Skip to main content

Perceived influence of alcohol consumption, substance use, and mental health on PrEP adherence and condom use among PrEP-prescribed gay, bisexual, and other men-who-have-sex-with-men: a qualitative investigation



Gay, bisexual, and other men-who-have-sex-with-men (GBMSM) continue to be disproportionately affected by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Although HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) offers an effective means of reducing incident HIV among this population, the HIV-preventive success of oral-based PrEP is contingent upon regimen adherence. Elevated rates of alcohol-, substance use-, and mental health-related issues among GBMSM potentially hinder PrEP-taking efforts, however the evidence for this remains mixed. Accordingly, the present study entailed a comprehensive qualitative investigation to explore PrEP-prescribed GBMSM’s perceptions surrounding the influence of alcohol, substance use, and mental health on PrEP adherence.


PrEP-prescribed GBMSM (age ≥ 18 years; prescribed PrEP for ≥ 3 months) were recruited from two PrEP-delivery clinics in Toronto, Canada for focus groups as part of the formative phase of an alcohol-, substance use-, and mental health-focused randomized controlled intervention trial. Focus group discussions qualitatively explored perceived strengths and barriers associated with adherence to PrEP treatment; with an emphasis on alcohol, substance use, and mental health concerns. Condom use among PrEP-prescribed GBMSM within the context of these concerns was also discussed.


A total of five focus groups involving 35 GBMSM were conducted (4–10/group; mean age = 42.4; white = 71.4%). Although participants themselves generally reported successfully adhering to their PrEP regimens—resulting from a strong, underlying motivation for self-care—they recognized the detrimental impact that alcohol, substance use, and mental health had on adherence among their peers. In this regard, alcohol and substances were perceived as detracting from adherence only when consumption was excessive or temporally linked to PrEP dosing. Pronounced mental health issues (e.g., severe depression) were also seen as hindering adherence, although these effects were nuanced and perceived as person-dependent. Alcohol and substances were linked to condomless sex, regardless of PrEP use, and PrEP was therefore viewed as an HIV-protective ‘safety net.’


Overall, findings suggest that PrEP adherence can often be successfully achieved in the presence of alcohol-, substance use-, and mental health-related issues. Augmenting self-care, and addressing pronounced addictions- and mental health-related concerns, may enhance PrEP treatment among GBMSM.

Peer Review reports


Despite a modest decline in the global incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in recent years [1], key populations continue to be disproportionately affected by the virus. In particular, incident HIV remains pronounced among populations of gay, bisexual, and other men-who-have-sex-with-men (GBMSM), who comprised 23% of new HIV infections globally in 2019 [2]. This disparity is especially evident in countries such as the United States and Canada, where recent surveillance data have demonstrated that GBMSM comprise 69% [3] and 41% [4] of all new HIV infections, respectively.

Within this context, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) serves as a crucial component that can considerably help curtail incident HIV among GBMSM. PrEP typically entails oral dosing of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) or tenofovir alafenamide and emtricitabine (TAF/FTC), which can markedly reduce the likelihood of acquiring HIV if exposed to the virus [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. PrEP’s ability to prevent HIV acquisition, however, has been shown to be strongly associated with regimen adherence, for both daily [6, 8, 9, 12,13,14,15] and non-daily PrEP regimens [8, 16]. Although a long-acting injectable form of PrEP has recently emerged that eliminates the requirement for daily oral dosing [17], its regulatory approval currently remains limited to a small number of jurisdictions. As a result, sustained adherence to oral dosing of TDF/FTC or TAF/FTC remains a necessity for the broader population of PrEP users.

Behavioral and psychosocial barriers may hinder PrEP-taking efforts [18, 19]; with the consumption of alcohol and/or substances, as well as the experience of mental health concerns such as depression, potentially serving as considerable challenges. The prevalence of these barriers tends to be higher among GBMSM, including GBMSM who have been prescribed PrEP, compared to the general population [20,21,22,23,24,25]; which in part may derive from a range of unique stressors and socio-contextual factors that GBMSM experience (e.g., [26]). However, while alcohol, substance use, and mental health issues have all been significantly associated with poorer adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among GBMSM who are living with HIV [27, 28], the associations between these issues and adherence specifically to PrEP have been somewhat less consistent.

