Skip to main content
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Expanded HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation in communities in New South Wales, Australia (EPIC-NSW): design of an open label, single arm implementation trial

A Correction to this article was published on 28 February 2018

This article has been updated



The New South Wales (NSW) HIV Strategy 2016–2020 aims for the virtual elimination of HIV transmission in NSW, Australia, by 2020. Despite high and increasing levels of HIV testing and treatment since 2012, the annual number of HIV diagnoses in NSW has remained generally unchanged. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing HIV infection among gay and bisexual men (GBM) when taken appropriately. However, there have been no population-level studies that evaluate the impact of rapid PrEP scale-up in high-risk GBM. Expanded PrEP Implementation in Communities in NSW (EPIC-NSW) is a population-level evaluation of the rapid, targeted roll-out of PrEP to high-risk individuals.


EPIC-NSW, is an open-label, single-arm, multi-centre prospective observational study of PrEP implementation and impact. Over 20 public and private clinics across urban and regional areas in NSW have participated in the rapid roll-out of PrEP, supported by strong community mobilization and PrEP promotion. The study began on 1 March 2016, aiming to enroll at least 3700 HIV negative people at high risk of HIV. This estimate took into consideration criteria for PrEP prescription in people at high risk for acquiring HIV as defined in the NSW PrEP guidelines. Study participants receive once daily co-formulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) and are followed for up to 24 months. Follow-up includes: testing for HIV at 1 month, HIV and other sexually transmissible infections three-monthly, HCV annually and monitoring of renal function six-monthly. Optional online behavioural surveys are conducted quarterly. The co-primary endpoints are (i) HIV diagnoses and incidence in the cohort and (ii) HIV diagnoses in NSW.


EPIC-NSW is a population-based PrEP implementation trial which targets the entire estimated population of GBM at high risk for HIV infection in NSW. It will provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the population impact of PrEP on a concentrated HIV epidemic.

Trial registration (identifying number NCT02870790; registration date 14 August 2016), pre-results stage.

Peer Review reports


In New South Wales (NSW), Australia, research findings in HIV treatment as prevention [1] were followed in 2012 by a state-wide HIV strategy that had an over-arching aim of working towards the virtual elimination of HIV by 2020 [2]. In response to widespread implementation of policy actions directed towards HIV treatment as prevention [3], HIV testing rates and ART coverage among people diagnosed with HIV have increased considerably. By 2015, an estimated 93% of people with HIV in NSW were diagnosed; 89.3% of those diagnosed were on treatment, of which 91.3% had suppressed viral load over the preceding 12 months [4,5,6]. However, by the end of 2015, new HIV diagnoses in NSW had not declined substantially, and more than 80% of diagnoses continued to be in gay and bisexual men (GBM) [7]. Undiagnosed, and thus untreated, HIV infections among GBM [8], combined with increasing levels of condomless anal intercourse with casual partners [9], continued to drive the HIV epidemic despite very substantial increases in HIV testing and treatment. In order to achieve a significant reduction in new HIV diagnoses, additional strategies were required. In this context, the NSW HIV Strategy 2016–2020 proposed the population-level roll-out of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), in combination with strengthening condom use, testing, and treatment, in order to move forward towards the ambitious goal of virtually eliminating HIV transmission by 2020 [10].

PrEP, in the form of combined tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (TDF) and emtricitabine 200 mg (FTC), is effective for primary HIV prevention [11,12,13]. TDF/FTC has a favorable safety profile [14] and effectively penetrates the anorectal mucosa [15,16,17], which makes it an ideal prophylactic agent for GBM. PrEP efficacy is closely related to adherence [14], and adherence has been higher in people who are well-informed about HIV and PrEP [12, 13, 18]. TDF/FTC is now recommended as PrEP for people at high risk of HIV acquisition in national or regional guidelines in the US, Europe and Australia [19,20,21], as well as by the WHO guidelines globally [22].

At the time when EPIC-NSW began recruitment in March 2016, TDF/FTC as PrEP was not approved by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) [23]. The first guidance for PrEP prescribing, which became available in NSW in October 2014 (formally published in 2016 [24]), defined the eligibility for PrEP in a PrEP demonstration project PRELUDE [25]. Funded by the NSW Government, PRELUDE provided access to PrEP to about 300 individuals, predominately GBM from November 2014–November 2016 [25]. However, PrEP demand rapidly surpassed the PRELUDE project’s capacity. Ongoing PrEP research in NSW [25,26,27], PrEP guidelines [24] and the new NSW HIV Strategy 2016–2020 [10] provided the framework for a population-level implementation project “Expanded PrEP Implementation in Communities in NSW”(EPIC-NSW).

While PrEP implementation among GBM has been in various stages of roll-out in other countries (e.g., in the US and France), EPIC-NSW is novel in being a hybrid research and implementation project targeting PrEP to all people at high risk of HIV infection in NSW, and measuring the public health benefit of this program with respect to reduction in HIV transmissions in the state.

This study protocol describes the population-level introduction of PrEP in NSW through a public health intervention, which is widely supported across the spectrum of researchers, clinicians, community organisations, and government policymakers.

Methods / design


EPIC-NSW aims to evaluate the population-level impact of the rapid roll-out of PrEP in individuals at high risk for HIV and to measure the impact on HIV incidence among GBM in NSW.

Study design

EPIC-NSW is a prospective observational study of PrEP roll-out, implementation and impact. It is an open-label, single-arm, multi-centre trial, undertaken by a multidisciplinary team led by the Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney. The target population is predominantly GBM at high risk of HIV acquisition through sexual contact. However, other high risk individuals who are eligible for PrEP under the NSW PrEP guidelines can also enrol in the study (see Table 1).

Table 1 Risk criteria for participation in the EPIC-NSW trial

All participants are advised to take daily TDF/FTC and attend study visits as per the schedule presented in Table 2. Follow-up includes testing for HIV at month one, for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV every 3 months, and for hepatitis C annually. Renal function tests are conducted at baseline, at 3months after enrolment, and every 6 months thereafter. Participants are also invited to join the optional study components: (i) self-administered online surveys of behaviour and medication adherence (at baseline and quarterly thereafter) and (ii) data linkage with the Australian Government and state agency health and disease-related registries approved by the NSW Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee. The planned enrolment is a minimum of 3700 participants. Enrolment started on 1 March 2016. The project anticipates a total of 7400 person-years (PY) of follow-up on PrEP (up to 2 years of follow-up per person). To evaluate the uptake and impact of PrEP on the HIV epidemic in NSW, EPIC-NSW utilizes extraction of routinely collected data from electronic records maintained in clinical patient management systems across all sites using data extraction methods set up by the Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance (ACCESS study) [28].

Table 2 EPIC-NSW study flowchart


We estimated the number of GBM at high risk of HIV acquisition using data available by the end of 2014. The number of males living in NSW who were aged 16–69 (n1 = 2,411,288) was derived from the Australian Bureau of Statistics [29]. According to the nationally representative Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships (ASHR2, 2013), 2.3% of 16 to 69 year-old male respondents in NSW self-identified as gay and 81.9% of these men had been sexually active in the last year [30] (n2 = n1*0.023*0.819 = 45,422 sexually active gay men in NSW). ASHR2 participants who identified as bisexual were not included in these estimates, because these men were considered much less likely to discuss their homosexual behaviour with clinicians and, ultimately, to be identified as candidates for PrEP assessment. After excluding HIV positive GBM (estimated n3 = 6550 [31]), the remaining men (n4= n2- n3=38,872) represented sexually active men in NSW identifying as gay and at risk of acquiring HIV.

The database of the 2014 Sydney Gay Community Periodic Survey (SGCPS), an annual survey of behaviour among gay community engaged GBM in NSW [32], was used to determine the proportion of GBM at high risk of acquiring HIV who would be eligible for PrEP according to the NSW PrEP guidelines ([24]. Men were considered to be high risk if they reported at least one of the four high-risk behavioural eligibility criteria in the NSW PrEP guidelines. These were related to being a regular partner of an HIV-infected man without HIV viral load suppression, having receptive condomless anal intercourse (CLAI) with casual partners, reporting a recent anal STI diagnosis or syphilis, or methamphetamine use. (Table 1). The SGCPS indicator of having had within the preceding 6 months, ten or more casual partners was used as a proxy indicator for on-going sustained risk within the next 3 months. In total, 8.6% of HIV negative or HIV status unknown 16–69 year-old GBM reported at least one of these criteria. We assumed this proportion to be generalizable to all gay-identifying men in the population, and applied it to the number of sexually active gay-identifying men at risk for HIV in NSW to calculate the minimum number of men eligible for PrEP in NSW (N = n4*0.086 = 3343). We recognise that the inclusion in the estimate only of men reporting at least ten casual partners in the previous six-month period is a strict definition of those likely to have on-going risk, and that some men who have had fewer casual partners would also meet the criteria for PrEP eligibility in NSW. Allowing for loss to follow up, the study team considered that enrolling 3700 would represent a sufficiently high proportion of those truly at high risk of HIV infection at the time when PrEP use was not high (recent PrEP use was reported by just 4% of non-HIV-positive men in the 2016 SGCPS [9]). Additionally, it was considered that target enrolment of 3700 participants within existing sexual health services was feasible.

The previously conducted  Australian Health in Men Study found that each of the four high-risk factors were associated with an HIV incidence of above 1.8 per 100 person years [21]. Assuming a similar baseline HIV incidence in the EPIC-NSW cohort, a sample of 3700 participants, with 80% retention over the course of one year, will have 99.2% power to detect a 50% reduction in HIV incidence during the course of the first year on PrEP and 100% power to detect an 84% reduction in HIV incidence (as in European randomised trials of high-risk gay men on PrEP [12, 13]).

