Skip to main content
Download PDF

Body image and health-related behaviors among fitspirit participants

BMC Public Health volume 22, Article number: 1764 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Body image variables such as body size perception (BSP) and body size dissatisfaction (BSD) can influence health-related behaviors. However, few studies have investigated these body image variables in adolescent girls participating in a physical activity intervention. Therefore, the study objectives were to examine the 1) associations between health-related behaviors (physical activity, screen-time, eating habits and sleep duration) and BSP and BSD among girls participating in FitSpirit, a physical activity intervention for girls; and 2) influence of weight control practices on the association between health-related behaviors and BSP and BSD.

Methods

This cross-sectional study assessed a sample of 545 adolescent girls (mean age: 15.0±1.5 years) from 240 schools. Body mass index, health-related behaviors, perceived actual body size and desired body size variables were self-reported and collected via an online questionnaire at the end of the FitSpirit intervention. A negative BSP score [perceived actual body size – calculated BMI z-score] indicates an underestimation of body size. A positive BSD score [perceived actual body size – desired body size] indicates a desire to reduce body size. A multiple linear regression analysis examined the effects of age, zBMI and health behaviors on BSP and BSD. A second multiple linear regression analysis examined the independent associations between BSP and BSD by weight control practice. The linear relationships between BSP and BSD were evaluated with Pearson’s correlations.

Results

Underestimation and dissatisfaction of body size are more prevalent in participants living with overweight/obesity. Screen-time and sleep duration were independently associated with BSP score (Beta=0.02; P<0.05 and Beta=-0.07; P<0.05, respectively), whereas only screen-time was associated with the BSD score (Beta=0.07; P<0.001). Physical activity was independently associated with the BSP score only in participants trying to control (maintain) their weight (Beta=-0.18; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Body size overestimation and dissatisfaction are associated with health-related behaviors, specifically with more screen-time and less optimal sleeping habits. Physical activity level does not appear to be associated with body image in girls engaged in a physical activity intervention and who want to lose or gain weight. Health promotion interventions could include screen-time and sleep components as they may influence body image.

Peer Review reports

Background

Research has shown that regular physical activity (PA) and low sedentary time are positively associated with physical, social and mental health [1, 2]. Despite these known benefits, the latest evidence suggests that PA levels decline drastically during the transition from childhood to adolescence, especially in girls, while sedentary time increases considerably [3]. In Canada, only 14% of adolescent girls meet the daily 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous PA recommendations [4] which can be a critical determinant of obesity [5]. Compared to normal weight girls, adolescent girls living with overweight/obesity (OW/OB) are more likely to engage in unhealthy weight control practices [6]. Past research has shown that there is a bidirectional association between body image variables, such as body size perception (BSP) and body size dissatisfaction (BSD), and obesity-related behaviors, including an unhealthy lifestyle and weight control practices [6,7,8].

Several studies suggest that adolescent girls living with OW/OB are more likely to underestimate their body size, which can impact the adoption of certain health behaviors [7, 9]. For example, a previous study conducted in Québec found that 90% of adolescent girls living with OW/OB failed to identify their size compared to 55% of underweight and 13% of those normal weight [10]. Past research has shown that misperception can be an antecedent to healthy and unhealthy behaviors [7]. Body size overestimation is associated with a greater screen-time [11], higher vegetable consumption [12] and unhealthy weight control practices [7]. On the other hand, adolescents who underestimate their body size have a lower level of PA [13] and are less likely to adopt unhealthy weight control practices [14].

There is evidence that body size dissatisfaction is highly prevalent in girls, especially those living with OW/OB [15]. A study in Québec demonstrated that, in adolescent girls, the desire to reduce body size was more present than the desire to increase body size (47% vs. 11%, respectively) [10]. Furthermore, 81% of adolescent girls living with OW/OB reported being dissatisfied with their body size compared to 45% of underweight and 52% of normal weight [10]. The aspiration to reduce body size has been associated with obesity-related behaviors such as poor sleep [16] and low consumption of fruits and vegetables [17]. BSD has also been shown to behave as both a motivation and barrier to PA [18, 19]. For example, it has been reported that individuals with a high BSD may avoid opportunities to exhibit their bodies in a public setting or be exposed to weight criticism during PA [18]. In contrast, it has been shown that some adolescent girls may engage in PA to improve or maintain a desired physical appearance [19]. Body size satisfaction may positively influence health behaviors in this population and protect against harmful weight control practices [20].

Adolescent girls were identified as a target population for several school-based interventions that aimed to increase the practice of PA and reduce screen-time [21,22,23]. Over the past 20 years, many health-promotion initiatives have been implemented to encourage young girls to adopt a healthy and active lifestyle [22, 24]. Through these various interventions, evidence suggests that "girls-only" school-based interventions, such as FitSpirit [25], may be successful approaches to increase PA [21, 26]. However, there are a lack of studies examining the association between body image variables, such as BSP and BSD, and health behaviors in adolescents participating in a "girls-only" school-based intervention.

