Table 6 The regression results of “visibility” coefficients for GDA, Apple label, TLS, and Warning label in the gender, consumption frequency, and residential area variables
From: Effects of food nutrition labels on the health awareness of school-age children
Factor | B | Beta | t | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GDA | ||||
(Constant) | 4.07 | 14.07 | 0 | |
Gender | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.38 | 0.701 |
(Constant) | 4.21 | 17.49 | 0 | |
Consumption Frequency | −0.02 | −0.01 | −0.17 | 0.863 |
(Constant) | 3.72 | 13.93 | 0 | |
Residential Area | 0.34 | 0.11 | 1.81 | 0.072 |
Apple label | ||||
(Constant) | 4.25 | 14.50 | 0 | |
Gender | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.840 |
(Constant) | 3.77 | 15.60 | 0 | |
Consumption Frequency | 0.28 | 0.14 | 2.39 | 0.017* |
(Constant) | 3.67 | 13.62 | 0 | |
Residential Area | 0.49 | 0.15 | 2.53 | 0.012* |
TLS | ||||
(Constant) | 4.30 | 14.71 | 0 | |
Gender | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.712 |
(Constant) | 3.93 | 16.27 | 0 | |
Consumption Frequency | 0.25 | 0.13 | 2.11 | 0.036* |
(Constant) | 3.74 | 13.96 | 0 | |
Residential Area | 0.50 | 0.15 | 2.60 | 0.010* |
Warning label | ||||
(Constant) | 4.25 | 13.32 | 0 | |
Gender | −0.31 | −0.09 | −1.54 | 0.125 |
(Constant) | 3.64 | 13.66 | 0 | |
Consumption Frequency | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.57 | 0.569 |
(Constant) | 3.39 | 11.42 | 0 | |
Residential Area | 0.30 | 0.09 | 1.43 | 0.155 |