Study medication

All participants receive sufficient supply of daily oral TDF/FTC for self-administration until the next scheduled follow-up visit. A 2000 person-year (PY) supply of TDF/FTC was provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc., and 5400 PY of generic TDF/FTC equivalent were purchased from Mylan Laboratories Ltd. The procurement process was competitive and occurred within a framework for ensuring safety and security of the supply chain, and the quality and bioequivalence of the generic TDF/FTC with Truvada®. Participants’ ongoing access to PrEP after study completion will be facilitated by clinicians at their last study visit.

Study eligibility

Eligibility for this study is guided by the NSW Health guideline on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis of HIV with Antiretroviral Medications. To be eligible, participants must be aged 18 years or over, live or visit NSW regularly enough to be able to attend clinics for follow-up assessments, be documented as HIV negative at enrolment or within 7 days of starting PrEP, and be at high and ongoing risk of acquiring HIV through sexual exposure as established by the behavioural risk criteria (see Table 1). Excluded from participation are individuals infected with HIV-1, or with symptoms consistent with acute HIV infection. If HIV status is indeterminate at the enrolment visit, the start of TDF/FTC is delayed for at least 1 month, to confirm HIV negative status. The full list of inclusion and exclusion criteria is presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Inclusion and exclusion criteria for participation in the EPIC-NSW study

Enrolment of participants

Over 20 clinical sites in urban and regional areas of NSW are participating in the project, including public HIV and sexual health services and private general practices with expertise in HIV antiretroviral medication prescribing (see participating health services in Appendix). Clinical sites are eligible to participate if they: (i) are willing to participate in PrEP roll-out; (ii) can enroll at least 10 patients at high risk for HIV who are eligible for PrEP; (iii) are able and willing to follow the study protocol, and (iv) are participating or willing to participate in the ACCESS study and have a patient management system which enables automated electronic transfer of the study variables, or alternatively are willing to complete manual data entry.

Study promotion materials (e.g., paper and electronic posters, flyers, cards and social media) were developed by NSW’s peak gay and lesbian health organisation, AIDS Council of New South Wales (ACON), in consultation with clinicians, researchers and the NSW Government. Their branding style is consistent with the highly recognisable ‘Ending HIV’ campaign from the NSW Ministry of Health communication framework [33]. Other promotion activities conducted by ACON include establishment and management of a list of people interested in PrEP prior to study initiation, online information about study enrolment, community forums and engagement with specific groups of GBM (e.g., GBM of Asian background). The NSW Sexual Health Infolink (SHIL), a NSW Health service, triages potential participants and conducts referral to participating clinics. The study is also promoted on social media and a variety of websites including the study website (, the NSW Health Ending HIV ( page, ACON’s website ( and the websites of some participating clinics. ACON in partnership with PozHet (community organisation of HIV positive heterosexual people) also developed promotional materials on PrEP for the heterosexual community.

Potential participants at high HIV risk are identified among patients attending clinical services based on information available to the clinics, including previously reported high risk behaviour, recent diagnosis of a rectal STI or syphilis, current use of PrEP obtained elsewhere (e.g., purchased online, prescribed in previous demonstration study PrELUDE) or post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Some patients are self-referred as a result of promotion or word of mouth, or referred to participating clinical services by other health service providers.

Upon presentation to health services, potential participants receive information about PrEP and the EPIC-NSW from clinicians or trained peer educators from ACON. In some clinics, trained peer educators provide information about PrEP individually or in group sessions. Risk assessment and eligibility screening for PrEP is conducted using a brief online questionnaire by clinicians. An initial assessment may also be done by a peer educator. In all participating sites, trained clinicians (doctors and nurses) conduct initial risk assessment, and two participating sites additionally use trained peer educators from ACON for onsite or outreach recruitment.

Patients willing to proceed with enrolment into EPIC-NSW are asked to provide individual written informed consent (see Additional file 1 for patient information and consent form) and then assessed for all remaining study inclusion and exclusion criteria described in Table 3. The study consent form also includes three separate optional consents to:

  1. (i)

    participate in a brief quarterly online survey about adherence and risk behaviour;

  2. (ii)

    link the person’s details to the HIV and STI Registries in NSW, and/or

  3. (iii)

    be contacted in the future for other research projects.

Participants are able to change or withdraw their consent to participate in any or all aspects of the study at any time during the course of the study.

To ensure that EPIC-NSW provides equitable access to PrEP to all eligible people in NSW, ACON identified the six most commonly used community languages for non-native English speakers in NSW (including Chinese, Thai, Spanish, Indonesian, Portuguese and Arabic). Consent forms and study promotional materials have been translated/back-translated into these six languages.

Study visits

Study visits and assessment procedures are consistent with the NSW PrEP guidelines (see Table 2). Eligibility screening, enrolment and baseline procedures can be conducted at the same visit. Potential participants provide a medical history (including antiretroviral and other concomitant medications) and undergo testing for HIV (using a 4th-generation HIV test to screen, and supplemental molecular tests if HIV seroconversion is thought possible), STIs (using standard-of-care STI tests, with STI treatment if indicated [34]), hepatitis B and C (using hepatitis B and C antibody tests, with immunisation against hepatitis B if non-immune and not infected), and assessment of renal function. HIV negative status must be confirmed by a fourth generation antibody/antigen HIV test conducted on a specimen collected within 7 days prior to PrEP initiation.

Follow-up visits are conducted three-monthly, in addition to a visit at 1 month after enrolment, to confirm HIV negative status and provide medication adherence advice if necessary. Follow-up visits serve to confirm participants’ ongoing eligibility for PrEP, identify issues with PrEP use, and to screen for HIV and other STIs. Renal function is evaluated at 3 months and biannually thereafter. Hepatitis C antibody testing is conducted annually or more often if clinically indicated. Participants reporting a known or suspected exposure to HIV within 72 h, and a missed daily PrEP dose within 24 h before or after the exposure, are recommended PEP according to the National PEP Guidelines [35].

If eligibility criteria are met and the participant is willing to continue taking PrEP, they receive a TDF/FTC prescription or are dispensed medication for the period until the next study visit. All participants receive supportive adherence counselling and information where necessary.

To support enrolment and follow-up of participants within existing clinic resources, a variety of models of care and study drug provision were supported within EPIC-NSW, including nurse-led models of care, supply and dispensing, and telehealth [36].

Study endpoints

The primary focus of this study is on evaluating the population-level impact of a rapid, targeted PrEP roll-out on HIV diagnoses among GBM in the EPIC-NSW cohort, and HIV incidence among PrEP study participants. Table 4 presents key endpoints alongside study objectives.

Table 4 Study objectives and endpoints

HIV Seroconversions and adverse events

To minimise the likelihood of enrolment of individuals with early acute HIV infection, during the screening, clinicians obtain a history of nonspecific signs or symptoms of viral infection during the preceding 30 days and determine the need for a repeat HIV test.

In case of an HIV positive test result during the study, participants will be advised to stop TDF/FTC and managed according to national HIV management guidelines, including genotyping for drug-resistance [37]. Upon the receipt of additional consent, seroconverters will be asked to participate in a qualitative interview to gain detailed information about PrEP adherence and risk behaviours likely to be associated with the transmission event, and to provide biological specimens to allow an assessment of recent TDF/FTC adherence.

EPIC-NSW reports information on serious adverse events, including HIV infections, to the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) which approved the study and to the manufacturers of TDF/FTC.

Data collection

Online enrolment database

To mimic ‘real world’ implementation as closely as possible, clinical management information is recorded routinely in clinical records and the study collects only critical information about participants in an online study database, including: date of enrolment, a unique client ID number which is generated automatically by the patient management system, gender, risk assessment information and eligibility for PrEP, and confirmation of informed consent, including consent to each optional study component. This online database is designed in SurveyGizmo (a secure online survey platform, Boulder, Colorado, USA). When the client ID is entered by the clinician, the database automatically converts it to a different number (hereafter referred to as scrambled client ID), a requirement of ethical approval. Only participants who agree to join the optional study components, are asked to provide their full name, date of birth and postcode (for data linkage purposes) and an email address (for online surveys of behaviour and medication adherence).

Clinical data collection

All clinical data required to evaluate the uptake and impact of EPIC-NSW is sourced from routine electronic records maintained in the clinical patient management systems. A software program called GRHANITE is used to extract the data. The software was specifically developed to link primary care and hospital data without any personal information leaving the clinic and the tool is used in the ACCESS project [28], to extract and link data from primary care clinics, hospitals and laboratories [38]. Using GHRANITE, data are stripped of any identifying information before leaving the clinical site but can be linked by the scrambled client ID generated by the GHRANITE tool. EPIC-NSW study variables are regularly extracted from clinic databases, and transferred to the ACCESS central database at the Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney. The variables extracted are: year of birth, country of birth, postcode of residence, Indigenous status, issuing of PrEP prescriptions, STI, HIV, hepatitis and creatinine clearance tests and test results, along with the scrambled client ID and clinic ID. The scrambled client ID is formed by the same conversion process as in the enrolment database. Each quarter, a list of scrambled client IDs from the EPIC-NSW enrolment database are provided to the ACCESS data custodians who retrieve the relevant EPIC-NSW study variables described above. The participating clinics utilising data management systems not compatible with GHRANITE enter the same clinical data in a secure online database developed in SurveyGizmo, and so that information from all clinics is available for monitoring of key indicators.

Risk assessment and behavioural data collection is conducted using separate online survey instruments, also designed in SurveyGizmo. The risk assessment tool is used by clinicians to enter information about the participants’ eligibility for enrolment into EPIC-NSW. As to behavioural data collection, participants who voluntarily opt into this component, receive quarterly email invitations with an automatically generated link to a brief survey (up to 10 min to complete). This survey is focused on a seven–day history of sexual partners and practices, and PrEP dosing. Data collected by this approach enable assessment of the patterns of PrEP use as related to patterns of behaviour and the distinction between non-adherence and intentional intermittent PrEP use. The brief, easy-to-follow format of this survey and two automatic email reminders (sent 1 week apart to non-responders) are designed to maximize the survey participation rates.

Data analyses

Using data from the EPIC-NSW cohort, we will calculate the incidence of HIV infection per 100 PY after TDF/FTC prescription and the effect-modifying role of non-adherence to the prescribed daily medication schedule. Incident infection is defined as an HIV diagnosis following a negative test, and time at risk calculated as the time between each patient’s first and last test or a patient’s first test and HIV diagnosis. The number of incident infections will be divided by the total person-years at risk. Analyses of HIV seroconversions will also include a period of 12-months after the completion of the study treatment, using data linkage with the NSW HIV registry (for those participants who consent to data linkage). Similarly, we will calculate the incidence per 100 PY for gonorrhoea, chlamydia and syphilis. Comparisons of incident events across groups and over time will be conducted using survival analysis and cox proportional hazards regression methods.

Using routinely available HIV and STI surveillance data in NSW, we will also assess the average quarterly trends of HIV and STI tests and diagnoses in the population, including in the 12-month period immediately prior to the commencement of recruitment (the pre-intervention period), compared to the 12-month period immediately after the recruitment of the sample of 3700 high-HIV risk individuals.

Analyses of sexual practices and adherence to PrEP will be conducted on the subsample of GBM participating in the optional adherence and behavioural survey. Analyses of sexual practices will mainly focus on CLAI. Analyses of adherence to the study medication will concentrate on time on PrEP, proportion and count of days when PrEP pills were taken, temporal changes in CLAI and PrEP use, and the relationship between CLAI and adherence. We will use longitudinal regression methods as appropriate for binary and count data analyses, to compare proportions and counts of events between groups and to assess trends in proportions and event counts over time.

The study Management Team monitors the study enrolment and primary study outcomes against new HIV diagnoses notified to NSW Health and reported each quarter.

Data analysis is conducted by the Kirby Institute research staff using STATA (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).


EPIC-NSW is a population-based implementation trial of primary HIV prevention with daily TDF/FTC in the context of sexual HIV exposure. This trial evaluates the population impact of PrEP on the HIV epidemic in the entire state of NSW, Australia. It is distinct from studies which have examined the individual-level preventative effect of TDF/FTC [14].

Internationally, this is one of the first trials which aims to provide PrEP to the entire estimated population of GBM at high risk for HIV infection in a particular jurisdiction. EPIC-NSW follows the NSW PrEP guidelines [24] in identifying individuals at high risk for HIV infection. A targeted high-risk approach can be a viable and cost-effective option in other similar settings with initially limited access to PrEP.

The criteria for PrEP eligibility in EPIC-NSW take into account the local epidemiology of HIV acquisition [4, 39]. Factors with HIV incidence of about 2 per 100 person-years or higher were selected to indicate high risk for HIV acquisition in the Australian context. Indicators from the ongoing behavioral surveillance and other research in local gay communities [30, 32], which measure these criteria, were used to estimate the size of the population of GBM and, specifically, of the group at high risk of HIV which is targeted with PrEP.

The data systems employed in EPIC-NSW allow data to be linked between clinical health services in NSW and with NSW HIV notifications data. The methodology employed allows calculating HIV incidence not only in the EPIC-NSW cohort, but also diagnoses in the underlying population in the state of NSW. This methodology minimizes the data collection burden on health services and is as close to real life as possible. This makes EPIC-NSW one of the first population-based cohorts with an ability to assess the impact of PrEP at the population level.

With a follow-up time of at least 7400 person years, the study presents a unique opportunity to inform the international community about the additive effect of PrEP in HIV prevention.

This trial became possible due to the concerted efforts of the research team at the Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, the state government with its time-limited and goal-oriented HIV strategy [10], consensus from clinicians that PrEP implementation was required, a highly functional network of public and private health services, and community activism, leadership and participation in HIV prevention.

Change history

  • 28 February 2018

    After publication of the article [1], it has been brought to our attention that one of the members of the EPIC-NSW study group has had their name spelt incorrectly in the acknowledgements. The article mentions “Muhammad Hammoud” when in fact the correct spelling is “Mohamed Hammoud”.





Gay and Bisexual Men


Human Immunodeficiency Virus


Human Research Ethics Committee


New South Wales


Pre-exposure Prophylaxis




Sexually Transmitted Infection


Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate


  1. Cohen MS, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 Infection with Early Antiretroviral Therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):493–505.

  2. NSW Government,MInistry of Health. NSW HIV strategy 2012–2015: A new era. Sydney, NSW, 2012. Available online at Accessed 30 December 2017.

  3. INSIGHT START Study Group, Lundgren JD, Babiker AG, Gordin F, Emery S, Grund B, Sharma S, Avihingsanon A, Cooper DA, Fätkenheuer G, Llibre JM, Molina JM, Munderi P, Schechter M, Wood R, Klingman KL, Collins S, Lane HC, Phillips AN, Neaton JD. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy in early asymptomatic HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(9):795–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The Kirby Institute. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia Annual Surveillance Report 2014. The Kirby Institute, UNSW, Sydney NSW 2052. Last accesssed on 2 March 2015.

  5. NSW Government. Ministry of Health. NSW HIV Strategy 2016–2020 Quarter 4 & Annual 2016 Data Report. Availalbe online at Accessed 19 Apr 2017.

  6. Gray R. NSW HIV Cascade - 2015. Unpublished analyses. Kirby Institute, UNSW. February 2017.

  7. NSW Government. Ministry of Health. NSW HIV Strategy 2012-2015 Annual Quarter 4 2015 Data Report. Availalbe online at Accessed 7 June 2017.

  8. Holt M, et al. The prevalence and correlates of undiagnosed HIV among Australian gay and bisexual men: results of a national, community-based, bio-behavioural survey. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18(1):20526.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hull, P., Mao, L., Kolstee, J., Duck, T., Feeney, L., Prestage, G., Zablotska, I., Lea, T., de Wit, J., & Holt, M. (2016). Gay Community Periodic Survey: Sydney 2016. Sydney: Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Australia. Available online at Accessed 12 Dec 2016.

  10. NSW HIV Strategy 2016-2020 - NSW health. Available online at: Accessed 10 Jan 2016.

  11. Grant RM, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. NEnglJMed. 2010;363(27):2587–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Molina JM, et al. On-demand Preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2237–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCormack S, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):53–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fonner VA, et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis for all populations. AIDS. 2016;30(12):1973–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gallant JE, et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N.Engl.J.Med. 2006;354(3):251–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hawkins T, et al. Intracellular pharmacokinetics of tenofovir diphosphate, carbovir triphosphate, and lamivudine triphosphate in patients receiving triple-nucleoside regimens. J.Acquir.Immune.Defic.Syndr. 2005;39(4):406–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vourvahis M, et al. The pharmacokinetics and viral activity of tenofovir in the male genital tract. JAcquirImmuneDeficSyndr. 2008;47(3):329–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu AY, et al. Medication adherence among men who have sex with men at risk for HIV infection in the United States: implications for pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2014;28(12):622–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. US Public Health Service. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States – 2014. A clinical practice guideline. Available online:: Accessed 30 Dec 2017.

  20. European AIDS clinical society. Guidelines Version 8.0 October 2015. Available online at: Accessed 10 Jan 2016.

  21. Wright E, Grulich A, Roy K, Boyd M, Cornelisse V, Russell D, O’Donnell D, Witthaker B, Crooks L, Zablotska I. Australasian society for HIV, viral hepatitis and sexual health medicine HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: clinical guidelines. Journal of Virus Eradication. 2017;3:168–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization. Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. September 2015. NLM classification: WHO/WC 503.2. Available online at: Accessed 29 July 2016.

  23. Australian Government Department of Health, Therapeutic Goods Administration. Prescription medicines: new or extended uses, or new combinations of registered medicines: Extension of Indications' registrations, May 2016: Truvada. Available online at: Accessed 1 July 2016.

  24. NSW Government, Ministry of Health. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis of HIV with Antiretroviral Medications: Guideline. Prepared by Dr. Iryna Zablotska on behalf of the NSW PrEP guidelines and clinical delivery group. Availalbe online at: Accessed 18 May 2017.

  25. Vaccher S, et al. Protocol for an open-label, single-arm trial of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among people at high risk of HIV infection: the NSW demonstration project PRELUDE. BMJ Open. 2016;20;6(6):e012179.

  26. Zablotska IB, et al. The informal use of antiretrovirals for preexposure prophylaxis of HIV infection among gay men in Australia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62(3):334–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Holt M, et al. Willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and the likelihood of decreased condom use are both associated with unprotected anal intercourse and the perceived likelihood of becoming HIV positive among Australian gay and bisexual men. Sex TransmInfect. 2012;88(4):258–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guy RJ, Kong F, Goller J, Franklin N, Bergeri I, Dimech W, et al. A new national chlamydia surveillance system in Australia: evaluation of the first stage implementation. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2010;34:319–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Population by Age and Sex, Regions of Australia, June 2014. Available online at Accessed 18 Oct 2016. Canberra.

  30. Grulich AE, et al. Homosexual experience and recent homosexual encounters: the second Australian study of health and relationships. Sex Health. 2014;11(5):439–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. HIV Diagnosis and Care Cascade in 'HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia. Annual Surveillance Report 2017′. The Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052.(pending release).

