Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | BMC Public Health

Fig. 4

From: A systematic review of sexual and reproductive health interventions for young people in humanitarian and lower-and-middle-income country settings

Fig. 4

Quality assessment results (nā€‰=ā€‰17) with modifications to EPHPP criteria. Blinding criteria modified: a rating of strong was assigned when both assessors and participants were blinded, a rating of moderate was assigned when either assessors or participants were blinded, and a rating of weak was assigned when neither were blinded or it could not be determined. Confounders criteria modified: age, gender and SES were considered as the important potential confounders

Back to article page