Examining the association between body image variables and health behaviors is important to better understand this relation and intervene more specifically in “girls-only” school-based interventions. In this context, the first objective of this study was to determine whether health-related behaviors [PA, screen-time, sleep duration and vegetable/fruit consumption], are independently associated with BSP and BSD among FitSpirit participants. The second objective was to investigate the association between BSP and BSD according to weight control practices. Finally, we hypothesized that misperception and dissatisfaction would vary with weight control practices and weight status.

Methods

Participants

The participants of this study took part in FitSpirit, a girls-only school-based intervention designed by a nonprofit organization (FitSpirit.ca). Since 2007, FitSpirit has helped schools organize activities and events for adolescent girls and engages approximately 12 000 participants yearly [27]. FitSpirit aims to raise adolescent girls’ motivation and enjoyment of regular PA by offering them different opportunities to be physically active and thus, promote the adoption of an active lifestyle in the short and long-term [25]. The program offers 4 types of activities to the participants, and each school decides which combination of them they put forward every year: (1) motivational conferences given by inspiring women, (2) weekly physical activity sessions, (3) a running program, and (4) a celebration day at the end of the school year to explore new activities in a non-competitive environment. School group activities are organized and led by a school staff member (FitSpirit leader). The intervention is generally carried out from February to May, but could start earlier. Approximately 250 high schools partner with FitSpirit across two Canadian provinces (Québec and Ontario) every year. The detailed design of this program is described by Leduc et al. [25].

In the Spring of 2018 and 2019, FitSpirit participants from each school engage in the FitSpirit program were invited to participate in the evaluation program [25]. Recruitment was done through the FitSpirit leader who directly invited the girls involved in the FitSpirit program to participate in the program evaluation. FitSpirit participants interested by this evaluation signed an informed consent (n=733). At the end of the school year, which corresponds to the end of the intervention, FitSpirit sent an email inviting these participants to complete an online questionnaire on their experience with the program in French and English. Participants were selected for the present study based on the following criteria in order to have a more heterogeneous sample: aged between 12 and 18 years, normal weight or above for age, and have completed data for BMI, BSP and BSD. Fig. 1 depicts a flowchart of the selected research participants.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study selection process

Full size image

Anthropometric measures

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from self-reported height and weight (kg/m2) and converted to a standardized z-score using age- and sex-specific 2007 WHO growth reference charts for 5-19 years [28]. Scores were used to classify the weight status of adolescents as underweight (zBMI < -2 standard deviation), normal weight (1 > zBMI ≥ -2), overweight (2 > zBMI ≥ 1) or obese (zBMI ≥ 2) [28].

Health-related behaviors

Self-reported PA was measured using the modified version of the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) [29]. First, girls were asked about the total minutes spent on active travel and active leisure in the last seven-day period. Total PA time was calculated as the sum of these two results and then converted to mean minutes per day. Subsequently, screen-time was used as a surrogate measure of sedentary time. The girls self-reported the average time they spent on a typical day, watching TV, playing computer and video games, using a computer (also for homework), cellphone, etc. Thereafter, screen-time was converted to mean hours per day. Next, sleep duration was assessed with a single question asking girls to estimate, on average, how many hours they sleep in 24 hours. Consumption of vegetables and fruits was assessed using adapted questions from a validated self-reported survey [30]. Adolescent girls were asked to estimate how many days per week (0-7) and how many servings per day they consumed vegetables and fruits (not counting juice). In the 2019 form, girls were asked how many FitSpirit activity sessions they have participated during the 4 to 5 months of FitSpirit program 2019.

Current weight control practice was assessed using the questions taken from the Project EAT (Eating and Activity over Time), which was specifically designed to explore eating and weight-related issues among diverse young people across the life course [31]. Participants were asked the following question: Are you currently trying to . . . (1) lose weight or be thinner, (2) control (maintain) weight, (3) gain weight/muscles or be more defined, or (4) I am not trying to do anything about my weight.

Measurements of perceived actual body size and desired body size

BSP and BSD were assessed using the Collins Figure Rating Scale [32], consisting of a series of seven-line drawing figures, ranging from extremely thin to obese with a middle figure representing a normal body size. Girls were asked to select the silhouette they believed was most similar to their own (perceived actual body size) as well as the body figure they most desired to look like (desired body size). We standardized the Collins figure scale for the perceived and desired body size as described by Maximova et al. [33] so that each figure was assigned a corresponding z-score (-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3). Because the silhouettes are correlated with BMI percentiles [34], z-scores of -1, 0 and 1 represent normal body weight, while z-scores of 2 and 3 standard deviations above and below the mean have been associated with the overweight/obese (OW/OB) and underweight categories, respectively.

Following this procedure, the BSP score was calculated as the discrepancy between the perceived actual body size and actual body size (zBMI). According to the method described by Bordeleau et al. [35] using the BSP score, girls were classified into three groups: Underestimators (BSP score < -0.5); Accurate estimators (-0.5 ≤ BSP score ≤ 0.5); and Overestimators (BSP score > 0.5). Similarly, subtracting the desired body size from the perceived body size yielded the BSD score. According to the results obtained, the girls were also classified into three groups: desire to reduce body size (BSD score > 0.5); satisfied (-0.5 ≤ BSD score ≤ 0.5); and desire to increase body size (BSD score < -0.5).

Statistical analyses

Student’s t-test was used to explore the mean of continuous variables, e.g., PA, screen-time, sleep duration and fruit and vegetable consumption, and difference between weight status subgroups. Chi-squared (χ2) tests were used to examine differences in the prevalence of each categorical variable for BSP (accuracy, underestimation and overestimation) and BSD (satisfaction, desire to reduce body size and desire to increase body size). Multiple linear regression models were analyzed to examine the effects of age, zBMI and health behaviors on BSP and BSD scores. Models with the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) were chosen. Girls were then divided into four groups according to their current weight control practice: Trying to lose weight or be thinner, trying to control (maintain) weight, trying to gain weight/muscles or be more defined, and not trying to do anything. A second multiple linear regression analysis examined the association between BSP and BSD by weight control practice. The linear relationship between BSP and BSD according to weight control practices was evaluated with Pearson’s correlations. Finally, Pearson’s correlation analyses investigated the associations between BSP and BSD adjusted for age. Statistical significance was considered at P-value ≤ 0.05. All analyses were performed with SAS OnDemand for Academics (Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Participant characteristics

The mean age for the 545 adolescent girls was 15.0 ± 1.5 years. For the total sample, about 77% were considered normal weight, while 16% were classified as overweight and 7% obese. The descriptive statistics of adolescents’ characteristics are presented by weight status in Table 1. In both the normal weight and OW/OB subgroups, mean perceived actual body size was significantly smaller (p<0.05) than self-reported zBMI (-0.5 ± 1.0 vs. -0.2 ± 0.7 and 0.9 ± 0.8 vs. 1.7 ± 0.7, respectively). Furthermore, mean desired body size was smaller than BSP score in the normal weight subgroup, but higher in the OW/OB subgroup (Table 1). Among the health behaviors, sleep duration was the only one for which there was a significant difference between the weight status subgroups.

Table 1 Characteristics of participants classified by body weight status
Full size table

Body size perception and body size dissatisfaction

Mean BSP score was lower in the OW/OB subgroup, and BSD score was smaller in the normal weight subgroup (Table 1). Moreover, 41% of the girls accurately self-evaluated their body size (“Accurate estimators”), 45% thought they were thinner (“Underestimators”) and 14% thought they were bigger (“Overestimators”) than they were (zBMI). Fig. 2A shows that the prevalence of categorization of BSP was different according to weight status. Underestimation was more prevalent among girls living with OW/OB compared to the normal weight group (56% vs. 41% respectively). Regarding BSD, 34% of the total sample reported being satisfied with their body size, while 55% expressed the desire to reduce their body size and 11% to increase their body size. Fig. 2B shows that 45% of normal-weight girls wanted to reduce their body size while this proportion rose to 92% among the OW/OB subgroup.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of categorization of body size perception (accuracy, underestimation and overestimation) and body size dissatisfaction (satisfaction, desire to reduce body size and desire to increase body size) by weight status (normal weight and overweight/obese) in girls (N=545)

Full size image

Associations between Body size perception, body size dissatisfaction and health-related behaviors

Table 2 presents the effect of age, zBMI and health behaviors [PA, screen-time, sleep duration and vegetable/fruit intake] in BSP and BSD scores. Results revealed that screen-time and sleep duration were independently associated with BSP score (Beta = 0.05, p<0.05; Beta = -0.07, p<0.05, respectively). Screen-time was the only health behavior associated with the BSD score (Beta = 0.07, p<0.001).

Table 2 Contribution of health behaviors on body size perception and dissatisfaction scores
Full size table

Body image and health-related behaviors by weight control practices

In the present study, 56% of the OW/OB subgroup reported trying to lose weight or be thinner while this prevalence was 19% in the normal-weight subgroup. Furthermore, a higher percentage of girls with a normal weight were trying to control (maintain) their weight or gain weight/muscles or be more defined than girls living with OW/OB (31% vs. 22% and 20% vs. 10%; respectively).

As presented in Table 3, PA was only independently associated with BSP score among girls trying to control (maintain) their weight (Beta = -0.18, p<0.05). Thus, each hour of PA among this subgroup of girls was associated with a decrease of -0.18 in the BSP score. In contrast, each serving of fruit/vegetable was associated with a decrease of -0.1 in BSP score in adolescents who reported not engaging in weight control behaviors (Beta = -0.10, p<0.05). Regarding the other health-related behaviors, results vary by weight control behaviors. Screen-time was associated with an increase in BSP and BSD, each hour of screen-time was associated with a 0.12 increase in BSP and 0.06 increase in BSD among girls who have reported trying to control (maintain) their weight (Beta = 0.12, p<0.001 and Beta = 0.06, p<0.05). Screen-time was also independently associated with BSD score among girls who are not trying to do anything with their weight. Thus, each hour of screen-time was associated with an increase of 0.08 in the BSD score (Beta = 0.08, p<0.05). Finally, sleep duration was associated with a decrease of -0.12 in BSP score in adolescents who reported trying to lose weight (Beta = -0.12, p<0.05). Sleep duration is the only health-related behaviors independently associated with BSD score in girls trying to gain weight/muscles or be more defined. Thus, each hour of sleep among this subgroup was associated with an increase of 0.17 in the BSD score (Beta = 0.17, p<0.05).

