Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The centrality of social ties to climate migration and mental health

BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:600

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4508-0

Received: 6 January 2017

Accepted: 14 June 2017

Published: 6 July 2017

Abstract

Climate change-related hazards and disasters, known to adversely impact physical and mental health outcomes, are also expected to result in human migration above current levels. Environmentally-motivated migration and displacement may lead to the disruption of existing social ties, with potentially adverse consequences for mobile populations as well as their family members who remain in places of origin. We propose that the disruption of social ties is a key mechanism by which climate-related migration may negatively impact mental health, in particular. Existing social ties may provide social and material resources that buffer mental health stressors related to both prolonged and acute climate events. Preparation for such events may also strengthen these same ties and protect mental health. Communities may leverage social ties, first to mitigate climate change, and second, to adapt and rebuild post-disaster in communities of origin. Additionally, social ties can inform migration decisions and destinations. For example, scholars have found that the drought-motivated adaptive migration of West African Fulbe herders only occurred because of the long-term development of social networks between migrants and non-migrants through trade and seasonal grazing. On the other hand, social ties do not always benefit mental health. Some migrants, including those from poor regions or communities with no formal safety net, may face considerable burden to provide financial and emotional resources to family members who remain in countries of origin. In destination communities, migrants often face significant social marginalization. Therefore, policies and programs that aim to maintain ongoing social ties among migrants and their family and community members may be critically important in efforts to enhance population resilience and adaptation to climate change and to improve mental health outcomes. Several online platforms, like Refugee Start Force, serve to integrate refugees by connecting migrants directly to people and services in destination communities. These efforts may increasingly draw upon novel technologies to support and maintain social networks in the context of population mobility due to climatic and other factors.

Keywords

Human migration Climate change Mental health Social support Social ties Environmental justice

Background

Humans have long migrated due to changing climates, but have never before faced such rapid, global, anthropogenic change [1]. 2016 was the hottest year on record and recent reports find accelerating sea-level rise [2]. If high greenhouse gas emissions continue, oceans could rise by as much as 6 ft by the end of the twenty-first century [3]. Acute weather events, along with related protracted environmental and economic changes may contribute directly and indirectly to the dislocation of populations [4]. From 2008 to 2015, climate and weather-related disasters displaced an average of 22.5 million people annually [5]. However, because migration and climatic hazards are multi-causal, scholars have been hesitant to attribute any single migratory flow to climate change directly.

Nevertheless, even with successful adaptation–or activities that reduce impacts from climatic changes, such as crop substitution or new reservoir construction–climate change is expected to result in some migration above current levels [6]. Migration can also represent a positive adaptation to climate change [7] when remaining in place is no longer tenable; communities that face environmental hazards and lack the social or economic resources to move may become “trapped” in place [7].

Social ties are also a central driver of migration decisions, given that information about the costs and benefits of movement is transmitted in large part through pre-existing social networks (i.e., multiple, connected social ties) [8]. Social ties have also been linked to population health, through protective mechanisms of resource sharing (i.e., social capital) and emotional support, as well as through stress-inducing mechanisms of social and financial burden [9]. In general, populations in motion may face stressors related to the disruption of their social networks, for example, through separation from family and community members due to migration or displacement. Mobile populations may also face substantial social isolation and marginalization in destination contexts. On the other hand, they may work to maintain pre-existing social networks at a distance, by sending remittances or making phone calls to family and community members who remain in places of origin or who have also migrated [10]. These social ties may serve as a source of substantial resilience–or capacity to cope with adverse events while maintaining function, identity, and capacity to adapt, learn, and thrive–if they are characterized by high levels of trust and support (i.e., social cohesion). Social ties may have additional benefit when they provide resources for coping both emotionally and economically in the aftermath of climatic events.

Scholars and policy makers have identified numerous health consequences of climate change, including the spread of infectious disease, injury and death due to acute natural disasters, heat-related illness, as well as adverse mental health outcomes [11]. Discussion of the health consequences of climate migration has been more limited, but has included altered distribution of infectious diseases [12], increased violence [13], and reduced access to healthcare [5].

Nevertheless, public health requires a richer understanding of the role of the social environment on health before, during, and after climate migration. In this commentary, we propose a framework that considers social ties as both drivers and modifiers of climate migration and the health outcomes of migrants (Fig. 1). We focus our commentary on mental health, given the strong empirical support for the link between social ties and mental health outcomes and the relative absence of literature discussing mental health in the context of climate change [14]. Mental health, defined by the World Health Organization as an overall state of wellbeing that includes the ability to cope with daily stressors and make contributions to one’s family and community, is a critical component of population wellbeing and productivity [15].
Fig. 1

Conceptual Framework for the Role of Social Ties in Climate-Related Migration and Mental Health

Throughout the commentary we provide examples of research on each component of our conceptual framework (Fig. 1). We draw on a broad body of evidence, including examples that are not directly related to climate change, but that may provide an indication of what might occur in the aftermath of acute and protracted climatic events. This includes evidence of health and mobility outcomes after earthquakes, or in the context of labor or conflict-related migration flows. While we incorporate examples from across the globe, we note that vulnerability to climate change and climate migration is heterogeneous both across and within country contexts. Low and middle-income countries are disproportionately impacted by climate change, although they have received relatively little economic benefit from the activities that have fueled global warming [16]. Low-income, rural populations are also at greater risk for the loss of livelihoods due to climate change, while their low-income urban counterparts face risk due to the fragility of housing and infrastructure in poor urban neighborhoods across the globe. We elaborate below on specific population groups that may be more vulnerable to adverse mental health outcomes as the result of climate migration and disrupted social networks. Finally, we discuss the practical implications of the research on climate change, social ties, migration, and mental health. In particular, we highlight the potential for leveraging novel technology in order to help maintain social ties in the context of climate migration.

The link between climate change and social ties

Climate change is expected to impact social relationships between family and community members (Fig. 1, path 1 → 2). In large part, these effects are expected to be negative. Reduced natural resources may lead to increased competition among community members for food, water, and livelihoods [17]. Acute climatic events may result in the loss of family dwellings and community meeting places, leading to reduced opportunity for social interaction, and increased social strain [14]. On the other hand, there is a strong call to acknowledge the role of individual and community resilience and adaptation in the face of climate change [18]. In particular, climatic events might have the capacity to strengthen family and community ties, provided there are opportunities to rebuild. Adaptation efforts prior to the onset of acute disasters or the most damaging effects of protracted climate changes may also provide opportunities for strengthening social ties. For example, Mathbor [19] describes that the Cyclone Preparedness Program in Bangladesh provides ongoing opportunities for interaction and trust-building among local volunteers, while also contributing to community preparedness for frequent cyclones. Evidence from other settings suggests that supportive community social ties (i.e., community social cohesion) serve as a source of resilience in the context of protracted and acute disasters. Social ties can facilitate the exchange of resources (e.g., food, shelter) and information (e.g., early warnings regarding environmental risks), and increase the likelihood of disaster preparedness [20, 21].

The importance of climate for migration

Although migration patterns are complex and multi-causal, environmental conditions have always been an important driver of individual and population-level mobility [22] (Fig. 1, path 1 → 3). Nevertheless, rapid anthropogenic change in climate patterns and an increase in climatic events are likely to contribute to population mobility above current levels. In a recent example, Syria experienced the most severe drought in recorded history from 2006 through 2007, the result of both cyclical and long-term declines in precipitation and groundwater. The drought contributed to the collapse of small and mid-scale agriculture and the migration of 1.5 million Syrians from rural areas to urban peripheries [23]. While no certainty exists regarding the direct, causal effects of climate change on migration, in this and other examples non-cyclical climatic change is a contributing factor, and climate-related resettlement has commenced globally [24].

Climate-related population mobility may take many forms. Circular migration, defined as fluid movement between countries, may entail short- or long-term moves and is often linked to labor demands in places of destination [25]. Temporary or permanent movement of individuals or entire families may occur as the result of either protracted or acute climatic events. In the most extreme form, planned permanent resettlement may lead to the relocation of entire communities, as with low-lying coastal or island populations [26]. These migration patterns are not mutually exclusive: in the aftermath of the same climatic event, some members of a community may temporarily move while others may permanently resettle elsewhere if the economic and social benefits of staying in their new location outweigh the perceived benefits of returning home [27]. Population mobility may also occur within countries or internationally, although climate-related migration has been linked primarily to internal (i.e., within-country) migration [28].

Finally, environmental factors may intersect with other micro- (e.g., family) and macro-level (e.g., national policy) circumstances to influence population mobility [29]. We discuss the intersection between environmental and social factors below. However, we note that political, economic, and demographic factors may also critically influence population vulnerability to climate change, and environmental migration patterns. In charting the aftermath of the recent historic drought in Syria, Kelley and authors [23] describe that the collapse of much of the country’s agricultural production. Mass rural-to-urban internal migration also occurred in the context of the Syrian government’s restrictive economic policies that exacerbated food shortages, as well an influx of Iraqi refugees that may have strained resources. The intersection of climate change with these factors contributed to the Syrian civil conflict, which has in turn triggered mass population displacement. In another example from Pakistan, two consecutive years of flooding (2010–2011) combined with deforestation and a nascent national disaster response system, resulted in mass displacement of 150,000 people to relief camps [30].

The importance of social ties for climate-related migration

Scholars have long emphasized the influence of social ties on population mobility patterns (Fig. 1, path 2 → 3). Individuals with prior migration experience serve as a source of information about the migration passage and expected outcomes (e.g., the availability of jobs) [8]. The desire to reunify with family or community members may also motivate migration. However, there is increasing recognition of the intersection of social and environmental migration drivers (Fig. 1, path 1,2 → 3). For example, in West Africa, Bassett and Turner found that drought-motivated adaptive migration of Fulbe herders from the Sudano-Sahelian to the Sudano-Guinean region only occurred because of the long-term development of social networks between migrants and non-migrants through trade and seasonal grazing [31]. In another example, a study of the effect of rainfall patterns on Mexican migration to the U.S. found that Mexican residents were more likely to migrate after years of drought only if they lived in regions with historically high levels of U.S. migration [32]. Individuals from these regions likely had strong ties to migrant family or community members, which facilitated the process of migration and lowered the economic barriers to doing so. For individuals living in regions with lower levels of prior U.S. migration–and likely fewer social ties to individuals with migration experience–drought actually predicted lower out-migration, given that drought likely reduced the economic resources necessary for migration.

Social ties can influence population mobility beyond migration for labor or family reunification. In an example of environmentally-motivated migration, by the early 1930s, over 60,000 people from Oklahoma had resettled in California as part of the Dust Bowl migration [33]. These early migrants guided new arrivals to find housing, employment, and to integrate with the host population. Similarly, during acute weather events, individuals may decide whether and where to move based on information gathered from people in their social networks [34].

The relationship between social ties and environmental migration is not always direct and positive. It may be complicated by specific characteristics of social relationships and the ability of these ties to provide assistance. Findings from research predicting environmentally motivated internal migration within Bangladesh suggest that having family and community members with previous migration experience was associated with increased likelihood of making temporary rather than permanent moves [35]. However, when respondents reported receiving financial assistance from family members living in destination communities they were more likely to settle permanently rather than engage in temporary, circular migration patterns.

Migration and disrupted social ties

The very same social ties that shape population mobility may be disrupted in the process of migration or displacement (Fig. 1, path 3 → 4). Family and community members may face temporary or long-term separation if some move while others remain in places of origin [36]. In other cases, the process of fleeing acute disasters and conflict may disperse family and community members. Once separated, refugees and other displaced persons may face substantial administrative barriers to reunifying even with immediate family members in other countries. For example, documents that serve as evidence of biological family connection and dependency (e.g., birth certificates) may be lost or destroyed in acute disaster settings [37]. Even if immediate family members can migrate together or to reunite after separation, extended or non-biological family and community members may be geographically dispersed as the result of administrative assignment to different destination countries and communities, as with refugee resettlement “lottery” programs.

Migrants may maintain a connection to extended family and community members by communicating through letters, telephone and, increasingly, mobile applications that allow for affordable video-conferencing and text messaging [10]. These ongoing social connections may be paired with continued economic connection; migrants remitted $601 billion dollars in 2015 [38]. While these remittances play a critical role in providing for the basic needs of those who remain in places of origin, they also can have important symbolic and emotional value for connecting those who send and receive them [39]. Finally, migrants and displaced persons may in some cases make return visits to places of origin, although the option to return may be limited by ongoing conflict in places of origin or political barriers to mobility (e.g., for undocumented migrants). On the other hand, places of origin may no longer be safe to return to, or may no longer exist, as with low-lying island and delta regions that are expected to be submerged by rising sea levels over the course of the twenty-first century [26, 40].

In addition to facing the potential disruption of extended family and community networks, migrants and displaced persons face challenges to developing novel social ties in destination communities. Migrants and displaced persons often face societal stigma and marginalization as well as social isolation. Social marginalization may compound the lack of legal protections currently afforded to those displaced by climatic factors. Indeed, those displaced by climate change are not formally protected under international refugee law [41] and may face limited options for political and social integration into destination societies.

Migration, disrupted social ties, and adverse mental health

Regardless of the stimulus for migration, recent literature finds some evidence of poorer mental health and wellbeing among migrants and displaced populations relative to populations of non-movers in countries and communities of origin [4244]. For example, a cross-national study found that Mexican migrants to the U.S. had higher levels of depression compared to their counterparts who never left Mexico [45]. Migration may contribute to adverse mental health outcomes through a number of potential mechanisms, including exposing populations in motion to traumatic circumstances along the migration passage and discriminatory attitudes and treatment in places of destination. Scholars have also noted that there may be unique, adverse mental health consequences of losing access to the natural landscape [46]. Albrecht and authors have captured this phenomenon with the term “solastalgia” or a sense of distress and melancholy related to the environmental destruction of one’s home [47].