On the one hand, evidence from some quantitative and qualitative investigations has provided support for associations between lower PrEP adherence and alcohol consumption [29,30,31,32,33,34], substance use [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41], and depression [40,41,42,43]; suggesting that these factors may hinder one’s motivation and/or ability to take PrEP as prescribed. In contrast, findings from other studies have demonstrated that some GBMSM are able to successfully adhere to their PrEP regimens, even when experiencing addictions- and mental health-related concerns [36,37,38,39, 44, 45]. Within this regard, it is possible that these latter individuals may have adopted unique strategies (e.g., taking PrEP before using a substance, taking PrEP as part of a pre-sex routine) that enable them to maintain PrEP adherence in spite of underlying challenges [34, 35, 44]. Alternatively, it may be the case that the degree of severity with which these addictions- and mental health-related challenges are manifested influences the extent of the associations with PrEP-taking behaviors [33, 46]. A third possibility is that individuals who consume alcohol or substances may be cognizant of their increased likelihood of engaging in condomless sex, and in turn amplify their PrEP-taking efforts [45].

Interestingly, this latter supposition highlights the added complexity surrounding condom use decisions among PrEP-prescribed GBMSM who may be experiencing issues involving alcohol, substances, and/or mental health. Despite PrEP’s ability to serve as an additional means of HIV protection among such individuals [47], the presence of addictions- and mental health-related issues could potentially inhibit both PrEP adherence and the use of condoms, resulting in an elevated risk of HIV acquisition. The diminished use of condoms can also elevate one’s risk of acquiring other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis.

Taken together, greater clarity is needed to delineate the complex interplay of alcohol, substance use, and mental health in relation to PrEP adherence and condom use among PrEP-prescribed GBMSM. The present study entailed a comprehensive, qualitative investigation to explore the dynamics that underpin this interplay.


Data collection

As part of the formative research phase of a randomized-controlled intervention trial ( Identifier: NCT05097430), men from two clinics providing PrEP in Toronto, Canada were recruited through convenience sampling to participate in one of five focus group discussions on PrEP-related experiences. The recruitment process involved clinic staff mentioning the study to their patients and referring those were interested to a study research team member, who then provided detailed information about the study and arranged participation in a focus group session. Eligibility criteria included 1) age ≥ 18 years; 2) identifying as GBMSM; and 3) prescribed PrEP for ≥ 3 months.

Participants provided informed written consent and completed a brief demographic survey for sample characterization (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, education). Semi-structured focus group discussions (~ 2 h in length) were held in person to explore strengths and barriers impacting participants’ adherence to daily PrEP treatment and use of condoms; with an additional emphasis on alcohol, substance use, and mental health. Focus groups were conducted by a Professor in Epidemiology who works in the area of sexual health and possesses extensive experience conducting focus groups with diverse populations, including GBMSM and other marginalized groups. All sessions were audio-recorded, and recordings were transcribed verbatim and reviewed for accuracy. Participants received CAD $50 (~ USD $40) for taking part. Procedures were approved by Research Ethics Boards at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (#101/2017) and the University Health Network (#18–5014).

Data analysis

Summary statistics of survey responses were generated through SPSS [48] to describe the study sample. A combined deductive/inductive thematic analysis was employed to analyze focus group transcripts with the intention of developing an in-depth understanding about the roles of alcohol, substance use, and mental health in relation to daily PrEP adherence and condom use ([49], p. 86). A deductive approach was taken to explore themes identified from the research question and topics addressed by the focus group guide, while an inductive analysis was also implemented to identify new themes interpreted from the data. The analytic process included data familiarization, developing a coding framework based on established and newly identified topics, iterative development of themes, a review of themes by the research team, finalization of themes, and writing [49].

NVivo was used to store, code, and organize focus group data [50]. A preliminary list of broad categories was developed based on the research question a priori by the study’s Principal Investigator (PI), Co-Investigators, and Research Coordinator, who possess expertise and experience in the fields of HIV, mental health, and addictions. Two graduate-level Research Assistants trained in qualitative analysis actively employed several analytic strategies, including deeply familiarizing with the transcripts, conceptualizing the data in relation to scholarship, theory, and accounts within and across the transcripts, and taking a team approach [51]. A subgroup of the research team, which included the PI, Research Coordinator, and Focus Group Facilitator, was consulted after the Research Assistants had coded the first two focus groups to discuss the identified codes, possible themes, and resolve discrepancies between coders [52]. A codebook was developed once all focus groups had been analyzed. Codes were collated to generate categories and themes across the data set, and themes were reviewed and refined by the above-mentioned research team subgroup and Research Assistants. Rich descriptions and illustrative quotes were used to convey participants’ experiences and opinions and researchers’ interpretations.


Five focus groups with 35 PrEP-prescribed GBMSM (4–10 participants/group) were conducted from June to August 2018. Socio-demographic characteristics can be found in Table 1. Participants had a mean age of 42.4 years, 71.4% were white, and average household income was CAD $112,700 (~ USD $90,160). Roughly three quarters of participants (76.5%) had been using PrEP for more than 12 months.

