Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Environmental predictors of stunting among children under-five in Somalia: cross-sectional studies from 2007 to 2010

  • 1Email author,
  • 2, 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6, 7, 8 and
  • 1, 3
BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:654

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3320-6

  • Received: 25 November 2015
  • Accepted: 16 July 2016
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Stunting among children under five years old is associated with long-term effects on cognitive development, school achievement, economic productivity in adulthood and maternal reproductive outcomes. Accurate estimation of stunting and tools to forecast risk are key to planning interventions. We estimated the prevalence and distribution of stunting among children under five years in Somalia from 2007 to 2010 and explored the role of environmental covariates in its forecasting.

Methods

Data from household nutritional surveys in Somalia from 2007 to 2010 with a total of 1,066 clusters covering 73,778 children were included. We developed a Bayesian hierarchical space-time model to forecast stunting by using the relationship between observed stunting and environmental covariates in the preceding years. We then applied the model coefficients to environmental covariates in subsequent years. To determine the accuracy of the forecasting, we compared this model with a model that used data from all the years with the corresponding environmental covariates.

Results

Rainfall (OR = 0.994, 95 % Credible interval (CrI): 0.993, 0.995) and vegetation cover (OR = 0.719, 95 % CrI: 0.603, 0.858) were significant in forecasting stunting. The difference in estimates of stunting using the two approaches was less than 3 % in all the regions for all forecast years.

Conclusion

Stunting in Somalia is spatially and temporally heterogeneous. Rainfall and vegetation are major drivers of these variations. The use of environmental covariates for forecasting of stunting is a potentially useful and affordable tool for planning interventions to reduce the high burden of malnutrition in Somalia.

Keywords

  • Malnutrition
  • Stunting
  • Somalia
  • Forecasting

Background

Stunting, defined as linear growth failure is a result of chronic inadequate nutrition, infections or environmental-triggered intestinal inflammation [13]. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies a child as stunted if his or her length- or height-for-age z-score is below −2 [4, 5]. Stunting among children under the age of five years has long-term effects on cognitive development, school achievement, economic productivity in adulthood and maternal reproductive outcomes [6]. It is also recognized to have a major impact on childhood mortality, and is therefore a key concern for policy and programs addressing child survival [7].

Approximately, 39 % of children under the age of five years in the developing world are estimated to be stunted, the highest rates being in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa [8]. In particular, populations in countries with conflict suffer disruption in livelihoods, assets, nutrition and health. Consequently, conflict has enormous negative impact on food, economy, health and the environment [9]. In 2005–07 the proportion of malnourished people living in countries with a protracted crisis ranged from 14 % in Côte d’Ivoire to 69 % in the Democratic Republic of the Congo [10]. In Somalia, the national mean prevalence of stunting was estimated to be greater than 20 % [11], indicating a critical situation by WHO standards [12, 13].

A number of risk factors including infection, seasonal food insecurity and environmental conditions have been previously shown to be associated with stunting [1417]. Rural households have been reported to be predominantly affected because they heavily depend on traditional rain-fed agriculture and pasture for livestock. Rainfall and vegetation therefore play a major role in determining the economic and nutrition status of the rural communities [18, 19]. These environmental conditions are influenced largely by intra-seasonal and inter-annual climatic variability resulting in extreme events such as drought and floods that reduce agricultural outputs and pasture leading to severe food shortages. Therefore monitoring environmental conditions may help in forecasting the prevalence of malnutrition especially in sub-Saharan countries where livelihoods are closely intertwined with climate variability [20]. This will help in identifying hotspots of high prevalence using the patterns of environmental and climatic determinants to guide in predicting areas where timely interventions are likely be targeted.

Previous efforts in predicting malnutrition have focused on ecological and areal data analysis [21, 22]. These methods give mean estimates at regional or district level but do not capture the variability of prevalence that occurs within regions. In this study, we used Bayesian space-time geostatistical models to determine how well environmental covariates can be used to forecast the prevalence of stunting among children under the age of five years from 2008 to 2010 in Somalia. Continuous surfaces of environmental covariates together with observed rates of stunting from the sampled locations were used to predict the rates of stunting to unsampled locations and forecast prevalence on a continuous scale at 1 × 1 km spatial resolution. This method accounts for heterogeneity in prevalence influenced by factors such as precipitation and vegetation as well as proximal factors to give accurate estimates at a high spatial resolution [23].

Methods

Somalia country context

Somalia has a population of approximately 12 million people with an estimated 1.7 million children under the age of five years. Child mortality rate is estimated to be 180 per 1000 live births, which translates to approximately 71,000 deaths annually in children under the age of five years [24].

Pastoralism and agro-pastoralism are the two dominant livelihood systems in Somalia. Pastoralists are mainly rural and predominantly in the arid areas of northern and central Somalia, as well as along Ethiopian and Kenyan borders. Agro-pastoralists communities practice mixed agriculture in the marginal lands [25], and are found in the inter-riverine regions of Bay, Bakool, western Hiraan and eastern Gedo in Southern Somalia, and in small areas of the Northern regions [25]. A small proportion of the riverine population along the Juba and Shabelle rivers depends on settled agriculture. Fishing represents only a very small livelihood activity, despite Somalia having one of the longest coastlines in Africa [25]. The Somali population relies on long rains, the Gu in April to June and the shorter rains, Deyr in October to December for agricultural production, pasture regeneration and replenishment of rivers, dams and ground water supply. However, recurrent droughts and flooding in the country has affected the livelihoods, food security and nutritional status [25].

Due to inadequate governance structures in parts of Somalia because of the long civil war and consequent insecurity, nutrition planning and response is mainly undertaken by international organizations in a ‘Nutrition Cluster’ formed in 2006 [25]. So far, nutrition responses have primarily focused on intervening against the alarming rates of acute malnutrition throughout the country. Several feeding programmes for severe acute malnutrition are implemented across Somalia by UN agencies, international and local non-governmental organizations (NGOs). However the coverage and quality of interventions is limited by the overall weakness of the public health system and poor accessibility to several parts of the country [26].

Survey data

The data used for this study were obtained from the Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit (FSNAU) of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and are from surveys undertaken between 2007 and 2010. During this period, FSNAU, in partnership with United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), conducted bi-annual seasonal nutrition assessment surveys using standard methods, indicators and tools [2628]. Sample size was calculated for children aged 6–59 months using Epi Info/ENA 2008 software (Center for Disease Control (CDC) in USA), the sampling unit being the household [27, 28]. This methodology used estimated average household size and the proportion of children aged 6–59 months in the population obtained from previous surveys or national statistics. Detailed description of the survey methods are described elsewhere [27].

Spatial coordinates for each survey cluster were acquired through an online search and verified using Google Earth (Google, Seattle, USA) to confirm if the coordinates matched evidence of human settlement. Those settlements for which no reliable source of coordinates could be obtained were excluded from the analysis. These data were then aggregated at the cluster level with the corresponding geographical covariates and year of survey. Each record represented a cluster and consisted of total children examined, stunted children, a list of geographical covariates and the year and season of the survey. Table 1 provides a detailed summary of the data used in the study.
Table 1

A summary of the survey data used in this study by zone and region in Somalia. Children with height-for-age z-scores of < −2 were considered stunted according tothe WHO growth standards [4, 5]

Zone

Region

Number of clusters

Number of children examined

Number of children stunted

Percent stunted

North East (Puntland)

Bari

9

756

201

26.59

Mudug

61

6188

804

12.99

Nugaal

24

1673

383

22.89

North West (Somaliland)

Awdal

26

862

7

0.81

Sanaag

14

412

3

0.73

Sool

3

142

18

12.68

Togdheer

12

673

362

53.79

Woqooyi Galbeed

23

2465

1378

55.90

South Central

Bakool

75

3534

1150

32.54

Banadir

1

51

0

0.00

Bay

98

5568

2133

38.31

Galgaduud

77

5831

1908

32.72

Gedo

111

6985

1999

28.62

Hiraan

142

10743

2260

21.04

Juba Dhexe

77

5253

2734

52.05

Juba Hoose

71

5560

1553

27.93

Shabelle Dhexe

101

7650

2414

31.56

Shabelle Hoose

141

9432

3432

36.39

Total

 

1066

73778

22739

30.82

Statistical analysis

The first step of the analysis involved examining the effects and the patterns of five environmental covariates: precipitation, enhanced vegetation index (EVI), temperature, distance to main water sources and urbanization. These covariates were selected based on their association with vector-borne diseases and food security [29, 30]. The effects of the covariates were determined using a Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) through generalized linear approach [31]. Bayesian hierarchical space-time models were implemented using integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA) in R-INLA library [32] to predict on continuous maps the prevalence of stunting at 1 × 1 km spatial resolution using the data and selected covariates [33]. The prediction of the prevalence of stunting was done using two models. In the first model (model 1), the prevalence of stunting was forecast for a future year by using the environmental covariates for this year and the coefficients derived from a regression analysis of the relationship between stunting and the environmental covariates of the preceding years using a geostatistical model. For example, the forecasting for 2008 was made using the regression coefficients of 2007 survey data and environmental covariates applied to the 2008 environmental covariates, while 2010 forecast was based on the regression coefficients of the space-time geostatistical model that used the survey data and environmental covariates from 2007 to 2009 applied to the environmental covariates for 2010. In the second model (model2), the whole dataset and the environmental covariates from all the years were used to fit the model parameters and predict the prevalence of stunting from 2007 to 2010 using the space-time geostatistical model. This model was considered to be the gold-standard for our analysis as it used the whole data in simultaneous modelling of prevalence and the prediction of uncertainty and accounted fully for the complete spatial and temporal dependence to predict to each year from 2007 to 2010 [34]. These model results were used to validate the predictive power of model 1. The procedure was repeated for data among children aged 6–30 months to observe the variability of the rates of stunting in this age group using the two models.

The estimation stages of the two geostatistical models were implemented using Stochastic Partial Differential Equations (SPDE), which are formulated as a link between Gaussian random fields (GRFs) and the Gaussian Markov Random Fields (GMRFs) [32]. The spatiotemporal covariance function and the dense covariance matrix of the Gaussian field are replaced by a neighborhood structure and a sparse precision matrix respectively that together define a GMRF [35]. The posterior mean for each specified year of prediction was mapped at 1 × 1 km spatial resolution, which was then further classified into WHO categories of stunting among children less than 5 years of age [36]. The proportions of stunted children were computed for each region and year in Somalia. This was obtained by multiplying the posterior mean proportion of stunted children at each 1 × 1 km pixel with the corresponding population estimate [37] of children under the age of five years at the same location and year to compute the number of children stunted at each pixel. These numbers were summed for each region and then divided by the corresponding total population of under-fives for the region [37].

To assess the performance of the forecasting model, we compared the forecasted proportion of stunted children in the survey locations and the actual prevalence at these locations by randomly generating 10 % validation dataset using a sampling algorithm which declusters over space and time. Four performance indices were computed to evaluate the predictive performance and model fit for the two models: root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean prediction error (MPE), mean absolute prediction error (MAPE) and the correlation coefficient between the predicted and the observed values. We examined the correlation between the forecast and observed prevalence using correlation plots. Further, the marginal excursion probabilities for each prevalence class based on the estimated posterior distribution for stunting were simultaneously calculated using numerical integration (NI) method as implemented by Bolin and Lindgren 2012 [38]. Areas where the stochastic process exceeded prevalence of stunting of 40 % (extreme stunting according to the WHO) were then significantly determined using the positive excursion function in NI method and the parametric family of excursion sets [38]. The correlation between the full data and forecast models values from the two models were visualized using column plots at regional level for 2008 to 2010. Detailed methods on covariate selection, Bayesian hierarchical space-time modeling, validation procedures can be found in the Additional file 1.

Results

A total of 1,066 unique survey locations sampled during the period of 2007 to 2010 were included in the analysis (Additional file 1: Figure SI 1a & 1b). About 36 % of the data was collected in 2007, 28 % in 2008, 22 % in 2009 and 14 % in 2010. The location of 1,765 children from 34 clusters could not be accurately determined and were therefore excluded from the analysis. Out of the 73,778 children included in the analysis, 22,739 (31 %) were stunted [Table 1]. Precipitation (OR = 0.994, 95 % credible interval (CrI): 0.993, 0.995) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI) (OR = 0.719, 95 % CrI: 0.603, 0.858) were the only environmental covariates that were significantly associated with stunting and were used in the space-time geo-statistical models.

The posterior distributions of stunting for the forecast years from the two models were displayed using WHO categories on a 1 × 1 km spatial resolution grid are shown in Fig. 1a and b. The national prevalence of stunting was estimated at 30 % in 2008, 31 % in 2009 and 28 % in 2010. The prevalence is highest in South Central zone followed by North East (Puntland) and lowest in North West (Somaliland). Additional file 1: Figure SI 2 in the supplementary file shows the continuous maps at 1 × 1 km spatial resolution of standard deviations of the posterior mean stunting for the years 2007 to 2010.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a Model 1 (forecast model): The predicted 1 × 1 km posterior mean stunting maps classified using WHO categories for 2008 and 2010 for children aged 6–59 months. Less than 20 % represents low prevalence; 20 % – < 30 %, medium prevalence; 30 % – < 40 %; high class and > =40 % represents the very high prevalence. b Model 2 (full data model): The predicted 1 × 1 km posterior binned stunting mean maps for 2007 and 2010 for children aged 6–59 months. Less than 20 % represents low prevalence; 20 % – < 30 %, medium prevalence; 30 % – < 40 %; high class and > =40 % represents the very high prevalence according to the WHO prevalence classification. A = South Central zone, B = North East (Puntland) zone, C = North West (Somaliland) zone. The blue lines represent the two rivers in Somalia (Juba and Shabelle)

Maps of marginal excursion probabilities based on the estimated posterior distribution threshold exceeding 40 % prevalence of stunting are shown in Fig. 2. The regions that consistently exceeded 40 % prevalence were Bay, Gedo, Bakool, Mudug, Lower and Upper Juba. All these regions are in the South Central zone.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Estimated areas with exceedance probabilities of the 40 % prevalence of stunting for children aged 6–59 months using the excursion contour functions of model 1 [38]. The maps were developed from extracting the > =40 % class produced from the surfaces of the simultaneous marginal excursion probabilities. The dark green color shows areas that are equal to or significantly greater than 40 % prevalence of stunting. These areas are of the ‘very high’ prevalence category according to the WHO classification [4, 5]. A = South Central zone, B = North East (Puntland) zone, C = North West (Somaliland) zone. The blue lines represent the two rivers in Somalia (Juba and Shabelle)

Figure 3 shows the estimated proportions of children under five years of age who were stunted by region and year of survey from models 1 (forecast) and 2 (full data). The maximum difference in the estimated prevalence of stunting between the two models was less than 3 % in all the regions across all forecast years. The highest inconsistency in prevalence of stunting between the forecast and full data models was observed in 2008, followed by 2009 and was lowest in 2010. In South Central zone, the prevalence of stunting in children was consistently high in Bay (41 %), Middle (40 %) and Lower Juba (37 %) and Lower Shabelle (39 %) for the three years of study. In the North East and North West zones, prevalence of stunting was high in Bari (26 %) and Woqooyi Galbeed (26 %) regions respectively. Detailed correlation plots of observed and predicted values at cluster level by year can be found in Additional file 1: Figure SI 3a, 3b and 3c. In addition, maps of posterior means among children aged 6–30 months from the two models can be found in Additional file 1: Figure SI 4a and 4b.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Percent population of children aged 6–59 months who were stunted in the years 2007 to 2010 by region in Somalia estimated using models 1 (forecast) and 2 (full data)

The validation statistics for the forecast model (model 1) in 2008, 2009 and 2010 respectively were: RMSE = 0.146, 0.127, 0.104; MPE = 0.003, 0.006, 0.019; MAPE = 0.109, 0.091, 0.071 and the correlation coefficient between the observed and predicted were 0.619, 0.658, and 0.519 for 2008, 2009 and 2010 respectively. The validation statistics for the full space time model (model 2) were: RMSE = 0.136, MPE =0.002, MAPE = 0.105 and linear correlation coefficient of 0.668. Maps of the data distribution per year of study, posterior standard deviations from the mean and the correlation plot of the posterior predicted mean and observed values of the dataset can be found in the Additional file 1.

