Skip to main content

Does workplace social capital predict care quality through job satisfaction and stress at the clinic? A prospective study



Welfare societies like Sweden face challenges in balancing the budget while meeting the demand for good quality healthcare. The aim of this study was to analyse whether care quality, operationalized as survival of dental fillings, is predicted by workplace social capital and if this effect is direct or indirect (through stress and/or job satisfaction among staff at the clinic), controlling for patient demographics.


The prospective design includes A) work environment data from surveys of 75 general public dental clinics (aggregated data based on 872 individual ratings), and B) register-based survival of 9381dental fillings performed during a 3-month period around the time of the survey, and C) patient demographics (age, gender, income level and birth place). Using a multi-level discrete-time proportional hazard model, we tested whether clinic-level social capital, stress, and job satisfaction could predict tooth-level filling failure, controlling for patient demographics. One direct and two indirect pathways, moderated by filling tooth, location, and filling type, were tested.


High workplace social capital reduced the risk of early failure of fillings in molar teeth, mediated by group-perceived job satisfaction (indirect path: OR = 0.93, p < .05, direct path from job satisfaction: OR = 0.89, p < .05). Contrary to expectations, we found no support for a direct effect from social capital on care quality or for the indirect pathway via stress at the clinic level.


Workplace social capital boosted the quality of dental fillings through increased levels of job satisfaction. In addition, staff at clinics with higher social capital reported less stress and higher levels of job satisfaction. These results indicate that promotion of social capital may improve both occupational health and care quality.

Peer Review reports


The cost of healthcare in Sweden has increased from 5.5% of GNP in 1970 to 11.0% in 2019 [1], which illustrates the major challenges in welfare societies of balancing the budget while meeting the demand for high quality healthcare [2, 3]. In the US, a framework for the improvement of healthcare (the Triple Aim Principle) was adopted 2008 and has been widely implemented as part of the national healthcare strategy. The primary aim of the framework is that healthcare institutions will work to improve public health through simultaneously enhancing patient experience and reducing per capita cost [2]. In order to build high-quality healthcare services, however, attention also needs to be directed to the work environment and occupational health of the healthcare providers, i.e., the Triple Aim can be expanded to the Quadruple Aim Principle [4]. In line with these strategies for healthcare improvement, the Swedish government established the “Delegation for Trust-Based Public Management” in 2016 with the goal of enhancing care quality by promoting more trust-based governance and management of welfare services. This idea of trust in relationships is a central component across various operationalizations of workplace social capital, particular in the Nordic countries (i.e., [5,6,7,8,9]). Oksanen et al. distinguish between a vertical dimension (e.g., relationships between managers and employees) and a horizontal dimension (e.g., relationships among employees at same hierarchical level) of workplace social capital [9], while Clausen et al. operate with four dimensions (linking (between managers and employees), bridging (between different work teams), bonding (within a work team) and overall social capital) [8]. In the third version of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire, COPSOQ III, however, workplace social capital is operationalized as a collaborative work climate characterized by mutual trust (vertical and horizontal) and justice [6, 7].

Social capital in the workplace predicts motivational and health-related outcomes, e.g. job satisfaction, work engagement, sickness absence, workability, and psychological wellbeing [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], as well as self-rated performance [8, 19]. The work environment can affect quality of care either indirectly (that is, via factors like stress and job satisfaction that may affect professional behaviour) or directly (that is, the work environment or staffing issues can promote systematic errors or compromise quality) [20]. In the present study we will investigate the relationships between workplace social capital, job satisfaction, and stress and the impact on longevity of dental fillings, a register-based indicator of care quality in the context of dentistry.

To understand how social capital in the workplace works in dentistry, it is important to understand how dentistry is typically organized. In familiar contexts like hospital work, during a typical work week, any particular staff member might work in different teams (i.e. operating room, outpatient clinic, and ward) in their department, and the work can take place at any time of day or night in different shifts. This mobility makes it difficult to clearly define small, separate work teams in the hospital setting. In contrast, the organization of dentistry is less complex. Dentistry has well-defined, geographically separated and relatively small, locally managed workplaces and access to registers that include objective measures of care quality. Having small, restricted teams makes dentistry a suitable setting for studies on workplace social capital. Typically, the local leader of clinics has an educational background in dentistry and takes part in clinical work. The unidimensional measure of workplace social capital suggested by COPSOQ III [6, 7] fits well to the context of dentistry, because there is a small power distance between employees and the local manager in clinics, and these clinics are mutually independent.

Throughout Europe, healthcare workers (more often than workers in other sectors) report insufficient time for task completion, frequent interruptions, exposure to angry clients, emotionally disturbing situations, and a need to hide their emotions (p 50 in [21]). An intense work environment is also characteristic for dentistry workplaces, because demands are high and many employees experience high levels of work-related stress [22, 23]. In various healthcare settings, links have been repeatedly made between poor wellbeing outcomes for workers and poor patient safety outcomes (for review, see [24]), but to date, little research has investigated the link between worker stress and care quality in dentistry [25].

Dental caries (also known as tooth decay or cavities) is the most common oral disease and a significant segment of the global burden of disease [26]. The standard treatment for dental caries is dental fillings, but despite extensive technical research into filling materials, the longevity of fillings is still a matter of concern [27]. A review of the findings of long-term clinical studies concluded that the main problem of filling failure goes beyond the materials – the issues also extend to factors related to the care providers and patients [28]. Dental filling is a complex task involving many steps that require careful attention if the optimal technical properties are to be reached. If there is insufficient time for staff to complete all tasks accurately, these properties will not be reached and the filling might eventually need replacement [28]. Collaboration with the patient can also become complicated because stress from the patient can spill over to the dental team and vice versa [29]. Dentists in high-pressure workplaces report that their clinical decision making is sometimes compromised [30, 31], a finding consistent with a small-scale experimental study in which time pressure reduced the quality of dentists’ diagnostic performances [32]. We have found no previous studies investigating the influence of perceived stress, as experienced at the clinic level, on the quality of dental fillings. Therefore, the present study will address this gap and explore the association between workplace stress and dental filling failure. We anticipate that high stress reported by an entire staff-group will implicate an increased risk of early failures of dental fillings, especially for fillings requiring the most complicated work procedures.

While dentistry can be emotionally demanding and often stressful, the job also confers feelings of meaningfulness, professional pride, engagement, and job satisfaction, especially in working conditions that support opportunities for providing high quality care [33, 34]. The Happy Worker Hypothesis, which has its roots in the Hawthorne studies from the beginning of the last century [35], claims that satisfied workers perform better and are more productive [36]. Today, this hypothesis is central to the positive organisational psychology movement and is considered to be the ‘Holy Grail’ of management research [37]. Frederickson’s broaden-and-build framework [38] can be used to explain this Happy Worker hypothesis: When employees are satisfied and psychologically well, it is more likely that they will have the resources necessary for better job performance [37]. It has repeatedly been found that job satisfaction and work engagement of the individual care provider lead to higher productivity and better quality (for an overview see e.g. [36]) and that work engagement is associated with dentist productivity [39]. Previous studies have mainly addressed these issues at the individual level [40], but Taris and Schreurs [41] found partial support for the model also at the organizational level. Gain spirals can arise from job resources to engagement and work-unit innovation, e.g. constantly making improvements at the dental clinic [42]. In line with this, we hypothesize that overall job satisfaction level at the clinic will be associated with a reduced risk of early failures of dental fillings, in particularly for fillings requiring complicated work procedures.

Finally, workplace social capital could also be important for the longevity of dental fillings, because dentistry relies on teams composed of staff members with different occupational backgrounds that communicate, collaborate and coordinate many tasks in relation to patients during a workday. Dentists consider interpersonal trust-based relationships and good communication to be fundamental for the team to provide high quality dental care [33]. Previous research has shown that social capital leads to a higher engagement in clinical improvements [12], more helping behaviours [43], and can be a buffer in emotionally demanding situations [44]. Further, the organisational justice climate at dental clinics is of importance for how staff members rate the care quality [45]. For these reasons, we expect workplace social capital will correspond to an increased longevity of dental fillings made at the clinic, and for there to be an indirect effect through job satisfaction and stress among the staff.

Aim/research question

The overall objective is to investigate the relationship between work environment factors at the clinic level and dental care quality. More concretely, we will analyse whether longevity of dental fillings are linked with workplace social capital and whether any indirect effect can be measured by the average level of stress or job satisfaction among staff at the clinic, controlling for the potential confounding effects of patient demographic factors.

Specifically, we hypothesize that:

  1. 1.

    Higher levels of workplace social capital will be associated with higher average levels of job satisfaction and lower average levels of stress at the clinics.

  2. 2.

    Higher levels of job satisfaction at clinics lead to a lower risk of patients experiencing early filling failure.

  3. 3.

    Higher levels of stress at the clinics lead to a higher risk of patients experiencing early filling failure.

  4. 4.

    Higher levels of workplace social capital will indirectly (via average levels of job satisfaction and stress at the clinic) lead to a lower chance of early filling failure.

  5. 5.

    Characteristics of the dental filling (filling tooth, location, and filling type) will moderate the potential effect of work environment on the risk of early filling failure. We expect that the more complicated the filling procedure is due to local conditions in the mouth, the more the risk of an early failure of the filling will be influenced by work environment.


This study has a prospective design including baseline work environment data from surveys on dental clinics and register-based follow-up of dental care quality and patient demographics.

Participants and materials

Questionnaire data on the work environment was collected 2014–2015 among staff at all public dental practices in four regions of Sweden. Inclusion criteria for the present study were general dental practices, a minimum of 2 practitioners at the clinic, and a minimum of 3 staff members in total who had responded to the work environment survey. Data from 75 general public dental clinics, based on 872 individual ratings from non-managerial employees, are included in the analyses and with a response rate of 73% after two reminders.

Social capital at the clinic was operationalised by the COPSOQ III [6, 7, 46] by 6 items addressing trust in relationships and organisational justice rated on a 5-point Likert scale. An additive index scale was constructed and converted to a metric score range 0–100 [7]. For each clinic, an average scale score was calculated. Stress (4 items) and Job satisfaction (4 items) by COPSOQ II [47, 48] were rated on 5-point Likert scales. Additive index scales ranging from 0 to 100 were constructed, setting the scale scores as missing if respondents had answered fewer than two items on a scale and aggregated to clinic scores.

Outcome data on dental care quality, operationalized as survival of dental fillings, were obtained from the Swedish Quality Registry for Caries and Periodontal Disease, SKaPa. For patients aged 20 or older, all class 2 and 3 composite fillings in premolars and molars that were made at the clinics across 3 months; a month prior, the month of, and the month following the work environment survey, and then also followed for up to 4 years. The analyses of how the work environment affects care quality could be confounded by systematic variation among clinics in regard to patient characteristics, so for that reason, demographic background data on the age, gender, income level and place of birth of the patients were obtained from Statistics Sweden. As suggested by a 13-year observation study, moderating local factors could be filling tooth (molar or premolar), location (lower jaw or upper jaw), or filling type (3 or 2 surfaces included in the filling) [49].


Using a multi-level discrete-time proportional hazard model analysis with moderation in Mplus v8, we tested the effect of work environment on filling failure (see Fig. 1). Specifically, we tested the direct and indirect effects of clinic-level (level 2) social capital, stress, and job satisfaction on the probability of experiencing a filling failure at the tooth level (level 1), controlling for patient demographics (e.g., patient age, gender (male), education (three levels), income (strata of 100,000 SEK per year), and country of birth (Scandinavia/other)). The two indirect pathways were from social capital to filling failure through stress and through job satisfaction. These indirect pathways also included moderation. We tested the moderated pathways from job satisfaction to filling failure, and stress to filling failure, by filling tooth, location, and filling type. Moderation was tested by creating interactions with the slopes command in the ‘Model’ section of analysis.

Fig. 1

The findings for the proposed model from work environment at the clinic level (n = 75) to patients filling failure (n = 9381) with indirect paths to failure through stress and job satisfaction with filling tooth moderation, controlling for age, gender, education level, income, and country of birth. Note: r = linear regression, OR = odds ratio

Work environment factors (social capital, stress, and job satisfaction) were clustered at the clinic level (Level 2, see Table 1 for intraclass co-efficient (ICC) scores), and filling failure was at the tooth level (Level 1). To justify aggregating the individual-level scales scores for social capital, stress and job satisfaction to an average clinic score, the ICC(1) and ICC(2) were calculated along with rwg(j). ICC(1) represents the amount of variance in the employees’ responses that can be explained by the clinic they work in [50,51,52,53]; in applied field research of organisations, these values are typically up to a maximum of 0.20 (p 362 in [51]. ICC(1) values of 0.05 can be considered a small to medium effect while higher values indicate stronger effects [53]. ICC(2) is an estimate of the reliability of the aggregated group means [50,51,52]. Values < 0.5 indicate poor reliability, 0.50–0.75 indicate moderate reliability and > 0.75 indicate good reliability of group-level means [54]. Finally, rwg(j) reflects the consistency in response within the groups, that is, the extent to which there is within-group agreement in the workplace [51], with values of 0.70 or above generally considered to be acceptably consistent with other measures of reliability [55]. Overall, the ICC scores and rwg(j) scores indicate whether it is appropriate to aggregate the individual level scales. While values for job satisfaction and stress fell just shy of the 0.50 recommendation for ICC(2) values, there were reasonable values for ICC(1) and rwg(j) (Table 1).

Table 1 Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and scale characteristics for the three work environment measures

All three work environment factors were entered as observed variables in the model, and failure of filling was constructed as a latent variable. The filling failure latent variable comprised our three binary event indicators (year 1, year 2, and year 3) which corresponded to three time periods. If our event of interest (filling failure) occurred, scores were coded as 1; if our event of interest did not occur (no filling failure), scores were coded as 0. Once the event of interest occurred, the remaining event indicators for the subsequent time periods were coded as missing. The latent loadings for filling failure were constrained to 1 (consistent with a proportional hazard model), and the variance of filling failure variance was constrained to 0.

Using Maximum Likelihood Restricted (MLR) estimation consistent with proportional hazard models, we tested the linear regression pathways from social capital to stress and to job satisfaction, and the logit regression pathways from social capital, stress, and job satisfaction onto filling failure. Social capital, stress, and job satisfaction were all standardized via the DEFINE command in Mplus prior to analysis to provide standardized coefficients for both the linear regression and logit regression pathways. Finally, all logit regression coefficients were converted to Odds Ratio coefficients.

Two models testing the pathways from workplace social capital to filling failure via stress and job satisfaction, moderated by filling tooth, filling location and filling type, were tested. If we were to follow the causal method of mediation outlined by Baron and Kenny [56], a direct path from the predictor to the outcome would need to be established. Of note, the causal approach has recently drawn criticism due to its lack of power and statistical parsimony through the increased number of null hypotheses requiring rejection and consequent increased chances of making a type 2 error [57]. Additionally, the causal approach can prematurely reject an indirect effect if there is a mediator with a positive impact (e.g., stress) and a mediator with a negative impact (e.g., job satisfaction) that cancel each other out in the direct effect [57]. For these reasons, consistent with Hayes [57], our indirect effect does not require an association between the predictor variable (social capital) and the outcome variable (filling failure probability) [58].

Model 1 included the indirect paths from social capital at the clinic level (Level 2) to filling failure at the tooth level (Level 1) via job satisfaction and stress while controlling for patient demographic information and correlating stress and job satisfaction error terms. The pathways from social capital, job satisfaction, and stress were moderated by filling type, size, and location in the mouth. In Model 2, a direct pathway from social capital to filling failure was added with all else held consistent. To measure model fit we used three fit indices, namely 2*Loglikelihood (Deviance), the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC), and sample-size adjusted Bayesian Information Criteria (AdjBIC). For all fit indices, lower scores indicate better model fit. To compare the fit between models, we used the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square test (TRd) [59], which uses the deviance scores and correction factors across the two comparison models to detect significant differences [60].


Over the course of this study, a total of 8505 patients received 9997 dental fillings fulfilling the inclusion criteria, and we were able to include 8278 of these in the study (1719 fillings were omitted because due to missing data for filling longevity). Most patients received either one (85.9%) or two fillings (11.5%). Fillings in molar teeth were most frequent (61.8%), and among these, 20.8% needed a replacement during the observation period.

The average age of patients was 50.2 years (SD 15.7), 50.1% were women, 90.5% were born in a Scandinavian country, and the average total yearly income was SEK 296,161 (SD 161,276) (100 SEK was equivalent to 9.1 USD on 2 January 2017). The highest education levels of the patients were 28.9% at the primary level, 37.9% at the secondary level and 27.1% had some higher education; the educational level was unknown for 6.1%.

The tests of Model 1 showed, as expected, that social capital was positively associated with job satisfaction and negatively associated with stress (cf. Figure 1). In this model, on the pathway from social capital to filling failure through job satisfaction and stress, it was found that increases in job satisfaction were associated with a decreased risk of filling failure (OR = 0.89, 95%CI [0.81, 0.99], p < .05). Additionally, the indirect path from social capital to filling failure through job satisfaction was significant (OR = 0.93, 95%CI [0.87, 0.998], p < .05). No path was found from stress to filling failure. In Model 2, a direct path from workplace social capital to filling failure was added. However, the direct path from social capital to filling failure was not significant. Overall, using the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-squared test, no significant difference was found between the two models (TRd (1) = 0.62, p = 0.431,) indicating that the addition of a direct pathway did not improve model fit (Table 2).

Table 2 Model fit and comparison of work environment to filling failure in dental clinics

The only significant moderation on the association between job satisfaction and filling failure was of type of tooth getting the filling (OR = 0.95, 95%CI [0.90, 0.99], p < .05). For molar teeth, this association was statistically significant (OR = 0.88, 95%CI [0.80, 0.96], p < .05), but not for premolar teeth (OR = 0.93, 95%CI [0.80, 1.06], p = .405). No significant moderation was found for filling type or filling location for the pathways from stress and job satisfaction onto filling failure, and filling tooth on the pathway between stress and filling failure (p > .05).

Figure 2 presents the cumulative survival probability for fillings on molars, as a function of clinic-level rated job satisfaction. With low and medium levels of clinic-level job satisfaction, the cumulative survival probability drops at a faster rate than it does for high job satisfaction. Clinics with high levels of staff job satisfaction had consistently higher levels of survival probability across the three discrete time periods.

Fig. 2

Cumulative survival probabilities of fillings for molar teeth based on clinic-level assessments of job satisfaction. Note: low job satisfaction is 2 SD below the mean, medium job satisfaction is the mean level job satisfaction, and high job satisfaction is 2 SD above the mean


This study is the first to investigate whether work environment factors can predict dental care quality. We investigated the relationships among workplace social capital, job satisfaction, and stress at dental clinics, and the impact that these factors have on a register-based indicator of care quality. Our main finding was that increases in workplace social capital reduced the risk of early failure of fillings in molar teeth, and that this effect was indirect, taking effect through group-perceived job satisfaction at the clinic. Against expectations, social capital was not found to have a direct effect on early failure of fillings. This lack of a direct effect does not detract from our main finding of social capital playing a role in early filling failure through job satisfaction, because the approach to testing mediation does not require (mathematically or theoretically) a significant direct pathway from the predictor to the outcome. Overall, our main finding corroborates previous research, which has found that social capital leads to job satisfaction [8, 11,12,13, 19] and to better self-reported performance [8, 19].

Social capital was associated with job satisfaction and stress at the clinic level. That is, clinics that had higher levels of social capital had staff with more job satisfaction and less stress. This pathway from social capital to job satisfaction has received consistent support at the individual and at the organizational level [8, 11,12,13, 19]. Furthermore, consistent with our own findings, there is also support for the influence of social capital on the health of workers [10, 13, 16, 18]. The amount of variance in social capital attributed to the clinical level supports the notion that social capital is an upstream factor that can drive either a positive, motivating path or a negative, health deteriorating path, corresponding to, for example, the Psychosocial Safety Climate [61].

Our finding that high job satisfaction at the clinic level predicts a lower probability of early filling failure (which is an indicator of high care quality) is in accordance with previous organizational level research. For example, a recent review of the Happy Worker Hypothesis at work-unit level using longitudinal design research demonstrated consistent, although scarce, evidence that work-unit wellbeing predicts sales or other economic measures of work-unit performance (although to the best of our knowledge, no studies have addressed the quality of the performed work) [40]. Also corroborated by our findings, a test of the pathway from employee satisfaction to multiple dimensions of performance (e.g., customer satisfaction and worker productivity) using data from home care organisations found that job satisfaction predicted care quality, and that organisations with a high employee satisfaction also had higher levels of customer satisfaction [41]. Interestingly, however, that investigation did not find a clear link from employee satisfaction to productivity. This result can be interpreted as meaning that organizations with high employee satisfaction allow staff to focus on quality performance without the need to increase the sheer amount of work performed. Our findings corroborate the idea that job satisfaction plays a role in providing quality outcomes.

Contrary to our expectations, we did not find support for the proposed pathway from stress at the clinic level to care quality. The same study as referenced above found that the average level of emotional exhaustion was related to reduced customer satisfaction and also to reduced productivity [41]. Meaningfulness and pride in dental work is closely related to delivering high care quality in the clinical encounter with patients [33]. As has been demonstrated in prior research, dentists and dental nurses working in fast-paced environments tend to compromise on ergonomics and administrative tasks rather than lower the quality of treatment [62]. Hence, it could be that worker stress at the clinics in this study did not reach a level that threatened the quality of care in terms of filling longevity. Instead, the dental staff might have compromised on the quality of their own ergonomics or administrative tasks, or perhaps they slowed down the work pace to maintain the quality of their performance in the face of stress.

We included three potential moderating local factors concerning size of filling and placement in the mouth because we expected that the higher risk of failure in general, the more likely it would be to find that work environmental factors affected work results. In a recent 13-year follow-up study on dental filling longevity, survival analyses revealed that the most important factor affecting survival of composite fillings was if the filling was placed in molar versus premolar teeth, and in particular during the first years after it is made [49]. Accordingly, and taking the limited statistical power of our study into consideration, it is not surprising that our findings applied to molar teeth only.


Recently there has been much research on social capital, and all indications are that social capital in the workplace is important for predicting employee health and wellbeing [8, 10, 13], work ability [14, 15], use of antidepressant medicine [16], long-term absence due to illness [18], and retention of healthcare staff [11]. However, proposing useful actions based on surveys of psychosocial factors is more challenging than handling physical risk factors at workplaces. Workplace leaders and their relationships with employees are key social factors in the work environment and for implementing organizational policies and strategies. A systematic approach integrating occupational health and safety management with other organizational processes, such as strategic planning, is crucial for success [63]. Previous research has pointed to the importance of managing dentistry in a way that respects the professional ethos of dentists [62], and this importance of social capital is in line with a professional ethos that emphasises trust-based relationships. Furthermore, it has been shown to be possible to intervene to increase social capital through targeted processes [64].

For patients, employees, organizations, and society, it is of great importance that dental fillings are of a quality that ensures their longevity, and that dental healthcare staff thrive in their work. In line with findings from a population study from Finland [49], we found that one out of five fillings in molars was replaced within 3 years of being first made. Every time a filling is replaced, the tooth becomes a little weaker, and filling replacement is also associated with economic, emotional, and physical costs. An increase in workplace social capital leading to a single standard deviation worth of a higher average level of job satisfaction is an achievable goal for organizations and corresponds to the established level of 5–10 points being a minimally important score difference for most COPSOQ scales [65]. Even if the clinical work environment is improved a small amount, that improvement would have the potential for a substantial improvement of public health. Social capital is related to less stress and improved job satisfaction among employees as well as better outcomes for the patients. Therefore, workplace social capital can be a relevant consideration for pursuing the Quadruple Aim Principle [4] in practice.

Theoretically, our findings suggest that the Happy Worker Hypothesis can be extended to the group level, in that workplaces where workers are satisfied with their job produce better quality output.

Strengths and limitations

The main advantage of the present study is that it combines questionnaire and prospective register data which has the effect of 1) eliminating the risk of common methods bias between exposures and outcomes, and 2) providing an indicator of care quality based on objective criteria rather than subjective staff or patient ratings. The research design furthermore made it possible to integrate additional socioeconomic patient data from Statistics Sweden and thus control for potential confounding factors due to differences in patient characteristics at different clinics.

Another advantage is that the workplace surveys were based on an internationally recognized, validated instrument for risk assessment at workplaces [46]. The international recognition and validation add to the credibility of the measurement and facilitates a transfer of research findings to practical use in the workplace. From the surveys, we included measures aggregated from individual ratings to the clinic level, which provides a more accurate and objective estimate of the levels of social capital in the working environment and of the collective experience of stress and job satisfaction. In this study, the reliability (i.e., ICC2) for the aggregated group means was good for workplace social capital, while slightly below acceptable for job satisfaction and stress (according to criteria suggested by Koo & Li [54]). The amount of variance in the employees’ responses that could be explained by the clinic they work at was the typical maximum seen in applied field research of organisations (p 362 in [51]), and a small to medium effect was seen for stress and job satisfaction (according to the criteria suggested by LeBreton & Senter [53]). In terms of within-group agreement in the workplace, there appeared to be a reaonsable level of consistency in response from employees within a particular workplace for all measures of job satisfaction, stress, and social capital (in accordance with the general rule of thumb for reliability [55]). The ethical permission obtained for the present study did not allow for a study design to include individual-level work environmental factors. The amount of variance left to be explained at individual level, however, makes this relevant to consider in the future.

A limitation is that while early filling failure was measured at three points in time, we only looked at the cross-sectional relationships regarding the working environment factors. For that reason, we are unable to conclusively establish the direction of the pathways among the work environment factors. In addition, the study is based on a relatively small sample of workplaces, which implies a limited statistical power.

In future studies it will be important to replicate this study in different settings and in relation to various working conditions and using different indicators of quality. In particular, it will be relevant to have repeated measures for all variables to be able to better identify causality.


Healthcare in welfare societies like Sweden has increased in cost over the past 50 years, highlighting the need for developing strategies to simultaneously improve care quality while also minimizing costs. Through this innovative study that uses survival of dental fillings (which are a common and costly form of treatment) as an indication of care quality, we show that strong social capital is associated with reduced stress in dental clinics and can indirectly predict higher quality of care through increased job satisfaction among staff. This conclusion supports the idea that promoting a good work environment is an important strategy to consider when pursuing the combined goal of improved care quality and cost containment.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analysed for this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. A supplementary ethical approval would be needed for the request to be fulfilled.


  1. 1.

    Gralén K, Hjalte F, Persson U. Hälso- och sjukvårdsutgifternas utveckling i Sverige. Lund: Institutet för Hälso- och Sjukvårdsekonomi. IHE Report. 2019:5. Swedish. Accessed May 13, 2021.

  2. 2.

    Whittington JW, Nolan K, Lewis N, Torres T. Pursuing the triple aim: the first 7 years. Milbank Q. 2015;93(2):263–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    World Health Organization, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Delivering quality health services: a global imperative for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 May.

  4. 4.

    Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6):573–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kouvonen A, Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Oksanen T, Elovainio M, Cox T, et al. Psychometric evaluation of a short measure of social capital at work. BMC Pub Health. 2006;6(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Burr H, Berthelsen H, Moncada S, Nubling M, Dupret E, Demiral Y, et al. The third version of the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Saf Health Work. 2019;10(4):482–503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Berthelsen H, Westerlund H, Pejtersen JH, Hadzibajramovic E. Construct validity of a global scale for workplace social capital based on COPSOQ III. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0221893.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Clausen T, Meng A, Borg V. Does social Capital in the Workplace Predict job Performance, work engagement, and psychological well-being? A prospective analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 2019;61(10):800–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Oksanen T, Kouvonen A, Vahtera J, Virtanen M, Kivimäki M. Prospective study of workplace social capital and depression: are vertical and horizontal components equally important? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(8):684–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Løkke A-K. Social capital and health and job related outcomes: the case of a large municipality. Int J Workpl Health Manag. 2016;9(1):17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Strömgren M. Intention to leave among health care professionals: the importance of working conditions and social capital. J Hosp Adm. 2017;6(3):58.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Strömgren M, Eriksson A, Bergman D, Dellve L. Social capital among healthcare professionals: a prospective study of its importance for job satisfaction, work engagement and engagement in clinical improvements. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;53:116–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Framke E, Sørensen OH, Pedersen J, Clausen T, Borg V, Rugulies R. The association of vertical and horizontal workplace social capital with employees' job satisfaction, exhaustion and sleep disturbances: a prospective study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019;92(6):883–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kiss P, De Meester M, Kristensen TS, Braeckman L. Relationships of organizational social capital with the presence of "gossip and slander," "quarrels and conflicts," sick leave, and poor work ability in nursing homes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87(8):929–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kiss P, De Meester M, Kristensen TS, Clays E, Braeckman L. Association between work unit prevalence of poor work ability and social capital–a cross-sectional analysis of 63 public sector work units. Ukrainian J Occ Health. 2019;15(4).

  16. 16.

    Jensen JH, Flachs EM, Török E, Rod NH, Madsen IEH, Rugulies R, et al. Work-unit social capital and incident purchase of psychotropic medications: a longitudinal cohort-study of healthcare workers. J Affect Disord. 2020;1(276):53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jensen JH, Flachs EM, Skakon J, Rod NH, Bonde JP. Longitudinal associations between organizational change, work-unit social capital, and employee exit from the work unit among public healthcare workers: a mediation analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019;45(1):53–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Török E, Clark AJ, Jensen JH, Lange T, Bonde JP, Bjorner JB, et al. Work-unit social capital and long-term sickness absence: a prospective cohort study of 32 053 hospital employees. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75(9):623–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shin JI, Lee E. The effect of social capital on job satisfaction and quality of care among hospital nurses in South Korea. J Nurs Manag. 2016;24(7):934–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Angerer P, Weigl M. Physicians' psychosocial work conditions and quality of care: a literature review. Prof Prof. 2015;5(1).

  21. 21.

    Eurofound. Sixth European Working Conditions Survey – Overview report (2017 update). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Agrawal N, Gupta N, Bey A, Garg AK, Sharma V. Occupational hazards in modern dentistry: a review. Int J Med & Health Res. 2014;1(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Marklund S, Huang K, Zohouri D, Wahlström J. Dentists working conditions–factors associated with perceived workload. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020:1–6.

  24. 24.

    Hall LH, Johnson J, Watt I, Tsipa A, O'Connor DB. Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Plessas A, Delgado MB, Nasser M, Hanoch Y, Moles DR. Impact of stress on dentists' clinical performance. A systematic review. Community Dent Health. 2018, 1;35(1):9–15.

  26. 26.

    GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):775–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):87–101.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Moore R. Psychosocial aspects of dental anxiety and clinical pain phenomena [doctoral dissertation]. Aarhus: Aarhus University; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chipchase SY, Chapman HR, Bretherton R. A study to explore if dentists' anxiety affects their clinical decision-making. Br Dent J. 2017;222(4):277–90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chapman H, Chipchase S, Bretherton R. Understanding emotionally relevant situations in primary dental practice. 2. Reported effects of emotionally charged situations. Br Dent J. 2015;219(9):E8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Plessas A, Nasser M, Hanoch Y, O'Brien T, Bernardes Delgado M, Moles D. Impact of time pressure on dentists' diagnostic performance. J Dent. 2019;82:38–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Berthelsen H, Hjalmers K, Pejtersen JH, Soderfeldt B. Good work for dentists - a qualitative analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010;38(2):159–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gorter RC, Te Brake HJ, Hoogstraten J, Eijkman MA. Positive engagement and job resources in dental practice. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008;36(1):47–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Thorndike EL. The psychology of labor. Harper’s Monthly Magazine. 1922;144:799–806.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Taris TW, Schaufeli W. Individual well-being and performance at work: A conceptual and theoretical overview. In: van Veldhoven M, Peccei R, editors. Well-being and Performance at Work: The role of context (1st ed.). Psychology Press; 2014.

  37. 37.

    Wright TA, Cropanzano R. The happy/productive worker thesis revisited. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 26) Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 269–313.

  38. 38.

    Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):218–26.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hakanen JJ, Koivumäki J. Engaged or exhausted—how does it affect dentists’ clinical productivity? Burn res. Feb. 2014;1:12–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Garcia-Buades ME, Peiro JM, Montanez-Juan MI, Kozusznik MW, Ortiz-Bonnin S. Happy-Productive Teams and Work Units: A Systematic Review of the 'Happy-Productive Worker Thesis'. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019, 20;17(1):69.

  41. 41.

    Taris TW, Schreurs PJ. Well-being and organizational performance: an organizational-level test of the happy-productive worker hypothesis. Work Stress. 2009;23(2):120–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hakanen JJ, Perhoniemi R, Toppinen-Tanner S. Positive gain spirals at work: from job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. J Vocat Behav. 2008;73(1):78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Shin Y, Du J, Choi JN. Multi-level longitudinal dynamics between procedural justice and interpersonal helping in organizational teams. J Bus Psychol. 2015;30(3):513–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rodríguez-Sánchez AM, Hakanen JJ, Perhoniemi R, Salanova M. With a little help from my assistant: buffering the negative effects of emotional dissonance on dentist performance. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(5):415–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Berthelsen H, Conway PM, Clausen T. Is organizational justice climate at the workplace associated with individual-level quality of care and organizational affective commitment? A multi-level, cross-sectional study on dentistry in Sweden. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018;91(2):237–45.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Berthelsen H, Westerlund H, Bergström G, Burr H. Validation of the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire version III and establishment of benchmarks for psychosocial risk Management in Sweden. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020, May 2;17(9):3179.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Pejtersen J, Kristensen T, Borg V, Bjorner J. The second version of the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Scand J Public Health. 2010, Feb;38(3 Suppl):8–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Berthelsen H, Westerlund H, Kristensen TS. COPSOQ II - en uppdatering och språklig validering av den svenska versionen av en enkät för kartläggning av den psykosociala arbetsmiljön på arbetsplatser, vol. 326. Stockholm: Stressforskningsinstitutet; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Palotie U, Eronen AK, Vehkalahti K, Vehkalahti MM. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending public dental service-a 13-year observation. J Dent. 2017 Jul;62:13–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bliese PD. Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: a simulation. Org Res Methods. 1998;1(4):355–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bliese PD. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggre gation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000. p. 349–81.

  52. 52.

    Bliese PD, Maltarich MA, Hendricks JL, Hofmann DA, Adler AB. Improving the measurement of group-level constructs by optimizing between-group differentiation. J Appl Psychol. 2019;104(2):293–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    LeBreton JM, Senter JL. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Org Res Methods. 2008;11(4):815–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Lance CE, Butts MM, Michels LC. The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: what did they really say? Org Res Methods. 2006;9(2):202–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Hayes AF. An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2017.

  59. 59.

    Satorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika. 2001;66(4):507–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Satorra A, Bentler PM. Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika. 2010;75(2):243–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Dollard M, Dorman C, Idris M. Psychosocial safety climate: a new work stress theory. The Netherlands: Springer; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bejerot E. Dentistry in Sweden healthy work or ruthless efficiency? [thesis] Lund university; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Dahler-Larsen P, Sundby A, Boodhoo A. Can occupational health and safety management systems address psychosocial risk factors? An empirical study Saf Sci. 2020;130:104878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Smith LH, Hviid K, Frydendall KB, Flyvholm M-A. Improving the psychosocial work environment at multi-ethnic workplaces: a multi-component intervention strategy in the cleaning industry. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013, Oct 14;10(10):4996–5010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Pejtersen JH, Bjorner JB, Hasle P. Determining minimally important score differences in scales of the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Scand J Public Health. 2010, Feb;38(3 Suppl):33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Chief Dental Officer Håkan Bergevi, Region of Blekinge and Dr. Katharina Wretlind, Region of Västergötaland, Sweden for their insightful contextual contributions, which have been helpful for study design and interpretation of findings. The authors acknowledge the Swedish Quality Registry for Caries and Periodontal Diseases (SKaPa), which provided the data.


The study was financed by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (FORTE), Grant Number: 2016–00676. The funders had no involvement in the study design, data analysis, or the writing of the article. Open Access funding provided by Malmö University.

Author information




Conceptualization and funding acquisition: HB, HW; Project administration and data curation: HB; Formal analysis and visualization: MO; Original draft preparation: HB, MO; Review and editing: HW, MO, HB. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanne Berthelsen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Dental patients in Sweden give a general consent to the use of register data for research purposes that are in accordance with the intention behind the national quality register SKaPa. Handling of individual-level work environment data took place during a prior project and was based on informed consent from dental staff and approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Southern Sweden (dnr: 2013/256 & 2013/505). Only aggregated data on work climate at dental clinics was included in the present study. The entire study protocol was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Southern Sweden (dnr: 2017 323).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berthelsen, H., Owen, M. & Westerlund, H. Does workplace social capital predict care quality through job satisfaction and stress at the clinic? A prospective study. BMC Public Health 21, 1320 (2021).

Download citation


  • Psychosocial work environment
  • Performance
  • Dental fillings
  • Dentistry
  • Health care