Skip to main content

LGB prevalence in schools is associated with unhealthy weight-control behaviors in lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth: a multilevel analysis



Previous studies have found that a school climate of more heteronormativity is associated with adverse effects on the mental health of LGB students. Accordingly, our aim was to assess the association between lower LGB prevalence in schools and unhealthy weight-control behaviors among LGB youth.


A cross-sectional, multilevel study based in public high schools in the city of Olinda, Northeast Brazil. A multilevel logistic regression was performed, including 2500 adolescents enrolled in 27 schools. The contextual variable was the prevalence of LGB youth in each school (as a proxy for heteronormativity in schools), while the outcome was unhealthy weight-control behaviors (fasting, purging, and taking diet pills). We controlled for socioeconomic characteristics (age, sex, receiving a family allowance), obesity, and self-reported happiness.


Lower LGB prevalence in schools was associated with higher odds of engaging in unhealthy weight-control behaviors (OR: 1.5, 95%CI: 1.0, 2.2) among all youth, regardless of sexual orientation. No cross-level interactions between school context and individual characteristics were statistically significant.


Lower LGB prevalence in schools was associated with a higher risk of unhealthy weight-control behaviors in youth regardless of sexual orientation, which may reflect either the contextual influence of school climate, or may be due to residual confounding.

Peer Review reports


Schools need to provide a safe environment to guarantee the healthy development of their students. However, these conditions are not always met for sexual and gender minority youth as they are more likely to report negative perceptions and experiences of their school environment [1, 2]. Moreover, schools with more heteronormative norms have been shown to be associated with increased likelihood of depressed mood for all boys, regardless of their level of gender typicality [3]. Gower et al. [4] found that schools with more supportive LGBT climates had students reporting lower odds of victimization, regardless of their sexual orientation. Poteat et al. [5] showed that homophobic victimization had a direct effect on suicide behavior and school belonging, and an indirect effect on educational outcomes (reported grades, truancy, and graduation) for all students, regardless of sexuality. A Brazilian study which examined discrimination against homosexuality found that students who reported experiencing homophobic discrimination evaluated their school experience less positively [6]. In sum, heteronormativity in school is harmful to all students, not just to sexual and gender minorities. According to Johns et al. [7], there is a need for more school-based research focusing on the health of sexual and gender minority youth utilizing a multi-level framework to consider the influence of school contexts and climate. In the present study, we examined whether lower LGB prevalence (as a measure of school context) is associated with unhealthy weight-control behaviors among youth, irrespective of their sexual orientation.

Outwardly, Brazil projects an image of a liberal-progressive country with regard to issues of sexuality, probably because of its famous Carnival and the visibility of gay activists [8]. Contrary to that popular image, however, Brazil is one of the countries with the highest toll of deaths attributed to homophobic violence [9], and the numbers in the Northeast of Brazil are among the worst [10]. Despite advances in LGBT rights during the last few years [11], it is important to consider that virtually all the progress in Brazilian LGBT legislation was based on judicial fiat instead of legislation proposed at the federal level [8]. In addition, in the wake of the last presidential election, the Brazilian population is becoming more intolerant. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights has declared that the life of a gay member of the Brazilian Congress was “at grave risk” and that the state was not doing enough to protect them. Fear has driven some politicians to voluntarily drive themselves into exile [12]. The Brazilian president and his staff have repeatedly made overt homophobic statements in public [13, 14]. This homophobic tendency is already reflected in policies such as the removal of sex education from the Brazilian Education Plan [15] and a bill proposed by a senator for criminalizing homosexuality in schools [16].

Minority stress and health behaviors

Brazilian adolescents report widespread negative and even violent reactions from their families when they “came out” to reveal their sexual orientation [17]. Minority stress refers to the psychological trauma associated with widespread societal prejudice, i.e. against sexual minorities [18]. Some Brazilian studies have evaluated minority stress. One study showed that minority stress predicted depressive symptomatology among sexual minority men [19], while another study demonstrated that the odds ratio for suicide attempts more than doubled among young Brazilians experiencing sexual stigma [20].

One mental health consequence of minority stress manifests in the form of eating disorders. Previous studies have demonstrated a higher prevalence of these disorders among sexual and gender minorities [21, 22]. According to Mensinger et al. [23], greater experiences of bullying/abuse are more prevalent in sexual and gender minorities and probably explain more severe eating disorders symptoms in this group compared to cisgender heterosexuals.

To our knowledge, the school climate regarding hostility was not studied relating to sexual minorities and weight control behaviors. We hypothesized that strongly heteronormative school contexts (i.e. lower prevalence/visibility of sexual minority youth) are associated with more unhealthy weight control behaviors for all students, regardless of their sexual orientation. For heterosexual youth, we hypothesize that masculine and feminine body ideals transmitted by society (i.e. through advertising and social media) are more likely to prevail in strongly heteronormative school contexts, and that pressure to conform to these ideals will result in higher prevalence of unhealthy weight control behaviors.

For sexual minority youth, we hypothesize that more strongly heteronormative school contexts lead to more discrimination against sexual minorities, resulting in higher minority stress, and unhealthy coping responses (in the form of unhealthy weight control behaviors). Hence, our hypothesis is that strongly heteronormative schools will result in unhealthy weight control behaviors for both heterosexual youth and sexual minority youth.

In the present study we sought to examine the association between heteronormativity (as proxied by the prevalence of LGB youth in schools) and unhealthy weight-control behaviors among sexual minority youth.


This is a cross-sectional study performed in Olinda in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Olinda had a population of 390,000 residents and 33 state public high schools in 2018.

The data were collected from February to June 2018 in 87% (n = 27) of all state public high schools with daytime classes (31 schools), which agreed to take part in the study. The two schools offering only night classes were not invited. The response rate of all invited students enrolled in the 27 schools was 37.2% (2700). Almost all the classrooms (91%) in the involved schools participated in our data collection.

The Informed Consent Form (ICF) was signed by the parents/guardians of all participants under 18-years-old, while children also provided written assent. Participants over 18-years of age consented by themselves. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Pernambuco (No. 2.361.780).

Four trained and calibrated examiners measured body weight and height with strong inter-rater reliability for height (kappa 0.99). A portable stadiometer (Sanny®) and a self-zeroing digital scale (CAMRY) with a maximum capacity of 150 kg were used to measure height and body weight, respectively. The participants were weighed barefoot wearing socks and light clothing.

The sociodemographic and health behavior modules were adapted from the U.S. Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) questionnaire [24]. The student’s sociodemographic situation was assessed by their age, sex, and whether they received a family allowance. The family allowance is given in Brazil to poor families and extremely poor families with per-capita monthly incomes below $170 BRL (~$45 USD) or $85 BRL (~$23 USD), respectively.

The survey also asked whether the students had experienced victimization, whether they were actively trying to lose weight, as well as self-perception of happiness (In general, how do you feel in your actual life?) on a 5-point Likert scale (1 “totally unhappy” 2 “not happy” 3 “happy” 4 “very happy” 5 “totally happy”).

Victimization was based on at least one positive answer for these three questions: (1. During the past 12 months, have you ever been bullied on school property? - answer choices: 1 “yes” 2 “no”; 2. During the past 12 months, have you ever been electronically bullied? (Count being bullied through texting, Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp or other social media.) - answer choices: 1 “yes” 2 “no”; 3. During the past 12 months, how many times has someone threatened or injured you with a weapon such as a gun, knife, or club on school property?) - answer choices: 1 “0 times” 2 “1 time” 3 “2 or 3 times” 4 “4 or 5 times” 5 “6 or 7 times” 6 “8 or 9 times” 7 “10 or 11 times” 8 “12 or more times”. Trying to lose weight was based in the question “Which of the following are you trying to do about your weight?”, with responses categorized as: trying to gain weight, stay the same weight or I am not trying to do anything about my weight, and trying to lose weight. Weight categories were based on cut-off z scores recommended by the WHO: underweight (< − 2), normal weight (≥ − 2 and < + 1), overweight (≥ + 1 and < + 2), obese (≥ + 2) [25].

The LGB variable was derived from adolescents who reported having sexual intercourse with a partner of the same sex or with partners of both sexes in line with Kim et al. [26], and Parkes et al. [27]

Our contextual variable of interest was LGB prevalence in each school as a proxy of LGB visibility in line with VanKim et al. [28]. The variable was dichotomized into lower LGB prevalence (≤ 3.01%) vs middle-lower, middle-higher, and higher LGB prevalence (> 3.01%), where the cut-off was made at the 25th percentile.

The outcome variable was unhealthy weight-control behaviors created by combining the following three behaviors: fasting, purging, and using diet pills.

Data analysis was carried out using STATA/IC version 15.1 software program. We performed a sequence of multilevel logistic regressions (with random intercept) for the outcome of unhealthy weight-control behaviors (fasting, purging, or using diet pills). The empty model included only the dependent variable (Model 1). The second model included only the contextual variable (Model 2), and the third model included only individual variables. In the final model, we combined the individual and contextual variables (Model 4). The cross-level interaction between the contextual variable (LGB prevalence) and the individual variables (LGB and sex) were also tested. Some individual variables such as obesity, trying to lose weight, victimization, and self-perception of unhappiness were controlled for attenuates the association between LGB & unhealthy weight-control behaviors.

We used the proportional change in variance (PCV) to assess changes in the random intercept term. In other words, the PCV represents the proportional change in the area level variance compared to the empty model (Model 1) [29]. We also used the Median Odds Ratio (MOR) to quantify the variation between clusters in each sequence of models [30]. When the MOR equals 1.0, it means that there is no heterogeneity between the analyzed contexts. We also tested the fitted multilevel logistic regression model using the Deviance (2 Res log-likelihood).


A total of 2500 students filled out the questionnaires out of the 2700 adolescents (and parents) who consented to participate in this study (92.6% rate response). The reasons for missing data in the survey were adolescents who did not allow anthropometric measurements (n = 53) or did not answer most of the questionnaire (the number is specific for each variable). More participants were female (55.9%), older young (74.7%), and not receiving a family allowance (54.5%) (Table 1).

Table 1 Sample characteristics

We found associations at the individual level in the expected directions, such as higher reports of unhealthy weight control behaviors among LGB youth (OR: 1.9, 95%CI, 1.1–3.2), as well as adolescents reporting victimization (OR: 1.6, 95%CI, 1.1–2.4). Over and above these individual associations, the contextual environment of lower LGB prevalence was also significantly associated with unhealthy weight-control behaviors (OR: 1.5, 95%CI, 1.0–2.2) (Table 2). However, when we tested cross-level interactions between school context and individual characteristics, they were not statistically significant (Model 5c, Table 2): LGB prevalence x LGB status (OR: 3.8, 95% CI, 0.6–23.7), LGB prevalence x sex (OR: 1.0, 95% CI, 0.4–2.2), or LGB prevalence x LGB adolescent x sex (OR: 0.0, 95% CI, 0.0–1.0). In other words, lower LGB prevalence in schools was associated with higher odds of unhealthy weight control behaviors among both LBG and heterosexual youth.

Table 2 Multilevel adjustment for LGB prevalence in school and unhealthy weight-control (fasting, using diet pills or purging)


Our findings did not support our initial hypothesis that we would find higher unhealthy weight-control behaviors among LGB youth attending public schools with lower LGB prevalence. Instead, we found that schools at middle-lower, middle-higher, and higher quartile of LGB prevalence protect all students, regardless of their sexual orientation.

At the individual level, LGB youth were significantly more likely to report unhealthy weight-control behaviors, which is in line with Lucassen et al. [31] Regarding the interaction between LGB x sex at the individual level, LGB boys were not significantly more likely to engage in unhealthy weight-control, although the direction of association was in the expected direction, in line with Hadland et al. [32]

However, the bigger picture from our study is that the lower LGB prevalence is correlated with unhealthy weight-control behaviors in all students. One reason for this is because heteronormal schools are more likely to transmit “toxic” gender norms for both heterosexual youth and LGB youth, which is consistent with previous studies [3, 4]. For heterosexual youth, these schools lead to unhealthy weight control behavior because boys & girls are pressured to conform to distorted ideal body types popularized by marketing & media (i.e. girls are expected to be thin & boys are expected to be trim) [33]. For LGB youth, the same schools are unhealthy because of bullying and minority stress. In other words, these schools are “lose-lose” for everyone.

Our findings suggest that addressing LGB prejudice in the Brazilians school context could promote positive health outcomes among adolescent students [34]. Other studies indicate that one of the first steps for creating a safe and supportive school climate is to reinstate sexual education in the curriculum [35]. Other examples of actions that improve school climate include presentation of LGB films [36], the presence of Gay-Straight Student Alliances in the school [37], and training for school staff to support sexual and gender minority students [4]. According to Gower et al. [4], schools that implemented more of the practices experienced lower victimization rates among their students, regardless of the sexual orientation of the students.

A limitation of our study is that the survey did not explicitly inquire about bullying specifically based on sexual orientation. Nor did we assess aspects of minority stress related to sexual orientation such as negative internalized stigma, discrimination related to sexual orientation, and acceptance by the family. Our survey also did not specifically inquire about sexual identity or attraction. The true LGB population was probably underestimated in our sample, since it was only defined by adolescents who reported having sexual intercourse with a same-sex partner, and did not count adolescents who were sexually inactive. In addition, our results may not be externally generalizable to other regions and areas in Brazil. Finally, we did not directly assess LGB-supportive climate in the schools; instead we used a proxy for LGB visibility evaluated by the prevalence of LGB students in schools.


Our findings show that lower LGB prevalence in schools is associated with unhealthy weight-control behaviors regardless of sexual orientation. Further studies are needed to corroborate our findings, and improve on the limitations of our study, particularly the operationalization of school climate vis-a-vis sexual and gender minority students. In addition, the association may be due to residual confounding by other unobserved school characteristics, so that a more comprehensive assessment of school climate is warranted.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual youth


  1. 1.

    Rose ID, Sheremenko G, Rasberry CN, Lesesne CA, Adkins SNH. Sex differences in school safety and bullying experiences among sexual minority youth. J Sch Nurs. 2018;34(4):301–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mooij T. School indicators of violence experienced and feeling unsafe of Dutch LGB versus non-LGB secondary students and staff, 2006-2010. J Interpers Violence. 2016;31(20):3413–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Smith DS, Schacter HL, Enders C, Juvonen J. Gender norm salience across middle schools: contextual variations in associations between gender typicality and socioemotional distress. J Youth Adolesc. 2018;47(5):947–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gower AL, Forster M, Gloppen K, Johnson AZ, Eisenberg ME, Connett JE, et al. School practices to Foster LGBT-supportive climate: associations with adolescent bullying involvement. Prev Sci. 2018;19(6):813–21.

  5. 5.

    Poteat VP, Mereish EH, DiGiovanni CD, Koenig BW. The effects of general and homophobic victimization on adolescents' psychosocial and educational concerns: the importance of intersecting identities and parent support. J Couns Psychol. 2011;58(4):597–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Asinelli-Luz A, Cunha JMd. Perceptions about the homophobic discrimination among high school graduates in Brazil from 2004 to 2008. Educar em Revista. 2011(39):87–102.

  7. 7.

    Johns MM, Poteat VP, Horn SS, Kosciw J. Strengthening our schools to promote resilience and health among LGBTQ youth: emerging evidence and research priorities from the state of LGBTQ youth health and wellbeing symposium. LGBT Health. 2019;6(4):146–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Encarnación OG. A Latin American puzzle: gay rights landscapes in Argentina and Brazil. Hum Rights Q. 2018;40(1):194–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    GGB, Bahia GGd. Relatório parcial por ocasião do Dia Internacional Contra a Homofobia. Mortes de LGBT+ do Brasil (janeiro a 15 maio de 2019) Quem a homofobia matou hoje 2019. Available from:

  10. 10.

    Benevides BG, Nogueira Dossiê SNB. Assassinatos e violência contra travestis e transexuais no Brasil em 2018. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Irineu BA. 10 years of Brasil without homophobia program: critical notes. Temporais. 2014;28:193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Vivanco JM. A voice for LGBT rights silenced in Brazil: congressman Wyllys quits over fears for his life. 2019. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Faiola A, Lopes M. The Americas: LGBT rights threatened in Brazil under new far-right president. 2019. Available from:

  14. 14.

    AFP. Brazilian president says decision to criminalise homophobia 'completely wrong'. 2019. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Barbosa LU, Viçosa CtSCL Folmer V. Sex education in the education policy documents and their significance. Rev Eletrôn Acervo Saúde. 2019;11(10):e772.

  16. 16.

    Brasil. Senado Federal. Tornar crime o ensino de ideologia de gênero nas escolas brasileiras. 2019. Available from:

  17. 17.

    Braga IF, Oliveira WA, Silva JL, Mello FCM, Silva MAI. Family violence against gay and lesbian adolescents and young people: a qualitative study. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(suppl 3):1220–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(5):674–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dunn TL, Gonzalez CA, Costa AB, Nardi HC, Iantaffi A. Does the minority stress model generalize to a non-U.S. sample? An examination of minority stress and resilience on depressive symptomatology among sexual minority men in two urban areas of Brazil. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2014;1(2):117–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Brandelli Costa A, et al. The experience of sexual stigma and the increased risk of attempted suicide in young Brazilian people from low socioeconomic group. Front Psychol. 2017;8:192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Calzo JP, Blashill AJ, Brown TA, Argenal RL. Eating disorders and disordered weight and shape control behaviors in sexual minority populations. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(8):49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Watson RJ, Adjei J, Saewyc E, Homma Y, Goodenow C. Trends and disparities in disordered eating among heterosexual and sexual minority adolescents. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(1):22–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mensinger JL, Granche JL, Cox SA, Henretty JR. Sexual and gender minority individuals report higher rates of abuse and more severe eating disorder symptoms than cisgender heterosexual individuals at admission to eating disorder treatment. Int J Eat Disord. 2020;53(4):541–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Guedes DP, Lopes CC. Validation of the Brazilian version of the 2007 youth risk behavior survey. Rev Saude Publica. 2010;44(5):840–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(9):660–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kim GH, Ahn HS, Kim HJ. Type of sexual intercourse experience and suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts among youths: a cross-sectional study in South Korea. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Parkes A, Strange V, Wight D, Bonell C, Copas A, Henderson M, et al. Comparison of Teenagers' Early Same-Sex and Heterosexual Behavior: UK Data From the SHARE and RIPPLE Studies. J Adolesc Health. 2011;48(1).

  28. 28.

    VanKim NA, Eisenberg ME, Erickson DJ, Lust K, Laska MN. College climate and sexual orientation differences in weight status. Prev Sci. 2020;21(3):422–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Merlo J, Yang M, Chaix B, Lynch J, Råstam L. A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: investigating contextual phenomena in different groups of people. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(9):729–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Larsen K, Merlo J. Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(1):81–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lucassen MF, Guntupalli AM, Clark T, Fenaughty J, Denny S, Fleming T, et al. Body size and weight, and the nutrition and activity behaviours of sexual and gender minority youth: findings and implications from New Zealand. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(13):2346–56.

  32. 32.

    Hadland SE, Austin SB, Goodenow CS, Calzo JP. Weight misperception and unhealthy weight control behaviors among sexual minorities in the general adolescent population. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54(3):296–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Hannan PJ, Perry CL, Irving LM. Weight-related concerns and behaviors among overweight and nonoverweight adolescents: implications for preventing weight-related disorders. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(2):171–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    González-Jiménez AJ, Fischer V. Gender and sexual orientation among adolescents in Brazil: an analysis of the prejudice and bullying in the educational context. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2017;237:38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Proulx CN, Coulter RWS, Egan JE, Matthews DD, Mair C. Associations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning-inclusive sex education with mental health outcomes and school-based victimization in U.S. high school students. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(5):608–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Burk J, Park M, Saewyc EM. A media-based school intervention to reduce sexual orientation prejudice and its relationship to discrimination, bullying, and the mental health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents in Western Canada: a population-based evaluation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11):2447.

  37. 37.

    Saewyc EM, et al. School-based strategies to reduce suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and discrimination among sexual minority and heterosexual adolescents in Western Canada. Int J Child Youth Family Stud. 2014;5(1):89–112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors wish to thank all the high school students who participated in this study and the Society for Epidemiologic Research for the opportunity to present this work at the 2020 Annual Meeting.


The authors declare that they received no financial support for this research.

Author information




CFBFS, FG, VAM, VC were responsible for the conception and design, and acquisition of data. CBFBFS and IK were responsible for data analysis interpretation and drafting of the manuscript. RCF, PMPAZ, IK were responsible for revising it critically for valuable intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina da Franca Bandeira Ferreira Santos.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All study procedures were approved before start by the Ethics Committee of University of Pernambuco (N. 2.361.780). All participants under 18-year-old provided written assent, while written consent was obtained from their parents/guardians. Youth over 18 years old consented by themselves through a signing of the Inform Consent Form.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos, C.d.F.B.F., Godoy, F., de Menezes, V.A. et al. LGB prevalence in schools is associated with unhealthy weight-control behaviors in lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health 21, 1256 (2021).

Download citation


  • Sexual and gender minorities
  • Schools
  • Feeding and eating disorders
  • Adolescent
  • Multilevel analysis