Skip to main content

Association between obesity and mortality in the Costa Rican elderly: a cohort study

Abstract

Background

Costa Rica, along with other Latin American countries, is undergoing population aging, with an increase in the prevalence of chronic conditions, many of them resulting from a growing prevalence of obesity. As a result of the demographic and epidemiological transitions, the causes of morbidity and mortality have changed from communicable to non-communicable diseases. An increase in overweight and obesity is hypothesized to be related to premature mortality. This study assesses the association between obesity and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a Costa Rican elderly population.

Methods

This is a secondary data analysis of the Costa Rican Longevity and Healthy Aging Study (CRELES, for its Spanish acronym), a longitudinal nationally representative cohort study of health and life-course experiences of the Costa Rican elderly. A baseline (n = 2827) and two subsequent 2-year follow-up interviews were conducted. Data analyses include descriptive statistics and survival models. Cox and Gompertz distributions were used to model general mortality and cardiovascular mortality as a function of obesity and controlling for confounders. Anthropometric measures used were Body Mass Index (BMI) and Waist Circumference (WC).

Results

Each one-unit increment in BMI was significantly associated to a 3,1% (p < 0.001) and 2,6% (p = 0.021) increment in general and cardiovascular mortality respectively. Each one-unit increment in WC was significantly associated with a 0,8% (p = 0.006) increment in general mortality, whereas WC was not significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality.

Conclusions

Obesity is associated with mortality in the Costa Rican elderly. This association is strongest between obesity and all-cause mortality. As general obesity increases, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality also increase in this population. Similarly, as central obesity increases, all-cause mortality increases. Policies aimed at preventing obesity and chronic conditions are warranted for a better survival in this population.

Peer Review reports

Background

Latin American developing countries are experiencing the process of demographic aging at a very rapid pace. The time it will take for any Latin American country to have an ageing population is less than two fifths of the time it took for the United States to reach that composition. In Costa Rica, by 2021, 14% of the total population was aged 60 years or older [1].

Aging populations experience an increase in the prevalence of chronic conditions, many of them resulting from an increasing prevalence of obesity. As a result of the demographic and epidemiological transitions, the causes of morbidity and mortality have changed from communicable to non-communicable diseases in Costa Rica [2]. In practically all populations, the adoption of diets with a higher fat content and reduced physical activity, have accompanied the benefits of modernization. These changes in diet and physical activity levels, combined with longevity, are the basis for an increasing prevalence of obesity.

Overweight and obesity are understood as the excess of body fat, which results of the imbalance between food intake and energy expenditure [3]. Obesity levels in Latin America and the Caribbean are as high, or even higher than obesity levels in the United States. In adulthood, obesity is associated with an increased prevalence of chronic diseases, and higher rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [4,5,6]. A meta-analysis of 239 different studies from 32 countries in Asia, Australia, New Zealand, Europe and North America found that in different regions, except for South Asia, there was a strong and positive relationship between overweight and all-cause mortality, especially in the case of men [4].

Furthermore, obesity has been found to contribute to the risk of cardiovascular mortality. Metabolic complications of obesity can potentiate each other. Type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure, for example, may lead to chronic kidney disease, one of the possible causes of early disability [7]. As described in previous studies, there is a strong positive relationship between obesity and mortality due to cardiovascular diseases [8,9,10]. Central obesity, measured as waist circumference or as its relationship with hip and height, has shown to be effective when studying cardiovascular risk [11].

Although disability is higher among obese elderly, an obesity paradox in the oldest of the elderly has been described in the literature, especially after the age of 80. This paradox refers to an attenuation of the negative effect that obesity has on mortality as age increases [1213]. It has been previously described that because of the loss of weight that is associated with aging, a degree of obesity can be a protective factor against mortality [14,15,16]. There is no consensus about the detrimental effect of obesity on mortality in the elderly population [17]. Nonetheless, premature death is expected to be the result of obesity at least in the younger elderly [16], before the age of 80.

Most of the studies on the association between obesity and mortality have been conducted in developed countries. In Latin America most of research has been conducted on infant mortality and on transmissible diseases. Nonetheless, Suemoto (2015) conducted a study in 7 Latin-American developing countries, which did not include Costa Rica, and found that participants with an obese-related condition such as type 2 diabetes had an increased mortality risk [18]. Studying the same Costa Rican elderly cohort that is used for this study, Santamaría (2020) found an association between premature mortality and type 2 diabetes. They also described geographical and gender inequalities in the prevalence of diabetes in Costa Rica [19]. There is a gap of evidence on the relationship between obesity and mortality in the context of Latin American elderly.

There is also not enough evidence that risk factors traditionally associated with mortality in adulthood in developed countries are the same risk factors associated with mortality in the elderly in developing countries. Until recently, no representative elderly population studies were available in Latin America. This data limitation has been overcome in Costa Rica with the CRELES study, a nationally representative cohort study of the elderly population with baseline data collected between 2004 and 2006 and whose participants’ survival has been followed up ever since.

The aim of this study is to assess the association between obesity and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a Costa Rican elderly cohort. This study provides evidence on the relationship between obesity and mortality among the elderly in developing countries for which population data is not widely available. This research contributes to the field of public health by providing decision makers with recommendations to attain healthier and longer lives for the elderly population.

Methods

This is a secondary data analysis of the Costa Rican Longevity and Healthy Aging Study (CRELES, for its Spanish acronym), a nationally representative cohort study of health and life-course experiences of the Costa Rican elderly.

A baseline (n = 2827) and two subsequent 2-year follow-up interviews were conducted. Data collection occurred between 2004 and 2006 for the baseline, between 2006 and 2007 for the second wave, and between 2008 and 2009 for the third wave. Loss to follow-up between baseline and wave 2 was 7%, and between waves 2 and 3 it was 9% of the baseline sample.

Sample design and selection

The study sample was probabilistic, two-staged and stratified. In the first stage, individuals 55 years or over, were randomly selected from the Costa Rican population census of 2000. In the second stage, the individuals were classified according to residence as defined by the Ministry of Health’s geographical areas and the final sample contained 2827 individuals [15].

Data collection was conducted via a structured interview, anthropometric measures and blood and urine samples [20], all carried out in the homes of the selected subjects. During the first interview, all subjects signed an informant consent form, responded to the questionnaire and anthropometric measures were taken. During the second visit on the following day, blood and urine samples were collected [20].

Respondent’s vital status was assessed during the three waves of CRELES, and it was also tracked by linking the CRELES dataset with the National Death Registry up to 31 October 2017. More details on this survey have been previously published [19,20,21,22].

Variables

Waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) were used as indicators of central and general obesity respectively. Body mass index was estimated as the individual’s weight divided by his squared height. Both anthropometric measures were used as continuous variables in regression models. Descriptive data for these anthropometric measures is presented as categorical variables. According to BMI, individuals were classified as underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9), overweight (25.0–29.9), or obese (≥30.0 kg/m2) [23]. Waist circumference categories for men were normal (< 94 cm), with an increased risk of metabolic complications (94–101), and substantially increased risk of metabolic complications (≥102 cm). Waist circumference categories for women were normal (< 80 cm), with increased risk of metabolic complications (80–87), and substantially increased risk of metabolic complications (≥88 cm) [23].

Body weight, height and waist circumference were measured during fieldwork. A scale and a stadiometer were placed in a firm and flat place in each participant’s house. Participant subjects were asked to stand on the scale to obtain the weight measurements. They were also asked to stand next to the scale, controlling their anatomical points, in order to measure height. Waist circumference measurements were taken with a tape measure. Participants were asked to stand in, and to indicate the level at which their belly button was. Waist circumference was measured around the abdomen at a level midway between the lowest rib and the upper hip bone. In participants with large deformations in the spine or with stability problems, waist circumference was not measured.

In addition to BMI and WC, analyses controlled for sex, education, smoking, alcohol consumption, having a fracture in the last 6 months, and the following morbidity conditions: hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, cancer, heart attack, ischemic heart disease (without infarction), and stroke.

Education was classified into incomplete primary and complete primary or higher. Smoking behavior refers to 100 or more cigarettes or cigars during participants’ lives. Categories were defined as never smoked, former smoker, passive smoker, and current active smoker. Individuals living with a smoking partner were classified as passive smokers, when they were not active smokers themselves. Alcohol consumption refers to alcoholic beverages ever consumed during individuals’ lives. Categories were defined as never drank alcohol, former drinker, occasional drinker, and current drinker. Smoking and alcohol consumption categories used in this study are similar to those used by Koawall et al. [24] and Ye et al. [25] respectively.

Survival analysis

Survival analysis is a collection of statistical procedures for data analysis for which the outcome variable is the time elapsed until an event occurs [26]. This is an appropriate statistical technique when working with longitudinal studies where the subjects’ follow-up time is available and a binary variable indicates whether or not the observed variable is censored [27].

The data was set as survival time. Follow-up time started at the date each individual was 60 and ended the date the subject died or the observation time ended on October 31, 2017. Although interviews were not necessarily conducted at the age of 60 for each participant during the first wave, date at the age of 60 was taken as the starting observation point because all the participant subjects were alive at that time. Mortality rates were computed as the ratio of deaths to the exact count of person-years.

Parametric survival regression models were used to estimate the association between mortality and obesity. Cox and Gompertz distributions were used to model mortality. Proportional risks Cox models, widely used in health sciences, were used under the assumption that mortality risks are proportional to time. Models with a Gompertz distribution for the baseline hazard were used to model mortality [28]. They are similar to Cox models, with the difference that the baseline risk is specified as a Gompertz shape parameter [27]. Costa Rican mortality rates have shown to follow a Gompertz function, especially after the age of 45 [29].

For these survival regression models, mortality was measured both as general (all-cause) and as cardiovascular. Obesity was measured both as central (WC) and as general (BMI). Control variables were sex, education, smoking, alcohol consumption, having a fracture in the last 6 months, and the following morbidity conditions: hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, cancer, myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease (no infarction), and stroke.

Because of the short time elapsed between waves (21 months between first and second wave, and 24 months between second and third wave), anthropometric measures showed no relevant change. BMI, WC and all of the covariates were therefore used as baseline measures and no time-dependent variables were considered in the survival analyses conducted.

Results

A general description of this cohort is presented in Table 1. There is a higher proportion of female elderly population, aged 60 to 69, with an almost equal distribution regarding educational status. Less than half (43%) of this elderly population has a normal BMI, whereas 51% of men and 13% of women have a normal WC.

Table 1 Percentage distributions of Costa Rican elderly according to sociodemographic characteristics, Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference

A description of risk factors is presented in Table 2. About a third of elderly are former smokers or alcohol drinkers, whereas 10% are current smokers and 3% are current alcohol drinkers. Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are the most prevalent conditions on this elderly population (48 and 40% respectively), 5% have had a myocardial infarction and 12% have ischemic heart disease.

Table 2 Percentage distributions of Costa Rican elderly according to risk factors and health condition

Cox survival models on general and cardiovascular mortality by BMI are presented in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 respectively. From the age of 60 (elapsed time since first observation = 0) up to the age of 95 (elapased time = 35), the obese population has the lowest probability of surviving death due to any cause (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Survival to general mortality by BMI

Fig. 2
figure 2

Survival to cardiovascular mortality by BMI

Similarly, from the age of 60 up to the age 90, the obese elderly have the lowest probability of surviving death due to cardiovascular disease (Fig. 2). Death associated with obesity seems to occur by the age of 90 or 95 in this elderly cohort. After this age threshold, survival probabilities by BMI intersect with each other.

Gompertz regression results for general mortality are presented in Table 3. Each one-unit increment in WC was significantly associated to a 0,8% (p < 0.001) increase in general mortality. Along the same lines each one-unit increment in BMI was significantly associated to a 3,1% (p < 0.001) increase in all-cause mortality. The odds of death are significantly higher for males and for active smokers. Diabetes and myocardial infarction are significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Stroke is associated with all-cause mortality when obesity is measured by WC but not when it is measured by BMI.

Table 3 All-cause mortality: Odds ratios from Gompertz parametric models with waist circumference or body mass index as main predictor

Regression results for cardiovascular mortality are presented in the Table 4. Each one-unit increment in BMI was significantly associated to a 2.6% (p = 0.021) increase in cardiovascular mortality. The odds of cardiovascular death are significantly higher for males and for active smokers. Hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, and stroke are significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality.

Table 4 Cardiovascular mortality: Odds ratios from Gompertz parametric models with waist circumference and body mass index as main predictor

Results from Cox proportional hazards are similar to those using Gompertz models both for all-cause mortality and for cardiovascular mortality. Each one-unit increment in WC was significantly associated to a 0,8% (p = 0.002) increase in general mortality. Each one-unit increment in BMI was significantly associated to a 2,9% (p < 0.001) increase in all-cause mortality (Table 5).

Table 5 All-cause mortality: Odds ratios from Cox models with waist circumference or body mass index as main predictor

According to the Cox regression models for cardiovascular mortality (Table 6), a significant difference in risk of death was observed between men and women (p = 0.029) which indicates that men have a 42% greater risk of death as compared to women. Hypertension was found to have a significant effect on the probability of death and individuals with this condition have double the risk of death compared to those without this health condition. A similar situation was found for individuals with diabetes and for individuals who had suffered myocardial infarction; in these cases, the risk of death was increased by 55.8 and 56.2% respectively. Smoking also had a significant effect on the risk of death, whereby current smokers had more than double the risk as compared to those who had never smoked.

Table 6 Cardiovascular mortality: Odds ratios from Cox models with waist circumference and body mass index as main predictor

The Cox regression model incorporating WC found no significant difference in the probability of death from cardiovascular causes between men and women. Among individuals with hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction or stroke, the risk of death from cardiovascular causes was significantly greater, especially for individuals with hypertension, whose risk doubled the risk as compared to those without this condition. Current smokers were also found to have an increased risk of death from cardiovascular causes.

Discussion

Results from this study show that general and central obesity, as measured by BMI and WC respectively, are associated with all-cause and with cardiovascular mortality in the elderly. In terms of magnitude as measured by each one-unit increment, the greatest association was found between BMI and all-cause mortality, followed by the association between BMI and cardiovascular mortality. General obesity seems to be a good predictor of mortality in the elderly. BMI is a relatively easy to obtain biomarker, that estimates the general level of body fat. It is widely used; it has shown to be associated with cardiovascular risk [30] and correlates positively with other biomarkers such as waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio [31]. Although BMI does not adequately differentiate relevant elements from of body weight and it can be better complemented with measures such as WC [32]. It has shown to be associated with both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in this elderly population.

WC was found to be significantly associated with all-cause mortality but not with cardiovascular mortality. Cardiovascular disease is usually a comorbid condition, which is not always reported as the main cause of death. This may be the reason why no significant association was found between WC and cardiovascular mortality. Waist circumference is a useful measure because of its direct relation with central or abdominal adiposity [17], which is associated with a number of metabolic anomalies [31]. It is associated with visceral and total fat assessed by computerized tomography [3334]. Although WC as a biomarker is not difficult to obtain, it is not as widely used as BMI on population studies. Using BMI in the absence of measures such as WC could be misleading [5]. The use of BMI in this study is advantageous because it allows for comparability with other studies, whereas its use combined with WC is more appropriate as it allows for a finer measure of abdominal obesity.

Similar to what has been found for the same cohort in other studies [15], when using BMI as a categorical variable, there seems to be a threshold around the age of 90, which survival probabilities are not associated with obesity anymore. Some studies suggest that as we grow older, the association between mortality and obesity becomes weaker [35]. Whereas other studies [3637] have described that the so-called obesity paradox may actually be the result of not studying central, but general adiposity in the elderly.

The association between obesity and mortality has been explored by other studies. A10-year follow-up study found that, after adjusting for other confounding variables, the mortality risk was 2.46 higher for elderly with dynapenic abdominal obesity [38]. A study conducted in Brazil and United Kingdom also identified that, general and central obesity, were associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly [5].

Over two thirds of all-cause deaths that have been attributed worldwide to overweight and obesity occur specifically through cardiovascular disease [39]. Cardiovascular disease in the elderly is associated with biological mechanisms of nutritional depletion, systemic inflammation and physical inactivity, which lead to muscle mass decline processes and to mortality [4041].

As a society, obesity represents high costs that are not only financial, but physical an emotional [40]. Because of being a chronic condition, obesity represents an additional cost for healthcare providers and for the individual population, with a strong correlation between high BMI and medical expenditure in the United States of America [42].

Obesity is a common risk factor for a number of chronic diseases associated with an increased mortality, such as hypertension and diabetes. Elderly individuals with hypertension, for example, have twice the risk of death as compared to those who do not have this condition [43]. The fact that obesity is itself a risk factor for hypertension emphasizes the importance of policies for obesity prevention in the general population.

This study also found that sex was a significant predictor of mortality. Although in the general elderly population mortality in men is higher than in women, many of the extra years lived by women are spent in poor health [44]. Studies conducted in diabetic populations have found that woman with diabetes have a higher risk of mortality than men with the same condition [45]. Furthermore, multiple studies have also reported that the probability of having cardiovascular diseases is usually greater in men than in women throughout the life cycle; however, as age advances, it is women who begin to have an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases [46].

Smoking was significantly associated with mortality in this elderly cohort. There is a strong relationship between smoking and multiple diseases, such as acute coronary events, stroke, and cardiovascular disease. Previous studies have reached similar results, and have concluded that the risk of suffering from some cardiovascular disease can be up to double in smokers. There is also a clear gradient effect that is associated with the fact that quitting smoking reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease [47].

This study found that comorbidities that are significantly associated with mortality are similar to findings of other studies regarding the association between cardiovascular mortality and conditions such as hypertension [48] and stroke [49].

The increasing number of overweight and obese individuals has made obesity a challenge for the Costa Rican healthcare system because, as this study has shown, it predicts an increased mortality in the elderly population. Planning actions to reduce obesity, not only benefits the population’s quality of life, but also protects the sustainability of the healthcare system.

Information bias is a limitation of this study because of the use of self-reports for comorbid conditions. Selection bias is also a limitation because survey data relies on the population that survived at least to the age of 60 in 2005, when the baseline survey was conducted. Also, another limitation of this study is the impossibility of studying individual changes in obesity over time because of the short time-span between waves and the resultant small changes in nutritional status as indicated by the anthropometric measurements in this elderly population. Another limitation related specifically to cardiovascular mortality is that this study uses the immediate cause of death (the final disease or condition resulting in death) rather than the multiple underlying causes of death (conditions leading to the event listed as the immediate cause of death) that are captured in each individual death report. Given the fact that cardiovascular disease is usually a comorbid condition, this would have the effect of underestimating the effect of overweight and obesity on mortality in this population.

Despite these limitations, this study presented several strengths. Similar to what has been shown in other studies, the use of Waist Circumference besides the use of Body Mass Index, allowed for the identification of people with central obesity at a higher risk of all-cause mortality. Policy making is an implication expected from the evidence presented by this cohort study. As mentioned by Livingston [50], we must first understand the underlying factors of population obesity to be able to act upon reversing this worldwide trend. In order to really impact the population, social determinants of health need to be acknowledged in health policies to reduce obesity.

Policies aimed at preventing obesity and chronic conditions are warranted for a better survival in this population. Improving lifestyles and reducing obesity in the general population are needed to attain healthier and longer lives for the elderly. Also, public policies should have a gender component that takes into account special needs for both the male and female populations. Future lines of research are advised to be conducted on how individual changes in nutritional status over time can have an impact on mortality in the elderly population.

Conclusions

Obesity is associated with mortality in the Costa Rican elderly. This association is strongest between obesity and all-cause mortality. As general obesity increases, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality also increase in this population. Similarly, as central obesity increases, all-cause mortality increases.

Reducing the prevalence of overweight and obesity along the lifecycle is certainly required as a public health policy in order to obtain life expectancy gains. This is especially true because the longer is the duration of overweight and obesity along the lifecycle of an individual, the greater is his risk of mortality [51,52,53].

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials from the CRELES study are available at https://ccp.ucr.ac.cr/proyectos/creles/presentacion

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CRELES:

Costa Rica Longevity and Healthy Aging Study, for its Spanish acronym

WC:

Waist Circumference

References

  1. Centro Centroamericano de Poblacion. Información Censal. CCP. Available from: https://censos.ccp.ucr.ac.cr/.

  2. Rosero-Bixby L. Socioeconomic development, health interventions, and mortality decline in Costa Rica. Scand J Soc Med Suppl. 1991;46:33–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gadamuz S, Suárez G. Generalities of sarcopenic obesity in older adults. Revista Medicina Legal Costa Rica. 2020;37(1):114–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Di Angel AE, Bhupathiraju SN, Wormser D, GaoP KS, de Gonzalez AB. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual participant-data meta analysis of 239 prospective studies in four countries. Lancet. 2016;388(10046):776–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Whitlock L, et al. Body mass index and mortality. Lancet. 2009;374.

  6. Xu H, Cupples LA, Stokes A, Liu CT. Association of obesity with mortality over 24 years of weight history: findings from the Framingham heart study. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(7):e184587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson J, Swift-Scanlan T, Sayler J. Obesity and 1-year mortality in adults after Sepsis: a systematic review. Biological Research of Nursing. 2020;221(1):103–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coutinho T, Goel K, Correa de Sa D, Carter R, Hodge D, Kragelund C. Combining body mass index with measures of central obesity in the assessment of mortality in subjects with coronary disease: role of normal weight central obesity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61.

  9. Romero-Corral A, Somer V, Sierra-Johnson J, Kore J. Normal weight obesity: a risk factor for cardiometabolic dysregulation and cardiovascular mortality. Eur Heart J. 2010;31 (PMID: 19933515).

  10. Sahakyan K, Somers V, Rodriguez-Escudero J, Hodge D, Carter R, Sochor O. Normal-weight central obesity: implications for total and cardiovascular mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(11).

  11. Romero-Corral A, Cepeda-Valery B, Pressman G, Figueredo V. Impact of obesity on total and cardiovascular mortality-fat or fiction? Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(4):233–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bender R, Jockel KH, Trautner C, Spraul M, Berger M. Effect of age on excess mortality in obesity. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;281:1498–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thorpe RJ Jr. Ferraro, KF. 2004. Aging, obesity, and mortality: misplaced concerns about obese older people? Research on Aging. 2004;26(1):108–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027503258738.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lisko L, Tiainen K, Stenholm S, Luukkaala T, MikkoHurme M, Lehtimäki T, et al. In flammation, adiposity, and mortality in the oldest old. Rejuvenation Res. 2012;15:445–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosero-Bixby L, Dow WH, Fernandez X. CRELES: Costa Rican Longevity and Healthy Aging Study. Methods, Wave 3. Berkeley: Department of Demography, University of California, Berkeley; 2012. Electronic Document http://www.creles.berkeley.edu, Accessed 6 April 2022

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stenholm S, Mehta NK, Elo IT, Heliövaara M, Koskinen S, Aromaa A. Obesity and muscle strength as long-term determinants of all-cause mortality—a 33-year follow-up of the mini-Finland health examination survey. Int J Obes. 2014;38(7) https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2011.1310.

  17. Rosero-Bixby L, Brenes-Camacho G, Méndez-Chacón E. Obesidad, envejecimiento y mortalidad en Costa Rica. Sociedad y Adulto Mayor en América Latina. Estudios sobre Envejecimiento en la Región. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: ALAP Editor, UNFPA, 1ª. Ed. 2008: 117-138p.

  18. Suemoto CK, Lebrao ML, Duarte YA, Danaei G. Effects of body mass index, abdominal obesity, and type 2 diabetes on mortality in community-dwelling elderly in Sao Paulo, Brazil: analysis of prospective data from the SABE study. J Gerontol A BiolSci Med Sci. 2015;70:8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Santamaría-Ulloa C, Montero-López M. Projected impact of diabetes on the Costa Rican healthcare system. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01291-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Brenes-Camacho G, Rosero-Bixby L. Diabetes mellitus en adultos mayores costarricenses. Población y Salud en. Mesoamérica. 2007.

  21. Santamaría-Ulloa C, Montero-López M, Rosero-Bixby L. Diabetes epidemics: inequalities increase the burden on the healthcare system. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(2):45–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosero-Bixby L, Antich D. Estudio longitudinal de mortalidad de adultos costarricenses 1984-2007. Poblacion y Salud En Mesoamérica. 2013;7:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  23. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: Report of a WHO consultation. Technical Report Series no. 894. 2000.

  24. Koawall B, Rathmann W, Strassburger K, Heier M, Holle R, Thorand B, et al. Association of passive and active smoking with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly population: the KORA S4/F4 cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(6).

  25. Ye X, Miao C, Zhang W, Sheng C, Huang Q, Wang J. Alcohol consumption in relation to cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in an elderly male chinease population. BMC Public Health. 2021;22(1).

  26. Kleinbaum D, Klein M. Survival Analysis. Inc: A Self-Learning Text. EstadosUnidos. Springer Science+Bussines Media; 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Rebasa P. Conceptos básicos del análisis de supervivencia. Cirugía española. 2005;78(4):222–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-739X(05)70923-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied survival analysis. New York: John Wiley Sons; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rosero-Bixby L, Brenes-Camacho G, Méndez-Chacón E. Obesidad, envejecimiento y mortalidad en Costa Rica. Sociedad y Adulto Mayor en América Latina. Brasil: Estudios sobre Envejecimiento en la Región. Rio de Janeiro. ALAP Editor, UNFPA, 1ª. Ed. 2010: 117-138p

  30. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Sullivan L, Parise H, Kannel WB. Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: the Framingham experience. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(16):1867–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huxley R, Mendes S, Zheleznyakov E, Reddy S, Chan J. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist: hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular risk--a review of the literature. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:6–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2009.68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Suárez-Carmona W, Sánchez-Oliver A. Índice de masa corporal: ventajas y desventajas de su uso en la obesidad. Relación con la fuerza y la actividad física. Nutrición Clínica en. Medicina. 2018;12(3):128–39.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harris TB, Visser M, Everhart J, et al. Waist circumference and sagittal diameter reflect total body fat better than visceral fat in older men and women. The health, aging and body composition study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;904(462-473):37.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ho SC, Chen YM, Woo JLF, et al. Association between simple anthropometric indices and cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25:1689–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Thomas F, Pannier B, Benetos A, Vischer U. Visceral obesity is not an independent risk factor of mortality in subjects over 65 years. VascHealth Risk Manag. 2013;9:739–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bowman K, Atkins JL, Delgado J, Kos K, Kuchel GA, Ble A, et al. Central adiposity and the overweight risk paradox in aging: follow-up of 130,473 UK biobank participants. Am J ClinNutr. 2017;106(1):130–5. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.147157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bosello O, Vanzo A. Obesity paradox and aging. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity. 2021;26:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00815-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rossi AP, Bianchi L, Volpato S, Bandinelli S, Guralnik J, Zamboni M, et al. Dynapenic abdominal obesity as pre- dictor of mortality and disability worsening in older adults: a 10-year prospective study. ClinNutr. 2016;35:6.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Collaborators O, Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rantanen T, Volpato S, Heikkinen LFE, Fried LP, Guralnik JM. Hand- grip strength and cause-specific and Total mortality in older disabled women: exploring the mechanism. JAGS. 2003;51:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Landi F, Russo A, Cesari M, Pahor M, Liperoti R, Danese P, et al. Walking one hour or more per day prevented mortality among older persons: results from ilSIRENTE study. PrevMed. 2008;47:5.

