Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Association between induced abortion and suicidal ideation among unmarried female migrant workers in three metropolitan cities in China: a cross-sectional study

Contributed equally
BMC Public Health201818:625

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5527-1

Received: 21 December 2017

Accepted: 1 May 2018

Published: 15 May 2018

Abstract

Background

Despite reports of mental health issues, suicidality has not been closely examined among the migrant population. The association between induced abortion and suicidal ideation is unknown among unmarried female migrant workers of reproductive age in China. This study aims to examine induced abortion and suicidality among the Chinese migrant population.

Methods

We recruited 5115 unmarried female migrant workers during 2015 to 2016 from Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou, and collected demographic, psychosocial, reproductive and mental health information using structured questionnaires. We used logistic regression models to examine the association between lifetime induced abortion and suicidal ideation during the past year among the subjects.

Results

Overall, 8.2% of the subjects had suicidal ideation during the past year, and 15.5% of the subjects experienced induced abortion. Induced abortion was associated with nearly twice the odds of having past-year suicidal ideation (Odds ratio, OR = 1.89; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.46, 2.44) after adjusting for age, education, years in the working place, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, daily internet use, attitude towards premarital pregnancy, multiple induced abortion, self-esteem, loneliness, depression, and anxiety disorders. The association was stronger in those aged > 25 (OR = 3.37, 95% CI = 2.16, 5.28), with > 5 years of stay in the working place (OR = 2.98, 95% CI = 2.02, 4.39), the non-anxiety group (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.74, 3.00), and the non-depression group (OR = 2.94, 95% CI = 2.08, 4.15).

Conclusions

Induced abortion was associated with increased odds for suicidal ideation among the unmarried female migrant workers in urban cities in China. More attention should be paid to the mental health of the population.

Keywords

  • Induced abortion
  • Suicidal ideation
  • Female migrant workers
  • Mental health

Background

As one of the hallmarks for global development, migration is and will continue to be associated with health issues. Internationally, migration is a process during which a person moves from one cultural setting to another [1], while internal migration usually occurs within a nation, and in China is characterized by the overwhelming rural-to-urban migration. It was estimated that there were 73 million migrants living in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region in the early 2016 [2]. In China, the number tripled, corresponding to 247 million internal migrants living in the places different from their household registration, and the number will further increase to over 2 billion by 2020 [3]. Unlike most permanent residents who can enjoy the benefit of local public services and welfare systems, migrants, classified as temporary residents, generally experience disparities in their living conditions, including the exclusion from access to some medical services and social benefits [4], and experienced stigma and discrimination [5].

Between January and May 2010, twelve young migrants working in Foxconn Technology Group in Guangzhou attempted suicide among whom 10 died [6, 7], arousing public attention to the poor mental health of the migrant workers in China. It was reported that younger age (18–35 years) was a risk factor while male gender and being married were protective factors for depression and anxiety disorders in the general population [810], and therefore unmarried female migrant workers of reproductive age might be under higher risk for developing mental health problems including suicidal ideation, which is defined as any self-reported thoughts of engaging in suicide-related behavior [11]. Although not sharing exactly the same risk factors as suicide, suicidal ideation is an established risk factor for suicide [12] which is the second leading cause of death among 15–29 year olds globally [13], and different from Western countries where the suicide mortality is constantly higher in males, in China the gender difference in suicide rate is not salient despite a shift towards the Western trend over time, and more suicidal attempts occur among females especially in rural areas [14]. Several studies reported higher risk for suicidal thoughts and attempts among migrant workers [15, 16], while others suggested similar risks compared to urban dwellers [10]. In a study conducted among rural young Chinese, the prevalence of serious past-year suicidal ideation was 1.3% among the migrant group and 3.0% among the non-migrant group [17]. Another one reported 9.2% past-year suicidal ideation among women of reproductive age working in entertainment venues in the capital city of one eastern Chinese province [18]. However, there is still a dearth of data on unmarried female migrant workers in China.

Nowadays, females account for nearly half of the whole internal migrant group in China, and the number is steadily growing [19]. Most of them are unmarried women of reproductive age. Disparities between non-migrants and migrants in reproductive and maternal health, as well as family planning services accessibility result in higher incidences of induced abortion, caesarean section, and pregnancy complications [20]. As was reported, in China, nearly 15% of the unmarried female migrants had an unwanted pregnancy and 95% of them had an abortion [21, 22], among whom half had repeated abortions [23]. These self-reported data may be an underestimate since premarital sex is generally regarded as shameful in the sexually conservative Chinese culture. Fetal loss is a traumatic experience and studies have shown that abortion was correlated with increased risk for subsequent mental disorders [2426], and suicidal behaviors [27, 28]. Although induced abortion-related suicidality among unmarried female migrant workers was rarely reported, the risk might increase as a result of physical impairment following abortion, and multiple psychosocial stresses which could be either innate in the population or related to induced abortion [29].

As there were few studies targeting the mental health of unmarried female migrant workers, our study aimed to understand the mental health of the population in big cities in China. We examined the association between lifetime induced abortion and suicidal ideation during the past year, and further explored whether the association, if any, varied between different subgroups. We hypothesize that (1) lifetime induced abortion was positively associated with past-year suicidal ideation; (2) the association between induced abortion and suicidal ideation differed by age group, hometown, education attainment, length of stay in the city, attitude towards premarital pregnancy, and the presence of depression and anxiety disorders.

