Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Changes in abdominal obesity in Chilean university students stratified by body mass index

  • Marco Cossio-Bolaños1, 2, 3, 8Email author,
  • Catalina Vilchez-Avaca3, 4,
  • Victor Contreras-Mellado3, 4, 5,
  • Cynthia Lee Andruske3 and
  • Rossana Gómez-Campos2, 6, 7
BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:33

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2587-3

Received: 20 March 2015

Accepted: 9 December 2015

Published: 13 January 2016

Abstract

Background

Studies based on Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) are generally used to examine the prevalence and tendency of overweight and obesity. These studies help determine the socioeconomic development of a country and improve public health policies. Therefore, the goal of this research was to determine the trend of change in abdominal obesity of Chilean university students according to the Body Mass Index (BMI) measured in intervals of three and six years.

Methods

For this study, a total of 1598 students of both sexes ranging in age from 18 to 26 from a Chilean university were evaluated. Students were assessed commencing in 2007 (372 males and 315 females), 2010 (250 males and 330 females), and ending in 2013 (153 males and 178 females). During the three transversal assessments, weight, height, and waist circumference were evaluated. BMI was calculated for both sexes.

Results

No significant differences were found in age and BMI during the three years evaluated (2007, 2010, and 2013). In 2013, waist circumference (WC) increased significantly (p < 0.001 for both sexes). Moreover, in 2013, in all the percentiles evaluated, high values of WC were compared in relation to previous years. Furthermore, in 2013, in all four BMI categories (underweight, normal, overweight, and obese), the university students showed significant increases in WC (Females: p = 0.004; Males: p = 0.035) whereas in 2007 and 2010, the values remained relatively stable.

Conclusions

BMI remained constant during 2007, 2010, and 2013. However, the university students of both sexes showed greater risk of abdominal obesity as a result of increased WC in 2013.

Background

Student trends have become important work for human biological researchers to determine the socioeconomic development of a country for improving public health policies [1]. A secular trend is defined as the differences between individuals or groups of the same age and sex associated with the year or decade of birth [2]. It has become an important biological indicator in terms of health. Furthermore, these types of studies possess a fundamental characteristic that allows one to infer the increase of the prevalence of diseases associated with obesity, hypertension, glucose intolerance, and dyslipidemia, not only the early type found in childhood and adolescence but also during adulthood.

A number of studies have established various criteria to determine secular trends in children, adolescents, and adults [35]. Currently, researchers have directed their attention to studying the prevalence and tendency of overweight and obesity. These studies are based on Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) [6], generally used for studying diverse populations worldwide [7].

In general, during the last decades, it has been widely acknowledged that height has tended to stabilize primarily in the developed countries. However, weight continues to increase resulting in forms of obesity [8] and increasing with greater frequency worldwide [7, 9]. In fact, various countries in South America are in the process of nutritional transition. Therefore, it is expected that these societies experience important changes in their demographics, in their diets, and in their respective lifestyles.

In essence, Chile is not far behind in this trend. In the past few years, a number of studies have shown an increased prevalence for overweight, obesity, and metabolic risk in young university students [1013]. This excessive increase is related to the rapid socio-economic advances seen in the last decades [14, 15]. Therefore, the assumption is that young university students studying probably demonstrate significant changes in body fat in short periods of time. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the trend in changes in abdominal obesity in Chilean university students in relation to the BMI in measured intervals of three and six years.

Methods

Study design, sample and subjects

The research design was cross-sectional. In this study, young Chilean university students from the University of Talca (UTAL), Lircay Campus UTAL (Talca, Chile) answered three transversal questionnaires in 2007, 2010, and 2013. UTAL is a Chilean state university. It is located northeast of the city of Talca. It is 270 km south of Santiago (the capital of Chile). The economy of Talca is based primarily on agriculture and cattle while the wine industry plays a significant role in the local economy.

For the three years of this study, non-probabilistic sampling (quotas) was used. The data collected from the first survey included responses from 687 university students (372 males and 315 females); for the second survey, 580 (250 males and 330 females); and for the third survey, 331 (153 males and 178 females) for a total of 1598 young university students. Furthermore, during all three years, subjects dropped out of the study. The attrition rate ranged from 12.7-to-15.6 % for males and 18.3 % for females. Age ranged from 18 to 26 years. Students below and above the established age range, those not providing informed consent, or students not attending the day of the evaluation were excluded from the research. Students were recruited from their respective faculties and invited to participate voluntarily.

