Skip to main content
Download PDF

Healthy dietary patterns and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in less-developed ethnic minority regions: a large cross-sectional study

BMC Public Health volume 22, Article number: 118 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the associations between healthy dietary patterns and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in less-developed ethnic minority regions (LEMRs), where the prevalence of MAFLD is increasing rapidly and dietary habits are quite different from those in developed countries. Moreover, a significant subset of MAFLD individuals in LEMRs are nonobese, but the efficacy of dietary patterns on MAFLD individuals with different obese statuses is also unclear. We aimed to test the associations of two wildly recommended a priori dietary patterns—Alternate Mediterranean diet (AMED) and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH)—with the risk of MAFLD in the total population, and further in nonobese and obese individuals.

Methods

We recruited 99,556 participants in the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort Study, an ongoing cohort study in less-developed southwest China. Using validated food frequency questionnaire, each participant was assigned an AMED score and a DASH score. MAFLD was ascertained as hepatic steatosis on ultrasound together with diabetes, overweight/obesity, or two other metabolic risk factors. We performed logistic regression with inverse probability of exposure weighting (IPEW) to examine associations between two dietary patterns and MAFLD, adjusting for potential confounders under the guidance of directed acyclic graphs. Further, analyses were stratified by body mass index.

Results

We included 66,526 participants (age 49.5±11.0; 62.6% women), and the prevalence of MAFLD was 16.1%. Participants in the highest quintile of DASH score showed strong inverse associations with risks of MAFLD (OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.91; Ptrend < 0.001) compared with participants in the lowest quintile. The association between DASH and nonobese MAFLD (OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.61-0.78; Ptrend < 0.001) was stronger (I2 = 78.5 % ; Pheterogeneity = 0.001) than that with obese MAFLD (OR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98; Ptrend = 0.002). There was a null association between AMED and MAFLD risk.

Conclusions

In LEMRs, a DASH diet but not AMED was associated with MAFLD. The relationship appeared to be more pronounced in nonobese MAFLD individuals than in obese MAFLD individuals.

Peer Review reports

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prominent chronic liver disease worldwide and affects approximately 25% of the global population [1]. Individuals with NAFLD may progress to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma [2]. As it is largely associated with metabolic diseases, NAFLD has been recently renamed as metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) with a consensus by an international panel of experts [3, 4]. Over the past decade, the prevalence of NAFLD has dramatically increased in less-developed countries [1, 5], especially in populations of low socioeconomic status (SES) and racial/ethnic minorities [6, 7], with the rate increasing more than twice as fast in some regions as in developed countries [8]. It has become a global public health concern to reduce the prevalence of MAFLD in less-developed regions.

Diet is one of the key modifiable lifestyle factors involved in the management of MAFLD, as with the previous term NAFLD [9]. Some studies have examined the effects of different dietary components or nutrients on the risk of NAFLD [10, 11]. However, individual dietary constituents are intercorrelated with each other to influence disease. By contrast, dietary patterns reflect the overall effect of diet and facilitate dietary recommendations [12]. Some healthy dietary patterns, such as the Mediterranean diet and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, have been recommended for the management of NAFLD [13, 14]. However, these dietary patterns were proposed based on dietary habits from developed countries, and whether they can be generalized to other populations, particularly racial/ethnic minority groups in less-developed regions, is still doubtful. To our knowledge, large population-based evidence on the efficacy of western dietary guidance in MAFLD management from less-developed ethnic minority regions (LEMRs) is scarce.

Furthermore, although MAFLD is strongly associated with obesity, it can also develop in individuals with a relatively normal body mass index (BMI), a condition that is often described as lean or nonobese MAFLD [4] and was initially described as nonobese NAFLD in Asian populations [15]. The prevalence of nonobese NAFLD in the US was reported to be 7% [16], while in some rural areas of Asian countries, it ranges from 4 to 40% [8]. Previous studies reported that nonobese NAFLD individuals may even be at higher risk for the development of severe liver disease than obese NAFLD [17] and associated with higher mortality [18]. However, there have been few data on the efficacy of dietary intervention in nonobese individuals with NAFLD or MAFLD, and it is still unclear whether clinicians should recommend dietary guidance to individuals with MAFLD in both nonobese and obese populations. Therefore, identifying the phenotype of MAFLD and related dietary interventions is of vital importance for the management of MAFLD.

Based on a large-scale population, using data from the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort (CMEC) Study with highly diverse socioeconomic status, ethnicity, habitual diet, cultural background, living environment, etc. [19], we aimed to (1) investigate the associations of two dietary patterns [alternate Mediterranean diet (AMED) score and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score] with MAFLD risk in the total population and (2) examine the associations of the same dietary patterns in nonobese and obese individuals.

Methods

Study population

The CMEC study is a population-based prospective cohort study involving approximately 100,000 adults from six ethnic minority groups as well as the majority Han group in less-developed Southwest China. Details of the study design have been described previously [19]. In brief, 99,556 participants were recruited at a baseline survey between May 2018 and September 2019, given a full consideration of the diversity in SES, ethnic characteristics, and disease patterns. All participants completed a full laptop-based questionnaire with face-to-face interviews and underwent anthropometric measurement and blood tests by well-trained health workers. The flowchart of the study population is depicted in Figure 1. We excluded participants who were aged < 30 or >79 years at the baseline survey, had no available information on diet and outcome data, had extreme total energy intake (< 600 or > 3500 kcal/day for females and < 800 or > 4200 kcal/day for males), and had implausible BMI (< 14 or > 45 kg/m2). Furthermore, to eliminate potential reverse causality, 24,926 participants who self-reported physicians diagnosed with chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary heart disease, stroke, or cancer at the baseline survey were excluded. Finally, a total of 66,526 eligible participants were included in the main analysis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study. CMEC, the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort Study; BMI, body mass index. a Outcome included physical measurement and blood tests

Full size image

The study protocol was approved by the Sichuan University Medical Ethical Review Board and local ethics committee at each participating site. All the participants provided their written informed consent before data collection.

Data on diet

Dietary information was collected at baseline using a quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) based on the Chinese Dietary Guidelines and the eating habits of Southwestern Chinese, covering 13 major food groups: rice, wheat products, coarse grain, tubers, red and processed meats, poultry, fish/sea food, eggs, dairy products, fresh vegetables, preserved vegetables, fresh fruits, and soybean products. Participants were asked how often on average during the preceding 12 months they had consumed each food group and how many grams per meal according to a standard serving size molds. For alcohol and sweeten beverage, the frequency, quantity, and types of consumption were collected; for oil and salt, the household consumption and how many persons eat at home at breakfast, lunch, dinner during the past month were asked. Finally, we calculated the daily consumption of each food group and alcohol as well as the average consumption of cooking oil and salt per person. Total energy intake was estimated based on the China food exchange lists and the 2018 China food composition tables (standard edition) [20, 21]. In addition, to assess the reproducibility, the FFQ was repeated during the repeated survey from August 2020 to November 2020 in nearly 10% of the baseline participants. Additionally, in a subsample of 1,163 participants, we conducted a three-day nonconsecutive 24-hour dietary recall (24HDR) to assess the validity of the FFQ. The Spearman rank correlation coefficients for reproducibility between the FFQ food groups ranged from 0.16 for fresh vegetables to 0.62 for alcohol and tea, and the de-attenuated Spearman rank correlation coefficients for validity ranged from 0.1 for soybean products to 0.66 for rice. More details are provided in our previous study [22].

Scores of dietary patterns

Scores for the two dietary patterns (i.e., AMED and DASH) were computed for all participants. The AMED score was designed to assess adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern based on an adapted version of traditional Mediterranean diet for a non-Greek population [23,24,25]. We focused on 8t key food or nutrient group components: fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, fish, ratio of monounsaturated to saturated fatty acids (MUFA:SFA ratio), red and processed meats, alcohol. The food group component of nuts was eliminated in our study because information on nuts consumption was not collected separately. For each of the components (except for alcohol), all participants were classified into quintiles according to their intake ranking. For fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, fish, MUFA:SFA ratio, participants in the highest quintile received a score of 5, and those in the lowest quintile received a score of 1. For red and processed meats, participants in the highest quintile received a score of 1, and those in the lowest quintile received a score of 5. For alcohol, we classified individuals into five groups according to their alcohol consumption: (10,30], (0,10] or (30,40], 0 or (40,45], (45,50], and >50 grams per day for men; (5,15], (0,5] or (15,25], 0 or (25,30], (30,35], and >35 grams per day for women. Then, we assigned scores of 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 to corresponding individuals, respectively. The total score ranges from 8 to 40, and higher values of the score indicated greater adherence to AMED.

The DASH score was developed to measure adherence to a DASH-style diet. Due to the low consumption of nonfat and low-fat dairy products in our study population, a modified DASH score with nonfat and low-fat dairy replaced by full-fat dairy products [26] was adopted in our study. Additionally, we eliminated the food group component of sweetened beverages because the regular consumption of sweetened beverages was extremely low in our study population. As with the AMED score, the food group component of nuts was excluded. We constructed the DASH score based on quintile rankings within the population of each component as well, focusing on 7 components: fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, full-fat dairy products, sodium, red and processed meat. For the first 5 components, the lowest intake was assigned 1 point, and the highest intake was assigned 5 points. In contrast, for sodium, red and processed meat, reverse scoring for the quintile ranks is used. By summing the component scores, we obtained an overall DASH score for each participant, ranging from 7 (no adherence) to 35 (perfect adherence). A detailed scoring criterion for dietary patterns is given in Supplementary Table 1-3.

Study outcome

The outcome of this study was MAFLD. All participants underwent abdominal ultrasound, anthropometry measurements and blood tests at the baseline survey. Abdominal ultrasound was performed to assess the presence of hepatic steatosis by qualified ultrasonographers. Weight and height were measured by trained health workers using standardized methods. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared; the BMI cutoff value of 25 kg/m2 was used to define the nonobese and obese Asian population, which is a widely used cutoff established by the WHO [27]. Waist circumference was measured as the midpoint between the iliac crest and the lower costal margin with tape all around the body in the horizontal position, taking the average of two measurements. For blood pressure, trained health workers measured blood pressure three times using an Omron HEM-8711 blood pressure monitor after participants had rested in a seated position for at least 5 min. For blood tests, after overnight fasting for at least 12 hours, blood samples were taken and shipped via cold chain to regional central laboratories (Chengdu, Chongqing, Guiyang, and Kunming). Within 24 hours, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was tested by an MQ-6000 glycated hemoglobin analyzer (Shanghai Medconn Biotechnology Corporation); the plasma glucose and lipid profiles were tested by an AU5800 automated chemistry analyzer (Beckman Coulter Commercial Enterprise).

According to the latest diagnostic criteria for MAFLD proposed by an international expert panel [4], MAFLD in our study was defined by evidence of hepatic steatosis on ultrasound together with diabetes, overweight/obesity (i.e., BMI ≥23 kg/m2 for Asians), or two or more of the following metabolic risk abnormalities: waist circumference ≥90 cm in men and ≥80 cm in women; blood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg; plasma triglycerides (TG) ≥1.7 mmol/l; plasma high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) <1.0 mmol/l for men and <1.3 mmol/l for women; prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose 5.6-6.9 mmol/l or hemoglobin A1c 5.7-6.4%). Note that we eliminated two metabolic conditions from the original definition since the insulinemia test and the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) test was not carried out at the baseline survey.

Covariates

A directed acyclic graph (DAG) was constructed representing the existing literature to select a minimally sufficient set of covariates to adjust for confounding, according to the protocol of “Evidence Synthesis for Constructing Directed Acyclic Graphs” (ESC-DAGs) [28]. The independent tests were further carried out to continuously modify the proposed DAG. Based on the DAG, the following variables were retained as confounders in our statistical models: age, sex, urbanicity, ethnicity, marital status, highest education attained, household income, profession, regular smoking, physical activity in metabolic equivalent tasks, total energy intake, regular intake of sweeten beverage, regular intake of dietary supplements, regular intake of spicy food, regular intake of pepper food, insomnia symptoms, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, menopause status for women, family history of cardiometabolic diseases, and BMI. Information on these selected confounders was mainly collected at the baseline questionnaire. A more detailed description of the DAG has been added as Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 1.

Statistical analyses

Mean values and percentages of baseline characteristics were calculated for MAFLD status and obese status at baseline, with adjustment for age and sex by direct standardization (using the entire study sample as the standard population) as appropriate.

We used logistic regression with the inverse probability of exposure weighting (IPEW) to examine associations between dietary patterns and the outcome of MAFLD, with the lowest quintile as the reference for each dietary pattern. When analyzing the DASH score, we further adjusted for alcohol intake because alcohol was not part of that score. Associations were quantified by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To test for trends, models were conducted using the median of each quintile as a continuous variable. We next performed these models separately for nonobese and obese individuals, and heterogeneity between nonobese and obese individuals was evaluated with the Cochran Q test and chi-square (χ2) test. Subsequently, to facilitate the interpretations of the association between each dietary pattern and MAFLD, we evaluated the influence of each of the dietary components on the MAFLD risk by alternately subtracting one component at a time from the original score for each dietary pattern [29]. Because stringent data cleaning and audio reviewing were conducted, missing values were generated from the outliers that could not be verified. For the missing values of food groups, we used the chain equations method [30] for multiple imputation (5 times imputation).

Furthermore, we carried out subgroup analyses by sex, age, regular smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, urbanicity, and ethnic group. The chi-square (χ2) test was used to examine heterogeneity among different strata. We also performed several sensitivity analyses: (1) using 24 kg/m2 as the BMI cutoff value of lean or overweight/obese individuals in the definition of MAFLD and using 28 kg/m2 to distinguish obese from nonobese individuals according to the guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults [31]; (2) assessing the association with each score in participants without exclusion of self-reported physician-diagnosed chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary heart disease, stroke or cancer to examine the magnitude of potential reverse causality [3]; adopting the logistic regression without IPEW; (4) performing analyses with the complete case instead of imputed data; (5) assessing the associations of two dietary patterns with NAFLD risks. All statistical analyses were carried out with the R Project for Statistical Computing version 4.0.2 (Vienna, Austria).

Results

Participant characteristics

In the entire sample, 62.6% were women, the mean age was 49.5±11.0 years, 42.1% were ethnic minorities and the mean BMI was 23.8±3.4 kg/m2. After exclusion of self-reported physician-diagnosed outcomes, the prevalence of MAFLD was 16.1%. A total of 44,061 individuals (66.2%) had a BMI < 25.0 kg/m2, and 22,465 individuals (33.7%) were obese. Age- and sex-standardized baseline characteristics, stratified by MAFLD and obese status, are shown in Table 1. In general, individuals with MAFLD had higher BMI and less physical activity than those without MAFLD but had similar AMED and DASH scores. They also tended to have higher SES (household income and profession) levels, higher consumption of beverage, spicy and pepper food, and a higher likelihood of reporting a family history of cardiometabolic diseases. Similar characteristics were also found among nonobese and obese populations. Of note, compared to obese MAFLD, nonobese MAFLD individuals were more likely to be current smokers and had a higher consumption of alcohol.

Table 1 Age- and sex-standardized baseline characteristics in the CMEC study, according to obesity and MAFLD status
Full size table

Dietary patterns and MAFLD

The adjusted association of AMED and DASH with MAFLD is shown in Table 2. There was a significant inverse trend with increasing DASH scores and MAFLD risks (Ptrend < 0.001). Compared with participants in the lowest quintile of the DASH score, those in the highest quintile showed strong inverse associations with risks of MAFLD (OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.91) after controlling for potential confounders. However, there seemed to be a null association between AMED (OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.04; Ptrend = 0.361) and MAFLD risk.

Table 2 Adjusted associations between AMED and DASH and MAFLD in total, nonobese and obese populations
Full size table

Table 2 also shows the associations of the two dietary patterns with MAFLD stratified by obese status. We observed similar results in nonobese and obese populations as in the total population. Moreover, DASH showed stronger (I2 = 78.5 % ; Pheterogeneity = 0.001) associations with nonobese MAFLD (OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.61-0.78; Ptrend < 0.001) than with obese MAFLD (OR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98; Ptrend < 0.001). AMED was not associated with nonobese MAFLD or obese MAFLD, with no differences in obese status (I2 = 7.4 % ; Pheterogeneity = 0.365).

Dietary components analyses

Because the trends of associations were similar among different populations, only the contribution of each component of AMED and DASH to MAFLD risks in the total population was further examined, as shown in Table 3. For AMED, a weak inverse association with MAFLD (OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99) was shown after excluding the MUFA:SFA ratio. Because the OR value of AMED overall was very close to 1, the proportions of contributions seemed quite large. For DASH, full-fat dairy products and sodium contributed predominantly to the positive associations. The association with MAFLD risk was attenuated after excluding full-fat dairy products (OR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.97), sodium (OR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.93), and the proportions of contributions to the associations were 50.6% and 20.5%, respectively.

Table 3 Odds ratios associated with AMED and DASH scores and after alternate subtraction of each of its dietary components in the total population
Full size table

Subgroup and sensitivity analyses

Because of similar association trends among different populations, subgroup analyses were only constructed between DASH and MAFLD in the total population. As shown in Figure 2, the associations of DASH and MAFLD were consistent across participants, irrespective of sex, smoking status, physical activity level, alcohol consumption, and ethnic groups (all Pheterogeneity > 0.05). Significant differences across strata were observed for age, urbanicity, and ethnic groups. Compared to the ethnic minorities, DASH showed a stronger association with MAFLD among the Han majority, which was agreed with the stratified results of urbanicity because nearly all of the ethnic minorities lived in rural areas.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Subgroup analysis of estimated associations between DASH and MAFLD in the total population. CI, confidence interval; MET, metabolic equivalent task. a Low alcohol intake is defined as less than 140 g/day for men and less than 70 g/day for women; high alcohol intake is defined as more than 140 g/day for men and more than 70 g/day for women

Full size image

Overall, sensitivity analyses (e.g., applying the Chinese standard definition of overweight and obesity, without exclusion of individuals with self-reported physician-diagnosed diseases, using logistic regression) provided similar results and are detailed in Supplementary Tables 4–6. When performing the analysis with the complete cases, similar results were found, albeit the heterogeneity of DASH between nonobese and obese MAFLD was slightly attenuated and statistically not significant (Supplementary Table 7). When using NAFLD as the outcome, we found that the associations of dietary patterns and NAFLD were similar to results of MAFLD, but compared to MAFLD definition, the prevalence of NAFLD was lower (15.4%) and less obese individuals with fatty liver were identified (Supplementary Table 8).

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large population-based study to examine whether Mediterranean or DASH is associated with MAFLD in LEMRs. This study shows that better adherence to DASH but not the AMED dietary pattern was significantly associated with a lower risk of MAFLD. The association was more pronounced in nonobese MAFLD participants than in obese MAFLD participants. Furthermore, our study indicated that the same dietary guidelines should be recommended to MAFLD individuals as NAFLD individuals in LEMRs.

While the term MAFLD has only been recently introduced to replace NAFLD [4], there are strong indications of acceptance and endorsement worldwide for MAFLD [32,33,34,35]. To date, a few studies have reported that compared with the NAFLD criteria, the MAFLD criteria could identify a greater number of individuals with metabolically complicated fatty liver [36,37,38]. Consistent with these studies, we found that the change from NAFLD to MAFLD could identify more fatty liver individuals with obesity in our study. Though we confirmed that the same dietary guidelines should be recommended to both NAFLD and MAFLD, individuals with poor metabolic health may benefit from the definition shift when it comes to disease prevention.

To our knowledge, only few studies have examined the effects of dietary patterns and NAFLD in less-developed regions. Using a factor analysis, which is an a posteriori, data-driven method to define dietary patterns, a cohort study in Tianjin of China identified 3 dietary patterns: sugar rich dietary pattern, vegetable rich dietary pattern, and animal food dietary pattern [39]. Dietary patterns rich in animal foods or sugar were associated with an increased risk of NAFLD, whereas a vegetable rich dietary pattern was not associated [39]. A case-control study [40] and a cross-sectional study [41] from China have also shown a positive association between animal foods pattern and NAFLD. Another cross-sectional study with 1,639 participants in Shandong of China identified three a posteriori patterns, traditional Chinese, Western, and high-energy dietary patterns [42]. This study found that adherence to the western dietary pattern was associated with higher risks of NAFLD [42]. A cross-sectional study with 797 adults in China has reported that Diet Quality Index-International but not the Mediterranean diet was associated with lower prevalence of NAFLD [43]. These studies generally strengthened the importance of a healthy dietary pattern in preventing NAFLD development or progression in less-developed regions, but the evidence considering ethnic disparities was lacking. In this study, based on a larger-scale population and focusing on areas with diverse ethnic minorities, we found it necessary to generalize a healthy dietary pattern like DASH to LEMRs.

Our findings of DASH with MAFLD agree with previous studies investigating the association of DASH with NAFLD [44, 45]. In a randomized controlled clinical trial addressing weight loss and metabolic status among NAFLD participants from Iran, consumption of a DASH diet for 8 weeks had a beneficial effect on body weight and metabolic profiles, including liver enzymes, triglycerides, insulin metabolism markers, inflammatory markers, and oxidative stress markers [44]. However, all of the participants in that study were either overweight or obese. Recently, another Chinese study showed that adherence to the DASH diet was independently associated with a markedly lower prevalence of NAFLD in middle-aged and elderly adults [45], but BMI was not taken into account as a covariate or a stratification factor but a mediator in this study. Our study confirmed and refined these associations, and we focused on the phenotype of MAFLD, especially nonobese MAFLD, showing that the protective effect of DASH on nonobese MAFLD was greater than that of obese MAFLD.

In our study, we found that full-fat dairy products and sodium contributed predominantly to the association of DASH with MAFLD. Although studies linking dairy products and sodium to NAFLD are scarce, there is strong evidence regarding associations between the two components and metabolic disorders, which supports our findings. For dairy products, findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study [46] and another Chinese cohort study [47] demonstrated that dairy consumption was associated with a significantly lower risk of diabetes and favorable changes in cardiometabolic traits, indicating that consumption of dairy products should be encouraged in less-developed countries where dairy consumption is low. Some nutrients, such as milkfat, vitamin D, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and whey proteins, in dairy products may play protective roles [48]. For instance, calcium may interact with SFAs in milkfat to decrease fat absorption, lower TG concentrations, and improve the HDL-C to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ratio [49, 50]. For sodium, a significant positive association with the risk of NAFLD and metabolic syndrome was demonstrated in recent studies [51,52,53]. It has been proposed that high sodium intake might impair the insulin signaling step, leading to dysregulation of insulin sensitivity and increased fat buildup in the body [54]. For decades, a high level of sodium intake has remained the leading dietary risk factor for metabolic disorders in China [55]. As a dietary pattern initially developed to control sodium intake, it is not surprising that there was a consistently inverse association for DASH with the risk of MAFLD in our study.

Previous studies from European countries showed greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet was associated with lower prevalence of NAFLD [56, 57], and a Mediterranean-style diet has been recommended for the management of NAFLD by the EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guideline [13]. However, the effects of Mediterranean-style diets on NAFLD or related cardiometabolic risks are still controversial, especially in non-Mediterranean regions [58, 59]. Contrary to findings in European countries, our results did not find a significant association between AMED and MAFLD, which was consistent with another Chinese cross-sectional study of NAFLD [43]. In our study, the MUFA:SFA ratio appeared to be the most influential component that was positively associated with MAFLD. This may be related to a serious lack of high-quality sources of MUFAs (such as olive oil or marine fish) and the deep cooking manner in less-developed regions, which are quite different from Mediterranean regions.

Diet modification guidelines for individuals with normal body weight have been an unresolved issue in real-world clinical practice. To date, the importance of BMI has been demonstrated in many diet studies on hepatic steatosis [10, 56, 60]. However, only a few epidemiological studies have specifically investigated the role of diet between nonobese NAFLD and obese NAFLD, but they all focused on dietary macronutrient composition, such as protein [10] and carbohydrate [60]. Our results added to the limited number of studies that evaluated the association between diet and MAFLD in nonobese and obese individuals and showed the importance of dietary patterns beyond the single nutrition components in nonobese MAFLD individuals, which can facilitate adoption in both public health and clinical practice. In our study, we confirmed that both obese MAFLD and nonobese MAFLD individuals could follow a DASH diet, and the association was more pronounced in nonobese MAFLD individuals.

The reason why DASH showed a more pronounced relationship with nonobese MAFLD is unclear. Based on the evidence of NAFLD, one explanation is that participants with nonobese MAFLD could have different genetic predispositions from obese MAFLD, as with NAFLD. Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 (PNPLA3) is one of the most important genetic determinants of NAFLD [61], and the PNPLA3 rs738409 gene polymorphism is strongly associated with hepatic fat levels and hepatic inflammation [61]. Carriers of the PNPLA3 rs738409 G allele experience greater improvement in liver fat after lifestyle modification, with a greater reduction in blood total cholesterol, LDL-C level [62]. As a population study reported, the G allele at PNPLA3 rs738409 was more common in nonobese NAFLD participants than in obese NAFLD participants [63]. The difference in the G allele may partly explain the heterogeneity in our results between nonobese and obese individuals.

The main strength of this study is the large-scale population from LEMRs, providing a unique opportunity to examine the associations between two a priori dietary patterns (i.e., AMED and DASH) and MAFLD risks, particularly the associations with nonobese MAFLD risks, in less-developed regions where nonobese MAFLD has been an increasingly concerning health issue. Furthermore, we performed analyses with the application of ESC-DAGs and IPEW, which are under the framework of causal inference.

Nonetheless, some limitations need to be addressed. First, the FFQ used in our study only included 13 crude food groups, not specific food items. The tool might be flawed, but considering that most participants from our study regions speak different local languages that need to be translated from the local translators, and consume local foods that are not found in any existing food database, the food group-based and simplified food questionnaire may be the only feasible way to collect dietary information from various ethnic regions in a large population-based study. However, it should not have a significant impact on the assessment of dietary patterns and total energy intake. By analyzing the subsample data of 24HDR, we found that the differences between the calculation of total energy intake based on crude food groups and that based on specific food items were small and roughly randomly distributed around zero. Second, although we used a validated FFQ to measure dietary intake, recall bias could not be easily ruled out. Third, as most of the current measurement error correction methods are only applicable to a single food item or nutrient [64, 65], we did not correct the measurement errors in this study. Forth, in the assessment of MAFLD, the objective indicators of insulin and hs-CRP were not available in our baseline survey for the sake of feasibility. Fifth, whereas we adjusted for a variety of confounders based on a DAG, there might still be risk of residual confounding. Sixth, our study population only consisted of Chinese individuals, which may also limit the generalizability of our findings to other LEMRs from other parts of the world.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found that a DASH diet was associated with MAFLD in LEMRs, and this relationship appeared to be more pronounced in nonobese MAFLD individuals than in obese MAFLD individuals. The results of this large population-based study add to the current evidence on the importance of dietary patterns in MAFLD, suggesting that DASH is superior dietary guidance to AMED regarding reducing MAFLD risks in LEMRs, especially in nonobese individuals with MAFLD.

Availability of data and materials

Data described in the manuscript, codebook, and analytic code will be available from the corresponding author under reasonable request. (Xing Zhao, Ph.D, email: xingzhao@scu.edu.cn)

Abbreviations

MAFLD:

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

SES:

Socioeconomic status

DASH:

Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension

LEMRs:

Less-developed ethnic minority regions

BMI:

Body mass index

CMEC:

The China Multi-Ethnic Cohort Study

AMED:

Alternate Mediterranean diet

FFQ:

Food frequency questionnaire

24HDR:

24-hour dietary recall

DAG:

Directed acyclic graph

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

MUFA:SFA ratio:

ratio of monounsaturated to saturated fatty acids

References

  1. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, et al. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28431 [published Online First: 29 Dec 2015].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anstee QM, Targher G, Day CP. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(6):330–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.41 [published Online First: 20 Mar 2013].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J, et al. MAFLD: a consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(7):1999–2014.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.312 [published Online First: 12 Feb 2020].

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020;73(1):202–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039 [published Online First: 12 Mar 2020].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Younossi Z, Tacke F, Arrese M, et al. Global perspectives on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2019;69(6):2672–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30251 [published Online First: 05 Sep 2018].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Agbim U, Carr RM, Pickett-Blakely O, et al. Ethnic disparities in adiposity: focus on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, visceral, and generalized obesity. Curr Obes Rep. 2019;8(3):243–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-019-00349-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong B, Arnold LW, Peng Y, et al. Ethnic differences in cardiometabolic risk among adolescents across the waist–height ratio spectrum: National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). Int J Cardiol. 2016;222:622–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou F, Zhou J, Wang W, et al. Unexpected rapid increase in the burden of NAFLD in China from 2008 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2019;70(4):1119–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30702 [published Online First: 10 May 2019].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang XJ, Malhi H. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(9):ITC65–80. https://doi.org/10.7326/AITC201811060 [published Online First: 07 Nov 2018].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alferink LJ, Kiefte-de Jong JC, Erler NS, et al. Association of dietary macronutrient composition and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in an ageing population: the Rotterdam Study. Gut. 2019;68(6):1088–98. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315940 [published Online First: 02 Aug 2018].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zelber-Sagi S, Ivancovsky-Wajcman D, Fliss Isakov N, et al. High red and processed meat consumption is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance. J Hepatol. 2018;68(6):1239–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.015 [published Online First: 25 Mar 2018].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cespedes EM, Hu FB. Dietary patterns: from nutritional epidemiologic analysis to national guidelines. The Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101(5):899–900. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.110213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. European Association for the Study of the L, European Association for the Study of D, European Association for the Study of O. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004 [published Online First: 12 Apr 2016].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hydes TJ, Ravi S, Loomba R, et al. Evidence-based clinical advice for nutrition and dietary weight loss strategies for the management of NAFLD and NASH. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2020;26(4):383–400. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2020.0067 [published Online First: 18 July 2020].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim D, Kim WR. Nonobese fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(4):474–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.028 [published Online First: 02 Sep 2016].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Negro F, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in lean individuals in the United States. Medicine. 2012;91(6):319–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e3182779d49 [published Online First: 03 Nov 2012].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hagstrom H, Nasr P, Ekstedt M, et al. Risk for development of severe liver disease in lean patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A long-term follow-up study. Hepatol Commun. 2018;2(1):48–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1124 [published Online First: 07 Feb 2018].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cruz ACD, Bugianesi E, George J, et al. 379 Characteristics and long-term prognosis of lean patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(5):S-909. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(14)63307-2.

  19. Zhao X, Hong F, Yin J, et al. Cohort profile: the China Multi-Ethnic cohort (CMEC) study. Int J Epidemiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa185 [published Online First: 25 Nov 2020].

  20. National Institute for Nurtition and Health. China food composition tables. 6th ed. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  21. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Dietary guide for adult diabetes patients (WS/T 429-2013), 2013.

  22. Xiao X, Qin Z, Lv X, et al. Dietary patterns and cardiometabolic risks in diverse less-developed ethnic minority regions: results from the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort (CMEC) Study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021;15:100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Trichopoulou A, Costacou T, Bamia C, et al. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fung TT, McCullough ML, Newby PK, et al. Diet-quality scores and plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clinical nutrition. 2005;82(1):163–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shan Z, Li Y, Baden MY, et al. Association between healthy eating patterns and risk of cardiovascular disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(8):1090–100. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2176 [published Online First: 17 Jun 2020].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chiu S, Bergeron N, Williams PT, et al. Comparison of the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet and a higher-fat DASH diet on blood pressure and lipids and lipoproteins: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(2):341–7. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.123281 [published Online First: 01 Jan 2016].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. The Lancet 2004;363(9403):157-163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15268-3

  28. Ferguson KD, McCann M, Katikireddi SV, et al. Evidence synthesis for constructing directed acyclic graphs (ESC-DAGs): a novel and systematic method for building directed acyclic graphs. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(1):322–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz150 [published Online First: 22 July 2019].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Trichopoulou A, Bamia C, Trichopoulos D. Anatomy of health effects of Mediterranean diet: Greek EPIC prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2009;338:b2337. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2337 [published Online First: 25 Jun 2009].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(3):1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03 [published Online First: 12 Dec 2011].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen C, Lu FC. The guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci. 2004;17(Suppl):1–36.

  32. Eslam M, Alkhouri N, Vajro P, et al. Defining paediatric metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(10):864–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00183-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nan Y, An J, Bao J, et al. The Chinese Society of Hepatology position statement on the redefinition of fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2021;75(2):454–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mendez-Sanchez N, Arrese M, Gadano A, et al. The Latin American Association for the Study of the Liver (ALEH) position statement on the redefinition of fatty liver disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(1):65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30340-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shiha G, Alswat K, Al Khatry M, et al. Nomenclature and definition of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: a consensus from the Middle East and north Africa. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30213-2.

  36. van Kleef L, Ayada I, Alferink L, et al. Metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease improves detection of high liver stiffness: The rotterdam study. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.32131.

  37. Yamamura S, Eslam M, Kawaguchi T, et al. MAFLD identifies patients with significant hepatic fibrosis better than NAFLD. Liver Int. 2020;40(12):3018–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14675.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin S, Huang J, Wang M, et al. Comparison of MAFLD and NAFLD diagnostic criteria in real world. Liver Int. 2020;40(9):2082–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang S, Gu Y, Bian S, et al. Dietary patterns and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adults: a prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(10):5373–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.08.021 [published Online First: 25 Sep 2021].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Xia Y, Zhang Q, Liu L, et al. Intermediary effect of inflammation on the association between dietary patterns and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutrition. 2020;71:110562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2019.110562 [published Online First: 2019 07 Dec].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang CQ, Shu L, Wang S, et al. Dietary patterns modulate the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese adults. Nutrients. 2015;7(6):4778–91. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7064778 [published Online First: 2015 18 Jun].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu X, Peng Y, Chen S, et al. An observational study on the association between major dietary patterns and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese adolescents. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(17):e0576. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010576 [published Online First: 2018 29 Apr].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chan R, Wong VW, Chu WC, et al. Diet-quality scores and prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population study using proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0139310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139310 [published Online First: 30 Sep 2015].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Razavi Zade M, Telkabadi MH, Bahmani F, et al. The effects of DASH diet on weight loss and metabolic status in adults with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized clinical trial. Liver Int. 2016;36(4):563–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.12990 [published Online First: 28 Oct 2015].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Xiao ML, Lin JS, Li YH, et al. Adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet is associated with lower presence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in middle-aged and elderly adults. Public Health Nutr. 2020;23(4):674–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019002568 [published Online First: 01 Oct 2019].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dehghan M, Mente A, Rangarajan S, et al. Association of dairy intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2288–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31812-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zong G, Sun Q, Yu D, et al. Dairy consumption, type 2 diabetes, and changes in cardiometabolic traits: a prospective cohort study of middle-aged and older Chinese in Beijing and Shanghai. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0975.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rice BH, Cifelli CJ, Pikosky MA, et al. Dairy components and risk factors for cardiometabolic syndrome: recent evidence and opportunities for future research. Adv Nutr. 2011;2(5):396–407. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.111.000646 [published Online First: 15 Feb 2012].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mena-Sanchez G, Becerra-Tomas N, Babio N, et al. Dairy product consumption in the prevention of metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(suppl_2):S144–S53. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmy083 [published Online First: 16 May 2019].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Lorenzen JK, Nielsen S, Holst JJ, et al. Effect of dairy calcium or supplementary calcium intake on postprandial fat metabolism, appetite, and subsequent energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(3):678–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Shen X, Jin C, Wu Y, et al. Prospective study of perceived dietary salt intake and the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019;32(6):802–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12674 [published Online First: 19 Jun 2019].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Aktary ML, Eller LK, Nicolucci AC, et al. Cross-sectional analysis of the health profile and dietary intake of a sample of Canadian adults diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Food Nutr Res. 2020;64:4548. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v64.4548 [published Online First: 17 Oct 2020].

  53. Soltani S, Kolahdouz Mohammadi R, Shab-Bidar S, et al. Sodium status and the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(2):196–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1363710 [published Online First: 29 Aug 2017].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Brey CW, Akbari-Alavijeh S, Ling J, et al. Salts and energy balance: a special role for dietary salts in metabolic syndrome. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(5):1971–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.10.021 [published Online First: 18 Nov 2018].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. He Y, Li Y, Yang X, et al. The dietary transition and its association with cardiometabolic mortality among Chinese adults, 1982–2012: a cross-sectional population-based study. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2019;7(7):540–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30152-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Khalatbari-Soltani S, Imamura F, Brage S, et al. The association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and hepatic steatosis: cross-sectional analysis of two independent studies, the UK Fenland Study and the Swiss CoLaus Study. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1251-7 [published Online First: 25 Jan 2019].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Baratta F, Pastori D, Polimeni L, et al. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: effect on insulin resistance. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(12):1832–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.371 [published Online First: 25 Oct 2017].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Liyanage T, Ninomiya T, Wang A, et al. Effects of the Mediterranean diet on cardiovascular outcomes-a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0159252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159252 [published Online First: 11 Aug 2016].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Rees K, Takeda A, Martin N, et al. Mediterranean-style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019;3(3):Cd009825. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009825.pub3 [published Online First: 14 Mar 2019].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kwak JH, Jun DW, Lee SM, et al. Lifestyle predictors of obese and non-obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(5):1550–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.08.018 [published Online First: 18 Sep 2017].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Romeo S, Kozlitina J, Xing C, et al. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Genet. 2008;40(12):1461–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Shen J, Wong GL, Chan HL, et al. PNPLA3 gene polymorphism and response to lifestyle modification in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30(1):139–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12656 [published Online First: 22 July 2014].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wei JL, Leung JC, Loong TC, et al. Prevalence and severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in non-obese patients: a population study using proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(9):1306–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.235 quiz 15 [published Online First: 29 July 2015].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bennett DA, Landry D, Little J, et al. Systematic review of statistical approaches to quantify, or correct for, measurement error in a continuous exposure in nutritional epidemiology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0421-6 [published Online First: 21 Sep 2017].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Looman M, Boshuizen HC, Feskens EJ, et al. Using enhanced regression calibration to combine dietary intake estimates from 24 h recall and FFQ reduces bias in diet-disease associations. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(15):2738–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980019001563 [published Online First: 03 July 2019].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the team members and participants involved in the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort (CMEC). We are grateful to Prof. Xiaosong Li at Sichuan University for his leadership and fundamental contribution to the establishment of the CMEC. Prof. Li was the former principal investigator of the CMEC study who passed away in 2019 and will remain in our hearts forever.

Funding

The CMEC study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0907303). Xiong Xiao was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81903415), the Key R&D Project of Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (Grant No. 2020YFS0215) and CNS-ZD Tizhi and Health Fund (Grant No. CNS-ZD2020-149). Xing Zhao was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81773548, and 81973151). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the funders. The funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaofen Xie and Bing Guo contributed equally as first co-authors.

  2. Ting Chen, Baima Kangzhuo and Xing Zhao contributed equally as senior co-authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No.16, People’s South Road, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Xiaofen Xie, Bing Guo, Xiong Xiao, Lu Long, Junmin Zhou, Ning Zhang, Yuan Zhang & Xing Zhao

  2. School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China

    Jianzhong Yin

  3. Baoshan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China

    Jianzhong Yin

  4. School of Public Health, the key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China

    Ziyun Wang

  5. Chengdu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, China

    Xiaoman Jiang

  6. Tibet Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lhasa, China

    Jingzhong Li

  7. Chongqing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.8, Changjiang 2nd Road, Chongqin, 400042, China

    Ting Chen

  8. Tibet University, No.10, East Tibet University Road, Lhasa, 850000, China

    Baima Kangzhuo

Authors
  1. Xiaofen Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bing Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiong Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jianzhong Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ziyun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaoman Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jingzhong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lu Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Junmin Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ning Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ting Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Baima Kangzhuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xing Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xiaofen Xie and Bing Guo: study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting manuscript. Xiong Xiao: study concept and design, acquisition of data, critically revising manuscript. Jianzhong Yin, Ziyun Wang, Xiaoman Jiang, Jingzhong Li, Lu Long and Junmin Zhou: data acquisition, critically revising manuscript. Ning Zhang and Yuan Zhang: statistical analysis. Ting Chen, Baima Kangzhuo and Xing Zhao: study concept and design, data acquisition, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and approval of the final article.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ting Chen, Baima Kangzhuo or Xing Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All procedures involving research study participants were approved by the Sichuan University Medical Ethical Review Board [ID: K2016038]. All the participants provided their written informed consent before data collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Text 1.

Diet-related questionnaires (excerpt from the CMEC questionnaires). Supplementary Table 1. Scoring criteria for the AMED score in the CMEC study. Supplementary Table 2. Scoring criteria for the DASH score in the CMEC study. Supplementary Table 3. Exchange values of fatty acids for food groups included in the CMEC studya. Supplementary Methods: directed acyclic graphs (DAG). Supplementary Figure 1. The final constructed DAG. Supplementary Table 4. Estimated associations using 24 kg/m2 and 28 kg/m2 as the BMI cutoff value of lean or overweight or obese individuals. Supplementary Table 5. Estimated associations in participants without exclusion of self-reported physician diagnosed chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary heart disease, stroke or cancer. Supplementary Table 6. Estimated associations using logistic regression. Supplementary Table 7. Estimated associations with the complete case instead of imputed data. Supplementary Table 8. Adjusted associations between AMED and DASH and NAFLD.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, X., Guo, B., Xiao, X. et al. Healthy dietary patterns and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in less-developed ethnic minority regions: a large cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 22, 118 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12486-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12486-x

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us