Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clusters of preterm live births and respiratory distress syndrome-associated neonatal deaths: spatial distribution and cooccurrence patterns

BMC Public Health volume 22, Article number: 1226 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Prematurity and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) are strongly associated. RDS continues to be an important contributor to neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify clusters of preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal deaths, and their cooccurrence pattern in São Paulo State, Brazil, between 2004 and 2015. 

Methods

Population-based study of all live births with gestational age ≥ 22 weeks, birthweight ≥ 400 g, without congenital anomalies from mothers living in São Paulo State, Brazil, during 2004–2015. RDS-associated neonatal mortality was defined as deaths < 28 days with ICD-10 codes P22.0 or P28.0. RDS-associated neonatal mortality and preterm live births rates per municipality were submitted to first- and second-order spatial analysis before and after smoothing using local Bayes estimates. Spearman test was applied to identify the correlation pattern between both rates.

Results

Six hundred forty-five thousand two hundred seventy-six preterm live births and 11,078 RDS-associated neonatal deaths in São Paulo State, Brazil, during the study period were analyzed. After smoothing, a non-random spatial distribution of preterm live births rate (I = 0.78; p = 0.001) and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate (I = 0.73; p = 0.001) was identified. LISA maps confirmed clusters for both, with a negative correlation (r = -0.24; p = 0.0000). Clusters of high RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates overlapping with clusters of low preterm live births rates were detected.

Conclusions

Asymmetric cluster distribution of preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal deaths may be helpful to indicate areas for perinatal healthcare improvement.

Peer Review reports

Background

Approximately 15 million preterm births occur per year worldwide, representing 11% of the total yearly births. Around 1 million deaths per year occur in infants born with gestational age < 37 weeks [1], and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is one of the most frequent causes of death in this group [2]. In the United States, RDS prevalence was 361 per thousand live births with gestational age less than 34 weeks, in 2014 [3]. This incidence is inversely proportional to gestational age, occurring in 86% of infants with 28 weeks and in 98% of those with 24 weeks [4].

Over the years, higher survival rates of preterm infants with RDS have been observed in high income countries, driven by management advances [3,4,5], including the reduction of RDS frequency and/or its severity by peripartum care with antenatal corticosteroids, and minimization of the disease consequences with surfactant administration and respiratory support strategies, all highly related to the quality of neonatal care [5, 6]. Despite these advances, RDS management practices vary among regions influenced by health care accessibility, local or regional health policies, and health infrastructure [7, 8]. In this context, RDS is still associated with unfavorable outcome in very low birth weight infants [9], and it is considered an independent risk factor for neonatal death among preterm infants in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) [10].

In Brazil, an upper middle-income country [11], RDS rate among infants with 24–34 weeks of gestational age delivered in tertiary centers located in the South, Southeast, and Northeast regions of the country, was 49.8% in 2011–2013 [12]. Considering the period of 2011–2017 in a single center of a Southern Brazilian State, RDS occurred in 4.2% of preterm infants with 36 weeks of gestational age, and in 100% of those with 22 weeks [13]. In centers that participated in the Brazilian Surfactant Collaborative Group, RDS-mortality among preterm infants was 33 to 40% in 2005/2006, reaching 14 to 21% for those with birthweight between 1000 and 1499 g, and 68% of those < 750 g [14].

São Paulo State is the richest, most populous, and urbanized subnational Brazilian entity, with good socioeconomic indicators, but important social and economic inequities [15]. In 2010, the average per capita income among São Paulo State municipalities varied almost 18 times and 16.5% of the population lived in a situation of high social vulnerability, with discrepancies in education, housing conditions, access to primary health care [16, 17], and qualified perinatal care, which have important impact on neonatal mortality [18]. In 2006–2010, the neonatal mortality rate among São Paulo State municipalities varied between 6.9 and 16.9 per thousand live births [19], however, the study of cause specific neonatal deaths, particularly of RDS-associated neonatal deaths, is scarce for the state and its municipalities.

