Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Cancer incidence in the East Azerbaijan province of Iran in 2015–2016: results of a population-based cancer registry

BMC Public Health201818:1266

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6119-9

  • Received: 11 January 2018
  • Accepted: 12 October 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Few countries in the Middle East have a population-based cancer registry, despite a clear need for accurate cancer statistics in this region. We therefore established a registry in the East Azerbaijan province, the sixth largest province in northwestern Iran.

Methods

We actively collected data from 20 counties, 62 cities, and 44 districts for the period between 20th March 2015 and 19th March 2016 (one Iranian solar year). The CanReg5 software was then used to estimate age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) per 100,000 for all cancers and different cancer types.

Results

Data for 11,536 patients were identified, but we only analyzed data for 6655 cases after removing duplicates and non-residents. The ASR for all cancers, except non-melanoma skin cancer, was 167.1 per 100,000 males and 125.7 per 100,000 females. The most common cancers in men were stomach (ASR 29.7), colorectal (ASR 18.2), bladder (ASR 17.6), prostate (ASR 17.3), and lung (ASR 15.4) cancers; in women, they were breast (ASR 31.1), colorectal (ASR 13.7), stomach (13.3), thyroid (ASR 7.8), and esophageal (ASR 7.1) cancers. Both the death certificate rate (19.5%) and the microscopic verification rate (65%) indicated that the data for the cancer registry were of reasonable quality.

Conclusion

The results of the East Azerbaijan Population-based Cancer Registry show a high incidence of cancer in this province, especially gastrointestinal cancers.

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Registry
  • Population-based
  • Iran
  • Incidence

Background

Cancer is a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. According to the GLOBOCAN project, there were an estimated 14.1 million new cases and 8.2 million deaths from cancer globally in 2012 [1]. In 2013, the cancer incidence increased to 14.9 million new cancer cases [2]. Programs for population-based cancer registration are considered the gold standard method for collecting data on all new cancer cases. Moreover, these programs are essential for estimating the burden of cancer in specific populations, particularly when seeking to provide a framework for clarifying community-based risk factors and monitoring efforts to control cancer [24]. A National Pathology-based Cancer Registry Program was started in Iran in 2001 and was subsequently rolled out to all provinces, including the East Azerbaijan province [5]. However, there were large differences in the coverage of cancer registry program in all state and provinces of Iran, which made this program cover about 60-70% of all cancer cases data. [59] Etemadi et al. has described the numerous attempts to establish a population-based cancer registry in Iran [9, 10]. One registry was maintained in the Golestan province [1113], and its most recent results were published in the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) monograph, “Cancer in Five Continents,” in 2013 [14].

The first population-based studies in Iran estimated the incidence rates of all cancer types during 1996–2000 in the Golestan, Mazandaran, and Kerman provinces [15], for the Ardabil Province for 1996–1999 [7], and for the East Azerbaijan province for 2006–2007 [16]. The Iranian national population-based cancer registration is following a five-year plan, covering 14 provinces in its first phase, and is funded by the involved universities. The East Azerbaijan Population-based Cancer Registry (EA-PBCR) was established in 2006-2007, based on the goals and responsibilities directed by the chancellor of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. In the EA-PBCR, high rates were reported for gastric cancer (ASR 37.6 per 100,000) and esophageal cancer (ASR 24.1 per 100,000) in men, and high rates were reported for breast cancer (ASR 23.5 per 100,000) in women [16]. Stomach cancer was the most common cancer in the north and northwest of Iran [17], as well as in the Ardabil Province for both men and women, and this region has since been considered a high-risk region for stomach cancer [18]. Indeed, according to Marzban et al., death from stomach cancer is up to six-fold higher in this region compared with southern Iran [7, 19].

In this study, we aimed to establish a standard population-based cancer registry in the East Azerbaijan province. The component aims were to create the necessary infrastructures, to initiate networking and collaborations between data sources, and to estimate the incidence rates for different cancers in this province. Research grants were obtained for stable funding, and we ensured proper governance and agreement among stakeholders. In this paper, we report the first results of the EA-PBCR.

Methods

Data source

Well-trained health information technology staff (the EA-PBCR team) collected data from 20 counties, 62 cities, and 44 districts about newly diagnosed cancers between March 20, 2015, and March 19, 2016 (one Iranian solar year). Sources included the following: pathology reports from 33 centers (including pathology and cytology reports); the medical records from 20 educational and private hospital, radiotherapy, and hematology centers; and 35 imaging centers. In several pathology laboratories and hospitals, data were obtained electronically from their information technology systems. Data for cancer-related deaths were obtained from death certificate registry data stored at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Also, we linked the last three years data of the national pathology-based cancer registry of Iran (INPCR), which led to the removal of additional duplicate records.

Data were imported to CanReg5 software (Persian Version), which is an open-source tool that allowed information input, storage, checking, and processing. The data were then divided into patient, tumor, and source tables. The following information was mandatory for inclusion in the study: first and last name, birth date, fathers name, national identification (NID) number, sex, place of residence, and date of diagnosis. The morphology (i.e., histology, behavior, and grade) and topography (primary site of origin) of the tumor, based on the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology Third Edition (ICD-O-3), were also reported [20]. Contact information was available for about 75% of cases, which will allow direct access to individual data in future studies. We then completed data entry, quality control, consistency checks, and basic analysis, using the Persian Version of CanReg5.

Population of East Azerbaijan Province

The East Azerbaijan province is one of 31 provinces of Iran and is the biggest and most populated province of northwest Iran (Fig. 1). It has the sixth largest population overall, and the largest Azeri ethnic population, in Iran. It covers an area of 45,620 km2 and had a total population of 3,911,278 according to the 2015 national census in Iran. The EA-PBCR is held in the capital city, Tabriz.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Map of Iran showing East Azerbaijan (cities are shown in the inset)

Figure 2 shows a population pyramid for the East Azerbaijan province by age and sex group, emphasizing that the population was young, with a predominance of people aged 20–24 years. Population density can be seen to reduce gradually with increasing age, such that very few people aged 60–64 years and older were included. Table 1 shows the age-stratification groups in East Azerbaijan during the study period (Table 1, Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The population distribution pyramid in the East Azerbaijan province, based on the national census report 2015–2016

Table 1

The Exact Stratification Age Groups of East Azerbaijan, in 2015-2016

Age Groups

East Azerbaijan Population in 2015-2016

 

Male

Female

 

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

0-4

169800

8.6

158784

8.13

05-9

138911

7.08

131924

6.76

10-14

118312

6.03

114243

5.85

15-19

118626

6.05

112435

5.76

20-24

175709

8.96

174799

8.96

25-29

220102

11.22

215155

11.02

30-34

201802

10.29

203414

10.42

35-39

161729

8.24

158998

8.15

40-44

147239

7.51

144716

7.41

45-49

114286

5.82

112376

5.76

50-54

107647

5.49

113117

5.79

55-59

90381

4.61

91775

4.70

60-64

51949

2.64

60494

3.10

65-69

40524

2.06

48308

2.47

70-74

33805

1.72

37716

1.93

75-79

32998

1.68

33058

1.69

80-84

19272

0.98

20775

1.06

85<

17382

0.88

18717

0.95

Total

1960474

100

1950804

100

Quality control

The CanReg5 software was used to perform automatic checks for internal validity. We also performed quality control by manual and computerized validity checks of the cancer registry system based on the IARC criteria [21] in the cancer registry office of East Azerbaijan province. This involved assessing factors influencing comparability, validity, timeliness, and completeness [2225]. Case duplication across the registry databases was checked in three steps to exclude repeated cases, as follows: 1) patient first name, family name; 2) patient first name, family name, and fathers’ name; and 3) patient NID number. For multiple primary tumors we referred to IARC multiple primary rules for patients multiple primary cancers [26].

Also we discuss with an expert oncologist and pathologist, to determine primary tumors from invasion, metastasis, or recurrence cancer cases according the morphology and behavior of cancers, to avoid any missed and/or duplicated cancer data.

Microscopic verification (MV) is an important quality indicator for any cancer registry. We therefore automatically collected MV data from all available pathology reports (including histological and cytological reports) in laboratory databases. In some cases, these data were collected manually. Cases obtained from the death certificate registry without pathology or clinical data were reported as death certificate only (DCO) cases. We then aimed to decrease the percentage of DCO cases (i.e., the DCO %). First, we performed data linkage with several sources to identify histologic or clinical information. Second, we contacted patients or their relatives to increase the frequency of cases with MV or clinical data. Next, the incidence and mortality rates in the EA-PBCR for the period of study were used to calculate the mortality-to-incidence (M/I) ratio. The mortality data for this analysis were collected from our cancer registry, observed deaths (reports from follow-up records), or the national death certificate registry (reported deaths).

Statistical analyses

Descriptive data are presented as means ± standard deviation or as numbers and percentages, unless otherwise stated. We estimated the frequencies, crude incidence rates, and age-standardized incidence rates (ASR) per 100,000 populations for all cancers, as well as for the different cancers among men and women. These ASRs per 100,000 were reported for each cancer in 18 strata of 5-year age groups. The standard world population for 2000 was used to estimate the ASR [27].

Results

Study sample

Figure 3 shows the process and role of different data sources in the EA-PBCR. We merged 3954 records from pathology reports with 4416 reports from the medical records of hospital departments and 3166 reports from death certificates (n = 11536 cases). After removing 3044 duplicates and 629 records for patients who were referred from neighboring provinces, 7863 records remained. Then, we removed an additional 1616 duplicate records after linkage with INPCR (6247 remained). An additional 408 cases were included during follow-up investigations of patients who were referred to other cities. Finally, the cohort comprised 6655 incident cases that met the inclusion criteria (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Data linkage and the removal of duplicates and non-residents from the EA-PBCR for 2015–2016

Data quality

Validity and completeness

After rigorous assessment, 65.1% of the cases were found to have MV, including histology (63.2%) and cytology (1.9%) results. Furthermore, 15.2% of reports were collected based on clinical data, including medical records (14%) and imaging reports (1.2%). The remaining data were collected from the cause of death registry (19.5%) and from autopsy records (0.2%), producing a final DCO% of 19.7%.

The M/I ratio

The M/I ratio was about 59% (3954/6655), indicating that we received a sufficient number of records from the cause of death registry and that the DCO% was reasonable.

Death certificate notification

The total number of cancer deaths in the cause of death registry for East Azerbaijan was 3166. After removing duplicates by linking the database with current and previous cancer registries, we searched for tumor information from alternative sources to improve the validity of our results because the DCO% was high (19.7%). Following this, 1267 cases remained for analysis (1267/6655=19.0%). Data from death certificates and contact with hospitals and patients’ relatives uncovered the clinical or pathology reports for a further 177 patients. These additions allowed us to change the basis of the associated diagnoses ([1267 − 177] / 6655 = 1090 / 6655 = 16.4%). Thus, although the initial data had a higher DCO%, this decreased after linkage with the different databases, after contacting relatives to remove cases diagnosed previously, and after clarifying the clinical and histological information.

Cancer incidence

Of the 6655 new cancer cases in during the Iranian solar year under study, males accounted for 3728 (56.02 %) and females accounted for 2927 (43.98%), giving a male-to-female ratio of 1.27. The overall mean age was 60.97 ± 17.21 years, but this was higher for men (63.68 ± 16.68 years) and lower for women (57.53 ± 17.27 years).