Table 3 Contribution of health-related behaviors in body size perception and dissatisfaction scores by weight control behaviors
Full size table

Pearson’s correlations were conducted to examine the associations between BSP and BSD scores among participants reporting different weight control practices. Significant positive correlations between BSP and BSD among participants using different weight control practices were observed. However, the correlations by weight status subgroups were not all significant (Fig. 3). Fig. 3A shows significant positive correlations between BSP and BSD scores among girls trying to lose weight or be thinner in the normal and OW/OB subgroups. Moreover, the relationships between BSP and BSD were significantly different between the two subgroups (slope and intercept: p<0.001). In girls trying to control (maintain) their weight (Fig. 3B) and those who are trying to gain weight/muscles or be more defined (Fig. 3C), significant relationships were observed only in normal-weight girls. Finally, Fig. 3D shows significant positive correlations between BSP and BSD scores among girls who are not trying to do anything in the normal and obese subgroups. The relationships between BSP and BSD were significantly different between the two subgroups (slope and intercept: p<0.05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Trying to lose weight or be thinner (A), trying to control (maintain) weight (B), trying to gain weight/muscle or be more defined (C) and not trying to do anything (D)

Full size image

Discussion

Misperception and dissatisfaction of body size are common phenomena among adolescents [10]. Since BSP and BSD can be determinants of health behaviors and unhealthy weight control practices, it is important to question whether or not adolescent girls who engage in PA interventions have a positive body image. In response to these concerns, this study aimed to examine the associations between health-related behaviors, BSP and BSD in girls who participated in a PA promotion intervention and to document the degree to which behaviors are associated with the expression of BSP or BSD. These findings suggest that some health-related behaviors, i.e. screen-time, sleep patterns, are associated with overestimation and dissatisfaction, which may vary depending on weight control practices and weight status.

First, when compared by weight status subgroups the prevalence observed in a population of adolescents from the province of Québec, FitSpirit participants living with OW/OB appeared to assess their weight status more accurately (10% vs. 42%, respectively) while the normal-weight subgroup underestimated their body size (13% vs. 41%, respectively) [10]. Because of the cross-sectional nature of the present study, it is difficult to state whether participation in PA helps to improve accuracy in girls living with OW/OB, but some studies support this hypothesis [36]. One example of that is the study of Gesell et al. (2010), who found that a PA intervention among overweight children improves accuracy of body size perception [37]. A review also demonstrated that the increase in the tendency to underestimate body size may be explained by the “visual normalization theory” [38]. This theory suggests that one’s perception of his/her own body size depends on the size of the bodies this person is frequently exposed to in his/her environment [38]. In the present study, the proportion of adolescents living with OW/OB was higher than in the one carried out in Québec (23% vs. 19%, respectively) [10]. Hence, in FitSpirit, the higher exposure to heavier bodies may explain the greater underestimation of body size among normal weight participants and the more accurate perception among those living with OW/OB. In addition, this difference in prevalence between the two studies could also be explained by a potential selection bias. Adolescents involved in FitSpirit desired to improve their level of PA for different reasons, including reasons related to BSD.

Moreover, our results are in line with previous studies showing that adolescents living with OW/OB report body size dissatisfaction more frequently [10]. However, the present results revealed that girls living with OW/OB reported a higher proportion of the desire to reduce body size than another adolescent girl’s population from Québec (92% vs. 78%, respectively) [10]. This higher proportion could be explained by the context of the studies, including a possible selection bias induced by a higher interest toward PA in our study as well as a potential impact of the intervention itself. In addition, it has been shown that this type of intervention, exclusive to girls, could enhance the comparison of the body between the participants and may lead to a more frequent desire to reduce body size [39].

Regarding health behaviors, screen-time was positively associated with BSP and BSP. Thus, each hour of screen-time was associated with a significant increase of body size overestimation and a desire to reduce body size. Social media such as Instagram occupy an important proportion of screen-time in adolescents girls [40]. The users of these social media platforms are frequently exposed to appearance-highlighting content, including retouched images, leading to unrealistic body ideals [41, 42]. Adolescent girls who fail to meet these standards may view their body concerns increase, which can be related to body size overestimation and dissatisfaction [7, 43, 44]. In line with the meta-analysis results, higher screen-time may be associated with the desire to reduce body size [45].

Furthermore, research revealed that exposure to social media is linked to body dissatisfaction [45]. Higher social media usage increases opportunities for adolescent users to engage in social comparisons as they can compare themselves to their friends, family, influencers and celebrities [46, 47]. A recent study by Scully et al. (2020) suggests that body dissatisfaction increases significantly with time spent on social comparisons [48]. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that screen-time use can delay bedtime, reducing sleep duration in adolescents [49]. Correspondingly, the present study results showed that one hour less of sleep was associated with a body size overestimation. Thus, a possible relationship could exist between screen-time, sleep duration, and overestimation of body size.

Even though PA did not emerge as an independent variable associated with body image, past studies showed that PA could be indirectly related via its association with screen-time and sleep duration. Greater screen-time has been associated with a lower PA [50] while a higher PA has improved sleep duration [51, 52]. In addition, because the current study is cross-section, it is impossible to establish a causal relationship. Considering that the data were collected towards the end of the FitSpirit intervention, the study participants are those who have remained engaged until this moment and therefore, are more inclined to achieve a minimum of PA, which could have impacted the results. Nevertheless, the results of the study suggest that 53% of the participants meet the daily 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous PA recommendation which is higher than what has been found in similar populations [4]. Moreover, we do not have comparative data that would allow us to better analyze the impact of changes in PA on BSP and BSD during the FitSpirit intervention.

Another aim of the present study was to determine if the association between health behaviors with BSP and BSD differed by weight control practices. Results showed that fruit/vegetable consumption was associated with the underestimation of body size in those not trying to control (maintain) their weight. We also found that PA was only associated with underestimation in the subgroup currently trying to control (maintain) weight. This result is consistent with another study among primary school children that observed that girls who perceived themselves as overweight were favorable towards PA to control (maintain) weight [53]. Therefore, it is positive to note that PA level is not associated with BSP and BSD in the other weight control practices. Therefore, PA level is not related to body image variables in girls who are trying to lose weight or be thinner neither among girls trying to gain weight/muscles or be more defined engaged in a PA promotion intervention.

Given that BSP and BSD are influenced by body weight status and weight control practices, understanding the association between these BSP and BSD by body weight status and weight control practice may provide a further understanding of these associations. Accordingly, as observed in Fig. 3, we found significant correlations between BSP and BSD scores according to weight control practices and weight status. A relationship was present in all normal-weight subgroups regardless of the weight control practices. As observed in Fig. 3A, the correlation is similar between the two weight subgroups. However, in Fig. 3D, the correlation is much stronger in adolescent girls living with OW/OB. The positioning suggests that the greater underestimation is associated with body size satisfaction with this group. This result is in line with the study by Bordeleau et al. (2021) conducted among primary school children, where an underestimation in children living with obesity was associated with a lower desire to be thinner [35]. Thus, youth living with OW/OB who underestimate themselves protect themselves from a BSD and unhealthy weight control practices. Moreover, those who reported trying to control (maintain) their weight seemed to be satisfied with their body size and almost all girls living with OW/OB were underestimators. As mentioned, PA was associated with BSP only in girls trying to control (maintain) their weight. Considering that girls were assessed when they were already engaged in the intervention, they may have changed their habit towards PA which could have influenced their body size perception and satisfaction. Thus, although it is possible to note differences between perception and dissatisfaction by body weight status and weight control behaviors, studies are needed to further investigate their relationships and the association with health behaviors in longitudinal studies. Understanding adolescent girl’s BSP and its relationship with BSD is important to help develop interventions that encourage and cultivate a positive (vs. accurate) body image in adolescents of all sizes. Interventions that promote positive body image among adolescent girls should address or consider the role of some health-related behaviors such as screen-time and sleep duration. These interventions should also increase adolescent’s critical thinking around social media and the impact on their body size satisfaction.

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this study include the large number of participants and random selection process from the 240 participating schools. In addition, to our knowledge, no study evaluated the associations between BSP and BSD by weight control behaviors. Study limitations should also be considered when interpreting these findings. First, the cross-sectional design limits the analysis of temporal relationships between body image, health behaviors and weight control practices. Second, the intervention may have attracted girls interested in enhancing their PA level, which may not represent all adolescent girls. Third, FitSpirit is an intervention carried out by a school staff member with different levels of motivation [54], body image self-perceptions, and beliefs around weight control practices which may have influenced health-related behaviors in girls. Fourth, self-reported measurements were used in our study. Previous studies suggest that self-reported height is often overestimated and weight underestimated among adolescent girls [55]. This suggests that the BMI variable used in this study might be lower than measured BMI. Considering this point, it is possible that some girls have identified themselves with a larger figure than the one associated with their reported BMI which would increase the prevalence of overestimation. Nevertheless, overestimation is still trivial in our cohort (i.e., only 14% thought they were bigger “Overestimators”). Adolescents also tend to self-report a higher level of PA [56] which could have impacted the results obtained in the association between PA and body image variables. Finally, another limitation is related to the fact that the program does not have detailed information on program adherence. Of the 545 participants, 54% (n=297) answered the question about how many FitSpirit activities they attended during the program, which is usually from February to May. These activities include motivational conferences, weekly physical activity sessions, and other related events. An average of 12.0 ± 11.6 activities per participant were complete but it is important to consider that no information was provided on the nature, intensity, duration or when the sessions were performed which makes it difficult to assess real adherence to the program. Future research should consider adding social desirability questionnaire and a more objective measure of participation adherence such as using accelerometers to provide measures of PA. An additional limitation derives from the use of the Figural Rating Scale developed by Collins (1991) which considers only two dimensions of BSD (the desire to reduce or increase body size) and does not specifically refer to muscularity. Therefore, further studies should analyze the body size perception and dissatisfaction according to the aspect of muscularity.

Conclusions

Findings from this study provide evidence that body size underestimation and dissatisfaction are common among girls participating in a PA promotion intervention, more specifically among adolescent girls living with OW/OB. The relationship between BSP and BSD scores depends on weight status and weight control practice. Screen-time and sleep duration were independently associated with body size perception whereas only screen-time was associated with body size dissatisfaction. PA was only associated with body size perception in girls trying to control (maintain) their weight, not in those trying to lose or gain body weight. This research is an important step in exploring the association between body image variables and health behaviors. Further work is needed to evaluate the impact of a PA intervention that includes other lifestyle habits such as screen-time and sleep duration. Interventions should also include an educational component to increase girls’ awareness of the negative impact of social media use on body image.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the first author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PA:

Physical activity

BMI:

Body mass index

BSP:

Body size perception

BSD:

Body size dissatisfaction

zBMI:

BMI z-score

OW/OB:

Overweight/obese

References

  1. Hoare E, Milton K, Foster C, Allender S. The associations between sedentary behaviour and mental health among adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;1:108–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0432-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biddle SJH, Ciaccioni S, Thomas G, Vergeer I. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: An updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;42:146–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guimarães RF, Mathieu ME, Reid RER, Henderson M, Barnett TA. Physical Activity, Screen Time, and Sleep Trajectories From Childhood to Adolescence: The Influence of Sex and Body Weight Status. J Phys Act Health. 2021;18(7):767–73. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2020-0389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts KC, Yao X, Carson V, Janssen I, Tremblay MS. Meeting the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth (Health Reports)(Survey). Health Reports. 2017;28(10):3–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Elmesmari R, Martin A, Reilly JJ, Paton JY. Comparison of accelerometer measured levels of physical activity and sedentary time between obese and non-obese children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):106–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1031-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lampard AM, Maclehose RF, Eisenberg ME, Larson NI, Davison KK, Neumark-Sztainer D. Adolescents who engage exclusively in healthy weight control behaviors: Who are they? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):5–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0328-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jankauskiene R, Baceviciene M. Body image concerns and body weight overestimation do not promote healthy behaviour: Evidence from adolescents in Lithuania. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):864–78. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050864.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagata JM, Garber AK, Tabler JL, Murray SB, Bibbins-Domingo K. Differential risk factors for unhealthy weight control behaviors by sex and weight status among US adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2018;63(3):335–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.03.022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Quick V, Nansel TR, Liu D, Lipsky LM, Due P, Iannotti RJ. Body size perception and weight control in youth: 9-year international trends from 24 countries. Int J Obes. 2014;38(7):988–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Traoré I, Julien D, Camirand Hln, Street M-C, Flores J: L’Enquête québécoise sur la santé des jeunes du secondaire 2016–2017. Résultats de la deuxième édition. In., vol. 3: Québec: Institut de la statistique du Québec; 2018. p. 165–94. https://statistique.quebec.ca/fr/fichier/enquete-quebecoise-sur-la-sante-des-jeunes-du-secondaire-2016-2017-resultats-de-la-deuxieme-edition-tome-3-la-sante-physique-et-les-habitudes-de-vie-des-jeunes.pdf.

  11. Lim H, Wang Y. Body weight misperception patterns and their association with health-related factors among adolescents in South Korea Weight Misperception Patterns in Adolescents. Obesity. 2013;21(12):2596–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaclyn BG, Susan SL, Mee Young H. Relationships between body weight perception, body mass index, physical activity, and food choices in Southern California male and female adolescents. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2020;25(1):264–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1614465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khambalia A, Hardy LL, Bauman A. Accuracy of weight perception, life-style behaviours and psychological distress among overweight and obese adolescents. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48(3):220–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02258.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hazzard VM, Hahn SL, Sonneville KR. Weight misperception and disordered weight control behaviors among U.S. high school students with overweight and obesity: Associations and trends, 1999–2013. Eat Behav. 2017;26:189–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinberger NA, Luck-Sikorski C, Riedel-Heller SG, Kersting A. Body Dissatisfaction in Individuals with Obesity Compared to Normal-Weight Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Facts. 2017;9(6):424–41. https://doi.org/10.1159/000454837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Umair A. Sleep associated monitoring on awakening mediates the relationship between cutaneous body image dissatisfaction and insomnia symptoms. Sleep Sci. 2017;2:92–5. https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-0063.20170017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tebar WR, Gil FCS, Scarabottolo CC, Codogno JS, Fernandes RA, Christofaro DGD. Body size dissatisfaction associated with dietary pattern, overweight, and physical activity in adolescents: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Health Sci. 2020;22(3):749–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carmona J, Tornero-Quiñones I, Sierra-Robles Á. Body image avoidance behaviors in adolescence: A multilevel analysis of contextual effects associated with the physical education class. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2015;16(Part 3):70–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Forsén Mantilla E, Levallius J, Monell E, Birgegård A. Exercise Caution: Questions to Ask Adolescents Who May Exercise Too Hard. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(4):797–808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040797.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Loth KA, Watts AW, Van den Berg P, Neumark-Sztainer D. Does Body Satisfaction Help or Harm Overweight Teens? A 10-Year Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Body Satisfaction and Body Mass Index. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57(5):559–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pearson NP, Braithwaite RED, Biddle SJHP. The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Physical Activity Among Adolescent Girls: A Meta-analysis. Acad Pediatr. 2015;15(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2014.08.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Owen MB, Curry WB, Kerner C, Newson L, Fairclough SJ. The effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions for adolescent girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev med. 2017;105:237–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van de Kop JH, Van Kernebeek WG, Otten RHJ, Toussaint HM, Verhoeff AP. School-Based Physical Activity Interventions in Prevocational Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. J Adolesc Health. 2019;65(2):185–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.02.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pearson N, Braithwaite R, Biddle SJ. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity among adolescent girls: a meta-analysis. Acad Pediatr. 2015;15(1):9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leduc G, Gilbert J-A, Ayotte A, Moreau N, Drapeau V, Lemoyne J, Monthuy-Blanc J, Tremblay J, Mathieu M-E. The FitSpirit approach for increasing physical activity in canadian teenage girls: protocol of a longitudinal, quasi-experimental study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):229–37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10200-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Guimarães RF, Gilbert JA, Lemoyne J, Mathieu M-E. Better health indicators of FitSpirit participants meeting 24-h movement guidelines for Canadian children and youth. Health Promot Int. 2020;36(3):836–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa102.

  27. Guimarães RF, Gilbert JA, Mathieu ME, Drapeau V.Healthier Lifestyle for Girls Who Accumulate More Years in the FitSpirit School-Based Intervention. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2020. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827620964764.

  28. Onis Md, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:660–7. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.07.043497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pica L, Traoré I, Bernèche F, Laprise P, Cazale L, Camirand H, Berthelot M, Plante N: L’Enquête québécoise sur la santé des jeunes du secondaire 2010–2011. Le visage des jeunes d’aujourd’hui: leur santé physique et leurs habitudes de vie. In.: Québec: Institut de la statistique du Québec; 2012. https://statistique.quebec.ca/en/fichier/enquete-quebecoise-sur-la-sante-des-jeunes-du-secondaire-2010-2011-le-visage-des-jeunes-d-aujourdhui-leur-sante-physique-et-leurs-habitudes-de-vie-tome-1.pdf.

  31. Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Hannan PJ, Perry CL, Irving LM. Weight-related concerns and behaviors among overweight and nonoverweight adolescents: implications for preventing weight-related disorders. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(2):171–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.156.2.171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Collins ME. Body figure perceptions and preferences among preadolescent children. Int J Eat Disord. 1991;10(2):199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Maximova K, McGrath JJ, Barnett T, Loughlin JO, Paradis G, Lambert M. Do you see what I see? Weight status misperception and exposure to obesity among children and adolescents. Int J Obes. 2008;32:1008–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Peterson M, Ellenberg D, Crossan S. Body-image perceptions: reliability of a BMI-based Silhouette Matching Test. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27(4):355–63. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.27.4.7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bordeleau M, Leduc G, Blanchet C, Drapeau V, Alméras N. Body Size Misperception and Dissatisfaction in Elementary School Children. Child Obes. 2021;17(7):467–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2020.0221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mahat G, Zha P. Body weight perception and physical activity among young adults: Analysis from the national longitudinal study of adolescent to adult health. J Am Coll Health. 2022;70(4):1257–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1791881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gesell SB, Scott TA, Barkin SL. Accuracy of perception of body size among overweight Latino preadolescents after a 6-month physical activity skills building intervention. Clin Pediat. 2010;49(4):323–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922809339386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Robinson E. Overweight but unseen: a review of the underestimation of weight status and a visual normalization theory Weight Status Misperceptions. Obes Rev. 2017;18(10):1200–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12570.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Heinberg LJ, Thompson JK. Social comparison: Gender, target importance ratings, and relation to body image disturbance. J Soc Behav Pers. 1992;7(2):335–44.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Twenge JM, Farley E. Not all screen time is created equal: associations with mental health vary by activity and gender. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021;56(2):207–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01906-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rodgers RF, Melioli T. The relationship between body image concerns, eating disorders and internet use, part I: A review of empirical support. Adolesc Res Rev. 2016;1(2):95–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-015-0016-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rodgers RF, Slater A, Gordon CS, McLean SnA, Jarman HK, Paxton SJ. A biopsychosocial model of social media use and body image concerns, disordered eating, and muscle-building behaviors among adolescent girls and boys. J Youth Adolesc. 2020;49(2):399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01190-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jiotsa B, Naccache B, Duval Ml, Rocher B, Grall-Bronnec M. Social Media Use and Body Image Disorders: Association between frequency of comparing one’s own physical appearance to that of people being followed on social media and body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):2880–94. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062880.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Tebar WR, Canhin DS, Colognesi LAn, Morano AEvA, Silva DTC, Christofaro DGD.Body dissatisfaction and its association with domains of physical activity and of sedentary behavior in a sample of 15,632 adolescents. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2019-0241.

  45. Grabe S, Ward LM, Hyde JS. The role of the media in body image concerns among women: a meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychol Bull. 2008;134(3):460–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lowe-Calverley E, Grieve R. Do the metrics matter? An experimental investigation of Instagram influencer effects on mood and body dissatisfaction. Body Image. 2021;36:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brown Z, Tiggemann M. Attractive celebrity and peer images on Instagram: Effect on women’s mood and body image. Body Image. 2016;19:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Scully M, Swords L, Nixon E.Social comparisons on social media: online appearance-related activity and body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls. Ir J Psychol Med. 2020:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2020.93.