Considering RDS incidence and mortality among preterm infants [13, 14], and the neonatal mortality variation across the state [19], it is possible that the distribution of RDS-associated neonatal deaths in preterm live births also varies among São Paulo State municipalities. Identification of these variations in RDS-associated neonatal mortality throughout the state may help to design public health policies for the prevention and management of the disease, contributing to decrease the burden of prematurity as a cause of neonatal deaths across the State.

Given this scenario, this study aimed to identify clusters of preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal deaths and their cooccurrence pattern in São Paulo State, Brazil, between 2004 and 2015.

Methods

This is a population-based study of live births with gestational age ≥ 22 weeks, birthweight ≥ 400 g, and without congenital anomalies registered in the birth or in the death certificate, from mothers living in São Paulo State, Brazil, between 2004 and 2015. São Paulo State has 645 substate divisions (or municipalities) that contain 41,262,199 inhabitants, which represents more than a half of the total population living in the Southeast region of Brazil [15]. São Paulo State and its municipalities’ location in Brazil and America are showed in Fig. 1. The American continent map and geographic coordinates and spatial files of São Paulo State and the respective municipalities in shape format (.shp) were obtained from the “Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística” (IBGE) [20].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Location of São Paulo State and its municipalities in Brazil, and America. A American Continent; B Brazil; C São Paulo State and its municipalities 

Full size image

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidade Federal de São Paulo, under the number 4.055.489, with informed consent waive (unidentified database).

The data were extracted from two databases of Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados (SEADE Foundation), one containing the deaths certificates and the other the live births certificates information covering 99.8% and 99.5% of all occurrences in the State, respectively [21]. SEADE Foundation made the deterministic linkage of death and live birth records to identify the birth information for all infants who died within 365 days after birth [22]. To adapt the data set to the study design, a final database was created by integrating the birth variables common among the neonatal death records, retrieved from the linked database, with the live birth records [23].

The following definitions were used: preterm live births: live births with gestational age < 37 weeks; neonatal death: any death occurring between 0 and 27 days after birth; RDS-associated neonatal death: any neonatal death with the following ICD 10 codes in any line of the Death Certificate: P22.0 (respiratory distress syndrome of newborn) or P28.0 (primary atelectasis of newborn) [24]; preterm live birth rate: number of preterm live births per thousand live births; and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate: number of RDS-associated neonatal deaths per thousand preterm live births.

The demographic characteristics considered for preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal deaths from 2004 to 2015 were: gestational age (stratified as 220/7–276/7, 280/7–316/7 and 320/7–366/7 weeks), birthweight (< 1500 g and ≥ 1500 g), sex (male or female), 5th minute Apgar score (< 7 and ≥ 7), maternal age (< 20, 20–34 and ≥ 35 years), maternal schooling (≤ 7 or > 7 years of study), parity (primiparous and multiparous), number of prenatal care visits (< 4 and ≥ 4), pregnancy type (single or multiple), delivery mode (vaginal or cesarean section), and place of delivery (hospital or other). For RDS-associated neonatal deaths, age of death was evaluated. Municipality of maternal residence, municipality of infants’ birth and neonatal deaths were analyzed, considering the 645 municipalities of São Paulo State.