Except for non-melanoma skin cancer (ICD-O-3 code C44), the crude incidence rates per 100,000 were 175.2 for men and 141.0 for women. The ASRs per 100,000 for all cancers were 167.1 for men and 125.7 for women. The five most common cancers were stomach (ASR 29.7), colorectal (ASR 18.2), bladder (ASR 17.6), prostate (ASR 17.3), and lung (ASR 15.4) for men; and for women, these were breast (ASR 31.1), colorectal (ASR 13.7), stomach (ASR 13.3), thyroid (ASR 7.8), and esophageal (ASR 7.1). Table 2 and Figs. 4, 5 summarize these results, while Table 3 shows the morphologic distributions and frequencies of the most common cancers in the province during 2015–2016 (Tables 2, 3, Figs. 4, 5).
Table 2

ASRs for the top ten major cancers in males and females in East Azerbaijan Province in 2015-2016

Male

Female

Site (ICD-O-3)a

No. of Cases

Proportion (%)

CIRb

ASRc

Site (ICD-O-3)

No. of Cases

Proportion (%)

CIR

ASR

Stomach (C16)

610

17.8

31.1

29.7

Breast (C50)

681

24.8

34.9

31.1

Colorectal (C18-21)

366

10.7

18.7

18.2

Colorectal (C18-21)

299

10.8

15.4

13.7

Bladder (C67)

356

10.4

18.2

17.6

Stomach (C16)

302

11.0

15.5

13.3

Prostate (C61)

369

10.7

18.8

17.3

Thyroid (C73)

175

6.4

9.0

7.8

Lung (C33-34)

320

9.3

16.3

15.4

Esophagus (C15)

157

5.7

8.0

7.1

Leukemia (C91-95)

196

5.7

10

9.6

Leukemia (C91-95)

117

4.2

6

5.5

Esophagus (C15)

172

5.0

8.8

8.0

Lung (C33-34)

117

4.3

6.0

5.0

Lymphoma (C81-85,88,90,96)

126

3.7

6.4

6.4

Ovary (C56)

97

3.5

5.0

4.8

Liver (C22)

115

3.3

5.9

5.9

Bladder (C67)

87

3.2

4.5

3.9

Brain& CNS (C70-72)

111

3.2

5.7

5.3

Liver (C22)

82

3.0

4.2

3.5

aInternational Classification of Diseases for Oncology Third Edition code

bCrude Incidence Rate

cAge-standardized Incidence Rate

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

a ASRs for the top five major cancers in males. b ASRs for the top five major cancers in females

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Crude incidence rates of all cancers in East Azerbaijan cities

Table 3

Morphologic Distribution and Frequency of most common cancers in East Azerbaijan Province in 2015-2016

Cancer Site

 

Frequent

Percent

Cancer Site

 

Frequent

Percent

Cancer Site

 

Frequent

Percent

Cardiac Gastric Cancer

Gender

  

Esophageal Cancer

Gender

  

Breast Cancer

Gender

  

Neoplasm, Malignant

Male

4

7.0

Neoplasm, Malignant

Male

14

8.1

Neoplasm, Malignant

Male

1

0.14

Female

2

8.0

Female

9

5.7

Female

43

6.09

Epithelial Tumor, Malignant

Male

1

1.8

Epithelial Tumor, Malignant

Male

4

2.3

Carcinoma

Male

-

-

Female

-

-

Female

2

1.3

Female

28

3.96

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Male

1

1.8

Squamous Cell carcinoma

Male

131

75.7

Papillary Carcinoma

Male

1

0.14

Female

8

32.0

Female

141

88.7

Female

-

-

Adenocarcinoma/NOS

Male

24

42.1

Adenocarcinoma/NOS

Male

9

5.2

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Male

-

-

Female

8

32.0

Female

5

3.1

Female

1

0.14

Adenocarcinoma, Intestinal Type

Male

19

33.3

Adenocarcinoma, Intestinal Type

Male

12

6.9

Adenocarcinoma

Male

-

-

Female

4

16.0

Female

1

.6

Female

1

0.14

Adenocarcinoma, Diffuse Type

Male

4

7.0

Adenocarcinoma, Diffuse Type

Male

-

-

Tubular Adenocarcinoma

Male

-

-

Female

1

4.0

Female

-

-

Female

1

0.14

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Male

1

1.8

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Male

1

.6

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Male

-

-

Female

-

-

Female

-

-

Female

1

0.14

Sebaceous Adenocarcinoma

Male

-

-

Sebaceous Adenocarcinoma

Male

-

-

Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma

Male

-

-

Female

1

4.0

Female

-

-

Female

1

0.14

Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma

Male

3

5.3

Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma

Male

1

.6

Ductal Carcinoma

Male

12

1.6

Female

1

4.0

Female

-

-

Female

587

83.14

Others

Male

-

-

Others

Male

1

.6

Medullary Carcinoma

Male

-

-

 

Female

-

-

Female

1

.6

Female

8

1.13

Total

Male

57

100.0

Total

Male

173

100.0

Lobular Carcinoma

Male

-

-

Female

25

100.0

Female

159

100.0

Female

17

2.40

Non-Cardiac Gastric Cancer

   

Colorectal Cancer

   

Infiltrating Ductal and Lobular Carcinoma

Male

-

-

Neoplasm, Malignant

Male

55

9.9

Neoplasm, Malignant

Male

20

5.4

Female

1

0.14

Female

31

11.1

Female

33

10.7

Phylloides Tumor Malignant

Male

-

-

Epithelial Tumor, Malignant

Male

7

1.3

Epithelial Tumor, Malignant

Male

1

.3

Female

2

0.28

Female

6

2.1

Female

-

-

Myeloid Sarcoma

Male

-

-

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Male

3

.5

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Male

2

.5

Female

1

0.14

Female

1

.4

Female

2

.7

Unknown

Male

-

-

Adenocarcinoma/NOS

Male

281

50.4

Adenocarcinoma/NOS

Male

330

89.9

Female

-

-

Female

147

52.5

Female

254

82.7

Total

Male

14

100.0

Adenocarcinoma, Intestinal Type

Male

155

27.8

Adenocarcinoma, Intestinal Type

Male

-

-

Female

692

100.0

Female

71

25.4

Female

1

.3

Lung Cancer

   

Adenocarcinoma, Diffuse Type

Male

18

3.2

Adenocarcinoma, Diffuse Type

Male

-

-

Neoplasm, Malignant

Male

88

19.86

Female

6

2.1

Female

1

.3

Female

40

9.02

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Male

4

.7

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Male

6

1.6

Malignant Tumor, Small Cell Type

Male

2

0.45

Female

1

.4

Female

3

1.0

Female

-

-

Sebaceous Adenocarcinoma

Male

-

-

Sebaceous Adenocarcinoma

Male

-

-

Malignant Tumor, Spindle Cell Type

Male

-

-

Female

-

-

Female

-

-

Female

1

0.22

Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma

Male

26

4.7

Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma

Male

4

1.1

Carcinoma

Male

11

2.48

Female

13

4.6

Female

4

1.3

Female

5

1.12

Others

Male

2

.4

Others

Male

4

1.2

Small Cell Carcinoma, NOS

Male

12

2.70

Female

3

1.1

Female

6

1.8

Female

3

0.67

Unknown

Male

6

1.1

Unknown

Male

-

-

Non-small Cell Carcinoma

Male

5

1.12

Female

1

.4

Female

-

-

Female

1

0.22

Total

Male

551

100.0

Total

Male

367

100.0

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Male

172

38.81

Female

279

100.0

Female

307

100.0

Female

54

12.18

Thyroid Cancer

   

Prostate

   

Adenocarcinoma

Male

27

6.09

Neoplasm, Malignant

Male

4

1.70

Neoplasm, Malignant

Male

19

5.09

Female

9

2.03

Female

8

3.40

Female

-

-

Carcinoid Tumor, NOS

Male

-

-

Papillary Carcinoma

Male

9

3.82

Carcinoma

Male

78

20.91

Female

4

0.90

Female

28

11.91

Female

-

-

Bronchiolo-Alveolar Adenocarcinoma, NOS

Male

3

0.67

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Male

-

-

Carcinoma, Undifferentiated ,NOS

Male

1

0.26

Female

-

-

Female

1

0.42

Female

-

-

Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma,

Male

1

0.22

Papillary Adenocarcinoma

Male

41

17.44

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Male

1

0.26

Female

-

-

Female

101

42.97

Female

-

-

Sarcoma, NOS

Male

-

-

Oxyphilic Adenocarcinoma

Male

1

0.42

Transitional Cell Carcinoma, NOS

Male

3

0.80

Female

1

0.22

Female

6

2.55

Female

-

-

Spindle cell Sarcoma

Male

1

0.22

Follicular Adenocarcinoma

Male

2

0.85

Papillary Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Male

3

0.80

Female

-

-

Female

13

5.52

Female

-

-

Total

Male

322

100.0

Insular Carcinoma

Male

-

-

Adenocarcinoma

Male

266

71.31

 

Female

118

100.0

Female

1

0.42

Female

-

-

Bladder Cancer

Gender

  

Papillary Carcinoma, Follicular Variant

Male

3

1.27

Adenocarcinoma, Intestinal Type

Male

2

0.53

Neoplasm, Malignant

Male

17

3.82

Female

13

5.53

Female

-

-

Female

2

0.44

Medullary Carcinoma with Amyloid Stroma

Male

1

0.42

Unknown

Male

-

-

Transitional Cell Carcinoma, NOS

Male

217

48.76

Female

-

 

Female

-

-

Female

49

11.01

Mixed Medullary Carcinoma

Male

2

.84

Total

Male

373

100.0

Papillary Carcinoma

Male

1

0.22

Female

-

 

Female

-

-

Female

1

0.22

Medullary Carcinoma, NOS

Male

-

     

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Male

1

0.22

Female

3

1.27

    

Female

-

-

Total

Male

62

100.0

    

Papillary Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Male

117

26.29

Female

173

100.0

    

Female

34

7.64

        

Adenocarcinoma

Male

2

0.44

        

Female

1

0.22

        

Carcinoid tumor, NOS

Male

3

0.66

        

Female

-

-

        

Total

Male

358

100.0

        

Female

87

100.0

Discussion

The EA-PBCR was established to allow accurate estimates of annual statistics in the province by collecting information on incident cases of cancer from various sources. The main data sources in this study were pathology reports, medical records, and death certificate. However, records from additional sources were also used to improve the completeness and validity of the results, including from radiotherapy and chemotherapy departments, imaging facilities, and hematology laboratories. The ASRs for all cancers in 2015, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, were 167.1 per 100,000 for males and 125.7 per 100,000 for females. Our data show that the five most common cancers in this region, by sex, were stomach, colorectal, bladder, prostate, and lung in men, and were breast, colorectal, stomach, thyroid, and esophageal in women. Importantly, both the DCO% and the MV rate indicate that the EA-PBCR data were of reasonable quality. Our results are also comparable with those of GLOBOCAN 2012 and of the latest report of Golestan Province population-based cancer registry (Table 4), which are the most recent and reliable to have been published for Iran [1, 28].
Table 4

Comparing of age standardized incidence rate (ASR) for most common cancers in Iran (GLOBOCAN 2012), Golestan Province Population Based Cancer Registry Results (2004–2013), and East Azerbaijan Population Based Cancer Registry Results (2015–2016)

Cancer Site

Gender

GLOBOCAN 2012 Iran

Golestan Province Population Based Cancer Registry Results (2004-2013)

East Azerbaijan Population Based Cancer Registry Results (2015-2016)

Number

% Total

ASR

Number

% Total

ASR

Number

% Total

ASR

Esophagus

Male

2898

6.5

9.0

1221

12.3

21.6

171

5.0

8.9

Female

2445

6.1

8.0

930

10.5

16.8

157

5.7

8.3

Stomach

Male

6640

14.8

20.6

1576

15.8

27.4

610

17.7

32.9

Female

3020

7.6

9.7

686

7.8

12.0

301

10.9

15.6

Colorectal

Male

3811

8.5

11.6

911

9.2

14.9

412

12.0

22.7

Female

3352

8.4

10.5

715

8.1

11.6

332

12.1

17.8

Leukemia

Male

2338

5.2

6.9

817

8.2

12.3

196

5.7

9.6

Female

1588

4.0

4.7

599

6.7

9.1

117

4.2

5.5

Lymphoma

Male

2611

5.9

7.3

567

5.7

8.0

126

3.7

6.4

Female

1703

4.2

4.9

333

3.8

4.5

69

2.4

3.6

Lung

Male

3307

7.4

10.3

907

9.1

16.0

322

9.4

17.4

Female

1581

4.0

5.0

362

4.1

6.2

118

4.3

6.1

Melanoma (Skin)

Male

295

0.7

0.9

661

6.6

11.4

9

0.3

0.4

Female

239

0.6

0.7

416

4.7

7.1

3

0.1

0.1

Breast

Male

-

-

-

-

-

-

14

0.4

0.7

Female

9795

24.5

28.1

2121

24.0

29.3

683

24.7

36.0

Ovary

Male

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Female

1637

4.1

4.8

400

4.5

5.7

97

3.5

5.4

Prostate

Male

4111

9.2

12.6

690

6.9

12.0

369

10.7

19.4

Female

-

-

-

   

-

-

-

Bladder

Male

4277

9.5

13.2

529

5.3

9.2

356

10.4

19.8

Female

1066

2.7

3.4

   

87

3.2

4.6

Brain, CNS

Male

1699

3.8

4.6

475

4.8

6.9

111

3.2

5.9

Female

1358

3.4

3.9

369

4.2

5.3

69

2.5

3.7

Thyroid

Male

513

1.1

1.4

-

-

-

63

1.8

3.1

Female

1512

3.8

4.0

-

-

-

173

6.3

8.6

All cancers excl. non-melanoma skin cancer

Male

44838

100.0

134.7

10577

100.0

175.0

3439

100.0

186.0

Female

39991

100.0

120.1

9230

100.0

142.4

2761

100.0

146.1

The EA-PBCR has followed international standards for data collection and reporting since its inception. For example, we linked available data from different sources to improve the validity and completeness of our results. Indeed, the MV rate, the DCO%, and the M/I ratio were comparable to those reported for middle-income countries [2932]. Another advantage was that we created a unique NID number as a mandatory item for use by hospitals, cause of death registries, and most laboratories. This number allows for deterministic data linkage and for improvements in data validity and completeness. However, the EA-PBCR is still in its infancy, and we faced some important limitations. The DCO%, for example, was still high and was difficult to decrease in the first year. Also NID was not available for all databases, and we will try to improve this in our next reports.

We believe that the quality indicators will improve rapidly as we move forward. To improve the quality of the data produced from these sources, we have called for greater collaboration with the cause of death registry and with hospital managers.

According to this study, gastric cancer—which is the fourth most common cancer worldwide—was the most common cancer among males (ASR 29.7 per 100,000) and the third most common cancer among females (ASR 13.3 per 100,000). A few studies of the incidence of gastrointestinal cancer have been performed in the East Azerbaijan province [5, 16, 3335]. In the most recent survey of gastrointestinal cancer in this province between 2007 and 2011, the ASR for gastric cancer was raised in both men (26 per 100,000) and women (11.6 per 100,000), and it was the second-leading cause of death (10.4% of all deaths) [34]. Other research showed that stomach cancer has been the most common cancer in north and northwestern Iran over the past 30 years [17, 18, 36]. The highest ASRs for stomach cancer in men (51.8; 95% CI 47.8–55.8) and women (24.9; 95% CI 21.5–27.2) per 100,000 were reported for the Ardebil province in 2010 [7, 18, 37]. Gastric cancer is also known to be the most common cause of cancer-related death in the country, although there is a reported six-fold geographic variation in mortality rates between northwestern and southern Iran [19]. The elevated risk of stomach cancer incidence and mortality in the northwestern region has been linked to the higher prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection [38, 39], tobacco and opium use, and dietary factors [4045]. A well-designed case–control study in northern Iran showed a positive association between red meat consumption and the risk of gastric cancer [46].

The incidence rates of bladder cancer (ASR 17.6 per 100,000) and lung cancer (ASR 15.4 per 100,000), which are associated with tobacco smoking and opium use [47, 48], were also high in the male population. Studies in the 1980s in Southern Iran [49] and recent studies from Golestan in northwestern Iran [50] have shown that opium is a more important risk factor for bladder cancer than tobacco. Opium use is also common in East Azerbaijan (unpublished data from a Persian cohort) and may play an important role in the etiology of bladder cancer in this province.

The ASR of lung cancer was higher, based on clinical diagnosis or DCO, in the EA-PBCR than the rate reported for Iran in GLOBOCAN 2012 (i.e., 15.4 versus 10.3 per 100,000) [1]. In the Golestan population-based cancer registry, the incidence of lung cancer was also higher than the Iranian average for males (ASR = 17.5 per 100,000) [14]. Therefore, it appears that both the pathology-based registry [6, 9], and GLOBOCAN 2012 may have underestimated the true incidence of lung cancer in Iran. The ASR of lung cancer was also low among females in both Tabriz (ASR 5 per 100,000) and Golestan (ASR 5.6 per 100,000) [14]. A recent analysis of the “National Surveys of Risk Factor of Non-Communicable Diseases (STEPS)” [sic] showed that the prevalence of cigarette smoking was high in northwestern Iran, and that 23.7% of men in the East Azerbaijan province reported being smokers [51]. By comparison, the prevalence of cigarette smoking is reported to be much lower (12.4%) among men in the Bushehr province of southern Iran, where water pipe smoking is preferred; here, the prevalence of water pipe use was reportedly 10% for men and 14.8% for women [51]. Therefore, the high incidence rates for lung and bladder cancers in the East Azerbaijan province may be linked to cigarette smoking, highlighting the importance of tobacco control measures in this region. Opium use is also an emerging risk factor for both respiratory tract and lung cancers [52], with recent cohort studies from Golestan revealing the important role of opium in such cancers [53].

The incidence rates of colorectal, prostate, and breast cancer are increasing in low- and middle-income countries [54, 55], including Iran [33, 5658]. This study showed that the incidence rates for colorectal cancer were high for both men (20.2 per 100,000) and women (16.2 per 100,000). Likewise, high incidence rates were identified for breast cancer in women (ASR 31 per 100,000) and for prostate cancer in men (ASR 17.3 per 100,000) in the East Azerbaijan province. The World Health Organization Office in the Eastern Mediterranean Region recently published a series of recommendations for early cancer detection [59], and although they did not recommend the need for organized colorectal or breast cancer screening, they did emphasize the need for early diagnosis through improvements in public awareness and management of symptomatic patients. This recommendation might be valid for now, but we need to be prepared for a more comprehensive colonoscopy and mammography screening program in the future, when the incidence rates for these cancers can be expected to increase, making screening programs the most cost-effective options. Worldwide, prostate cancer screening is not recommended because of the high false-positive rate when using the prostate-specific antigen [59].

