Skip to main content

Sociocultural barriers to hepatitis B health literacy in an immigrant population: a focus group study in Korean Americans

Abstract

Background

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major global health issue disproportionately affecting Asian Americans and other immigrant populations in the United States. Despite the high risk of morbid complications from CHB, the majority of individuals with CHB do not access healthcare due to a complex of barriers. These barriers influence health literacy which may affect behaviors linked to hepatitis B care. We aimed to identify and evaluate various sociocultural factors and how they interact with health literacy to impact CHB care and health seeking in a Korean American population.

Methods

A total of 28 Korean American individuals with CHB were divided into 5 different focus discussion groups. This study investigated the participants’ sociocultural backgrounds as well as their awareness and utilization of the healthcare system that could influence their health literacy and behaviors in accessing care.

Results

Our analysis identified and concentrated on three themes that emerged from these discussions: low risk perception and knowledge of CHB and its complications; language, immigrant status, and stigma; and financial and institutional barriers. The participants’ overall awareness of the disease and prevention methods demonstrated poor understanding of important characteristics and potential outcomes of the disease. Additionally, differences in cultural expectations and a lack of understanding and utilization of healthcare systems affected health literacy in further limiting participants’ motivation to seek care.

Conclusions

The present study suggests that there are culture-specific barriers to health literacy governing individuals’ health behavior in accessing hepatitis B care. These findings may inform strategies for developing culturally tailored resources and programs and for facilitating the implementation of community-wide hepatitis B education and screening initiatives in immigrant communities.

Peer Review reports

Background

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is one of the most common infectious diseases of the liver currently affecting over 250 million people worldwide [1] and causing approximately 887,000 deaths annually from CHB complications such as liver cancer and cirrhosis [2]. CHB is also a disease of ethnic disparity as there is a marked difference in CHB prevalence and levels of access to care among various regions of the world [3,4,5]. For instance, the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is highest in sub-Saharan Africa and East Asia, where up to 8% of the population is chronically infected [6]. By contrast, at 0.3%, HBV prevalence is lowest in Western Europe and North America [7].

HBV prevalence also varies considerably among different ethnicities within the United States (U.S.), disproportionately affecting immigrants from HBV-endemic countries. Given that approximately 50,000 people legally enter the U.S. every year from intermediate to highly endemic (i.e. HBV prevalence > 2%) countries and a majority of these individuals are not screened, CHB remains a serious public health issue in the U.S. [8, 9].

Asian Americans are highly susceptible to poor health outcomes from chronic HBV infection for the following reasons. First, of 2.2 million people chronically infected with HBV in the U.S., approximately half are Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders [10]. Surprisingly, 67% of people living with the virus do not know that they have it [11], largely due to absence of symptoms, as well as the lack of universal screening. Second, CHB is undertreated, indicated by a significant discrepancy between the number of patients receiving treatment and the number of treatment-eligible patients [12, 13]. Third, a majority of Asian Americans with CHB are infected through mother-to-child transmission, resulting in a lifetime exposure to the virus [14]. As the age at HBV infection is correlated with the prognosis of the disease, those infected perinatally have consistently shown a high probability of remaining chronically infected [15]. Fourth, Asian Americans are the most likely of any ethnic group to develop liver cancer. The reasons for this liver cancer predisposition are multifactorial. In addition to a significantly higher prevalence in CHB among Asian Americans as compared to other ethnicities, Asian Americans are exposed to the virus for a longer duration of their life course as the majority of Asian Americans are infected at a young age [16]. There are also differences in genotypes and prevalence of HBV mutations among ethnic groups that may contribute to varying degrees of carcinogenicity [17]. Despite all these risks, screening and preventative behavior in Asian Americans have been found to be infrequent and poor, respectively, resulting in low levels of healthcare utilization for consistent monitoring and treatment of CHB in the Asian American population [18].

The above observations likely relate to specific cultural and social determinants of health [19,20,21]. Social determinants of health are conditions in the sociopolitical environments in which people are born and live, work, and play that affect a wide range of health and quality of life outcomes. Conditions in these various settings such as availability of resources, availability of healthy foods, public safety, quality of education, and social support networks can have significant influence on health outcomes. Health is also a cultural concept, as culture shapes how individuals perceive their experiences. Cultural determinants of health encompass people’s culturally based beliefs, practices and values that impact their health outcomes. Social and cultural factors inevitably interact with biological factors to impact health, through determining a person’s experience and their definition of health [22, 23].

These sociocultural factors can also impact health literacy- a crucial element in determination of health seeking behaviors and health outcomes. Health literacy is a multidimensional skillset that significantly facilitates health management, navigation of healthcare systems and resources, and health knowledge. For the purposes of this study in probing into individual accounts, we have chosen to define health literacy as the degree to which an individual has the capacity to obtain, communicate, process and understand basic health information and services to make appropriate health decisions [24].

Health literacy improves peoples’ control over their health by identifying factors important to health outcomes. Low levels of health literacy, as demonstrated by studies in numerous diseases, affect roughly one-third of the U.S. adult population [25]. Studies found that a low level of health literacy is associated with decreased likelihood of preventative health measures [26], higher frequency of hospital admissions with increased morbidity and mortality [27], and greater risk of long-term, life-limiting health conditions, and more difficulty managing medications [28].

Poor health literacy also disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minorities, contributing to health disparities in these populations [29]. Since CHB is a disease prevalent among ethnic minorities and immigrants, many of whom do not consider English their first language and are unfamiliar with the culture and social systems of the U.S., a lack of health literacy may further worsen CHB health outcomes. Thus, a health literacy framework may be useful in identifying and evaluating the role of sociocultural barriers to care, particularly for a disease of ethnic disparity like CHB. A number of studies have shown health knowledge gaps as a critical barrier that hinders access to care in CHB [30,31,32]. Some other studies have also evaluated the effects of misconceptions and lower education level on healthcare access among CHB patients [33, 34]. In addition, there are limited studies accounting for health literacy and its influence on infectious disease, which have suggested an association between health literacy and protective behaviors such as immunization and antibiotic use for the treatment of infections [35].

While previous works have examined health knowledge, they have not investigated health literacy as a driving force of health behaviors in responding to CHB. The dearth of published studies on these topics highlights the need to further investigate how CHB can be better understood through sociocultural contexts within an immigrant population.

The aim of the present study was to identify and evaluate various sociocultural factors and how these interact with health literacy to impact CHB care and health seeking within a Korean American immigrant population. We carried out focus group discussions with 28 Korean American adults living with CHB. Since CHB burden in the Korean American population is heavy with a significant disparity in health access, we investigated sociocultural barriers to hepatitis B literacy and their influence on access to care.

Methods

Participants

Participants were Korean American adults who were found to be hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositive (i.e., HBV-infected) from community-based hepatitis B awareness campaigns conducted in Flushing, New York, between January 2016 and June 2017. The term “Korean Americans” refers to those who were either born in Korea or in the United States with parents from Korea. These community-based campaigns consisted of CHB education and screening programs led by Korean Community Services (KCS). KCS is a non-profit organization with a broad range of programs that address various needs of the community. These include programs devoted to promoting CHB screening and linkage to care in the Korean American community. We collaborated with KCS to further investigate barriers to health literacy and CHB care as they had access to a group of Korean Americans with CHB who were already participants in their events.

A total of 52 people with CHB were identified and invited to participate in this study. They were given a written description of the study, which included the study’s purpose and procedure. Twenty-eight of 52 signed up for the study. The inclusion criteria required that participants be Korean American adults and hepatitis B surface antigen positive. The exclusion criteria were if the participants had any condition that would limit their ability to participate in the study or if they refused to give informed consent. Before the study, participants signed an informed consent form available in both Korean and English. No incentives were provided for the participants to join the study.

Study design

Twenty-eight participants were randomly divided into 5 groups, each consisting of 5 or 6 individuals. The focus groups provided opportunities for the moderators to probe into specific topics and related matters on which the participants showed interest in elaborating on. Prior to each session, moderators briefly described the contents of discussion materials to participants. Each of the focus group discussions took 2 to 2 ½ hours. Focus group sessions took place at a conference room within the KCS headquarters located in Flushing, New York. Eight participants were fluent in both Korean and English, and all participants preferred to communicate in Korean.

Focus groups were identified as the best approach to investigate the topic of interest for a number of reasons. As focus groups are ideal for gaining multiple perspectives on a shared experience, they helped gauge a wide variety of experiences with CHB, as all participants were living with CHB. Focus groups also helped elucidate commonalities and differences between participants’ experiences. The focus group questions were less oriented toward individual-specific information but more toward the range of experiences, opinions, and concerns of the group. In this group environment, the moderator and participants shifted from being passive observers to active listeners, gaining the chance to reflect on and assess the issues being raised. The focus groups facilitated a multi-faceted exploration of CHB-related inquiries. Specifically, the participants were asked about barriers to CHB care, their experiences with healthcare providers, and their understanding of transmission risks and potential outcomes of CHB.

In this study, focus groups revealed a fluid dynamic in which participants exchanged and tested out ideas with each other, spurring conversation on new topics. There was very little potential for sensitive health information to be revealed based on the fact that none of the questions on the question guide prompted participants to reveal sensitive personal information. It was also emphasized that the participants did not have to share anything that would make them feel uncomfortable.

Participants were ensured anonymity going into the study, and all collected data were anonymized prior to analysis. There was a possibility that the participants could have known each other in the community prior to the focus group, but this was not the case for this study.

Data collection and analysis

All participants filled out a survey assessing demographic and epidemiologic characteristics [see Additional file 1]. The items in the survey included gender, date of birth, country of birth, contact information and preferred language. The questionnaire and screening procedures were reviewed and approved by an Institutional Review Board. All data were anonymized before review and analysis. All sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed by investigators.

A pilot codebook was generated based on themes that the researchers identified in and derived from the transcriptions. The investigators then independently applied the codebook to the transcripts in order to modify and reconcile the final version with appropriate codes and sub-codes. It was inductive content analysis as the investigators worked from individual and group accounts in the focus group to develop themes. Inconsistencies between coders were examined and debated within the team of investigators and resolved unanimously. Discrepancies were discussed thoroughly as each investigator explained their rationale for coding and the group voted to decide which code to use. The group was able to come to a clear resolution for all discrepancies.

Results

Demographic and epidemiologic characteristics of participants

The sample of 28 individuals in the present cohort included 16 men and 12 women whose ages ranged from 20 to 69, with a mean age of 54 (Table 1). All subjects were Korean Americans currently living in the state of New York. Twenty-two (79%) of 28 were born in Korea and 6 in the U.S. A majority of the participants, 24 (86%) of 28, had been living in the U.S. for over 10 years.

Table 1 Demographics of HBsAg-seropositive participants

We evaluated how long the participants had been aware of their infection status. As shown in Table 2, an overwhelming majority had known that they were infected 10 to 20 years prior to this study. Approximately 70% of the participants had a history of CHB in their immediate family. Sixty-one percent were college graduates, and the rest were high school graduates. A little over half of the participants (57%) had health insurance.

Table 2 CHB History and Characteristics of HBsAg-seropositive participants

Despite their long histories of infection, only 8 of 28 (29%) were currently seeing physicians for CHB care, and the remaining 20 (71%) were not seeing physicians or linked to any health care services (Table 2). All participants admitted that they had been recommended at least once to see a physician for a full evaluation and follow up when they were initially diagnosed. Of those 8 participants currently seeing physicians, all but one was diagnosed before 2010. Upon further evaluation, 6 of the 20 participants who were not currently linked to care had seen a physician at least once between their initial diagnosis and the time of the current investigation but failed to follow up due to various reasons. The most common reason was that they felt no symptoms and thus felt no need to seek care.

Themes identified through content analysis

Low risk perception and knowledge of CHB is the first of three prominent themes we identified in the focus group data. The specific responses generated from these discussions underwent integrated analysis, and their main findings are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 Lack of knowledge and risk perception for CHB and its complications

Low risk perception and knowledge of CHB

Participants had poor knowledge of CHB and showed a significant lack of understanding regarding the fact that the absence of symptoms can often be associated with a serious progression of the disease. For example, many participants falsely believed that if they showed no symptoms, it meant that their CHB was not active (Table 3 Part A). Most participants were also unaware that asymptomatic disease can revert to active disease (Table 3 Part B). Furthermore, the participants’ level of knowledge on antiviral treatments was low. Participants were either unaware of the existence of effective treatments or had little knowledge of the efficacy of existing treatments. When asked whether they knew if there was any medical treatment for HBV, an overwhelming majority of participants responded that there was no effective treatment (Table 3 Part B). While about half of the participants knew that antiviral medications for CHB existed, they did not consider them as treatment.

Focus group discussions also touched on the perceived risk for liver cancer, with only half of all participants recognizing the heightened risk for liver cancer among Asian Americans. While some participants were aware that CHB could lead to liver cancer, they were unaware that symptoms are uncommon in the early stages of liver cancer, and that liver cancer can be diagnosed in patients without symptoms (Table 3 Part C).

We additionally found that a majority of the participants were unaware of the need for preventive check-ups. They felt doctors’ office visits were only needed when they experienced physical symptoms of discomfort or pain. As one participant added, “I was doing fine so I chose not to go back to the clinic”; they felt the need to seek care only for urgent matters or illnesses but not otherwise (Table 4). Some patients were quicker to turn to Eastern medicine acupuncturists for herbal medicinal drinks to “cleanse their body.”

Table 4 Language, Immigrant status, and Stigma. Impact of language and sociocultural factors on health decision making and health behaviors

Language, immigrant status, and stigma

The role of language barriers was evident through discussion. Regardless of the participants’ levels of education or length of residence in the U.S., language remained a barrier when it came to healthcare. While many participants could carry out normal, daily communication in English with relative ease, they recounted the difficulties in describing their medical symptoms and concerns. One participant, for instance, said, “You cannot literally translate word for word and expect the meaning to be the same.” Many ideas expressed commonly in Korean do not have English equivalents, potentially representing a language gap that can lead to miscommunication (Table 4).

The participants were asked whether they felt either disadvantaged or discriminated against when accessing healthcare as immigrants. Most participants responded similarly, saying that they felt some degree of separation or alienation from healthcare professionals especially during their experiences in hospital settings. Some participants recalled a sense of burden that came along with having to interact with people who did not speak Korean, and the resulting fear of misunderstanding and lack of trust that affected their decisions to forego seeking healthcare again (Table 4).

In addition, the stress associated with immigrant life further complicated the processes required for adequate access to care (Table 4). This stress stemmed from personal internalization of minority ethnic group membership and manifested as uncertainty and skepticism towards the healthcare system, as noted by a participant who wondered if they were receiving differential treatment based on their membership in a minority group.

Stigma-associated events were evident and serious according to some participants. Most participants were familiar with the stigma attached to CHB. Several participants elaborated that as a result of their diagnosis, they became afraid to socialize openly, go out on dates, or even interact with their family. One participant often felt guilty eating with his children at the same table. Although this participant demonstrated a lack of knowledge on the routes of HBV transmission (i.e., the fact that HBV is not transmitted through sharing food), his behavior around his own children demonstrates the reality of stigma. Another participant who was younger, in his thirties, explained his agony over telling his girlfriend about his CHB status, as he thought it would cause strain and anxiety in his relationship.

Financial and institutional barriers

Financial issues were cited as common reasons for delayed visits to doctor’s offices. Participants cited a lack of insurance as the main reason they were not currently seeing a doctor. They also described difficulties in enrolling and accessing insurance and particularly, issues with the cost of enrollment (Table 5). One participant said, “The insurance cost keeps rising, and the high copay and deductible payments even with insurance is way too much to afford. So I do not have any health insurance.”

Table 5 Financial and related healthcare system barriers

One participant who had previously worked as a nurse in China, a country where hepatitis B and liver disease are highly prevalent, felt that doctors in the U.S. were less knowledgeable about CHB and as a result did not empathize well with patients, often appearing almost negligent of patients and their needs. Similarly, one participant stated that she did not feel comfortable or cared for when she visited her doctor’s office. Another issue raised was the lack of information that doctors and health professionals would relay to CHB patients (Table 5). Due to this perceived lack of medical expertise in the community, participants felt discouraged from pursuing follow-up care.

In addition, a number of participants remarked on how “complicated” hospitals seemed to be in the U.S., involving lengthy processes such as verifying identification in multiple forms and going back and forth between different wings of the hospital, causing “unnecessary” delays and eventually discouraging future visits. They noted, for instance, that at a majority of hospitals and doctor’s offices in South Korea, appointments are not necessary; access to care is first come, first served. In contrast, appointments at doctor’s offices or hospitals are often not available for several weeks or even months in the U.S.

Discussion

Our findings reveal a significant lack of access to CHB care in a group of 28 Korean American participants with CHB. The results have identified an important set of barriers to health literacy, which are largely informed by the sociocultural overlay of the participants’ experiences. Low risk perception and knowledge, cultural differences and stigma, and financial and institutional barriers, which were identified as prominent issues in focus group discussions, all affected health literacy and influenced the participants’ capacity to access care.

Health literacy

The causes of low health literacy levels pertaining to CHB among high risk populations in the U.S. are multifactorial and include linguistic and culture-specific factors, both of which influence participants’ access to and experience with healthcare. For instance, our results showed that although a majority (86%) of the participants had been living in the U.S. for over 10 years (Table 1), there was a consensus that linguistic and cultural differences significantly hindered their healthcare-seeking abilities (Table 4). To complicate matters more, language used among healthcare professionals often containing medical jargon further compromised participants’ health literacy, resulting in poorer healthcare experiences. The participants’ ethnic and cultural identity clearly continued to shape their behaviors, attitudes and perceptions, which was evident through their low utilization of healthcare.

The concept of distributed health literacy, which refers to how health literacy skills and practices are distributed through social networks [36, 37], is applicable to this study’s context. The participants in this study may very well draw on their social networks for support with certain health-literacy related tasks such as interacting with health professionals and making decisions about their health. The distribution of health literacy has been shown to positively impact health management and related decision-making processes [38]. Given the participants’ infrequent use of healthcare services revealed by this study, distributed literacy may not be in strong effect in this specific population. Future studies may look further into the role of specific social networks in facilitating health related experiences. This may point to a greater need for community-based programs that focus on using existing social structures to maximize impact in behavioral and health change across communities.

Another potential barrier to health literacy among the participants was their lack of familiarity with the concept of preventive medicine. Being unfamiliar with medical concepts is a characteristic of low health literacy and can contribute to the communication gap between patients and providers [39]. Patients with low health literacy as a result of poor health knowledge are also more likely to ask fewer questions, which widens the knowledge gap and is associated with adverse health outcomes [40].

An individual’s social and cultural contexts are inextricably linked to how they perceive and act on health information. The results of this study show how culture and language help set the stage for application of health literacy skills. The participants often linked their actions to the presence of cultural differences that deterred them from following through on health-related tasks. Cultural mismatches have been shown to contribute to disparities in health experienced by racial, ethnic, and minority groups [41, 42]. Additional studies have shown that when controlling for health literacy, racial and ethnic disparities in health care quality and outcomes disappear [43]. Low health literacy is in turn a key cause and effect of these disparities.

Stigma also played an important role in generating negative health behaviors in CHB. The manifestation of stigma through cultural reinforcement resulted in establishing shame, disgrace, and humiliation among those with CHB. This led to participants deliberately choosing not to seek care, leading to delayed monitoring of CHB conditions, treatment, and critical disease maintenance (Table 4). In addition, a lack of health literacy could have potentially contributed to experiences with stigma, resulting in negative health consequences.

Healthcare systems and providers

Healthcare providers and public health systems play critical roles in governing health literacy since they can affect the degree and ease with which people find and utilize healthcare systems and services. A lack of knowledge among healthcare providers across various aspects of CHB such as the prevalence of HBV in high-risk populations, clinical sequelae, and management can be detrimental for populations at risk. While detailed guidelines on these topics are already in place and updated regularly, studies continue to point to a lack of knowledge among health care providers as well as a failure to follow these guidelines [44]. A survey of primary care providers in San Francisco [45] showed that 30% of respondents were not able to identify the correct test to use for diagnosing chronic HBV infection. In addition, Chu [46] found that only 18–30% of Asian American primary care providers who treat Asian American adult patients reported routinely testing them for HBV infection in their practices.

In agreement with these studies, a majority of the participants in the present study said they were not satisfied with the care they had received. Many also felt that there was a lack of medical expertise in their communities. Participants were often unsure of where to access care but mentioned that community centers were helpful in locating doctors within the community (Table 5).

Culturally competent interventions for CHB

The Institute of Medicine [47] has recognized that health disparities result from a lack of cultural competence in care and gaps in health literacy and has recommended strategic approaches to training that will help prepare health professionals to recognize and take on these problems. This study highlighted numerous culture-specific barriers to healthcare, emphasizing the need for culturally competent health services, especially in today’s increasingly diverse population. These barriers elucidated the lack of health literacy and negative health behaviors among the study population.

To counter the effects of barriers to health literacy and access to care, innovative health and educational services should be designed to account for the intricacies in health literacy approaches targeting diverse populations [48, 49]. In fact, various novel initiatives and strategies have been employed to resolve health literacy deficits with respect to CHB. An intervention created YouTube channels aimed at facilitating the understanding of the history and pathophysiology of CHB [50]. In addition, culturally appropriate photonovels have been developed to prevent CHB and liver cancer [51]. These photonovels feature culturally tailored components, such as faces of people in the same ethnic group playing central characters in the stories, and storylines drawn from common cultural experiences. This approach has been effectively used as a means of participatory education that maximizes the learning experience through active involvement of the target population.

Community-based initiatives can also play a crucial role in mitigating deficiencies in health literacy [52, 53]. As pointed out by participants, KCS, which provided the HBV screening and educational programs served as a major resource to obtain healthcare needs (Tables 4 and 5). KCS, for instance, offered extensive services including screening programs, vaccination, and linkage to Korean-speaking physicians in their community who could provide culturally competent care.

Limitations of the study

There are several limitations to this study. The current study population age ranged between 20 and 69, excluding younger and older subjects. Thus, the under- or over-representation of certain age groups in this study could have affected the results, as not all age groups face the same barriers, and perceptions of healthcare interactions also vary by age [54]. Another limitation is that this study could not account for the Korean American CHB patients who do not visit KCS and similar programs. These harder to reach populations may have different barriers to accessing care that were not detected in this study.

Conclusion

Asian Americans are highly vulnerable to poor health outcomes from chronic HBV. We have identified and evaluated self-perceived sociocultural barriers to CHB care in an Asian American population. These barriers impact the community’s health literacy, influencing the levels of healthcare utilization and of screening and preventative behaviors. These findings may help inform future strategies and programs built around culturally competent health literacy frameworks. Given the significant lack of access to care in the culturally tailored program these participants were attending, there may be factors both related and unrelated to health literacy that hinder the proper use of these resources and the advancement of care. This warrants further exploration of the multidimensional nature of health literacy, an essential skillset which allows people to make decisions about their health and serves as the gateway to optimal health.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CHB:

Chronic hepatitis B

HbsAg:

Hepatitis B surface antigen seropositive

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

KCS:

Korean Community Services

References

  1. Collaborators PO. Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(6):383–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30056-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO News. (2019). Hepatitis B. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim HS, Rotundo L, Yang JD, Kothari N, Feurdean M, Ruhl C, Unalp-arida A. Racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence and awareness of hepatitis B virus infection and immunity in the United States. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24(11):1052–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.12735.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Serag H, McGlynn KA, Graham GN, So S, Howell CD, Fang T, Anderson JT, Thiel TK. Achieving health equity to eliminate racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in HBV- and HCV-associated liver disease. J Fam Pract. 2010;59(4 Suppl):S37–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Forde KA. Ethnic disparities in chronic hepatitis B infection: African Americans and Hispanic Americans. Curr Hepatol Rep. 2017;16(2):105–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-017-0348-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ott JJ, Stevens GA, Groeger J, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection. Vaccine. 2012;30(12):2212–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.116.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roberts H, Kruszon-Moran D, Ly KN, Hughes E, Iqbal K, Jiles RB, Holmberg SD. Prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in US households. Hepatology. 2016;63(2):388–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28109.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Camarota, S.A., & Zeigler, K. (2018). Record 44.5 Million Immigrants in 2017: Non-Mexico Latin American, Asian, and African populations grew most Center for Immigration Studies Report, Sept 2018. https://cis.org/Report/Record-445-Million-Immigrants-2017

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim BH, Kim WR. Epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States. Clin Liver Dis. 2018;12(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/cld.732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. NFID (National Foundation for Infectious Diseases). (2018). Call to Action- Preventing Hepatitis B in US Adults through Increased Vaccination Rates among At-Risk Groups. https://www.nfid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/cta-hep-b-at-risk-adults.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim LH, Nguyen VG, Trinh HN, Li J, Zhang JQ, Nguyen MH. Low treatment rates in patients meeting guideline criteria in diverse practice settings. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59(9):2091–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3283-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Toy M. (2017). Population Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Chronic Hepatitis B Diagnosis, Care, and Treatment in the United States. In: Strom BL, Buckley GJ, editors. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on a National Strategy for the Elimination of Hepatitis B and C. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442231/.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Philbin MM, Erby LAH, Lee S, Juon HS. Hepatitis B and liver cancer among three Asian American sub-groups: a focus group inquiry. J Immigr Minor Health. 2012;14(5):858–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-011-9523-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Leung N. Chronic hepatitis B in Asian women of childbearing age. Hepatol Int. 2009;3(Suppl 1):24–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-009-9142-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Morikawa K, Shimazaki T, Takeda R, Izumi T, Umumura M, Sakamoto N. Hepatitis B: progress in understanding chronicity, the innate immune response, and cccDNA protection. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(18):337. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.08.54.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tong MJ, Pan CQ, Han SB, Lu DS, Raman S, Hu KQ, Lim JK, Hann HW, Min AD. An expert consensus for the management of chronic hepatitis B in Asian Americans. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47(8):1181–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14577.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tarocchi M, Polvani S, Marroncini G, Galli A. Molecular mechanism of hepatitis B virus-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(33):11630–40. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.11630.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong R, Corley DA. Racial and ethnic variations in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence within the United States. Am J Med. 2008;121(6):525–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu KQ, Pan CQ, Goodwin D. Barriers to screening for hepatitis B virus infection in Asian Americans. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:3163–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1840-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang DM, Stewart SL. Social-cultural, traditional beliefs, and health system barriers of hepatitis B screening among Hmong Americans: a case study. Cancer. 2018;124(Suppl 7(Suppl 7)):1576–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31096.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jorgensen C, Chen S, Carnes CA, Block J, Chen D, Caballero J, Moraras K, Cohen C. "know hepatitis B:" a multilingual communications campaign promoting testing for hepatitis B among Asian Americans and Pacific islanders. Public Health Rep (Washington, DC : 1974). 2016;131(Suppl 2(Suppl 2)):35–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549161310S206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tram T. Understanding cultural barriers in hepatitis B virus infection. Cleve Clin J Med. 2009;76(3). https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.76.s3.03.

  23. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Assessing Interactions Among Social, Behavioral, and Genetic Factors in Health. In: Hernandez LM, Blazer DG, editors. Genes, Behavior, and the Social Environment: Moving Beyond the Nature/Nurture Debate. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2006. p. 2. The Impact of Social and Cultural Environment on Health. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19924/.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keim-Malpass J, Letzkus LC, Kennedy C. Health literacy and the affordable care act: a policy analysis for children with special health care needs in the USA. Risk Manage Healthc Policy. 2015;8:31–6. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S80699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cutilli CC, Bennett IM. Understanding the health literacy of America: results of the National Assessment of adult literacy. Orthop Nurs. 2009;28(1):27–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NOR.0000345852.22122.d6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. White S, Chen J, Atchison R. Relationship of preventive health practices and health literacy: a national study. Am J Health Behav. 2008;32(3):227–42. https://doi.org/10.5555/ajhb.2008.32.3.227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bostock S, Steptoe A. Association between low functional health literacy and mortality in older adults: longitudinal cohort study. Br Med J. 2012;344:e1602. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Viera A, et al. Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23126607

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rikard RV, Thompson MS, McKinney J, Beauchamp A. Examining health literacy disparities in the United States: a third look at the National Assessment of adult literacy (NAAL). BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):975. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3621-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Do, T.N., & Nam, S. (2011). Knowledge, awareness and medical practice of Asian Americans/Pacific islanders on chronic hepatitis B infection, 31(3), 341-364. doi: https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2011.31.3.341.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee HO, Lee OJ, Kim S, Hontz I, Warner A. Differences in knowledge of hepatitis B among Korean immigrants in two cities in the rocky mountain region. Asian Nurs Res. 2007;1(3):165–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1976-1317(08)60019-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor VM, Cho JH, Yasui Y, Li L, Burke N, Jackson JC. Hepatitis B awareness, testing, and knowledge among Vietnamese American men and women. J Community Health. 2005;30(6):477–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-005-7282-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Choe JH, Taylor VM, Yutaka Y, Burke N, Nguyen T, Acorda E, Jackson JC. Health care access and sociodemographic factors associated with hepatitis B testing in Vietnamese American men. J Immigr Minor Health. 2006;8(3):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-006-9322-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dahl TF, Cowie BC, Biggs BA, Leder K, MacLachlan JH, Marshall C. Health literacy in patients with chronic hepatitis B attending a tertiary hospital in Melbourne: a questionnaire based survey. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:537. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-537.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Castro-Sanchez E, Chang PWS, Vila-Candel R, Escobedo AA, Holmes AH. Health literacy and infectious diseases: why does it matter? Int J Infect Dis. 2016;43:103–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2015.12.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Edwards M, Wood F, Davies M, Edwards A. 'Distributed health literacy': longitudinal qualitative analysis of the roles of health literacy mediators and social networks of people living with a long-term health condition. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1180–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Abreu L, Arriscado-Nunes J, Taylor P, Silva S. The role of distributed health literacy in asthma integrated care: a public medical context from Portugal. Int J Integr Care. 2018;18(2):18. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Abreu L, Nunes JA, Taylor P, Silva S. Distributed health literacy among people living with type 2 diabetes in Portugal: defining levels of awareness and support. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26:90–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kripalani S, Weiss BD. Teaching about health literacy and clear communication. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(8):888–90 /10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00543.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dewalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone MP. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(12):1228–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Betancourt JR, Green AR, Carrillo JE, Park ER. Cultural Competence and Health Care Disparities: Key perspectives and trends. Health Aff. 2005;24(2):499–505. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jackson CS, Gracia JN. Addressing health and health-care disparities: the role of a diverse workforce and the social determinants of health. Public health reports (Washington, DC : 1974). 2014;129(Suppl 2(Suppl 2)):57–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549141291S211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Volandes AE, Paasche-Orlow MK. Health Literacy, Health Inequality and a Just Healthcare System. Am J Bioeth. 2007;7(10):5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Colvin, H.M., Mitchell, A.E. Editors. (2010). Hepatitis and liver Cancer: a National Strategy for prevention and control of hepatitis B and C. Institute of medicine of the national academies.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lai CL, Yuen MF. The natural history of chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2017;14(1):6–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2007.00909.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chu D. (2009). Hepatitis B virus screening practices of Asian-American primary care physicians who treat Asian adults living in the United States. Washington DC: Paper presented as an oral presentation at the 13th international symposium on viral hepatitis and liver disease; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rowlands G, Shaw A, Jaswal S, Smith S, Harpham T. Health literacy and the social determinants of health: a qualitative model from adult learners. Health Promot Int. 2015;32(1):130–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sun X, Shi Y, Zeng Q, Wang Y, Du W, Wei N, Xie R, Chang C. Determinants of health literacy and health behavior regarding infectious respiratory diseases: a pathway model. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:261. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Lord HL, Newland J, Cama E, Treloar C, Levy MT. Understanding the phases of chronic hepatitis B; the problem and a novel solution using renamed phases, the hepatitis B bear and a video (see “understanding hepatitis B” on YouTube). Presented at the 65th annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Boston, MA, USA, November 7-11, 2014. Hepatology. 2014:1001A–2A.

  51. Lee S, Yoon H, Chen L, Juon HS. Culturally appropriate Photonovel development and process evaluation for hepatitis B prevention in Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese American communities. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112474003.

  52. Rein DB, Lesesne SB, Smith BD, Weinbaum CM. Models of community-based hepatitis B surface screening programs in the U.S. and their estimated outcomes and costs. Public Health Rep. 2011;126(4):560–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491112600412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Robotin MC, George J. Community-based hepatitis B screening: what works? Hepatol Int. 2014;8(3):478–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-014-9562-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. DeVoe JE, Wallace LS, Fryer GE Jr. Patient age influences perceptions; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the work by the members and volunteers of the Korean Community Services.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from Gilead Foundation. The funder partially financed the process of data collection and analysis. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SH conceived of the study, participated in the design of the study, and drafted the manuscript. SK, WV, and OK participated in the design of the study and performed statistical analysis. WV and OK participated in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Hyun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of an institutional research committee. This study was formally approved by the Institutional Review Board of Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA. Informed consent was obtained in written form.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None declared. There are no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

HBV Demographic Form. Survey assessing demographic and epidemiologic characteristics of participants.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyun, S., Ko, O., Kim, S. et al. Sociocultural barriers to hepatitis B health literacy in an immigrant population: a focus group study in Korean Americans. BMC Public Health 21, 404 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10441-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10441-4

Keywords

  • Chronic hepatitis B (CHB)
  • Community health
  • Health disparities
  • Health literacy
  • Immigrant population