Table 1 Sample Demographics (n = 35)

PrEP adherence

Adherence was discussed in terms of daily dosing, as focus group participants had been prescribed daily PrEP regimens. Within this context, although using alcohol and substances and experiencing poorer mental health were seen as having the potential to impact PrEP adherence in the general PrEP-prescribed GBMSM population, study participants themselves did not appear to let challenges detract them from their PrEP use. Participants reported being concertedly dedicated to their health and wellbeing; prioritizing self-care (i.e., maintaining adherence) regardless of encountered barriers such as “bout(s) of depression” (Focus Group 1 (FG1)) or casual drinking/substance use. One participant described the relationship between his mental health and PrEP adherence:

“When I’ve had sort of different varying mental health stages, I’ve been able to stay on pills but that’s because I don’t see it as something that is hard to do when I’m maybe going through a challenging bout of whatever.” (FG3)

Another participant shared a similar sentiment about the relationship between his alcohol and substance use and PrEP adherence:

“I smoke weed every day and I’m a social drinker. Never would I think, “Oh, too drugged to open a pill box and make sure it goes down and keep it down.” (FG4)

However, when speaking of peers’ experiences with poor mental health or using alcohol or substances, participants identified the potential for these aspects to have an impact on their ability to maintain PrEP use. For example, one participant said, “If you’re drunk a lot, you’re susceptible to forgetting to take your pill.” (FG5) Another participant shared:

“I have a number of friends who have been through episodes of mental illness and continued mental illness…I would say it definitely would impact because you become so absorbed in your own cyclone of personal issues that I think things could go by the way…including taking medications.” (FG2)

Two themes related to alcohol, substance use, and PrEP adherence were identified – the degree of intoxication, and the temporal overlap of alcohol/substance use and PrEP dosing. Additionally, two themes related to mental health and PrEP adherence were described—severity of mental health, and the motivation to adhere when experiencing mental health issues.

Degree of alcohol- and substance-related intoxication

Men noted that the ability to adhere to PrEP depends on one’s level of intoxication. Participants felt that men who are drunk or high are probably not going to be able to perform the necessary “checks and balances” (FG5) that allow them to remember to take their pill. One participant described:

“If you’re supposed to take a pill once a day or whatever time of day but you’ve gone out and you’re like totally hammered and drunk and omg you come home and you just pass out. Then you might not take your pill obviously…I think there’s different levels of being intoxicated.” (FG3)

Participants also reported that taking PrEP on a daily basis can be a barrier for men who have marked substance use issues compared to those who use occasionally. Participants felt that men who are dependent on alcohol or substances may be engaging in self-destructive behaviors that prevent them from focusing on their health and keeping up with their PrEP care. One participant stated:

“I guess the only real barrier is somebody who actually has an addiction problem. That’s a different case. I don’t think if somebody’s drinking on the weekend then that’s stopping them from going on PrEP in any way.” (FG1)

Temporal overlap of alcohol/substance use and PrEP dosing

A barrier to adherence noted by participants was the overlap between the timing of PrEP doses and the consumption of alcohol or substances. Participants suggested that men who are out partying and using substances may not think about taking their pill on schedule. For example:

“You’re high at the time that you should be taking your pill and when your high is gone it’s the next day and you’ve actually missed an entire dose and you’re not going to have the foresight to do it ahead of time and you’re not going to think back and be like, “oh well I didn’t take a pill.” You’re just going to wait for the next time to take your pill. So you’re in effect, skipping doses.” (FG3)

However, participants also offered solutions, such as changing the timing of PrEP dosing so that there was no conflict. As one participant shared, “I don’t know—if a friend came to me and was like, “I always miss my doses.” Like, well are you getting high at 9am? And if you are, great, take the dose at 8.” (FG3).

Severity of mental health

The severity of mental health issues was identified as a theme associated with PrEP adherence. Some study participants reported diagnosed mental illnesses (e.g., depression, bipolar disorder) or poorer mental health in general and also reported few issues with adherence themselves. However, these same participants also noted that mental health may have a detrimental impact on PrEP adherence among individuals experiencing a severe mental health episode. As one participant described, “Depending on what they’re going through with their mental health…taking a pill might be too big of a deal.” (FG3).

Motivation to adhere when experiencing mental health issues

Participants described how experiencing poor mental health (e.g., depression) could lead to a lower sex drive and fewer sexual encounters, and how during these periods, one might question why they should continue taking PrEP. For instance, one participant shared,“…for me, if I’m not feeling good or whatever…I’m probably not having sex. In that case, I would think why should I bother? Why should I even continue taking this?” (FG2).