Migration may also adversely impact mental health by disrupting social and community connections (Fig. 1, path 4 → 5). Separation from one’s close family members due to a disaster or conflict may be an acute stressor with both short and long-term impacts on mental health outcomes. Disrupted social ties may contribute to adverse mental health outcomes through mechanisms of social isolation and reduced social and material (e.g., informational, financial) support [48]. Separation from members of one’s origin family or community may also lead to a reduced sense of belonging within a familial, regional, or ethnic network, which may contribute to poorer mental health [49]. Migration-related separation may compound the impact of adverse experiences related to climate change, including the trauma of acute weather events, food and water insecurity, the loss of one’s land or home, and reduced social cohesion as the result of increased competition for basic resources such as food and water [14, 50].

Nevertheless, the impact of migration on mental health may vary. A study of Tongan migrants to New Zealand, with rigorous attention to migration selection based on mental health (i.e., the possibility that individuals who move have systematically different pre-migration mental health than non-movers), found evidence of significantly improved mental health among migrants relative to those who remained in Tonga [51]. Although, in this case, all migrants moved with their immediate family members and many explicitly cited an improved “social life” as their motivation for migration. The mental health impacts of population mobility may, therefore, depend on how disruptive moves are to existing social ties, in addition to other factors such as whether moves are temporary or permanent, and the potentially traumatic exposures endured prior to or during migration or displacement.

Social cohesion represents a key component in supporting psychological outcomes of populations affected by disasters and displacement. Using data collected both before and after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, Hikichi and colleagues found that higher levels of pre-earthquake social cohesion were protective of post-disaster adverse mental health outcomes [52]. Likewise, individuals who were both displaced from their homes after Hurricane Katrina and lived in counties with low social cohesion, measured as an aggregate of individual perceptions of community trust and support, had significantly higher odds of past-month depression compared to those who experienced only displacement or low social cohesion [53]. Even in the absence of climate-related migration or resettlement, these examples underscore the benefit of strengthening social ties.

Migration, disrupted social ties, and the mental health of those who remain

There may be adverse mental health consequences of population mobility for those who do not move (Figure 1, path 4 → 5). In some cases, entire households may migrate or be displaced. In other cases, some members migrate temporarily or permanently to seek out alternative livelihoods while some family members remain behind. Evidence is mixed on the effect of family member migration or displacement on the health of those who remain. On the one hand, the out-migration of family members has been linked to increased depression and other mental health disorders for those who remain behind. For example, the Three Gorges Dam in China, built to provide renewable energy, forced over a million people to relocate and degraded the surrounding environment. Researchers found evidence of a significant increase in depression in those who remained behind during the Three Gorges Dam project [54]. The results of the same analysis suggested that the effects of relocation on depression for those who remained may have been partially mediated by changes in personal resources, including household income and perceived social support. On the other hand, researchers have also reported no change in depression or even lower levels of depression as the result of family member out-migration in other contexts [55].

The adverse mental health consequences of migration-related separation for those who remain in places of origin may be compounded by other climate-related vulnerabilities. These may include the loss of livelihoods, lack of access to food and clean water, and civil conflict. Environmental changes may degrade familiar landscapes, cultural heritage sites, and alter patterns of socialization, with negative implications for mental wellbeing even among those who do not migrate [47, 56].

In the context of climate change, migration-related economic opportunities may become of increasing importance to those who remain in places of origin as livelihoods, food, and water supplies are threatened. Remittances sent back to communities of origin may support climate adaptation [57]. For example, migrants and “hometown” organizations can support water and irrigation projects in places of origin that may help individuals cope with the effects of climate change. Some of these development projects, such as renewable energy efforts, may have co-benefits for climate change mitigation.

Implications for practice and research

There are important practical implications that emerge from an understanding of the centrality of social ties for population mobility and population mental health. International aid organizations are already involved in re-connecting family members who have been separated by large-scale population mobility or natural disasters. Historically, the Restoring Family Links program through the International Committee of the Red Cross has transmitted letters between refugees, displaced persons, and their family members [58].

Mobile technologies have become increasingly critical for refugees and migrants seeking to reunite with family members in these acute disaster contexts [58, 59]. For example, Google People Finder was used to locate missing individuals in the aftermath of the 2011 earthquake in Japan. The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) has developed RapidFTR (or Rapid Family Tracing and Reunification), an open-source mobile phone application to help reunite children with their caregivers in disaster settings (https://github.com/rapidftr/RapidFTR/wiki). Another online platform, the Refugee United Project, allows individuals to register in and search through a database to trace missing family members. Other technological advances, like unmanned aerial vehicles that provide post-disaster communications networks [60], may also support maintenance of social ties.

Collaboration between international organizations, national governments, and the private sector will further serve to incorporate rapidly developing technological advances into efforts to re-connect mobile populations [58] as well as providing long-term resources for maintaining everyday social and economic ties, given the potentially protracted nature of many migratory flows. For example, the World Bank has partnered with national authorities to understand the potential for leveraging mobile technologies to decrease the excess cost of sending remittances, e.g., via smartphone applications that allow migrants to compare international money transfer fees across multiple financial agencies [61]. Again, remittances represent an important economic connection between migrants and their family and community members who remain in places of origin, but also have important symbolic value for family members seeking to maintain social connection in the aftermath of migration [39]. These collaborative efforts should also include evaluation, as there is little empirical evidence of the effectiveness of technology-driven strategies for maintaining and/or strengthening social ties disrupted due to migration or displacement.

Climate change may result in other large infrastructure adaptation projects like sea walls and dams that displace entire communities. Investments in enhancing community social cohesion would benefit population mental health both before and after individuals move. Evidence from Three Gorges Dam suggests that even anticipating the large-scale displacement of one’s community is associated with significantly increased depression [62]. While other cases of planned resettlement have thus far been rare, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has awarded its first grant aimed at resettling an island-dwelling community in Louisiana. One of the guiding principles for carrying out this voluntary resettlement is that “activities must include building and bridging social networks as part of the process and outcome,” which if followed should benefit the mental health of relocated individuals [63]. This case provides a critical opportunity to track the impact of planned climate-related resettlement on social ties and mental health, and to evaluate policies aimed at maintaining social networks throughout the resettlement process.

Even among those who have been temporarily displaced by acute climate events, efforts may aim to maintain and strengthen community social ties. For example, mental health interventions targeting those who survived the 2004 tsunami in India included individual therapy, but also engaged community members in re-building and activities that provided survivors with a sense of purpose (e.g., caring for children) and generated social cohesion [64]. Ongoing efforts must implement and evaluate programs that strengthen social cohesion in the face of lost livelihoods and population mobility.

For those who are permanently displaced, public and private-sector efforts may support social integration within destination communities. Some qualitative evidence suggests that mobile technologies may be critical for facilitating social connection between newly arrived refugees and those in the host societies [65]. Several online platforms serve to integrate refugees into destination communities. With the slogan “connecting people, creating networks,” Refugee Start Force (https://refugeestartforce.eu/) uses their online platform and groups on networking sites like Facebook and LinkedIn to connect refugees with professional opportunities in the Netherlands. Airbnb, the popular online lodging rental site, has created a response tool that when activated in the aftermath of disasters allows hosts to open their homes to displaced persons free of charge ​(https://www.airbnb.com/welcome). In Germany, Help To (http://helpto.de/en) offers a range of services to refugees including offers of and requests for legal advice, donations, and transportation. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, there is currently no empirical evidence of the effectiveness of these programs. Moreover, these novel efforts should not supplant public policy efforts to integrate migrants and refugees, as there is evidence of the causal effect of naturalization on increased social integration, particularly for the most marginalized migrants [66].

Strengthened social ties between migrants and those living in destination or settlement communities might have additional important co-benefits for population health. For example, social isolation is a key risk factor for heat-related health problems. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for preventing heat-related illness include buddy systems and formal check-ins with vulnerable persons; efforts that draw in part upon existing social ties among family and neighbors [67]. Such network-building to address climate change might also create greater community social cohesion, and consequently, improve population mental health.

Special considerations for vulnerable populations

Certain populations are expected to face a disproportionate share of adverse health outcomes resulting from climate change and increased population mobility. Climate change itself may also compound population vulnerability over time as feedback loops erode economic, social, and political conditions [68]. Indigenous communities face particular threats related to food insecurity and loss of native lands, although local knowledge may aid adaptation [69, 70]. Older adults in general face greater health risks in the context of climate change and older migrants may also experience high levels of social isolation in reception communities and reduced social support in places of origin if family members migrate [71]. Children also face considerable vulnerability in the context of climate migration, including potential separation from primary caregivers and the disruption of educational trajectories, which may, in turn, have lasting, adverse mental health consequences [72].

For those living in poverty, efforts to facilitate continued social and economic ties among mobile populations are critical. Remittances sent from migrants to origin communities provide resources to those not covered by formal, social safety net programs [73]. On the other hand, the obligation to remit may represent a substantial financial burden for migrants, many of who are laboring in low-wage sectors. While there is some evidence linking remittance sending to improved mental health among remittance-senders [74], others have reported the opposite effect [75]. Adverse mental health effects of remittance sending appear particularly strong among women, who may bear a larger burden of maintaining family networks and providing emotional and financial resources to family members who have remained behind [49].

Conclusion

Although estimates remain uncertain, climate change is expected to result in human migration above current levels. This increased population mobility is a potentially important mechanism linking climate change and population mental health. One pathway by which environmentally-motivated migration may negatively impact mental health is through the disruption of existing family and community ties. The disruption of these social ties may adversely impact migrants or displaced persons, potentially compounding the effects of other adversities, including traumatic experiences before and during the migration passage. Disrupted social ties resulting from out-migration may also impact those who remain in communities of origin, including populations already facing the loss of livelihood, natural landscapes, and cultural heritage sites as the result of climate change. Reconnecting and strengthening social ties in both origin and destination communities may increase resilience and buffer some of the adverse mental health impacts of acute and protracted climate events. Relevant strategies may increasingly involve leveraging novel technologies. Nevertheless, there is a need for rigorous evaluation of the effectiveness of these technologies for improving social cohesion and/or mental health for mobile populations and their family members. In addition, strategies to promote social connectedness should factor in the potential for social and economic strain among migrants and displaced persons. In particular, the obligation to remit to family and friends who remain may represent a substantial financial burden for migrants.

The costs and effort related to supporting migrants and displaced persons should reflect global responsibility for the consequences of climate change. Indeed, environmental injustice led to anthropogenic climate change. Greenhouse gas emissions that drive climate change have simultaneously propelled the economic growth of wealthy countries and individuals [57]. Now, developing countries and the poor will experience the greatest impacts, including increased risk for displacement, disrupted social ties, and adverse mental health consequences. It is a matter of social justice to invest in the mental health of these populations in motion. This includes implementing strategies that support and strengthen existing social ties as well as efforts that enhance social integration within destination communities for migrants who may be permanently displaced from places of origin.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Shang Yip for his assistance with the literature review. The authors also thank Sarah Meyer, Rachel Morello-Frosch, and Jonathan Samet for reading earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Funding

At the time of writing this manuscript the authors were supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholars program. The opinions expressed in this manuscript do not necessarily reflect the views of the RWJF Health & Society Scholars program. Publication made possible in part by support from the Berkeley Research Impact Initiative (BRII) sponsored by the UC Berkeley Library.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

JT and JC jointly conceived the idea of the article. Both authors conducted the literature review. JT led writing the manuscript with contributions from JC. Both JT and JC revised the manuscript content. Both authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health and Society Scholars Program, and the Center for Health & Community, University of California, San Francisco
(2)
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health and Society Scholars Program and the Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California

References

  1. IPCC. Climate change. Mitigation of climate change: contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Kopp RE, Kemp AC, Bittermann K, Horton BP, Donnelly JP, Gehrels WR, et al. Temperature-driven global sea-level variability in the common era. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(11):E1434–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Parris A, P. Bromirski, V. Burkett, D. Cayan, M. Culver, J. Hall, R. Horton, K. Knuuti,, R. Moss JO, A. Sallenger, and J. Weiss. Global sea level rise scenarios for the US national climate assessment; 2012. https://scenarios.globalchange.gov/sites/default/files/NOAA_SLR_r3_0.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2016.
  4. Hunter LM, Luna JK, Norton RM. Environmental dimensions of migration. Ann Rev Sociol. 2015;41:377–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. Global estimates 2015: people displaced by disasters; 2015. http://www.internal-displacement.org/assets/library/Media/201507-globalEstimates-2015/20150713-global-estimates-2015-en-v1.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. Bohra-Mishra P, Oppenheimer M, Hsiang SM. Nonlinear permanent migration response to climatic variations but minimal response to disasters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(27):9780–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Black R, Bennett SRG, Thomas SM, Beddington JR. Migration as adaptation. Nature. 2011;478:447–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Massey DS, Arango J, Hugo G, Kouaouci A, Pellegrino A, Taylor JE. Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal. Pop Dev Rev. 1993;19(3):431–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kawachi I, Berkman LF. Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health. 2001;78(3):458–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Waldinger R. The cross-border connection: immigrants, emigrants, and their homelands. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Woodward A, Smith KR, Campbell-Lendrum D, Chadee DD, Honda Y, Liu Q, et al. Climate change and health: on the latest IPCC report. Lancet. 383(9924):1185–9.Google Scholar
  12. Frumkin H, Hess J, Luber G, Malilay J, McGeehin M. Climate change: the public health response. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(3):435–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Hsiang SM, Burke M, Miguel E. Quantifying the influence of climate on human conflict. Science. 2013;341(6151):1235367.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Clayton S, Manning C. M., Krygsman, K., & Speiser, M. Mental health and our changing climate: impacts, implications, and guidance. American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica: Washington, D.C; 2017. http://ecoamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ea_apa_mental_health_report_web.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2017Google Scholar
  15. Ferrari AJ, Charlson FJ, Norman RE, Patten SB, Freedman G, Murray CJL, et al. Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Med. 2013;10(11):e1001547.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Althor G, Watson JEM, Fuller RA. Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20281.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Gleick PH. The implications of global climatic changes for international security. Clim Chang. 1989;15(1):309–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tanner T, Lewis D, Wrathall D, Bronen R, Cradock-Henry N, Huq S, et al. Livelihood resilience in the face of climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2015;5:23–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mathbor GM. Enhancement of community preparedness for natural disasters: the role of social work in building social capital for sustainable disaster relief and management. Int Soc Work. 2007;50(3):357–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Eisenman DP, Glik D, Gonzalez L, Maranon R, Zhou Q, Tseng CH, et al. Improving Latino disaster preparedness using social networks. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(6):512–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science. 2005;309(5737):1036–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Piguet E. From “primitive migration” to “climate refugees”: the curious fate of the natural environment in migration studies. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2013;103(1):148–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelley CP, Mohtadi S, Cane MA, Seager R, Kushnir Y. Climate change in the fertile crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(11):3241–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. de Sherbinin A, Castro M, Gemenne F, Cernea MM, Adamo S, Fearnside PM, et al. Preparing for resettlement associated with climate change. Science. 2011;334(6055):456–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. IOM. Key migration terms. International Organization for Migration; 2017. www.iom.int/key-migration-terms. Accessed April 1, 2017.
  26. McIver L, Kim R, Woodward A, Hales S, Spickett J, Katscherian D, et al. Health impacts of climate change in Pacific Island countries: a regional assessment of vulnerabilities and adaptation priorities. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(11):1707–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sastry N, Gregory J. The location of displaced New Orleans residents in the year after Hurricane Katrina. Demography. 2014;51(3):753–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Findlay AM. Migration destination in an era of environmental change. Glob Environ Change. 2011;21(S1):S50–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Burrows K, Kinney PL. Exploring the climate change, migration and conflict nexus. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(4):443.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Bhattacharyya A, Werz M. Climate change, migration and conflict in South Asia. Washington, DC: Centre for American Progress; 2012. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2012/12/03/46382/climate-change-migration-and-conflict-in-south-asia/. Accessed April 12, 2017Google Scholar
  31. Bassett TJ, Turner MD. Sudden shift or migratory drift? Fulbe herd movement to the Sudano-Guinean region of West Africa. Hum Ecol. 2007;35:33–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hunter LM, Murray S, Riosmena F. Rainfall patterns and U.S. migration from rural Mexico. Int Migr Rev. 2013;47(4):874–909.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. McLeman R, Smit B. Migration as an adaptation to climate change. Clim Chang. 2006;76(1):31–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Eisenman DP, Cordasco KM, Asch S, Golden JF, Glik D. Disaster planning and risk communication with vulnerable communities: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(S1):S109–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Joarder MA, Miller PW. Factors affecting whether migration is temporary or permanent: evidence from Bangladesh. Glob Environ Chang. 2013;23:1511–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Suárez-Orozco C, Bang HJ, Kim HY. I felt like my heart was staying behind: psychological implications of family separations and reunifications for immigrant youth. J Adoles Res. 2011;26(2):222–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Refugee family reunification: UNHCR's response to the European Commission green paper on the right to family reunification of third country nationals living in the European Union (directive 2003/86/EC). Geneva: UNHCR; 2012. http://www.unhcr.org/4f54e3fb13.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2017.
  38. World Bank. Migration and remittances fact book. Third ed. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group; 2016. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/334934-1199807908806/4549025-1450455807487/Factbookpart1.pdf. Accessed 1 Apr 2017.
  39. Mckenzie S, Menjívar C. The meanings of migration, remittances and gifts: views of Honduran women who stay. Global Networks. 2010;11(1):63–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Strauss BH, Kulp S, Levermann A. Carbon choices determine US cities committed to futures below sea level. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(44):13508–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams A. Turning the tide: recognizing climate change refugees in international law. Law & Policy. 2008;30(4):502–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Borges G, Medina-Mora ME, Breslau J, Aguilar-Gaxiola S. The effect of migration to the United States on substance use disorders among returned Mexican migrants and families of migrants. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(10):1847–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Goldman N, Pebley AR, Creighton MJ, Teruel GM, Rubalcava LN, Chung C. The consequences of migration to the United States for short-term changes in the health of Mexican immigrants. Demography. 2014;51(4):1159–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Cantor-Graae E, Pedersen CB. Full spectrum of psychiatric disorders related to foreign migration: a Danish population-based cohort study. JAMA Psychiat. 2013;70(4):427–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Breslau J, Borges G, Tancredi D, Saito N, Kravitz R, Hinton L, et al. Migration from Mexico to the United States and subsequent risk for depressive and anxiety disorders: a cross-national study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(4):428–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Snodgrass JG, Upadhyay C, Debnath D, Lacy MG. The mental health costs of human displacement: a natural experiment involving indigenous Indian conservation refugees. World Dev Perspect. 2016;2:25–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Albrecht G, Sartore G-M, Connor L, Higginbotham N, Freeman S, Kelly B, et al. Solastalgia: the distress caused by environmental change. Australas Psychiatry. 2007;15(sup1):S95–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(2):145–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Torres JM, Lee A, González HM, Garcia L, Haan MN. A longitudinal analysis of cross-border ties and depression for Latino adults. Soc Sci Med. 2016;160:111–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Berry HL, Bowen K, Kiellstrom T. Climate change and mental health: a causal pathways framework. Int J Public Health. 2010;55(2):123–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stillman S, McKenzie D, Gibson J. Migration and mental health: evidence from a natural experiment. J Health Econ. 2009;28:677–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Hikichi H, Aida J, Tsuboya T, Kondo K, Kawachi I. Can community social cohesion prevent posttraumatic stress disorder in the aftermath of a disaster? A natural experiment from the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(10):902–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Lê F, Tracy M, Norris FH, Galea S. Displacement, county social cohesion, and depression after a large-scale traumatic event. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48(11):1729–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Hwang S-S, Cao Y, Xi J. Project-induced migration and depression: a panel analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1765–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Abas M, Tangchonlatip K, Punpuing S, Jirapramukpitak T, Darawuttimaprakorn N, Prince M, et al. Migration of children and impact on depression in older parents in rural Thailand, Southeast Asia. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(2):226–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tschakert P, Tutu R, Alcaro A. Embodied experiences of environmental and climatic changes in landscapes of everyday life in Ghana. Emot Space Soc. 2013;7:13–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Scheffran J, Marmer E, Sow P. Migration as a contribution to resilience and innovation in climate adaptation: social networks and co-development in Northwest Africa. Appl Geogr. 2012;33:119–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Dubois O, Marshall K, McNamara SS. New technologies and new policies: the ICRC's evolving approach to working with separated families. Int Rev Red Cross. 2012;94(888):1455–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Kiama L, Mikkelsen C, Njeri C, Hansen M. The role of technology in family tracing in Kenya. Forced Migr Rev. 2011;38:35–6.Google Scholar
  60. Tuna G, Nefzi B, Conte G. Unmanned aerial vehicle-aided communications system for disaster recovery. J Netw Comput Appl. 2014;41:27–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. World Bank, UK Aid. Migrants' remittances from the United Kingdom: international remittances and access to financial services for migrants in London, UK: a project greenback 2.0 report. London: World Bank Group & UK Aid; 2015. remittanceprices.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/migrants_remittances_uk.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2017Google Scholar
  62. Hwang S-S, Xi J, Cao Y, Feng X, Qiao X. Anticipation of migration and psychological stress and the Three Gorges dam project, China. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:1012–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Louisiana Office of Community Development Disaster Recovery Unit. Louisiana's strategic adaptations for future environments. Baton Rouge, LA: State of Louisiana; 2015. http://www.doa.la.gov/OCDDRU/NDRC/LASAFE_Report_Final.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2016Google Scholar
  64. Wickrama KAS, Wickrama T. Perceived community participation in tsunami recovery efforts and the mental health of tsunami-affected mothers: findings from a study in rural Sri Lanka. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011;57(5):518–27.Google Scholar
  65. Walker R, Koh L, Wollersheim D, Liamputtong P. Social connectedness and mobile phone use among refugee women in Australia. Health Soc Care Community. 2015;23(3):325–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Hainmueller J, Hangartner D, Pietrantuono G. Catalyst or crown: does naturalization promote the long-term social integration of immigrants? Am Pol Sci Rev. 2017;111(2): 256–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Climate change and extreme heat events; 2012. https://www.cdc.gov/climateandhealth/pubs/climatechangeandextremeheatevents.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2016.
  68. Ebi KL, Bowen K. Extreme events as sources of health vulnerability: drought as an example. Weather Clim Extremes. 2016;11:95–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Jacob C, McDaniels T, Hinch S. Indigenous culture and adaptation to climate change: sockeye salmon and the St’át’imc people. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang. 2010;15(8):859–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Adger WN, Barnett J, Brown K, Marshall N, O'brien K. Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat Clim Chang. 2013;3(2):112–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Wu Z, Penning MJ, Zeng W, Li S, Chappell NL. Relocation and social support among older adults in rural China. J Gerontol B: Psychol Sci Soci Sci. 2016;71(6):1108–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Ryan K. Unaccompanied and separated minors: a call for a multidisciplinary response to a humanitarian crisis. Migration Policy Practice. 2014;4(3):4–10.Google Scholar
  73. Hallegatte S, Bangalore M, Bonzanigo L, Fay M, Narloch U, Rozenberg J, et al. Climate change and poverty: an analytical framework. World Bank Group: Washington, D. C; 2014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Alcántara C, Chen C-N, Alegria M. Transnational ties and past-year major depressive episodes among Latino immigrants. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2015;21(3):486–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Amoyaw JA, Abada T. Does helping them benefit me? Examining the emotional cost and benefit of immigrants' pecuniary remittance behavior in Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2016;153(C):182–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017