injecting at or before 20 years of age had higher odds of being HCV positive when compared to those that started injecting at 21 years or more (ORa = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.84–2.53); however, the relative excess was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2 Weighted multivariate analysis for factors associated with HCV-positive serostatus among PWID, NHBS Cycle 2018 (n = 498)

Discussion

We describe the seroprevalence and correlates associated with HCV infection in a sample of PWID in the SJ-MSA of PR. A weighted HCV seroprevalence of 76.5% was observed. The HCV seroprevalence reported in our study is similar (78.4%) to a study of PWID in rural PR between April and June 2015 [8]; but lower (89%) than a study conducted a decade earlier among PWID living in the San Juan metropolitan area [7]. As expected, the prevalence observed in a population-based study was lower (6.3%) [31]. In addition to the high HCV seroprevalence observed, our results showed that a great number of participants share injection equipment, such as cotton, cookers, or water, which has been repeatedly found to be a risk behavior for HCV transmission [8, 32].

We also report that despite HCV high-risk behavioral practices identified, the practice of sharing needles was lower compared to other injection equipment use, which suggests harm reduction awareness within this group. Harm reduction programs have helped reduce the negative effects or consequences of certain behaviors, particularly drug use [33]. Locally, a few of these programs have been implemented, including Punto Fijo in the San Juan Metropolitan Area [34], Intercambios Puerto Rico in the Eastern region [35] and El Punto en la Montaña in the Central Eastern region [36]. These nonprofit community-based organizations provide new syringes and needles in exchange for used ones (syringe exchange programs) and harm reduction injection kits to reduce HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis transmission, which may have helped reduce the practice among PWID in the metropolitan area of San Juan [7].

In addition to sharing injection equipment, the lack of accessible HCV treatment in PR during the study period may have contributed to the high HCV prevalence. Most participants reported a household income of less than $5,000, which is lower than the estimated median household income [37]. Social disparities, such as lower income, can lead to limited access to treatment [38]. Treatment for HCV is expensive, which makes it less accessible for this population [8, 39, 40]. In recent years, a program offering free oral HCV treatment to those who are members of the PR government health insurance was established [41, 42]. However, awareness and accessibility of the program targeted to underserved and vulnerable populations such as PWID is limited [41, 42].

After adjusting for behavioral and hepatitis-related factors, lower education was associated with a high risk of HCV compared with the highest educational attainment group, which was also reported in a population-based study in PR [31]; and a Danish national registry [43]. Social health disparities, including lower education and socioeconomic status, directly and indirectly, influence PWID’s health [38]. Such disparities can lead to limited access to health resources, risk-reduction information and preventive care, and poorer quality of care, leading to a higher risk of infectious diseases such as HIV and HCV [38].

We report that testing for STIs in the past 12 months is positively associated with HCV which suggests that STI testing is a proxy for access to care, leading to HCV testing opportunities. Interventions by community-based organizations have helped identify HCV-positive cases since HIV/STI, and HCV testing opportunities or referrals to testing are made available to PWID [34,35,36, 44, 45]. Such community-based interventions may provide a feasible venue for further HCV testing and follow-up to determine chronic infection, genotype, and appropriate treatment, helping reduce the chronic impact of HCV among PWID in PR.

Frequent speedball injectors had a higher HCV prevalence. Studies have found that injection of speedball was associated with HCV infection [46, 47]. The injection of speedball can encourage the practice of pooling resources such as money or syringes to divide the mixture into smaller quantities [48], also known as backloading or obtaining drugs [8]. Our findings also showed that most participants who engaged in sharing behaviors were unaware of the HIV or HCV serostatus of the last person they shared with. Those PWID who use speedball daily or more are significantly more likely to inject frequently any drug (p < 0.001), heroin (p = 0.051), and painkillers (p = 0.064) and have lower education (p = 0.083) (post hoc analysis), which have been documented in other studies [49, 50].

We report that those who knew the HCV serostatus of the last sharing person had a higher HCV prevalence which could be explained by selecting higher risk partners based on concordant HCV serostatus [18]. Awareness of ones or sharing partner’s HCV serostatus does not necessarily imply positive changes in behaviors or decisions related to injection drug use if HCV is not considered a risk or concern [51, 52]. However, participants who perceived their partner was HCV positive were associated with decreased odds of engaging in receptive needle/syringe sharing [53]. Moreover, another study reported that PWID aware of their HIV-negative serostatus tended to inject drugs more safely [54], while those PWID who knew they were HIV positive were more likely to never give their drug equipment to other PWID [54].

Limitations

Our study does have several limitations. Firstly, our participants of PWID in PR is mostly adults, which is similar to national data [55], it is important to establish a comparative analysis of adult and young PWID in PR to characterize their drug use practices as well as their behavioral practices [46]. Secondly, our study sample may not be representative of the entire PWID population in PR which may not enable generalization to other cohorts of PWID in PR. Thirdly, a few variables had missing values, which may have produced biased estimates. However, the range of missing values for the variables that were not conditioned was minimal. Fourthly, a chain-referral sampling like RDS has associated biases; however, RDS can control for such biases through proper data collection and analysis. Fifthly, there is the possibility of recall and self-desirability bias due to the participants being asked questions regarding behaviors in the past 12 months, which relies on self-reported data. Lastly, our methodology did not allow for establishing HCV temporal chronicity beyond the test results since the NHBS is a cross-sectional study, the impact of some characteristics associated with HCV cannot be assessed over time.

Conclusion

We have shown that the burden of HCV in the PWID population in PR is high which demonstrates a challenge in health management due to pressing problems related to socioeconomic determinants of health. Efforts to enhance HCV treatment availability and accessibility for PWID are needed. Furthermore, linkage to care, follow-up, and harm reduction programs are critical to reducing HCV infection among PWID which is an ongoing challenge in Puerto Rico.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to restrictions in which only authorized persons have access to the electronic NHBS database. To request more information, please contact the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

Anti-HCV:

Antibodies to hepatitis C virus

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

HCV:

Hepatitis C Virus

HIV:

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

NHBS:

National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System

PR-NHBS-PWID-5:

Puerto Rico National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System PWID cycle five

PR:

Puerto Rico

PWID:

People Who Inject Drugs

RDS:

Respondent-Driven Sampling

SJ-MSA:

San Juan Metropolitan Statistical Area

STI:

Sexually Transmitted Infection

UNODC:

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Among People Who Inject Drugs [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Feb 15]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/hiv-idu.html

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hepatitis C Surveillance in the United States for 2019 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/statistics/2019surveillance/HepC.htm

  3. World Health Organization. People who inject drugs [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Feb 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes/populations/people-who-inject-drugs

  4. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report 2020 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available from: https://wdr.unodc.org/wdr2020/index2020.html

  5. Gomez MA, Fernandez DM, Otero JF, Miranda S, Hunter R. The shape of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Puerto Rico.Pan American journal of Public Health. 2000 Jun;7(6).

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Surveillance Report HIV. 2010; vol. 22 [Internet]. 2012 Mar [cited 2020 Jul 13]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-2010-vol-22.pdf

  7. Reyes JC, Colón HM, Robles RR, Rios E, Matos TD, Negrón J et al. Prevalence and Correlates of Hepatitis C Virus Infection among Street-Recruited Injection Drug Users in San Juan, Puerto Rico.Journal of Urban Health. 2006 Dec8;83(6):1105–13.

  8. Abadie R, Welch-Lazoritz M, Gelpi-Acosta C, Reyes JC, Dombrowski K. Understanding differences in HIV/HCV prevalence according to differentiated risk behaviors in a sample of PWID in rural Puerto Rico.Harm Reduct J. 2016 Dec8;13(1):10.

  9. Bartholomew TS, Onugha J, Bullock C, Scaramutti C, Patel H, Forrest DW, et al. Baseline prevalence and correlates of HIV and HCV infection among people who inject drugs accessing a syringe services program; Miami, FL. Harm Reduct J. 2020 Dec 10;17(1):40.

  10. Burt RD, Thiede H. Evaluating consistency in repeat surveys of injection drug users recruited by Respondent-Driven Sampling in the Seattle Area: results from the NHBS-IDU1 and NHBS-IDU2 surveys. Ann Epidemiol. 2012 May;22(5):354–63.

  11. Pérez CM, Albizu C, Peña M, Torres EA, Reyes JC, Colón H, et al. Hepatitis C in Puerto Rico: a time for public health action. P R Health Sci J. 2007 Dec;26(4):395–400.

  12. Sulkowski MS. Viral hepatitis and HIV coinfection. J Hepatol. 2008 Feb;48(2):353–67.

  13. El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of viral Hepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2012 May;142(6):1264–1273e1.

  14. Ringehan M, McKeating JA, Protzer U. Viral hepatitis and liver cancer. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci. 2017 Oct;19(1732):20160274.

  15. Pérez CM, Albizu-García CE, Torres EA. Tackling the Health Challenge posed by Hepatitis C in Puerto Rico: a call for Immediate Public Health actions. P R Health Sci J. 2015 Jun;34(2):53–9.

  16. Finlinson HA, Oliver-Vélez D, Deren S, Cant JGH, Colón HM, Robles RR, et al. A longitudinal study of Syringe Acquisition by Puerto rican injection drug users in New York and Puerto Rico: implications for Syringe Exchange and distribution programs. Subst Use Misuse. 2006 Jan;41(1):1313–36.

  17. Reyes JC, Robles RR, Colón HM, Matos TD, Finlinson HA, Marrero CA et al. Homelessness and HIV Risk Behaviors Among Drug Injectors in Puerto Rico.J Urban Health. 2005 Jul6;82(3):446–55.

  18. Duncan I, Curtis R, Reyes JC, Abadie R, Khan B, Dombrowski K. Hepatitis C serosorting among people who inject drugs in rural Puerto Rico. Prev Med Rep. 2017 Jun;6:38–43.

  19. Abadie R, Welch-Lazoritz M, Khan B, Dombrowski K. Social determinants of HIV/HCV co-infection: a case study from people who inject drugs in rural Puerto Rico. Addict Behav Rep. 2017 Jun;5:29–32.

  20. Mackellar DA, Gallagher KM, Finlayson T, Sanchez T, Lansky A, Sullivan PS. Surveillance of HIV Risk and Prevention Behaviors of Men Who Have Sex with Men—A National Application of Venue-Based, Time-Space Sampling.Public Health Reports. 2007;1(122).

  21. Wejnert C, Le B, Rose CE, Oster AM, Smith AJ, Zhu J. HIV infection and awareness among men who have sex with Men-20 cities, United States, 2008 and 2011. PLoS ONE. 2013 Oct;23(10):1–9.

  22. Heckathorn DD, Respondent-Driven Sampling. A New Approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997 May;44(2):174–99.

  23. Badowski G, Somera LP, Simsiman B, Lee HR, Cassel K, Yamanaka A, et al. The efficacy of respondent-driven sampling for the health assessment of minority populations. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;50:214–20.

  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National HIV Behavioral Surveillance, Injection Drug Use – Round 5: Operations Manual [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics/systems/nhbs/NHBS_IDU5_Operations_Manual.pdf

  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NHBS Round, 5 CRQ. (2017–2019) [Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018 [cited 2022 Aug 24]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics/systems/nhbs/NHBS_CRQ_R5_IDU5.pdf

  26. Gao F, Talbot EA, Loring CH, Power JJ, Dionne-Odom J, Alroy-Preis S, et al. Performance of the OraQuick HCV rapid antibody test for screening exposed patients in a hepatitis c outbreak investigation. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(7):2650–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cha YJ, Park Q, Kang ES, Yoo BC, Park KU, Kim JW et al. Performance Evaluation of the OraQuick Hepatitis C Virus Rapid Antibody Test. Ann Lab Med. 2013 May 1;33(3):184–9.

  28. Lee SR, Kardos KW, Schiff E, Berne CA, Mounzer K, Banks AT, et al. Evaluation of a new, rapid test for detecting HCV infection, suitable for use with blood or oral fluid. J Virol Methods. 2011 Mar;172(1–2):27–31.

  29. Mane A, Sacks J, Sharma S, Singh H, Tejada-Strop A, Kamili S et al. Evaluation of five rapid diagnostic tests for detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV): A step towards scale-up of HCV screening efforts in India.PLoS One. 2019 Jan17;14(1):e0210556.

  30. Bwana P, Ochieng’ L, Mwau M. Performance and usability evaluation of the INSTI HIV self-test in Kenya for qualitative detection of antibodies to HIV. Ito E, editor. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0202491.

  31. Pérez CM, Suárez E, Torres EA, Román K, Colón V. Seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus and associated risk behaviours: a population-based study in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Jun 1;34(3):593–9.

  32. Pouget ER, Hagan H, des Jarlais DC. Meta-analysis of hepatitis C seroconversion in relation to shared syringes and drug preparation equipment. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2012 Jun;107(6):1057–65.

  33. van den Berg C, Smit C, van Brussel G, Coutinho R, Prins M, Amsterdam Cohort. Full participation in harm reduction programmes is associated with decreased risk for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus: evidence from the Amsterdam Cohort Studies among drug users. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2007 Sep;102(9):1454–62.

  34. Iniciativa Comunitaria. Punto Fijo [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 7]. Available from: https://www.iniciativacomunitaria.org/punto-fijo/

  35. Intercambios Puerto Rico [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 7]. Available from: https://intercambiospr.org

  36. El Punto en. la Montaña [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 7]. Available from: https://www.elpuntopr.org

  37. Census Bureau US, Census Bureau US. 2016–2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates v [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/PR/INC110220

  38. Galea S, Vlahov D. Social determinants and the health of drug users: socioeconomic status, homelessness, and incarceration. Public Health Rep. 2002;117(Suppl 1):135–45.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rodriguez CH, Kaiser Health News. People in Puerto Rico Can’t Get the Same Hepatitis C Meds as Other American Citizens Do. VICE [Internet]. 2019 Jan 2 [cited 2023 Feb 2]; Available from: https://www.vice.com/en/article/8xpj3p/puerto-rico-hepatitis-c-meds-medicaid

  40. Halter C. Medicaid Patients in Puerto Rico Still Can’t Access Hepatitis C Treatment. hep [Internet]. 2019 Jan 9 [cited 2023 Feb 2]; Available from: https://www.hepmag.com/article/medicaid-patients-puerto-rico-still-access-hepatitis-c-treatment

  41. Equipo Voces. Conoce la opción gratuita para contrarrestar la Hepatitis C en Puerto Rico. VOCES Puerto Rico; 2021.

  42. Puerto Rico lifts barriers to Hepatitis C treatment access for Managed Care. [Internet]. Abarca Health LLC. 2020. Available from: https://abarcahealth.com/puerto-rico-lifts-barriers-to-hepatitis-c-treatment-access-for-managed-care/

  43. Omland LH, Osler, Jepsen P, Krarup, Weis C et al. Socioeconomic status in HCV infected patients - risk and prognosis.Clin Epidemiol. 2013 May;163.

  44. Puerto Rico Health Department Viral Hepatitis Prevention Program. Prevention: Viral Hepatitis [Internet]. Puerto Rico Health Department. 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.salud.gov.pr/CMS/327

  45. Groves AK, Stankard P, Bowler SL, Jamil MS, Gebrekristos LT, Smith PD, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for community-based HIV testing on men’s engagement in the HIV care cascade. Int J STD AIDS. 2022 Nov;33(13):1090–105.

  46. Abara WE, Trujillo L, Broz D, Finlayson T, Teshale E, Paz-Bailey G et al. Age-related differences in past or present Hepatitis C Virus infection among People Who Inject Drugs: National Human Immunodeficiency Virus Behavioral Surveillance, 8 US Cities, 2015. J Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 2;220(3):377–85.

  47. Arasteh K, des Jarlais DC, Feelemyer J, McKnight C. Hepatitis C incidence and prevalence among puerto rican people who use drugs in New York City. Glob Public Health. 2020 Dec;15(1):1789–99.

  48. Hautala D, Abadie R, Khan B, Dombrowski K. Rural and urban comparisons of polysubstance use profiles and associated injection behaviors among people who inject drugs in Puerto Rico. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Dec;181:186–93.

  49. Colón HM, Robles RR, Deren S, Sahai H, Finlinson HA, Andía J, et al. Between–City variation in frequency of Injection among Puerto Rican injection drug users: East Harlem, New York, and Bayamon, Puerto Rico. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001 Aug;27(4):405–13.

  50. Newcombe R. Multi-Drug Injecting in Manchester: A survey of 100 injecting drug users attending Lifeline Needle Exchange Scheme in 2006. Lifeline Publications [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2022 Mar 2]; Available from: http://drugslibrary.wordpress.stir.ac.uk/files/2017/04/Speedball20res20small.pdf

  51. Fisher KA, Cahill LM, Broyles S, Rorke M, Robinson WT. Knowledge of hepatitis C status moderates the relationship between history of drug treatment and sterile syringe use.PLoS One. 2018 Apr27;13(4):e0196157.

  52. Page K, Evans JL, Hahn JA, Vickerman P, Shiboski S, Morris MD. HCV incidence is associated with injecting partner age and HCV serostatus mixing in young adults who inject drugs in San Francisco. PLoS ONE. 2019 Dec;10(12):e0226166.

  53. Hahn JA, Evans JL, Davidson PJ, Lum PJ, Page K. Hepatitis C virus risk behaviors within the partnerships of young injecting drug users.Addiction. 2010 May14;105(7):1254–64.

  54. Desenclos JC, Papaevangelou G. Knowledge of HIV serostatus and preventive behaviour among european injecting drug users. AIDS. 1993 Oct;7(10):1371–8.

  55. Broz D, Wejnert C, Pham HT, DiNenno E, Heffelfinger JD, Cribbin M et al. HIV infection and risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among Injecting Drug Users - National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, 20 U.S. cities, 2009 [Internet]. 2014 Jul [cited 2022 Feb 23]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6306a1.htm

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the study participants for their time. Our gratitude also goes to the interviewers, field staff, and personnel from Coaí, Inc. for their diligent work during the implementation of the study and the data collection process and to Dr. Erick Suárez for his expertise and assistance in our study. The findings and conclusions stated in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Funding

NHBS-PWID Cycle 2018 was supported by grant 5NU62PS055075-03-00 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. No competing financial conflicts of interest exist.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VCL, JCRP, YRC, and JLRL were involved in the manuscript’s concept and design, analysis interpretation, writing, and final approval. NCA and IYAS were involved in the manuscript’s concept and design, analysis execution, and manuscript writing. MPM contributed to the manuscript’s concept and design. PMAF was involved in the manuscript’s concept re-evaluation, analysis execution, data interpretation, and manuscript writing critical revision. All authors agree to be accountable for the work presented here.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivian Colón-López.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval for this study was obtained through the UPR-Medical Science Campus Institutional Review Board (A0910118). All methods were performed in accordance with the guidelines, regulations, and local policies for human subjects protection. All participants agreed to participate in the study through written informed consent, which the interviewer read before beginning the survey. Respondents had the option of participating in the survey but decline the HIV or HCV tests that were offered.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colón-López, V., Alvelo-Fernández, P.M., Centeno-Alvarado, N. et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with hepatitis C: a cross-sectional study of persons who inject drugs in Puerto Rico, 2018. BMC Public Health 23, 704 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15341-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15341-3

Keywords