Meanwhile, others who felt their sexual behavior was impacted by their mental health did not believe that their daily routines, including taking PrEP, were compromised. An overall commitment to ongoing self-care was consistent through sentiments of: “…well, I’m just going to take this.” (FG3). One participant explained:

“I mean I didn’t have as much of a high sex drive anyways during that period of time but I still saw the need to take my PrEP even though I wasn’t even having sex at the time. Just because that was just a part of my lifestyle at that time.” (FG4)

Condom use

Two themes emerged around the relationship between the consumption of alcohol and substances and the use of condoms: a generalized increase in condomless sex when intoxicated, regardless of taking PrEP; and relying on PrEP as a means of protection when intoxicated. Similarly, two mental health-related themes emerged: individualized perceptions regarding the links between mental health and condom use; and PrEP’s protective benefits among those experiencing mental health issues.

Increased condomless sex while intoxicated, regardless of PrEP use

Some participants reported that their alcohol and substance use had more of an impact on their ability to use condoms than to adhere to PrEP. Participants reported that irrespective of being on PrEP, using alcohol or substances impacted both the ability to evaluate risk and the resultant engagement in condomless sex. As one participant explained, “If you’re drunk and high and you’re even that much more inebriated and not able to make a proper responsible decision.” (FG1) This sentiment was personalized by another participant who shared, “Personally, if I’m a little drunk or high or whatever, I will be less likely to use a condom.” (FG2).

PrEP as a means of protection while intoxicated

Participants felt that taking PrEP was their way of balancing being responsible with feeling free by preemptively preparing for risky situations that involved lowered inhibitions and condomless sexual encounters. As one participant described,

“Some of them will start to take PrEP because they want to feel a little bit more protected and exactly feel freer to just keep drinking or taking more drugs and having sex or looking for sex as a consequence of that.” (FG1).

Another participant disclosed that he started to take PrEP after his sexual encounter with a man who was HIV-positive, which transpired because of his alcohol use.

Mental health, condom use, and PrEP – a range of perceptions

Interestingly, unlike alcohol and substance use, mental health was not consistently associated with condomless sex among PrEP users. Instead, responses were highly individualized; reflecting diverse perceptions ranging from inconsequential to important. One participant shared:

“I’ve never felt that my depression or the state of my mental health has had an impact on the sexual choices I make and my behaviors.” (FG1)

Another shared:

“Whether or not condom use happens depends upon their own sexual behaviors and whatever they might be dealing with.” (FG1)

PrEP as an additional layer of protection when experiencing mental health issues

Participants shared that they take PrEP as a ‘safety net’ (FG3) for times where they are in a state of depression or apathy and consequently are not as concerned about potentially riskier sexual practices. One participant described,

“…if you’re already at a point where your sort of level of self-care isn’t great or you’re depressed or you’re suicidal…it’s sort of…something like, ‘oh well. So, what? So, what if this happens?’ PrEP for me has sort of been this sort of ‘safety net.’” (FG3)


Findings suggest that study participants tended to be highly motivated to maintain their PrEP care, and that PrEP adherence can be successfully achieved for many GBMSM who consume alcohol, use substances, or experience depression. However, participants speculated that consistent PrEP use may be challenging for those whose alcohol consumption or substance use is excessive or temporally linked to PrEP dosing, or whose mental health has deteriorated to the point that they are no longer taking care of themselves and the motivation to maintain their health and well-being is diminished. The use of alcohol and substances was also recognized as a barrier to using condoms during sex, but this detrimental impact was perceived to be present regardless of being on PrEP. Within this regard, taking PrEP was deemed as an effective ‘safety net’ to prevent HIV acquisition.

Our findings support the use of PrEP for HIV prevention among GBMSM, despite this population’s disproportionate burden of addictions and mental health concerns [20,21,22,23,24,25, 53, 54]. Results not only accord with previous research (e.g., [45]) by demonstrating that concerted adherence efforts may be undertaken to counteract the greater likelihood of condomless sex while under the influence or when experiencing mental health issues, but they also extend this work and provide new insight by suggesting that the possession of a strong, underlying motivation for “self-care,” reflecting one’s attitudes and behaviors relevant for the prevention or self-management of a health-related concern [55], can help surmount the challenges that alcohol, substance use, and mental health issues potentially pose on PrEP-taking efforts. Self-care in general [55], along with associated constructs involving one’s motivation to stay healthy [56] and one’s focus on health-promotion and healthy practices [57], have been identified as key facilitators of HIV treatment and HIV-related resilience. Furthermore, interventions that promote a range of self-care-focused behaviors have been shown to be associated with improvements in ART adherence among people living with HIV (PLWH) [58]. Addressing precursors of diminished self-care, including, for example, poor coping skills, social support-seeking behaviors, and stigma management [59, 60], may also be beneficial. Accordingly, within the context of PrEP, offering self-care-associated interventions to GBMSM who have difficulty following their regimen, particularly those who also report concerns surrounding alcohol, substance use, or depression, could prove to be an effective means of maintaining long-term adherence among this group.