Discussion

The aim of this study was to forecast the levels and patterns of childhood stunting in Somalia at a high spatial resolution using available survey data and standard environmental covariates. To achieve this, we modeled the changing patterns of prevalence of stunting from 2007 to 2010 using the largest available dataset of malnutrition among children under the age of five years in Somalia. The two main environmental covariates used in this study were rainfall and vegetation cover. The first model forecast the prevalence of stunting by using the regression results of observed stunting and the environmental covariates at the survey locations for a given year and then applying these regression coefficients to the environmental covariates in a subsequent year using a geostatistical model. The second model used the whole dataset and the environmental covariates from all the years to fit the model parameters and predict the prevalence of stunting in each year. The difference in the estimated prevalence of stunting in the two models was less than 3 % across all the regions and survey years in Somalia. Overall, the distribution of stunting in Somalia suggests substantial spatial heterogeneity with prevalence consistently higher in the regions of the South Central zones compared to those in the North.

Our study has shown that data on environmental changes related to the variability of rainfall and vegetation cover provide unique opportunities to predict future rates of stunting and can help identify populations that are likely to be most affected to guide interventions. Previous literature shows that spatial patterns of food insecurity in sub-Saharan Africa are correlated with the rainfall anomalies and vegetation cover [39]. Droughts that have been experienced in the Horn of Africa have directly resulted in food crises in 1984–1985, 2000–2001 and 2002–2003 and caused widespread famine in 25 African countries [39]. For example, the drought in Ethiopia in 2003 affected approximately 13 million people [40]. In 2011, some parts of southern Somalia were affected by famine in which approximately 4 million people, nearly half the country’s population, faced a humanitarian crisis [41]. In West African countries, the intensity of poverty was shown to be inversely associated with the vegetation cover [42].

A potential reason for high levels of stunting in Somalia is the failure of seasonal rains for a long time which have caused a severe water crisis in most parts of the country with the exception of the North West zone [43]. Agro-pastoral and riverine livelihoods found in South Central zone mainly depend on rainfall and have repeatedly been subjected to dry conditions since 2007 which resulted in a significant crop harvest failure [43]. This led to dramatic increases in the price of water and local cereals, which were the main drivers of a deteriorating food security situation in Somalia [43]. The pastoralist communities, predominantly found in the northern region, have also been severely affected by the water crisis caused largely by the failed rains. As a coping mechanism, the pastoral communities migrate seasonally in search for water and pasture thereby reducing the effects of droughts, however, the most threatened are those with cattle and sheep because these herds have limited ability to migrate for long distances [12, 44, 45].

The sustained conflict in Somalia has led to lack of reliable ‘safety nets’ and appropriate financial support mechanism. This has necessitated the distribution of humanitarian aid, including food supplies, to strengthen households coping mechanisms [18]. It is unclear, however, if these interventions have achieved the right impact and whether mitigation of the effects of immediate shocks have led to strengthening household capacity for self-sustenance after the shock. Persistent conflict has also hindered access to credible information on the burden of malnutrition that can be used to establish public health priorities and develop timely interventions in the country. Our study shows that with improved understanding of climate variability, the implications of weather patterns for the food security and vulnerability of rural communities can be more predictable and be monitored effectively.

Our analysis has some limitations. First, the use of the WHO reference population for measuring stunting among Somali children may be problematic. Often, Somali babies have lower weight at birth, which may be thinness more than shortness [46]. In addition, the average Somali child is thinner and taller, by 12–24 months, with half the stunting prevalence (defined by height-for age) when compared to other children in the neighboring East African countries [46]. It is also noted that children’s growth patterns in pastoralist communities differ considerably from those of children in populations with agricultural livelihoods where pastoral communities demonstrate decreasing weight-for-height with increasing age which leads to tall but light in body-weight in adulthood [47]. The WHO standards may therefore underestimate stunting in most of Somalia. There is also uncertainty in determining child age among rural populations where there are limited access to antenatal services and therefore low possession of health or immunization cards [48, 49]. In our study, the age of the child was provided mainly by their mothers often without any means of verifying the data. The sustained conflict would have exacerbated malnutrition in Somalia and continues to be the primary reason for population displacement in the South Central zone. However, in this study, reliable conflict data was not available at the time of analysis and was not accounted in the modeling process. Although the performance of the forecast and full data models varied slightly, our models identified extreme values as outliers, which were therefore normalized. However, the models also suggest the presence of hotspots of stunting that vary between years and these may be partly linked to variations in the sampling of survey locations during each cross-sectional survey.

Conclusion

The rate of stunting in Somalia is spatially and temporally heterogeneous and rainfall and vegetation are major drivers of these variations. The use of environmental covariates as alternative to surveys or complementary to sparse data can help forecast stunting and inform programme preparedness. Nutrition responses in Somalia are primarily focused on responding to the alarming rates of acute malnutrition. It has been estimated that if a package of nutrition-specific intervention that includes management of acute malnutrition and supplementation of multiple micronutrients is scaled up to 90 % coverage, stunting would be reduced by 20 % and this would reduce under-five mortality by 15 % [17, 50]. Our findings, especially using the maps that use the environmental data, may help programmes to target these interventions at high spatial resolution to improve efficiency.

Abbreviations

CDC, center for disease control and prevention; EVI, enhanced vegetation index; FAO, food and agriculture organization; FSNAU, food security and nutrition analysis unit; GMRFs, gaussian markov random fields; GRFs, Gaussian random fields; INLA, integrated nested laplace approximations; MAPE, mean absolute prediction error; MPE, mean prediction error; NGOs, non-governmental organizations; NI, numerical integration; RMSE, root-mean-square error; SPDE, stochastic partial differential equations; UNICEF, United Nations Children’s Fund; WHO, World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the FSNAU for providing data for this study. We are grateful to Harvard Rue, Elias Krainski and Geir-Arne Fuglstad of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway for their help with the development of the models.

Funding

AMN is supported by a Wellcome Trust grant (#095127) that also supports DKK. JAB is supported by a Wellcome Trust grant (#083579). Both JAB and AMN are also supported by the Wellcome Trust through a Sustaining Health award (#103926). We are grateful for the support provided by the Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme grant to the KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme.

Availability of data and materials

The data used in this study is available to the public in the Integrated Database System (IDS) online repository of FSNAU: http://www.fsnau.org/ids/. No additional data are available for sharing.

Authors’ contribution

DKK, JAB, N-BK and AMN were responsible for the concept and design of the study. DKK led the development of the models, data assembly, analyses and interpretation of results. AMN, JAB and N-BK checked the statistical analysis, contributed to the methodology and assisted with the interpretation of the results. GMM and EOO were responsible for conducting the surveys, cleaning and archiving the data. AMN was responsible for overall scientific oversight for this work. All authors contributed to critical revisions for important intellectual content and contributed to the final submission. The paper is published with the permission of the Director, KEMRI. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ministry of Health Somalia, Transitional Federal Government of Somalia Republic, Ref: MOH/WC/XA/146./07, dated 02/02/07. Verbal consent was obtained from all the guardians for the children participating in the survey. Information regarding the purpose and objectives of the surveys, nature of the data collection procedures, targeted subgroups in the community was explained to the local authorities and all the guardians of the children before collecting the data.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
INFORM Project, Spatial Health Metrics Group, Kenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
(2)
Kenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (coast), Kilifi, Kenya
(3)
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, CCVTM, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK
(4)
Nutrition Section, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Kenya Country Office, UN Complex Gigiri, Nairobi, Kenya
(5)
Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit (FSNAU) - Somalia, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Ngecha Road Campus, Nairobi, Kenya
(6)
Warwick Medical School, Health Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Warwick Evidence, Gibbet Hill, CV4 7AL Coventry, UK
(7)
Department of Mathematics and Information sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK
(8)
Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), 1A-B, rue Thomas Edison, L-1445 Strassen, Luxembourg

References

  1. WHO. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1–452.Google Scholar
  2. Prendergast AJ, Rukobo S, Chasekwa B, Mutasa K, Ntozini R, Mbuya MN, Jones A, Moulton LH, Stoltzfus RJ, Humphrey JH. Stunting is characterized by chronic inflammation in Zimbabwean infants. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e86928.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Richard SA, Black RE, Gilman RH, Guerrant RL, Kang G, Lanata CF, Molbak K, Rasmussen ZA, Sack RB, Valentiner-Branth P, et al. Diarrhea in early childhood: short-term association with weight and long-term association with length. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(7):1129–38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. De Onis M. Assessment of differences in linear growth among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95(S450):56–65.Google Scholar
  5. De Onis M, Branca F. Childhood stunting: a global perspective. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12(S1):12–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewey KG, Begum K. Long-term consequences of stunting in early life. Matern Child Nutr. 2011;7(s3):5–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pelletier DL, Frongillo Jr EA, Schroeder DG, Habicht JP. The effects of malnutrition on child mortality in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(4):443–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. United Nations Children’s Fund NY. The progress of nations, 2000: ERIC Clearinghouse. 2000.Google Scholar
  9. Messer E, Cohen M, Marchione T. CONFLICT: A cause and effect of hunger. Spec Rep. 2001:1. Available online at www.ennonline.net/fex/12/conflict.
  10. Spikes TP, Volatility EFP. 2011 Global Hunger Index.Google Scholar
  11. De Onis M, Blossner M, Borghi E. Prevalence and trends of stunting among pre-school children, 1990–2020. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(1):142–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO-FSNAU-Somalia. Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Post Deyr 2010/11. 2011.Google Scholar
  13. WHO, UNICEF. WHO Child Growth Standards and the Identification of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and Children. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund; 2009.Google Scholar
  14. Engebretsen IMS, Tylleskar T, Wamani H, Karamagi C, Tumwine JK. Determinants of infant growth in Eastern Uganda: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):418.Google Scholar
  15. Rice AL, Sacco L, Hyder A, Black RE, et al. Malnutrition as an underlying cause of childhood deaths associated with infectious diseases in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(10):1207–1221.Google Scholar
  16. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, De Onis M, Ezzati M, Mathers C, Rivera J. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet. 2008;371(9608):243–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bhutta Z, Ahmed T, Black R, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E, Haider B, Kirkwood B, Morris S, Sachdev H, et al. What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet. 2008;371(9610):417–440.Google Scholar
  18. Haile M. Weather patterns, food security and humanitarian response in sub-Saharan Africa. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360(1463):2169–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kinyoki DK, Berkley JA, Moloney GM, Odundo EO, Kandala N-B, Noor AM. Predictors of the risk of malnutrition among children under the age of five years in Somalia. Public Health Nutr. 2015;2014(0011):4–5.Google Scholar
  20. Sheffield J, Wood EF, Chaney N, Guan K, Sadri S, Yuan X, Olang L, Amani A, Ali A, Demuth S, et al. A drought monitoring and forecasting system for sub-Sahara African water resources and food security. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2014;95(6):861–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kandala N-B, Madungu TP, Emina JB, Nzita KP, Cappuccio FP. Malnutrition among children under the age of five in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): does geographic location matter? BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):261.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Simler KR. Nutrition mapping in Tanzania: an exploratory analysis. IFPRI Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper. 2006(204). Available online at http://cdm15738.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/36530/filename/36529.pdf.
  23. Diggle PJ, Tawn J, Moyeed R. Model-based geostatistics. J R Stat Soc. 1998;47(3):299-350.Google Scholar
  24. WHO. World health statistics 2012: World Health Organization. 2012.Google Scholar
  25. WFP-Somalia. Somalia: Trend Analysis of Food and Nutrition Insecurity (2007–2012). 2012.Google Scholar
  26. WHO, UNICEF, WFP, FAO/FSNAU-Somalia. Somalia Nutrition Strategy 2011–2013. 2010.Google Scholar
  27. FAO/FSNAU-Somalia. Guidelines for Emergency Nutrition & Mortality Surveys in Somalia. 2011.Google Scholar
  28. Smith E. Nutritional Surveillance Systems in Somalia. 2006.Google Scholar
  29. Balk D, Storeygard A, Levy M, Gaskell J, Sharma M, Flor R. Child hunger in the developing world: An analysis of environmental and social correlates. Food Policy. 2005;30(5):584–611.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Grace K, Davenport F, Funk C, Lerner AM. Child malnutrition and climate in Sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of recent trends in Kenya. Appl Geogr. 2012;35(1):405–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. McLeod A, Xu C. bestglm: Best Subset GLM. URL https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bestglm/bestglm.pdf. 2010.
  32. Blangiardo M, Cameletti M: Spatio-temporal models. In: Spatial and Spatio-temporal Bayesian Models with R-INLA. edn. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2015;1:235–58.Google Scholar
  33. Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N. Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2009;71(2):319–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Diggle P, Moyeed R, Rowlingson B, Thomson M. Childhood malaria in the Gambia: a case-study in model-based geostatistics. JR Stat Soc. 2002;51(4):493–506.Google Scholar
  35. Cameletti M, Lindgren F, Simpson D, Rue Hav. Spatio-temporal modeling of particulate matter concentration through the SPDE approach. AStA Adv Stat Anal. 2013;97(2):109–31.Google Scholar
  36. De Onis M, Blossner M. The World Health Organization global database on child growth and malnutrition: methodology and applications. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(4):518–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Linard C, Gilbert M, Snow RW, Noor AM, Tatem AJ. Population distribution, settlement patterns and accessibility across Africa in 2010. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31743.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Bolin D, Lindgren F. Excursion and contour uncertainty regions for latent Gaussian models. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2015;77(1):85–106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Tadesse T, Haile M, Senay G, Wardlow BD, Knutson CL. The need for integration of drought monitoring tools for proactive food security management in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat Resour Forum. 2008;2008:265–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Disaster_Prevention_and_Preparedness_Commission. National information on disaster reduction report. Kobe-Hyogo, Japan: Proceedings of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction; 2005. Available online at http://www.unisdr.org/2005/mdgs-drr/national-reports/Ethiopia-report.pdf. (Accessed 05 Oct 2015).
  41. Ferris E, Petz D. The year that shook the rich: A review of natural disasters in 2011: Brookings Institution-London School of Economics Project on Internal Displacement. 2012.Google Scholar
  42. Sedda L, Tatem AJ, Morley DW, Atkinson PM, Wardrop NA, Pezzulo C, Sorichetta A, Kuleszo J, Rogers DJ. Poverty, health and satellite-derived vegetation indices: their inter-spatial relationship in West Africa. Int Health. 2015;7(2):99–106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. FAO-FSNAU-Somalia. FSNAU Nutrition Update, May-June 2011. 2011.Google Scholar
  44. Gomes N. Access to water, pastoral resource management and pastoralists’ livelihoods: Lessons learned from water development in selected areas of Eastern Africa (Kenya, Ethiopia, Somalia). FAO LSP WP. 2006;26. Available online at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/ah247e/ah247e00.pdf.
  45. Kassahun A, Snyman H, Smit G. Impact of rangeland degradation on the pastoral production systems, livelihoods and perceptions of the Somali pastoralists in Eastern Ethiopia. J Arid Environ. 2008;72(7):1265–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. UNICEF-ESARO. Assessment of Child Nutrition in the Greater Horn of Africa : Recent Trends and Future Developments. 2007.Google Scholar
  47. Chotard S, Mason JB, Oliphant NP, Mebrahtu S, Hailey P. Fluctuations in wasting in vulnerable child populations in the Greater Horn of Africa. Food Nutr Bull. 2010;31(Supplement 3):219S–33S.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Gorstein J. Assessment of nutritional status: effects of different methods to determine age on the classification of undernutrition. Bull World Health Organ. 1989;67(2):143–50.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. De Onis M, WMGRSG. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr. 2006;450:76–85.Google Scholar
  50. Prendergast AJ, Humphrey JH. The stunting syndrome in developing countries. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2014;34(4):250–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement