Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Disordered eating behavior, health and motives to exercise in young men: cross-sectional population-based MOPO study

  • 1, 2, 3Email author,
  • 1, 3, 4,
  • 5, 6, 7,
  • 3, 8,
  • 3, 9,
  • 1, 2, 3, 9,
  • 2 and
  • 1, 2, 3
BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:483

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3162-2

©  Nurkkala et al. 2016

  • Received: 28 November 2015
  • Accepted: 25 May 2016
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Being overweight is an increasing problem among young people, among whom disordered eating behavior is linked with weight problems as well as unhealthy weight control. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether health factors and motives to exercise differ in young men by the type of disordered eating behavior.

Methods

The population-based, cross-sectional MOPO study consisted of 2,096 young Finnish men (mean age 17.9, SD 0.7) attending compulsory call-ups for military service in the Oulu area in 2010, 2011, and 2013. They responded to a questionnaire that included two subscales of the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 indicating drive for thinness and bulimic behavior and questions on health, physical activity, and motives to exercise. The association between disordered eating behavior and related factors was analyzed by binary logistic regression.

Results

Altogether, 6.9 % (n = 145) of the men had symptoms of disordered eating, i.e., 5.4 % had a drive for thinness (n = 114) and 3.7 % had bulimic behavior (n = 77). Drive for thinness was associated with a perception of being overweight (OR 3.7; 95 % CI 2.2–6.1), poor self-rated health (2.3; 1.2–4.4), more leisure sitting time (1.1; 1.0–1.2), and body-related exercise motives (body acceptance: 3.0; 1.7–5.2; weight loss: 2.5; 1.4–4.4). Bulimic behavior was positively associated with poor self-rated health (2.6; 1.1–5.8) and several motives to exercise, i.e., due to another person’s suggestion (2.8; 1.6–4.8), competitive sports (2.1; 1.2–3.7), body acceptance (2.1; 1.1–3.9), and weight loss (1.9; 1.1–3.3), but inversely associated with health/fitness-related exercise motives (health promotion: 0.3; 0.1–0.5; muscular strength or physical performance: 0.5; 0.2–0.9).

Conclusions

In young men, disordered eating behavior was associated with being overweight, having poor self-rated health, and having a greater amount of leisure sitting time as well as non-health-related motives to exercise. In order to recognize those at risk for disordered eating behavior, evaluating these factors could be beneficial.

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Male
  • Disordered eating behavior
  • Physical activity
  • Motivation
  • Obesity

Background

Eating disorders are usually classified into the categories of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and atypical eating disorders (eating disorders not otherwise specified), such as binge eating disorder. These disorders are much more common in women than in men. In Finland, less than 5 % of the patients treated in a specialized eating disorder clinic in 1995–2010 were men [1]. When abnormal eating behavior does not fulfill the criteria of an eating disorder, the term disordered eating behavior (DEB) is used.

DEB is associated with many co-problems, such as obesity [2], but also with several mental health problems, such as depressive symptoms [3–5], social phobia [6], and panic and anxiety disorders [5–7]. Furthermore, DEB tends to track from adolescence to adulthood and to later turn into an eating disorder [8, 9]. Thus, DEB, together with its comorbidities, can cause considerable adverse effects on an individual’s health and wellbeing as well as on society’s health care costs.

DEB is common among young people and adults; however, it is not as well-detected in men as it is in women [10, 11]. In previous studies, the prevalence of DEB among young men has varied, depending on the assessment method, from 6.5 % to 14 % [4, 5, 12], which is less than among young women (more than one quarter [5, 12]). However, many DEB questionnaires are based on female symptomatology, which may limit their ability to recognize male symptoms and result in reported lower prevalence among men. In men, DEB can appear as binge eating, restrictive eating due to negative emotions, or extreme and unhealthy weight control behaviors, e.g., skipping meals and use of food substitutes [12, 13]. It has also been positively associated with drive for muscularity, excessive exercise, and exercising to lose or gain weight and inversely associated with exercising for fun [10, 14]. Among male adolescents, compulsive exercise can result not only from a desire to be more muscular, especially from the waist up [15], but also from bulimic behavior or excessive exercise for losing weight for better health [10, 14]. However, DEB has not been related to the amount of physical activity in previous studies [14, 16, 17].

DEB has been associated with both measured and perceived overweight status [5, 12]. Compensatory dieting and extreme weight loss behaviors—which have been reported to increase in men from adolescence to young adulthood [18]—can be associated with future body mass increase in young men [19]. Moreover, dieting among young men may be more common if their body images are concurrently distorted [18] or if weight concerns were present earlier in adolescence [20].

In the young US male population, the prevalence of body image distortions—with or without binge eating or compensatory behavior—was as high as 33 % [9]. Their related traits are muscle and body dissatisfaction, which can also lead to a greater risk for DEB and depressive symptoms [21]. Up to 30 % of young Finnish men have been shown to be dissatisfied with their muscularity [22], which is more common in men than in women [23]. Body dissatisfaction has been found to be more prevalent among male adolescents who are under- or overweight than among those with normal weights [24].

Population-based studies on the role of physical activity and fitness in DEB and its different traits of drive for thinness and bulimic behavior among young men are lacking. However, such studies are needed for early identification of young men with disordered eating. The present study aims to investigate the prevalence of DEB and its relationships with health, physical activity, and motives to exercise. We hypothesized that DEB is positively associated with a high frequency of exercise, weight- and appearance-related exercise motives, and perception of being under- or overweight.

Methods

Study design and setting

The target population of the MOPO study consisted of all conscription-aged young men during 2009–2013 (n = 5,864) in the city of Oulu in Northern Finland, which has approximately 193,000 inhabitants. Data collection took place at the mandatory call-ups for military service arranged annually by the Finnish Defense Forces. Exclusion criteria to participate in the call-ups for military service included having a severe physical or mental illness that did not allow for independent living. The study included a medical examination before the call-ups and questionnaires and physiological measurements conducted during the call-up day. The aim of the study was to provide knowledge on measured physical activity and young men’s attitudes towards it, as well as health, fitness, nutrition, health information-seeking behavior, and other life habits and cultures among young men.

In this study, data collected during 2010, 2011, and 2013 that included information on disordered eating behavior. In total, 3,542 young men participated, of which 65.6 % (n = 2,322) took part in the physiological measurements and 70.3 % (n = 2,490) completed the questionnaire. Thus, the present study consisted of all those 2,096 (59.2 %) men (mean age of 17.9, SD 0.7 years) who responded to the questions on disordered eating behavior.

The procedures of the study were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District approved the study design (ETTM123/2009), and written informed consent was obtained after a complete description of the study was given to the participants. Participation in the study did not affect the participants’ military service or their future health care.

Study questionnaire

The study questionnaire included items on age, socio-economic status, disordered eating behavior, weight, health, physical activity, sedentary behavior, fitness, and motives to exercise.

Disordered eating behavior

The participants were asked to respond to the two subscales of the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 questionnaire (EDI-3) as an indicator for DEB. One subscale described drive for thinness (DT), and the other described bulimic behavior (BB) [25]. Each subscale consisted of seven questions with a 6-point Likert scale from never to always, but the response alternatives never and rarely were combined for the analyses. Thus, the scale was scored as 0 = never or rarely; 1 = sometimes; 2 = often; 3 = usually; and 4 = always [25, 26]. The first question has an inverse scoring. The questionnaire has been validated for Danish women [26]. Cronbach’s alphas as a measure for internal consistencies were 0.74 for DT and 0.85 for BB.

Weight

Perceived weight was determined from the responses to the following question: “What do you think about your weight?” A 5-point Likert scale was used for the response (1 = very underweight through 5 = very overweight). The response alternatives very underweight and somewhat underweight were combined, as was also done for very overweight and somewhat overweight. Weight history was investigated with the following questions: “Have you been overweight at some point of your life?” (1 = yes, slightly overweight; 2 = yes, severely overweight; 3 = no; and 4 = do not know, which was interpreted as never having been overweight for the analyses) and “Have you sometimes lost several kilos of weight?” (1 = no; 2 = yes, weight loss was planned and controlled; 3 = yes, weight loss turned uncontrolled).

Health

Self-rated health was investigated with the following question: “How is the state of your health?” (1 = good through 5 = poor). The response alternatives good and quite good were combined, as was also done for poor and quite poor.

Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and fitness

Daily physical activity was assessed with the following question: “How much do you approximately move during the day (e.g., while working, biking or walking to school or work, during the breaks at school, in household chores, or in hobbies and leisure time)?” (1 = <1 h; 2 = 1–2 h; 3 = >2 h). Sedentary behavior was identified as daily sitting hours during leisure time with the following question: “How much do you sit per day outside school or work (e.g., watching TV, reading, using the computer, and driving a car)?” Self-rated physical fitness was assessed with the following question: “How fit do you think you are compared to your peers?” The response options used a 5-point scale (1 = distinctly poorer through 5 = significantly better). The response alternatives distinctly poorer and somewhat poorer were combined, as was also done for significantly better and somewhat better.

Motives to exercise

The motives to exercise were investigated by a modified version of Nigg’s question [27]: “Are the following issues important for your exercising?” The response choices given were the binary options yes or no. The motives to exercise were classified according to Markland and Ingledew [28] and Ingledew and Markland [29] into four categories:
  1. a)

    body (body acceptance, enhancing appearance, increasing sex appeal, weight loss);

     
  2. b)

    health/fitness (enhancing muscle mass, improving or maintaining muscular strength and/or physical performance, promoting health, reducing stress);

     
  3. c)

    social engagement (competing and succeeding in athletics or sports, suggestion of a friend or family member, helping relationships, improving one’s respect from peers); and

     
  4. d)

    enjoyment (enjoying the feelings of euphoria gained by exercise, enjoying heavy exertion, increasing energy, improving spirits).

     

Measurements

The physiological measurements included anthropometry (height, body weight, body mass index, body composition), maximal isometric hand grip strength (as a measure of upper body strength) and aerobic fitness assessments.

Height was measured with a wall-mounted measuring tape and was recorded at a 0.5-cm precision. Body composition (weight with 0.1 kg accuracy, body mass index (BMI), fat free mass in kilograms at 0.1 kg accuracy, percentage body fat) was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody 720 device, Biospace Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) with the participant standing without shoes and socks and wearing lightweight indoor clothes. BMI was classified according to the World Health Organization guidelines: underweight (<18.5), normal (18.5–24.9), and overweight (≥25) [30]. The percentage of fat free mass was calculated by dividing fat free mass by weight.

Grip strength (kg) was measured using a dynamometer (Saehan, SAEHAN Corporation, Korea). During the examination, the participant stood with his legs apart and his elbow at a 90° angle and was instructed to grip the instrument with maximum strength. The measurement was repeated, and the higher result was selected. The mean of both hands was used in the analyses.

Aerobic fitness was assessed by the Polar Fitness Test™ (Polar Electro, Finland), which estimates maximal oxygen uptake (mL/min/kg) based on resting heart rate, heart rate variability, gender, age, height, body weight, and self-assessed physical activity [31].

Statistical analysis

The cut-off scores for DEB were based on the 95th percentile in the Drive for Thinness [32]. This cut-off has also been previously used for the EDI-2 subscales in a sample of adolescents [33]. Thus, a score of ≥11 was classified as having DT. In the Bulimia subscale, the 95th percentile was at 7 points, but because 7 points could be earned by answering sometimes to each question, those having ≥8 points were classified as having BB.

The group differences between those with and without DEB (DT and/or BB) were compared with the independent samples t-test or with the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. The Chi-square test was used for categorical variables. The level of significance was retained at the p-value <0.05. All variables significantly associated with DEB in the univariate analysis were entered in the binary forward stepwise logistic regression. The results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals. The Nagelkerke R-square was used for explaining the variance of risk of having a DEB trait. Statistical analyses were performed using PASW Statistics 18 for Windows.

Results

The characteristics of the total study population (n = 2,096) and those with and without DEB are described in Table 1. Eighty-six percent (n = 1,800) of the participants were students, 3 % (n = 61) were workers, 8 % (n = 159) were both, and 3 % (n = 61) were unemployed. The data on physiological measurements were available from a total of 1,614 participants.
Table 1

Characteristics of the young men with drive for thinness (DT) or bulimic behavior (BB) compared to the men without disordered eating behavior (DEB)

Characteristics

All (n = 2,096)

DT (n = 114)

BB (n = 77)

No DEB (n = 1,951)

Age, years

17.9 (0.7)

18.1 (1.0)

18.0 (0.8)

17.9 (0.6)

Height, cm

177.9 (6.4)

178.3 (5.4)

178.3 (5.1)

177.9 (6.4)

Weight, kg

72.5 (13.5)

82.9 (15.8)***

74.4 (16.9)

72.0 (13.1)

Body Mass Index, kg/m2

22.9 (4.0)

26.1 (4.9)***

23.4 (4.9)

22.7 (3.8)

 Underweight, n (%)

129 (8)

1 (1)*

3 (6)

126 (8)

 Overweight, n (%)

373 (23)

44 (57)***

12 (23)

326 (22)

Body fat percentage (%), median (95 % CI)

14.2 (13.8; 14.7)

22.4 (19.1; 26.3)***

13.7 (12.3; 15.8)

14.1 (13.7; 14.5)

Fat free mass (%), median (95 % CI)

48.3 (48.1; 48.5)

43.8 (41.8; 45.5)***

48.6 (47.8; 49.5)

48.4 (48.2; 48.6)

Aerobic fitness, mL/min/kg

53.6 (7.4)

50.5 (8.5)***

54.3 (8.3)

53.7 (7.2)

Grip strength, kg

46.6 (8.1)

47.9 (9.0)

48.6 (7.7)

46.5 (8.1)

Sitting hours (leisure time)

3.9 (2.2)

4.7 (2.5)**

4.3 (2.5)

3.9 (2.2)

Self-rated fitness poorer than among peers, n (%)

502 (24)

54 (48)***

24 (31)

439 (23)

Daily physical activity

 <1 hour, n (%)

487 (24)

30 (27)

16 (21)

449 (24)

 1–2 hours, n (%)

1038 (51)

55 (50)

38 (49)

970 (51)

 >2 hours, n (%)

522 (26)

25 (23)

23 (30)

487 (26)

Poor self-rated health, n (%)

107 (5)

18 (16)***

10 (14)**

87 (5)

Perceived weight

 Underweight, n (%)

349 (17)

11 (10)*

11 (15)

333 (17)

 Ideal weight, n (%)

1288 (62)

32 (29)***

44 (59)

1235 (64)

 Overweight, n (%)

425 (21)

67 (61)***

20 (27)

353 (18)

History of being overweight, n (%)

657 (32)

70 (65)***

33 (44)*

577 (30)

History of weight loss, n (%)

448 (22)

51 (47)***

25 (33)**

389 (20)

Note: One participant can have one or both DEB. Numbers do not match due to missing values

SD Standard Deviation, CI Confidence Intervals

*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001, reference group: no DEB

Values are means (SD) unless otherwise stated

Those who did not complete (n = 1,446) the study questionnaire did not differ from the study participants regarding perceived weight, self-rated health, sedentary behavior, and anthropometric measures. However, they were less frequently students (76 % vs. 86 %, p < 0.001), and they rated their fitness less frequently as good compared to their peers (29 % vs. 38 %) (p = 0.001).

Altogether, 145 (6.9 %) young men had either a drive for thinness (114/5.4 %) or bulimic behavior (77/3.7 %). Forty-six (2.2 %) had both DT and BB. Young men with DT more frequently had poor self-rated health and poorer physical fitness (both self-rated and measured), were on average 10.9 kg (95 % CI 7.2; 14.5) heavier, had higher body fat percentages (medians 22.4, 95 % CI 19.1; 26.3 vs. 14.1, 95 % CI 13.7; 14.5) and lower fat free mass (medians 43.8, 95 % CI 41.8; 45.5 vs. 48.4, 95 % CI 48.2; 48.6), and had a history of being overweight and/or losing weight more frequently than those without DEB (Table 1). The most significant differences in the motives to exercise by DT status were related to motives due to weight loss, body acceptance, and suggestions from friends or family members (Table 2). The young men with BB more often had poor self-rated health and a history of being overweight and/or losing weight than those without DEB (Table 1). They differed from young men without DEB in motives to exercise, for example, due to suggestion from others, respect from peers, weight loss, and body acceptance (Table 2).
Table 2

Motives to exercise in the young men with drive for thinness (DT) or with bulimic behavior (BB) compared to the men without disordered eating behavior (DEB)

 

All (n = 2,096)

DT (n = 114)

BB (n = 77)

No DEB (n = 1,951)

 

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Health/fitness-related

 Promoting health

1753 (86)

97 (87)

56 (74)**

1635 (86)

 Improving or maintaining muscular strength and/or physical performance

1642 (81)

82 (75)

52 (68)**

1539 (81)

 Enhancing muscle mass

1470 (72)

74 (67)

56 (74)

1373 (72)

 Reducing stress

1140 (56)

74 (67)*

46 (61)

1046 (55)

Enjoyment-related

 Enjoying the feelings of euphoria gained by exercise

1542 (76)

87 (80)

58 (77)

1430 (76)

 Increasing energy

1473 (73)

89 (81)*

55 (74)

1361 (72)

 Improving spirits

1469 (72)

83 (76)

54 (72)

1364 (72)

 Enjoying heavy exertion

1093 (54)

69 (63)*

42 (57)

1007 (54)

Body-related

 Enhancing appearance

1281 (63)

86 (78)**

44 (58)

1178 (63)

 Body acceptance

1147 (57)

91 (82)***

55 (73)**

1033 (55)

 Increasing sex appeal

1021 (51)

72 (64)**

42 (55)

929 (50)

 Weight loss

731 (36)

84 (76)***

39 (51)**

634 (34)

Social engagement-related

 Helping relationships

1090 (54)

62 (58)

44 (60)

1010 (54)

 Improving respect from peers

754 (37)

55 (51)**

39 (52)**

681 (36)

 Competing and succeeding in athletics or sports

694 (34)

33 (30)

36 (47)*

645 (34)

 Suggestion of a friend or family member

391 (19)

39 (36)***

31 (42)***

339 (18)

Note: One participant can have one or both DEB. Numbers do not match due to missing values

*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001, reference group: no DEB

Factors associated with drive for thinness

According to the multivariable logistic regression analysis, self-perception of being overweight, poor self-rated health, leisure time sitting hours, and having body acceptance and weight loss as motives to exercise were positively and significantly associated with the risk of having DT in young men (Table 3). The model including all these factors explained 21 % of the risk of having DT.
Table 3

Factors associated with drive for thinness (DT) in young men (n = 1,801) according to the multivariate logistic regression analysis

Variable

Adjusted OR (95 % CI)

P

Model R2 = 0.208a

Leisure time sitting hours, per 1 hour increment

1.10 (1.00–1.20)

0.046

Perception of being overweight (vs. underweight or ideal weight)

3.65 (2.20–6.06)

<0.001

Poor self-rated health (vs. good or average)

2.32 (1.22–4.41)

0.010

Motives to exercise

 weight loss

2.45 (1.37–4.36)

0.002

 body acceptance

2.98 (1.70–5.23)

<0.001

Note: Variables significant (p <0.05) in univariate analysis and DT were adjusted for in the forward stepwise logistic regression analysis

OR Odds Ratio, CI Confidence Interval

aR2 = Nagelkerke

Reference group: those without DEB

Factors associated with bulimic behavior

According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, poor self-rated health and motives to exercise due to suggestions from others, competition, weight loss, and body acceptance were positively and significantly associated with the risk of having BB in young men (Table 4), whereas having health promotion or improvement/maintenance of muscular strength/physical performance as the motives to exercise were negatively and significantly associated with the risk of having BB. The model including all these factors explained 13 % of the risk of having BB.
Table 4

Factors associated with bulimic behavior (BB) in young men (n = 1,865) according to the multivariate logistic regression analysis

Variable

Adjusted OR (95 % CI)

P

Model R2 = 0.131a

Poor self-rated health (vs. good or average)

2.56 (1.14–5.75)

0.023

Motives to exercise

 competing and succeeding in athletics or sports

2.13 (1.22–3.72)

0.008

 improving or maintaining muscular strength and/or physical performance

0.45 (0.23–0.87)

0.017

 weight loss

1.91 (1.09–3.34)

0.023

 promoting health

0.25 (0.13–0.50)

<0.001

 body acceptance

2.06 (1.08–3.91)

0.027

 suggestion of a friend or family member

2.78 (1.61–4.82)

<0.001

Note: Variables significant (p <0.05) in univariate analysis and BB were adjusted for in the forward stepwise logistic regression analysis

OR Odds Ratio, CI Confidence Interval

aR2 = Nagelkerke

Reference group: those without DEB

Discussion

Our study showed that among young men, body-related motives to exercise were positively associated with disordered eating behavior (DEB), regardless of DEB’s trait. In addition, bulimic behavior (BB) was positively associated with motives related to competition in sports or suggestions from others but inversely associated with health/fitness-related motives. Perception of being overweight, poor self-rated health, and more leisure sitting time were positively associated with drive for thinness (DT), but only poor self-rated health was linked with BB.

In general, the prevalence of DEB was 6.9 % in the current study, which is consistent with previously reported prevalences of disordered eating and extreme weight control behaviors (from 6.5 % to 14 %) [4, 5, 12]. In this representative sample of young men, DT was the main type of disordered eating behavior. The prevalences in the present study (5.4 % for DT and 3.7 % for BB) are in accordance with a previous study [4]. However, a contrasting prevalence of DT and BB among young men has also been recently reported: 3.4 % for DT and 5.8 % for BB [34].

In the present study, DT was most prevalent among men who were subjectively or objectively perceived as being overweight. This is in accordance with a Finnish population-based twin study of men, in which larger body size was associated with higher DT scores, which, on the other hand, were associated with both overeating and restrictive eating [35]. Thus, DT may refer to aiming at weight loss, not objective thinness, as has been previously thought. This is also consistent with a previous study among young adult women [36]. In our obesogenic culture, it is common and even preferred to aim at becoming thinner, particularly if one is overweight. Also, men have been reported to strive for leanness and muscularity rather than thinness itself [10]. Even if DT may be a somewhat misleading term in this connection, most importantly, it can predict an eating disorder among young men [37]. More complicated is the thin line between normal and abnormal behavior and at what point DT turns into compulsive behavior that constricts one’s normal life.

According to our results, DT was also associated with poor self-rated health and more leisure sitting time. In a previous study, DT was associated with muscle dissatisfaction, which, in turn, was linked with a sedentary lifestyle [22]. In our study, DT was also associated with motives to exercise related to weight loss and body acceptance. Consistently, previous studies have demonstrated that exercising because of weight loss and attractiveness was associated with DT [14, 38]. Bratland-Sanda et al. suggested that these motives to exercise mainly stem from extrinsic factors instead of exercise itself. It is also possible that the social environment and media may cause pressure to lose weight and enhance appearance [39].

In the present study, poor self-rated health and several different motives to exercise (i.e., competition/success in sports, weight loss, body acceptance, and suggestions from others) were associated with having BB. On the contrary, the motives to exercise due to health benefits (i.e., health promotion, and muscular strength or physical performance) were inversely associated with having BB. In a recent study, BB and DEB were also associated with body-related (weight and appearance management) exercise motives [17], whereas those without DEB have been found to exercise more often for fun [14], indicating subjective wellbeing and constructive, intrinsic motives to exercise.

In our study, BB was unrelated to current weight—either under- or overweight. The finding is surprising compared to previously reported results that men are motivated to lose or gain weight because of, for example, athletic achievement [10], which is a risk factor for eating disorders in men [13]. Although current weight was not associated with BB in young men, weight loss and/or body acceptance as motives to exercise and a history of being overweight or losing weight were related to BB. Having previously been overweight, as was the case for one-third of our study participants with BB, has been shown to be associated with the development of eating disorders [10]. Also, due to recent growth spurts, binge eating may be hidden among young men who don’t have any overweight issues as of yet.

Furthermore, the amount of physical activity was not associated with DEB subscales, either in the present or in previous studies [14, 17], but low weekly physical activity was linked with body dissatisfaction [14]. Leisure sitting time was positively associated with DT in this study, which might also indicate a lower level of leisure physical activity.

The strength of our study is its population-based design with a representative sample of young men. Even if the DEB data was lacking from 40 % of the study population, comparison between responders and non-responders of the DEB questionnaires did not reveal differences in the essential study variables (weight, perceived weight, sedentary behavior, self-rated health). Furthermore, there are no previous studies investigating DEB traits among young men based on the EDI-3. A Finnish version of the EDI-2 with these subscales, but with somewhat different (more concise) scoring, has also been used [22, 35]; however, it has been criticized for being poorly suited for non-clinical populations [26]. Still, a limitation is that the EDI-3 questionnaire has been developed to assess eating disorders [in girls, not in young men], not DEB or its early and slight risks. Thus, there is lack of validation of the EDI-3 as a disordered eating behavior questionnaire in men, which is why validated cut-off scores do not exist. Also, the questionnaire lacks items that could be relevant to DEB among young men, such as muscle and body dissatisfaction [15, 21], sexuality [40], engaging in exercise as a compensatory behavior, and the desire to be lean instead of being thin [10].

Research is needed to help parents and various professionals in educational or health-care sectors to recognize DEB. Paying attention to symptoms of DEB in schools or during health check-ups, especially among overweight and obese young men with poor self-rated health, could be important for early prevention of adverse effects on health and wellbeing. Also, in physical education and organized sports, motives to exercise should be monitored, especially if they are purely body-related. The result of the present study may also benefit school-based interventions reducing DEB and preventing excess weight.

Conclusions

In this population-based study among young men, DEB was associated with non-health-related motives to exercise, such as competitive sports, weight loss, and body acceptance. Thus, early identification of young men with DEB may benefit from evaluating motives to exercise in addition to evaluation of sedentary behavior and self-perceptions of perceived weight and health. Development and validation of the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 subscales among young men is needed.

Abbreviations

BB, Bulimic behavior; BMI, Body mass index; CI, Confidence interval; DEB, Disordered eating behavior; DT, Drive for thinness; EDI-3, Eating Disorder Inventory-3; OR, Odds ratio; SD, Standard deviation

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the collaborators of the MOPO study team, including Oulu Deaconess Institute, University of Oulu, City of Oulu, Finnish Defense Forces, and Virpiniemi Sport Institute.

Funding

This study was supported by the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture (DNRO 125/627/2009, 98/627/2010, 97/627/2011), Centre for Military Medicine, the European Social Fund, the Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment of North Ostrobothnia (project number S11580), the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation and European Regional Development Funds (70037/2010 and 70035/2011), the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District, the Sports Institute Foundation, and the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation. They had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; writing the manuscript; or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The data will not be shared according to the Consortium Agreement that was made between the organizations involved in the study.

Authors’ contributions

MN designed the study design of this paper, conducted the statistical analysis, performed the literature search, and wrote the preliminary and the corrected versions of the manuscript. RK, MM, RP, RA, TMI, and HKH participated in the design of the MOPO study, and RK, RP, RA, and TMI participated in data collection. RK, A-MK, RP, RA, TMI, and HKH were involved in the interpretation of findings in the analysis and the designing of the tables. All authors took part in manuscript preparation and read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

There are no conflicts of interest associated with this publication, and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. R. Ahola is currently employed at Polar Electro Ltd. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District approved the study (ETTM123/2009). In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, all participants received written information regarding the study. Written informed consent to utilize the collected information for research purposes was obtained from all participants.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Oulu Deaconess Institute, P.O. BOX 365, FI-90101 Oulu, Finland
(2)
Center for Life Course Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, P.O. BOX 5000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
(3)
Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital of Oulu and University of Oulu, P.O. BOX 5000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
(4)
Clinical Research Center, Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Oulu, University of Oulu, P.O. BOX 5000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
(5)
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. BOX 100, FI-70029 Kuopio, Finland
(6)
Clinic of Child Psychiatry, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. BOX 26, FI-90029 OYS Oulu, Finland
(7)
Departments of Psychiatry, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH), South Savonia Hospital District, Mikkeli; North Karelia Central Hospital, Joensuu; SOSTERI, Savonlinna; SOTE, Iisalmi; Lapland Hospital District, Rovaniemi, Finland
(8)
Center for Environmental and Respiratory Health Research, University of Oulu, P.O. BOX 5000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
(9)
Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, P.O. BOX 5000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland

References

  1. Suokas JT, Suvisaari JM, Gissler M, Löfman R, Linna MS, Raevuori A, et al. Mortality in eating disorders: a follow-up study of adult eating disorder patients treated in tertiary care, 1995–2010. Psychiatry Res. 2013;210(3):1101–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rancourt D, McCullough MB. Overlap in eating disorders and obesity in adolescence. Curr Diab Rep. 2015;15(10):78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Neumark-Sztainer D, Eisenberg ME. Body image concerns, muscle-enhancing behaviors, and eating disorders in males. JAMA. 2014;312(20):2156–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Reyes-Rodríguez ML, Sala M, Von Holle A, Unikel C, Bulik CM, Camara-Fuentes L, et al. A description of disordered eating behaviors in Latino males. J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(4):266–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Wille N, Hölling H, Vloet TD, Ravens-Sieberer U. Disordered eating behaviour and attitudes, associated psychopathology and health-related quality of life: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adoles Psy. 2008;17 Suppl 1:82–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gadalla TM. Psychiatric comorbidity in eating disorders: a comparison of men and women. J Men's Health. 2008;5(3):209–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. McBride O, McManus S, Thompson J, Palmer RL, Brugha T. Profiling disordered eating patterns and body mass index (BMI) in the English general population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48(5):783–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Neumark-Sztainer D, Wall M, Larson NI, Eisenberg ME, Loth K. Dieting and disordered eating behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood: findings from a 10-year longitudinal study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(7):1004–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Ackard DM, Fulkerson JA, Neumark-Sztainer D. Stability of eating disorder diagnostic classifications in adolescents: five-year longitudinal findings from a population-based study. Eat Disord. 2011;19(4):308–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Strother E, Lemberg R, Stanford SC, Turberville D. Eating disorders in men: underdiagnosed, undertreated, and misunderstood. Eat Disord. 2012;20(5):346–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hautala LA, Junnila J, Helenius H, Väänänen A-M, Liuksila P-R, Räihä H, et al. Towards understanding gender differences in disordered eating among adolescents. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(13):1803–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Neumark-Sztainer DR, Wall MM, Haines JI, Story MT, Sherwood NE, van den Berg PA. Shared risk and protective factors for overweight and disordered eating in adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(5):359–69. e3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Weltzin TE, Weisensel N, Franczyk D, Burnett K, Klitz C, Bean P. Eating disorders in men: update. J Men's Health Gender. 2005;2(2):186–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Bratland-Sanda S, Sundgot-Borgen J. Symptoms of eating disorders, drive for muscularity and physical activity among Norwegian adolescents. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012;20(4):287–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Stanford SC, Lemberg R. Measuring eating disorders in men: development of the Eating Disorder Assessment for Men (EDAM). Eat Disord. 2012;20(5):427–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jáuregui Lobera I, Tomillo Cid S, Santiago Fernández MJ, Bolaños RP. Body shape model, physical activity and eating behaviour. Nutricion Hospitalaria. 2011;26(1):201–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Maïano C, Morin AJS, Lanfranchi M-C, Therme P. Body-related sport and exercise motives and disturbed eating attitudes and behaviours in adolescents. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015;23(4):277–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Liechty JM, Lee M-J. Longitudinal predictors of dieting and disordered eating among young adults in the U.S. Int J Eat Disord. 2013;46(8):790–800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Neumark-Sztainer D, Wall M, Story M, Standish AR. Dieting and unhealthy weight control behaviors during adolescence: associations with 10-year changes in body mass index. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(1):80–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Loth KA, MacLehose R, Bucchianeri M, Crow S, Neumark-Sztainer D. Predictors of dieting and disordered eating behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55(5):705–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Valls M, Bonvin P, Chabrol H. Association between muscularity dissatisfaction and body dissatisfaction among normal-weight French men. J Men's Health. 2013;10(4):139–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Raevuori A, Keski-Rahkonen A, Bulik CM, Rose RJ, Rissanen A, Kaprio J. Muscle dissatisfaction in young adult men. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2006;2:6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Edwards C, Tod D, Molnar G. A systematic review of the drive for muscularity research area. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2014;7(1):18–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. van den Berg PA, Mond J, Eisenberg M, Ackard D, Neumark-Sztainer D. The link between body dissatisfaction and self-esteem in adolescents: similarities across gender, age, weight status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47(3):290–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Garner DM. Eating Disorder Inventory-3. Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 2004.Google Scholar
  26. Clausen L, Rosenvinge JH, Friborg O, Rokkedal K. Validating the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3): a comparison between 561 female eating disorders patients and 878 females from the general population. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2011;33(1):101–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nigg CR, Rossi JS, Norman GJ, Benisovich SV. Structure of decisional balance for exercise adoption. Ann Behav Med. 1998;20:211.Google Scholar
  28. Markland D, Ingledew DK. The measurement of exercise motives: factorial validity and invariance across gender of a revised Exercise Motivations Inventory. Br J Health Psychol. 1997;2(4):361–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ingledew DK, Markland D. The role of motives in exercise participation. Psychol Health. 2008;23(7):807–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. World Health Organization (WHO). Using Body Mass Index. 2014. https://www.health.qld.gov.au/nutrition/resources/hphe_usingbmi.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov, 2015.
  31. Väinämö K, Nissilä S, Mäkikallio T, Tulppo M, Röning J. Artificial neural networks for aerobic fitness approximation. Proc IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw. 1996;4:1939–44.Google Scholar
  32. Lang T. Twenty statistical errors even YOU can find in biomedical research articles. Croat Med J. 2004;45(4):361–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Muro-Sans P, Amador-Campos JA, Morgan JF. The SCOFF-c. Psychometric properties of the Catalan version in a Spanish adolescent sample. J Psychosom Res. 2008;64(1):81–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Torstveit MK, Aagedal-Mortensen K, Stea TH. More than half of high school students report disordered eating: a cross sectional study among Norwegian boys and girls. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0122681.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Keski-Rahkonen A, Bulik CM, Neale BM, Rose RJ, Rissanen A, Kaprio J. Body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness in young adult twins. Int J Eat Disord. 2005;37(3):188–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Chernyak Y, Lowe MR. Motivations for dieting: drive for thinness is different from drive for objective thinness. J Abnorm Psychol. 2010;119(2):276–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Stanford SC, Lemberg R. A clinical comparison of men and women on the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3) and the Eating Disorder Assessment for Men (EDAM). Eat Disord. 2012;20(5):379–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Furnham A, Calnan A. Eating disturbance, self-esteem, reasons for exercising and body weight dissatisfaction in adolescent males. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 1998;6(1):58–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Goodwin H, Haycraft E, Meyer C. Sociocultural correlates of compulsive exercise: is the environment important in fostering a compulsivity towards exercise among adolescents? Body Image. 2011;8(4):390–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Dakanalis A, Di Mattei VE, Bagliacca EP, Prunas A, Sarno L, Riva G, et al. Disordered eating behaviors among Italian men: objectifying media and sexual orientation differences. Eat Disord. 2012;20(5):356–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nurkkala et al. 2016

Advertisement

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us