Skip to main content

Social and economic variables related with Paraquat self-poisoning: an ecological study



Paraquat self-poisonings constitute a significant contributor to the global burden of suicide. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between social and economic variables with the incidence of self-poisoning with Paraquat in the northeast of Colombia.


Records of 154 cases of self-poisoning with Paraquat and several socio-economic variables of six regions of northeast of Colombia were analyzed.


Most of the cases were mestizos, farmworkers, between 20 and 29 years, with intentional exposure using the oral route. Multivariate analyses revealed significant associations among the incidence of self-poisoning with PQ with the ecological factors such as poverty greater than 30% (IRR 15.9 IC95% 5.56–44.72), land Gini index < 0.7 (IRR 7.11 IC95% 3.58–14.12), private health insurance < 40% (IRR 3.39 IC95% 1.30–8.82) and planted area > 10% (IRR 2.47 IC95% 1.60–3.80).


There is a relationship between ecological factors and, as such, this study opens the way to further developments in the field.

Peer Review reports


Suicide is still a significant public health problem worldwide with at least 800,000 deaths each year plus up to approximately 25 million non-lethal suicide attempts [1, 2]. Pesticide self-poisonings constitute a significant contributor to the global burden of suicide, accounting for at least one-in-seven fatal cases [3]. Despite the reduction in the number of pesticide suicides worldwide since 2006, the pesticides self-poisoning is still growing in Latin America accounting for approximately 10% of fatalities in this region [3]. The scenario could be worst, considering that the pesticide industry is forecast to grow annually by approximately 6% over the next few years in South America [4].

Suicidal behavior is a multifactorial event with diverse biological (e.g., sex, age, mental disorders, genetic loading, normal physical conditions, etc.) and sociocultural (e.g., unemployment, low income, lack of social support networks, ethnicity) determinants [5,6,7,8]. Most of these sociocultural determinants can be found in rural areas in developing nations [9]. However, studies have no focused on the relationship of these determinants with suicide attempts due to pesticides [9].

Among agrochemical products, paraquat is one of the most widely used for farming but also is commonly involved with self-poisoning [10,11,12]. After acute PQ poisoning, the fatalities rate exceeds 70% [9]. For example, according to the National Institute of Health in Colombia, pesticides resulted in 1231 deaths in the period between 2008 and 2015, with a worrying positive trend accentuated in the northeast of this country [13,14,15,16,17]. Here we reported a side product of the study entitled “Burden of paraquat poisoning in the department of Antioquia, Colombia” published elsewhere [18]. We consider that it is necessary to generate evidence to identify potentially modifiable social characteristics that allow reducing this problem. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between social and economic variables with the cases of self-poisoning with PQ in the northeast of Colombia in the period between 2010 and 2016.


Type of study

A mixed ecological study; ecological because it had the municipality as the unit of analysis, and mixed as it had, simultaneously, an exploratory character as well as a group comparison design [19].


No personally identifiable information was recorded all information obtained from health surveillance systems were kept confidential. Consent was not required because this was a study that used secondary sources of information already published. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Antioquia (2015-4690). “under ‘Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate.

Case definition

We included all consecutive patients with self-poisoning by paraquat, admitted in all hospital centers of the Department of Antioquia and reported by e-Formulary or in a physical paper to the Regional Epidemiological Surveillance System (SIVIGILA by its acronyms in Spanish) from January 1st, 2010 to the December 31st, 2016. This report is mandatory for all health care providers and made by personnel trained from each hospital. Antioquia is one of the 32 departments of Colombia, located in the central northwestern part of Colombia with a population of 6,613,118 [20]. This department can be subdivided into six regions: Magdalena Medio, Bajo Cauca, Urabá, Nordeste, Occidente, Norte, Oriente, Suroeste and Valle de Aburra.


The number of citizens in each region was taken from the official census established by the National Administrative Department for Statistics in Colombia [15, 21].


The incidence rate was taken as the study’s dependent variable and was calculated for those regions corresponding to report to the SIVIGILA. The independent variables examined by region were the following: (i) amount of area planted with permanent crops, (ii) quality of life-index calculated by National Administrative Department for Statistics [21], which characterizes the living conditions of Colombians by related to housing (i.e, materials used in walls, floors and presence of public services), people (i.e., education, health, child care, labor force, expenses and income, etc.), and households (i.e., possession of assets and perception of the boss or spouse on living conditions in the home), (iii) net enrollment rate, that is the relation between the students enrolled that are in the appropriate age range for each educational level and the population in age of such school, (iv) the poverty level, indicates the percentage of people whose income is below the poverty line meaning that cannot satisfy their most basic needs, (v) drinking water coverage, (vi) private health insurance, (vii) heavy metal poisoning rate, (viii) Gini index distribution (20), that indicates the concentration of land ownership; and (ix) rate per 100,000 inhabitants of cases reported to SIVIGILA with psychological violence, physical violence, deprivation and negligence or suicide attempt [22].

These variables were dichotomized using the following cut-offs: (i) planted area of 10%, (b) the quality of life variable of 60% (c) the poverty level of 30%, (d) drinking water coverage of 40%, (e) enrolment rate of 70%, (f) the Gini index of land of 0.7, (g) deprivation and negligence of 8.70, (h) the heavy metal poisoning rate of 0.3 and (i) private health insurance of 40%. These cut-off points were used as suggested by the department of national economic planning [23].

Database and analysis

Microsoft Excel 2016 was used to construct the database. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated using Poisson’s regression. We obtain at the incidence rate ratio by exponentiating the Poisson regression coefficient. The Poisson regression coefficients are the difference between the logs of expected counts to incidence rate ratio. Modeling and variable selection in the multivariate analysis were made following Greenland’s recommendations [24], We use The method of forward selection as follows: 1. Begin with no terms in the model. 2. Find the term that, when added to the model, achieves the largest value of R-squared. Enter this term into the model. 3. Continue adding terms until a preset limit on the maximum number of terms in the model is reached. All statistical analysis was done using Stata 11.0®.


In the period of the study, 154 cases of PQ poisoning were registered to SIVIGILA in Antioquia, of which 140 subjects were related to suicidal attempts. Most of the cases were presented in Uraba (n = 58), Oriente (n = 24), Norte (n = 20) and Bajo Cauca (n = 18). The case fatality in this study was 91 per 1000 patients (CI 95%: 46–136 per 1000 patients). Highest mortality rates were seen males, between 30 to 39 years old, with intentional ingestion of PQ. In general, the affected were mestizos and white, farmworkers, most of them between 20 and 29 years (n = 88, 57%), with intentional exposure per oral route, with a mean of 0.83 (IQR 0.002) days of length of delay between the onset/discovery/recognition of signs and symptoms of poisoning and a patient’s first visit to a health care provider.

In the bivariate analysis, important associations with self-poisoning by PQ were found: planted area higher than 10% (IRR = 5.14; CI, 3.675–7.19), quality of life less than 60% (IRR = 0.17; CI, 0.125–0.241), poverty level higher than 30% (IRR = 9.34; CI, 6.474–13.471), drinking water coverage higher than 40% (IRR = 1.94; CI, 1.314–2.862), net enrolment rate less than 70% (IRR = 4.40; CI, 3.204–6.043), land Gini index less than 0.7 (IRR = 19.04; CI, 10.564–34.325), deprivation and negligence higher than 8.70 (IRR = 2.10; CI, 1.519–2.916), heavy metal poisoning rate higher than 0.3 (IRR = 1.95; CI, 1.299–2.915) and private health insurance less than 40% (IRR = 0.13; CI, 0.088–0.192) see Fig. 1. After modeling in the multivariate analysis, significant associations among the incidence of self-poisoning with PQ with independent variables were revelated such as poverty greater than 30%, land Gini index < 0.7, private health insurance < 40% and planted area > 10%, see Table 1.

Fig. 1

Graph showing the Incidence rate ratios (IRR) of self-poisoning by PQ

Table 1 Results obtained in the multivariate model


To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study relating economic inequalities in self-poisoning with PQ. This study demonstrates that poverty level, planted area, low equity of land distribution and lack of private health insurance were the most influential risk factors for self-poisoning with PQ in the northeast of Colombia.

These findings are highly consistent with previous reports in suicide for all causes, especially reported from developed countries [6,7,8, 25]. According to a systematic review, poverty, particularly in the form of worse economic status, diminished wealth, and unemployment is associated with suicidal ideations and behaviors [26]. In another study in 15 European countries, the suicide rate was negatively related to economic categorization; with affluent areas having the lowest rates and poor areas the highest of suicides [25]. Although the mechanisms of this relationship are unknown, income inequality can affect individuals by depression and feelings of hopelessness. Social and economic deprivations in more impoverished people, especially in rural areas, may make them disappointed and bring them closer to deciding to commit suicide [9] .

The lack of land distribution and planted area > 10% were independent risk factors associated with self-poisoning with PQ in our study. It is clear that regions with greater area planted have the higher risk of self-poisoning; especially if the farmers commonly stored more quantity of PQ within the household lacking education in good pesticide management [9, 27]. While in industrialized countries large-scale farming is practiced by a small number of landowners, in developing countries most of the farmers live in small areas of land and keep their supply of pesticides. These pesticides are generally are ease of availability and commonly stored within the household [28, 29]. Thus, the restriction on the use of pesticides is not enough to avoid this problem in developing countries; it must also be accompanied by government measures to improve the social conditions of farmers such as equality pi in the distribution of land. Indeed, areas with land Gini index < 0.7 have seven times more risk of cases of suicides by PQ. Also, areas without private health insurance – which in developing countries have better quality than public health system – have more risk of self-poisoning with PQ; this situation is due to the lack of legal health insurance by agricultural companies or small farmers. This is also reflected in the higher rates of informal work in these areas; which added to poverty, and inequality explain the high suicides rates in these regions. Intervention such as improved employment opportunities, welfare and mental health support services, as well as problem-solving skills development, may help farmers and reduce the burden of disease and suicides in poor areas [30, 31].

As this was an ecological study, it has potential limitations. Some other confounding variables could be no included in the present study. Nonetheless, when comparing our findings with those in previous descriptive and analytic studies, it was apparent that various of these studies also formerly associated poverty level or equity of land distribution with suicide for example. If information on birth and residence place had not been appropriately registered for reasons other than official ones, this study could have suffered from a selection bias. According to Susser [32], the exposure variables under consideration in this study were integral rather than to contextual. They were gathered from institutions with a long record in the analysis of ecological data and consequently, the risk of error in their classification should have been low. If the bias existed, it would have been non-differential, and the corresponding associations would have had tended to have a null value [33]. Although this study was carried out in the area with the highest incidence of PQ intoxication in the country, it is possible that the magnitude of these associations changes in areas with a lower incidence or other variables that were not included in the final model can be included or have interaction relationships not evidenced in this region of the country.


The present study addresses the issue of ecological associations in self-poisoning with paraquat and, as such, opens the way to further developments in the field. The results presented here were based on a strict definition of case and used multivariate analysis to determine risks after adjusting possible confounding variables.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article, and are available and freely accessible in the report of the socioeconomic profile of Antioquia [23].





Incidence rate ratios


  1. 1.

    Turecki G, Brent DA. Suicide and suicidal behaviour. Lancet. 2016;387:1227–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chang BP, Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Fox KR, Bentley KH, Kleiman EM, Nock MK. Biological risk factors for suicidal behaviors: a meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e887.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mew EJ, Padmanathan P, Konradsen F, Eddleston M, Chang SS, Phillips MR, Gunnell D. The global burden of fatal self-poisoning with pesticides 2006-15: systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2017;219:93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Global Pesticide Market - By Regions and Vendors - Market Size, Demand Forecasts, Industry Trends and Updates, Supplier Market Shares 2014–2020.  Accessed 11 Mar 2020.

  5. 5.

    Fernandez-Nino JA, Florez-Garcia VA, Astudillo-Garcia CI, Rodriguez-Villamizar LA. Weather and suicide: a decade analysis in the five largest capital cities of Colombia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7).

  6. 6.

    Bando DH, Brunoni AR, Bensenor IM, Lotufo PA. Suicide rates and income in Sao Paulo and Brazil: a temporal and spatial epidemiologic analysis from 1996 to 2008. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Qin P, Agerbo E, Mortensen PB. Suicide risk in relation to socioeconomic, demographic, psychiatric, and familial factors: a national register-based study of all suicides in Denmark, 1981-1997. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:765–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Takeuchi A, Sakano N, Miyatake N. Combined effects of working hours, income, and leisure time on suicide in all 47 prefectures of Japan. Ind Health. 2014;52:137–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gunnell D, Eddleston M. Suicide by intentional ingestion of pesticides: a continuing tragedy in developing countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:902–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chang SS, Lu TH, Eddleston M, Konradsen F, Sterne JA, Lin JJ, Gunnell D. Factors associated with the decline in suicide by pesticide poisoning in Taiwan: a time trend analysis, 1987-2010. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012;50:471–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bajo Bajo A, Sanz Ortega F, Santos Perez ME, Thomson Okatsu K, Zapico Alvarez N, Garcia Perez A. Fatal paraquat poisoning. An Med Interna. 1996;13:79–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Eddleston M, Adhikari S, Egodage S, Ranganath H, Mohamed F, Manuweera G, Azher S, Jayamanne S, Juzczak E, Sheriff MR, et al. Effects of a provincial ban of two toxic organophosphorus insecticides on pesticide poisoning hospital admissions. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012;50:202–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Perfil epidemiológico de las intoxicaciones por sustancias químicas en Colombia, 2008–2015. Accessed 11 Mar 2020.

  14. 14.

    Chaparro-Narvaez P, Castaneda-Orjuela C. Mortality due to pesticide poisoning in Colombia, 1998-2011. Biomedica. 2015;35(Spec):90–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Poblacion total segun grupos de edad, sexo y zona de subregiones y municipios-Antioquia. Accessed 11 Mar 2020.

  16. 16.

    Buendia-Rodriguez JA, Lopez-Gutierrez JJ, Garcia-Vega OA, Diaz-Rojas J, Sanchez-Villamil JP. Drug prescription patterns in patients attended at a middle- and high-complexity level institution. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2008;10:605–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Buendia JA, Zuluaga AF. Physicians insight about adverse drug reaction to frequently used medication groups in Bogota (Colombia). Biomedica. 2014;34:403–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Buendia JA, Chavarriaga GJR, Zuluaga AF. Burden of paraquat poisoning in the department of Antioquia, Colombia. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019;20:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Morgenstern H. Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. Am J Public Health. 1982;72:1336–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gobernación de Antioquia. Departamento Administrativo de Planeación. Anuario Estadístico de Antioquia, 2014 [electronic resource] Medellín: Departamento Administrativo de Planeación, 2014.

  21. 21.

    Encuesta nacional de calidad de vida. Accessed 11 Mar 2020.

  22. 22.

    Indicadores de Salud de Antioquia. Accessed 11 Mar 2020.

  23. 23.

    Perfil socioeconómico de Antioquia. Accessed 11 Mar 2020.

  24. 24.

    Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:340–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kazemi-Galougahi MH, Mansouri A, Akbarpour S, Bakhtiyari M, Sartipi M, Moradzadeh R. Income-related inequality in completed suicide across the provinces of Iran. Epidemiol Health. 2018;40:e2018012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Iemmi V, Bantjes J, Coast E, Channer K, Leone T, McDaid D, Palfreyman A, Stephens B, Lund C. Suicide and poverty in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:774–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Birtwistle J, Kelley R, House A, Owens D. Combination of self-harm methods and fatal and non-fatal repetition: a cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2017;218:188–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Phillips MR, Yang G, Zhang Y, Wang L, Ji H, Zhou M. Risk factors for suicide in China: a national case-control psychological autopsy study. Lancet. 2002;360:1728–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Latha KS, Bhat SM, D'Souza P. Suicide attempters in a general hospital unit in India: their socio-demographic and clinical profile--emphasis on cross-cultural aspects. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996;94:26–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Knipe DW, Chang SS, Dawson A, Eddleston M, Konradsen F, Metcalfe C, Gunnell D. Suicide prevention through means restriction: impact of the 2008-2011 pesticide restrictions on suicide in Sri Lanka. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0172893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Knipe DW, Gunnell D, Pearson M, Jayamanne S, Pieris R, Priyadarshana C, Weerasinghe M, Hawton K, Konradsen F, Eddleston M, Metcalfe C. Attempted suicide in Sri Lanka - an epidemiological study of household and community factors. J Affect Disord. 2018;232:177–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Susser M. The logic in ecological: I. the logic of analysis. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:825–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pearce N, Checkoway H, Kriebel D. Bias in occupational epidemiology studies. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64:562–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


None to declare.


This study was supported by COLCIENCIAS (grant number 833–2015). COLCIENCIAS is a state public entity, and the funds were obtained through a grant. With the funds of this grant, the personnel that participated in the design, analysis and publication of the data were financed. The funding (COLCIENCIAS). COLCIENCIAS do not participate in any of the stages of design, research development and manuscript writing.

Author information




All author (JAB, GJR,AFZ) contributed equally in this manuscript wit information collection, data analysis and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jefferson Antonio Buendía.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Antioquia (2015–4690).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buendía, J.A., Restrepo Chavarriaga, G.J. & Zuluaga, A.F. Social and economic variables related with Paraquat self-poisoning: an ecological study. BMC Public Health 20, 404 (2020).

Download citation


  • Paraquat
  • Poisoning
  • Socioeconomic factors
  • Colombia