Methods

Design and study population

The study was conducted in Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou, three of the largest metropolitan cities attracting a great number of migrants in China. Approximately 20 million migrants in China are currently residing in these three cities [3032]. The eligible criteria for the study subjects were unmarried females aged over 18 years and working in the place different from their household registration as migrants. The exclusion criterion was the inability to read or answer questions (e.g., dementia, difficulties with the language).

Between June 2015 and March 2016, we recruited participants using the convenient sampling method. Assuming a prevalence of past-year suicidal ideation in rural-to-urban female migrant workers of 8% [18, 33, 34], using α of 0.05, and a relative error for sampling of 0.1, we calculated a required sample size of 5500 to allow for the non-response rate of 20%. In the first stage, we selected two factories from each city where female migrants congregated with the assistance of the officials from the local centers for disease control and prevention (CDC). In the second stage, we selected individuals compatible with the inclusion criteria from each factory with the help of the factory managers.

We conducted the survey with self-administrated questionnaires. We trained human resources specialists of the factories and senior undergraduate medical students from each city as investigators prior to the investigation. Each interview lasted approximately 30 min in a private room of each factory. We compensated each participant with 30 RMB ($4–5 USD) in cash after they completed the questionnaire. The Ethics Committee approved the survey. We obtained written informed consent from all the participants following a clarification of the objectives and the procedure of the study, as well as the potential risks and benefits of participation before enrolling the participants.

Instruments and measures

Psychosocial variables

Psychosocial information included behavioral variables, attitudes toward premarital pregnancy and multiple abortion, as well as self-esteem and perceived loneliness. Behavioral variables included tobacco use, alcohol assumption and daily internet use within the past month which were assessed by four-point Likert scales questions asking the frequency of these behaviors (1 = never, 4 = everyday). We only considered subjects as non-smokers or non-drinkers if their answer was ‘never’ to the corresponding questions while we considered subjects as daily internet users if their answer was ‘every day’. We assessed the attitudes towards premarital pregnancy and multiple abortion with two questions: “Do you agree with premarital pregnancy” and “Do you agree with multiple induced abortion”, with the answers ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). We considered subjects holding negative attitude towards premarital pregnancy or multiple induced abortion if their corresponding answers were “disagree or strongly disagree”, and other answers (“strongly agree, agree or doesn’t matter”) as having positive attitude. We measured self-esteem using the 10-item, Likert-type Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale [35, 36]. After reversing the negative items, we calculated the total score with a higher score indicating higher self-esteem (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.772; range 0–30). We further categorized the subjects into high- and low-level self-esteem groups with the cutoff point of 15 [37]. We measured the inner feeling of loneliness and the experience of human relationships with the 8-item ULS-8 Scale [38], a simplified version of the 20-item UCLA Loneliness Scale [39, 40]. Each item ranged from 1 (never) to 4 (most of the time), with a higher summed score indicating a higher level of loneliness (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.694; range 8–32). We defined the group with significant loneliness as those with a total score greater than 17, which was the 75th percentile in our study.

Mental disorder variables

We measured depressive symptoms using the 20-item Likert-type Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) [41, 42]. A higher summed score indicated higher depression severity (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.865; range 0–60). According to the literature, we adopted 20 as the diagnosis value [43]. We measured anxiety with the 7-item Likert-scale Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) [44, 45], with a higher summed score indicating more severe generalized anxiety (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.866; range 0–21). We defined those with the total score greater than 10 to be the anxiety group [44].

Reproductive health

For the reproductive health of the subjects, we asked three questions (Have you had premarital sex? Have you had unplanned pregnancy? Have you had the experience of induced abortion?). Subjects gave the response with “yes = 1” or “no = 0” for each question.

Suicidality

We measured suicidal ideation, suicidal plan and suicidal attempt during the past year using the questions “Have you ever.. . thought about killing yourself?”; “.. . made plans to kill yourself? ”; and “.. . failed to kill yourself?” within the past year with the response “yes = 1” and “no = 0” for each question. For this study, we focused on the association between induced abortion and suicidal ideation due to heterogeneity in the risk factors across the spectrum of suicidality.

Statistical analysis

The quality of data was ensured by the double entry process. Cases with any missing data were excluded from the analysis. We used Chi-Square test to examine the association between each potential covariate with both the experience of induced abortion and past-year suicidal ideation as binary variables. Then using logistic regression analyses, we regressed each subject’s past-year suicidal ideation against induced abortion, after adjusting for covariates in a hierarchical manner. We included demographic covariates in model 1, with extra inclusion of psychosocial covariates in model 2, and added depression and anxiety disorders in model 3. We selected the covariates based on either literature or Chi-square test result with p-value < 0.1. We calculated the Nagelkerke / Cragg & Uhler’s pseudo R-squared as a comparison of model fit [46].

To further explore whether the association between induced abortion and past-year suicidal ideation differed among different groups, we performed subgroup analyses by age group, hometown, education attainment, length of stay in the city, attitude towards premarital pregnancy, the presence of clinically significant anxiety disorders and depression. Each time we added an interaction term to model 3 and reported the corresponding Odds ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI), as well as the p-value for overall interaction effect.

