Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence of short stature, underweight, overweight, and obesity among school children in Jordan

  • Ayman A. Zayed3Email author,
  • Abdallah M. Beano1,
  • Faris I. Haddadin1,
  • Sohab S. Radwan1,
  • Suhaib A. Allauzy1,
  • Motasem M. Alkhayyat1,
  • Zaid A. Al-Dahabrah1,
  • Yanal G. Al-Hasan1 and
  • Al-Motassem F. Yousef2
BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:1040

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3687-4

Received: 9 June 2016

Accepted: 20 September 2016

Published: 3 October 2016

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of short stature (SS) and underweight in Jordan on a national level is unknown. This study aimed to investigate, on a national level, the prevalence of short stature (SS), underweight, overweight, and obesity among school aged children in Jordan.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2015 to January 2016 and included 2702 subjects aged 6–17 years. Jordan was classified into 3 regions; North, Center (urban), and South (rural). Public and private schools were randomly selected from a random sample of cities from each region. The socioeconomic status of the sampling locations was assessed using several indicators including education, income, healthcare and housing conditions. For each participating subject, anthropometrics were obtained. SS, underweight, overweight and obesity were defined using Center of Disease Control’s (CDC) growth charts. Median Z-scores for each region, age and gender were calculated.

Results

The Central and Northern regions enjoyed higher socioeconomic status compared to rural Southern regions. The overall prevalence of SS, underweight, overweight, and obesity were 4.9 %, 5.7 %, 17.3 %, and 15.7 %, respectively. SS and underweight were most prevalent in the rural South, while obesity was highest in the Central region. Females were more likely to be overweight, while males were more likely to be obese. Private schools had higher prevalence of obesity and overweight than public ones.

Conclusions

Variations in height and weight among Jordanian school children might be affected by socioeconomic status.

Keywords

Jordan Short stature Underweight Overweight Obesity School children

Background

It is becoming increasingly apparent that different forms of childhood malnutrition, from short stature (SS) and underweight to overweight, are growing global health concerns affecting developed and developing countries alike [1, 2]. The rapidly growing prevalence rates of these conditions have prompted escalated concerns into finding effective solutions. Their danger is further accentuated by the myriad of detrimental effects they have on the individual’s well being on the short and long run. Short stature for example, has been shown to be associated with disorders of the cardiovascular system [3]. In addition, SS in females was shown to adversely affect the health and survival of her offspring [4]. It is also more prevalent in regions with high infectious disease rates [5], and is linked to impaired host immunity [6]. Children with SS usually enroll later in school compared to their healthy peers, and achieve lower overall years of education [7]. Overall, SS is still considered to be directly the result of chronic malnutrition [8], and it may, therefore, be considered an accurate indicator of childhood health and may reflect a child’s nutritional and environmental background adequately. Hence, knowledge of the prevalence of SS can be considered a first step in addressing childhood health concerns. The prevalence of SS varies significantly worldwide. To our knowledge, the highest prevalence of SS was reported in Bangladesh, being 73.6 % in 1991 [9]. On the other hand, the lowest prevalence of SS in Australia was 0 % in 1995 [9].

Similarly to SS, underweight is also considered a worldwide disease burden [10] and is mostly correlated to under nutrition and social deprivation [11]. It has been shown to be associated with long term adverse effects on school achievement, cognitive development and general health [11]. The highest prevalence of underweight children recorded worldwide was found to be in Bangladesh, being 66.8 % in 1985 [9].

Obesity, on the other end of the spectrum, is also associated with short and long term physical and psychosocial complications, ranging from increased risk for cardio-metabolic diseases to lower self esteem and educational attainment, as well as higher unemployment rates [12, 13]. Childhood obesity is also a strong predictor of adult obesity [12, 13], and is currently, alongside childhood overweight, more prevalent in developed countries [14]. However, this might change in the future, since developing countries have had a greater relative increase in the prevalence of childhood obesity and overweight from 1990 to 2010 compared to developed countries [14].

Several studies were conducted in Jordan that started the process of establishing the prevalence of obesity and overweight. However, they were not national; their targets were one or two governorates of the country [15]. Additionally, there are no available data regarding the prevalence of SS and underweight children in Jordan. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate, on a national level, the prevalence of SS, underweight and obesity among school children and adolescents in Jordan, and assess their association with gender, region (Northern, Central, and Southern regions), and school strata (private and public schools).

