Erratum to: Auxiliary midwives in hard to reach rural areas of Myanmar: filling MCH gaps
BMC Public Health volume 16, Article number: 1074 (2016)
In the publication of this article , the following percentage symbols were accidentally missed out from the ‘Results’ and ‘Discussion’ sections:
2. Becoming an auxiliary midwife: the pathways
…as 89 % reported…
3. AMW: contributions of and supports to AMW
…about 9 % of the respondents…
…such as technical supervision (99 %), refresher course (99 %), replenishment of AMW kits (96 %)…
4. AMW: Intention to stay
…if they needed to change their domicile (21 %)
…Naturally in Myanmar, 39 % of AMWs…
All the above have been updated in the original article.
Wangmo S, et al. Auxiliary midwives in hard to reach rural areas of Myanmar: filling MCH gaps. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:914. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3584-x.
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3584-x.
About this article
Cite this article
Wangmo, S., Suphanchaimat, R., Htun, W.M.M. et al. Erratum to: Auxiliary midwives in hard to reach rural areas of Myanmar: filling MCH gaps. BMC Public Health 16, 1074 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3747-9