Results

A total of 5578 unmarried female migrant workers agreed to participate in the study, with 5332 (95.6%) meeting the inclusion criteria and of them, 5115 (95.9%) completed the survey. Characteristics of the subjects were summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 23.3 ± 2.8 years (range = 18–35). Over 15% experienced induced abortion and over 8 % reported suicidal ideation during the past year.
Table 1

Characteristics of the study subjects (N = 5115)

Variables

n

%

City

 Shanghai

2255

44.1

 Beijing

1638

32.0

 Guangzhou

1222

23.9

Age (years)

  < 20

496

9.7

 20–25

3353

65.6

  > 25

1266

24.8

Highest education

 Middle school or below

1465

28.6

 Senior high school

3233

63.2

 College degree or above

417

8.2

Income (RMB-yuan)

  < 3200

1869

36.5

 3200–4800

3099

60.6

  > 4800

147

2.9

Hometown

 Urban

1253

24.5

 Rural

3862

75.5

Years in the working place

  < 1

2237

43.7

 1–5

611

12.0

  > 5

2267

44.3

Tobacco use-past month

 No

4846

94.7

 Yes

269

5.3

Alcohol use-past month

 No

4133

80.8

 Yes

982

19.2

Daily Internet use-past month

 No

4555

89.1

 Yes

560

10.9

Attitude toward premarital pregnancy

 Positive

1046

20.4

 Negative

4069

79.6

Attitude toward multiple induced abortion

 Positive

156

3.0

 Negative

4959

97.0

Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale

 High self-esteem (score > =15)

4514

88.3

 Low self-esteem (score < 15)

601

11.7

GAD-anxiety

 Non-anxiety group (score < 10)

4506

88.1

 Anxiety group (score > =10)

609

11.9

CESD-depression

 Non-depression group (score < 20)

3615

70.7

 Depression group (score > =20)

1500

29.3

Have had premarital sex

 No

2142

41.9

 Yes

2973

58.1

Have had unplanned pregnancy

 No

4296

84.0

 Yes

819

16.0

Have had induced abortion

 No

4323

84.5

 Yes

792

15.5

Have had suicidal ideation-past year

 No

4697

91.8

 Yes

418

8.2

Have had suicidal plan-past year

 No

5032

98.4

 Yes

83

1.6

Have had suicidal attempt-past year

 No

5064

99.0

 Yes

51

1.0

Variables

Mean

Std.

Age

23.27

2.78

Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale

18.79

3.77

UCLS Loneliness Scale

4.46

3.94

GAD-anxiety

14.84

3.99

CESD-depression

16.75

9.35

The characteristics of the subjects with and without induced abortion, with and without past-year suicidal ideation were summarized in Table 2. Compared to those without induced abortion, those with the experience were more likely to be aged > 25, have lower education level but higher income, come from urban areas, have shorter stay in the working place, more likely to smoke, drink alcohol and surf the internet every day during the past month, have more positive attitude towards premarital pregnancy and multiple induced abortion, more likely to have low self-esteem and suicidal ideation during the past year. Compared to those without suicidal ideation, suicide ideators were more likely to have lower education and shorter stay in the working place, less likely to smoke but more likely to drink alcohol and report daily internet use, have more positive attitude towards premarital pregnancy and multiple induced abortion, more likely to have low self-esteem and experience loneliness, anxiety and depression, and have past experience of induced abortion.
Table 2

Characteristics of the subjects with/without induced abortion, and with/without past-year suicidal ideation (N = 5115)

Variables

With induced abortion (n = 792)

Without induced abortion (n = 4323)

p-value

With suicidal ideation (n = 418)

Without suicidal ideation (n = 4697)

p-value

Demographic characteristics

Resident City

 Shanghai

344 (43.4%)

1911 (44.2%)

0.337

170 (40.7%)

2085 (44.4%)

0.292

 Beijing

243 (30.7%)

1395 (32.3%)

138 (33.0%)

1500 (31.9%)

 

 Guangzhou

205 (25.9%)

1017 (23.5%)

110 (26.3%)

1112 (23.7%)

 

Age (years%)

  < 20

52 (6.6%)

444 (10.3%)

0.004

49 (11.7%)

447 (9.5%)

0.220

 20–25

530 (66.9%)

2823 (65.3%)

 

260 (62.2%)

3093 (65.9%)

 

  > 25

210 (26.5%)

1056 (24.4%)

 

109 (26.1%)

1157 (24.6%)

 

Highest education

      

 Middle school or below

289 (36.5%)

1176 (27.2%)

< 0.001

155 (37.1%)

1310 (27.9%)

< 0.001

 Senior high school

451 (56.9%)

2782 (64.4%)

 

230 (55.0%)

3003 (63.9%)

 

 College degree or above

52 (6.6%)

365 (8.4%)

 

33 (7.9%)

384 (8.2%)

 

Income (RMB-yuan)

  < 3200

246 (31.1%)

1623 (37.5%)

< 0.001

168 (40.2%)

1701 (36.2%)

0.236

 3200–4800

506 (63.9%)

2593 (60.0%)

 

237 (56.7%)

2862 (60.9%)

 

  > 4800

40 (5.1%)

107 (2.5%)

 

13 (3.1%)

134 (2.9%)

 

Hometown

 Urban

218 (27.5%)

1035 (23.9%)

0.031

91 (21.8%)

1162 (24.7%)

0.176

 Rural

574 (72.5%)

3288 (76.1%)

 

327 (78.2%)

3535 (75.3%)

 

Years in the working place

  < 1

359 (45.3%)

1878 (43.4%)

0.101

217 (51.9%)

2020 (43.0%)

0.001

 1–5

107 (13.5%)

504 (11.7%)

 

52 (12.4%)

559 (11.9%)

 

  > 5

326 (41.2%)

1941 (44.9%)

 

149 (35.6%)

2118 (45.1%)

 

Psychosocial characteristics

Tobacco use-past month

 No

726 (91.7%)

4120 (95.3%)

< 0.001

403 (96.4%)

4443 (94.6%)

0.110

 Yes

66 (8.3%)

203 (4.7%)

 

15 (3.6%)

254 (5.4%)

 

Alcohol use-past month

      

 No

557 (70.3%)

3576 (82.7%)

< 0.001

306 (73.2%)

3827 (81.5%)

< 0.001

 Yes

235 (29.7%)

747 (17.3%)

 

112 (26.8%)

870 (18.5%)

 

Daily Internet use-past month

 No

696 (87.9%)

3859 (89.3%)

0.250

345 (82.5%)

4210 (89.6%)

< 0.001

 Yes

96 (12.1%)

464 (10.7%)

 

73 (17.5%)

487 (10.4%)

 

Attitude toward premarital pregnancy

      

 Positive

321 (40.5%)

725 (16.8%)

< 0.001

108 (25.8%)

938 (20.0%)

0.004

 Negative

471 (59.5%)

3598 (83.2%)

 

310 (74.2%)

3759 (80.0%)

 

Attitude toward multiple induced abortion

 Positive

47 (5.9%)

109 (2.5%)

< 0.001

23 (5.5%)

133 (2.8%)

0.002

 Negative

745 (94.1%)

4214 (97.5%)

 

395 (94.5%)

4564 (97.2%)

 

Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale

 High self-esteem (score > =15)

679(85.7%)

3883 (89.8%)

0.017

310(74.2%)

4204(89.5%)

< 0.001

 Low self-esteem (score < 15)

113(14.3%)

440 (10.2%)

108(25.8%)

493(10.5%)

 

UCLS Loneliness Scale

 Low loneliness (score < =17%)

598 (75.5%)

3287 (76.0%)

0.748

196 (46.9%)

3689 (78.5%)

< 0.001

 High loneliness (score > 17)

194 (24.5%)

1036 (24.0%)

 

222 (53.1%)

1008 (21.5%)

 

Mental disorders

GAD-anxiety

 Non-anxiety group (score < 10)

701 (88.5%)

3805 (88.0%)

0.694

333 (79.7%)

4173 (88.8%)

< 0.001

 Anxiety group (score > =10)

91 (11.5%)

518 (12.0%)

 

85 (20.3%)

524 (11.2%)

 

CESD-depression

 Non-depression group (score < 20)

494 (62.4%)

2757 (63.8%)

0.451

177 (42.3%)

3074 (65.4%)

< 0.001

 Depression group (score > =20)

298 (37.6%)

1566 (36.2%)

 

241 (57.7%)

1623 (34.6%)

 

Induced abortion

 No

310 (74.2%)

4013 (85.4%)

< 0.001

 Yes

 

108 (25.8%)

684 (14.6%)

 

Suicidal ideation-past year

 No

684 (86.4%)

4013 (92.8%)

< 0.001

 Yes

108 (13.6%)

310 (7.2%)

 

 
The association between induced abortion and suicidal ideation was summarized in Table 3. Induced abortion was associated with nearly twice the odds of having suicidal ideation across three models, with slight reduction in the effect size with extra adjustment of psychosocial covariates in model 2, and nearly no change with further adjustment of depression and anxiety in model 3. In model 3, higher education, longer stay in the working place and past-month smoking were associated with decreased, while past-month alcohol drinking and daily internet use, lower self-esteem, loneliness, depression and induced abortion with increased odds of suicidal ideation. The Nagelkerke R2 was 1.5% in the binary model for induced abortion, with the greatest increase (10.8%) with the introduction of psychosocial covariates.
Table 3

Multiple logistic regression of past-year suicidal ideation associated with induced abortion (N = 5115)

Variables

Suicidal ideation-past year

OR (95% CI)

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Demographic characteristics

Age (years)

  < 20

1

1

1

 20–25

0.77(0.55–1.06)

0.77(0.55–1.08)

0.74(0.53–1.05)

  > 25

0.93(0.65–1.34)

0.96(0.66–1.41)

0.96(0.65–1.41)

Highest education

 Middle school or below

1

1

1

 Senior high school

0.66(0.54–0.83)**

0.70(0.56-0.88)**

0.70(0.56-0.88)**

 College degree or above

0.73(0.49–1.08)

0.78 (0.51–1.19)

0.79(0.52–1.21)

Years in the working place

  < 1

1

1

1

 1–5

0.82(0.60–1.13)

0.87(0.62–1.21)

0.85(0.61–1.19)

  > 5

0.66(0.53–0.82)**

0.60(0.47-0.75)**

0.58(0.46-0.73)**

Psychosocial characteristics

Tobacco use-past month

 No

 

1

1

 Yes

 

0.22(0.12–0.39)**

0.21(0.12-0.38)**

Alcohol use-past month

 No

 

1

1

 Yes

 

1.63(1.25–2.13)**

1.64(1.25-2.14)**

Daily Internet use-past month

 No

 

1

1

 Yes

 

1.64 (1.21–2.22)**

1.63(1.20-2.21)**

Attitude toward premarital pregnancy

 Positive

 

1

1

 Negative

 

0.89(0.69–1.16)

0.88(0.68–1.14)

Attitude toward multiple induced abortion

 Positive

 

1

1

 Negative

 

0.71(0.43–1.18)

0.75(0.45–1.24)

Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale

 High self-esteem (score > =15)

 

1

1

 Low self-esteem (score < 15)

 

1.95(1.49–2.55)**

1.85(1.39-2.45)**

UCLS Loneliness Scale

 Low loneliness (score < =17)

 

1

1

 High loneliness (score > 17)

 

3.64(2.92–4.53)**

3.17(2.49-4.04)**

Mental disorders

GAD-anxiety

 Non-anxiety (score < 10)

  

1

 Anxiety (score > =10)

  

0.85(0.62–1.16)

CESD-depression

 Non-depression (score < 20)

  

1

 Depression (score > =20)

  

1.50(1.16–1.93)**

Induced abortion

 No

1

1

1

 Yes

1.97(1.56–2.50)**

1.89(1.46-2.45)**

1.89(1.46-2.44)**

Nagelkerke R Square

0.028

0.136

0.140

**P < 0.05

The results for our subgroup analyses were summarized in Table 4. The association between induced abortion and suicidal ideation were significant among those aged > 20 with larger effect among those aged > 25, those with a length of stay of < 1 year or > 5 years with larger effect in the latter, and in the non-anxiety group and non-depression group. We did not find different effect associations by hometown, education level or attitude towards premarital pregnancy.
Table 4

Subgroup analyses of past-year suicidal ideation associated with induced abortion (N = 5115)

Variables

n

ORa

95% CI

p-value for interaction

Age (years)

  < 20

496 (9.7%)

0.75

0.27–2.11

0.005

 20–25

3353 (65.6%)

1.58

1.14–2.19

 

  > 25

1266 (24.8%)

3.37

2.16–5.28

 

Hometown

 Urban

1253 (24.5%)

1.52

0.90–2.57

0.351

 Rural

3862 (75.5%)

2.01

1.51–2.69

 

Highest education

 Middle school or below

1465 (28.6%)

1.75

1.17–2.62

0.891

 Senior high school

3233 (63.2%)

1.98

1.40–2.79

 

 College degree or above

417 (8.2%)

2.03

0.80–5.18

 

Years in the working place

  < 1

2237 (43.7%)

1.54

1.06–2.25

0.008

 1–5

611 (12.0%)

0.96

0.46–1.99

 

  > 5

2267 (44.3%)

2.98

2.02–4.39

 

Attitude toward premarital pregnancy

 Positive

1046 (20.4%)

1.50

0.97–2.31

0.195

 Negative

4069 (79.6%)

2.14

1.56–2.92

 

GAD-anxiety

 Non-anxiety (score < 10)

4506 (88.1%)

2.28

1.74–3.00

0.001

 Anxiety (score > =10)

609 (11.9%)

0.64

0.31–1.30

 

CESD-depression

 Non-depression (score < 20)

3615 (70.7%)

2.94

2.08–4.15

< 0.001

 Depression (score > =20)

1500 (29.3%)

1.20

0.83–1.74

 

aAdjusting for all the other covariates in model 3

Discussion

To our knowledge, this was the first study targeting specifically at the association between induced abortion and suicidal ideation among unmarried female migrant populations working in urban cities in China, who are an important workforce in the national urbanization process but have received insufficient attention with regards to their mental health. We found nearly twice the odds of past-year suicidal ideation associated with the experience of induced abortion, which was independent of demographic, psychosocial and mental disorder characteristics. The association was stronger among those aged over 25, having stayed in the working place for over 5 years, and without depression or anxiety disorders.

The prevalence of past-year suicidal ideation in our subjects, 8.2%, was higher than 6.5% among rural female populations aged 16–34 [33], the lifetime suicidal ideation of 3.9% among the general population [47] and 5.8% among the urban dwellers of similar age range in China [10]. It is much higher than the 2.8% lifetime suicidal ideation prevalence reported among male migrant workers in railway construction site in China [48]. Higher rate of suicide and suicide attempt have been reported among migrants in Europe despite large heterogeneity for different migrant groups [1, 49]. Nearly 30 % of our study subjects experienced depression, higher than that reported in other studies of Chinese migrant workers [17, 50, 51], and the prevalence of anxiety was similar to previous report [50].

The positive association between induced abortion and suicidal ideation was consistent with previous studies. The first cohort study using national registry data in Finland reported over 3 times increased risk of suicide following induced abortion compared with the general population, which corresponded to nearly 6 times the risk compared to birth givers [52], and the higher risk even persists until now since the initiation of the Current Care Guideline in Finland which highlights monitoring the mental disorders of women during the post-termination window [53]. Positive associations between suicidal ideation and induced abortion were reported in longitudinal studies [54, 55]. In China, only one study reported no effect of abortion on suicidal ideation but negative effect on suicide acceptability among females aged 15–34 in rural areas [56]. Our study adds to the evidence of induced abortion-suicidality association and highlights the mental health issues among unmarried female migrant workers.

In our hierarchical analyses, induced abortion was associated with increased odds for suicidal ideation in all of the models. It was reported that migrant population in China have slight advantage in mental well-being than the general population [9, 17] but they are characterized by lower level of medical service utilization especially mental health services [51]. With little knowledge of contraception, and further complicated by the one-child policy implemented since 1978, as well as the differentiated maternal health care practiced in urban cities toward local dwellers and migrant females, unplanned pregnancies predominantly end up with induced abortion among unmarried migrant female workers. In our data, the majority (96.9%) of those having unplanned pregnancy underwent induced abortion. Induced abortion might be a natural choice for them but the consequence of abortion might have more lasting and complex impact on their emotion and mental well-being. The current maternal care system in urban cities can only trace reported pregnancy with a complete records of medical examination during pregnancy, which is less capable of capturing induced abortion and managing the post-termination health issues of the unmarried female population experienced with induced abortion.

In the final model, induced abortion and other behavioral and psychosocial characteristics overtook depression with relation to suicidal ideation, and anxiety was no longer a significant predictor. Also contrary to western studies [54, 55, 57], we did not find associations between induced abortion and either depression or anxiety, which suggested some distinct links between induced abortion and suicidality among our population. Based on some overlapping characteristics of the subjects with induced abortion and suicidal ideation shown in our binary analyses(i.e., lower education, shorter stay in the working place, more alcohol consumption and internet use, more tolerant attitude towards primatial sex and multiple abortion, more likely to have low self-esteem), we could portrait a group of subjects who were less behaviorally strict but not necessarily more depressed or disturbed by mental disorders, and had lower level of social support which might in turn drive them to seek sensational or other problem behaviors. The link between the suicidal ideation and induced abortion among this population may not be mediated by depression, but more likely, an indication of some personality and temperament. Social support may play an important role here since the decision to continue or to give up the birth might be directly related to the perceived social support [58], and interpersonal connectedness is one of the core aspects of suicidality [59, 60]. Among common theories in the explanation between abortion and mental distress [55], stress coping may play an essential role here due to the loose link between abortion and depression and anxiety, but the high prevalence of risky behaviors which may signify mal-coping strategies.

Despite that only 5.3% of the subjects reported tobacco use during the past month, the significant negative association between smoking and suicidal ideation warrant further research. Potential underreport of tobacco use could bias the association, or maybe smoking was regarded as a means for relieving the pressure among our subjects, which reduced their risk for suicidal ideation. The large increase in the Nagelkerke R2 (10.8%) in model 2 highlights the psychosocial determinants of suicidality. In general, risk prediction for suicide is unsatisfactory [61], and the R2 of 14.0% in our final model was acceptable.

There seem to be stronger association between induced abortion and suicidal ideation with older age. It may be due to stronger emotional loss caused by fetal loss as age grows, or a manifestation of the accumulation of psychosocial stress overtime. Meanwhile, although longer stay in the working place was protective for suicidal ideation, the stronger association between abortion and suicidal ideation among those with longer stay is suggestive of the strengthening of some personality or propensity overtime. The stronger association among those without anxiety or depression further corroborates our inference that induced abortion was associated with suicidality independent of mental disorders among this population. Interestingly, among the anxiety group, induced abortion was associated with reduced odds of suicidal ideation despite the lack of power in revealing significance. A possible explanation might be that the termination was a relief to those unprepared mother-to-bes which reduced their psychological burdens.

Our results should be interpreted considering the following limitations. Above all, we cannot draw causal conclusions due to the cross-sectional design. However, suicidal ideation measured within the past year and induced abortion measured within lifetime partly reduced reversal causality. Second, the clustered convenient sampling method brings selection bias although it is the most common method used for recruiting migrant workers who are usually highly aggregated. Third, we did not discriminate between single-time abortion and multiple induced abortions, which may have different associations with suicidal ideation. Fourth, we did not measure potential confounders such as interpersonal violence, childhood experience, working environment, physical diseases and the experience of health seeking behavior, and we may have underestimated depression prevalence without asking antidepressant use. Fifth, we compared suicidal ideation between women with induced abortion and those without such experience most of whom we assumed to be never pregnant, but not ideally two groups of pregnant women with one experiencing induced abortion and the other delivering the baby. Nevertheless, the large sample size, the investigation in the three biggest cities in China with a wide geographic coverage, the structured questionnaire used across the three sites and the inclusion of a wide spectrum of covariates in the survey constituted the major strengths of our study.

Conclusions

Lifetime induced abortion was associated with nearly twice the odds for suicidal ideation during the past year among unmarried female migrant workers in metropolitan cities in China. An improvement of mental health of the population requires policy change, medical system support, enhanced communication between the service seekers and health care providers, and importantly, the establishment of an enabling environment to strengthen social support and facilitate help seeking behaviors of those less advantaged population.