Importantly, however, while such self-care-promotive interventions may be beneficial for GBMSM who experience relatively less-pronounced alcohol-, substance use-, and mental health-related issues, findings from both the present study and previous research [33, 46] suggest that adherence will likely remain challenging for those with relatively more severe issues. As such, the impact of self-care interventions on their own may be insufficient to improve adherence among this latter group. Therefore, for these individuals, a potentially effective approach could follow methods successfully employed with PLWH, in which the delivery of addictions- and mental health-focused interventions results in the amelioration of the associated underlying conditions, which in turn leads to corresponding improvements in ART adherence [61, 62]. Alternatively, for PrEP-prescribed GBMSM who do not want to reduce their alcohol or substance use, a second approach could entail offering interventions that enhance behavioral skills for taking PrEP in the context of ongoing consumption. For example, as suggested by the present results, adherence could be enhanced by first recognizing one’s alcohol and substance use patterns, and then arranging one’s dosing schedule accordingly (see also [35]).

The nuanced relationship described between depression and adherence aligns with disparate findings from previous research [33, 42, 43, 46]. While it is clear that some PrEP-prescribed GBMSM can follow their regimens even when feeling depressed as a result of their strong motivation to maintain self-care, for others, depression may substantially diminish this motivation; leading not only to missed doses, but also to a reduction in condom use when engaged in sexual activity [63]. Despite a reduced desire to have sex when depressed, the potential HIV-related impact of depression remains concerning, given that for some GBMSM, depression-induced diminished self-care may lead to sexual situations that are neither PrEP- nor condom-protected. As such, additional research remains necessary to identify the spectrum of mechanisms that underpin the association between depression and PrEP adherence [43], which in turn could help target depression-focused as well as adherence-promotive intervention efforts to those PrEP-prescribed GBMSM who may benefit from them the most.

Results should be viewed in light of possible limitations. First, recruitment was based on convenience sampling, and participation required travelling to a separate hospital site to take part in a session and then openly discussing one’s PrEP-related experiences. Participants therefore required sufficient ability and motivation to attend a session and disclose potentially sensitive information. As a result, our sample may not have reflected the diversity of GBMSM who were receiving PrEP care at our two clinic sites, or the broader population of PrEP-prescribed GBMSM. Second, the sample was also predominantly white, educated, and high-income, which may have further impacted perspectives on and experiences with PrEP adherence, and in turn, the transferability of the findings. Third, to learn about the experiences of a broad range of PrEP users, recruitment was not limited to those who experienced challenges involving PrEP adherence, alcohol consumption, substance use, or mental health. Those who experience such challenges may also struggle to plan and keep an appointment to participate in a research study. This likely impacted the responses yielded through our focus groups, in which participants typically did not report experiencing pronounced issues pertaining to PrEP adherence, alcohol use, or substance use, but acknowledged that such issues existed among some of their friends and peers who were taking PrEP. Restricting participation to those for whom such issues were considerable may have provided additional unique insights. Fourth, when discussing mental health, participants primarily spoke about depression or feeling mentally unwell, and did not mention mental illnesses such as personality disorders or psychosis. The impact of these latter, and in some cases, far more severe forms of mental illness on PrEP treatment requires further exploration. Finally, during focus groups, the concept of adherence was discussed in terms of taking one’s daily PrEP dose, as participants had been prescribed daily regimens. The additional inclusion of participants who had been prescribed non-daily PrEP regimens may have provided unique insight regarding the impact of alcohol, substance use, and mental health on taking PrEP only in conjunction with the engagement in sexual activity (i.e., 2–1-1 regimen) or when following other intermittent PrEP dosing schedules. Furthermore, expanding the concept of PrEP adherence to “prevention-effective adherence,” [64] which accounts for varying periods of risk exposure and the use of other prevention methods (e.g., treatment-as-prevention), may also have provided further insight.


Findings from the present investigation support the notion that adherence to PrEP can be successfully achieved in the presence of alcohol consumption, substance use, and mental health issues, and may even be ideally suited for such contexts given the ability to use PrEP as an HIV-protective ‘safety net’ that can counteract the corresponding increased likelihood of condomless sex when intoxicated or mentally unwell. Interventions that promote self-care among PrEP-prescribed GBMSM, as well as interventions that address pronounced alcohol, substance use, and mental health concerns, could enhance PrEP treatment efforts among this population.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to research ethics-related requirements but may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Antiretroviral therapy


Gay, bisexual, and other men-who-have-sex-with-men


Human Immunodeficiency Virus


People living with HIV


Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis


Sexually transmitted infection


Tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine


Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine


  1. UNAIDS: Global AIDS update 2019—communities at the centre. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2019. Accessed 6 Oct 2022.

  2. UNAIDS: Seizing the moment: Tackling entrenched inequalities to end epidemics. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2020. Accessed 6 Oct 2022.

  3. HIV surveillance report - Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and Dependent Areas, 2019. Vol. 32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. 2021. Accessed 6 Oct 2022.

  4. Haddad N, Robert A, Weeks A, Popovic N, Siu W, Archibald C. HIV in Canada-surveillance report, 2018. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2019;45(12):304–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, Mugo NR, Campbell JD, Wangisi J, Tappero JW, Bukusi EA, Cohen CR, Katabira E, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. New Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):399–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, Goicochea P, Casapia M, Guanira-Carranza JV, Ramirez-Cardich ME, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. New Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCormack S, Dunn DT, Desai M, Dolling DI, Gafos M, Gilson R, Sullivan AK, Clarke A, Reeves I, Schembri G, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):53–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Molina JM, Capitant C, Spire B, Pialoux G, Cotte L, Charreau I, Tremblay C, Le Gall JM, Cua E, Pasquet A, et al. On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. New Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2237–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, Smith DK, Rose CE, Segolodi TM, Henderson FL, Pathank SR, Soud FA, Chillag KL, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. New Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):423–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson PL, Glidden DV, Liu A, Buchbinder S, Lama JR, Guanira JV, McMahan V, Bushman LR, Casapia M, Montoya-Herrera O, et al. Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(151):151ra125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Volk JE, Marcus JL, Phengrasamy T, Blechinger D, Nguyen DP, Follansbee S, Hare CB. No new HIV infections with increasing use of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in a clinical practice setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(10):1601–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Amico KR, Stirratt MJ. Adherence to preexposure prophylaxis: current, emerging, and anticipated bases of evidence. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(Suppl 1):S55–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Grant RM, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu A, Amico KR, Mehrotra M, Hosek S, Mosquera C, Casapia M, Montoya O, et al. Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(9):820–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Marrazzo JM, Ramjee G, Richardson BA, Gomez K, Mgodi N, Nair G, Palanee T, Nakabiito C, van der Straten A, Noguchi L, et al. Tenofovir-based preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. New Engl J Med. 2015;372(6):509–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, Agot K, Lombaard J, Kapiga S, Malahleha M, Owino F, Manongi R, Onyango J, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. New Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):411–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sivay MV, Li M, Piwowar-Manning E, Zhang Y, Hudelson SE, Marzinke MA, Amico RK, Redd A, Hendrix CW, Anderson PL, et al. Characterization of HIV seroconverters in a TDF/FTC PrEP study: HPTN 067/ADAPT. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75(3):271–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Landovitz RJ, Donnell D, Clement ME, Hanscom B, Cottle L, Coelho L, Cabello R, Chariyalertsak S, Dunne EF, Frank I, et al. Cabotegravir for HIV prevention in cisgender men and transgender women. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(7):595–608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ching SZ, Wong LP, Said MAB, Lim SH. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence among men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Educ Prev. 2020;32(5):416–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Edeza A, Karina Santamaria E, Valente PK, Gomez A, Ogunbajo A, Biello K. Experienced barriers to adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among MSM: a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies. AIDS Care. 2021;33(6):697–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lea T, Ryan D, Prestage G, Zablotska I, Mao L. de WJ, Holt M: Alcohol use among a community-based sample of gay men: correlates of high-risk use and implications for service provision. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2015;34(4):349–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ostrow DG, Stall R. Alcohol, Tobacco, and Drug Use among Gay and Bisexual Men. In: Wolitski RJ, Stall R, Valdiserri RO, editors. Unequal opportunity: health disparities affecting gay and bisexual men in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 121–58.

  22. Vanable PA, McKirnan DJ, Buchbinder SP, Bartholow BN, Douglas JM Jr, Judson FN, MacQueen KM. Alcohol use and high-risk sexual behavior among men who have sex with men: the effects of consumption level and partner type. Health Psychol. 2004;23(5):525–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Woolf SE, Maisto SA. Alcohol use and risk of HIV infection among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(4):757–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marshall BD, Operario D, Bryant KJ, Cook RL, Edelman EJ, Gaither JR, Gordon AJ, Kahler CW, Maisto SA, McGinnis KA, et al. Drinking trajectories among HIV-infected men who have sex with men: a cohort study of United States veterans. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;148:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall BD, Shoveller JA, Kahler CW, Koblin BA, Mayer KH, Mimiaga MJ, van den Berg JJ, Zaller ND, Operario D. Heavy drinking trajectories among men who have sex with men: a longitudinal, group-based analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39(2):380–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hatzenbuehler ML. How does sexual minority stigma “get under the skin”? a psychological mediation framework. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(5):707–30.

  27. Hendershot CS, Stoner SA, Pantalone DW, Simoni JM. Alcohol use and antiretroviral adherence: review and meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;52(2):180–202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Parsons JT, Rosof E, Mustanski B. The temporal relationship between alcohol consumption and HIV-medication adherence: a multilevel model of direct and moderating effects. Health Psychol. 2008;27(5):628–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Haberer JE, Baeten JM, Campbell J, Wangisi J, Katabira E, Ronald A, Tumwesigye E, Psaros C, Safren SA, Ware NC, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a substudy cohort within a clinical trial of serodiscordant couples in East Africa. PLoS Med. 2013;10(9):e1001511.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mugo PM, Sanders EJ, Mutua G, van der Elst E, Anzala O, Barin B, Bangsberg DR, Priddy FH, Haberer JE. Understanding adherence to daily and intermittent regimens of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(5):794–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van der Elst EM, Mbogua J, Operario D, Mutua G, Kuo C, Mugo P, Kanungi J, Singh S, Haberer J, Priddy F, et al. High acceptability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis but challenges in adherence and use: qualitative insights from a phase I trial of intermittent and daily PrEP in at-risk populations in Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2162–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mallayasamy S, Chaturvedula A, Fossler MJ, Sale ME, Hendrix CW, Haberer JE. Assessment of demographic and socio-behavioral factors on adherence to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis using a markov modeling approach. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Shuper PA, Joharchi N, Bogoch II, Loutfy M, Crouzat F, El-Helou P, Knox DC, Woodward K, Rehm J. Alcohol consumption, substance use, and depression in relation to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) nonadherence among gay, bisexual, and other men-who-have-sex-with-men. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1782.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Storholm ED, Volk JE, Marcus JL, Silverberg MJ, Satre DD. Risk perception, sexual behaviors, and PrEP adherence among substance-using men who have sex with men: a qualitative study. Prev Sci. 2017;18(6):737–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Closson EF, Mitty JA, Malone J, Mayer KH, Mimiaga MJ. Exploring strategies for PrEP adherence and dosing preferences in the context of sexualized recreational drug use among MSM: a qualitative study. AIDS Care. 2018;30(2):191–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Grov C, Rendina HJ, John SA, Parsons JT. Determining the roles that club drugs, marijuana, and heavy drinking play in PrEP medication adherence among gay and bisexual men: implications for treatment and research. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(5):1277–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hoenigl M, Little SJ, Grelotti D, Skaathun B, Wagner GA, Weibel N, Stockman JK, Smith DM. Grindr users take more risks, but are more open to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis: could this dating app provide a platform for hiv prevention outreach? Clin Infect Dis. 2019;71(7):e135–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hojilla JC, Vlahov D, Glidden DV, Amico KR, Mehrotra M, Hance R, Grant RM, Carrico AW. Skating on thin ice: stimulant use and sub-optimal adherence to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21(3):e25103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Holtz TH, Chitwarakorn A, Hughes JP, Curlin ME, Varangrat A, Li M, Amico KR, Mock PA, Grant RM. HPTN 067/ADAPT: correlates of sex-related pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence, Thai men who have sex with men, and transgender women, 2012–2013. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(2):e18–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pasipanodya EC, Jain S, Sun X, Blumenthal J, Ellorin E, Corado K, Dube MP, Daar ES, Morris SR, Moore DJ. Trajectories and predictors of longitudinal preexposure prophylaxis adherence among men who have sex with men. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(10):1551–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Spinelli MA, Laborde N, Kinley P, Whitacre R, Scott HM, Walker N, Liu AY, Gandhi M, Buchbinder SP. Missed opportunities to prevent HIV infections among pre-exposure prophylaxis users: a population-based mixed methods study, San Francisco, United States. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(4):e25472.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Colson PW, Franks J, Wu Y, Winterhalter FS, Knox J, Ortega H, El-Sadr WM, Hirsch-Moverman Y. Adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis in black men who have sex with men and transgender women in a community setting in Harlem. NY AIDS Behav. 2020;24(12):3436–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Velloza J, Kemp CG, Aunon FM, Ramaiya MK, Creegan E, Simoni JM. Alcohol use and antiretroviral therapy non-adherence among adults living with HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(6):1727–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. O’Halloran C, Rice B, White E, Desai M, Dunn DT, McCormack S, Sullivan AK, White D, McOwan A, Gafos M. Chemsex is not a barrier to self-reported daily PrEP adherence among PROUD study participants. Int J Drug Policy. 2019;74:246–54.

  45. Velloza J, Bacchetti P, Hendrix CW, Murnane P, Hughes JP, Li M, Curlin ME, Holtz TH, Mannheimer S, Marzinke MA, et al. Short- and long-term pharmacologic measures of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among high-risk men who have sex with men in HPTN 067/ADAPT. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(2):149–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Mehrotra ML, Westreich D, McMahan VM, Glymour MM, Geng E, Grant RM, Glidden DV. Baseline characteristics explain differences in effectiveness of randomization to daily oral TDF/FTC PrEP between transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men in the iPrEx trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;81(3):e94–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Hojilla JC, Koester KA, Cohen SE, Buchbinder S, Ladzekpo D, Matheson T, Liu AY. Sexual behavior, risk compensation, and HIV prevention strategies among participants in the San Francisco PrEP demonstration project: a qualitative analysis of counseling notes. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(7):1461–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for windows. Version 26.0 edition. Armonk: IBM Corp; 2019.

  49. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. NVivo QSR Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software Version 12. Burlington: QSR International Pty Ltd; 2018.

  51. Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1996.

  52. de Casterlé BD, Gastmans C, Bryon E, Denier Y. QUAGOL: a guide for qualitative data analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(3):360–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Flores Anato JL, Panagiotoglou D, Greenwald ZR, Trottier C, Vaziri M, Thomas R, Maheu-Giroux M. Chemsex practices and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trajectories among individuals consulting for PrEP at a large sexual health clinic in Montreal, Canada (2013–2020). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;226:108875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Maxwell S, Shahmanesh M, Gafos M. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake and adherence experiences of gay and bisexual men who engage in chemsex: a qualitative study. Int J Drug Policy. 2022;103:103630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chou FY, Holzemer WL. Linking HIV/AIDS clients’ self-care with outcomes. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2004;15(4):58–67.

  56. Nhassengo P, Cataldo F, Magaco A, Hoffman RM, Nerua L, Saide M, Cuco R, Hoek R, Mbofana F, Couto A, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of test and treat in Mozambique: a qualitative study on patient and provider perceptions. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(12):e0205919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Harper GW, Bruce D, Hosek SG, Fernandez MI, Rood BA. Resilience processes demonstrated by young gay and bisexual men living with HIV: implications for intervention. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2014;28(12):666–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Saberi P, Johnson MO. Technology-based self-care methods of improving antiretroviral adherence: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(11):e27533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Johnson MO, Dilworth SE, Taylor JM, Neilands TB. Improving coping skills for self-management of treatment side effects can reduce antiretroviral medication nonadherence among people living with HIV. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(1):83–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Swendeman D, Ingram BL, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Common elements in self-management of HIV and other chronic illnesses: an integrative framework. AIDS Care. 2009;21(10):1321–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Carey KB, Johnson BT, Carey MP. Behavioral interventions targeting alcohol use among people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(Suppl 2):126–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Sin NL, DiMatteo MR. Depression treatment enhances adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2014;47(3):259–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Defechereux PA, Mehrotra M, Liu AY, McMahan VM, Glidden DV, Mayer KH, Vargas L, Amico KR, Chodacki P, Fernandez T. Depression and oral FTC/TDF pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men and transgender women who have sex with men (MSM/TGW). AIDS Behav. 2016;20(7):1478–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Haberer JE, Bangsberg DR, Baeten JM, Curran K, Koechlin F, Amico KR, Anderson P, Mugo N, Venter F, Goicochea P, et al. Defining success with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a prevention-effective adherence paradigm. AIDS. 2015;29(11):1277–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank study participants, research team members, and physicians and staff at the Maple Leaf Medical Clinic and Toronto General Hospital.


Funding for this work was provided by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)/National Institutes of Health (NIH) (5 UH2 AA026212-02, PI: Shuper). Dr. Shuper’s salary is supported in part by The Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN). The funders were not involved in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



PAS, NJ, IIB, ML, and JR contributed to the conception of the work. PAS, DG, NJ, IIB, and ML were involved in the acquisition of data. PAS, TV, DJK, DG, and NJ were involved in data analysis and interpretation. PAS, TV, DJK, DG, and NJ were involved in drafting the manuscript, and PAS, TV, DJK, DG, NJ, IIB, ML, and JR were involved in the revision and finalization process. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Shuper.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All participants provided informed written consent. Procedures were approved by Research Ethics Boards at the Center for Addiction and Mental Health (Protocol# 101–2018) and the University Health Network (Protocol# 18–5014).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shuper, P.A., Varatharajan, T., Kinitz, D.J. et al. Perceived influence of alcohol consumption, substance use, and mental health on PrEP adherence and condom use among PrEP-prescribed gay, bisexual, and other men-who-have-sex-with-men: a qualitative investigation. BMC Public Health 22, 1875 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
  • Adherence
  • Alcohol
  • Substance Use
  • Mental Health
  • Gay/Bisexual/MSM