Skip to main content
Download PDF

The time spent sitting does not always mean a low level of physical activity

BMC Public Health volume 20, Article number: 317 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The problem of spending most of the day in a sitting position concerns all people, regardless of their age. Unfortunately, this trend is more and more often observed among young people.

The aim of the study was to assess self-reported physical activity and time spent sitting among students of different fields of health related faculty.

Methods

The study group included 216 students (22.3 ± 1.8 years of age) of the Medical University of Lodz: physiotherapy students (n = 101), pharmacy students (n = 73), and dietetics students (n = 42). The time spent sitting and physical activity level were assessed based on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long version.

Results

The time spent sitting among health related faculty students was on average more than 46 h a week (2781.8 ± 1238.5 MET-minutes/week). Regarding all the students the pharmacy students spent most time sitting (3086.0 ± 1032.1 MET-minutes/week), while the dietetics students spent the least (2215.7 ± 1230.1 MET-minutes/week). Taking into account the physical activity level almost 65% of all the students were in a high category (mainly physiotherapy students). Only 1.4% of all the surveyed students were classified as the low physical activity category. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences (P = 0.6880) between the time spent sitting and level of physical activity among all students.

Conclusions

Students of medical universities spend too much hours on sitting, mostly 5–8 h a day. Despite this, they undertake various activities due to which their level of physical activity is moderate or even high. Therefore, it cannot be unequivocally stated that there is a relationship between the time spent sitting and physical activity level.

Peer Review reports

Background

Many studies report that people are inactive most of the day and spend their time mainly sitting [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Such a sedentary lifestyle is associated with a greater risk of cardiovascular, metabolic and cancer diseases, which can lead to an increased overall mortality [1,2,3, 7].

The problem of the decline in the level of physical activity while increasing the time spent sitting is global and affects people of all ages [1, 8,9,10,11]. Research studies highlight that this situation is particularly characteristic for young people [1, 12,13,14]. One of the mentioned groups is university youth. University studies are the last stage in young people’s lives at which they have a chance of acquiring proper knowledge and healthy habits before beginning an independent adult life [15]. It is extremely important to develop such an attitude among students of medical universities. Apart from all the health benefits they themselves may get from physical activity, in their future work they will be much better prepared to promote a healthy lifestyle among their patients [16,17,18]. Further research will allow for a thorough examination of the current physical activity level and the sedentary behaviour among this group of individuals. To the best of our knowledge this study is the first one to investigate the amount of time during waking hours students of health related faculty spend sitting and then to compare the obtained results with their physical activity level.

The aim of the study was to assess sitting and activity among students of different fields of health related faculty, based on the long version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LV). In the following study, we hypothesized that sitting is not associated with physical activity.

Methods

The study was conducted in 2018, among 216 students (44 males and 172 females; 22.3 ± 1.8 years of age) of the Medical University of Lodz. The study included physiotherapy students - 101 (46.8%), pharmacy students - 73 (33.8%), and dietetics students - 42 (19.4%). Students who studied only in one of the listed fields of health related faculty were included into the study. The study excluded those who studied simultaneously at more than one of the mentioned fields.

Participation in the study was voluntary. The students were informed about the aims and methods of the study and then they provided written consents for participation in it. Afterwards, the students were asked to complete the long version of IPAQ. They answered questions by indicating the number of days per week and time (in hours and minutes) they spent walking, being involved in moderate, vigorous intensity activities and sitting. The questionnaire referred to the physical activity of the last seven days. Each single activity had to take at least 10 min to be included. The students completed the IPAQ-LV in the presence of an interviewer, who explained any doubts to the respondents. The confidentiality of the data and the anonymity of the participants were ensured throughout the whole study.

When the questionnaires were collected, the data contained therein was processed in accordance with the scoring protocol available at www.ipaq.ki.se. Based on that information about the time spent sitting during the whole week and average day was obtained and all the participants were classified into the appropriate physical activity levels: low, moderate, high.

Statistical analysis

The data in this study was presented as mean values with standard errors.

The relationship between the time spent sitting and the level of physical activity was assessed by ANOVA analysis. The Friedman’s post-hoc was also calculated.

All the analyses were carried out using STATISTICA (StatSoft, Inc. version 13, www.statsoft.com) and P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

First of all, the reliability of the long version of the IPAQ was evaluated by determining the internal consistency. The internal consistency (coefficient Cronbach’s α) for the IPAQ was 0.62, which indicated a moderately acceptable reliability and internal consistency. The subscales of IPAQ Cronbach-Alpha reliability coefficient were observed to vary between 0.57 to 0.62.

Based on data collected from IPAQ-LV, it was established that almost 65% of the students represented a high level of physical activity. In this category physiotherapy students formed the largest group (72.3%). Whereas, the moderate activity category was most often represented by dietetics students (41.1%). Only 1.4% of all the surveyed students were classified as representing a low physical activity level (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of physical activity levels and the time spend sitting according to the IPAQ-LV, among the students of different fields of health related faculty
Full size table

Taking into account the time spent sitting it turned out that all students spent this way on average 2781.8 ± 1238.5 MET-minutes/week. A detailed analysis of particular fields of health related faculty revealed that the pharmacy students spent on average more than seven hours a day sitting (3086.0 ± 1032.1 MET-minutes/week), physiotherapy students - almost seven (2797.4 ± 1307.0 MET-minutes/week), while the dietetics students about five hours a day (2215.7 ± 1230.1 MET-minutes/week) (Table 1).

The comparison of the students of different fields of health related faculty in terms of their time spent sitting showed statistically significant differences between dietetics and pharmacy students (d = 0.766; g = 0.785; P = 0.001), as well as dietetics and physiotherapy students (d = 0.458; g = 0.453; P = 0.015). In both cases, the dietetics students spent the least time sitting.

When assessing the dependency between the time that students spent sitting with their level of physical activity according to IPAQ-LV, it was observed that despite the declared many hours of sedentary behaviour, the vast majority of students were highly physically active. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences (P = 0.6880) between the time spent sitting and level of physical activity among all students. A detailed analysis of this relationships among students of particular fields of health related faculty also did not reveal statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). The characteristics of the time spent sitting and the level of physical activity among all students and students of particular fields of health related faculty was presented in the Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The comparison of the time spent sitting and physical activity level among all students and students of particular fields of health related faculty. (L Low, M Moderate, H High)

Full size image

Discussion

The beneficial effects of physical activity on health are emphasized more and more often. At the same time, it is also mentioned that insufficient physical activity or sedentary lifestyle may lead to the development of many diseases and increase general mortality. In this context, it seems important to conduct research that will determine the level of activity and time spent sitting in different groups and populations. One of the groups whose lifestyle should be monitored are students of medical universities. The relation between physical activity and the time spent sitting has an impact not only on their health, but indirectly it also contributes to the promotion of specific healthy habits among patients with whom they will work in the future. For this reason, in our study we focused primarily on the estimation of the time students spend sitting. It was found that on average they spend more than 46 h a week (2781.8 ± 1238.5 MET-minutes/week) and almost seven hours a day in a sitting position. These results are similar to those obtained in the other studies. For example, Papathanasiou et al. noticed that students spent more than seven hours a day (about 50 h a week) sitting [19], while Loginov et al. observed that students of general universities spent about 50 h a week sitting and those studying at technical universities about 44 h [20]. Another study assessing physical activity and sedentary time among students, however, conducting with using accelerometers not IPAQ, also showed that they spent on average 458.6 min/day being involved in sedentary activities, which corresponded to almost eight hours a day and 54 h a week [15].

The collected data enabled us to make a comparison between the level of physical activity and time spent sitting among the health related faculty students. Most of the students were highly or moderately physically active regardless of how much time they spent sitting. Rosenberg et al. showed that the participants who were sitting a lot were classified as representing physical activity categories just like those who were sitting the least [6]. In turn, Bauman et al. observed that as the time spent sitting became longer, the low level of physical activity increased whereas the high level decreased [1].

Based on the above-mentioned research it can be said that time spent sitting is not associated with physical activity. That is why it can-not be directly interpreted that people who spend many hours sitting are inactive. Much more often they follow current recommendations for physical activity and can be classified as moderately or even highly active people. For example, students who spend most of the day learning in a sitting position can also go to the gym or choose swimming or cycling for a couple of hours during the week. This way they are simultaneously sedentary and physically active people.

A major strength of this study is that we focused on health related faculty students, because this group of students has so far been rarely analyzed. We chose students of Physiotherapy, Pharmacy and Dietetics because in their future work they will spend many hours with their patients, during which they establish a close relationship, thanks to which they often become a role model and can transfer important knowledge about an active lifestyle.

Our study has some limitations. First of all, the number of students in particular fields of health related faculty were not the same, which could have influenced the results. However, this is due to the number of students in individual fields of study. Some fields are very numerous, while others are not.

Secondly, we used the IPAQ and self-report surveys, which may result in over- or underestimation of the results. On the other hand, the IPAQ is a widely used tool for assessment of physical activity and time spent sitting. It can be used in large study populations since it is inexpensive, simple and non-invasive [6, 18, 19, 21, 22]. Its validity and reliability have been proven in numerous studies [6, 23,24,25]. Moreover, to avoid the problem of misreporting due to a lack of understanding of the IPAQ questions [22], we introduced an interviewer to the study, so our results can be compared with other international studies.

Future research on sedentary behaviours should be conducted on large, standardized groups using objective measurement methods. It is worth assessing the time spent sitting in different areas of life [1, 6] as well as the types of sedentary activities to which people devote the most time because not all of them are equally harmful to health [4]. This will allow for supplementing healthy lifestyle recommendations with information on time spent sitting. It may be useful for many people to determine the minimum time spent sitting that is safe for health [1, 3]. Research has shown that modification of sedentary behaviours may bring more promising results in terms of promoting a healthy lifestyle than increasing a physical activity level [5].

Conclusions

Based on the obtained results, many hours spent sitting should not be associated with physical inactivity. Most of the students of health related faculty perform physical activity but at the same time spend too much time in sitting position. Therefore, different university programmes should be develop to give more opportunities for students to be more active during their university classes. Moreover, while monitoring sedentary behaviour it would be recommended to complete it by physical activity assessment.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

H:

High

IPAQ/IPAQ-LV:

the International Physical Activity Questionnaire/ the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long version

L:

low

M:

moderate

MET:

the metabolic equivalent of task

PA:

the physical activity

vs:

versus

References

  1. Bauman A, Ainsworth BE, Sallis JF, et al. The descriptive epidemiology of sitting. A 20-country comparison using the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ). Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):228–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sigmundová D, Sigmund E, Hamrik Z, Kalman M, Pavelka J, Frömel K. Sedentary behaviour and physical activity of randomized sample of Czech adults aged 20-64 years: IPAQ and GPAQ studies between 2002 and 2011. Cent Eur J Publ Heal. 2015;23(Suppl):91–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauman A, Van der Ploeg H, Chau J. Sitting and sedentary Behaviours: a public health problem? Research Update. 2012;19(1):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andrade-Gómez E, García-Esquinas E, Ortolá R, Martínez-Gómez D, Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Watching TV has a distinct sociodemographic and lifestyle profile compared with other sedentary behaviors: A nationwide population-based study. PLoS One. 2017;5;12(12):e0188836.

  5. Gardner B, Smith L, Lorencatto F, Hamer M. How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenberg DE, Bull FC, Marshall AL, Sallis JF, Bauman AE. Assessment of sedentary behavior with the international physical activity questionnaire. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(Suppl 1):30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(5):998–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, Pate RR, Troiano RP. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(7):875–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caspersen CJ, Pereira MA, Curran KM. Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):1601–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallal PC, Matsudo S, Farias JC Jr. Measurement of physical activity by self-report in low- and middle-income countries: more of the same is not enough. J Phys Act and Health. 2012;9(Suppl 1):88–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sousa GR, Silva DAS. Sedentary behavior based on screen time: prevalence and associated sociodemographic factors in adolescents. Cien Saude Colet. 2017;22(12):4061–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergier J, Kapka-Skrzypczak L, Biliński P, Paprzycki P, Wojtyła A. Physical activity of polish adolescents and young adults according to IPAQ: a population based study. Ann Agr Env Med. 2012;19(1):109–15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jurakić D, Pedisić Z, Andrijasević M. Physical activity of Croatian population: cross-sectional study using international physical activity questionnaire. Croat Med J. 2009;50(2):165–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Piccinno A, Colella D. Differences in cardiovascular fitness of Italian high-school adolescents according to different physical activity levels assessed by IPAQ-A: a cross-sectional study. Sport Sci Health. 2017;13(1):149–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oyeyemi AL, Muhammed S, Oyeyemi AY, Adegoke BOA. Patterns of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time: are Nigerian health professional students complying with public health guidelines? PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0190124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaweł-Dąbrowska D, Einhorn J, Połtyn-Zaradna K, Zatońska K. A physical activity assessment of Wroclaw Medical University students with IPAQ - long questionnaire: a cross sectional study. Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. 2016;18(1):12–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dąbrowska-Galas M, Plinta R, Dąbrowska J, Skrzypulec-Plinta V. Physical activity in students of the Medical University of Silesia in Poland. Phys Ther. 2013;93(3):384–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chathuranga R, Chathurani S, Priyanga R, Ranil J, Ayodya R, Andrew PH, Neil K. Physical inactivity among physiotherapy undergraduates: exploring the knowledge-practice gap. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2016;8:39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Papathanasiou G, Georgoudis G, Papandreou M, Spyropoulos P, Georgakopoulos D, Kalfakakou V, Evangelou A. Reliability measures of the short international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) in Greek young adults. Hell J Cardiol. 2009;50(4):283–94.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Loginov SI. Nikolaev AYu. Vetoshnikov AYu: Sagadeeva SG. Physical activity of students of two universities in Surgut according to international questionnaire IPAQ. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture and Sport; 2015. http://www.teoriya.ru/en/node/4097. .

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mynarski W, Rozpara M, Czapla K, Garbaciak W. Aerobic capacity of students with different levels of physical activity as assessed by IPAQ. J Hum Kinet. 2009;21:89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bandeira FM, Freitas MP, Laszlo M, Silva MC, Hallal PC, Rombaldi AJ. Mode of administration does matter: comparability study using IPAQ. Revista de Educação Física. 2015;21:370–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hagströmer M, Oja P, Sjöström M. The international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(6):755–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim Y, Park I, Kang M. Convergent validity of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ): meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(3):440–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sports Medicine Institute, Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Medical University of Lodz, Pomorska 251, 92-213, Lodz, Poland

    Ewelina Matusiak-Wieczorek, Anna Lipert & Anna Jegier

  2. Pharmaceutical Biotechnology Institute, Pharmaceutical Biology and Biotechnology Department, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland

    Ewa Kochan

Authors
  1. Ewelina Matusiak-Wieczorek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Lipert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ewa Kochan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna Jegier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Concept/idea/research design (EMW, AL, EK, AJ), Writing (EMW, AL), Data collection (EMW, AL, EK), Data analysis (EMW, AL), Project management (EMW, AL, AJ), Providing participants (EMW, AL EK), Providing facilities/equipment (EMW, AL), Consultation (AJ). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewelina Matusiak-Wieczorek.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Medical University of Lodz (RNN/169/11/KE), and all volunteers provided written informed consent prior to participating.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matusiak-Wieczorek, E., Lipert, A., Kochan, E. et al. The time spent sitting does not always mean a low level of physical activity. BMC Public Health 20, 317 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8396-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8396-3

Keywords

  • Sitting time
  • Sedentary behaviour
  • Physical activity level
  • IPAQ

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us