Abbreviations

CDC: 

Center for Disease Control and Prevention

CESD: 

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale

CI: 

Confidence interval

GAD: 

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

OR: 

Odds ratio

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the study participants for their contribution. We thank the factories for helping us organize the survey.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71273174), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71673187) and the Shanghai Key Discipline Construction Project in Public Health (15GWZK1002).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the funding nature (National Natural Science Foundation of China) but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

RL and YC conceived the study design. XQJ, YW, ZZW and QMS performed the data collection. MYL and YC analyzed the data with the suggestions from other authors. MYL, XQJ, RL and YC wrote the manuscript. YW, ZZW and QMS contributed a lot to the discussion and revision of the manuscript. RL and YC supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The proposal of the study was reviewed and approved by the Chinese National Nature Science Fund Committee. The study was also approved by the Ethics Committee of School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. We obtained written informed consent from all the participants following a clarification the objectives and the procedure of the study, as well as the potential risks and benefits of participation before enrolling the participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, USA

References

  1. Lindert J, Schouler-Ocak M, Heinz A, Priebe S. Mental health, health care utilisation of migrants in Europe. Eur Psychiatry. 2008;23:14–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization. Migrant health in the European. Region. 2017. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-determinants/migration-and-health/migrant-health-in-the-european-region. Accessed 22 Auguest 2017.Google Scholar
  3. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the PRC. Report on China's migrant population development. China: Polulation Publishing House; 2016.Google Scholar
  4. Hesketh T, Ye XJ, Li L, Wang HM. Health status and access to health Care of Migrant Workers in China. Public Health Rep. 2008;123:189–97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Mcguire J, Li X, Wang B. Social stigma and quality of life among rural-to-urban migrants in China: a comparison with their rural counterparts. World Health Popul. 2009;11:30–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lau JT, Cheng Y, Gu J, Zhou R, Yu C, Holroyd E, et al. Suicides in a mega-size factory in China: poor mental health among young migrant workers in China. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69:526.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ngai P, Chan J. Global capital, the state, and Chinese workers the Foxconn experience. Modern China. 2012;38:383–410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Breslau J, Borges G, Tancredi D, Saito N, Kravitz R, Hinton L, et al. Migration from Mexico to the United States and subsequent risk for depressive and anxiety disorders: a cross-national study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68:428–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Li J, Chang SS, Yip PSF, Li J, Jordan LP, Tang Y, et al. Mental wellbeing amongst younger and older migrant workers in comparison to their urban counterparts in Guangzhou city. China: a cross-sectional study BMC public health. 2014;14:1280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Li L, Wang HM, Ye XJ, Jiang MM, Lou QY, Hesketh T. The mental health status of Chinese rural-urban migrant workers : comparison with permanent urban and rural dwellers. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42:716–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. O'Carroll PW, Berman AL, Maris RW, Moscicki EK, Tanney BL, Silverman MM, et al. Beyond the tower of babel: a nomenclature for suicidology. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1996;26:237–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. O'Connor RC. The integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behavior. Crisis. 2011;32:295–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. World Health Organization. Suicide data. 2017. http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/. Accessed 22 Augest 2017.Google Scholar
  14. Page A, Liu S, Gunnell D, Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Wang L, et al. Suicide by pesticide poisoning remains a priority for suicide prevention in China: analysis of national mortality trends 2006-2013. J Affect Disord. 2017;208:418–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carta MG, Bernal M, Hardoy MC, Haro-Abad JM. Migration and mental health in Europe (the state of the mental health in Europe working group: appendix 1). Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2005;1:13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kwan YK, Ip WC. Suicidality and migration among adolescents in Hong Kong. Death Stud. 2007;31:45–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dai J, Zhong BL, Xiang YT, Chiu HFK, Chan SSM, Yu X, et al. Internal migration, mental health, and suicidal behaviors in young rural Chinese. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50:621–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dong Y, Zhang H, Wang Y, Tan H, Xu S, Xia J, et al. Multiple abortions and sexually transmitted infections among young migrant women working in entertainment venues in China. Women Health. 2015;55:580–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Information Office of the State Council. Annual report on gender equality and Women's development in China 2008–2012. China: Social Sciences Academic Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  20. Keygnaert I, Ivanova O, Guieu A, Van Parys AS, Leye E, Roelens K. What is the evidence on the reduction of inequalities in accessibility and quality of maternal health care delivery for migrants? A review of the existing evidence in the WHO European region. 2016.Google Scholar
  21. He D, Zhou Y, Ji N, Wu S, Wang Z, Decat P, et al. Study on sexual and reproductive health behaviors of unmarried female migrants in China. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38:632–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Qian X, Tang S, Garner P. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion among unmarried women in China: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Zeng J, Zou G, Song X, Li L. Contraceptive practices and induced abortions status among internal migrant women in Guangzhou, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:552.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bellieni CV, Buonocore G. Abortion and subsequent mental health: review of the literature. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013;67:301–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Broen AN, Moum T, Bodtker AS, Ekeberg O. The course of mental health after miscarriage and induced abortion: a longitudinal, five-year follow-up study. BMC Med. 2005;3:18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Steinberg JR, Trussell J, Hall K, Guthrie K. Fatal flaws in a recent meta-analysis on abortion and mental health. Contraception. 2012;86:430–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Ridder EM. Abortion in young women and subsequent mental health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47:16–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mota NP, Burnett M, Sareen J. Associations between abortion, mental disorders, and suicidal behaviour in a nationally representative sample. Can J Psychiatr. 2010;55:239–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Fellmeth G, Paw MK, Wiladphaingern J, Charunwatthana P, Nosten FH, Mcgready R. Maternal suicide risk among refugees and migrants. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;134:223–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gao XL, McGrath C, Lin HC. Oral health status of rural-urban migrant children in South China. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011;21:58–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. National Baureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China. The sixth census data bulletin of shanghai in 2010. 2011. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rkpcgb/dfrkpcgb/201202/t20120228_30403.html. Accessed 22 Augest 2017.Google Scholar
  32. Xu T, Gong L, Wang H, Zhang R, Wang X, Kaime-Atterhog W. Epidemiology of unintentional injuries among children under six years old in floating and residential population in four communities in Beijing: a comparative study. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18:911–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dai J, Chiu HF, Conner KR, Chan SS, Hou ZJ, Yu X, et al. Suicidal ideation and attempts among rural Chinese aged 16-34 years--socio-demographic correlates in the context of a transforming China. J Affect Disord. 2011;130:438–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yan Z, Peng A, Zhang L. Study on psychosocial factors of suicide ideation among peasant workers in Guiyang City. Journal of Hygiene Research. 2009;38:571–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1965.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin CR, Thompson DR, Chan DS. An examination of the psychometric properties of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES) in Chinese acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Psychol Health Med. 2006;11:507–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Polat B, Orhan KS, Kesimli MC, Gorgulu Y, Ulusan M, Deger K. The effects of indwelling voice prosthesis on the quality of life, depressive symptoms, and self-esteem in patients with total laryngectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272:3431–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hays RD, MR DM. A short-form measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1987;51:69–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:472–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu CH, Yao G. Psychometric analysis of the short-form UCLA loneliness scale(ULS-8) in Taiwanese undergraduate students. Pers Individ Dif. 2008;44:1762–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychological Meas. 1977;1:385–401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Chin WY, Choi EP, Chan KT, Wong CK. The psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in Chinese primary care patients: factor structure, construct validity, reliability, Sensitivity and Responsiveness. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0135131.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Gemma V, Forero CG, Gabriela B, Jordi A. Screening for depression in the general population with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D): a systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0155431.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1092–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. He XY, Li CB, Jie Q, Cui H, Wu WY. Reliability and validity of a generalized anxiety disorder scale in general hospital outpatient. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2010;22:200–3.Google Scholar
  46. UCLA, Institute for Digital Research and Education. FAQ: what are pseudo r-SQUAREDS? 2011. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/other/mult-pkg/faq/general/faq-what-are-pseudo-r-squareds/. Accessed 22 Augest 2017.Google Scholar
  47. Cao X, Zhong B, Xiang Y, Ungvari GS, Lai KYC, Chiu HFK, et al. Prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in the general population of China: a meta-analysis. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2015;49:296–308.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Sun YH, Zhou JB, Wang B. Survey of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in the migrant workers in railway construction. Chinese Prevention Medicine. 2008;9:334–8.Google Scholar
  49. Garssen MJ, Hoogenboezem J, Kerkhof AJ. Suicide among migrant populations and native Dutch in the Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006;150:2143–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang Z, Wang L, Jing J, Hu C. Prevalence of mental disorders in migrants compared with original residents and local residents in Ningxia. China BMC psychiatry. 2016;16:366.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wei Z, Hu C, Wei X, Yang H, Shu M, Liu T. Service utilization for mental problems in a metropolitan migrant population in China. Psychiatr Serv. 2013;64:645–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Gissler M, Hemminki E, Lonnqvist J. Suicides after pregnancy in Finland, 1987-94: register linkage study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1996;313:1431–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Gissler M, Karalis E, Ulander VM. Decreased suicide rate after induced abortion, after the current care guidelines in Finland 1987-2012. Scandinavian journal of public health. 2015;43:99–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Boden JM. Abortion and mental health disorders: evidence from a 30-year longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193:444–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sullins DP. Abortion, substance abuse and mental health in early adulthood: thirteen-year longitudinal evidence from the United States. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang J, Sun L. Suicide ideation and acceptability among females aged 15 to 34 years in rural China. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014;202:161–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Pedersen W. Abortion and depression: a population-based longitudinal study of young women. Scandinavian journal of public health. 2008;36:424–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Mantovani N, Thomas H. Choosing motherhood: the complexities of pregnancy decision-making among young black women 'looked after' by the state. Midwifery. 2014;30:72–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Joiner T. Why people die by suicide. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  60. Orden KAV, Witte TK, Cukrowicz KC, Braithwaite S, Selby EA, Jr TEJ. The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol Rev. 2010;117:575–600.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Large M, Kaneson M, Myles N, Myles H, Gunaratne P, Ryan C. Meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies of suicide risk assessment among psychiatric patients: heterogeneity in results and lack of improvement over time. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0156322.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement