Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Public Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence and associated risk factors for Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections among children of northwest Mexico: a cross-sectional study

  • Luis Quihui-Cota1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Gloria Guadalupe Morales-Figueroa1,
  • Aarón Javalera-Duarte1,
  • José Antonio Ponce-Martínez1,
  • Edith Valbuena-Gregorio2 and
  • Marco Antonio López-Mata2
BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:852

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4822-6

Received: 3 April 2017

Accepted: 4 October 2017

Published: 30 October 2017

Abstract

Background

G. intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. are responsible for gastrointestinal infections worldwide. Contaminated food, feces, drinking water and predictors such as poverty, cultural and behavioral aspects have been involved in their transmission. Published studies about these infections are limited in Mexico. Cananea, Sonora is located in northwest Mexico and is one of the regions with the lowest marginalization index in the Sonora state. However, its rate of gastrointestinal infections increased from 48.7/1000 in 2003 to 77.9/1000 in 2010 in the general population. It was estimated that the prevalence of giardiasis can range from 20 to 30% in the Sonoran childhood population. However, the prevalence of giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis are unknown in Cananea, Sonora and they are likely contributing to its gastrointestinal infections rates.

Methods

A total of 173 children (average age 8.8 ± 2.8 years) participated in this cross-sectional study. Anthropometric measurements and stool analysis were performed. Socioeconomic, cultural and symptomatology information were collected. The association between the risk factors and intestinal parasitic infections was analyzed by multivariate analysis using the STATA/SE package at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.

Results

More than half of the children (n = 103, 60%) had intestinal parasitic infections. Cryptosporidium spp. showed the highest prevalence (n = 47, 27%), which was followed by G. intestinalis (n = 40, 23%). Children with giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis had lower H/A and BMI/A Z scores than children who were free of these infections. Children with giardiasis were at higher risk (OR = 4.0; 95%CI = 1.11–13.02; p = 0.030) of reporting abdominal pain, and children who drank tap water were at higher risk (OR = 5.0; 95% CI = 1.41–17.20; p = 0.012) of cryptosporidiosis.

Conclusions

This was the first epidemiological study conducted in children in the region of Cananea, Sonora in northwest Mexico. The findings revealed a high prevalence of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis, and their interactions with multiple risk factors were investigated. This study suggested that giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis may play an important role as causative factors of gastrointestinal diseases in the study region. Regional authorities must analyze water for human consumption to search for Cryptosporidium spp. and G. intestinalis.

Keywords

GiardiasisCryptosporidiosisChildrenNorthwest Mexico

Background

It was estimated that approximately two hundred million people were affected yearly with giardiasis in Africa, Asia and Latin America [1]. In addition, the overall prevalence of giardiasis was estimated from 2 to 5% in industrialized countries [2]; meanwhile, the prevalence of Giardia intestinalis (G. intestinalis) in developing countries was estimated as 15 to 20% in children younger than 10 years of age. Another protozoan, Cryptosporidium spp., is found worldwide with a prevalence ranging from 4 to 31% in some developing countries [3]. C. parvum and G. intestinalis have been recognized as important causes of gastrointestinal infections and diarrhea [4], and they can be transmitted by person to person via fecal-oral route or indirect route through contaminated food and drinking water with human or animal feces. For the above reasons, additional factors contributing to the spread of the parasitic infections are socioeconomic status, age, household crowding, education, animal ownership and lack of access to clean water and proper sanitation [5]. In Mexico, the prevalence of giardiasis can range from 3% up to 50% in different regions [6], but the epidemiological trends of cryptosporidiosis remain unknown at the national level. In 2006, sporadic published information highlighted that 41% of 100 infants hospitalized had Cryptosporidium spp. in a public health institution located in Mexico city [7]. In 2013, Olivas-Enriquez et al. detected C. parvum in 19 of 38 (50%) household water samples and in 12 of 13 study communities [8]. In 2010, it was published that 5.1% of 5459 infants from 1 month to 5 years old had Cryptosporidium parvum in Guadalajara, Mexico [9]. Otherwise, it was estimated that 14% (372,742 people) of 2,662,480 inhabitants in the state of Sonora (northwest Mexico) lived in rural communities [10]. Sonora is the second largest Mexican state based on territorial area, and it consists of 72 regions and Cananea is one of them. Some years ago a health report pointed out that Cananea had the second highest rate of gastrointestinal infections (increased from 48.7/1000 in 2003 to 77.9/1000 in 2010) at the state level [11]. Based on this, giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis may be associated with a high rate of gastrointestinal infections reported in that region. Because these infections remain unknown in the region of Cananea, we investigated the prevalence levels of giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis and their association with socioeconomic factors and behavioral habits in children from that region. The information will be useful for preventing and controlling these infections by the regional health authorities.

Methods

Study site and population

This was a cross-sectional study conducted from February 2013 to September 2014 in the region of Cananea, Sonora (northwest Mexico). Cananea has a population of 32,936 inhabitants [10]; it is located at 1654 m above sea level and is bordered to the north by the United States and other Sonoran municipalities such as Naco to the northwest, Arizpe to the south, and Imuris and Santa Cruz to the west (Fig. 1). Cananea has a humid warm climate with an average annual temperature of 15.3 °C, average temperatures of 18 °C and 14 °C during spring and autumn, respectively, and annual rainfall of 545 mm. For this study, three kindergarten and two public primary schools in the region of Cananea were selected because they were located in low income level areas [12] and had high rates of gastrointestinal diseases. A total of 366 preschoolers and 491 school children (total n = 857) who were officially enrolled in the selected schools (school year 2013–2014) [13] were invited to participate. At the same time plastic containers were distributed to collect stool samples (three per child). The study protocol was explained to the school authorities and parents.
Fig. 1

Region of Cananea, Sonora at northwest Mexico

Ethical consideration

Informed consent that explained the purposes, benefits, and risks of the study was provided to each parent or guardian of the participating children prior to starting the study. Two hundred and three children wished to participate in this study. One hundred and seventy-three (20%) children fulfilled the required study criteria. The parents of 30 (3.7%) children did not sign the informed consent. The remaining children (n = 654, 76.3%) did not participate for various reasons. Both participating and non-participating children lived in the same living conditions around the selected kindergartens and schools. The ethics committee of the Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo approved this study. Children with intestinal parasitic infections received the proper treatment from an experienced physician.

Anthropometric measurements

Standing height was measured using a stadiometer (Holtain Ltd., Dyfed, UK) with 2.05 ± 0.001 m capacity, and weight was measured to the nearest 10 g using a digital electronic scale (AND FV-150 KA1, A&D Co. Ltd., Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan) according to the standardized recommendations. Ages were validated from reliable official school records. The weight-for-age (W/A), height-for-age (H/A), and body mass index-for-age (BMI/A) Z scores were calculated using the WHO Anthro for personal computers, version 1.0.4, 2009: Software for assessing the growth and development of the world’s children [14]. Undernutrition risk was defined from −2 to < −1 Z scores and moderate and severe undernutrition from ˂ -2 Z scores considering the median reference values of H/A (stunting), W/A, and BMI/A [15].

Fecal sample collection, processing, and analysis

In the Faust technique [16], each fecal sample was poured into a round-bottom tube (100 by 13 mm) to within 20 mm of the rim. Then, 3 mL of distilled water was added, and the fecal material and water were mixed. The suspension was centrifuged for 10 min at 2500 rpm (700 × g). All centrifugations were performed without mechanical breaking. The supernatant was decanted, and the last drop was drained onto a clean section of paper towel. This washing procedure was repeated 3 times. Then, 3.5 ml of aqueous ZnSO3 solution (1.180 specific gravity) was added to within 50.8 mm of the rim of the tube. The packed sediment was re-suspended using applicator sticks until no coarse particles remained. This suspension was centrifuged for 5 min at 2500 rpm (700 × g) and transferred without agitation to a rack that held it upright; the suspension was then allowed to stand for 20 min. With a wire loop of 5 mm in diameter bent at a right angle to the stem, two loops of the surface film were transferred to a drop of iodine solution (Weigert’s solution) on a glass slide (76.2 by 50.8 mm) for wet-mount examination. Then, 10× and 40× objectives were used for identification of cysts of G. intestinalis. The specific gravity of the zinc sulfate solution was checked every 7 days using a calibrated hydrometer with a specific gravity range of 1.00 to 1.20 throughout the study. In addition, 1 g of fecal sample was smeared on clean slides and stained with the cold acid-fast Kinyoun stain [17] to identify Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts by light microscopy at a magnification of ×100.

Collection of information from children and their families

The collection of particular and socioeconomic information in this study was performed with a structured and locally adapted questionnaire [18]. The interviews were administered face-to-face with parents in the children’s households. A well-trained technician and the person responsible for the study conducted the interviews to lessen potential bias. Several scoring indices were constructed to describe the population. The civil status of the parents was assessed from the married status and was assigned (0) for synonymous with stability or (1) for risk or low stability. The socioeconomic status was assessed from the employment status and parental education, assigning (0) for employed or (1) for unemployed, (0) for complete or (1) for incomplete secondary school. Household conditions were assessed by the type of material used for walls (brick, adobe, block or cardboard), roofs (cement or aluminum plus wood) and floors (ground, cement or mosaic), which were categorized based on local costs of materials and the presence (0) or absence (1) of window nets. Sanitation facilities and hygiene indices were assessed as the use of a flushing toilet (0) or a latrine (1); drinking water was assessed as treated water (0) or tap water (1). We inquired about proper hygiene and hand-washing before eating, after restroom use, or after touching pets present in the household, and these were assigned (0) if “always” or (1) if “not always” and food washing as (0) if “always” or (1) if “not always”. Crowding was estimated using the number of people per room, and it was categorized as less than three (0) or more than three people (1) per room in agreement with the WHO 2006 guidelines [19]. Family income (including economic support from different sources) was estimated as the number of minimum daily-wages ($67.3 pesos or $4.86 USD with the valid type of exchange of $13.84 pesos per dollar at the study time) [20, 21] from dividing the daily family income by the current local minimum daily wage. The health status of the children was investigated based on the visible child’s symptomatology or present symptoms in the last 7 days given by the mothers at the time of interview. The values of (0) and (1) were assigned for the absence and presence, respectively, of abdominal pain and headache. Finally, the absence (0) or presence (1) of domestic animals in the households was investigated.

Statistical analysis

An exploratory analysis of data from the database was conducted. Age and anthropometric indicators of the study children were expressed as a mean value with standard deviation. The prevalence of infection or parasite species was expressed as the percentage of children with pathogenic or commensal protozoa or each identified spp. or genera of protozoa present in any of the provided fecal samples. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) examined the differences between mean values taking into account the influence of the uncontrolled independent variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to test the differences between medians. The proportions were compared using the chi-square test with the corresponding odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals and two-sided p values. The association between the risk factors and intestinal parasitic infections was analyzed using both univariate analysis by simple logistic regression and multiple logistic regression analysis. All plausible biological variables with OR > 1 and p ≤ 0.2 in univariate analysis were selected for multiple logistic regression analysis using stepwise forward elimination with an acceptance criterion of p ≤ 0.05 and the adjusted OR. The resulting preliminary model was evaluated by interaction (p ≤ 0.1) and collinearity (correlation coefficient > 0.7) to generate the final adjusted model.

In all constructed models, the dependent variable was intestinal parasitic infection and the risk factor was the hypothesized independent variable. The variables judged to be possible confounding factors, such as sex and Z scores for the anthropometric indices, were used in the multiple logistic regression analysis. Regression diagnostics to identify outliers and influential data points were also conducted. All data were analyzed using statistical software STATA/SE version 12.0 (StataCorp. 2011. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP).

Results

Prevalence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium

A total of 488 fecal samples were collected and transported in ice boxes to the parasitology laboratory of the Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo and were stored between 5 °C and 7 °C for 24–72 h until analysis. Eighty-seven percent (n = 150), 8% (n = 15) and 5% (n = 8) of the participant children gave 3, 2 and 1 sample(s) per child, respectively.

The overall prevalence of pathogenic and commensal protozoa found in the participant children (n = 173) is shown in Table 1. More than half (n = 103) of the children had protozoan infections (60%), and 29% (n = 50) had infections with two or more protozoan genera. No difference was found in the prevalence of protozoan infections between females and males (p = 0.290; data not shown). Cryptosporidium spp. showed the highest prevalence (n = 47, 27%), which was followed by G. intestinalis. (n = 40, 23%). In addition, E. histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii were also detected, albeit at a lower prevalence. However, the species of the E. histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii complex were not identified. On the other hand, E. nana had the highest prevalence (n = 57, 33%) of all pathogenic and commensal protozoa detected in this study. I. bütschlii had a lower prevalence (n = 1, 0.6%). Finally, the helminth H. nana was only found in 4 children (2%) (not shown in Table 1). E. histolytica is well recognized as a pathogenic amoeba, but E. dispar, E. nana, E. coli and I. bütschlii are considered a non-pathogenic amoebae [22]. However, pathogenicity of E. moschkovskii remains unknown [23].
Table 1

Prevalence of pathogenic and commensal protozoa in 173 children of the region of Cananea in northwest Mexico

Status (n)a

Percentage (95% CI)d

Uninfected (70)

40 (33–48)

Infectionb (103)

60 (52–67)

Polyparasitismc(50)

29 (22–36)

Pathogenics

Cryptosporidium spp. (47)

27 (20–33)

Giardia intestinalis (40)

23 (17–29)

Entamoeba histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii e (4)

2 (0.5–4.5)

Commensal

Endolimax nana (57)

33 (26–40)

Entamoeba coli (29)

17 (11–23)

Iodamoeba bütschlii (1)

0.6 (0.02–1.7)

aNumber of cases

bInfection with one or more genera or species (cases of H. nana included)

cInfection with two or more genera or species (cases of H. nana included)

dConfidence interval

ePathogenic/non-pathogenic protozoa

Infection and nutritional status

At baseline, the average age of the study children (n = 173) was 8.8 (±2.8) years old. Fifty-one percent (n = 88) and 49% (n = 85) were female and male, respectively. No difference was found between the proportions of female and male participants (p = 0.747). Our study children consisted of 26 preschools and 147 primary school children with average ages of 3.6 (±0.98) and 9.7 (±1.93), respectively. In relation to the anthropometric measurements, the proportions below −2 SD in W/A, H/A (stunting) and BMI/A were 1.5% (n = 3), 3.3% (n = 6) and 3% (n = 5), respectively. The means (SD) for the W/A, H/A and BMI/A Z scores were 0.135 (±1.12), −0.53 (±1.41) and 0.42 (±1.40), respectively.

No difference was found in the age, weight, height, W/A Z scores between the children with and without giardiasis or cryptosporidiosis (Table 2). However, children with giardiasis or cryptosporidiosis had significantly lower H/A and BMI/A Z scores than uninfected children (p = 0.001 and p = 0.028 and p = 002 and p = 0.030 respectively) (Table 2).
Table 2

Characteristics of the free and infected children with Giardia and Cryptosporidium of the region of Cananea in northwest Mexico

Variable

Free of pathogenic species

*G. intestinalis infected

p valuee

 

n = 93

n = 40

 

Age (years)

8.5 (±2.9)

8.7 (±2.9)

0.716c

Weight (kg)a

21.6 (18.2–23.9)

25.6 (20.8–31.6)

0.379b

Height (cm)

125.2 (±24.3)

123.5 (±19.2)

0.667c

W/A (Z score)d

0.31 (±1.1) (n = 65)

−0.14 (±1.1) (n = 25)

0.089c

H/A (Z score)

−0.11 (±1.6)

−1.05 (±1.0)

0.001c

BMI/A (Z score)

0.67 (±1.3)b

0.06 (±1.5)

0.028c

 

Free of pathogenic species

**Cryptosporidium spp. infected

 
 

n = 93

n = 47

 

Age (years)

8.5 (±2.9)

9.2 (±2.8)

0.170c

Weight (kg)a

21.6 (18.2–23.9)

29.1 (23.2–36.7)

0.201b

Height (cm)

125.2 (±24.3)

124.3 (13.1)

0.776c

W/A (Z score)d

0.31 (±1.1) (n = 65)

−0.09 (±1.1) (n = 35)

0.087c

H/A (Z score)

−0.11 (±1.6)

−0.83 (±1.1)

0.002c

BMI/A (Z score)

0.67 (±1.32)b

0.13 (±1.4)

0.030c

*Children with G. intestinalis and other pathogenic and commensal species

**Children with Cryptosporidium spp. and other pathogenic and commensal species

aMedian (25–75% inter-quantiles); remaining data are presented as mean ± standard deviation

bWilcoxon rank-sum test

cANCOVA adjusted by other pathogenic genera or species rather than *G. intestinalis or **Cryptosporidium spp.

dNot all W/A Z scores of the children could be estimated

Distribution of risk factors of the families of participating children

One hundred and seventy-three mothers and 45 fathers of the children responded to the questionnaires. Most of the participating children came from homes with unmarried mothers and fathers (Table 3). At the time of the interview, most mothers were housewives and most fathers were employed. Most parents had not completed their secondary education, and more than half of the families were living with 1 or less valid minimum wages. Twenty-four percent of the families of the participating children were living in crowded conditions, and 90% were living in households made of materials that were appropriate for the weather conditions of the study area. Also, most of the children’s families drank water directly from the tap (59%). In addition, 43% of the families had domestic animals (Table 3).
Table 3

Distribution of risk factors collected from parents of participant children of the region of Cananea in northwest Mexico

Characteristic

Number of interviews

Categories

Percentage (n)

Civil status

   

 Mother

173

Married

32 (56)

  

Unmarried (free union, widow, single)

68 (117)

 Father

45a

Married

30 (14)

  

Unmarried (free union)

70 (31)

Economic activity

   

 Mother

173

Yes (sales, teacher, babysitter, adult patient care, cleaning of homes, maid, laundry, merchant, employee, retired)

43 (74)

  

No (housewife, student)

57

 Father

45

Yes (sowing, mechanic, laborer, sales, miner, merchant, painter, teacher, blacksmith, carpenter, welder)

88 (40)

  

No (student)

12

Education

   

 Mother

173

Completed secondary

25 (40)

  

Uncompleted secondary

75

 Father

45

Completed secondary

25 (11)

  

Uncompleted secondary

75

Family Income

173

  
  

˃ 4.86 USD

21 (36)

  

≤4.86 USD (≤1 minimum wage/day)

79

Crowding

173

  
  

<3 persons per room

76 (131)

  

>3 persons per room

24

Household characteristics

173

  

 Walls material

 

Cement, brick, block, adobe

90 (156)

  

Other material (cardboard)

10

 Floor material

 

Laminate, mosaic, cement

90 (156)

  

Ground

10

 Roof material

 

Cement, wood and metal laminate

90 (156)

  

Only metal laminate

10

Drinking Water

173

  
  

Treated water (boiled or with iodine and/or chlorine solution or commercial purified water)

41 (71)

  

Direct tap water (only with chlorine 5 ppm).

59

Symptomatology

173

  

 Abdominal pain

   
  

Yes

64 (111)

  

No

36

 Headache

   
  

Yes

46 (80)

  

No

54

Domestic animals

173

  
  

No

57 (99)

  

Yes (chickens, dogs, cats)

43

aPresent as family member confirmed by the mother at the time of the interview. The rest of the families had no paternal figure

Factors associated with G. intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp.

G. intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. were separately analyzed as dependent variables and risk factors as independent variables. Univariate analysis revealed that the drinking water type, presence of domestic animals in the household, symptomatology and seasonality for sample collection for giardiasis; and drinking water type and presence of domestic animals in the household for cryptosporidiosis fulfilled the acceptance criterion for examination in the multiple regression analysis (Table 4). The civil status, education and economic activity of the parents; family income; crowding and household conditions did not meet the criteria (data not shown). The nutritional status, sex and age are recognized to be factors that influence the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections [24, 25]. They were used as adjustment variables in the multiple regression logistic analysis (stepwise), and preliminary models for giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis were produced. Interaction (p > 0.1) and collinearity (p < 0.7) were not found for those models, and the final models were defined (Table 5). The Giardia-infected children had higher risk to present abdominal pain (OR = 4.0, 95%CI = 1.11–13.02, p = 0.030) adjusted by sex, age, W/A, H/A, and BMI/A Z-scores. On the other hand, children drinking tap water were at a higher risk (OR = 5.0, 95%CI =1.41–17.20, p = 0.012) of cryptosporidiosis with the same adjustment variables (Table 5).
Table 4

Univariate analysis of giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis with risk factors in 173 children from three kindergarten and two public primary schools of the region of Cananea, Sonora in northwest Mexico

 

Giardia

Cryptosporidium

Variable

n

Giardia infecteda

OR (95%CI)

p*

n

Cryptosporidium spp. infectedb

OR (95%CI)

p*

Drinking water

40

   

47

   

Treated water

 

9

1.0

  

12

1.0

 

Tap water

 

31

3.9 (1.7–8.9)

0.014

 

35

3.9 (1.64–9.10)

0.002

Keep domestic animals

40

   

47

   

No

 

23

1.0

  

20

1.0

 

Yes

 

17

2.8 (1.30–5.88)

0.008

 

27

3.5 (1.55–7.56)

0.002

Symptoms

40

   

47

   

No Abdominal pain

 

23

1.0

  

16

1.0

 

Abdominal pain

 

17

3.2 (1.32–7.81)

0.010

 

31

1.54 (0.69–3.45)

0.290

No Headache

 

23

1.0

  

27

1.0

 

Headache

 

17

2.9 (1.35–6.02)

0.006

 

20

0.74 (0.35–1.51)

0.390

Season for sample collection

40

   

42

   

Autumn

 

8

1.0

  

16

1.0

 

Spring

 

32

3.53 (1.45–8.56)

0.005

 

26

1.1 (0.50–2.25)

0.902

OR (95%CI) = Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

*p significant at ≤0.05 (logistic regression analysis)

aChildren with G. intestinalis and other pathogenic and commensal genera or species

bChildren with Cryptosporidium spp. and other pathogenic and commensal genera or species

Table 5

Multiple logistic regression analysis of giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis with the risk factors that fulfilled the acceptance criterion in the univariate analysis

Giardia infecteda (n = 40)

OR

(95%CI)

*p

Abdominal pain

4.00

1.11–13.02

0.030

Sexc

1.81

0.67–4.90

0.237

Agec

0.84

0.65–1.05

0.178

W/A (Z score)c

2.81

0.98–8.09

0.054

H/A (Z score)c

0.30

0.15–0.64

0.002

BMI/A (Z score)c

0.13

0.18–0.92

0.032

Cryptosporidium spp. infectedb (n = 47)

OR

(95%CI)

*p

Tap water

5.00

1.41–17.20

0.012

Sexc

0.47

0.15–1.40

0.190

Agec

1.56

1.11–2.18

0.010

W/A (Z score)c

3.88

1.23–12.20

0.020

H/A (Z score)c

0.39

0.20–0.77

0.007

BMI/A (Z score)c

0.35

0.14–0.85

0.210

OR (95%CI) = Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

*p significant at ≤0.05 (Multiple logistic regression analysis)

aChildren with G. intestinalis and other pathogenic and commensal genera or species

bChildren with Cryptosporidium spp. and other pathogenic and commensal genera or species

cAdjustment variables

Discussion

This study concerned the prevalence of G. intestinalis and Crypstosporidium spp. and the risk factors associated with their presence. The study was performed from February 2013 to September 2014 in children from two public elementary schools and three public kindergartens located in the region of Cananea in northwestern Mexico. More than half of the children (n = 103, 60%) had infections by pathogenic and commensal protozoa, and one-third had intestinal polyparasitism (n = 50, 29%). In 2010, Sánchez and Miramontes [26] also found that nearly half (42.2%) of 2055 children from 3 to 19 years of age in 14 rural communities in San Luis Potosí had intestinal parasites. In addition, no difference was found in the prevalence of these infections between boys and girls or school and preschool children in this study. Some years ago, another local study found no difference (p = 0.989) in the prevalence of these infections between male (n = 157) and female (n = 155) school children of different rural and suburban areas in southern Sonora. These children are probably exposed to the same risk factors, irrespective of their sex [27]. In addition, a recent systematic epidemiological review (n = 103 studies) in Iran revealed that the similar prevalences of these infections between Iranian preschool and school children (38.2 and 43.4%, respectively) are probably influenced by factors such as sanitation, hygiene, awareness of people, seasonal variations and health education [28]. On the other hand, G. intestinalis (n = 40, 23%) remains an important protozoan that causes infection in school children in northwest México [29]. Conversely, Sánchez and Miramontes found a low prevalence of giardiasis (approximately 5%) in 2126 children from 3 to 19 years of age [26], which is probably associated with the massive antiparasitic campaigns in their study communities. In this study, the prevalence of cryptosporidiosis (n = 47, 27%) was as high as giardiasis (23%). Therefore, this study revealed that G. intestinalis is not the only predominant protozoan affecting children in Cananea in northwest Mexico, but it is also accompanied by Cryptosporidium spp. Otherwise, the helminth H. nana and the protozoa E. histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii were found to have low prevalences (2 and 2.3%, respectively). These prevalence levels were lower than those published in 2015 for these organisms (16 and 10%, respectively) in school children from different communities of the Sonora state [27]. The low prevalence of H. nana is probably associated with the national albendazole campaign that is administered twice a year in the study site [29], but the low prevalence of E. histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii is probably a result of the poor efficacy of the Faust technique for detecting these organisms [30, 31]. Sanchez and Miramontes [26] observed the same finding (approximately 1.2% for E. histolytica) using the Faust technique. It should be remarked that these prevalence data may be underestimated because proper molecular assays are more effective and sensitive than microscopic methods for the detection of parasitic infections and differentiation of species. However, the high cost is still a limiting factor. On the other hand, a high prevalence of commensal protozoa was found in our study (E. nana, 33% and E. coli, 17%). These protozoa are indicators of poor sanitary conditions, and they are a public health concern because they use the same transmission routes as pathogenic organisms [32]. With respect to the nutritional status, the study children had a prevalence of undernutrition according to H/A (stunting) and W/A Z scores that were lower than and similar to, respectively, the prevalence published by the national survey in 2012 (3.3% vs. 13.6% and 1.5% vs. 1.6%) [33]. However, it should be emphazised that our study children are not representative of the entire population of the Sonora state.

On the other hand, children with giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis had lower H/A and BMI/A Z scores than children free of these infections (Table 2) which is probably a result of the parasite interfering with intestinal absorption leading to malnutrition. Duran et al., [34] found in 3388 children that the average BMI of the Giardia infected children was significantly lower than in those free of these infection (17.86 ± 0.22 kg/m2 versus 19.49 ± 0.097 kg/m2). Similarly, a study in Brazil found a lower H/A Z score in children with giardiasis than in Giardia-free children in 2007 [35]. These authors suggested that giardiasis can reduce the weight of affected children, but chronic infection may contribute to the height deficits observed in their study communities. In our study, giardiasis or cryptosporidiosis was associated with stunting, and different studies have shown that even asymptomatic giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis can be associated with growth shortfalls [36, 37]. However, it should be emphasized that factors such as re-infection, chronic infection and chronic poor dietary intake can potentially predispose children to stunting.

Furthermore, the system of potable water is of great concern to the transmission of intestinal protozoan infections in the study site. Drinking water directly from tap was a risk factor of cryptosporidiosis (OR = 4.42) in the participating children. The agency responsible of water management at local level add 5.0 mg of chlorine per litter of water to an area of concentrating water before is distributed to the water distribution network of the Cananea region. However, Cryptosporidium spp. is resistant to conventional disinfectants and it has been reported active infections in mice inoculated with 60,000 oocysts exposed for 90 min with 80 mg of chlorine per litter of water [38]. On a worldwide scale, there is great concern for authorities responsible for providing safe drinking water for human consumption because an increasing number of waterborne outbreaks of this infection have been reported, particularly in the USA and UK. Innovative technologies to improve detection, monitoring and surveillance of Cryptosporidium appeared after 1996, which is when the American Federal Government considered these to be drinking water contaminants and prompted the USEPA to create and implement drinking water regulations [4]. On the other hand, there are drinking water regulations in Mexico with standards that do not include Cryptosporidium spp. analysis [39]. No association was found between giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis with the age of the children, the civil status and education of the parents, family income, crowding, household conditions, domestic animals and seasonality or domestic animals at home (data not shown). On the other hand, symptomatology was associated with giardiasis, but not with cryptosporidiosis. Probably this resulted of the reflection of children’s susceptibility to giardiasis or cryptosporidiosis in this study [3]. Finally, this was the first epidemiological study in Cananea focusing on children. Our study has limitations to be considered while interpreting the results. We conducted three stool examinations to detect G. intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp., but 8% (n = 14) and 5% (n = 9) of the children gave two and one sample(s), respectively. Because optimal laboratory diagnosis of parasites in stool samples requires the examination of at least three specimens collected over different days, some degree of underestimation could be present. Previous studies have suggested that one stool sample has a sensitivity of between 50 and 70%, but three serial samples have a sensitivity of up to 90% [40]. Conclusions about the causality of associations between different factors and the detected protozoa could not be drawn because this is a cross-sectional study design. Most socioeconomic characteristics of the participating children were not associated with giardiasis or cryptosporidiosis in this study, which is probably related to the low sample size. On the other, although this study had a low sample size, it was sufficiently strong to identify a significant association between giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis and several variables even after adjusting for the presence of other factors in the analysis.

Conclusion

This study provided data on the prevalence and important data regarding risk factors for giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis. These infections are a concern of public health in the studied children of the region of Cananea, Sonora, northwest Mexico. The data suggested that giardiasis and cryptsoporidiosis may contribute to height deficits in our study children. On the other hand, because domestic tap water is a risk indicator of infection, monitoring bacteria in drinking water, as dictated by the Mexican law, should be accompanied by analysis of G. intestinalis and Cryptosporidium to assess the quality standards of drinking water in the study site. It was also suggested that giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis may be somewhat responsible for the rate of gastrointestinal diseases present in the population of that region. Based on these findings, actions must be taken by the regional health authorities to reduce and prevent gastrointestinal infections as well as to monitor the quality of the drinking water in the study site.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Julián Esparza Romero PhD for his advisement in the statistical analysis of this work. Also,authors thank Grupo Mexico S.A.B de C.V, especially to Ing. Remigio Martinez Muller for their financial support. Thanks to C. Martin Paz for all the facilities granted in the region of Cananea. Similarly, thanks to the Comisión Estatal del Agua de la Región of Cananea for all facilities and financial given to this study. Also, we would like to thank the participating children and the authorities of the kindergarden and public primary schools who provided all facilities to perform this study. This study was for them.

Funding

This study was funded by the Center of Research in Food and Development (CIAD), and all authors want to declare that they have contributed to the design, analysis and interpretation, preparation and approbation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Ethical conditions to develop this study included respecting the confidentiallity of the study population. All data or information provided by this study will be kept under the protection of CIAD facilities and will only be available to CIAD personnel involved in the study.

Authors’ contributions

LQC, GGMF and MALM planned this study, collected information, entered, analyzed and interpreted the study data, and prepared and approved the final version of the manuscript; AJD, JAPM and EVG participated in the field study, data collection and in the development of the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo. All children with intestinal parasitic infections received proper treatment from an experienced physician. All parents of the participating children signed informed consent. Children were free to choose to participate in the study even after their parents signed an informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Nutrición Pública y Salud, Coordinación de Nutrición, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo
(2)
Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Sonora, Campus Cajeme

References

  1. Norhayati M, Fatmah MS, Yusof S, Edariah AB. Intestinal parasitic infections in man: a review. Med J Malaysia. 2003;58:296–305. quiz 6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Noor-Azian MY, San YM, Gan CC, Yusri MY, Nurulsyamzawaty Y, Zuhaizam AH, et al. Prevalence of intestinal protozoa in an aborigine community in Pahang, Malaysia. Trop Biomed. 2007;24:55–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Molloy SF, Tanner CJ, Kirwan P, Asaolu SO, Smith HV, Nichols RAB, et al. Sporadic Cryptosporidium infection in Nigerian children: risk factors with species identification. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139:946–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. USEPA. Method 1693: Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Disinfected Wastewater by Concentration/IMS/IFA. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/method_1693_2014.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2016.
  5. Al-Mohammed HI, Amin TT, Aboulmagd E, Hablus HR, Zaza BO. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and its relationship with socio–demographics and hygienic habits among male primary schoolchildren in Al–Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2010;3:906–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cedillo-Rivera R, Leal YA, Yépez-Mulia L, Gómez-Delgado A, Ortega-Pierres G, Tapia-Conyer R, et al. Seroepidemiology of Giardiasis in Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:6–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sánchez-Vega JT, Tay-Zavala J, Aguilar-Chiu A, Ruiz-Sánchez D, Malagón F, Rodríguez-Covarrubias JA, et al. Cryptosporidiosis and other intestinal protozoan infections in children less than one year of age in Mexico City. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:1095–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Olivas-Enríquez E, Flores-Márgez JP, Di Giovanni G, Corral-Díaz B, Osuna-Avila P. Contaminación fecal en agua potable del Valle de Juárez. Terra Latinoamericana. 2013;31:135–43.Google Scholar
  9. Larrosa-Haro A, Macias-Rosales R, Sánchez-Ramírez CA, Cortés-López MC, Aguilar-Benavides S. Seasonal variation of enteropathogens in infants and preschoolers with acute diarrhea in western Mexico. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51:534–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. INEGI. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. http://www.inegi.org.mx/. Accessed 15 Mar 2016.
  11. Anuario Estadistico. Edicion 2003. Sistema Estatal de Salud. http://www.saludsonora.gob.mx/descargas/estadisticas/AnuarioEstadistico2003.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2017.
  12. COCEF, SIDUR, Gobierno Edo de Sonora. Diagnostico de necesidades de pavimentacion por imagenes satelitales para Cananea, Sonora. http://www.cocef.org/desarrollo-de-capacidades/publicaciones-e-informes/diagnosticos-de-necesidades-de-pavimentacion-por-imagenes-satelitales-de-cananea-sonora-mexico. V2rrQle0JsM. Accessed 5 June 2016.
  13. SEC. Poblacion escolar inscrita durante el ciclo 2013–2014. Municipio de Cananea, Sonora. In: Registro y certificacion de educacion basica. Sonora: Secretaria de Educación y cultura; 2013.Google Scholar
  14. WHO. WHO Anthro for personal computers, version 1.0.4, 2009: Software for assessing growth and development of the world’s children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar
  15. WHO. Child Growth Standards: Methods and development. http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/technical_report. Accessed 8 Oct 2016.
  16. John DT, Petri WA, Markell EK, Voge M. Markell and Voge’s medical parasitology. 9th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2006.Google Scholar
  17. Kinyoun JJ. A note on Uhlenhuths method for sputum examination, for tubercle bacilli. Am J Public Health. 1915;5:867–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. AMAI. Asociacion mexicana de agencias de investigacion de mercado y opinion publica A.C. http://nse.amai.org. Accessed 8 Aug 2017.
  19. WHO. The World Health Report 2006 - working together for health. http://www.who.int/whr/2006/en/. Accessed 3 Nov 2016.
  20. CONASAMI. Comision Nacional de los Salarios Minimos. http://www.conasami.gob.mx/pdf/tabla_salarios_minimos/2010/01_01_2010.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2016.
  21. IRS. Yearly Average Currency Exchange Rates Translating foreign currency into U.S. dollars. https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/yearly-average-currency-exchange-rates. Accessed 5 June 2016.
  22. CDC. Parasites - Nonpathogenic (Harmless) Intestinal Protozoa. https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/nonpathprotozoa/faqs.html. Accessed 8 Aug 2017.
  23. Shimokawa C, Kabir M, Taniuchi M, Mondal D, Kobayashi S, Ali IKM, et al. Entamoeba moshkovskii is associated with diarrhea in infants and causes diarrhea and colitis in mice. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:744–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobsen KH, Ribeiro PS, Quist BK, Rydbeck BV. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in young Quichua children in the highlands of rural Ecuador. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25:399–405.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmidlin T, Hürlimann E, Silué KD, Yapi RB, Houngbedji C, Kouadio BA, et al. Effects of hygiene and defecation behavior on Helminths and intestinal protozoa infections in Taabo, Côte d’Ivoire. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65722.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanchez de la Barquera-Ramos MA, Miramontes-Zapata M. Parasitosis intestinales en 14 comunidades rurales del altiplano de México. Rev Mex Patol Clin. 2011;58:16–25.Google Scholar
  27. Quihui-Cota L, Lugo-Flores CM, Ponce-Martínez JA, Morales-Figueroa GG. Cryptosporidiosis: a neglected infection and its association with nutritional status in schoolchildren in northwestern Mexico. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015;9:878–83.Google Scholar
  28. Daryani A, Hosseini-Teshnizi S, Hosseini S-A, Ahmadpour E, Sarvi S, Amouei A, et al. Intestinal parasitic infections in Iranian preschool and school children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Trop. 2017;169:69–83.Google Scholar
  29. Quihui-Cota L, Morales-Figueroa GG. Persistence of intestinal parasitic infections during the national de-worming campaign in schoolchildren of northwestern Mexico: a cross-sectional study. Ann Gastoenterol. 2012;25:57–60.Google Scholar
  30. Calegar DA, Nunes BC, Monteiro KJL, dos Santos JP, Toma HK, Gomes TF, et al. Frequency and molecular characterisation of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Entamoeba moshkovskii, and Entamoeba hartmanni in the context of water scarcity in northeastern Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016;111:114–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Tello R, Terashima A, Marcos LA, Machicado J, Canales M, Gotuzzo E. Highly effective and inexpensive parasitological technique for diagnosis of intestinal parasites in developing countries: spontaneous sedimentation technique in tube. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16:e414–e6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bloomfield SF, Stanwell-Smith R, Crevel RWR, Pickup J. Too clean, or not too clean: the hygiene hypothesis and home hygiene. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36:402–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Gutierrez JP, Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levy T, Villalpando-Hernandez S, Franco A, Cuevas-Nasu L, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012. Resultados Nacionales. Cuernavaca: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX); 2012.Google Scholar
  34. Duran C, Hidalgo G, Aguilera W, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Albano C, Cortez J, et al. Giardia lamblia infection is associated with lower body mass index values. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2010;4:417–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Carvalho-Costa FA, Gonçalves AQ, Lassance SL, Silva Neto LM, Salmazo CAA, Bóia MN. Giardia lamblia and other intestinal parasitic infections and their relationships with nutritional status in children in Brazilian Amazon. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2007;49:147–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Berkman DS, Lescano AG, Gilman RH, Lopez SL, Black MM. Effects of stunting, diarrhoeal disease, and parasitic infection during infancy on cognition in late childhood: a follow-up study. Lancet. 2002;359:564–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Newman RD, Sears CL, Moore SR, Nataro JP, Wuhib T, Agnew DA, et al. Longitudinal study of cryptosporidium infection in children in northeastern Brazil. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:167–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Korich DG, Mead JR, Madore MS, Sinclair NA, Sterling CR. Effects of ozone, chlorine dioxide, chlorine, and monochloramine on Cryptosporidium Parvum oocyst viability. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:1423–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Secretaria de Salud. Modificación a la norma oficial mexiacana NOM-Secretaria de Salud. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.Google Scholar
  40. Kucik CJ, Martin GL, Sortor BV. Common intestinal parasites. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:1161–8.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement