Skip to main content

Feelings about the timing of first sexual intercourse and health-related quality of life among adolescents



Early sexual intercourse (SI) may have long-lasting negative impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). So far, these impacts have been studied using age for defining early SI instead of feelings about its timing. The present study examined the association between feelings about the timing of first SI and current HRQoL.


Data came from the 2014 cross-sectional Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study in French-speaking Belgium. Among participants aged 16–20 years who already had SI, 1778 were included in analyses. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed, including potential confounders.


One quarter of adolescents (26.4%) had poor HRQoL, 19.8% expressed a negative feeling about the timing of first SI and 19.6% did not think about it. Compared with adolescents who thought first SI happened at the right time or wished it had happened sooner, adolescents who had a negative feeling about the timing and those who did not think about it were more likely to have a poor HRQoL (cOR = 1.67 (1.28–2.17) and cOR = 1.37 (1.05–1.80), respectively). After adjustment, associations were no more significant (aOR = 1.22 (0.91–1.63) and aOR = 1.22 (0.91–1.64)). Sex disparity in expressing a negative feeling mostly explained the difference between crude and adjusted analyses.


Further research is needed to better understand such a complex relationship. The high proportion of adolescents having poor HRQoL and negative feeling about the timing of first SI shows how important it is to find out effective prevention for both domains.

Peer Review reports


Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a multidimensional concept covering “physical, emotional, mental, social and behavioural components of well-being”, as perceived by children and adolescents [1]. Adolescence is a pivotal and critical period of the life span; it is marked by the onset of puberty and characterized by the development of identity and emotions [2]. Adolescents become physically and sexually mature and may need time to accept these changes. Besides those internal changes, social environment may also influence their behaviours. Adolescents may feel pressure to engage in risky behaviors, such as too early sexual intercourse (SI) that may have adverse physical and psychological consequences [2].

First SI, which involves mind and feelings [3], usually occurs in a loving relationship [4, 5]. Different studies have highlighted an association between early sexual initiation and psychological consequences [6,7,8]. Early sexual initiation may be associated with sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which could be explained by biological factors such as immature cervix [9, 10] and non-contraceptive use [4, 11], the latter also being associated with unintended pregnancy [4]. In turn, all these outcomes might have an impact on well-being [3, 12, 13], a component of the HRQoL. However, previous studies have addressed early sexual initiation based on the legal age of consent [6], i.e. the age above which someone is considered to be legally comptent to consent to a sexual act, or on associated risks [7, 8], rather than on individual perception or feelings.

Adolescents may express regrets about the timing of first SI, especially when it was triggered by pressure from friends or the partner [14, 15], or by sexual arousal [14]. Feeling that first SI happened too early or too late may have psychological consequences [14] including poor HRQoL.

Even if negative feelings are more frequent among adolescents who had first SI at a young age [16, 17], negative feelings are present at each age in proportions ranging from 29.1 to 55.0% according to the previous studies [15,16,17,18,19]. Furthermore, level of suitability of the relationship, level of preparedness, planning and willingness may be factors contributing to later regret [20].

The aim of this study was to describe the association between feelings about the timing of first SI and current HRQoL among 16–20 year old adolescents in French-speaking Belgium in 2014. Our hypothesis was that having a poor HRQoL was associated with feeling that first SI had happened too early.


Study design

The “Health Behaviour in School-aged Children” (HBSC) survey is a cross-sectional study conducted every 4 years in around 40 countries and regions under the aegis of the WHO Regional Office for Europe [21].

This study was carried out in the French-speaking part of Belgium among students from the fifth grade of elementary school (10 years of age) to the last grade of secondary school in 2014 (18–19 years in most situations). Questionnaires were self-administrated in the classroom under school-staff surveillance. Anonymity and data’s confidentiality were guaranteed [21]. Given the topics and the methods used for data collection, the protocol has not been submitted to an ethical committee but to the school authorities which allowed to carry out the survey.


The survey was conducted on a random sample stratified proportionally to the school population distribution by province (n = 6) and school network (public and private) [21]. First, schools were randomly drawn; secondly, classes were randomly selected in each grade among schools which agreed to participate in the study. All pupils of selected classes were included in the sample [21].

In 2014, 394 secondary schools were invited to participate in the study. Among the schools that responded to the invitation (n = 193), 72 participated in the survey, which corresponds to a participation rate of 37.3% among respondents [21]. A total of 4985 questionnaires were collected for the students from the fourth to the sixth-seventh grades of secondary school. The number of students eligible in 2014 was 2251 (Fig. 1). Almost eight students out of ten fulfilled the eligible criteria and did not have missing data; thereby 1778 participants were included in analyses (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Inclusion diagram for students from 4th to 6th–7th grade in French-speaking Belgium, HBSC, 2014


Feeling about the timing of first SI

This topic was explored with the question: “after your first sexual intercourse, did you think: (1) I wished it had happened sooner; (2) it happened at the right time; (3) I wished it had happened later; (4) I did not really want it to happen; (5) I did not think about it”. Due to small sample sizes and the closed meaning of categories, the grouping was as follows: negative feeling was represented by propositions (3) + (4), neutral feeling by (5) and reference category by (1) + (2). The intention of this question was to measure “full sexual intercourse” but other interpretation as a sexual practice could not be excluded.


The KIDSCREEN-10 was developed from the KIDSCREEN-27 and consists of a 10-item questionnaire [1]. Its reliability and validity as an independent instrument have been demonstrated [22]. The T value threshold of the HRQoL was set at 38, which corresponds to the 15th percentile of the distribution in the European reference population of teenagers aged from 12 to 18 years. All respondents with a T value lower than this threshold were considered as having a low HRQoL; this means that they “felt unhappy, incapable and dissatisfied with their family life, their relationships with peers and their lives in school” [1].

Perceived social support

The family and friend subscales are subjective social support instruments whose validity and reliability have been demonstrated [23]. The threshold values of the family and friend subscales were respectively set at 5.75 and 6.00, corresponding to the median of the score distribution in the whole sample. All the participants in the sample with a lower score than the threshold were considered as having a low social support [24].

Migration status

Adolescents born in Belgium with both parents born in Belgium were considered as natives. They were considered as second-generation migrants when they were born in Belgium while not both of their parents were born in Belgium. When neither the adolescents nor the two parents were born in Belgium, they were considered as adolescents of the first-generation. Adolescents who were born abroad but who had both parents born in Belgium were also considered as natives.


The Family Affluence Scale (FAS) is a measure of family wealth used in adolescent surveys. The FAS is composed of six items and has been validated in Europe [25]. The FAS ranged from 0 to 13 and was divided into three categories - low, medium and high - corresponding respectively to scores 6 or below, between 7 and 9, 10 or higher.

In addition, age, sex, family structure, school orientation, daily smoking, drunkenness during life and cannabis experience were asked to the students.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed for students aged from 16 to 20 years from 4th grade to 6th–7th grade of secondary school who had had first SI and for whom all values in all variables of interest were available. Cramer’s V was used to assess the correlation between each independent variable.

Proportions of low HRQoL are reported for each category of variables. Comparisons of the proportions were carried out using the Pearson’s chi-squared test and Cochran-Armitage test for trend when appropriate. Univariate logistic regressions were performed between the dependent variable HRQoL and each variable of interest. Each explanatory variable was tested as confounding or effect modifier factor in bivariate analyses by the Mantel-Haenszel test of homogeneity with a threshold set at 0.05.

Using multivariate logistic regressions, association between feelings about the timing of first SI and a low HRQoL was assessed, accounting for all variables related to the HRQoL with a P value lower than 0.20 in univariate analyses to take into account potential confounding factors. A backward stepwise selection was used to determine the main model, which consisted in iteratively removing the least useful predictor that has a P value higher than 0.05. When removing a variable, confounding was assessed by checking the changes in the odds ratios (a tolerated variation was set at 10%) or drastic changes in the significance level for the remaining variables. Collinearity, fitting and specification of models were verified. Due to collinearity between drunkenness, daily smoking and cannabis experience, combining the three within a score was attempted but showed no significant association with HRQoL. Since drunkenness and cannabis experience were not individually associated with HRQoL, only daily smoking, that was associated with HRQoL in univariate analysis with a p-value < 0.20 (p = 0.18), was finally used in analyses.The threshold of statistical significance for all tests performed was set at 0.05.

Subsequently, to address the intermediate role of the context of first SI, variables related to that context were included in the main model by using a forward stepwise selection. Variables included dichotomized age at first SI (threshold set at 14 years old due to collinearity for other ages), contraceptive use at first SI (condom, pill, morning-after pill or another method) age difference with the partner and number of SI. Confounders and effect modifiers were assessed. Out of the 1778 participants of the main model, there was 4.8% missing data related to the context of first SI. Therefore, this subsequent multivariate model was performed on 1659 participants.

All analyses were performed using Stata/IC 12®.


Participant characteristics

One quarter (26.4%) of adolescents had a low HRQoL, 19.8% reported a negative feeling about the timing of their first SI and 19.6% reported a neutral feeling (Table 1).

Table 1 Health behavior, and socio-demographic characteristics of the 16–20 year-old subjects. HBSC, French-speaking Belgium, 2014 (n = 1778)

Characteristics associated with low HRQoL

The timing of first SI was significantly associated with low HRQoL in univariate logistic regression (Table 2). Compared with adolescents in the reference category, adolescents who reported a negative feeling were more likely to have a low HRQoL (crude OR (cOR) = 1.67 (1.28–2.17)). This was also the case for those who reported a neutral feeling (cOR = 1.37 (1.05–1.80)). Sex, FAS, family structure, body image and perceived social support were significantly associated with a low HRQoL and therefore included in the initial multivariate model. Indeed, girls; adolescents with a low or medium FAS; from blended, single-parent or other family structures; declaring a “too thin”, “fat” or “too fat” body image; and having a low friend or family support were more likely to have a low HRQoL. Due to its P value lower than 0.20 in univariate analyses, smoking was also selected in multivariate analyses (Table 2).

Table 2 Univariate logistic regression for a low health-related quality of lifea. HBSC, French-speaking Belgium, 2014 (n = 1778)

In the multivariate logistic regression, association between feelings about the timing of first SI and low HRQoL was no longer significant (Table 3). To find out what could explain such a change, all covariates were tested as potential confounding factors. Sex caused a variation of 14.4% from 1.42 (CI 95% 1.07–1.89) to 1.22 (CI 95% 0.91–1.63) of the odds of low HRQoL in the group of adolescents who reported a negative feeling. Nevertheless, sex had a slight impact in the group of adolescents who reported a neutral feeling. Family affluence scale, family structure, body image, perceived social support were still significantly associated with a low HRQoL in the multivariate logistic regressions. Indeed, girls; adolescents with a low FAS; from blended or other family structures; declaring a “too thin”, “fat” or “too fat” body image; and having a low friend or family support had higher odds of low HRQoL (Table 3). These covariates involved variations lower than 10%. No significant interaction was found and the sex stratified analysis did not provide any additional information.

Table 3 Multivariatea logistic regression for low health-related quality of lifeb. HBSC, French-speaking Belgium, 2014 (n = 1778)

Potential intermediate role of the context of the first SI

The mean age at first SI was 15.6 (± 1.4) years, and 6.9% of adolescents had first SI before 14 years. Half (54.6%) had had their first SI with an older partner whereas 15.2% had it with a younger partner. Almost all used a contraceptive method (94.6%) and had subsequent SI (91.5%) (data not tabulated).

In the univariate logistic regression, only the number of SI was not associated with low HRQoL (P value > 0,20). Age difference with the partner (compared to same-age partner, younger partner: cOR = 0.98 (0.68–1.41), older partner: cOR = 1.44 (1.12–1.86)) and absence of contraceptive use (cOR = 1.73 (1.11–2.69)) were significantly associated with a low HRQoL (P value < 0,05) whereas age at first SI (cOR = 1.38 (0.91–2.09)) was not significantly associated with low HRQoL (P value =0,13).

In multivariate logistic regression, only the association between contraceptive use and low HRQoL was statistically significant (Additional File 1). Compared with the last main model, the contraceptive use changed the odds ratios of the feelings about the timing of first SI to 1.13 (95% CI 0.83–1.53, 7.4% of variation) for adolescents who reported a negative feeling, and to 1.21 (95% CI 0.89–1.66, 0.8% of variation) for adolescents who reported a neutral feeling.


Feelings about the timing of first SI was associated with HRQoL in univariate analyses: adolescents having a negative feeling of their first SI were more likely to have poor HRQoL than their peers wishing their first SI had happened sooner or was at the right time. However, this association disappeared in multivariate analyses, partly due to the differential distribution between sex and feelings (72.4% of girls reported negative feelings, compared with only 27.6% of boys). We also observed that HRQoL determinants like FAS and body image reduced the strength of the association between adolescents who reported a neutral feeling and poor HRQoL in multivariate analyses.

Referring to the definition of HRQoL [1, 26], HRQoL cannot be substituted for well-being. However, given the lack of literature on this topic, part of the discussion will be mainly oriented towards well-being.

The multidimensionality of well-being which contributes in HRQoL [1] and integrates “biological, psychological, social and spiritual dimensions” [27] could partly explain that feelings about the timing of first SI was not associated with HRQoL in multivariate analyses. It has been shown that the timing of first SI could have an impact on subsequent self-confidence as a competent sexual partner, which in turns had an impact on sexual well-being [28]. Sexual well-being can be measured by several indicators [29] derived from the WHO’s definition of sexual health that states it is “a state of physical, mental and social well-being in relation to sexuality” [30]. Thus, even if sexual well-being can be defined using the same dimensions as overall well-being, sexual well-being only represents one aspect of overall well-being and therefore of the HRQoL. Nevertheless, sexual well-being could not be evaluated in the context of our study. In addition, desire, willingness, and peer or partner pressure were not explored in our study, although they are major components of the context surrounding first SI [20, 29]. Another reason that could explain why association between feelings about the timing of first SI and HRQoL could not be demonstrated in multivariate analyses, lies in the wording used to express these feelings. It had been shown that regrets, regardless of the domain, are associated with poor subjective well-being [31]. In our questionnaire, we used a preference statement, expressing timing as “too early”, “too late” or “appropriate”, instead of a strong statement expressing regrets about the timing.

In view of the results obtained in the multivariate analysis, sex was identified as confounding factor. Sex disparity regarding the feelings about the timing of first SI can be explained by a greater degree of interpersonal sensitivity for girls than for boys. Girls tend to be more psychologically and emotionally involved in their interpersonal success about relationships [32] and hence may be more affected when they have relationship problems. Girls tend to idealize their first SI both at the setting and emotional level and hence to have negative feelings when it does not correspond to their expectations [33]. They also tend to feel more guilty about the first SI, especially when the first sexual relationship ends [33], leading to feeling of regret regarding the intercourse [13]. Girls are also more likely to engage in first SI because they want more intimacy and a stronger relationship [3, 34]. Meanwhile, boys are more likely to look for sexual pleasure [3] and to consider this act as an achievement [35]. In relation to their anatomy and to higher non-coital experience, males are more likely to have an orgasm and then a “physical gratification” during first SI [33]. On their side, girls can be physically affected by an unintended pregnancy and are at higher risk of contracting STI, due to a more favorable environment for penetration and growing of bacteria [36], that can induce psychological effects [13].

When subsenquently analyzing the circumstances in which the first SI occured, it appeared that adolescents who did not use contraception at first SI were more likely to have a poor HRQoL, even after adjusting for other covariates. This may be explained by the fact that they realized they took risks regarding STI or unplanned pregnancy [4], which may have an impact on well-being [12, 13]. Such risks and consequences on well-being could be different according to the contraceptive method. However, given that methods were highly correlated between each other (data not shown), using specific methods in the same modelling was not interpretable.

To our knowledge, this is the first study that investigates the association between feelings about the timing of first SI and HRQoL, hence comparison with other studies are limited. However, we observed in our study that the proportion of adolescents who reported a negative feeling was lower than the proportions documented in other studies [16,17,18,19]. In these studies, adolescents were asked to express what they thought about the timing of first SI at the time of the survey, whereas in our study we asked what they thought at the time of first SI. For instance, a cohort study presented by Sawyer and Smith in 1996 showed that proportion of students regretting their first SI were higher at a later time than immediately after it occurred [37].

Our study revealed that there was no significant association between feelings about the timing of first SI and HRQoL, partly due to the sex role. Indeed, in the multivariate analysis, the association became significant only when sex was removed from the model. This confounding situation is probably due to the fact that more girls than boys reported a low HRQoL on one hand, and a negative feeling on the other hand.

In our study, we evaluated the statistical association between feelings about the timing of first SI and HRQoL, instead of the causal relationship which would have rather required a prospective cohort design. Beyond to fulfill the descriptive purpose of the HBSC surveys [38], the cross-sectional design and a self-administrated questionnaire however made easier to include a large sample size and to reach a reliable precision in our estimations. The questionnaire was administrated during school hours, under the school-staff surveillance, including teachers. That condition could have induced biased results but they can be considered as limited. Indeed, instruction was given to ensure the confidentiality and anonymity of students’ answers by creating conditions of the type “examination” and by avoiding walking in the classroom.

Questions related to sexuality are considered as a sensitive topic and are subject to higher nonresponse rates and to higher measurement errors due to the social desirability [39]. If the social desirability bias was non-differential (i.e. adolescents underreported negative feelings in the same extent among those with a low HRQoL and among those with a high HRQoL), the association between feelings about the timing of first SI and HRQoL would tend toward the null.

Association between feelings about the timing of first SI and HRQoL might also have been underestimated because of selection bias. Indeed, the sex, migration status, friend support subscale, FAS and body image had a significant different distribution among the included participants and among the eligible who were not included due to missing data (data not shown). In addition, included participants had a higher HRQoL score than eligible participants not included in the analyses; low HRQoL was therefore probably underestimated and its association with feelings about the timing of first SI was then more likely to be underestimated.

Another limitation of this study was that the KIDSCREEN-10 was developed for the 8–18 years old children and adolescents whereas our study concerned adolescents from 16 to 20 years old. However, our findings are consistent with previous studies in that well-known determinants are associated with HRQoL in our study: for instance, adolescents in the group of low and medium FAS were more likely to have low HRQoL, compared with adolescents in the group of high FAS [22, 40]; girls were more likely than boys to have low HRQoL [1, 22].


Further research is needed to confirm the lack of association due to sex between feelings about the timing of first SI and HRQoL, including for example sexual orientation, feeling of love, willingness or desire. These studies are necessary in order to effectively improve adolescent HRQoL and may help tailor the programs for health professionals, adolescents and their families. It is nevertheless already essential to find out adapted and effective preventive actions regarding negative feelings about the timing of first SI given the proportion observed. There is a need to support adolescents to develop control skills which might help to reduce these negative feelings. Since such feelings are more frequent among girls, focusing studies on girls without neglecting boys at risk, seems important.


95% CI:

95% Confidence interval


Family Affluence Scale


Health Behaviour in School-aged Children


Health-Related Quality of Life


Odds ratio


Sexually transmitted infections


World Health Organization


  1. 1.

    The Kidscreen Group Europe. The KIDSCREEN questionnaires: quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers; 2006.

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization (WHO). Adolescent development: WHO. World health organization; 2011. [cited 2017 Apr 13]

  3. 3.

    Lickona T. The neglected heart: the emotional dangers of premature sexual involvement. Am Educ. 1994;18:34–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Boislard MA, van de Bongardt D, Blais M. Sexuality (and lack thereof) in adolescence and early adulthood: a review of the literature. Behav Sci. 2016;6:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hawes ZC, Wellings K, Stephenson J. First heterosexual intercourse in the United Kingdom: a review of the literature. J Sex Res. 2010;47:137–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Stuart-Smith S. Teenage sex. BMJ. 1996;312:390.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kuzman M, Simetin IP, Franelić IP. Early sexual intercourse and risk factors in Croatian adolescents. Coll Antropol. 2007;31(Suppl 2):121–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Madkour AS, Farhat T, Halpern CT, Godeau E, Gabhainn SN. Early adolescent sexual initiation and physical/psychological symptoms: a comparative analysis of five nations. J Youth Adolesc. 2010;39:1211–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dellar RC, Dlamini S, Karim QA. Adolescent girls and young women: key populations for HIV epidemic control. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18:19408.

  10. 10.

    Kahn JA, Rosenthal SL, Succop PA, Ho GYF, Burk RD. Mediators of the association between age of first sexual intercourse and subsequent human papillomavirus infection. Pediatrics. 2002;109:E5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Osorio A, Lopez-del Burgo C, Carlos S, de Irala J. The sooner, the worse? Association between earlier age of sexual initiation and worse adolescent health and well-being outcomes. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1298.

  12. 12.

    Gipson JD, Koenig MA, Hindin MJ. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plan. 2008;39:18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Meier AM. Adolescent first sex and subsequent mental health. Am J Sociol. 2007;112:1811–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Osorio A, López-Del Burgo C, Carlos S, Ruiz-Canela M, Delgado M, De Irala J. First sexual intercourse and subsequent regret in three developing countries. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50:271–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wight D, Henderson M, Raab G, Abraham C, Buston K, Scott S, et al. Extent of regretted sexual intercourse among young teenagers in Scotland: a cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1243–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dickson N, Paul C, Herbison P, Silva P. First sexual intercourse: age, coercion, and later regrets reported by birth cohort. BMJ. 1998;316:29–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wight D, Parkes A, Strange V, Allen E, Bonell C, Henderson M. The quality of young people’s heterosexual relationships: a longitudinal analysis of characteristics shaping subjective experience. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40:226–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Albert B. With One Voice 2012: America’s Adults and Teens sound Off About Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. 2012. ISBN 1-58671-081-8.

  19. 19.

    Martino SC, Collins RL, Elliott MN, Kanouse DE, Berry SH. It’s better on TV: does television set teenagers up for regret following sexual initiation? Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;41:92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Layte R, McGee H. Regret about the timing of first sexual intercourse: the role of age and context. Dublin: the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI); 2007. Working paper, No 217

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Service d’information Promotion Education Santé (SIPES). HBSC survey in French-speaking Belgium - Preliminary results 2014: Fact sheet; 2014. [cited 2017 Mar 15]

  22. 22.

    Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Rajmil L, Herdman M, Auquier P, Bruil J, et al. Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:1487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dahlem NW, Zimet GD, Walker RR. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support: a confirmation study. J Clin Psychol. 1991;47:756–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GKG, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, et al. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52:30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Torsheim T, Cavallo F, Levin KA, Schnohr C, Mazur J, Niclasen B, et al. Psychometric validation of the revised family affluence scale: a latent variable approach. Child Indic Res. 2016;9:771–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:645–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Moreira PAS, Robert Cloninger C, Dinis L, Sá L, Oliveira JT, Dias A, et al. Personality and well-being in adolescents. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Reissing ED, Andruff HL, Wentland JJ. Looking back: the experience of first sexual intercourse and current sexual adjustment in young heterosexual adults. J Sex Res. 2012;49:27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Palmer M, Clarke L, Ploubidis GB, Mercer CH, Gibson LJ, Johnson AM, et al. Is “sexual competence” at first heterosexual intercourse associated with subsequent sexual health status? J Sex Res. 2017;54:91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    World Health Organization (WHO). Defining sexual health: report of technical consultation on sexual health 28-31 January 2002. Geneva: Sex. Heal. Doc. Ser; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jokisaari M. Regret appraisals, age, and subjective well-being. J Res Pers. 2003;37:487–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rudolph KD. Gender differences in emotional responses to interpersonal stress during adolescence. J Adolesc Health. 2002;30:3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sprecher S, Barbee A, Schwartz P. “Was it good for you, too?”: gender differences in first sexual intercourse experiences. J Sex Res. 1995;32:3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cotton S, Mills L, Succop PA, Biro FM, Rosenthal SL. Adolescent girls’ perceptions of the timing of their sexual initiation: “too young” or “just right”? J Adolesc Health. 2004;34:453–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Guggino JM, Ponzetti JJ. Gender differences in affective reactions to first coitus. J Adolesc. 1997;20:189–200.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 10 ways STDs impact women differently from men: CDC Fact Sheet; 2011. [cited 2019 Jan 9].

  37. 37.

    Eshbaugh EM, Gute G. Hookups and sexual regret among college women. J Soc Psychol. 2008;148:77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Currie C, Inchley J, Molcho M, Lenzi M, Veselska Z, wild F. Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study protocol: background, methodology and mandatory items for the 2013/14 survey. St Andrews: CAHRU; 2014. editor

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tourangeau R, Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:859–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rajmil L, Herdman M, Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Alonso J. Socioeconomic inequalities in mental health and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents from 11 European countries. Int J Public Health. 2014;59:95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Authors thank the schools and students for their participation in the French-speaking Belgian HBSC survey. They also thank the HBSC international coordination centre (University of St Andrews, United Kingdom) and the HBSC data management centre (University of Bergen, Norway) for their scientific support, as well as Patrick De Smet (SIPES, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium) for his collaboration in data cleaning and management.


The Wallonia-Brussels Federation (FWB), the Birth and Children Office (ONE), the Walloon Region, the Brussels-Capital Region and the French Community Commission provided financial support for the conduct of the 2014 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study. Researchers performed the study (study design, data collection, analyses, interpretation and writing) independently of the funding bodies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to protection of personal data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information




MR analysed and drafted the manuscript. NM and KC supervised analyses and co-wrote the manuscript. MD, EM, TL, CP, CS and IG contributed to interpretation and revised manuscript. NM and IG collected data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manon Rouche.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

School authorities approved and allowed to carry out the survey. This protocol was not submitted to a medical ethics committee in view of topics and methods used for data collection (Belgian law of May 7, 2004 and Advisory Committee on Bioethics of Belgium, opinion n°40, 12/2/2007).

Students were clearly informed about the survey content and about their full right to not fill in the questionnaire or some questions within the questionnaire. No parents’ consent was requested. All procedures implemented during the data collection enabled confidentiality and anonymity.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional File

Additional File 1:

Multivariatea logistic regression for low health-related quality of lifeb. HBSC, French-speaking Belgium, 2014 (n = 1659). (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rouche, M., Castetbon, K., Dujeu, M. et al. Feelings about the timing of first sexual intercourse and health-related quality of life among adolescents. BMC Public Health 19, 408 (2019).

Download citation


  • Adolescents
  • Health-related quality of life
  • First sexual intercourse
  • HBSC
  • Belgium