Skip to main content
Download PDF

Body weight, body composition and energy balance related behaviour during the transition to parenthood: study protocol of a multi-centre observational follow-up study (TRANSPARENTS)

BMC Public Health volume 19, Article number: 516 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The transition to parenthood is a cornerstone event for both parents, potentially leading to relevant changes in lifestyle and behaviour. In women, the metabolic changes during and after pregnancy and the deleterious effects of excessive gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention have been extensively described. However, there is no full understanding about which specific energy balance related behaviours (EBRB) contribute to unfavourable weight gain and weight retention. Furthermore, information on how transition to parenthood affects men is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to investigate changes in body weight, body composition and EBRB in couples transitioning to parenthood.

Methods

TRANSPARENTS is a multi-centre observational follow-up study that focuses on body weight, body composition and EBRB during the transition to parenthood. Couples (women and men) will be recruited during the first trimester of their first pregnancy. Study visits will occur at four occasions (12 weeks of pregnancy, 6 weeks postpartum, 6 months postpartum and 12 months postpartum). Anthropometrics of the parents and new-borns will be assessed including body weight, height/length, body composition (using bio-electrical impedance analysis and measurement of four skinfold thicknesses (biceps, triceps, subscapular and supraspinal/suprailiac)) and waist and hip circumference. Dietary intake, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, smoking habits, sleeping pattern, fatigue, diet and exercise related partner support, mental health, breastfeeding, contraception use, and socio-demographics will be assessed using a questionnaire. In addition, accelerometry will be used to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviour objectively. Also data from women’s medical record, such as pre-pregnancy weight and pregnancy outcomes, will be included. Multilevel modelling will be used to evaluate maternal and paternal changes in body weight, body composition and EBRB during and after pregnancy (primary outcomes). Multiple linear regression analyses will be performed to identify predictors of changes in body weight, body composition and EBRB. All analyses will be adjusted for possible confounders.

Discussion

TRANSPARENTS is a unique project identifying vulnerable parents and (un)favourable changes in EBRB throughout this potentially critical life period. Provided insights will facilitate the development of effective intervention strategies to help couples towards a healthy transition to parenthood.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03454958. Registered March 2018.

Peer Review reports

Background

The worldwide prevalence of overweight and obesity has increased epidemically during the last decennia [1,2,3], with the greatest prevalence being observed in upper-middle-income level regions such as North America and Western Europe [4, 5]. In Belgium, about half of the adult population is overweight or obese [6], and prevalence of maternal obesity in Europe reaches 25% [7]. Predictions show that these trends of weight gain are to be continued throughout the next couple of decades [8, 9]. Overweight and obesity are major risk factors for non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, musculoskeletal disorders, and a number of cancers, and are estimated to account for 3.4 million deaths per year globally [3, 4, 10, 11]. Next to increased mortality rates, co-morbidities attributable to overweight and obesity cause decreased quality of life as well as a large and still growing economic burden [11, 12]. This highlights the urgency to develop effective strategies for the prevention of overweight and obesity.

Although overweight and obesity are caused by a multitude of factors (i.e., genetic, metabolic), the rapid increase in prevalence suggests that, rather than biological changes, behavioural and environmental influences predominate [13]. Weight gain is typically caused by an energy imbalance between energy consumed and energy expended [3]. It is recognised that this imbalance is due to alterations in energy balance related behaviour (EBRB), namely poor eating behaviour characterized by increased intake of energy-dense foods high in fats and free sugars, decreased physical activity levels, and increasing sedentary lifestyles [3].

It has been argued that specific transitional phases during the lifespan, such as living together, marriage, or pregnancy/having a child may have a strong effect on people’s long-term EBRB and body weight [14]. Identification and thorough understanding of critical periods when people are more likely to gain weight or display unhealthy changes in EBRB could help us to develop more effective intervention programs, focusing on that particular stage of life. In this study we will focus on the transition to parenthood, i.e. having a first child.

Research showed that pregnant women are at substantial risk for excessive gestational and postpartum weight gain and retention [15]. Excessive weight gain during pregnancy increases the risk for gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, large-for-gestational age infants etc. [16,17,18,19], whereas higher postpartum weight retention can increase risks in a consecutive pregnancy [20] and lead to lifelong obesity and its related non-communicable diseases [21]. A US study demonstrated that parents gain weight more rapidly than childless women and men [22]. A recent Belgian study showed a mean postnatal weight retention of 3.3 kg, with women retaining up to 16.2 kg of weight six weeks after delivery [23]. Evidence further suggests that increased gestational weight gain (GWG) and postpartum weight retention is more likely for the first pregnancy [20, 24]. A recent review also revealed that pregnancy-related weight gain coheres with increases in fat mass in US women [25].

Increased postpartum body weight is generally caused by a combination of both retention of GWG and alterations in lifestyle due to increased demands related to time, finances, fatigue and child care responsibilities [24, 26, 27]. Healthful EBRBs are associated with reduced risk for excessive GWG [28], and thus, in turn, with reduced risk for excessive postpartum weight retention. Recent reviews [29, 30] emphasize the importance of regular physical activity regarding health during preconception, pregnancy and postpartum. However, parenthood and physical activity are often inversely related [31]. A large prospective study in Australia [32] showed that moderate-to-vigorous physical activity declines during the transition to parenthood in both women and men. Similar results were found in a prospective Canadian study reporting decreases in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity but also in sedentary time, while an increase in light intensity activities was observed [33]. Regarding eating behaviour, most studies seem to focus on pre- and early pregnancy nutrition and its effect on infant outcomes [34]. Although the transition to parenthood may negatively impact healthful eating, studies investigating changes in eating behaviour prospectively are scarce. An Australian study reported no significant changes in diet quality and takeaway-food consumption among women and men having their first child [35]. It should be noted, however, that caloric intake was not studied in this study, so it is not clear whether energy balance was disrupted through excess energy intake. In addition, screening of the literature has taught us that (change in) sedentary behaviour remains understudied during this critical life phase. Although there are some Australian, Canadian and US prospective studies on distinct behaviours, to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies investigating pregnancy-related weight gain from a holistic energy balance perspective, i.e. considering eating, physical activity and sedentary behaviour simultaneously. Besides, Western European research on this topic is lacking. Considering the fact that EBRB is strongly culturally related (e.g. differences in eating or physical activity culture between the US, Australia and Europe), it is important to study changes in body weight, body composition and EBRB along with their determinants among child expecting couples in Western Europe.

Most studies investigating changes in body composition or EBRB during the transition to parenthood focus on women while neglecting their life partners. A recent review [36] revealed that fathers spend less time on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity compared to childless men, especially when they have young children. The same review [36] called for further longitudinal research investigating in detail how the arrival of a child influences physical activity behaviour among fathers. Our review of the available literature revealed that prospective studies investigating body weight and composition, and eating and sedentary behaviour among men transitioning to fatherhood are lacking. Moreover, most weight gain/retention interventions focus on the mother, whereas interventions focusing on the couple while making use of mutual reinforcement, may be more efficacious [33]. Also, if both parents display certain behaviours from early on during the upbringing of their child, it is more likely that children will display similar behaviours during childhood and later life through the principles of parental norms and modelling [37]. Hence, pregnancy should be seen as a window of opportunity to shape healthy EBRB by using a family-centred care approach.

Therefore, the first objective of this study is to investigate both maternal and paternal changes in body weight, body composition and EBRB during the transition to parenthood (i.e. having their first child). A second objective is to investigate socio-demographic and behavioural predictors of changes in both maternal and paternal body weight, body composition and EBRB.

Methods

Study setting

TRANSPARENTS is a multi-centre follow-up study in which four Belgian hospitals are involved: University Hospital of Brussels (UZ Brussel), University Hospital of Leuven (UZ Leuven), Jessa Hospital in Hasselt and Hospital Oost-Limburg in Genk. Every year, around 8650 children are born across the four hospitals, of which approximately 45% are firstborn children. Recruitment as well as baseline measurements will take place in the hospitals. Follow-up measurements will take place in the hospitals or at the participants’ homes, depending on their preferences. The protocol of the study and all related documents were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committees of all the participating hospitals. Written informed consent will be provided by all participants upon entry in the study.

Recruitment of participants and eligibility criteria

Two researchers will be responsible for recruitment of the participants at the obstetric units of the participating hospitals during the intake visit (around the 8th – 12th week of pregnancy). Each researcher will be assigned two hospitals and will be responsible for the recruitment, baseline measurements and follow-up measurements of the participants from the respective hospitals. To optimise recruitment, posters and flyers will be placed in the waiting rooms of the participating hospitals, encouraging potential participants to visit the study website. The flyers will also be handed over by the nurses/midwives of each obstetric unit to couples expecting their first child, and they will be encouraged to fill in a contact sheet when the researcher is not available for informing potential participants. Couples who left their contact details will be contacted by phone or email, depending on their preference, to provide information and ask them to take part in the study.

Only couples expecting their first child (nulliparous women and childless men) can participate in the study. Because of anthropometric and energy balance related differences between men and women (e.g. different dietary habits, differences in physical activity pattern, etc.) [38], we decided not to include lesbian or homosexual couples, as this would result in a heterogenous “partner group” (i.e. consisting of both men and women). Therefore, only male-female couples and only couples of which both parties are eligible and consent to participate will be included in this study. Dutch speaking participants aged 18 year or older, with any body mass index (BMI) and any socio-economic status can participate. Exclusion criteria for participants are the following: unable or unwilling to give informed consent; suffering from a pathological condition that may influence EBRB (e.g. diabetes), having a significant psychiatric disorder, a recent history of bariatric surgery, pregnant through in vitro fertilisation treatment or with requirements for complex medical diets; unable or not allowed to exercise because of medical or other specific reasons (e.g. bed-rest); having a multiple pregnancy (twin, triplet, etc.).

Sample size

For the main outcomes of this study – changes in body weight, body composition and EBRB – a relatively small effect size of 0.15 is anticipated, as this was the minimum effect size observed in a previous study in which changes in body weight and EBRB during another critical life period (transition from secondary to tertiary education) were investigated [39].

With a statistical power of 0.8, significance level (α) of 0.05, and taking into account an estimated maximum attrition rate of 75%, a minimum of 248 participants (= 124 couples) will be recruited. The number of participants to be recruited in each participating obstetrics unit will depend on the number of new-borns in the respective hospitals. Taking into account the relative yearly share of new-borns in each hospital, minimum targets for UZ Brussel, UZ Leuven, Jessa Hospital and Hospital Oost-Limburg are set at 34, 35, 26 and 29 couples respectively. The expected duration to reach the total target of 124 couples is four months.

Timing

Couples will be recruited around week 8–12 of pregnancy. Baseline measurements will take place during the twelfth week of pregnancy. Follow-up measurements will take place at six weeks, six months and one year after delivery (Fig. 1). A range of two to three weeks before or after the theoretic measurement point will be allowed. Baseline measurements will take place in the hospitals before or after the routine pregnancy ultrasound evaluation at week 12 of gestation or during a home visit if this is not possible. Follow-up measurements will take place in the hospitals or at the participants’ homes, depending on their preferences.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Timeline of the TRANSPARENTS observational follow-up study

Full size image

Data collection

Medical record data

Pre-pregnancy weight will be collected from the electronic medical record at inclusion (T0). Complications during pregnancy (e.g. pregnancy diabetes, pre-eclampsia, hypertension), GWG, method of delivery (spontaneous/vaginal, cesarean section) and new-born birthweight will be collected from the electronic medical record after the delivery.

Anthropometrics

Anthropometrics of both parents will be assessed at all four time points (T0-T3) following guidelines of the International Society for the Advancement in Kinanthropometry (ISAK) [40]. Height will be measured using a calibrated SECA wall mounted stadiometer (1 mm accurate scale). Body weight (0.1 kg accurate scale) and body composition (fat mass, fat free mass, muscle mass, bone mass, extra-cellular water, intra-cellular water and organ fat) will be measured using TANITA MC780SMA Bio Impedance Analyzer (BIA). BIA is an inexpensive, rapid, non-invasive and safe method for estimating body composition [25, 41]. BMI will be calculated through dividing body weight (in kg) by squared height (in m). A Harpenden skinfold caliper (0.2 mm accurate scale) will be used to measure skin fold thickness at the biceps, triceps, subscapular and supraspinal sites. Cescorf measuring tape (1 mm accurate scale) will be used to measure waist (at the narrowest part of the waist) and hip circumference (at the largest part of the hip), in order to estimate abdominal and gluteofemoral body fat, respectively. Also new-borns’ anthropometrics will be objectively assessed by the researcher. Therefore, body weight, length, head and upper arm circumferences, and biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac skin folds of the new-born will be measured at T1, T2 and T3. All data will be collected consistently by the same two qualified researchers. Researchers will be trained by a certified ISAK anthropometrist in order to collect data in a standardised way [40]. The training will consist of a theoretical and practical part in which the measurements (incl. landmarks) will be explained and demonstrated. In this training session, the researchers will perform several repeated measurements on the abovementioned body sites on several test subjects under supervision of the certified ISAK trainer. To guarantee reliability between the researchers, a second practical session will be organised to further optimize measurements and minimize inter-rater measurement error.

Questionnaires

Questionnaires will be used to collect prospective data across all time points including self-reported body weight and height and EBRB, consisting of weight control behaviour, dietary intake (22-items Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) [42]), physical activity (IPAQ – Dutch version) [43] and context-specific sedentary behaviour (adapted from Busschaert et al. with pregnancy and child-birth related sedentary behaviours such as ‘sitting while breastfeeding’ [44]). Besides these EBRB related questions, the questionnaire will also include other health related factors (smoking habits, sleeping pattern, fatigue), questions to assess social support from the partner for eating and physical activity behaviour (based on the Social support for diet and Social support for exercise questionnaire [45]; adjusted for partner support and translated (independently by two different researchers and afterwards put together) to Dutch), psychological wellbeing (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Gotland Male Depression Scale (GMDS)), breastfeeding and contraception use (T1-T3), medical conditions and socio-demographics (age, ethnicity, level of education, employment and marital status). The baseline questionnaire (T0) will include additional retrospective questions about pre-pregnancy body weight, changes in EBRB since pregnancy, smoking habits, sleeping pattern and fatigue since pregnancy and nausea during pregnancy (Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis/Nausea (PUQE)). A link to the questionnaire will be sent by email to each participant (men and women separately). Participants who do not complete the questionnaires within one week will be reminded up to three times by email or text message.

Accelerometry

Tri-axial accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+) will be used to measure physical activity and sedentary behaviour objectively over a one-week period. The accelerometers will be programmed on a sampling frequency of 30 Hz and downloaded at an epoch of 60 s. Data processing will be done with Actilife software. Time spent sedentary and in light, moderate and vigorous physical activity will be calculated in minutes using Freedson cut-off points [46]. Accelerometers will be handed over to the participants on the day of the anthropometric assessments. Starting from the next day, participants will be asked to wear the devices from waking up until going to bed for seven consecutive days. Participants will be asked to remove the accelerometer while swimming, showering or bathing, as well as to keep an activity log writing down such non-wearing intervals. The accelerometers should be returned per pre-franked post package, which the participants receive together with the accelerometers. A detailed overview of the above measurements, methods and time points is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Overview of measurements and used methods
Full size table

Outcomes

The primary aim of the study is to evaluate maternal and paternal changes in body weight, body composition and EBRB during and after pregnancy up to one year after delivery. Therefore, the primary outcomes are changes in body weight, BMI, body composition (fat mass, fat free mass, muscle mass, bone mass, extra-cellular water, intra-cellular water and organ fat), dietary intake, physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Secondary outcomes are socio-demographics, breastfeeding, partner support for diet and exercise behaviour, psychological wellbeing and new-borns’ anthropometrics.

Data management

An electronic software program (RedCap software) will be used to enter and store data from the medical records, anthropometrics, and questionnaires.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses will be performed in SPSS 25.0 and R (RStudio version 1.1.383). Prior to the statistical analyses, all data will be screened for outliers and data cleaning will be performed when necessary. Descriptive statistics of the sample will be calculated and drop-out analysis will be conducted, using independent samples t-tests for quantitative data and chi2 for qualitative data. Multilevel modelling will be performed to evaluate changes in body weight, body composition and EBRB over time according to gender. Multilevel modelling is particularly well fitted to analyse repeated measures over time in a hierarchical structure (i.e. individuals clustered within couples and clustered within hospitals) including missing values (which are anticipated to be present due to the wide range of variables at different time points we aim to measure) [47]. Multiple linear regression analyses will be performed to identify predictors of changes in body weight, body composition and EBRB. All analyses will be adjusted for possible confounders. P-values < 0.05 will be considered as statistically significant.

Discussion

The transition to parenthood is hypothesized to be a critical period in life where changes in body weight and EBRB are likely to occur. Unhealthy changes in EBRB, excessive weight gain during pregnancy, and weight retention after delivery may lead to long-term weight retention. In turn, this may lead to increased prevalence of overweight and obesity, which are major risk factors for non-communicable diseases. Moreover, women showing excessive weight gain during pregnancy are at increased risk for pregnancy- and child-related complications [16,17,18,19, 48]. Hence, it is important to unravel these mechanisms causing excessive weight gain throughout this life event, which may all interrelate and have an impact on weight gain and retention during the transition to parenthood. TRANSPARENTS is an innovative study investigating changes in body weight, body composition and EBRB during the transition to parenthood from a holistic point of view. Moreover this research will not only focus on women, but also on their male partners. The combination of investigating changes in body weight and body composition, in association with changes in EBRB, of both women and men transitioning to parenthood will provide understanding about this life phase and those most at risk for excessive weight retention. This knowledge will help us to develop family-based interventions targeting excessive weight gain and unfavourable changes in EBRB among couples having their first child. As lifestyle interventions focusing only on health behaviour generally show moderate effects, adding the aspect of partner support might be an important asset for extra encouragement to change towards, and even more importantly, maintain healthy behaviours [49, 50].

A first strength of this study is the longitudinal follow-up design, since research on EBRB before, during or after pregnancy is mainly based on cross-sectional designs [31]. A second strength is the abovementioned holistic approach of EBRB (i.e. combining eating, physical activity and sedentary behaviour) in relation to changes in body weight and body composition. Furthermore, also partner support and psychological health are taken into account. Third, the majority of studies on this topic have focused on women while leaving men ignored [31]. Hence, studies including both women and men transitioning to parenthood are needed to enhance the knowledge on this critical period in life. Fourth, the use of objective measurements of anthropometrics, physical activity and sedentary behaviour can be considered an important strength as they increase accuracy and reduce measurement error compared to subjective measurements. Unfortunately, no objective measurements, that can be used on a large scale, exist to assess dietary intake. Finally, the multi-centre approach (i.e. recruitment at four participating hospitals across two provinces in Flanders and the Brussels Capital Region (Belgium)) can be considered an important strength of this study.

A first limitation of this study is the retrospective collection of pre-pregnancy data (as of course, it is impossible to know when people are getting pregnant). Second, because of feasibility reasons we chose not to include a control group (couples not expecting a child), as we would need matched couples who are in the same life phase (except for pregnancy) and do not have children nor a wish for children during the upcoming study period. Finally, due to the recruitment of volunteers we may expect a selection bias, as studies investigating health behaviour generally end up with a healthier, but also higher educated study sample compared to the general population [51].

The TRANSPARENTS study is the first European study investigating changes in EBRB during and after pregnancy up to one year after delivery, and its role in excessive GWG and postpartum weight retention taking into account both women and men. Provided insights from the TRANSPARENTS study will facilitate the development of effective intervention strategies to counter excessive weight gain and retention among couples transitioning to parenthood.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

EBRB:

Energy balance related behaviour

EPDS:

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

FFQ:

Food frequency questionnaire

GMDS:

Gotland Male Depression Scale

GWG:

Gestational weight gain

IPAQ:

International Physical Activity Questionnaire

PUQE:

Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis/Nausea

References

  1. von Ruesten A, Steffen A, Floegel A, van der AD, Masala G, Tjonneland A, et al. Trend in obesity prevalence in European adult cohort populations during follow-up since 1996 and their predictions to 2015. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. Jama. 2012;307(5):491–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. WHO. Obesity and overweight: World Health Organisation; 2016. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/. Accessed 2018.

  4. WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. World Health Organisation. 2014. http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/. Accessed 2018.

  5. Eurostat. Overweight and obesity - BMI statistics. 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Overweight_and_obesity_-_BMI_statistics. Accessed 2018.

  6. Drieskens S. Voedingsstatus. In: Gisle L, Demarest S, editors. Gezondheidsenquête 2013. Rapport 2: Gezondheidsgedrag en leefstijl. Brussel: WIV-ISP; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Devlieger R, Benhalima K, Damm P, Van Assche A, Mathieu C, Mahmood T, et al. Maternal obesity in Europe: where do we stand and how to move forward?: a scientific paper commissioned by the European board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;201:203–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Liang L, Caballero B, Kumanyika SK. Will all Americans become overweight or obese? Estimating the progression and cost of the US obesity epidemic. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(10):2323–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanchez-Romero LM, Pineda E, Brown M, Jaccard A, McPherson K, Webber L. Forecasting/projecting adulthood obesity in 53 WHO EU region countries (unpublished report). World Health Organisation; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH. The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dixon JB. The effect of obesity on health outcomes. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;316(2):104–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):815–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malnick SD, Knobler H. The medical complications of obesity. QJM. 2006;99(9):565–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Engberg E, Alen M, Kukkonen-Harjula K, Peltonen JE, Tikkanen HO, Pekkarinen H. Life events and change in leisure time physical activity: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2012;42(5):433–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O'Brien CM, Grivell RM, Dodd JM. Systematic review of antenatal dietary and lifestyle interventions in women with a normal body mass index. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(3):259–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Catalano PM, Ehrenberg HM. The short- and long-term implications of maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring. Bjog. 2006;113(10):1126–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chu SY, Callaghan WM, Kim SY, Schmid CH, Lau J, England LJ, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):2070–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Gurung T, Smith WC, Bhattacharya S. Obesity as an independent risk factor for elective and emergency caesarean delivery in nulliparous women--systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Obes Rev. 2009;10(1):28–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Poston L, Caleyachetty R, Cnattingius S, Corvalan C, Uauy R, Herring S, et al. Preconceptional and maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(12):1025–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bogaerts A, Van den Bergh BR, Ameye L, Witters I, Martens E, Timmerman D, et al. Interpregnancy weight change and risk for adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):999–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gillman MW. Gestational weight gain: now and the future. Circulation. 2012;125(11):1339–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Umberson D, Liu H, Mirowsky J, Reczek C. Parenthood and trajectories of change in body weight over the life course. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2011;73(9):1323–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bogaerts A, De Baetselier E, Ameye L, Dilles T, Van Rompaey B, Devlieger R. Postpartum weight trajectories in overweight and lean women. Midwifery. 2017;49(Supplement C):134–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gunderson EP, Abrams B. Epidemiology of gestational weight gain and body weight changes after pregnancy. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(2):261–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Widen EM, Gallagher D. Body composition changes in pregnancy: measurement, predictors and outcomes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(6):643–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bassett-Gunter RL, Levy-Milne R, Naylor PJ, Symons Downs D, Benoit C, Warburton DE, et al. Oh baby! Motivation for healthy eating during parenthood transitions: a longitudinal examination with a theory of planned behavior perspective. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Olson CM, Strawderman MS, Hinton PS, Pearson TA. Gestational weight gain and postpartum behaviors associated with weight change from early pregnancy to 1 y postpartum. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(1):117–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stuebe AM, Oken E, Gillman MW. Associations of diet and physical activity during pregnancy with risk for excessive gestational weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):58 e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harrison CL, Brown WJ, Hayman M, Moran LJ, Redman LM. The role of physical activity in preconception, pregnancy and postpartum health. Semin Reprod Med. 2016;34(2):e28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Evenson KR, Mottola MF, Owe KM, Rousham EK, Brown WJ. Summary of international guidelines for physical activity after pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69(7):407–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bellows-Riecken KH, Rhodes RE. A birth of inactivity? A review of physical activity and parenthood. Prev Med. 2008;46(2):99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perales F, del Pozo-Cruz J, del Pozo-Cruz B. Long-term dynamics in physical activity behaviour across the transition to parenthood. Int J Public Health. 2015;60(3):301–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rhodes RE, Blanchard CM, Benoit C, Levy-Milne R, Naylor PJ, Symons Downs D, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behavior across 12 months in cohort samples of couples without children, expecting their first child, and expecting their second child. J Behav Med. 2014;37(3):533–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramakrishnan U, Grant F, Goldenberg T, Zongrone A, Martorell R. Effect of Women's nutrition before and during early pregnancy on maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26:285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith KJ, McNaughton SA, Gall SL, Otahal P, Dwyer T, Venn AJ. Associations between partnering and parenting transitions and dietary habits in young adults. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017.

  36. Pot N, Keizer R. Physical activity and sport participation: a systematic review of the impact of fatherhood. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:121–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. te Velde SJ, ChinAPaw MJ, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Bere E, Maes L, Moreno L, et al. Parents and friends both matter: simultaneous and interactive influences of parents and friends on European schoolchildren’s energy balance-related behaviours – the ENERGY cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1):82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu BN, O'Sullivan AJ. Sex differences in energy metabolism need to be considered with lifestyle modifications in humans. J Nutr Metab. 2011;2011.

  39. Deforche B, Van Dyck D, Deliens T, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Changes in weight, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary intake during the transition to higher education: a prospective study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Marfell-Jones MJ, Stewart A, De Ridder J. International standards for anthropometric assessment 2012.

  41. TANITA. Frequently Asked Questions - Can anybody use a body fat monitor? https://tanita.eu/help-guides/f-a-q. Accessed 2018.

  42. Matthys C, Meulemans A, Van Der Schueren B. Development and validation of general FFQ for use in clinical practice. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;67(suppl.1):239.

  43. Matton L, Wijndaele K, Duvigneaud N, Duquet W, Philippaerts R, Thomis M, et al. Reliability and validity of the Flemish physical activity computerized questionnaire in adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007;78(4):293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Busschaert C, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Holle V, Chastin SF, Cardon G, De Cocker K. Reliability and validity of three questionnaires measuring context-specific sedentary behaviour and associated correlates in adolescents, adults and older adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med. 1987;16(6):825–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Field A, Miles J, Field Z. Discovering statistics using R: sage publications; 2012.

  48. Bogaerts A, Van den Bergh B, Nuyts E, Martens E, Witters I, Devlieger R. Socio-demographic and obstetrical correlates of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain. Clin Obes. 2012;2(5–6):150–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hanson M, Barker M, Dodd JM, Kumanyika S, Norris S, Steegers E, et al. Interventions to prevent maternal obesity before conception, during pregnancy, and post partum. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(1):65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Choi J, Fukuoka Y, Lee JH. The effects of physical activity and physical activity plus diet interventions on body weight in overweight or obese women who are pregnant or in postpartum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Prev Med. 2013;56(6):351–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Regber S, Novak M, Eiben G, Lissner L, Hense S, Sandstrom TZ, et al. Assessment of selection bias in a health survey of children and families - the IDEFICS Sweden-study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study is funded by the Research Foundation – Flanders (‘Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek’ (FWO)). The project was evaluated by the FWO Health Sciences expert panel. Project number FWO: G033418 N. R.D. is holder of a Fundamental Clinical Investigatorship 1803311 N. Contact information: Egmontstraat 5, 1000 Brussel. Telephone: + 32 2 512 91 10. Email: post@fwo.be. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing the report and decision to submit the report for publication, and will not have ultimate authority over any of these activities.

Availability of data and materials

Data can be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Tom Deliens, Vickà Versele, Hannelore Vanden Eynde, Peter Clarys & Dirk Aerenhouts

  2. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Vickà Versele, Hannelore Vanden Eynde, Roland Devlieger & Annick Bogaerts

  3. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Roland Devlieger

  4. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium

    Annick Bogaerts

  5. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium

    Leonardo Gucciardo

  6. Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium

    Leonardo Gucciardo

  7. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium

    Annick Schreurs

  8. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600, Genk, Belgium

    Caroline Van Holsbeke

Authors
  1. Tom Deliens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vickà Versele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hannelore Vanden Eynde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Clarys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roland Devlieger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Annick Bogaerts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Leonardo Gucciardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Annick Schreurs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Caroline Van Holsbeke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dirk Aerenhouts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TD and DA conceived and designed the study and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. VV contributed to the design and writing of the manuscript. HVE, PC, RD, AB, LG, AS and CVH contributed to the design of the study and revised the manuscript critically. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Deliens.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial will be conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (current version), the principles of good clinical practice (GCP) and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. The protocol and related documents were submitted for review and approved by the leading Medical Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium) on May 16th 2018 (B.U.N. 143201835875). This approval includes the advices of the non-leading Medical Ethics Committees of the participating hospitals, i.e. UZ Leuven (KULeuven), Jessa Ziekenhuis Hasselt and Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk. In addition, an amendment of the protocol was submitted for review and approved by the same leading Medical Ethics Committee on October 29th 2018. Any other amendments will be communicated with the leading Medical Ethics Committee. The study can and will be conducted only on the basis of prior written informed consent by the subjects to participate in the study. All data will be coded, the subjects’ names or other identifiers will be stored separately from the research data and replaced by unique codes to create new identities for each individual subject. Only researchers involved in the study will have access to the data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deliens, T., Versele, V., Vanden Eynde, H. et al. Body weight, body composition and energy balance related behaviour during the transition to parenthood: study protocol of a multi-centre observational follow-up study (TRANSPARENTS). BMC Public Health 19, 516 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6884-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6884-0

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us