Initially, crude rates of preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal mortality per municipality were mapped. Preterm live births crude rates were calculated by dividing the number of preterm live births by the total number of live births included (by municipality). For RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates, calculation was based on the total RDS-associated neonatal deaths divided by total preterm live births (by municipality). Then, to evaluate spatial autocorrelation presence, maps were generated and hierarchically analyzed by first- and second-order effects. First-order effects were visually explored for clusters by spatial moving average [25] of preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates per municipality. Following, the same rates were explored for second-order effects by Global Moran Indicators (I), that measures spatial autocorrelation among all municipalities in study, and tests the null hypothesis of random distribution of observed values. Results are shown in the range of -1 to + 1 and considered significant if p < 0.05. Significance was analyzed using 999 random permutations by Monte Carlo permutation. Null results (I = 0; p < 0.05) suggest random distribution; positive values (I > 0; p < 0.05) suggest non-random distribution with positive spatial autocorrelation (similarity among municipalities rates); and negative results (I < 0; p < 0.05) suggest non-random distribution with negative spatial autocorrelation (dissimilarity among municipalities rates). If first- or second-order effects suggested the presence of spatial autocorrelation, a smoothing technique with local empiric Bayesian estimator was applied in order to reduce the impact of outlier areas [25, 26]. Then, Global Moran Indicators were applied after a smoothing procedure to test the spatial autocorrelations of the adjusted rates. Finally, if spatial autocorrelation was found, Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) cluster maps were generated to locate clusters of municipalities with similar values. LISA was analyzed using 9,999 random permutations by Monte Carlo permutation for assessing the significance of rate correlation. Clusters of preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal mortality in the São Paulo State were then considered if LISA cluster maps showed correlation of rates between municipalities greater than 95% [27]. All spatial analysis tools are included in the software package (TerraView® version 5.5.0, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, São José dos Campos, Brazil).

Finally, Spearman test was applied to explore the correlation between preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates for all municipalities, and a map overlapping the clusters of both rates (i.e., preterm live births rate and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate) identified in each specific LISA cluster map after smoothing was generated.

All analytical procedures were performed using Stata 15.1® (StataCorp LLC, Texas, USA) and TerraView® software version 5.5.0 (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, São José dos Campos, Brazil).

Results

From 2004 to 2015, there were 7,317,611 live births in São Paulo State, Brazil (Fig. 2). Among 7,030,237 live births ≥ 22 weeks of gestational age, ≥ 400 g, and without congenital anomalies, 645,276 (9.2%) were preterm live births.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flowchart of the studied population. BW Birthweight, GA Gestational age, RDS Respiratory distress syndrome

Full size image

Most neonatal and maternal demographic variables were almost fully available, with the exception of maternal schooling, parity, prenatal care visits, and 5th minute Apgar score (Table 1). Among all preterm live births, 640,955 (99.3%) were delivered in hospitals. Among infants that died with RDS, the death occurred at a mean time of 48 (P25-75: 16–120) hours after birth.

Table 1 Preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal deaths demographic characteristics, São Paulo state, Brazil, 2004–2015 
Full size table

For the spatial analysis, 37 preterm live births were excluded due to unknown municipality code. Considering all RDS-associated neonatal deaths, delivery and death occurred in the same maternal residence municipality for 7,890 (71.2%) preterm live births. In 2,763 (24.9%) RDS-associated neonatal deaths, delivery and death occurred in the same municipality, but these were different from maternal residence municipality. In the other 425 (3.9%) RDS-associated neonatal deaths, there were different combinations of municipalities of maternal residency, infant’s birth, and death.

For all 645 São Paulo state municipalities, the mean preterm birth rate during 12-year study period was 86.9 per thousand live births, with crude rates varying from 41.1 to 149.8 per thousand live births, and from 64.1 to 132.4 for spatial moving average. The Global Moran indicator suggested a non-random distribution (I = 0.44; p = 0.001) of preterm live birth rates across the State. After smoothing, the mean preterm live births rate for all 645 São Paulo state municipalities was 88.8 per thousand live births (range: 57.0 to 131.0) (Additional file 1), and the Global Moran indicator confirmed the presence of clusters of preterm live births (I = 0.78; p = 0.001). Lisa Cluster Map showed clusters of high preterm live births rates in Northwest and Midwest regions of the state and in São Paulo City Metropolitan region (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of preterm live birth and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates. Data from 645 municipalities after smoothing using local Bayes estimate. A Lisa Cluster Map of preterm live births rates; B Lisa Cluster Map of RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates

Full size image

Across the 645 municipalities studied, the mean RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate was 16.2 per thousand preterm live births. The crude rate was zero in 149 (23.1%) municipalities of São Paulo State. In the other 496 municipalities, it varied from 1.9 to 95.2 per thousand preterm live births. Spatial moving average varied from 2.3 to 57.0. Evidence of non-random distribution of RDS-associated neonatal death rates was confirmed by the Global Moran indicator (I = 0.28; p = 0.002). After smoothing, the mean RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate for the 645 São Paulo state municipalities was 16.5 per thousand preterm live births (range 3.8 to 62.7) (Additional file 2). The Global Moran indicator confirmed the presence of clusters of RDS-associated neonatal mortality (I = 0.73; p = 0.001) and the Lisa Cluster Map found clusters of high RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate in Northeast, Central Coast, Southeast, and West regions of São Paulo State (Fig. 3B).

Spearman rank correlation (r) test applied for all municipalities’ rates showed a significant negative correlation between preterm live births rates and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates (r = -0.24; p = 0.0000) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Spearman rank correlation of preterm live birth rates versus RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates

Full size image

The overlapping of clusters identified in specific LISA cluster maps after smoothing for preterm live births rates and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates allowed the identification of 3 municipalities with high rates for both; 34 with low rates for both; 38 with low preterm live birth rate and high RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate; and 55 with high preterm live birth rate and low RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Map with asymmetries of clusters between preterm live birth rates and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates

Full size image

Discussion

This population-based study with a large database evaluated the spatial pattern of preterm live births rate and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate within a highly relevant sub-national area, i.e., São Paulo State, Brazil, during a 12-year period. Across the state, a significant negative correlation between preterm live birth rate and RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate was identified, with areas of high preterm live births and low RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates, and areas with high RDS-associated neonatal mortality rate despite low preterm live births rate.

Given the strong association between prematurity and RDS, and the impact of RDS-associated neonatal mortality among preterm live births in LMIC [6, 28], it was expected an overlap of areas with high preterm live births and high RDS-associated neonatal deaths and areas with low preterm live births and low RDS-associated mortality deaths. The asymmetries shown in our study between preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal deaths raise questions about the role of factors such as neonatal intensive care volume of admissions, neonatal team expertise, and integrated and effective regionalization policies for the care of preterm neonates in RDS-associated mortality [29,30,31,32,33].

Higher preterm live birth rates and lower RDS-associated neonatal mortality rates were found in the Northwest municipalities of São Paulo State, which is a region with good health indicators [34]. Northwest region has large referral centers for neonatal care and specialized teaching hospitals, with availability of neonatal intensive care beds and professional expertise [35]. Although the present study did not evaluate preterm hospitalizations, it has already been demonstrated that almost 95% of preterm live births < 34 weeks of gestational age require specialized neonatal intensive care and admission rates increase in lower gestational ages [36]. Thus, it should be expected that areas with higher preterm live births have higher hospitalization rates; the opposite also being true. In addition, higher volume of hospital admissions of high-risk preterm newborn infants has previously been associated with positive impacts in outcomes of preterm live births [37, 38]. Volume of specialized care impacts on expertise of professional teams, and efficiency of management strategies [34, 35], reducing neonatal respiratory failure and RDS-specific mortality [6, 35].

Areas with high rates of RDS-associated neonatal mortality and low preterm live birth rates found in the Northeast, Southeast, and West regions of São Paulo State could result from an inadequate regionalization process. Financial inequities, healthcare fragmentation, disproportion in hospital beds availability [29, 39], and inefficient care showed in some municipalities could impair the regionalization process [40] and the perinatal outcomes [30].

A lack of integration among healthcare levels, with deficiencies in the referral system and in regional guideline implementations, may result in maternal decisions to have the delivery in specific hospitals based on their location or on local technology availability [29, 37, 41]. In Brazil, a study done from 2011–2014 showed that wandering of women in labor in order to find a place to give birth increased the chance of neonatal death in 4.89 times [42]. Wandering was related to the lack of perinatal healthcare organization, with the absence of a pre-assignment hospital to give birth during prenatal care, and with the lack of place or lack of resources for high-risk births [42, 43]. Birth in places without the appropriate technology to promote initial care accounts for 50% of deaths in very low birth weight preterm infants [42], with a negative impact on cause-specific mortality [41, 44].

Areas with high RDS-associated neonatal mortality are also concentrated in regions characterized by the highest rates of social vulnerability and lower socioeconomic status, with younger mothers, lower maternal schooling, and lower prenatal care visits [17, 45]. All these factors are probably associated with higher neonatal mortality rates due to factors that include a poorer access to appropriate newborn care interventions [46] and to RDS good practices management strategies, contributing to RDS-associated neonatal deaths [6].

Despite the evidence that RDS prevention (prevention of prematurity and use of antenatal corticosteroids) and treatment (surfactant, appropriate oxygen and ventilatory strategies and quality of intensive care) combined have the potential to prevent 42% of RDS-associated deaths in low-income countries [5, 6, 47, 48], these practices vary among Brazilian neonatal centers. Data from Brazilian Network on Neonatal Research, with 20 public university hospitals across the country, show that antenatal administration of steroids ranged from 59 to 95% in 2015 between centers and surfactant was given to around 55% of the 1,486 infants evaluated [49]. The inconsistency of RDS management practices could contribute to the pattern of the RDS-associated neonatal deaths in São Paulo State.

The present study has some limitations. The database used in this analysis is provided by SEADE Foundation after linkage and anonymization, a process that has a manual component and is time consuming. Therefore, the most recent year available to the study was 2015. This populational database does not allow the analysis of socioeconomic and health indicators associated with preterm live births rate and RDS-associated mortality rate. The contribution of RDS to the death process of preterm infants with RDS-associated deaths notified in the death certificates could not be evaluated. Furthermore, spatial analysis was based on the smallest area available for each dataset within the state (i.e., municipality) and that may have masked spatial inequalities that would be captured in smaller units regarding social and health inequities for preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal mortality. Although valuable, this approach certainly does not consider intra-area variability and it is influenced by areas with rare events, which could lead to extreme high or low rates [26]. To overcome this limitation, the 12-year period events were aggregated, and a spatial smoothing Bayesian approach was used.

Despite these limitations, this study is one of the first to provide a picture of RDS-associated neonatal deaths distribution in a middle-income country, offering a better understanding of perinatal care in São Paulo State. The results may be used to improve the design of public health strategies, focused on access and quality of antenatal care and maternal referral to centers with qualified professionals and resources for assisting preterm infants. Therefore, this population-based study adds information to map strengths and frailties of neonatal care in the richest sate of Brazil and information is key to planning ways to achieve the Sustained Developmental Goals until 2035 [50]. The analytical approach used in this study may be replicated and help to subsidize discussions on global inequities in neonatal health care.

Conclusions

The present study identified across São Paulo State, Brazil, clusters of preterm live births and RDS-associated neonatal deaths, with a negative correlation between both rates, suggesting asynchrony in perinatal healthcare. The occurrence of clusters with high preterm live births and low RDS-associated neonatal deaths may be interpreted as referral areas for perinatal healthcare. Clusters of low preterm live births and high RDS-associated neonatal deaths suggest the need for public health attention to improve perinatal maternal and neonatal care.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

FAPESP:

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

SEADE:

Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados

IBGE:

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística

ICD:

International Classification of Diseases

LISA:

Local Indicators of Spatial Association

LMIC:

Low- and middle-income countries

RDS:

Respiratory distress syndrome

GA:

Gestational age

BW:

Birthweight

References

  1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller AB, et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013;10(Suppl 1):S2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Muhe LM, McClure EM, Nigussie AK, Mekasha A, Worku B, Worku A, et al. Major causes of death in preterm infants in selected hospitals in Ethiopia (SIP): a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(8):e1130–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30220-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Donda K, Vijayakanthi N, Dapaah-Siakwan F, Bhatt P, Rastogi D, Rastogi S. Trends in epidemiology and outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome in the United States. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019;54(4):405–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Walsh MC, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010;126(3):443–56. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McPherson C, Wambach JA. Prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm neonates. Neonatal Netw. 2018;37(3):169–77. https://doi.org/10.1891/0730-0832.37.3.169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamath BD, MacGuire ER, McClure EM, Goldenberg RL, Jobe AH. Neonatal mortality from respiratory distress syndrome: lessons for low-resource countries. Pediatrics. 2011;127(6):1139–46. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barcellos CC, Sabroza PC, Peiter P, Rojas LI. Spatial organization, health and quality of life: use of spatial analysis and indicators in health situation analysis. Informe Epidemiológico do SUS. 2002;11(3):129–38.

    Google Scholar 

  8. United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UNIGME). Levels and trends in child mortality report 2019. Estimates developed by the UN inter-agency group for child mortality estimation; 2019. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/reports/levels-and-trends-child-mortality-report-2019. Accessed 20 Sept 2020.

  9. Guinsburg R, De Almeida MFB, De Castro JS, Silveira RC, Caldas JPS, Fiori HH, et al. Death or survival with major morbidity in VLBW infants born at Brazilian neonatal research network centers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(6):1005–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1031740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Almeida MF, Guinsburg R, Martinez FE, Procianoy RS, Leone CR, Marba STM, et al. Perinatal factors associated with early deaths of preterm infants born in Brazilian Network on Neonatal Research centers. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008;84(4):300–7. https://doi.org/10.2223/JPED.1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization (WHO). Country classification; 2014. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wesp/wesp_current/2014wesp_country_classification.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2021.

  12. Ramos CNP. Utilização do surfactante na doença de membrana hialina em recém-nascidos prematuros no Sistema Único de Saúde. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira; 2016. Available from: https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/bitstream/icict/25227/2/carla_ramos_iff_mest_2016.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2021.

  13. De Almeida B, Couto RHM, Trapano JA. Prevalence and factors associated with death in interned prematures. Arq Catarin Med. 2019;48(4):35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rebello CM, Precioso AR, Mascaretti RS, GrupoColaborativo do EstudoBrasileiroMulticêntrico de Surfactante. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of a new porcine surfactant in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Einstein. 2014;12(4):397–404. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082014AO3095.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Censo demográfico 2010 – resultados gerais da amostra; 2012. [Internet]. Available from: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/99/cd_2010_resultados_gerais_amostra.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2020.

  16. Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados (SEADE). Índice paulista de vulnerabilidade social; 2010. [Internet]. Available from: http://ipvs.seade.gov.br/view/index.php. Accessed 2 Apr 2022.

  17. Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados (SEADE). Índice paulista de responsabilidade social; 2010. [Internet]. Available from: https://iprs.seade.gov.br/?serie=1&ano=2010#. Accessed 4 Apr 2022.

  18. de Andrade CLT, Szwarcwald CL, da Gama SGN, Leal MC. Socioeconomic inequalities and low birth weight and perinatal mortality in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20(Suppl 1):S44–51. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2004000700005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Almeida MCS, Gomes CMS, Nascimento LFC. Spatial analysis of neonatal mortality in the state of São Paulo, 2006–2010. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2014;32(4):374–80. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-05822014000400014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Bases e referências. Malhas digitais; 2019. [Internet]. Available from: https://mapas.ibge.gov.br/bases-e-referenciais.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  21. Waldvogel BC, Ferreira CEC, Camargo ABM, Jordani MS, Flores LPO. Base unificada de nascimentos e óbitos no Estado de São Paulo: instrumento para aprimorar os indicadores de saúde. São Paulo em Perspectiva. 2008;22(1):5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Waldvogel BC, Morais LCC, Perdigão ML, Teixeira MLP, Freitas RMV, Aranha VJ. Experiência da Fundação Seade com a aplicação da metodologia de vinculação determinística de bases de dados. Ensaio Conjuntura. 2019;1:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Areco KN, Konstantyner T, Bandiera-Paiva P, Balda RCX, Costa-Nobre DT, Sanudo A, et al. Operational challenges in the use of structured secondary data for health research. Front Public Health. 2021;15(9):642163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.642163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization (WHO). ICD-10: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, tenth revision, 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.

  25. Bailey T, Gatrell AC. Interactive spatial data analysis. New York: Longman Scientific & Technical J Wiley; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Banerjee S. Spatial data analysis. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:47–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geogr Anal. 1995;27(2):93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hubbard RM, Choudhury KM, Lim G. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in neonates diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome in a low-income country: A report from Bangladesh. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(5):1684–6. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002865.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Viana ALD, Ferreira MP, Cutrim MA, Fusaro ER, Souza MR, Mourão L, et al. The regionalization process in Brazil: influence on policy, structure and organization dimensions. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil. 2017;17(Suppl 1):S27–43. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9304201700S100003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kunz SN, Phibbs CS, Profit J. The changing landscape of perinatal regionalization. Semin Perinatol. 2020;44(4):151241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma L, Liu C, Cheah I, Yeo KT, Chambers G, Kamar AA, et al. Cost is an important factor influencing active management of extremely preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108(1):70–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rochow N, Landau-Crangle E, Lee S, Schünemann H, Fusch C. Quality indicators but not admission volumes of neonatal intensive care units are effective in reducing mortality rates of preterm infants. PLoSONE. 2016;11(8):e0161030. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161030.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang H, Dong Y, Sun B. Admission volume is associated with mortality of neonatal respiratory failure in emerging neonatal intensive care units. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(13):2233–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1430133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Paschoalotto MAC, Passador JL, de Oliveira LR, Lopes JEF, Dantas MK, Passador CS. The regionalization of the Brazilian national health system: Proposition for performance evaluation of the regional health departments of São Paulo state, Brazil. Saude e Sociedade. 2018;27(1):80–93. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902018170095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Barata LRB, Bittar OJNV, Magalhães A, Alves SA, Carvalho ERAP. Comparação de grupos hospitalares no Estado de São Paulo. Rev Adm Saúde. 2009;11(42):8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Braun D, Braun E, Chiu V, Burgos AE, Gupta M, Volodarskiy M, Getahun D. Trends in neonatal intensive care unit utilization in a large integrated health care system. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):205–39. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Edwards K, Impey L. Extreme preterm birth in the right place: a quality improvement project. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020;105(4):445–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-317741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Teig N, Wolf HG, Bücker-Nott HJ. Mortality among premature newborns below 32 weeks of gestational age depending on level of care and patient volume in Nordrhein-Westfalen/Germany. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2007;211(3):118–22. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-960746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bittar OJNV, Vaz JD, Magalhães A. Rede hospitalar no Estado de São Paulo: mapear para regular. Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo. 2011; http://sistema.saude.sp.gov.br/sahe/documento/leitosredeHospitalar.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2021.

  40. Guerra DM. Descentralização e regionalização da assistência à saúde no Estado de São Paulo: uma análise do índice de dependência. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2015. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11606/T.6.2016.tde-16112015-112549. Accessed 2 June 2021

  41. Tegegne TK, Chojenta C, Getachew T, Smith R, Loxton D. Antenatal care use in Ethiopia: A spatial and multilevel analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):399. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2550-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lansky S, Lima Friche AA, Silva AA, Campos D, Azevedo Bittencourt SD, Carvalho ML, et al. Birth in Brazil survey: neonatal mortality, pregnancy and childbirth quality of care. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30:S192–207. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00133213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Menezes MAS, Gurgel R, Bittencourt SDA, Pacheco VE, Cipolotti R, Leal MC. Health facility structure and maternal characteristics related to essential newborn care in Brazil: a cross- sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e021431. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021431.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Pilkington H, Blondel B, Drewniak N, Zeitlin J. Where does distance matter? Distance to the closest maternity unit and risk of foetal and neonatal mortality in France. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24(6):905–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados (SEADE). O retrato das mães paulistas e dos seus filhos recém-nascidos; 2010. [Internet]. Available from: https://produtos2.seade.gov.br/produtos/midia/2018/08/spdemog_mai2010.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 2022.

  46. Peven K, Mallick L, Taylor C, Bick D, Day LT, Kadzem L, et al. Equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Equity Health. 2021;20(1):132. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01452-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Fang JL, Mara KC, Weaver AL, Clark RH, Carey WA. Outcomes of outborn extremely preterm neonates admitted to a NICU with respiratory distress. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020;105(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-316244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wyk LV, Tooke L, Dippenaar R, Rhoda N, Lloyd L, Holgate S, et al. Optimal ventilation and surfactant therapy in very-low-birth-weight infants in resource-restricted regions. Neonatology. 2020;117(2):217–24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rede Brasileira de Pesquisas Neonatais (RBPN). Histórico da Rede Brasileira de Pesquisas Neonatais; 2019. [Internet]. Available from: https://redeneonatal.com.br/historico-da-rede-brasileira-de-pesquisas-neonatais/. Accessed 25 Oct 2020.

  50. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(11):e1196–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank FAPESP for the funding, all technical staff of SEADE Foundation for their work with the database and Josiane Quintiliano Xavier de Castro, MD, for helping in the deterministic linkage between Live Birth Certificates and Death Certificates.

Funding

This research was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Project # 2017/03748–7, however with no role in any step of the study and report (including study design, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the paper for publication), which was authors’ responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Pediatria, Escola Paulista de Medicina – Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Marselhesa 630, São Paulo, Vila Clementino, 04020-060, Brazil

    Ana Sílvia Scavacini Marinonio, Daniela Testoni Costa-Nobre, Milton Harumi Miyoshi, Rita de Cassia Xavier Balda, Kelsy Catherina Nema Areco, Tulio Konstantyner, Mandira Daripa Kawakami, Adriana Sanudo, Paulo Bandiera-Paiva, Maria Fernanda Branco de Almeida, Ruth Guinsburg & Carlos Roberto Veiga Kiffer

  2. Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados (SEADE Foundation), Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, 913 - Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil

    Rosa Maria Vieira de Freitas, Lilian Cristina Correia Morais, Mônica La Porte Teixeira & Bernadette Cunha Waldvogel

Authors
  1. Ana Sílvia Scavacini Marinonio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniela Testoni Costa-Nobre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Milton Harumi Miyoshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rita de Cassia Xavier Balda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kelsy Catherina Nema Areco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tulio Konstantyner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mandira Daripa Kawakami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Adriana Sanudo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Paulo Bandiera-Paiva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rosa Maria Vieira de Freitas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lilian Cristina Correia Morais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mônica La Porte Teixeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Bernadette Cunha Waldvogel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Maria Fernanda Branco de Almeida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ruth Guinsburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Carlos Roberto Veiga Kiffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ASSM, CRVK, DTCN, MHM, MFBA, and RG contributed to conception, and design of the study. RG contributed to funding acquisition. ASSM contributed to literature search. RMF, LCCM, MLPT, and BCW contribute to data acquisition. KCNA and PBP contributed to data management. ASSM, CRVK, and DTCN contributed to analysis of data. MHM, MFBA, and RG contributed to underlying data verification. ASSM, CRVK, DTCN, MHM, KCNA, MDK, RCXB, AS, TK, PBP, MFBA, and RG contributed to interpretation of data. ASSM, CRVK, and DTCN contributed to manuscript preparation. MHM, KCNA, MDK, RCXB, AS, TK, PBP, RMF, LCCM, MLPT, BCW, MFBA, and RG contributed to the review of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version and were responsible for the decision to submit for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Sílvia Scavacini Marinonio.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidade Federal de São Paulo, under the number 4.055.489, with informed consent waive, since it was a populational retrospective unidentified database, and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Database use was possible due to FAPESP (Project # 2017/03748–7) and due to agreements #23089.004297/2008–11 and #23089.000057/2014–95 between Fundação SEADE and Universidade Federal de São Paulo.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Distribution of preterm live births rates in São Paulo State, Brazil (2004-2015).

Additional file 2.

Distribution of RDS-associated neonatal mortality crude rates in São Paulo State, Brazil (2004-2015).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marinonio, A.S.S., Costa-Nobre, D.T., Miyoshi, M.H. et al. Clusters of preterm live births and respiratory distress syndrome-associated neonatal deaths: spatial distribution and cooccurrence patterns. BMC Public Health 22, 1226 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13629-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13629-4

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us