Collection of the anthropometric information was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Talca (UTAL). All of the subjects provided informed consent before anthropometric information was collected from them.

Anthropometric measurements

All anthropometric data was collected at the beginning of each academic year of the study (March-April). The technical personnel were trained prior to collecting data in order to become familiar with the standardized evaluation measurement protocol for collecting anthropometric data. Each research year, 10 % of the sample was evaluated twice. The technical measurement error (TME) was less than 2 % for the three evaluation years. In effect, the protocol described by the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) [16] was used as the basis for the study. Weight (kg) was measured with a Tanita digital (United Kingdom, Ltd.) scale with a precision of 100 g and a scale of 0 to 50 kg. Height (cm) was measured with an aluminum Seca estadiometer (Seca Gmbh & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany) graduated in millimeters with a scale of 0 to 250 cm. The circumference of the waist (cm) was measured at the mid-point between the lower ribs and the top of the iliac crest with a metal belt Seca measuring tape in millimeters with a precision of 0.1 cm.

The BMI (kg/m2) was used to classify the young university students into categories of Underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), Normal (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2), Overweight (25 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2), and Obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) [17].

Statistical analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test was run on all the variables. It was conducted separately for each sex and evaluation year in order to determine the normal distribution. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics in order to find the frequencies and percentages for the variable categories. Means and standard deviation (SD) were determined for the continuous variables. In addition, percentile distribution was determined: p5, p15, p50, p85, and p95.

The differences between the three evaluation years and the differences between the four BMI categories were verified by one-way ANOVA. Post hoc Tukey test was used to identify points of difference. Differences between percentiles were verified through fraction 100 log (percentile from 2007/2010, 2007/2013, 2010/2013). SPSS 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) wias used for the statistical analysis, adopting a level of significance of 5 %.

Results

Table 1 below shows the characteristics and evaluations of the students enrolled in the university during the 3 year project.
Table 1

Characteristics of the sample studied

  

Males

Females

Total

n

%

n

%

Age distribution

 <20 years

826

376

23.5

450

28.2

 21–23 years

641

320

20

321

20.1

 >24 years

131

82

5.1

49

3.1

 Total

1598

778

48.6

820

51.4

Year of data collection

 2007

687

373

23.3

314

19.7

 2010

580

252

15.8

328

20.5

 2013

331

153

9.6

178

11.1

 Total

1598

778

48.7

820

51.3

% percentage, n sample

Table 2 shows the means and ± SD for age, weight, height, and WC for both sexes of the university students. No significant differences were found in age and BMI during 2007, 2010, and 2013. The mean values remained relatively stable in 2007 and 2010. However, during the 2013 evaluation, both sexes showed significant increases in body weight and WC when compared with the 2007 and 2010 evaluations. With regard to the prevalence of overweight and obesity, values increased in both sexes (4.1 % for males and 6.8 % for females) throughout 2007 to 2013. Only two categories, overweight and obese, were considered since an abnormal accumulation of fat may cause health problems.
Table 2

Mean and SD values for age and anthropometric characteristics and prevalence of overweight and obesity in young university students

Variables

 

Males

Females

Years

n

X

SD

n

X

SD

Age (years)

2007

373

21.0

1.8

314

20.5

1.6

2010

252

20.8

1.8

328

20.6

1.7

2013

153

20.9

2.2

178

20.7

2.0

Total

778

20.9

1.9

820

20.6

1.7

Weight (kg)

2007

373

72.4

11.3

314

59.6

8.5

2010

252

72.5

10.5

328

60.1

10.5

2013

153

74.5

12.6ab

178

62

10.5ab

Total

778

72.9

11.3

820

60.3

9.8

Height (cm)

2007

373

172.7

6.7

314

161.1

6.0

2010

252

174.4

5.8

328

161.7

6.0

2013

153

173.6

6.4

178

161.1

5.7

Total

778

173.4

6.4

820

161.3

5.9

Waist Circumference (cm)

2007

373

83.9

9.2

314

76.0

7.7

2010

252

83.8

7.9

328

75.8

9.1

2013

153

89.4

10.0ab

178

83.4

10.5ab

Total

778

84.6

9.3

820

77.6

9.4

BMI (kg/m2)

2007

373

24,3

3,2

314

22,9

2,9

2010

252

23,8

3

328

23

3,5

2013

153

24.6

3.8

178

23.9

3.6

Total

778

24.2

3.3

820

23.1

3.3

   

Overweight

Obesity

 

Overweight

Obesity

Prevalence BMI (BMI categories)

2007

373

96 (25.7 %)

19 (5.1 %)

314

57 (18.2 %)

7 (2.2 %)

2010

252

66 (26.2 %)

15 (6.0 %)

328

42 (12.8 %)

19 (5.8 %)

2013

153

49 (32.0 %)

14 (9.2 %)

178

38 (21.3 %)

16 (9.0 %)

Total

778

211 (27.1 %)

48 (6.2 %)

820

137 (16.7 %)

42 (5.1 %)

X means, SD Standard deviation, BMI Body mass index

asignificant difference in relation to 2007 (p < 0.05); bsignificant difference in relation to 2010 (p < 0.05)

Table 3 below illustrates the comparisons of BMI and WC based on percentile distributions. For both sexes, the BMI values were relatively similar in percentiles p5, p15, and p50. However, for 2013, the increase was relatively significant when percentiles p85 and p95 were compared to the two previous years. In this sense, a slight positive increase in BMI occurred in percentiles p85 and p95. These increases amounted to 2.8–4.1 cm in males and 2.7–5.9 cm in females.
Table 3

Comparison of the body fat (BMI and WC) of young university students of both sexes by percentile during 2007, 2010, and 2013

Years

n

 

BMI (kg/m2)

 

WC (cm)

Centiles

5

15

50

85

95

5

15

50

85

95

Males

 2007

373

20.0

21.0

24.0

27.6

30.9

71.0

75.0

83.0

90.0

100.1

 2010

252

20.0

21.0

23.7

26.8

29.5

71.0

75.0

82.0

90.0

100.3

 2013

153

20.0

21.0

23.9

28.7

33.2

76.0

80.0

88.0

99.0

109.3

 a) Log 2007/2010

--

0.0

0.0

−0.5

−1.3

−2.0

0.0

0.0

−0.5

0.0

0.1

 b) Log 2007/2013

--

0.0

0.0

−0.2

1.7

3.1

3.0

2.8

2.5

4.1

3,8

 c) Log 2010/2013

--

0.0

0.0

0.4

3.0

5.1

3.0

2.8

3.1

4.1

3,7

Females

 2007

314

19.0

20.3

22.7

25.6

27.9

64.0

68.0

75.0

85.0

90.0

 2010

328

19.0

20.0

22.2

26.0

30.4

64.8

68.0

75.1

86.0

93.3

 2013

178

19.0

20.5

23.3

27.0

31.5

69.0

73.0

82.5

93.2

103.1

 a) Log 2007/2010

--

0.0

−0.6

−1.0

0.7

3.7

0.5

0.0

0.1

0.5

1.6

 b) Log 2007/2013

--

0.0

0.4

1.1

2.3

5.3

3.3

3.1

4.1

4.0

5.9

 c) Log 2010/2013

--

0.0

1.1

2.1

1.6

1.5

2.7

3.1

4.1

3.5

4.3

Log logarithm, a = 100 log(percentile of 2007 /calculated percentile 2010), b = 100 log(percentile of 2007 /calculated percentile 2013), c = 100 log(percentile of 2010 /calculated percentile 2013)

With regard to the WC in the percentile distributions (p5, p15, p50, p85, and p95), particularly during the 2013 measurement, a positive tendency in increase in central abdominal obesity was observed. However, in the first two years (2007 and 2010), the percentile values were relatively similar but less than those of 2013. This pattern is reflected in the increase in the number of cases of overweight and obesity observed during 2013.

Based on the four categories of BMI, Fig. 1 shows the mean and ± SD values for WC. The students of both sexes classified as underweight BMI (less than 18.5 kg/m2) showed mean values similar to the WC during the three evaluation years. However, in the other three categories (normal, overweight, and obese), the young university students showed significant increases in WC during 2013 when compared to 2007 and 2010 (p < 0.05) where the values remained relatively stable(p > 0.05
Fig. 1

Mean values and ± SD of WC based on BMI categories and measurement years by sex. a significant difference in the same nutritional category in 2007; b significant difference in the same nutritional category in 2010

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that BMI did not change over time. However, the WC increased significantly in both sexes especially during the last evaluation. The findings reflect the presence of accelerated secular changes in body fat estimated by WC. These findings are consistent with other studies carried out internationally [1820]. These studies confirmed the increased trends in WC in both sexes extended over time. Since the WC is an anthropometric measure that reflects the central body fat, it is important to point out that the greatest increase in body fat distribution occurred from 2010 to 2013.

These findings are not only worrisome for the sample of university students studied in Talca but also those university students living in the surrounding Maule region of Chile. Therefore, it is important to take preventative measures to control excess weight and obesity in young Chilean university students [10]. Also this research may be used to raise awareness in other countries since recent studies continue to show elevated rates of overweight and obesity in university students around the world [10, 13]. Evidently, this trend can be interpreted as greater levels of abdominal body fat creating a potentially greater risk for young university students to develop related illnesses such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular illnesses, cancer, and death caused by obesity [18, 21, 22].

In general, a large portion of our sample of both males and females in the 2013 evaluation year of this study were found to be above the normal standard values. Young university students included in this study in percentiles 85 and 95 had higher values in the WC. These findings suggest that during very short intervals of time, the body shape of these young university students changed at an accelerated rate.

In essence, our results demonstrate that a large portion of the university population is at significant risk for developing chronic non-communicable diseases. This is due to the greater WC for the same BMI particularly during the 2013 evaluation measurement. In fact, this behavior could be associated with multiple factors such as poor eating habits, an increase in sedentary behaviors [23]. In general, these factors could create the predisposition for the disproportionate increase in WC among the young university students in this sample studied. However, economic development, increased urbanization, and excessive consumption of fats [24] in Chile during the past few years cannot be ruled as contributing factors in these changes observed.

In 1988, the Chilean government created the National Council for Health Promotion and introduced public policies in an attempt to combat the challenges of the epidemiology of obesity [25]. Other endeavors were also undertaken like the proposal for a Global Strategy to Combat Obesity introduced at the 2006 EGO-Chile [26]. Moreover in 2012, approval and publication of the national nutritional labelling law for food were obtained [27]. Despite these government’s efforts, abdominal fat, at least among the young university students studied, continues to increase on a grand scale.

Identifying the limitations in this study will help improve the design for future research projects. First of all, the sample cohorts were selected through non-probabilistic sampling (accidental). This does not allow generalization of the results to other university populations in Chile. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution. In the second place, it was not possible to measure more variables related to body composition, physical activity, and eating habits of the sample. Therefore, in future research, these variables need to be taken into account since controlling for these variables could contribute to identifying the actual factors that contribute to the excessive increase in obesity in young university students. Furthermore, we suggest extending the research to other regions in Chile with the goal of including other universities with similar characteristics.

On the other hand, the process of data collection took place appropriately by maintaining a standardized protocol with an evaluation team with extensive experience in anthropometric measurement. Furthermore, the sample from this project was representative since it included students from the majority of the professional programs. This allowed a greater evaluation of changes in body fat amongst diverse University of Talca Chilean students. Moreover, during the three measurements taken, the same intervals of time were maintained between the evaluations. Furthermore, a strict order and sequencing in the methodology was adhered to ensuring an adequate methodological design.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results showed that the BMI remained constant during 2007, 2010, and 2013. However, the young university students of both sexes may have a tendency for a greater risk of abdominal obesity. These results suggest a potential adverse cardio metabolic risk in the university populations of Talca. Thus, it is urgent that obesity prevention programs be instituted within the universities.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body Mass Index

WC: 

Waist circumference

SD: 

Standard deviation

UTAL: 

University of Talca, Lircay Campus

TME: 

Technical Measurement Error

Declarations

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the official policy or position of the U.S. Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Catholic University of Maule
(2)
Faculty of Physical Education, State University of Campinas
(3)
Red Iberoamericana Biological Research in Human Development
(4)
Program of sports and physical activity, Universidad de Talca
(5)
Master of Science in Physical Activity, Catholic University of Maule
(6)
Universidad Autonoma de Chile
(7)
Universidad Científica del Sur
(8)

References

  1. Komlos J. How useful is anthropometric history? Munich Discussion Paper No.2009/6, Department of Economics, University of Munich: Munich, Germany; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Roche AF. Secular trends in human growth, maturation, and development. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1979;44(3–4):1–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991. JAMA. 1994;272(3):205–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. High body mass index for age among US children and adolescents, 2003–2006. JAMA. 2008;299(20):2401–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Albrecht S, Barquera S, Popkin BM. Exploring secular changes in the association between BMI and waist circumference in mexican-origin and white women: A Comparison of Mexico and the United States. Am J Hum Biol. 2014;26:627–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Sun SS, Deng X, Sabo R, Carrico R, Schubert CM, Wan W, et al. Secular trends in body composition for children and young adults: The fels longitudinal study. Am J Hum Biol. 2012;24(4):506–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Unalan D, Senol V, Bayat M, Mazicioglu MM, Ozturk A, Kurtoglu S, et al. Change in waist circumference over 3 years in Turkish children and adolescents. Ann Hum Biol. 2013;40(5):419–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron N. Human Growth and Development, Academic Press. USA: Elsevier Science Company; 2002. p. 205.Google Scholar
  9. Rolland-Cachera M, Deheeger M, Maillot M, Bellisle F. Early adiposity rebound: Causes and consequences for obesity in children and adults. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30:S11–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Martínez MA, Leiva AM, Sotomayor C, Victoriano T, Von Chrismar AM, Pineda S. Factores de riesgo cardiovascular en estudiantes de la Universidad Austral de Chile. Rev Med Chile. 2012;140:426–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Santos CS, Contreras AMM, Bawarshi YA, Faúndez CC, Fuentes EQ, Palomo IG. Anthropometric characteristics, physical fitness and lifestyles of university students in the Maule region of Chile. Gazz Med Ital Arch Sci Med. 2013;172(6):487–94.Google Scholar
  12. Vera-Villarroel P, Piqueras JA, Kuhne W, Cuijpers P, Van Straten A. Differences between men and women in self reported body mass index and its relation to drug use. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014;9(1):2–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wosu A, Vélez J, Barbosa C, Andrade A, Frye M, Chen X, et al. The Relationship between High Risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea and General and Central Obesity: Findings from a Sample of Chilean College Students. ISRN Obes. 2014;2014:8. Article ID 871681. doi: 10.1155/2014/871681.
  14. Muzzo S, Burrows R, Cordero J, Ramırez I. Trends in nutritional status and stature among school-age children in Chile. Nutrition. 2004;20(10):868–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. Chile Country Profile: Human Development Indicators; 2013.Google Scholar
  16. International Society For the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). International Standards For Anthropometric Assessment. Nueva Zelanda, Australia: Internacional Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry; 2001.Google Scholar
  17. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: executive summary. Expert panel on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight in adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68:899–917.Google Scholar
  18. Li C, Ford ES, McGuire LC, Mokdad AH. Increasing trends in waist circumference and abdominal obesity among US adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15:216–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Janssen I, Shields M, Craig CL, Tremblay MS. Changes in the obesity phenotype within Canadian children and adults, 1981 to 2007–2009. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20:916–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Xi B, Liang Y, He T, Reilly KH, Hu Y, Wang Q, et al. Secular trends in the prevalence of general and abdominal obesity among Chinese adults, 1993–2009. Obes Rev. 2012;13(3):287–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Waist circumference and not body mass index explains obesityrelated health risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:379–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bigaard J, Frederiksen K, Tjønneland A, Thomsen L, Overvad K, Heitmann L, et al. Waist circumference and body composition in relation to all-cause mortality in middle-aged men and women. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005;29:778–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Deliens T, Clarys P, Van Hecke L, De Bourdeaudhuij L, Deforche B. Changes in weight and body composition during the first semester at university. A prospective explanatory study. Appetite. 2013;65:111–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Albala C, Vio F, Kain J, Uauy R. Nutrition transition in Chile: Determinants and consequences. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(1A):123–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vio F, Salinas J. Promoción de salud y calidad de vida en Chile: Una política con nuevos desafíos. Rev Chil Nutr. 2006;33(S1):252–9.Google Scholar
  26. Ministerio de Salud. Estrategia Global contra la Obesidad (EGOChile). Santiago: Ministerio de Salud; 2008. Avaliable in http://www.sochipe.cl/subidos/revista1/docs/EGO.pdf.
  27. Corvalán C, Reyes M, Garmendia ML, Uauy R. Structural responses to the obesity and non-communicable diseases epidemic: The Chilean Law of Food Labeling and Advertising. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:79–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Cossio-Bolaños et al. 2016

Advertisement