Methods

Subjects

After obtaining ethical approval from the scientific committee of the University of Jordan’s medical school, this nation-wide, cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2015 to January 2016 by the Endocrinology Division of the Jordan University Hospital, a tertiary medical center in Amman, Jordan. In total, 2702 children aged 6–17 years were enrolled in this study.

A random selection methodology was adopted. Jordan was classified into 3 regions; north, center, and south. All the major cities –i.e. those having a population of 100,000 or more– in each region were sorted alphabetically and given a numeric designation accordingly. Cities with odd numeric designations were selected (Fig. 1). Two school strata for each selected city were devised; public and private. Schools in either of these strata were again sorted alphabetically, and every 44th school was subsequently chosen from each stratum. All grades from the selected schools were included, and had there been more than one class division per grade, only the first class per grade –i.e. ‘Class A’– was included in the sample. The school students in their grades were sorted alphabetically and every 14th student was subsequently chosen. Due to logistic and administrative reasons among some schools, only 88 schools (49 public, 39 private) participated in the study out of 110 eligible schools (63 public, 47 private) (Table 1). The total number of participants was 3153; of those 451 could not participate because their parents did not provide written parental consent for them. Accordingly, 2702 subjects were enrolled in the study (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

A map of Jordan outlining the cities included in the study

Table 1

Distribution of Eligible and Participating Schools by City

Region

City/Town

Number of Schools

Number of Eligible Schoolsa

Participating Schools

Public

Private

Public

Private

Public

Private

North

Irbidb

509

429

11

10

9

8

Mafraqb

481

43

10

1

8

1

Jarashb

154

42

4

1

3

1

Ajlunb

98

41

2

1

1

1

Center

Ammanb

605

953

14

21

10

17

Saltb

181

135

4

3

3

2

Zarqab

279

243

6

5

5

4

Madabab

99

41

2

1

2

1

South

Karakc

197

62

4

1

3

1

Tafilahc

89

16

2

1

2

1

Ma’anc

141

22

3

1

2

1

Aqabac

70

39

1

1

1

1

aEligible; public and private, schools were selected by sorting each stratum alphabetically and every 44th school was subsequently chosen from each stratum

bThe surrounding areas of these cities/towns were not included

cThe surrounding areas of these cities/towns were included

Fig. 2

A flowchart demonstrating how schools and their students were recruited. *Schools that could not participate due to logistic and administrative reasons. **Subjects who were excluded because of lack of written parental consent

Assessments

After acquiring informed, written parental consent for all participating subjects, anthropometrics were obtained for all those enrolled by trained, senior medical students from the University of Jordan, and the chronological age was calculated by using the date of birth. Each subject’s height was measured with his or her head in a Frankfurt Plane and the occiput, shoulder, buttocks, and heels contacting a vertical board. Each subject was drawn up to full height by placing upward pressure on the mandible. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of weight to the square of height (kg/m2). Short stature was defined as a standing body height below the 5th percentile using Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) growth charts, corrected for age and gender. Obesity, overweight and underweight were defined as having a BMI greater than or equal to the 95th percentile, greater than or equal to the 85th percentile but less than the 95th percentile, and less than 5th percentile respectively using the CDC’s growth charts, corrected for age and gender.

Additionally, the sampling locations were studied from a socioeconomic point of view. The following indicators: education, income, healthcare and type of sewage system as an indicator of housing amenities, were assessed.

Statistical analysis

For each subject, a Z-score was calculated for each anthropometric value, including the weight, height, and BMI. An SAS script was used to calculate the Z-scores using the ‘LMS’ method, where:
$$ Z=\frac{\left[{\left(\frac{Value}{M}\right)}^L\right]-1}{L\times S},\ L\ne 0 $$

In the above equation, ‘value’ corresponds to the subject’s BMI, weight, or height. The L, M, and S values correspond to parameters extracted from the 2000 CDC percentile data tables and can vary according to the child’s sex, age, or height. Percentiles were then calculated from the corresponding Z-scores. Using the same method, median Z-scores for each region, age and gender were calculated using the 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) data tables, and those values were compared with median Z-scores calculated using the CDC’s 2000 data tables.

Pearson's Chi-Squared testing was performed to assess for differences in prevalence of SS, obesity, overweight, and underweight between regions, school stratum and gender, with p <0.05 being used to define significance.

Results

A total of 2702 school students aged 6–17 years were enrolled, of which 1328 (49.2 %) were males and 1374 (50.8 %) were females. The median age was 11.2 ± 3.7 years. The demographic distribution of the sample is illustrated in Fig. 3. The overall prevalence of SS in Jordan was 4.9 % (n = 133), with a larger proportion being found in Southern regions compared to the Northern and Central regions (7.0 %, 5.3 % and 3.4 % respectively, P-value <0.001) (Table 2). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the prevalence of SS among gender or school stratum.
Fig. 3

The prevalence of short stature, underweight, and obesity by age

Table 2

Prevalence of short stature, underweight, overweight, and obesity

 

Short staturea

Underweightb

Overweightc

Obesed

Characteristics

n (%)

p-value

n (%)

p-value

n (%)

p-value

n (%)

p-value

Region

 North

45 (5.3)

<0.001

55 (6.5)

0.04

149 (17.5)

0.21

121 (14.2)

0.021

 Center

39 (3.4)

53 (4.6)

188 (16.3)

208 (18.1)

 South

49 (7.0)

46 (6.6)

126 (18.0)

76 (10.8)

School stratum

 Public

70 (5.1)

0.71

80 (5.8)

0.69

215 (15.6)

0.047

129 (9.4)

<0.001

 Private

63 (4.8)

74 (5.6)

248 (18.7)

276 (20.8)

Gender

 Male

68 (5.1)

0.61

82 (6.2)

0.15

203 (15.3)

0.018

251 (18.9)

<0.001

 Female

65 (4.7)

72 (5.2)

260 (18.9)

154 (11.2)

a Short stature defined as height-for-age <5th percentile

b Underweight defined as BMI-for-age <5th percentile

c Overweight defined as BMI-for-age ≥85th percentile and < 95th percentile

d Obesity defined as BMI-for-age ≥95th percentile

Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, n number

The overall prevalence of underweight subjects was 5.7 %. The rates were similar among both genders and both school strata. However, it was found that the Central region had a lower prevalence of 4.6 % compared to the Southern and Northern regions where the prevalence was 6.6 and 6.5 %, respectively (P-value = 0.04).

Obesity was recorded among 15.7 % of the total sample and was most prevalent in Central towns with 18.1 % of children crossing the cut-offs detailed in the table for BMI for age. A higher prevalence of obesity was also found in children enrolled in private schools with 20.8 % found to be obese compared to 9.4 % in public schools (P-value <0.001). Likewise, a higher prevalence of obesity was found among males, with 18.9 % being obese compared to 11.2 % of females (P-value <0.001). Furthermore, the Central region had a higher prevalence than either the Northern or the Southern region (18.1 %, 14.2 %, 10.8 %, respectively, P-value = 0.021).

In contrast to obesity, the overall prevalence of overweight was 17.3 % and it was not significantly associated with the region (P-value = 0.21), and females were more likely to be overweight compared to males (18.9 and 15.3 %, respectively, P-value = 0.018). Additionally, the prevalence of overweight children was higher in private schools as compared to public ones (18.7 %, 15.6 %, respectively, P-value = 0.047).

Overall, the median Z-scores for the whole sample were above reference values for height-, weight-, and BMI-for-age in both genders, according to the CDC and WHO references (Table 3). Male subjects had a higher than reference median Z-scores compared to their female counterparts in each of the three categories. Moreover, it was found that both the CDC and WHO references were in agreement to each other for median Z-scores for height-for-age in females with scores of 0.16 and 0.15 respectively. For males, however, the CDC and WHO references were 0.33 and 0.43, respectively. Median female Z-scores were also closest to mean reference values beyond the age of 10 and 12 years for height-for-age in WHO and CDC charts, respectively. However, no similar pattern was found among males. Regarding BMI-for-age, median Z-scores in both CDC and WHO references had a progressive increase from age 6–10 years in males, followed by a progressive decline from age 11–15. Females, however, had no consistent pattern across the array of ages.
Table 3

Comparison of median Z-scores with the 2000-CDC and the 2007-WHO growth charts

 

Median Z-scores

Height for age

Weight for age

BMI for age

CDC

WHO

CDC

WHO

CDC

WHO

Age

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

All

0.33

0.16

0.43

0.15

0.73

0.42

0.83

0.71

0.64

0.39

0.84

0.53

6

0.71

0.58

0.61

0.55

0.52

0.65

0.61

0.68

0.22

0.63

0.27

0.49

7

0.37

0.60

0.37

0.75

0.58

0.48

0.68

0.60

0.46

0.50

0.50

0.50

8

0.69

0.81

0.82

0.91

0.94

0.68

1.11

0.91

0.79

0.23

0.88

0.33

9

0.21

0.51

0.38

0.62

0.73

1.01

0.94

1.31

1.11

1.23

1.23

1.48

10

0.18

0.15

0.33

0.09

1.02

0.48

1.21

0.77

1.22

0.61

1.43

0.77

11

0.19

0.17

0.26

0.09

0.82

0.59

-

-

1.12

0.69

1.42

0.81

12

0.11

0.06

0.10

0.05

0.66

0.32

-

-

0.88

0.37

1.07

0.41

13

0.48

0.05

0.53

0.14

0.70

0.60

-

-

0.71

0.59

0.87

0.62

14

0.24

0.04

0.34

0.01

0.55

0.45

-

-

0.67

0.58

0.75

0.54

15

0.11

0.03

0.08

0.04

0.59

0.37

-

-

0.51

0.44

0.59

0.37

16

0.15

0.03

0.19

0.02

0.49

0.32

-

-

0.68

0.40

0.82

0.35

17

0.06

0.05

0.09

0.08

0.38

0.33

-

-

0.32

0.21

0.44

0.35

Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, F female, M male, WHO World Health Organization

As far as the socioeconomic status of the sampling locations, Table 4 provides basic summary statistics of the included cities and towns based on some socioeconomic indicators. Those include education, income, healthcare and type of sewage system as an indicator of housing amenities. The provided indicators showed that Southern regions; mainly rural, have lower socioeconomic status compared with Central and Northern regions, which are more urbanized. This is reflected by the obvious differences in the number of tertiary and secondary care hospitals, private universities, income and type of sewage system. (Table 4) [16].
Table 4

Some Socioeconomic Indicators of the Studied Regionsa

Region

City/Town

Household memberb x1000

Public Schools

Private Schools

Public Univ.c

Private Univ.c

Tertiary Hosp.d,e

Secondary Hosp.d,e

% Households with annual income >6000 JDsf

Sewage System (Cesspool)

North

Irbid

1134

509

429

2

1

5

12

17.8

36

Mafraq

300

481

43

1

0

0

4

4.4

h

Jarash

190

154

42

0

1

0

2

3.2

h

Ajlun

147

98

41

0

1

0

1

2.9

h

Center

Amman

2449

605

953

2

13

10

40

38.8

20

Salt

426

181

135

1

0

0

2

5.7

43

Zarqa

947

279

243

1

1

1

7

15.5

14

Madaba

160

99

41

1

1

0

3

3.5

45

South

Karakg

248

197

52

1

0

0

0

2.8

92

Tafilahg

89

89

16

1

0

0

0

1.4

66

Ma’ang

121

141

22

1

0

0

0

1.7

50

Aqabag

138

70

31

1

0

0

0

2.7

14

aJordanian Departement of Statistics, http://web.dos.gov.jo/sectors/economic, 2013

bHousehold members were approximated to the closest 1000

cUniv. = Universities

dHosp. = Hospitals

eThe number of primary care hospitals were not included in the table

fJDs = Jordanian Dinar

gThe data of these towns include also their surroundings

hNo available data for these towns

Discussion

In this cross-sectional, nation-wide study, it was found that, among children and adolescents in Jordan, 4.9 % were of short stature, 5.7 % were underweight, 17.3 % were overweight, and 15.7 % were obese. Moreover, it was demonstrated that gender and the type of school attended were significantly associated with different prevalence rates of obesity and overweight. Additionally, rates of short stature, obesity, and underweight differed among the 3 different regions.

It was found that SS was most prevalent in rural provinces, with the Southern region having the highest prevalence, followed by the Northern region, and the Central region (7.0 %, 5.3 %, 3.4 %, respectively; p value <0.001). Gender, on the other hand, was not associated with the prevalence of SS; 5.1 % of the males had SS compared to 4.9 % of the females. Those gender-based prevalence rates lie within what has been reported in literature. The ‘Pro Child’ study, which spanned 9 European countries, found lower prevalence rates of short stature of 1.4 and 2.8 % in 11 year old males and females, respectively [17]. Another study from the West Bank, which neighbors Jordan, reported rates of 9.2 and 7.3 % among 13–15 year old males and females, respectively [18]. Underweight showed similar patterns of distribution to SS, with the Southern region again having the highest prevalence, followed by the Northern and Central regions (6.6 %, 6.5 %, 4.6 %, respectively, P-value = 0.04). Additionally, the prevalence was not associated with gender, with 6.5 % of males being underweight compared to 5.2 % of females (P-value = 0.15).

One possible explanation for the regional distribution patterns of short stature and underweight could lie in the effect socioeconomic status has on both of these conditions. It could be argued that the socioeconomic status of an individual has a major impact on the nutritional status and dietary habits of that individual, with suboptimal nutrition being more commonly expected among lower socioeconomic classes. Suboptimal nutrition is also expected to adversely affect health and growth. The effect of socioeconomic status can be further accentuated by the disparity of health and health care between areas of differing average income per household, as is the case between rural and urban areas, at least in Jordan. The Southern regions of Jordan are predominantly rural compared to the more affluent, urbanized Central region. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the prevalence rate of SS and underweight among the two genders. Similar findings regarding gender differences in SS were reported in studies conducted in neighboring countries. One study in Saudi Arabia reported no significant difference in the prevalence of SS between boys and girls (5–17 years of age) [19]. Another study in Ankara, Turkey investigated the prevalence of SS in 7–15 years school-aged children and also reported no gender differences regarding SS prevalence [20]. On the contrary, our findings are in contrast with two governorates from the West Bank; Ramallah and Hebron, in which prevalence of SS and underweight was higher among boys than girls [18]. Sharing a similar socioeconomic status as Jordan might be one reason why gender differences in regards to SS in Saudi Arabia and Turkey were consistent with our findings. However, socioeconomic status in the West Bank might differ when compared to Jordan’s due to a considerable geopolitical instability in that region. Furthermore, the data pointed to Jordan having a higher prevalence of SS than European countries [17], which enjoy a better standard of living, and lower than the West Bank [18], probably due to the reason mentioned above.

Previous studies conducted in China reported large discrepancies between rural and urban areas both in health conditions and in health care [21]. Despite improved children growth in all economic groups, a large growth disparity still exists between those Chinese rural and urban areas [22], and among the different economic subgroups within them [23, 24]. Additionally, several other reports shed some light on the contribution malnutrition has on the development of SS in the setting of socioeconomic difficulty. One study reported malnutrition as the third most common cause of SS [25], accounting for 9.8 % of the cases in Pakistan [25, 26]. In Brazil improving average socioeconomic status between 1975 and 2007 led to a reduction in the prevalence of SS by more than 80 % (from 37.1 to 7.1 %) [27]. Another study from Saudi Arabia found higher prevalence in the incidence of SS in the Southwestern region of Saudi Arabia compared to the rest of the country, citing the lower socioeconomic status of the area and its higher prevalence of malnutrition as possible causes [19]. A recent study conducted in England concluded that social inequalities reflected on the height of the children included in the study [28].

Another possible factor contributing to the patterns of SS and underweight distribution in our data could be the rate of consanguineous marriages in the Southern region, which is estimated to represent 35–55 % of all marriages in rural areas of Jordan [29, 30]. Consanguinity is associated with an increased probability of the propagation of recessive traits and diseases, some of which may adversely affect height and weight of children. For example, familial isolated growth hormone deficiency is one cause of SS with recessive inheritance patterns. A recent study which was conducted in Jordan among school children 6–16 years of age indicated that the prevalence of isolated growth hormone deficiency was significantly higher among short children of consanguineous marriage across all levels of consanguinity (86 %) than among the offspring of unrelated parents (50 %) [P = 0.001] [31]. Another study investigating the effect of inbreeding on the heights and weights of school children aged 5–15 years in Jammu (North India), reported that the mean difference in height, weight and BMI was −7.32 cm, −6.59 kg and −2.13 kg/m2 respectively for children of inbred families compared to those of non-inbred families [32].

A possibly interesting observation lies in that the prevalence of SS was highest among 12 year olds and lowest among 8 year olds. Compared to the Z-scores of the CDC and WHO growth charts, our sample’s height-for-age Z-scores for age 12 were significantly higher in males and females. However, for age 8, those values were close to the CDC’s and WHO’s values. One possible explanation for why the rates for SS were the highest at age 12 could be concerned with the national average age for onset of puberty. A previous unpublished study by A. Zayed pointed out that the average age of onset of puberty for the youth in Jordan was 14.2 years for males and 13.4 years for females. Compared to global averages, these figures are late. For example, delayed puberty in the US is defined as lack of signs of pubertal development by the age of 14 years for males and 13 years for females [33]. A delayed onset of puberty might also delay the pubertal growth spurt.

On the other end of the spectrum, it was found that 15.7 % of the studied subjects were obese, while 17.3 % were overweight. Analysis by gender showed that obesity was more prevalent among males, with 18.9 % being obese compared to 11.2 % of the females (P-value < 0.001). These figures and gender patterns appear to be similar to what was reported in literature. In one study performed in the United States, it was found that, in 2009–2010, 16.9 % of those aged 2–19 years were obese while 14.9 % were overweight. Further, it was noted that, in the same sample, the prevalence of obesity among males (18.6 %) was significantly higher than that among females (15.0 %) [34]. Figures in European countries, as reported by the ‘Pro Child’ study, appear to be lower than those reported in the United States, though the same pattern in gender difference persists; 5.6 % of the males included were obese while only 2.9 % of the females were so [17]. Another study conducted in Qatar that followed the International Obesity Taskforce’s (IOTF) guidelines found that 28.6 % of males aged 12–17 years were obese, while 7.6 % were overweight; compared to 18.6 and 4.7 %, respectively, of their female peers [35]. These differences in gender patterns could be explained through the effect gender identity has on body-image and how that is related to self esteem, with females being more likely to place a greater value on self body-image. One study found that adolescent females were more likely to associate body dissatisfaction with the concept of self-esteem [36]. Another study investigated the relationship between socioeconomic status, weight, age, gender, and body image in school children aged 6–19 years in New South Wales [37]. Their data indicated that the relationship between gender, body image and weight was significant in regards to overweight females being more likely than overweight males to report being ‘too fat’ (58.0 % vs. 36.5 %), while overweight males were more likely than their counterpart females to report their weight as ‘about right’ (59.0 % vs. 40.5 %) [37]. Moreover, the same study has also shown that overweight females were more likely to skip breakfast as well as be advised by others to lose weight (52.5 %) in comparison to overweight males (48.0 %) [37].

The discrepancy in health and health care between rural and urban areas seems to, again, influence the prevalence of obesity and overweight. In the data, this was reflected by a significantly higher prevalence of obesity in the urbanized Central region compared to the more rural Southern and Northern regions (18.1 %, 10.8 %, 14.2 %, respectively; P-value = 0.021). This trend has also been shown in a study conducted in China in 2010 in which the combined prevalence of overweight and obesity was found to be highest among urban boys (23.2 %), followed by rural boys (13.8 %), urban girls (12.7 %) and rural girls (8.6 %) [38]. It could be argued that despite the improvement in basic health infrastructure and health care access brought about by urbanization, the latter has also brought about changes in diet and lifestyle that might adversely affect health. These include the popularization of calorically dense food items and snacks and the tendency towards a sedentary lifestyle with the widespread use of automobiles, public transport services, and indoor entertainment media such as personal computers and televisions [39].

However, unlike the trends in SS and underweight prevalence, the data suggested an association between school strata and the rates of obesity and overweight. Among those attending private schools, 21.8 % were obese and 18.7 % were overweight, compared to 9.4 and 15.6 %, respectively, of their peers in public schools (P-value < 0.001 for the obese group comparison, and p < 0.047 for the overweight group comparison). This might point out to socioeconomic factors having an influence yet again; students attending private schools are more likely to come from more affluent backgrounds. Additionally, rural areas are more likely to have more public schools, where the tuition is offered for free, than private schools (Table 1). Of note, the tuition per one student in private schools ranges between 3000 and 20,000 JDs.

This study was the first, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to attempt at discerning the prevalence of SS in Jordan. Additionally, it was the first to investigate the prevalence of obesity, overweight, and underweight on a national scale in Jordan. However, results were limited by the cross-sectional nature of the study, which precluded any effort to study the causality between variables.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study outlined the differences in weight and height trends between genders and between different regions in Jordan. Our data showed that there was an increased prevalence of SS and underweight in rural areas. This might be attributed to low socioeconomic status and high rate of consanguineous marriages in those regions. On the contrary, higher socioeconomic status in urbanized regions might contribute to higher rates of obesity and overweight there. Further research in this subject is needed, with an emphasis on pinpointing and stratifying the underlying reasons for pervasive weight and height patterns, especially in association with differences between regions. Plans to handle these health conditions will have to take these differences into consideration. In addition, improvements in socioeconomic status and counseling regarding consanguineous marriages might aid in reducing the prevalence of SS and underweight.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

body mass index

CDC: 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

IOTF: 

International Obesity Taskforce

SAS: 

Statistical Analysis System

SS: 

short stature

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all participants for volunteering their time to make this study possible.

Funding

This study had no sources of funding.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available upon request to the authors.

Authors’ contributions

AAZ is the guarantor, designed the methodology, and edited and reviewed the manuscript. AMB contributed to manuscript preparation and literary review. FIH contributed to data collection, manuscript preparation and literary review. SSR contributed to manuscript preparation and literary review. SAA contributed to manuscript preparation and literary review. MMA contributed to manuscript preparation and literary review. ZAA contributed to manuscript preparation and literary review. YGA contributed to the statistical analysis. AFY contributed to the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the scientific committee of the University of Jordan’s (Amman, Jordan) medical school. Written parental consent for all participating subjects was obtained before any assessment was made.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Medicine, University of Jordan
(2)
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Jordan
(3)
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan/Jordan University Hospital

References

  1. Muller O, Krawinkel M. Malnutrition and health in developing countries. CMAJ. 2005;173(3):279–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Prentice AM. The emerging epidemic of obesity in developing countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(1):93–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schroeder DG, Martorell R, Flores R. Infant and child growth and fatness and fat distribution in Guatemalan adults. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149(2):177–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dewey KG, Begum K. Long-term consequences of stunting in early life. Matern Child Nutr. 2011;7 Suppl 3:5–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Onis M, Blossner M. The world health organization global database on child growth and malnutrition: methodology and applications. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(4):518–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Verhoef H, West CE, Veenemans J, Beguin Y, Kok FJ. Stunting may determine the severity of malaria-associated anemia in African children. Pediatrics. 2002;110(4):e48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Martorell R, Horta BL, Adair LS, Stein AD, Richter L, Fall CH, Bhargava SK, Biswas SK, Perez L, Barros FC, et al. Weight gain in the first two years of life is an important predictor of schooling outcomes in pooled analyses from five birth cohorts from low- and middle-income countries. J Nutr. 2010;140(2):348–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Frongillo Jr EA, Hanson KM. Determinants of variability among nations in child growth. Ann Hum Biol. 1995;22(5):395–411.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Joint Malnutrition dataset from UNICEF, World Bank and WHO: http://data.unicef.org/nutrition/malnutrition.html. Accessed 7 Aug 2016.
  10. Caulfield LE, de Onis M, Blossner M, Black RE. Undernutrition as an underlying cause of child deaths associated with diarrhea, pneumonia, malaria, and measles. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(1):193–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Armstrong J, Dorosty AR, Reilly JJ, Emmett PM. Child Health Information T: Coexistence of social inequalities in undernutrition and obesity in preschool children: population based cross sectional study. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(8):671–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Williams J, Wake M, Hesketh K, Maher E, Waters E. Health-related quality of life of overweight and obese children. JAMA. 2005;293(1):70–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Reilly JJ. Descriptive epidemiology and health consequences of childhood obesity. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;19(3):327–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. de Onis M, Blossner M, Borghi E. Global prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity among preschool children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(5):1257–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Abu Baker NN, Daradkeh SM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescents in Irbid governorate, Jordan. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(6):657–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jordanian Departement of Statistics, http://web.dos.gov.jo/sectors/economic, 2013. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.
  17. Yngve A, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Wolf A, Grjibovski A, Brug J, Due P, Ehrenblad B, Elmadfa I, Franchini B, Klepp KI, et al. Differences in prevalence of overweight and stunting in 11-year olds across Europe: the Pro children study. Eur J Public Health. 2008;18(2):126–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mikki N, Abdul-Rahim HF, Awartani F, Holmboe-Ottesen G. Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of stunting, underweight, and overweight among Palestinian school adolescents (13–15 years) in two major governorates in the West Bank. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):485.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. El Mouzan MI, Al Herbish AS, Al Salloum AA, Al Omer AA, Qurachi MM. Regional prevalence of short stature in Saudi school-age children and adolescents. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:505709.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Özdemir O, Erçevik E, Çalışkan D. Evaluation of pupil growth and development in two primary schools with different socioeconomic status. Ankara Univ Med Sch J. 2005;58:23–9.Google Scholar
  21. Yip WC, Hsiao WC, Chen W, Hu S, Ma J, Maynard A. Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet (London, England). 2012;379(9818):833–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Li H, Zong X, Zhang J, Zhu Z. Physical growth of children in urban, suburban and rural mainland China: a study of 20 years change. Biomed Environ Sci. 2011;24(1):1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cheng-ye J, Xin Z. Comparison of physical growth increments among Chinese urban student populations during 1985–2005. Chin J Sch Health. 2011;32(8):1164–7. 97.Google Scholar
  24. Cheng-ye J, Xiao-jian Y. Comparison of increments on physical growth among Chinese rural student populations during 1985–2005. Chin J Sch Health. 2011;32:1158–63.Google Scholar
  25. Sultan M, Afzal M, Qureshi SM, Aziz S, Lutfullah M, Khan SA, Iqbal M, Maqsood SU, Sadiq N, Farid N. Etiology of short stature in children. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008;18(8):493–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Waqar Rabbani M, Imran Khan W, Bilal Afzal A, Rabbani W. Causes of short stature identified in children presenting at a tertiary care hospital in Multan Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(1):53–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Monteiro CA, Benicio MH, Conde WL, Konno S, Lovadino AL, Barros AJ, Victora CG. Narrowing socioeconomic inequality in child stunting: the Brazilian experience, 1974–2007. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(4):305–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hancock C, Bettiol S, Smith L. Socioeconomic variation in height: analysis of National Child Measurement Programme data for England. Arch Dis Child. 2015;101(5):422–6.Google Scholar
  29. Taym M, Kassab M. The impact of consanguinity on children health in Jordan Valley. J Res Nurs Midwifery. 2012;1(5):62–8.Google Scholar
  30. Bener A, Hussain R, Teebi AS. Consanguineous marriages and their effects on common adult diseases: studies from an endogamous population. Med Princ Pract. 2007;16(4):262–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Zayed AA, Mustafa Ali MK, Al-Ani MA, Momani MS, Yousef AM. The prevalence of isolated growth hormone deficiency among children of short stature in Jordan and its relationship with consanguinity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014;81(6):876–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Fareed M, Afzal M. Evidence of inbreeding depression on height, weight, and body mass index: a population-based child cohort study. Am J Hum Biol. 2014;26(6):784–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Marcdante KJ, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB, Behrman RE. Nelson Essentials of Pediatrics. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2011.Google Scholar
  34. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012;307(5):483–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bener A. Prevalence of obesity, overweight, and underweight in Qatari adolescents. Food Nutr Bull. 2006;27(1):39–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Furnham A, Badmin N, Sneade I. Body image dissatisfaction: gender differences in eating attitudes, self-esteem, and reasons for exercise. J Psychol. 2002;136(6):581–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Dea JA, Caputi P. Association between socioeconomic status, weight, age and gender, and the body image and weight control practices of 6- to 19-year-old children and adolescents. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(5):521–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Cheng TO. Fast food, automobiles, television and obesity epidemic in Chinese children. Int J Cardiol. 2005;98(1):173–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang X, van der Lans I, Dagevos H. Impacts of fast food and the food retail environment on overweight and obesity in China: a multilevel latent class cluster approach. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(1):88–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement