Skip to main content
Download PDF

Circumstances and toxicology of violence-related deaths among young people who have had contact with the youth justice system: a data linkage study

BMC Public Health volume 21, Article number: 2207 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Young people who have had contact with the youth justice system have an increased risk of dying from violence. Examining the context of violence-related deaths is essential in informing prevention strategies. We examined the circumstances and toxicology of violence-related deaths among young people who have had contact with the youth justice system in Queensland, Australia.

Methods

This data linkage study linked youth justice records from Queensland, Australia (30 June 1993-1 July 2014) on 48,670 young people to national death and coroner records (1 July 2000-1 January 2017). Circumstances and toxicology of deaths were coded from coroner’s records. We calculated the incidence of violence-related deaths that were reported to a coroner. Fisher’s exact tests were used to examine crude differences in the circumstances and toxicology of violence-related death, according to sex and Indigenous status.

Results

There were 982 deaths reported to a coroner in the cohort. Of which, 36 (4%) were from violence-related causes (incidence: 6 per 100,000 person-years, 95% confidence interval: 4-8). People who died from violence were most frequently male (n = 28/36; 78%), and almost half were Indigenous (n = 16/36; 44%). The majority of violence-related deaths involved a weapon (n = 24/36; 67%), most commonly a knife (n = 17/36; 47%). Compared to men where the violent incident was most frequently preceded by an altercation (n = 12/28; 43%), for women it was frequently preceded by a relationship breakdown or argument (n < 5; p = 0.004). Substances most commonly present in toxicology reports were cannabis (n = 16/23; 70%) and alcohol (n = 15/23; 65%).

Conclusions

Therapeutic alcohol and other drug programs, both in the community and detention, are likely important for reducing violence-related deaths among young people who have had contact with the youth justice system. The majority of violence-related deaths among women were in the context of intimate partner violence, indicating the urgent need for interventions that prevent intimate partner violence in this population. Diversion programs and increased investment in health and social services may reduce the overrepresentation of Indigenous people in the youth justice system and in violence-related deaths.

Peer Review reports

Background

Young people who have had contact with the youth justice system (hereafter referred to as justice-involved young people) are more likely to die from violence compared to the general population of the same age [1]. Although limited, research on violence-related deaths among justice-involved young people has largely drawn upon United States (US) based samples [1, 2], the extent that these risks are shared in other countries is unknown. Studies from Australia [3] and Finland [4] report proportions of deaths due to violence (3-12%) that are considerably lower than in the US (48-68%) [1, 2]. Examining why, where and how these deaths occur is important to understand these international differences and to inform targeted violence prevention strategies.

To date, only one study, which included adults released from prison in the US, has examined the circumstances of violence-related death among people involved in the criminal justice system [5]. This study found that common circumstances included being involved in a crime, or an argument with a person known to the deceased, before death [5]. To our knowledge, no previous studies have examined the circumstances of violence-related deaths among justice-involved young people. This is surprising given that young people are more likely to be involved in the criminal justice system [6], and are more likely to be victims of violence [7], than other age groups.

Evidence from the general population may provide some useful insights into the likely circumstances of violence-related deaths among justice-involved young people. In the general population, substance use, particularly alcohol use, is associated with being both a victim and perpetrator of violence [8]. The majority of victims and perpetrators of violence are young men [7], while women constitute the majority of victims of family, intimate partner and sexual violence [7]. People who are socioeconomically deprived, marginalised (e.g., Indigenous people, Black people) [9], or criminalised (e.g. people who use drugs) [8] are disproportionately impacted by violence victimisation. These groups are also overrepresented in the youth and adult criminal justice systems [10]. Given this, preventing violence among justice-involved young people is likely an important target for addressing health inequity.

The circumstances and toxicology (the measurement and analysis of substances present in a person’s body [11]) of violence-related deaths can be explored using data from coroner’s investigations. Coroner’s data have been used to examine the circumstances and toxicology of violence-related deaths in the general population in Australia [12] and internationally [8, 13]. Building upon these methods, we aimed to 1) describe the circumstances and toxicology of violence-related deaths reported to an Australian coroner among justice-involved young people, and 2) examine whether the circumstances and toxicology of these deaths differed by sex and/or Indigenous status.

Methods

Study design

We conducted a retrospective data linkage study of young people who had contact with the youth justice system in Queensland, Australia from 30 June 1993 to 1 July 2014. We examined deaths occurring after contact with the youth justice system that were reported to an Australian coroner from 1 July 2000 to 31 January 2017.

Data sources and linkage process

Data on all young people (aged 10-18 years) who had contact with the youth justice system in Queensland from 30 June 1993 to 1 July 2014 were retrieved from youth justice records. Youth justice system contact included being charged with an offence, with or without being found guilty, or being found guilty of an offence and subsequently being sentenced to a community-based or a custodial order (i.e., youth detention). During the study period, Youth Justice Queensland was responsible for young people aged 10 to 16 years who came in contact with the youth justice system [14]. Once sentenced, some young people could remain in youth detention or under youth justice supervision in the community after the age of 16 [14]. For this reason, young people up to the age of 18 years at baseline are included in our cohort.

Youth justice records were probabilistically linked, with subsequent clerical review, to death records from the National Death Index (NDI) [15] (30 June 1993-31 January 2017) and to the National Coronial Information System (NCIS) [16] (1 July 2000-31 January 2017) using participants’ name, sex, date of birth, and all known aliases. Youth justice records were also probabilistically linked with adult correctional records (1 January 1994-31 December 2016), which provided information on subsequent incarcerations within the adult system. This linkage methodology is considered the ‘gold standard’ approach to accurately and reliably identify deaths among people involved in the criminal justice system in Australia [17].

The NCIS contains records from all coroner’s investigations in Australia since 1 July 2000 (1 January 2001 for Queensland) and in New Zealand since July 2007 [16]. In Australia, some deaths are investigated by a coroner in order to determine the identity of the decedent, the cause of death, and to inform recommendations to prevent future deaths of a similar cause and circumstance [16]. While criteria for reporting a death to the coroner vary between jurisdictions, typically, reportable deaths are unexpected; occur in violent and/or unnatural circumstances; occur as a result of, or during, a medical or surgical procedure; occur in State care or custody; or where the person’s identity or cause of death is unknown [16]. Each death in the NCIS can contain up to four full-text reports from the coroner’s investigation including: a police summary of circumstances, autopsy and toxicology reports, and the coroner’s finding [16]. The NCIS also contains pre-coded fields on demographic (e.g., age, sex, Indigenous status) and mortality (e.g., cause and location of death) characteristics [16]. Only deaths where the coroner’s investigation was complete at the time of data extraction (i.e., ‘closed records’ [16]) were included.

Primary outcome

We examined violence-related deaths reported to an Australian coroner that occurred in the community following contact with the youth justice system. Violence-related deaths included those where the underlying cause of death was coded using the following International Classification of Diseases Tenth Edition codes in either the NCIS or the NDI: T74, X85–Y09, Y87.1, Y35, Y89.0. Additionally, we included deaths where the ‘intent’ of death in the NCIS was pre-coded as either 1) ‘assault’, or 2) ‘legal intervention’ (i.e., the killing of a person by a police officer acting in the course of duty) where the officer was in close contact with the deceased.

Measures

Age at death (< 19/19-24/≥25 years), sex (male/female), and most serious youth justice contact over the study period (charge without an order/order without detention/detention) were obtained from youth justice records. To minimise under-ascertainment, a common issue with coding of Indigenous status [18], a person was considered Indigenous if they were coded as such in any death or correctional data source. Employment status (employed/unemployed/other/not reported) and relationship status (married or de facto relationship/not in a relationship/not reported) were extracted from pre-coded NCIS fields.

Other information on the circumstances of the violence-related death were coded by the lead author from full-text reports in the NCIS using quantitative manifest content analysis [19]. We used a combination of a priori and emergent codes. The codes for the perpetrator’s sex (0 = male/1 = female/2 = not reported) and the relationship of the perpetrator to the deceased (0 = stranger/1 = friend or acquaintance/2 = intimate partner/3 = family member/4 = not reported) were determined a priori. Open text coding was used to record the number of perpetrators, the date and location of the violent incident, and type of weapon used. Codes relating to the events preceding the fatal violent event emerged during the analytical process. If reported, the text describing the events that preceded the fatal violence was extracted and later reviewed to identify codes. These codes were grouped into the category ‘events preceding the fatal violent event’. All substances present in the toxicology reports uploaded to the NCIS were recorded.

Statistical analysis

Frequencies and proportions were used to describe the data. As distributions were skewed, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) are reported. Where possible, we compared crude differences in the circumstances and toxicology violence-related deaths by sex and Indigenous status using Fisher’s exact test (results not presented in the tables due to the small number of deaths in some cells). We calculated the crude rate of violence-related death per 100,000 person-years of observation in the community, excluding time spent in youth detention or adult incarceration. As the circumstances and toxicology of violence-related deaths are likely different in the incarceration environment compared to the community, fourteen deaths, none from violence-related causes, that occurred during a period of incarceration were excluded. Table ambiguation by standard cell suppression (cells n < 5) was employed to avoid potential re-identification. All analyses were conducted in Stata/SE Release 15 [20].

Results

The cohort included 48,670 young people (aged 10-18 years at the start of the study period), who were followed for a total of 623,823 person-years in the community (median follow-up per person = 14 years; IQR 8-18). Over the study period, the most serious youth justice contact experienced by the cohort was frequently a charge (n = 28,250, 58%), followed by an order (n = 12,878, 26%), and detention (n = 7542, 16%). There were 1261 deaths, of which 982 (78%) occurred in the community and had a record on the NCIS (Supplementary Fig. S1). Thirty-six (4%) of these deaths were from violence-related causes. The rate of violence-related deaths that were reported to a coroner was 6 deaths per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval: 4-8). Of the cohort whose most serious youth justice contact was a charge, 19 (0.1%) died from violence. Of those whose most serious contact was an order or detention, 7 (0.105%) and 10 (0.1%) died from violence, respectively. The most common other cause of death was suicide (n = 363; 37%), followed by transport accidents (n = 190; 19%) (Supplementary Table S1).

Characteristics of people who died from violence-related causes

The majority of the 36 people who died from violence were male (n = 28; 78%) and, where employment status was known, not employed at the time of death (n = 15; 42%) (Table 1). Just under half were Indigenous (n = 16; 44%), despite Indigenous people comprising only 27% of the cohort. At the time of death, a higher proportion of women who died from violence (n = 5; 63%) than men who died from violence (n = 6; 21%; p = 0.038) were married or in a de facto relationship. At the end of the study period, the most serious youth justice contact experienced by those who died from violence was most frequently a charge only (n = 19, 53%), followed by detention (n = 10, 28%), and an order without detention (n = 7, 19%). The median age at death for those who died from violence was 24 years (IQR 20-28 years; range 14-32 years). Eleven violence-related deaths (31%) had secondary causes of death that were not directly related to injuries sustained during the violent incident. These were most frequently substance-related causes (n = 10; 28%).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of young people who had contact with the youth justice system
Full size table

Circumstances of the violent incident

The majority of the 36 violence-related deaths involved the use of a weapon (n = 24; 67%), most commonly a knife (n = 17; 47%; Table 2). The violent event most commonly occurred in a private location (n = 20; 56%). Where the date of the violent event was recorded (n = 31; 86%), it often occurred on a Friday (n = 9; 25%), followed by a Sunday (n = 7; 19%). For men, fatal violence was frequently preceded by a physical or verbal altercation (n = 12; 43%), whereas for women, it was frequently preceded by a relationship breakdown or argument (n < 5; p = 0.004). The circumstances of death did not differ by Indigenous status (p > 0.05). There were no deaths from legal intervention in the cohort.

Table 2 Circumstances and toxicology of violence-related deaths reported to a coroner among justice-involved young people
Full size table

Information on the person(s) who perpetrated the violence was limited and inconsistently reported. There were 35 perpetrators of violence across the 31 violence-related deaths where some information on the perpetrator(s) was reported. There was most frequently one perpetrator of violence for each death (n = 27; 75%), who was usually male (n = 32; 91%). For women the perpetrator was often a current or former intimate partner (n = 5/8; 63%), and for men, they were commonly a friend or acquaintance (n = 6/27; 22%), followed by a stranger (n = 5/27; 19%).

Toxicology of violence-related deaths

Toxicology reports were available for 23 (64%) violence-related deaths. At least one substance was present in the majority of these deaths (n = 22; 96%; Table 2), with a median of two substances present (IQR: 1-3) in the toxicology reports. In six (26%) toxicology reports only one substance was identified, which was most frequently alcohol (n = 5; 83%), whereas multiple substances were detected in 16 (70%) toxicology reports. Cannabis was the most common substance present across all reports (n = 16; 70%), followed by alcohol (n = 15; 65%). Other substances detected included benzodiazepines, morphine, and meth/amphetamines (all n < 5). The most common co-occurring substances were alcohol and cannabis (n = 9; 39%). The toxicology results were similar across sex and Indigenous status.

Discussion

This is the first study to examine the circumstances and toxicology of violence-related deaths among justice-involved young people. In this large, whole-population cohort from Queensland, Australia, the proportion of deaths from violence (4%) was considerably lower than previous US studies (48-68%) [1, 2], but is comparable to a smaller Australian study that examined deaths after release from youth detention in Victoria (3%) [3]. From 2000 to 2016, the violence-related death rate among those aged 10-44 years (at the end of the study period the oldest person in the cohort was 42 years in age) in the general population in Australia was 1.5 per 100,000 population [21]. Although the proportion of deaths from violence in this cohort was comparatively small, the rate of violence-related death among justice-involved young people (6 deaths per 100,000 person-years) is substantially higher than the rate of death in the Australian general population.

There were clear sex differences in the circumstances of violence-related deaths. Among women, fatal violence was often prefaced by intimate partner violence or relationship breakdown. In comparison, among men, violence-related deaths commonly occurred after an altercation with a friend or acquaintance. Previous studies examining violence-related deaths in this population did not report on the person(s) who perpetrated the violence [1, 3, 4, 22]. Although, our finding is consistent with the gender differences in violence-related deaths in the general population both in Australia [23] and internationally [7]. While there are very few rigorously evaluated violence prevention interventions for young women involved in the youth justice system, a randomised controlled trial involving skill-building exercises and HIV prevention information was found to potentially reduce violence victimisation by helping adult women released from prison make healthier decisions about their relationships [24]. Additional evidence-based interventions that meet the needs of justice-involved young women and support them to stay safe from violence appear indicated and should be paired with universal policies that aim to foster healthy norms and attitudes towards women.

Most of the deaths from violence in the cohort involved the use of a weapon. The use of any weapon in a violent event is associated with an increase in severity of injuries [25]. Reducing the use of weapons may reduce the severity of injuries and risk of death sustained from violent events. Consistent with patterns of weapon use at the population level in Australia [26] and the United Kingdom (UK) [27], the most commonly reported weapon used in the cohort was a knife. There is limited evidence on effective interventions to reduce knife violence. A systematic review of knife crime among young people in the UK found that adverse childhood experiences, poor mental health, previous violence victimisation, having peers that carry knives, economic deprivation and unemployment were connected to young people carrying knives and perpetrating knife violence [28]. These factors are also common among young people who have contact with the youth justice system [29]. In our cohort, people who died from violence were commonly not employed, which is also a risk factor for violence victimisation in the general population, particularly for men [30].

Our finding is in contrast to previous US studies, which found that the vast majority of violence-related deaths among young people released from youth detention involved a firearm [1, 22]. This likely reflects the differences in firearm policies and availability between the US and Australia [31]. Limiting the availability and use of firearms through implementing restrictive firearm policies, such as in Australia [32], is associated with a decrease in violence-related deaths at the population level [32]. This difference in firearm policy may also be contributing to the greater number of violence-related deaths in the US cohorts compared to our study cohort.

Indigenous people were disproportionately impacted by violence-related death. This finding has parallels in the US context, where people who identified as Black or Hispanic were more likely to die from violence than other demographic groups [1, 22]. Indigenous people in Australia [33], and Black and Hispanic people in the US [34, 35], are overrepresented in the youth and adult criminal justice systems and in violence-related deaths at the population level. However, these groups are not homogenous, and each has different histories of racial oppression (e.g., colonisation, slavery). Diverting people away from the criminal justice system and redirecting funds towards community-based health and social services may be an opportunity for violence prevention. In Australia, community justice models that include justice-reinvestment programs may both reduce the overrepresentation of Indigenous people in the criminal justice system and reduce violence in Indigenous communities [36].

Although limited by the number of toxicology reports available, cannabis and alcohol were the most frequent substances detected in these violence-related deaths. Additionally, many of the contributing causes of death in this study were substance-related. Although previous studies on this population did not examine the toxicology of violence-related deaths [1, 3, 4, 22], alcohol use disorder during adolescence was identified as a risk factor for violence-related death [1]. Our findings are consistent with the association between alcohol and cannabis use and an increased risk of violence victimisation in the general population in Australia [12] and internationally [8]. Given the high prevalence of substance use disorders among justice-involved young people [10], the provision of targeted and age-appropriate therapeutic interventions to reduce harmful substance use – both in detention and in the community – may improve health and reduce violence victimisation in this population.

Strengths and limitations

This study used rigorous data linkage methods, a large whole-population cohort, and had an extended follow-up period (up to 23 years). Linking youth justice and coroner’s records improved our ascertainment of violence-related deaths among justice-involved young people, as many of the coroner’s reports did not explicitly mention the deceased’s involvement in the youth justice system [37]. Despite this, the study was limited by the small number of violence-related deaths in the cohort over the study period. While data from coroners’ investigations provided detailed information on violence-related deaths in the cohort, the information available differed between deaths, depending on a third party’s subjective assessment of its relevance, or lack thereof, to the death. Given the preventable nature of these deaths, there was a surprising lack of information reported for some variables (Table 2). Future studies may benefit from linking with police or court records to improve our understanding of the people who perpetrated the violence. Additionally, not all full-text reports were available for each death on the NCIS, which has been noted previously as a limitation of the NCIS [38]. While we linked to national death records, we examined youth justice contact in only one state in Australia (Queensland); it is unknown how representative these youth justice data are of other Australian states.

Conclusions

This study represents an important first step towards developing violence prevention interventions that are specifically designed for this population. Although, as in the general population, universal approaches that address the structural drivers of violence, such as attitudes towards women, availabilities of weapons, social inequities and racism, are also likely important to preventing these deaths. Given that the vast majority of violence-related deaths among women were in the context of intimate partner violence, interventions that prevent intimate partner violence among justice-involved young women are urgently needed. Therapeutic alcohol and other drug programs may be an effective violence prevention strategy in this population. To be effective, such programs must be available in the community as well as in detention, and must be coordinated with other essential services for this population, notably mental healthcare. There remains an urgent need to reduce the overrepresentation of Indigenous people and people of colour in the youth justice system, and to increase investment in community-based health and social services.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the nature of this research, the participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly. Queries can be directed to the corresponding author: Melissa Willoughby, mwilloughby@student.unimelb.edu.au.

References

  1. Teplin L, Jakubowski J, Abram K, Olson N, Stokes M, Welty L. Firearm homicide and other causes of death in delinquents: a 16-year prospective study. Pediatrics. 2014;134(1):63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aalsma MC, Lau KS, Perkins AJ, Schwartz K, Tu W, Wiehe SE, et al. Mortality of youth offenders along a continuum of justice system involvement. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(3):303–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coffey C, Wolfe R, Lovett AW, Moran P, Cini E, Patton GC. Predicting death in young offenders: a retrospective cohort study. Med J Aust. 2004;181(9):473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sailas ES, Feodoroff B, Lindberg NC, Virkkunen ME, Sund R, Wahlbeck K. The mortality of young offenders sentenced to prison and its association with psychiatric disorders: a register study. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16(2):193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scheyett AM, Morgan C, Lize SE, Proescholdbell S, Norwood T, Edwards D. Violent death among recently released prison inmates: stories behind the numbers. J Forensic Soc Work. 2013;3(1):69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Richards K. What makes juvenile offenders different from adult offenders? Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice. 2011. no. 409. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi409.

  7. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Global study on homicide: understanding homicide. Vienna: UNODC; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Darke S. The toxicology of homicide offenders and victims: a review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29(2):202–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Decker MR, Wilcox HC, Holliday CN, Webster DW. An integrated public health approach to interpersonal violence and suicide prevention and response. Public Health Rep. 2018;133(1_suppl):65S–79S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Borschmann R, Janca E, Willoughby M, Hughes N, Snow K, Stockings E, et al. The health of adolescents in detention: a global scoping review. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(2):e114-e126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30217-8.

  11. Pilgrim JL, Gerostamoulos D, Drummer OH. The role of toxicology interpretations in prevention of sudden death. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8(3):263–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Darke S, Duflou J. Toxicology and circumstances of death of homicide victims in New South Wales, Australia 1996–2005. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(2):447–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hedlund J, Ahlner J, Kristiansson M, Sturup J. A population-based study on toxicological findings in Swedish homicide victims and offenders from 2007 to 2009. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;244:25–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Leary J. Out of step and out of touch: Queensland's 2014 youth justice amendments. Curr Issues Crim Just. 2014;26(2):159–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. About National Death Index. Canberra, Australia. AIHW; 2018. https://www.aihw.gov.au/about-our-data/our-data-collections/national-death-index/about-national-death-index.

  16. Dunstan L. The national coronial information system: saving lives through the power of data. Aust Econ Rev. 2019;52(2):247–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kariminia A, Butler T, Corben S, Kaldor J, Levy M, Law M. Mortality among prisoners: how accurate is the Australian National Death Index? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005;29(6):572–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Draper GK, Somerford PJ, Pilkington AA, Thompson SC. What is the impact of missing indigenous status on mortality estimates? An assessment using record linkage in Western Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009;33(4):325–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kleinheksel A, Rockich-Winston N, Tawfik H, Wyatt TR. Demystifying content analysis. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(1):7113. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7113.

  20. StataCorp LLC. Stata statistical software: release 15. TX: In. College Station; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. General Record of Incidence of Mortality (GRIM) books. Canberra, Australia: AIHW; 2018. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/life-expectancy-death/grim-books/contents/general-record-of-incidence-of-mortality-grim-books.

  22. Ezell ME, Tanner-Smith EE. Examining the role of lifestyle and criminal history variables on the risk of homicide victimization. Homicide Stud. 2009;13(2):144–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia: continuing the national story. Canberra: AIHW; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Leukefeld C, Havens J, Tindall MS, Oser CB, Mooney J, Hall MT, et al. Risky relationships: targeting HIV prevention for women offenders. AIDS Educ Prev. 2012;24(4):339–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brennan IR, Moore SC. Weapons and violence: a review of theory and research. Aggr Violent Behav. 2009;14(3):215–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bartels L. Knife crime: recent data on carriage and use. Trends Issues Crime Crim Justice. 2011;417.

  27. Grimshaw R, Ford M. Young people, violence and knives: revisiting the evidence and policy discussions. London, UK: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Haylock S, Boshari T, Alexander EC, Kumar A, Manikam L, Pinder R. Risk factors associated with knife-crime in United Kingdom among young people aged 10–24 years: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hughes N, Ungar M, Fagan A, Murray J, Atilola O, Nichols K, et al. Health determinants of adolescent criminalisation. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(2):151-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30347-5.

  30. Kposowa AJ, Johnson KA. A cohort analysis of employment status and homicide victimization in the United States. Sociol Spectr. 2016;36(2):93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Siegel M: Implications of the Australian experience with firearm regulation for US gun policy. 2018.

  32. Chapman S, Alpers P, Jones M. Association between gun law reforms and intentional firearm deaths in Australia, 1979-2013. JAMA. 2016;316(3):291–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cunneen C, Tauri JM. Indigenous peoples, criminology, and criminal justice. Ann Rev Criminol. 2019;2:359–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lo CC, Howell RJ, Cheng TC. Explaining Black–White differences in homicide victimization. Aggr Violent Behav. 2013;18(1):125–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mauer M, King RS. Uneven justice: state rates of incarceration by race and ethnicity. The Sentencing Project. 2007.

  36. Ryan N, Head B, Keast R, Brown K. Engaging indigenous communities: towards a policy framework for indigenous community justice programmes. Soc Pol Admin. 2006;40(3):304–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Andrews JY, Forsyth S, Wade J, Kinner SA. Sensitivity of a national coronial database for monitoring unnatural deaths among ex-prisoners in Australia. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4(1):450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bugeja L, Ibrahim JE, Ferrah N, Murphy B, Willoughby M, Ranson D. The utility of medico-legal databases for public health research: a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications using the National Coronial Information System. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Claire Keen for her advice and support on data management and cleaning. The views expressed here are solely those of the authors and in no way reflect the view or policies of Queensland Corrective Services, Youth Justice Queensland, or the National Coronial Information System (NCIS). The coroner’s data was received from the NCIS, which is managed by the Victorian Department of Justice and Community Safety.

Funding

MW is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Postgraduate Scholarship (GNT1151103). JY receives salary and research support from a NHMRC Investigator Grant (GNT1178027). MS is a recipient of an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (project number FT180100075) funded by the Australian Government. SK receives salary support from a NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (GNT1078168). MW, JY, RB, GP, SS and SK are researchers in the NHMRC-funded Centre of Research Excellence in Driving Global Investment in Adolescent Health (GNT 1171981). The funding sources had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation, writing of the report or decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Justice Health Unit, Level 4, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Parkville, Victoria, 3053, Australia

    Melissa Willoughby, Jesse T. Young, Matthew J. Spittal, Rohan Borschmann, George Patton, Susan M. Sawyer, Emilia Janca & Stuart A. Kinner

  2. Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Melissa Willoughby, Jesse T. Young, Rohan Borschmann, George Patton, Susan M. Sawyer & Stuart A. Kinner

  3. School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

    Jesse T. Young

  4. National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

    Jesse T. Young

  5. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Katie Hail-Jares

  6. Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK

    Rohan Borschmann

  7. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Rohan Borschmann

  8. Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    George Patton & Susan M. Sawyer

  9. The Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    George Patton & Susan M. Sawyer

  10. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA

    Linda Teplin

  11. Forensic Mental Health Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia

    Ed Heffernan

  12. Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Ed Heffernan

  13. Queensland Forensic Mental Health Service, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia

    Ed Heffernan

  14. Mater Research Institute-UQ, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Stuart A. Kinner

  15. Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Stuart A. Kinner

  16. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Stuart A. Kinner

Authors
  1. Melissa Willoughby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesse T. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katie Hail-Jares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew J. Spittal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rohan Borschmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. George Patton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Susan M. Sawyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Emilia Janca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Linda Teplin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ed Heffernan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Stuart A. Kinner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MW developed the original conceptual idea of the study. MW, JY, MS, RB, and SK contributed to the design of the study. JY and KHJ curated the data. MW lead the analysis with support from JY and KHJ. MW wrote the initial draft and JY, KHJ, MS, RB, GP, SS, EJ, LT, EH, and SK contributed significantly to the interpretation of the data, and drafting and editing the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa Willoughby.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Griffith University (2016/376) and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (EO2016/3/280) Human Research Ethics Committees, and by Youth Justice Queensland and the Queensland Corrective Services Research Committee. Permissions were granted from Griffith University and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Human Research Ethics Committees, and by Youth Justice Queensland and the Queensland Corrective Services Research Committee for unconsented linkage of administrative records.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MW is an Editorial Board Member of BMC Public Health. The authors declare that they have no other competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Willoughby, M., Young, J.T., Hail-Jares, K. et al. Circumstances and toxicology of violence-related deaths among young people who have had contact with the youth justice system: a data linkage study. BMC Public Health 21, 2207 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12244-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12244-z

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us