    Google Scholar 

  42. García-Rodríguez J. Félix, García-Fariñas, Anai, Rodríguez-León, Gustavo Adolfo, Gálvez-González, Ana María, Dimensión económica del sobrepeso y la obesidad como problemas de salud pública. Salud en Tabasco [Internet]. 2010;16(1):891–6 Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48719442006.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Redon J, Telolez-Plaza M, Orozco-Beltran D, Gil-Guillen V, Pita Fernandez S, Navarro-Perez J, et al. Impact of hypertension on mortality and cardiovascular disease burden in patients with cardiovascular risk factors from a general practice setting: the ESCARVAL-risk study. J Hypertens. 2016;34(6).

  44. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. (2018). Findings from the global burden of disease study 2017. Recovered in https://www.healthdata.org/policy-report/findings-global-burden-disease-study-2017

  45. Ballotari P, Ranieri S, Luberto F, Caroli S, Greici M, Giorgi P, et al. Sex differences in cardiovascular mortality in diabetics and nondiabetic subjects: a population-based study (Italy). Int J Endocrinol. 2015.

  46. Mikkola T, Gissler M, Merikukka M, Tuomikoski P, Ylikorkala O. Sex differences in age-related cardiovascular mortality. PLoS One. 2013;8(5).

  47. Mons U, Muezzinler A, Gellert C, Schottker B, Abnet C, Bobak M, et al. Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on cardiovascular events and mortality among older adults: Meta-analysis of individual participant data from prospective cohort studies of the CHANCES consortium. Br Med J 2015 April.

  48. Nambiar L, LeWinter M, VanBurden P, Dauerman H. Decade-long temporal trends in U.S. hypertension-related cardiovascular mortality. Journal of the Amercian college of. Cardiology. 2020;75(20).

  49. Ronning O. Very long-term mortality after ischemic stroke: predictors of cardiovascular death. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;127.

  50. Livingston EH. Reimagining obesity in 2018. A JAMA theme issue on obesity. JAMA. 2018;319(3):238–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.21779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Abdullah A, Wolfe R, Stoelwinder JU, de Courten M, Stevenson C, Walls HL, et al. The number of years lived with obesity and the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(4):985–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Preston SH, Mehta NK, Stokes A. Modeling obesity histories in cohort analyses of health and mortality. Epidemiology. 2013;24(1):158–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mehta NK, Stenholm S, Elo IT, Aromaa A, Heliovaara M, Koskinen S. Weight histories and mortality among Finnish adults the role of duration and peak body mass index. Epidemiology. 2014;25(5):707–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Principal Investigator of the CRELES project: Luis Rosero Bixby. Co-principal investigators: Xinia Fernández and William H. Dow. Collaborating investigators: Ericka Méndez, Guido Pinto, Hannia Campos, Kenia Barrantes, Floribeth Fallas, Gilbert Brenes and Fernando Morales. Informatics and support staff: Daniel Antich, Aaron Ramírez, Jeisson Hidalgo, Juanita Araya, and Yamileth Hernández. Field workers: José Solano, Julio Palma, Jenny Méndez, Maritza Aráuz, Mabelyn Gómez, Marcela Rodríguez, Geovanni Salas, Jorge Vindas and Roberto Patino. The authors of this paper express their gratitude to Hazel Quesada-Leitón and Camila Aguilar-Gómez for their support in data management.

Funding

The CRELES project is a longitudinal study of the Universidad de Costa Rica, carried on by the Centro Centroamericano de Población in collaboration with the Instituto de Investigaciones en Salud, with the support of the Wellcome Trust Foundation (Grant No. 072406).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CSU, conceived the study methods and design. CSU led the data analysis. CSU and MML drafted the manuscript and all authors read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Santamaría-Ulloa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The CRELES study was approved by the Ethical Science Committee of the Universidad de Costa Rica (reference: VI-763-CEC23 -04). All study participants provided written informed consent prior to study participation. All the databases of the study have been made anonymous (the name or identifier has been removed) to avoid risks to the privacy of the participant. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors has a commercial or associative interest that presents a conflict of interest with this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santamaría-Ulloa, C., Chinnock, A. & Montero-López, M. Association between obesity and mortality in the Costa Rican elderly: a cohort study. BMC Public Health 22, 1007 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13381-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13381-9

Keywords