Based on the national cancer registry results in Iran, thyroid and laryngeal cancers are among the most common cancers of the head and neck, with oral and thyroid cancers being predominant in females [60]. Our results also showed a higher incidence of thyroid cancer in females (ASR = 7.78); indeed, it was the fourth most common cancer after breast, colorectal, and stomach cancers, with an ASR that was increased compared with a previous report from East Azerbaijan [16]. Significant associations between increased thyroid cancer incidence and lifestyle risk factors, radiation exposure, smoking, and obesity have been reported in a few studies [6163]. The difference in the pattern of thyroid cancer incidence in our female cohort demands more comprehensive studies, which we have already started. The results of these will be presented soon.

Esophageal cancer may be one of the least common cancers in most countries, but it is the fourth most common cancer in Iran, being the second-leading cause of cancer and cancer-related mortality. The highest incidence rates have been reported for northern provinces [13]. According to the most recent results of studies in this region, there was a significant decrease in the incidence of esophageal cancer [34, 64]. However, we still observed a high incidence of esophageal cancer, especially in females, which was the fifth most common cancer among women. Compared with previous reports from the cancer registry, the ASR for esophageal cancer has shown a decrease in East Azerbaijan over the last decade [16, 34].

Finally, we found that the incidence of gynecological cancers, including ovarian (ASR 4.8 per 100,000), cervical (ASR 1.58 per 100,000), and endometrial (ASR 2.8 per 100,000) cancers, were low in East Azerbaijan. The extremely low incidence of cervical cancer was comparable to that previously reported for the Ardabil Province [7]. The prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in women has been reported at 6.1% in the East Azerbaijan province [65], compared with 7% in Iran in general [66]. This comparatively low prevalence may be attributable to the local Muslim culture, in which more people engage in safer sexual behaviors and fewer people have multiple sexual partners [16, 6668]. Given the low incidence of cervical cancer, neither a cervical screening program nor a HPV vaccination program would be cost-effective in this area. However, sexual behavior is changing in younger generations, and this may lead to an increase in the rate of HPV infection and the risk of cervical cancer in the future. Therefore, regular monitoring of the incidence of HPV infection and cervical cancer is warranted [69].

Conclusions

In this study, we presented the most current and reliable data for cancer incidence in northwestern Iran. The quality of the EA-PBCR is promising, and we believe that maintaining and developing this registry will establish a high-quality population-based cancer registry in the region. The results from the EA-PBCR could also be used to estimate cancer-specific incidence and mortality rates in Iran and neighboring countries, making it a potentially invaluable resource for the planning and monitoring of cancer control programs and for the delivery of reliable epidemiological research. Moving forward, our main aims will be to perform survival analyses of the most common cancers in East Azerbaijan, to ensure that the registry continues to exist, and to further develop the follow-up system.

Abbreviations

ASR: 

Age-standardized incidence rate

CI: 

Confidence interval

CLIN: 

Clinical

DCO: 

Death certificate only

EA-PBCR: 

East Azerbaijan Population-based Cancer Registry

HPV: 

Human papillomavirus

IARC: 

International Agency for Research on Cancer

ICD-O-3: 

International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition

MV: 

Microscopic verification

NID: 

National identification number

STEPS: 

National Surveys of Risk Factor of Non-Communicable Diseases

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. We would like to acknowledge the technical support of the Cancer Institute at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Finally, Dr Robert Sykes (www.doctored.org.uk) provided technical editing services during several drafts of this manuscript.

Funding

This research project was supported and funded by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number: IR.TBZMED.REC.1395.1333).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the study will be made available by the corresponding author following a reasonable request.

Disclosure

The abstract of this work has been presented as “Oral Presentation” in:

1. International Association of cancer Registry Annual Conference, 17-19 October 2017, Utrecht, Netherlands, by the title of: “Result of the New Initiative to established East Azerbaijan Population Based cancer Registry (EA-PBCR) in 2015”

2. International Congress on Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Integration of Research & Action , 28-30 January 2017 , Tehran , Iran, by the title of : “Preliminary Results of East Azerbaijan Population-Based Cancer registry during 2015-2016”Second Comprehensive Report of Cancer Incidence (Archives of Iranian Medicine, Volume 20, Number 1, January 2017 (Suppl. 1) S18)

Authors’ contributions

RD and KZ designed the study, supervised the project, data abstraction, and data analysis; they prepared the initial draft and finalized it based on comments from the other authors. MHS, RM, and AN contributed to the study design and provided technical support and consultation during the conduct of the registry. SS and SN participated in the data collection, data linkage, and cleaning and analysis of the registry data. MB, JS, and LA (registrars) conducted data abstraction and cleaning. All authors reviewed each manuscript draft, participated in interpreting the results, and approved the final version.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences approved this project (Code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1395.1333). All patient data and records were stored confidentially. Consent to participate was not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
(2)
Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
(3)
Cancer Registry Office, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
(4)
Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(5)
Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
(6)
Cancer Biology Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Global Burden of Disease Cancer C, Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, et al. The Global Burden of Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(4):505–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Parkin DM. The evolution of the population-based cancer registry. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(8):603–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Roshandel G, Boreiri M, Sadjadi A, Malekzadeh R. A diversity of cancer incidence and mortality in West Asian populations. Ann Glob Health. 2014;80(5):346–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hossein Somi M, Mirinezhad K, Farhang S, et al. Gastrointestinal cancer occurrence in East Azarbaijan: a five year study from North Western Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7(2):309–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zendehdel K, Sedigh Z, Hassanloo J, Nahvijou A. Audit of a Nationwide pathology-based cancer registry in Iran. Basic Clin Cancer Res. 2011;2:7–13.Google Scholar
  7. Sadjadi A, Malekzadeh R, Derakhshan MH, et al. Cancer occurrence in Ardabil: results of a population-based cancer registry from Iran. Int J Cancer. 2003;107(1):113–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sadjadi A, Zahedi MJ, Darvish Moghaddam S, et al. The First Population-Based Cancer Survey in Kerman Province of Iran. Iranian J Publ Health. 2007;36(4):26-34.Google Scholar
  9. Etemadi A, Sadjadi A, Semnani S, Nouraie SM, Khademi H, Bahadori M. Cancer registry in Iran: a brief overview. Arch Iran Med. 2008;11(5):577–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hadji M, Nahvijou A, Seddighi Z, et al. Challenges to promoting population-based cancer registration in Iran: a workshop report. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(10):6189–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kmet J, Mahboubi E. Esophageal cancer in the Caspian littoral of Iran: initial studies. Science. 1972;175(4024):846–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mahboubi E, Kmet J, Cook PJ, Day NE, Ghadirian P, Salmasizadeh S. Oesophageal cancer studies in the Caspian Littoral of Iran: the Caspian cancer registry. Br J Cancer. 1973;28(3):197–214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kamangar F, Malekzadeh R, Dawsey SM, Saidi F. Esophageal cancer in Northeastern Iran: a review. Arch Iranian Medicine. Jan 2007;10(1):70–82.Google Scholar
  14. Roshandel G, Semnani S, Sadjadi A, et al. Cancer Incidence in Islamic Republic of Iran, Golestan Province. In: Forman D, Bray F, Brewster DH, editors. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol. X (electronic version). Vol X. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.Google Scholar
  15. Sadjadi A, Nouraie M, Mohagheghi MA, Mousavi-Jarrahi A, Malekezadeh R, Parkin DM. Cancer occurrence in Iran in 2002, an international perspective. Asian Pac J Cancer Prevention. 2005;6(3):359–63.Google Scholar
  16. Somi MH, Farhang S, Mirinezhad SK, Naghashi S, Seif-Farshad M, Golzari M. Cancer in East Azerbaijan, Iran: results of a population-based cancer registry. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9(2):327–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Malekzadeh R, Derakhshan MH, Malekzadeh Z. Gastric cancer in Iran: epidemiology and risk factors. Arch Iranian Medicine. 2009;12(6):576–83.Google Scholar
  18. Babaei M, Pourfarzi F, Yazdanbod A, et al. Gastric cancer in Ardabil, Iran--a review and update on cancer registry data. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(3):595–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zendehdel K, Marzban M, Nahvijou A, Jafari N. Six-fold Difference in the Stomach Cancer Mortality Rate between Northern and Southern Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2012;15(12):741–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, et al. International classification of diseases for oncology (ICD-O) – 3rd edition, World Health Organization. 1st revision, 2013. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/96612/1/9789241548496_eng.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2016.
  21. Bray F, Znaor A, Cueva P, et al., eds. Planning and developing population-based cancer registration in low- and middle-income settings. IARC Technical Publication No. 43, 2014. Published by the International Agency for Research on cancer. http://www.rho.org/files/IARC_Planning_developing_cancer_registries_2014.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2016.
  22. Boffetta P, Parkin DM. Cancer in developing countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 1994;44(2):81–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Black RJ, Bray F, Ferlay J, Parkin DM. Cancer incidence and mortality in the European Union: cancer registry data and estimates of national incidence for 1990. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33(7):1075–107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bray F, Guilloux A, Sankila R, Parkin DM. Practical implications of imposing a new world standard population. Cancer Causes Control. Mar 2002;13(2):175–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Skeet RG. Cancer registration: principles and methods. Quality and quality control. IARC Sci Pub. 1991;95:101–7.Google Scholar
  26. Demaret E, Ferlay J, Parkin M, Tycznski J, Whelan S. International Rules for Multiple Primary Cancers. Third ed. Lyone: France International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2004.Google Scholar
  27. Bray F, Ferlay J, Laversanne M, et al. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents: Inclusion criteria, highlights from Volume X and the global status of cancer registration. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(9):2060–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Roshandel G, Semnani S, Fazel A, et al. Building cancer registries in a lower resource setting: The 10-year experience of Golestan, Northern Iran. Cancer epidemiol. 2018;52:128–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Asthana S, Labani PS, Labani S. A review on cancer incidence in India from 25 population-based cancer registries. NTR Univ Health Sci. 2015;4:150–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Jedy-Agba E, Curado MP, Ogunbiyi O, et al. Cancer incidence in Nigeria: a report from population-based cancer registries. Cancer Epidemiol. Oct 2012;36(5):e271–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu S, Chen Q, Quan P, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in Henan province 2012. Chin J Cancer Res = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu. 16;28(3):275–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Al-Haddad BJ, Jedy-Agba E, Oga E, et al. Comparability, diagnostic validity and completeness of Nigerian cancer registries. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39(3):456–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Somi MH, Naderi N, Behshid M. Prevalence of gastrointestinal cancers in East Azerbaijan province. Pajoohandeh. 2004;39:165–9.Google Scholar
  34. Somi MH, Golzari M, Farhang S, Naghashi S, Abdollahi L. Gastrointestinal cancer incidence in East Azerbaijan, Iran: update on 5 year incidence and trends. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(9):3945–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Islami F, Kamangar F, Aghcheli K, et al. Epidemiologic features of upper gastrointestinal tract cancers in Northeastern Iran. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(7):1402–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Mansour-Ghanaei F, Sokhanvar H, Joukar F, et al. Endoscopic findings in a mass screening program for gastric cancer in a high risk region - Guilan province of Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(4):1407–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Khodadost M, Yavari P, Khodadost B, et al. Estimating the Esophagus Cancer Incidence Rate in Ardabil, Iran: A Capture-Recapture Method. Iran J Cancer Prev. 2016;9(1):e3972.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Helicobacter, Cancer Collaborative G. Gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori: a combined analysis of 12 case control studies nested within prospective cohorts. Gut. 2001;49(3):347–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Persson C, Jia Y, Pettersson H, Dillner J, Nyren O, Ye WH. pylori seropositivity before age 40 and subsequent risk of stomach cancer: a glimpse of the true relationship? PloS one. 2011;6(3):e17404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Nyren O, Adami H-O. Stomach cancer. In: Adami H-O, Hunter D, Trichopoulos D, editors. Texbook of Cancer Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  41. Sadjadi A, Derakhshan MH, Yazdanbod A, et al. Neglected role of hookah and opium in gastric carcinogenesis: a cohort study on risk factors and attributable fractions. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(1):181–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Shakeri R, Malekzadeh R, Etemadi A, et al. Opium: an emerging risk factor for gastric adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(2):455–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Islami F, Nasseri-Moghaddam S, Pourshams A, et al. Determinants of gastroesophageal reflux disease, including hookah smoking and opium use- a cross-sectional analysis of 50,000 individuals. PloS one. 2014;9(2):e89256.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Abnet CC, Saadatian-Elahi M, Pourshams A, et al. Reliability and validity of opiate use self-report in a population at high risk for esophageal cancer in Golestan, Iran. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Jun 2004;13(6):1068–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Malekzadeh MM, Khademi H, Pourshams A, et al. Opium use and risk of mortality from digestive diseases: a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(11):1757–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Zamani N, Hajifaraji M, Fazel-tabar Malekshah A, Keshtkar AA, Esmaillzadeh A, Malekzadeh R. A case-control study of the relationship between gastric cancer and meat consumption in Iran. ArchIranian Med. Jun 2013;16(6):324–9.Google Scholar
  47. Gandini S, Botteri E, Iodice S, et al. Tobacco smoking and cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(1):155–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Afshari M, Janbabaei G, Bahrami MA, Moosazadeh M. Opium and bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the odds ratios for opium use and the risk of bladder cancer. PloS one. 2017;12(6):e0178527.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Behmard S, Sadeghi A, Mohareri MR, Kadivar R. Positive association of opium addiction and cancer of the bladder. Results of urine cytology in 3,500 opium addicts. Acta Cytologica. 1981;25(2):142–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Khademi H, Malekzadeh R, Pourshams A, et al. Opium use and mortality in Golestan Cohort Study: prospective cohort study of 50,000 adults in Iran. Bmj. 2012;344:e2502.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Nemati S, Rafei A, Freedman ND, Fotouhi A, Asgary F, Zendehdel K. Cigarette and Water-Pipe Use in Iran: Geographical Distribution and Time Trends among the Adult Population; A Pooled Analysis of National STEPS Surveys, 2006-2009. Arch Iranian Med. 2017;20(5):295–301.Google Scholar
  52. Kamangar F, Shakeri R, Malekzadeh R, Islami F. Opium use: an emerging risk factor for cancer? Lancet Oncol. Feb 2014;15(2):e69–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Rahmati A, Shakeri R, Khademi H, et al. Mortality from respiratory diseases associated with opium use: a population-based cohort study. Thorax. 2017;72(11):1028–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Forman D, Bray F, Brewster DH, et al., eds. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol. X (electronic version). Vol X. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.Google Scholar
  55. Bishehsari F, Mahdavinia M, Vacca M, Malekzadeh R, Mariani-Costantini R. Epidemiological transition of colorectal cancer in developing countries: environmental factors, molecular pathways, and opportunities for prevention. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(20):6055–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Malekzadeh R, Bishehsari F, Mahdavinia M, Ansari R. Epidemiology and molecular genetics of colorectal cancer in iran: a review. Arch Iranian Medicine. 2009;12(2):161–9.Google Scholar
  57. Dolatkhah R, Somi MH, Bonyadi MJ, Asvadi Kermani I, Farassati F, Dastgiri S. Colorectal cancer in iran: molecular epidemiology and screening strategies. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;2015:643020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Dolatkhah R, Somi MH, Kermani IA, et al. Increased colorectal cancer incidence in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:997.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Policy statement and recommended actions for early detection of breast, cervical, colorectal, oral and prostate cancers in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, WHO-EM/NCD/138/E, 2016. http://applications.emro.who.int/docs/Policy_statement_2016_en_19183.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2016.
  60. Emadzadeh M, Shahidsales S, Mohammadian Bajgiran A, et al. Head and Neck Cancers in North-East Iran: A 25 year Survey. Iranian J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;29(92):137–45.Google Scholar
  61. Sadeghi H, Rafei M, Bahrami M, Haghdoost A, Shabani Y. Attributable risk fraction of four lifestyle risk factors of thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. J Public Health. 2017;09:1–8.Google Scholar
  62. Zhao ZG, Guo XG, Ba CX, et al. Overweight, obesity and thyroid cancer risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Int Med Research. 2012;40(6):2041–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Ma J, Huang M, Wang L, Ye W, Tong Y, Wang H. Obesity and risk of thyroid cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis of 21 observational studies. Med Science Monitor. 2015;21:283–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Semnani S, Sadjadi A, Fahimi S, et al. Declining incidence of esophageal cancer in the Turkmen Plain, eastern part of the Caspian Littoral of Iran: a retrospective cancer surveillance. Cancer Detection Prev. 2006;30(1):14–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Seifi S, Asvadi Kermani I, Dolatkhah R, et al. Prevalence of oral human papilloma virus in healthy individuals in East azerbaijan province of iran. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(1):79–85.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Khorasanizadeh F, Hassanloo J, Khaksar N, et al. Epidemiology of cervical cancer and human papilloma virus infection among Iranian women - analyses of national data and systematic review of the literature. Gynecologic Oncol. Feb 2013;128(2):277–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Mousavi S, Guya M, Ramazani R. Cancer Registration Report,for Year 2006. Tehran: Cancer Office, Center of Non-communicable Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, I.R. of Iran;2007.Google Scholar
  68. Haghshenas M, Golini-Moghaddam T, Rafiei A, Emadeian O, Shykhpour A, Ashrafi GH. Prevalence and type distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus in patients with cervical cancer: a population-based study. Infect Agent Cancer. 2013;8(1):20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Majidi A, Ghiasvand R, Hadji M, et al. Priority Setting for Improvement of Cervical Cancer Prevention in Iran. Int J Health Policy Manag. Nov 22 2015;5(4):225-232.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement