Skip to main content

Improving body image at scale among Brazilian adolescents: study protocol for the co-creation and randomised trial evaluation of a chatbot intervention



Body image concerns are prevalent among Brazilian adolescents and can lead to poor psychological and physical health. Yet, there is a scarcity of culturally-appropriate, evidence-based interventions that have been evaluated and made widely available. Chatbot technology (i.e., software that mimics written or spoken human speech) offers an innovative method to increase the scalability of mental health interventions for adolescents. The present protocol outlines the co-creation and evaluation of a body image chatbot for Brazilian adolescents via a partnership between academics, industry organisations and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).


A two-armed fully remote randomised controlled trial will evaluate the chatbot’s effectiveness at improving body image and well-being. Adolescent girls and boys (N = 2800) aged 13–18 years recruited online will be randomly allocated (1:1) into either: 1) a body image chatbot or 2) an assessment-only control condition. Adolescents will engage with the chatbot over a 72-hour period on Facebook Messenger. Primary outcomes will assess the immediate and short-term impact of the chatbot on state- and trait-based body image, respectively. Secondary outcomes will include state- and trait-based affect, trait self-efficacy and treatment adherence.


This research is the first to develop an evidence-informed body image chatbot for Brazilian adolescents, with the proposed efficacy trial aiming to provide support for accessible, scalable and cost-effective interventions that address disparities in body image prevalence and readily available resources.

Trial registration number

NCT04825184, registered 30th March 2021.

Peer Review reports


Despite being an emerging global public mental health issue [1] body image research has largely been confined to high-income, White, English speaking populations [2, 3]. Yet, research from Asia, Africa, and South America highlights cross-cultural similarities in the expression of body image concerns. A study in 26 countries found global normative discontent, with most individuals reporting appearance dissatisfaction [4]. Understanding cross-cultural similarities, as well differences allows for the development of new and/or adaptation of extant evidence-based body image interventions for use in traditionally underserved populations. However, interventions must also be accessible, scalable and cost-effective if they are to achieve impact [5, 6]. Multi-stakeholder partnership is a key mechanism for achieving this. This paper outlines the study protocol for the co-creation and evaluation of a scalable body image chatbot (i.e., software that mimics written or spoken human speech) designed with and for Brazilian adolescents through a partnership between academics, industry organisations (beauty [Dove]; communication and technology [Talk2U]) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).

Body image in Brazil

With a population of over 212 million people ([7]), body image concerns in Brazil are common across the lifespan, particularly among adolescents. Prevalence of body image concerns range between 26.6–56% and 10.7–36% for adolescent girls and boys, respectively [8,9,10]. Concurrently, up to 10% of adolescents report engaging in disordered eating and unhealthy weight control behaviours [11, 12]. Further, consumer trends show Brazil is the leading country in diet pill consumption and cosmetic surgery, with 2.5 million surgical and non-surgical aesthetic procedures conducted annually [13]. This is concerning given that body image is a key risk factor for depressive symptoms, smoking, substance misuse and self-harm in other countries [14]. Further, cosmetic procedures incur significant financial expense and have potential medical complications [15]. Together, these findings highlight the urgency for easily-accessible, scalable, and cost-effective interventions designed to address body image concerns among Brazilian populations. At present, such interventions are limited.

Existing body image interventions in Brazil have evolved from international collaborations between Brazilian and US researchers. These include the translation and adaptation of a group-based cognitive dissonance intervention, The Body Project, which provides a forum for girls and women to challenge unrealistic appearance ideals and develop body satisfaction. The program proved effective at improving body image, negative affect and resilience to sociocultural pressures, but not disordered eating, among at risk Brazilian adolescent girls [16]. New Moves, a US program, was also adapted for use with Brazilian adolescents [17]. This school-based program used a combination of motivational interviewing and exercise and nutrition sessions to improve body dissatisfaction, self-esteem and healthy eating behaviours. Despite its efficacy in improving these outcomes among US girls, it did not lead to significant improvements in these key outcomes among Brazilian girls.

To our knowledge, no evidence-based body image intervention has been developed specifically with and for Brazilian adolescents, nor has a research group utilised technology and multi-disciplinary partnerships to develop, evaluate, disseminate and implement an intervention in Brazil. First, given that 24.3 million young people aged 9–17 years in Brazil (86% of the age range) use the internet [18], digital interventions are likely to be accepted by young people, as well as highly amenable to their lifestyles, which are increasingly digitally oriented. Second, the diverse knowledge and expertise held by the partnership stakeholders ensures that relevant insider knowledge from the respective markets are integrated into the intervention development, evaluation, implementation and dissemination frameworks; thus, making for an innovative and well-considered intervention.

Digital innovation in body image interventions

The emergence of digital interventions has increased the accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness of mental health interventions [5, 6, 19]. A review into the adaptation of face-to-face body image and eating disorder prevention interventions (e.g., psychoeducation, media literacy and cognitive dissonance) for online use show promising results. However, effects are small and significant issues with attrition and adherence are noted (Cohen’s ds .24–.42) [20, 21]. Consistent with recommendations for using disruptive innovation (e.g., ‘edutainment’; educational content within entertainment settings) and technology to scale up mental health interventions [22], researchers have begun developing and testing purpose-built digital body image interventions. Many of these interventions have been designed to be brief, standalone approaches that provide immediate (‘in-the-moment’) symptom reprieve; an intervention model referred to as ‘micro-interventions’ (e.g., audio and visual clips, online games and e-books) [23]. An advantage of micro-interventions is the ability to embed theoretically driven, evidence-based therapeutic techniques into existing digital platforms and social media networks already frequented by adolescents; thus, potentially removing barriers to dissemination and uptake [5, 6, 22].

Micro-interventions are a promising strategy for addressing mental health among Brazilian adolescents, particularly due to the high percentage of young people with internet access (86%) and a social media network (68% [18];). Recently, micro-interventions have proven effective at producing immediate and short-term body image and mental health benefits among adolescents and young adults in Australia [23], the UK [24] and the US [25]. Until now, chatbot technology has not been developed or evaluated within a micro-intervention framework [26], nor has an evidence-based micro-intervention been purpose-built for Brazilian populations. However, a recent public health initiative by UNICEF Brazil [27], reported high uptake and acceptability of a chatbot addressing sexting among adolescents, with over one million users in the first 12-months of dissemination.

Chatbot technology is a robust, low-barrier alternative to traditional mental health approaches, which are largely dependent on health professionals and services for effective implementation and dissemination [5, 6]. Chatbots are usually hosted on a website or app, with the centralised platform allowing users to engage with a variety of intervention techniques, monitor their symptoms and progress, and at times refer at-risk individuals to more appropriate mental health resources and services [26]. This independence from traditional health care approaches also allows for around the clock access and care, particularly to those who have limited mobility, live distant from health professionals and services, or are reluctant to seek mental health advice due to stigmatization [26]. Therefore, given the prevalence of body image concerns among adolescents, coupled with the scarcity of extant prevention and interventions approaches, as well as adolescent’s frequent online behaviours, chatbot technology offers a new and innovative approach to addressing these concerns at-scale.

The current trial design

This paper outlines the protocol for the co-creation and controlled evaluation of a chatbot targeting risk and protective factors for body image concerns among Brazilian adolescents. A two-arm fully remote randomised controlled trial (Fig. 1) will compare a chatbot intervention to an assessment-only control condition. Participants in the intervention condition will interact with the chatbot over a 72-h period, while participants in the control condition will receive ‘standard care’ for body image concerns among adolescents in Brazil, which at present is no intervention. This protocol paper and the randomised controlled trial design were guided by the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT; see Fig. 2 and supplementary materials) and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT [28];), including the extension for Electronic Health (CONSORT - EHEALTH [29] see supplementary guidelines).

Fig. 1

The research design according to the CONSORT EHealth guidelines

Fig. 2

Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments according to the SPIRIT guidelines

Assessment of primary and secondary trait outcomes will be conducted at baseline (T1), post-intervention (i.e., 3 days; T2), one-week (T3) and one-month follow-up (T4). Participants in the intervention condition will also be assessed on state-based body satisfaction and affect immediately after engaging with each technique. To our knowledge, this is the first chatbot to target body image among Brazilian adolescents. Therefore, a secondary aim is to assess users’ engagement and adherence. Hypotheses were formulated for overall chatbot efficacy (H1-H2), moderation effects within sub-samples (H3), and intervention engagement and adherence (H4):

  • H1: The chatbot was designed to provide immediate benefits to users. Therefore, it is anticipated that adolescents will experience improvements in state-based body satisfaction and affect at the time of engagement with the chatbot.

  • H2: Adolescents randomised into the intervention condition will experience greater improvements in trait-based body esteem, affect and body image self-efficacy at post-intervention, one-week and one-month follow-up, relative to the assessment only control condition.

  • H3: Based on previous research into the moderating effects of gender [30] and trait psychopathology [31, 32] on body image intervention effectiveness, it was hypothesized that intervention effects will be moderated by gender, and baseline levels of body esteem, affect and body image self-efficacy. Specifically, intervention effects will be greatest among: girls; girls and boys with lower levels of trait body esteem; girls and boys with higher levels of trait negative affect and body image self-efficacy.

  • H4: With regards to user engagement and adherence, given the novelty of this intervention, analyses will be of an exploratory nature. It is, however, anticipated that greater engagement and adherence with the chatbot intervention will lead to greater improvements in trait-based outcomes.


Public and patient involvement

Adolescents were involved in the research since its inception. Adolescents were recruited via UNICEF and provided input on intervention design and development (N = 37, 73% girls, age range = 13–19 years), as well as participating in user testing (see Intervention Pilot Study for participant characteristics). Research findings will be disseminated to adolescents and the wider general public via the current industry partner’ and UNICEF’s external communication networks (e.g., social media campaigns).

Eligibility criteria

The current chatbot is a universal intervention that is designed to provide population-wide benefits, irrespective of an individual’s level of risk. Therefore, increased risk for body image concerns was not an inclusion criterion for this trial. Eligible participants are adolescents aged 13–18 years old; Brazilian Portuguese speaking; Brazilian resident; and, have access to Facebook Messenger.


Intervention development and content

An evidence-based framework guided the development of the chatbot content, structure and format. This framework allowed for collaborative decision-making processes, whereby scientific theory and research, adolescents’ needs and preferences, and the expertise of project partners were considered throughout [33]. Intervention development phases and the key tasks and decision-making processes associated with these phases are reported in Table 1. These phases resulted in a chatbot, Topity, designed for delivery on the Facebook Messenger platform. The chatbot targets sociocultural risk and protective factors for body image using eight therapeutic techniques derived from cognitive and behaviour theory for body image [43]. The techniques teach adolescents how to critically analyse and evaluate media content to reduce vulnerability to negative media influences [44]; identify and challenge unhelpful thinking styles and behaviours that perpetuate body image distress [43]; and how to appreciate features and functions of the body beyond appearance [45]. A summary of the intervention topics and the associated change techniques are described in Table 2.

Table 1 Intervention development phases and associated tasks
Table 2 Chatbot Intervention Topics, Change Techniques and Steps

Intervention pilot study

A pilot study was conducted with 154 Brazilian adolescents to assess Topity’s user experience (e.g., ease of use) and acceptability (e.g., enjoyment; content relevance) prior to the main trial. Participants were 13–18-year-old girls and boys (56% girls; M = 15.67, SD = 1.62) from geographically diverse regions of Brazil, who were recruited via peer-support leaders, secondary school teachers and non-profit organisation officers known to UNICEF. Following parental consent and participant assent, adolescents were invited to engage with Topity as much as they needed over a one-week period. Adolescents assessed the chatbot on 11 acceptability factors, using 7-point response scales (e.g., 1 = not at all interesting; 7 = very interesting). Factors included: emotive response to the chatbot (e.g., enjoyment, interest, comfortability), relevance (e.g., pertinence, importance and helpfulness of the content to the user and other young people in Brazil), ease of use (e.g., speed and accuracy of responses) and willingness to recommend (e.g., how likely the user would recommend Topity to a friend and re-engage in the future). Mean scores for each item, as well as an overall acceptability score are provided in the supplementary materials. Overall, Topity was rated highly on overall user experience and acceptability across genders (girls; M = 6.40, SD = .65; boys; M = 6.0, SD = 1.03) and age (13–15 years; M = 6.41, SD = .61; 16–18 years, M = 6.07, SD = .99). Based on this feedback, no modifications were made to the chatbot prior to the main trial.


Research measures are presented in Table 3. One measure was purpose-built for the current research (i.e., body image self-efficacy). Acceptability and adherence measures were informed by existing reviews [52, 53], with remaining measures validated for use among adolescents.

Table 3 Research outcomes and internal consistencies

Participant recruitment and procedure

A community sample of 2800 adolescents aged 13–18 from diverse ethnic, geographic and socio-economic backgrounds will be recruited via a Brazilian research agency’s recruitment panels (i.e., via email to their participant databases) and via UNICEF’s online communication platforms (e.g., U-ReportFootnote 1). Recruitment will occur 2 weeks prior to the trial commencing. Given UNICEF’s reach and expertise with underserved adolescents in Brazil, the inclusion of this recruitment channel will ensure that a diverse sample is approached for participation. Further, recruitment numbers across these metrics (e.g., geography) will be regularly monitored and addressed by the research team to ensure diversity across the sample is achieved. Recruitment materials will include a link to an online screener questionnaire to determine participant eligibility. After being screened as eligible, participants will be emailed an information pack to be read with their parent or guardian. Parents will provide consent as per the Brazilian General Data Protection Law, by uploading their signature to online identification verification software that is monitored by the research agency. Following parental consent, adolescents will complete the online self-report assessment (T1), which will commence with adolescents providing informed assent. Those who do no assent will not proceed with the trial. On completion of the survey, adolescents will be randomised into one of two conditions: intervention or assessment-only. Those in the intervention condition will receive a link to the chatbot 24-hours after completing the baseline assessment. Those in the assessment-only condition will be provided with a link to the chatbot after they have completed all assessment timepoints.

Adolescents in the intervention condition will be encouraged to engage with the chatbot as much as possible over a 72-hour period. During this time, participants may complete the eight intervention techniques as many times as they like. Participants will be assessed on state body satisfaction and affect when they first enter the chatbot and immediately after engaging with a technique. If participants do not engage with the chatbot after 12-, 16 and 23.5 hours, they will receive a prompting notification that encourages engagement with the chatbot. That is, if they do not engage after the 12-hour prompt, they will receive up to two more prompts.

At completion of the 72-hour intervention period, both conditions will be assessed on primary and secondary trait outcomes immediately post-intervention and, at one-week and one-month follow-up. Those in the intervention condition will be encouraged to continue using the chatbot. Following the one-month follow-up assessment, all participants will be debriefed on study aims and objectives, and provided with mental health resources accessible in Brazil. Assessment-only participants will be invited to engage with the chatbot; however, their engagement will not be monitored or assessed. Lastly, to compensate participants for their data usage, they will receive an electronic voucher to the value of R$100 and R$80, for the intervention and control condition, respectively. Participants were not notified of the compensation value until study completion. 

Randomisation and blinding

In the present trial, adolescents will be randomised to one of two conditions based on a permuted block design, using survey software by the research agency. Randomisation will be performed on an individual level to ensure timely allocation, while maintaining a balance of participants across conditions. Participants cannot be blinded to allocation due to the behavioural nature of the two conditions; however, they will be blinded to the study aims and hypotheses. As randomisation is conducted by an external research agency, researchers will be blinded to participant allocation. Data analysts will be blinded to condition allocation (dummy coded) when conducting statistical analyses on primary and secondary trait outcomes; however, blind analyses cannot be conducted on primary and secondary state measures due to the within-group design. State and trait data will be separated into two data files to ensure blinding is maintained for trait-based measures.

Statistical power

The limited number of prior micro-interventions and insufficient detail for key parameters complicates efforts to confidently generate all required parameter estimates for power calculations. Accordingly, we adopted a Monte Carlo simulation approach that tested power across a range of combinations of key statistical parameters for multilevel modelling: within-person sample size (varying from 3 to 5 estimates per person), intraclass correlation (ICC) for outcome (ranging from .3 to .6 in recognition that ICC values tend to be large for repeated measures designs), random slope variance (choosing .01, .09, and .25 to reflect small, moderate, and large amounts of variance [54]), and effect size (setting at r = .2 to reflect small yet practically meaningful effect size [55]).

Using the SIMR (simulation-based power calculations for mixed models) package in R [56], we tested power across these different combinations of parameter estimates, with power set at .80, alpha = .05 (two-tailed), equal allocation to intervention and control arms, and conservatively allowing for 25% attrition on an initial sample of 2800 participants at the final timepoint. We note too that Hypotheses 1 and 4 are limited to the intervention arm, and thus the sample size used for those calculations was 1050 (1400 participants with 25% attrition). Using these inputs, our simulations indicated power was > .99 for all cross-level interaction effects regardless of input values, and > .80 for all within-person effects with the exception of scenarios where: (1) the random slope variance was small, or (2) a small-to-moderate random slope variance was accompanied by a small number of within-person estimates (average cluster size of 3–4). These scenarios of small random variance coupled with a small estimated effect size are unlikely based on best available evidence from past studies [23,24,25]. Thus, our sample size is likely to be sufficient across a range of plausible data scenarios.

Data analyses

At trial completion, Toluna and Talk2U will deliver password protected datafiles to the corresponding author who will clean, screen and separate state- and trait-based data for blinding purposes. Data will then be delivered to the data analysts. Analyses will be conducted in Stata. A series of linear mixed effects models will test hypotheses. H1 analyses will be limited to intervention arm participants as there is no comparable pre- and post-technique data for the assessment-only arm, while analyses for H2, H3 and H4 will include participants from both study arms.

To test H1, the immediate effects of intervention content on state-based outcomes will be explored by regressing state-based outcome measures (body satisfaction and affect) onto a time variable (0 = pre-content, 1 = post-content). For H2-H4, scores on trait-level outcome variables will be regressed onto a dummy coded time variable, with baseline as the reference category compared against post-intervention, one-week, and one-month follow-up timepoints, using random effects to allow for individual differences in amount of change in symptoms over time. Group (control = 0, intervention = 1) will be included as a cross-level moderator to test group differences in change over time (H2). The moderating effect of baseline variables on this group effect will be conducted to test H3. In evaluating H4, adherence and engagement measures will be tested as moderators of change in trait-based outcome measures over time (relative to baseline) for intervention participants. Relations among random effects of Level 1 time variables will be modelled with an unstructured covariance matrix.

Baseline differences between intervention and control participants in terms of demographic factors will be tested. Any variables shown to differ across groups will be included as covariates in analyses. Linear mixed model results will be presented in adjusted and unadjusted forms to demonstrate impact of these covariates on results.

Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, with participant data included based on group assignment at baseline. As the post-technique state-based measure is an indicator of use of the intervention resources, only instances where participants provide data for both pre- and post-technique will be included in analyses for H1. Missing data for group comparisons (H2) and baseline moderation effects (H3) will be handled using multiple imputation by chained equations with 50 imputations. Pattern mixture modelling using the mimix package [57] will be applied to determine sensitivity of results to non-ignorable missingness.

Ethical issues, approval and trial registration

The research will be conducted in accordance with the ethical standards and guidelines for conducting research with young people in Brazil. Study participation is voluntary. Prior to consent and assent, parents and participants will be provided with an information sheet outlining the research procedures and associated risks. Consent withdrawal is possible at any time without cause for justification. At study completion participants will be provided with a debrief form disclosing research aims and ancillary mental health sources.

The associated ethics committees will be informed of any severe adverse events or other unintended effects of the trial intervention. This study received ethics approval from the Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sudeste de Minas Gerais (4.232.804), Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (4.582.466), and the University of the West of England (HAS 19.12.090). The study is registered with Clinical Trials. Gov (NCT04825184; website:


Research findings will be disseminated via open-access peer reviewed publications and academic conferences, as well as beyond the scientific community. Findings will be shared through infographics and videos to interested members of the public, including on the social media platforms and websites of the Dove Self-Esteem Program, UNICEF and Talk2U. If the intervention proves effective, the chatbot will be scaled up for delivery to adolescents across Brazil via social media marketing campaigns targeting audiences directly on Facebook, Instagram and TikTok.


The current study will be the first to develop and test a chatbot that addresses risk and protective factors for body image, as well as the first to design - rather than adapt - a body image intervention specifically for Brazilian adolescents. The two-armed fully remote randomised controlled trial will assess the chatbot’s efficacy at eliciting immediate and short-term improvements in adolescents’ state- and trait-based body image, affect and self-efficacy, as well as users’ intervention engagement and adherence. At the completion of the trial, provided the chatbot is efficacious and does not require major revisions (e.g., is found ineffective or harmful), the chatbot will be made freely available to Brazilian adolescents in the latter part of 2021.

Strengths and future impact

The current research makes several advancements in addressing mental health demands of young people at-scale and builds upon previous work in innovative ways. First, our international multi-disciplinary partnership between academics, industry organisations and UNICEF provide the expertise and infrastructure to develop, evaluate and disseminate a highly scalable evidence-based intervention for adolescents. Second, collaborative decision-making processes between adolescents and project partners, as well as a small internal pilot ensured the chatbot was highly acceptable among the target audience; a key moderator of intervention efficacy [52]. Third, the chatbot is hosted on Facebook Messenger, a free and widely available online platform. Hence, intervention implementation and dissemination are independent from health professionals, services and physical locations (e.g., schools, clinics), and thus reduce barriers to health care and increase engagement among hard-to-reach populations [26]. Relatedly, a micro-intervention framework was used to develop and evaluate the chatbot; an intervention model yet to be utilised among Brazilian adolescents. Findings from this research will further our understanding of micro-intervention effectiveness at providing immediate and short-term mental health reprieve. Lastly, body image concerns are a global issue among adolescents. Therefore, if efficacious, the chatbot may be translated and adapted for use among adolescents in other cultures and countries; thus, further expanding the reach and impact of the current research.


The current study will not be without limitations, including the use of a fully remote, online randomised controlled trial design and an assessment-only control condition. Reviews into online interventions indicate that this intervention modality is associated with low adherence and high attrition rates in trials [20, 26]. These factors were considered during intervention development and research design phases. Intervention features such as check-in messages, multi-media stimuli (i.e., audio and video clips; emojis [a small digital image or icon used to express an idea or emotion]), virtual hosts and the gamification of intervention techniques were incorporated to enhance user engagement, experience and acceptability. Further, the study is sufficiently powered to detect effects within intention-to-treat and completer samples. Recruitment and data collection will be outsourced to an internationally recognised research agency who specialise in large-scale data collection; thus, ensuring the randomised controlled trial is conducted in a timely and effective manner with a nationally representative sample. Lastly, an assessment-only control condition was informed by a public health framework for assessing interventions in real world settings, and comparing them to ‘care as usual’ [58]. Given the scarcity of body image interventions for adolescents, receipt of no intervention was deemed appropriate.


The current research addresses an unmet need for scalable evidence-based body image resources for adolescents. This protocol paper describes the collaborative process used by an international multi-disciplinary partnership to develop an evidence-based body image chatbot for use among Brazilian adolescents. Further, the paper provides a detailed overview of a planned randomised controlled trial, assessing the chatbot’s efficacy on eliciting immediate and short-term improvements in adolescents’ body image and related attitudes. If proven effective, the chatbot has the potential to address adolescents’ body image concerns at-scale and therefore reduce the disparities between health-care demands and supply.

Availability of data and materials

The body image chatbot, Topity, will be freely available to those with access to Facebook Messenger. Anonymised survey data will be available on reasonable request for non-commercial purposes.


  1. 1.

    U-Report is a free tool for community participation, designed to address issues that the population cares about.



Dove self-esteem project


Intraclass correlations

H1, H2, H3, H4:

Hypothesis one, hypothesis two, hypothesis three, hypothesis four


Simulation-based power calculations for mixed models

T1, T2, T3:

Time one, time two, time three


United Nations Children’s Fund


  1. 1.

    Mental Health Foundation. Body Image: How we think and feel about our bodies. London: Mental Health Foundation; 2019. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Swami V, Airs N, Chouhan B, Amparo Padilla Leon M, Towell T. Are there ethnic differences in positive body image among female British undergraduates? Eur Psychol 2009;14(4):288–296.

  3. 3.

    Borowsky HM, Eisenberg ME, Bucchianeri MM, Piran N, Neumark-Sztainer D. Feminist identity, body image, and disordered eating. Eat Disord. 2016;24(4):297–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Swami V, Frederick DA, Aavik T, Alcalay L, Allik J, Anderson D, et al. The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: results of the international body project I. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2010;36(3):309–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kazdin AE. Addressing the treatment gap: a key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Behav Res Ther. 2017;88:7–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kazdin AE. Annual research review: expanding mental health services through novel models of intervention delivery. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019;60(4):455–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Estimativas da População. Brazil; 2020. Available from:

  8. 8.

    Amaral AC, Ferreira ME. Body dissatisfaction and associated factors among Brazilian adolescents: a longitudinal study. Body Image. 2017;22:32–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Moehlecke M, Blume CA, Cureau FV, Kieling C, Schaan BD. Self-perceived body image, dissatisfaction with body weight and nutritional status of Brazilian adolescents: a nationwide study. J Pediatr. 2020;96(1):76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Santana ML, Rita de Cássia RS, Assis AM, Raich RM, Machado ME, Pinto ED, et al. Factors associated with body image dissatisfaction among adolescents in public school students in Salvador, Brazil. Nutr Hosp. 2013;28(3):747–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Leal GV, Philippi ST, Alvarenga MD. Unhealthy weight control behaviors, disordered eating, and body image dissatisfaction in adolescents from São Paulo, Brazil. Braz J Psychiat. 2020;42(3):264–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Silva SU, Barufaldi LA, Andrade SS, Santos MA, Claro RM. Nutritional status, body image, and their association with extreme weight control behaviors among Brazilian adolescents, National Adolescent Student Health Survey 2015. Rev Braz Epidemiol. 2018;21(suppl 1):e180011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS Global Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures. 2019;16 Available from:

  14. 14.

    Bornioli A, Lewis-Smith H, Slater A, Bray I. Body dissatisfaction predicts the onset of depression among adolescent females and males: a prospective study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020;75(4):343–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Griffiths D, Mullock A. Cosmetic surgery: regulatory challenges in a global beauty market. Health Care Anal. 2018;26(3):220–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Amaral AC, Stice E, Ferreira ME. A controlled trial of a dissonance-based eating disorders prevention program with Brazilian girls. Psicol Refl Crít. 2019;32:32–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dunker KL, Claudino AM. Preventing weight-related problems among adolescent girls: a cluster randomized trial comparing the Brazilian ‘new moves’ program versus observation. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018;12(1):102–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Regional Center for Studies on the Development of the Information Society - Comite Gestor de Internet no Brasil. Survey on Internet use by Children and Adolescents in Brazil: TIC Kids Online Brasil; 2018. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hollis C, Falconer CJ, Martin JL, Whittington C, Stockton S, Glazebrook C, et al. Annual research review: digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems–a systematic and meta-review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58(4):474–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wade TD, Wilksch SM. Internet eating disorder prevention. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018;31(6):456–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Beatty L, Binnion C. A systematic review of predictors of, and reasons for, adherence to online psychological interventions. Int J Behav Med. 2016;23(6):776–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kazdin AE. Innovations in psychosocial interventions and their delivery: leveraging cutting-edge science to improve the world's mental health: Oxford University Press; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Richardson B, Lewis V, Linardon J, Mills J, Juknaitis K, et al. A randomized trial exploring mindfulness and gratitude exercises as eHealth-based micro-interventions for improving body satisfaction. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;95:58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Atkinson MJ, Diedrichs PC. Examining the efficacy of video-based microinterventions for improving risk and protective factors for disordered eating among young adult women. Int J of Eat Disord. 2020;54(5):708–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Matheson EL, Lewis-Smith H, Diedrichs PC. The effectiveness of brief animated films as a scalable micro-intervention to improve children’s body image: a randomised controlled trial. Body Image. 2020;35:142–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Abd-Alrazaq AA, Rababeh A, Alajlani M, Bewick BM, Househ M. Effectiveness and safety of using Chatbots to improve mental health: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e16021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    UNICEF. Projecto Caretas - adolescents and the risk of leaking intimate images on the internet: UNICEF; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Eysenbach G, Consort-EHEALTH Group. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Diedrichs PC, Atkinson MJ, Steer RJ, Garbett KM, Rumsey N, Halliwell E. Effectiveness of a brief school-based body image intervention ‘dove confident me: single Session’when delivered by teachers and researchers: results from a cluster randomised controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2015;74:94–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Alleva JM, Sheeran P, Webb TL, Martijn C, Miles E. A meta-analytic review of stand-alone interventions to improve body image. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0139177.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Matheson EL, Smith HG, Lewis-Smith H, Arbon RE, Diedrichs PC. Game on! A randomised controlled trial evaluation of playable technology in improving body satisfaction and negative affect among adolescents new media & society. 2021:1461444821993800.

  33. 33.

    Spring B, Hitchcock K. Evidence-based practice. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. 2010:1–4.

  34. 34.

    UNICEF. Workshops with adolescents on self-esteem and body confidence. Brazil: UNICEF; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Baumel A, Fleming T, Schueller SM. Digital Micro interventions for behavioral and mental health gains: Core components and conceptualization of digital Micro intervention care. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e20631.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Diedrichs PC, Atkinson MJ, Garbett KM, Leckie G. Evaluating the “dove confident me” five-session body image intervention delivered by teachers in schools: a cluster randomized controlled effectiveness trial. J Adolesc Health. 2020;68(2):331–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cash T. The body image workbook: an eight-step program for learning to like your looks: New Harbinger Publications; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Alleva JM, Martijn C, Van Breukelen GJ, Jansen A, Karos K. Expand your horizon: a programme that improves body image and reduces self-objectification by training women to focus on body functionality. Body Image. 2015;15:81–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yager Z, Diedrichs PC, Drummond M. Understanding the role of gender in body image research settings: participant gender preferences for researchers and co-participants in interviews, focus groups and interventions. Body Image. 2013;10(4):574–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Prescott J, Hanley T, Ujhelyi K. Peer communication in online mental health forums for young people: directional and nondirectional support. JMIR Ment Health. 2017;4(3):e29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining" gamification". In: In proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments; 2011. p. 9–15.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Cugelman B. Gamification: what it is and why it matters to digital health behavior change developers. JMIR Serious Games. 2013;1(1):e3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cash TF. Body image: cognitive behavioral perspectives on body image. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, editors. Body images: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2002. p. 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Aufderheide P. Media Literacy. A Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. Washington, DC.: Aspen Institute, Communications and Society Program; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Menzel JE, Levine MP. Embodying experiences and the promotion of positive body image: The example of competitive athletics. In: Calogero RM, Tantleff-Dunn S, Thompson JK, editors. Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions: APA; 2011. p. 163–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Smith HG, Garbett K, Matheson EL, Amaral ACS, Meireles JFF, Almeida MC, et al. The body esteem scale for adults and adolescents: translation, adaption and psychometric validation among adolescents in Brazil. Forthcoming. 2021.

  47. 47.

    Mendelson BK, Mendelson MJ, White DR. Body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults. J Pers Assess. 2001;76(1):90–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Damásio BF, Pacico JC, Poletto M, Koller SH. Refinement and psychometric properties of the eight-item Brazilian positive and negative affective schedule for children (PANAS-C8). J Happiness Stud. 2013;14(4):1363–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Bandura A. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. 2006;5:307–7.

  50. 50.

    McCusker J, Lambert SD, Cole MG, Ciampi A, Strumpf E, Freeman EE, et al. Activation and self-efficacy in a randomized trial of a depression self-care intervention. Health Educ Behav. 2016;43(6):716–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Williams GC, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(10):1644–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Linardon J, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. Attrition and adherence in smartphone-delivered interventions for mental health problems: a systematic and meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020;88(1):1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Arend MG, Schäfer T. Statistical power in two-level models: a tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychol Methods. 2019;24(1):1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ferguson CJ. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2009;40(5):532–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Green P, MacLeod CJ. SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods Ecol Evol. 2016;7(4):493–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Cro S, Morris TP, Kenward MG, Carpenter JR. Reference-based sensitivity analysis via multiple imputation for longitudinal trials with protocol deviation. Stata J. 2016;16(2):443–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Gamerman V, Cai T, Elsäßer A. Pragmatic randomized clinical trials: best practices and statistical guidance. Health Serv Outcome Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank numerous organisations and individuals for their valued contribution to this project. First, we are very grateful to the young people of Brazil who provided valuable feedback during intervention development and user testing. Second, we thank our project partners at the Dove Self-Esteem Project, UNICEF Brazil, and UNICEF UK. Third, we thank the entire Talk2U team for building the chatbot, including the narrative design, the audio-visual production and translation of the intervention techniques. Fourth, we wish to acknowledge Toluna, a research agency in Brazil, for assisting with recruitment design for the proposed randomised controlled trial. Last but not least, we would like to thank our colleagues at the Centre for Appearance Research for their ongoing feedback and support on this project.


This study was funded by a research grant from the Dove Self-Esteem Project (Unilever; HAS-HSS-19-097). The funders had no role in data analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation. The Dove Self-Esteem Project (Unilever) were permitted to review the manuscript and suggest changes, but the authors exclusively retained the final decision on content. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Unilever.

Author information




All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with its submission to BMC Public Health. Authors contributions are categorised as per the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) guidelines. EM: Conceptualisation; Methodology; Resources; Writing - Original Draft; Writing – Review and Editing; Visualisation; Supervision; (lead) Project Administration; Funding Acquisition. HS: Conceptualisations; Resources; Writing – Review and Editing; Project Administration. ACSA: Conceptualisation; Resources; Writing – Review and Editing. JFFM: Conceptualisation; Resources; Writing – Review and Editing. MCA: Conceptualisation; Resources; Writing – Review and Editing. GM: Conceptualisation; Resources; Writing – Review and Editing. CL: Conceptualisation; Resources; Writing – Review and Editing. GG: Methodology; Software; Resources; Writing – Review and Editing. NF: Methodology; Software; Resources; Writing – Review and Editing. LSB: Methodology; Software; Resources; Writing – Review and Editing. JL: Conceptualisation; Formal analysis; Writing – Review and Editing. MFT: Conceptualisation; Formal analysis; Writing – Review and Editing. PCD: Conceptualisation; Methodology; Writing – Review and Editing; Supervision; Funding Acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. L. Matheson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has received ethical approval from the Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sudeste de Minas Gerais (4.232.804), Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (4.582.466), and the University of the West of England (HAS 19.12.090). Informed parental and participant consent will be obtained prior to participation. Participation is voluntary and participant withdrawal is possible at any stage of the research without justification. Research findings and the intervention will be disseminated via open access peer-reviewed papers, conference presentations, and via social media campaigns.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

This research was externally funded by a commercial funder (Dove Self-Esteem Project; Unilever). PD is an independent consultant to the Dove Self-Esteem Project global education initiative. PD was on the Dove Self-Esteem Project Global Advisory Board from 2013 to 2016. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest in relation to this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matheson, E.L., Smith, H.G., Amaral, A.C.S. et al. Improving body image at scale among Brazilian adolescents: study protocol for the co-creation and randomised trial evaluation of a chatbot intervention. BMC Public Health 21, 2135 (2021).

Download citation


  • Adolescent
  • Body image
  • Mental health
  • Chatbot
  • Micro-intervention
  • Brazil
  • Low- and middle-income countries
  • Randomised controlled trial
  • Study protocol