  49. Hisler G, Twenge JM, Krizan Z. Associations between screen time and short sleep duration among adolescents varies by media type: evidence from a cohort study. Sleep Med. 2020;66:92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2019.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Graham DJ, Bauer KW, Friend S, Barr-Anderson DJ, Nuemark-Sztainer D. Personal, Behavioral, and Socioenvironmental Correlates of Physical Activity Among Adolescent Girls: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(1):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2011-0239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Saidi O, Rochette E, Bovet M, Merlin E, Duché P. Acute intense exercise improves sleep and decreases next morning consumption of energy-dense food in adolescent girls with obesity and evening chronotype. Pediatr Obes. 2020;15(6):12613–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Banno M, Harada Y, Taniguchi M, Tobita R, Tsujimoto H, Tsujimoto Y, Kataoka Y, Noda A. Exercise can improve sleep quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ. 2018;6:5172–95. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang, Zhai J, Feng Y, Li XQ, Lyu WR, Astell-Burt YB, Zhao T, Shi PY.Gender Differences in the Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity, Associated Behaviors, and Weight-related Perceptions in a National Survey of Primary School Children in China. Biomed Environ Sci. 2018 31,(1):1-11https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2018.001.

  54. Abdullah G, Rossy D, Ploeg J, Davies B, Higuchi K, Sikora L, Stacey D. Measuring the effectiveness of mentoring as a knowledge translation intervention for implementing empirical evidence: a systematic review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2014;11(5):284–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12060.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Seijo M, Minckas N, Cormick G, Comandé D, Ciapponi An, BelizÁn JM. Comparison of self-reported and directly measured weight and height among women of reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(4):429–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shiely F, MacDonncha C. Meeting the international adolescent physical activity guidelines: a comparison of objectively measured and self-reported physical activity levels. Ir Med J. 2009;102(1):15–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the co-researchers who participated in the development of the project and the questionnaire - Jonathan Tremblay: Associate Professor and researcher, École de kinésiologie et des sciences de l’activité physique de la Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal. Martin Juneau: Cardiologist, Researcher and Director of prevention at the Montreal Heart Institute (MHI). Associate Professor at the Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal. Director of the Center for Preventive Medicine and Physical Activity (Center ÉPIC). Jean Lemoyne: Associate Professor and researcher, Département des sciences de l’activité physique, Université de Trois-Rivières. Nicolas Moreau: Associate Professor and researcher, Faculté des sciences sociales, École de service social, Université d’Ottawa.

We thank the FitSpirit organization for its collaboration. We thank all girls, school leaders, FitSpirit ambassadors, coordinators and school boards involved in the intervention. We acknowledge Serge Simard and Christian Couture for providing statistical support.

Funding

The study is co-funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and by the FitSpirit organization. We would also like to express our gratitude to the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval (IUCPQ-UL), Québec City, Québec, Canada

    Manon Bordeleau, Natalie Alméras & Vicky Drapeau

  2. Department of Physical Education, Université Laval, Québec, Québec City, Canada

    Manon Bordeleau, Joël Gagnon & Vicky Drapeau

  3. Centre de recherche interuniversitaire sur la formation et profession enseignante (CRIFPE), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Manon Bordeleau & Vicky Drapeau

  4. Centre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada

    Manon Bordeleau & Vicky Drapeau

  5. École de kinésiologie et des sciences de l’activité physique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Jo-Anne Gilbert & Marie-Ève Mathieu

  6. Sainte-Justine University Health Center, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Jo-Anne Gilbert & Marie-Ève Mathieu

  7. Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada

    Natalie Alméras

  8. GR2TCA-Loricorps, Groupe de Recherche Transdisciplinaire des Troubles du Comportement Alimentaire, Department of Education Sciences, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada

    Johana Monthuy-Blanc

  9. Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Québec, Montréal, Canada

    Johana Monthuy-Blanc

Authors
  1. Manon Bordeleau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jo-Anne Gilbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natalie Alméras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johana Monthuy-Blanc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joël Gagnon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marie-Ève Mathieu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vicky Drapeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

VD, MEM, JMB conceptualized and designed the study. VD, MEM, JMB contributed to data collection. MB, VD, NA analyzed and interpreted the data. MB prepared figures and drafted manuscript. JG, VD, NA edited and revised manuscript and all authors contributed to reviewing and developing the final manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. “The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.”

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicky Drapeau.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research project has been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval was obtained from the Comité d’éthique de la recherche en santé of the Université de Montréal (CERES, #16160, 21/12/2016) and Université Laval (#2018-331). In the Province of Québec, parental consent is required for children under 14 with their assent. In the case of project with very low risk, it is authorized to ask only for the consent of youth aged 14 years and older. Thus, all participants and their parents (for participants 13 years and younger) provided parental written informed consent and youth's assent. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Information about the purpose of the study and consent form were distributed to the participants see https://fillactive.com/ for complete information regarding the project recruitment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bordeleau, M., Gilbert, JA., Alméras, N. et al. Body image and health-related behaviors among fitspirit participants. BMC Public Health 22, 1764 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14131-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14131-7

Keywords

  • Body size perception
  • Body size dissatisfaction
  • Healthy habits
  • Physical activity
  • Adolescent girls
  • Health behaviors
  • Self-perception
  • Obesity

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us