  32. Zablotska IB, et al. Behavioural surveillance among gay men in Australia: methods, findings and policy implications for the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmissible infections. Sex Health. 2011;8(3):272–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations (AFAO). We can end HIV by 2020. Available online at: Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

  34. Australian STI management guidelines for use in primary care. Availalbe online at: Accessed 18 May 2017.

  35. ASHM. National guidelines for post-exposure prophylaxis after non-occupational exposure to HIV. Australian Government Department of Health and Aging, 2013.

  36. NSW Government. NSW Health Telehealth Framework and Implementation Strategy 2016–2021. Available online at: Accessed 18 May 2017.

  37. ASHM. Antiretroviral guidelines. Welcome to the Australian Commentary on the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Guidelines for the use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents. Available online at: Accessed 30 Dec 2017.

  38. Callander D, et al. A longitudinal cohort study of HIV 'treatment as prevention' in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: the treatment with Antiretrovirals and their impact on positive and negative men (TAIPAN) study protocol. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Jin F, et al. Unprotected anal intercourse, risk reduction behaviours, and subsequent HIV infection in a cohort of homosexual men. AIDS. 2009;23(2):243–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


Clinical Operational Team at the Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney including Barbara Yeung (Project Manager), Gesalit Levitt (Project Coordinator) and Erin Ogilvie (Research Assistant). Database management team at the Kirby |Institute, UNSW Sydney including Stefanie Vaccher (management of behavioural data), Mo Hammoud (database design) and Nasir Wabe (management of enrolment and clinical data). Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance (ACCESS) study including: Lucy Watchirs Smith (management of ACCESS sexual health clinic data, analysis and interpretation of clinical data); Hamish McManus (biostatistical advice) and Denton Callander (scoping of patient management systems) at the Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney; Jason Asselin (management of the ACCESS general practice data and connections) at the Burnet Institute; Douglas Boyle and Sandra Henley-Smith (development and deployment of scrambled clinic IDs used by GHRANITE software) from the Research Information Technology Unit (HaBIC R2) at The University of Melbourne.

Our community partner ACON and its team including Karen Price (Director of HIV and Sexual Health, ACON) and Matthew Vaughan (Principal Planner – Engagement Strategies Unit, ACON).

Study participants

Study site coordinators

Michael Williamson(Holden Street Clinic), Lesley Williams (East Sydney Doctors), Jessie Payne (Holdsworth House Medical Practice), Raghib Ahmad (The Albion Centre), Jodie-lee Little (Illawarra Sexual Health Clinic), John William McAllister (St Vincent’s Hospital, NSW),Anik Ray (Liverpool Sexual Health Clinic), Alison Kincaid (Albury Sexual Health Clinic and Brookong Sexual Health Centre), Loc Le (Taylor Square Private Clinic), Brett Hadlow (Clinic 16), Adriana Trujillo (Nepean Hospital), Melissa Power (Western Sydney Sexual Health Centre), Damien Brown (Short Street Clinic), Ruthy McIver (Sydney Sexual Health Centre), Roisin Dyer (Orange Sexual Health Centre, and Dubbo Sexual Health Centre), Brett Sinclair (Royal Prince Alfred Sexual Health), Michael O’Reilly (Newcastle Community Health Centre), Andrew Buggy (Lismore Sexual Health Centre), Nives Houlihan (Coffs Harbour Sexual Health), Karen Chronister (Kirketon Road Centre), Shane Hewitt (Dr Doong’s Surgery).

The EPIC-NSW study group is:

Andrew E. Grulich, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia Email:

David A. Cooper, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia Email:

Iryna B. Zablotska, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia Email:

Rebecca Guy, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia Email:

Janaki Amin, Mcquarie University and The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia Email:

Fengyi Jin, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia Email:

Christine Selvey, NSW Ministry of Health, NSW, Australia Email:

Jo Holden, NSW Ministry of Health, NSW, Australia Email:

Heather-Marie Schmidt, NSW Ministry of Health, NSW, Australia Email:

Bill Whittaker, NSW Ministry of Health, NSW, Australia.

Karen Price, AIDS Council of New South Wales (ACON), Sydney, NSW, Australia Email:

Nic Parkhill, AIDS Council of New South Wales (ACON), Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Kerry Chant, NSW Ministry of Health, NSW, Australia.

Craig Cooper, Positive Life NSW, NSW, Australia.

Levinia Crooks, Australasian Society for HIV Medicine, NSW, Australia.

Debbie Allen, Holden Street Clinic, NSW, Australia.

David Baker, East Sydney Doctors, NSW, Australia.

Mark Bloch, Holdsworth House Medical Practice, NSW, Australia.

Rohan Bopage, The Albion Centre, NSW, Australia.

Katherine Brown, Illawarra Sexual Health Clinic, NSW, Australia.

Andrew Carr, St Vincent’s Hospital, NSW, Australia.

Christopher Carmody, Liverpool Sexual Health Clinic, NSW, Australia.

Kym Collins, Albury Sexual Health Clinic and Brookong Sexual Health Centre, NSW, Australia.

Robert Finlayson, Taylor Square Private Clinic, NSW, Australia.

Rosalind Foster, Clinic 16, NSW, Australia.

Eva Jackson, Nepean Hospital, NSW, Australia.

David Lewis, Western Sydney Sexual Health Centre, NSW, Australia.

Josephine Lusk, Short Street Clinic, NSW, Australia.

Anna McNulty, Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Orange Sexual Health Centre, and Dubbo Sexual Health Centre, NSW, Australia Email: Anna.McNulty@HEALTH.NSW.GOV.AU

Catherine O’Connor, Royal Prince Alfred Sexual Health, NSW, Australia.

Nathan Ryder, Newcastle Community Health Centre, NSW, Australia.

David Smith, Lismore Sexual Health Centre, NSW, Australia Email:

Emanuel Vlahakis, Coffs Harbour Sexual Health, NSW, Australia.

Phillip Read, Kirketon Road Centre, NSW, Australia.

Barbara Yeung, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Gesalit Levitt, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Erin Ogilvie, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Stefanie Vaccher, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Muhammad Hammoud, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Lucy Watchirs-Smith, the Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Nasir Wabe, The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.


The EPIC-NSW study is funded by the NSW Ministry of Health. Gilead Sciences is providing part of the study supply of TDF/FTC. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the position of these organisations.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets have been analysed during the study thus far.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations




IZ drafted the original study protocol and the manuscript, and estimated the study sample size. DAC and AG are co-Primary Investigators; both provided substantial contribution to the study design and preparation of the manuscript. CS provided substantial feedback on the preparation of the manuscript, particularly on the study design and data analyses. H-MS provided substantial input, particularly on the management of the study medication. JA and FJ provided substantial feedback on the preparation of the manuscript, particularly on data collection and analyses. JH provided substantial input, particularly on the study design and the discussion of the protocol. KP was a major contributor on the promotion of the study and enrolment of participants. RG substantially contributed to the study design, development of the protocol and data collection systems, and preparation of the manuscript, particularly on data collection and analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Iryna B. Zablotska or Andrew E. Grulich.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol is approved by the St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia HREC (primary review, protocol number 1511; reference number HREC/15/SVH/436) and ACON HREC (reference number RERC2015/23). The identifying number is NCT02870790. Site-specific assessments are obtained from each public health service’s Research Office. The design and implementation of this study follows The Declaration of Helsinki and European Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products/ International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (CPMP/ICH) Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. All EPIC-NSW participants have provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

DAC has received honoraria from Gilead Sciences, ViiV and Merck Sharp & Dohme. AG has received research funding from BioCSL Ltd., Viiv and Gilead Sciences, as well as conference travel funding and honoraria for educational presentations from Merck. IZ has received funding and supply of the study medication from Gilead Sciences. DS has received funding to attend local (within Australia) educational events from Gilead, and funding from ViiV, BMS, Merck, Roche, Boehringer Ingleheim and Gilead to hold local education events for health practitioners. CS, H-MS, JA, FJ, JH, KP, RG have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional information

A correction to this article is available online at

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Participant Information Sheet/Consent form. (DOCX 78 kb)



EPIC-NSW: participating health services

  1. 1.

    Sydney Sexual Health Centre

  2. 2.

    Holdsworth House Medical Practice

  3. 3.

    Royal Prince Alfred Sexual Health Clinic

  4. 4.

    St Vincent’s Hospital NSW

  5. 5.

    Taylor Square Private Clinic

  6. 6.

    Western Sydney Sexual Health Centre

  7. 7.

    Hunter New England Sexual Health Services

  8. 8.

    Clinic 16 (North Shore Sexual Health Clinic)

  9. 9.

    Illawarra Sexual Health

  10. 10.

    Lismore Sexual Health Clinic

    11.East Sydney Doctors

  11. 11.

    Holden Street Clinic, Gosford

  12. 12.

    Short Street Clinic, Kogarah

  13. 13.

    Liverpool Sexual Health Clinic

  14. 14.

    Kirketon Road Centre

  15. 15.

    Nepean Blue Mountains Sexual Health & HIV Clinics

  16. 16.

    Albury Wodonga Health, Albury Sexual Health Service

  17. 17.

    Murrumbidgee Local Health District, Wagga Sexual Health Centre

  18. 18.

    Mid North Coast Local Health District, Area HIV/Sexual Health Services in Coffs Harbour, Port Macquarie and Kempsey

  19. 19.

    Orange Sexual Health Clinic

  20. 20.

    Dubbo Sexual Health Clinic

  21. 21.

    The Albion Centre

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zablotska, I.B., Selvey, C., Guy, R. et al. Expanded HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation in communities in New South Wales, Australia (EPIC-NSW): design of an open label, single arm implementation trial. BMC Public Health 18, 210 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: