Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Structured additive regression models with spatial correlation to estimate under-five mortality risk factors in Ethiopia

BMC Public Health201515:268

Received: 15 October 2014

Accepted: 2 March 2015

Published: 19 March 2015



The risk of a child dying before reaching five years of age is highest in Sub-Saharan African countries. But Child mortality rates have shown substantial decline in Ethiopia. It is important to identify factors affecting under-five mortality.


A structured additive logistic regression model which accounts the spatial correlation was adopted to estimate under-five mortality risk factors. The 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey data was used for this study.


The analysis showed that the risk of under-five mortality increases as the family size approaches seven and keeps increasing. With respect to socio-economic factors, the greater the household wealth, the lower the mortality. Moreover, for older mothers, the chance of their child to dying before reaching five is diminishes.


The model enables simultaneous modeling of possible nonlinear effects of covariates, spatial correlation and heterogeneity. Our findings are relevant because the identified risk factors can be used to provide priority areas for intervention activities by the government to combat under-five mortality in Ethiopia.


Child mortality Spatial model GAMM Household EDHS


In the Sub-Saharan African countries, child mortality rate is highest (95 per 1000 live births), about 8 times higher than that in the WHO European Region (12 per 1000 live births) [1,2]. Most of the Sub-Saharan African countries, including Ethiopia, still have very high rates which are above 100 deaths per 1,000 live births [3,4]. In 2013, the rate in low income countries was 76 deaths per 1,000 live births, i.e., more than 13 times the average rate in high income countries (6 deaths per 1,000 live births). Strategies aimed at reducing these inequities across countries and saving more children’s lives by ending preventable child deaths are important priorities [5,6].

In recent years, under-five child mortality has shown a decline in Ethiopia, Malawi and Namibia, but in other African countries it has remained the same. Child survival in the first 5 years of life is influenced by different socio-economic, demographic or geographic risk factors. Studies were conducted at sub-national or national level in different African countries and identified different socio-economic and demographic factors. The other studies focused on identifying geographical variation and they recommended under-five mortality maps as useful tool for monitoring under-five mortality in different countries [7-10].

Within a country, child mortality is expected to vary greatly across risk factors and/or spatial distributions. The attempts to spatially analyze child mortality and risk factors associated with it in Ethiopia are limited due to the lack of geo-referenced data [11]. However, recent demographic and health surveys carried out in the country have had extensive coverage and collect geographical coordinates to permit the investigation of spatial variability in under-five mortality risk. Mapping of areas with high under-five mortality under investigation is crucial in an economically constrained country like Ethiopia. The map enables efficient allocation of scarce resources. A study which uses risk factors and spatial risk mapping for Ethiopian below five years child mortality is long overdue. The study reported in the article investigated socio-economic, demographic and geographic risk factors for child mortality have significant effects. To achieve this objective, a structured additive regression model was adopted and a Bayesian framework using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) was used to analyze the 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) data.


Study area

Ethiopia is a Sub-Saharan country and is located in the eastern part of Africa. The first Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) was conducted in 2005. Since then EDHS has been conducted every five years to provide data in demographic and health risk factors in line with the country’s health and development plans. The primary objectives of the EDHS were to provide up-to-date information for planning, policy formulation, monitoring and evaluation of population and health programmes in the country. In addition to these objectives, EDHS provides critical information for use as baseline data in monitoring and evaluation of the Growth and Transformation Plan as well as various sector development policies and programmes.

Data source

The data used for the analysis was obtained from the 2011 EDHS which was the third country-wide Demographic and Health survey conducted in Ethiopia. The survey took place over a five-month period, from 27 December 2010 through 3 June 2011 in Ethiopia. A total of 17,817 households were selected for data collection. The sampling frame used for the 2011 EDHS was the Population and Housing Census conducted by the Central Statistical Agency (CSA) in 2007 (2007 PHC). The 2011 EDHS sample was selected using a stratified, two-stage cluster design. Enumeration Areas (EA) were the sampling units for the first stage sampling. The sample included 624 EAs or clusters, 187 in urban areas and 437 in rural areas. Data was obtained from each of the eleven geographic regions in Ethiopia.

In the selected households, women and men were interviewed separately. For estimation at the national level, all data from the survey was weighted. The interviews were conducted on 9, 096 women aged 15-49 and 6,033 men aged 15-59. Thus, the 2011 EDHS sample was designed to provide estimates for the health and demographic variables of interest for Ethiopia as a whole; urban and rural area of Ethiopia comprising 11 geographical areas. The respondents were asked questions with regards to their background characteristics (age, education, media exposure, etc.), birth history and childhood mortality, knowledge and use of family planning methods, fertility preferences, antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care, breastfeeding and infant feeding practices, vaccinations and childhood illnesses, marriage and sexual activity, women’s work and husband’s background characteristics, awareness and behavior regarding AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), adult mortality, including maternal mortality and knowledge of tuberculosis. Besides these questions, the wealth index, such as television, bicycles for each household was computed using data on the household’s ownership of selected assets and sanitation facilities, example type of drinking water source and type of toilet facility. The EDHS datasets can be obtained upon request from MEASURE DHS. Based on the 2011 EDHS, statistical report on the data and other researches were produced. The 2011 EDHS report and other published works can be accessed from the following sources [12-15].

In this study, the effects of nonlinear risk factors and the usual fixed effects of socio-economic, demographic and geographic risk factors was considered, while accounting for spatial effects. This type of Structured additive regression (STAR) model is also known as geo-additive model. The use of this model is important because of the increasing availability of disease and environmental data. The model adequately describes the variation of the disease for valid and realistic statistical inferences. For this study, we use a fully Bayesian estimation based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations. Making inferences based on a fully Bayesian approach is preferred because functionals of the posterior can be computed without relying on large Gaussian justification. This process helps to quantify the uncertainty in the parameters [16-18].

Statistical methods

Structured additive logistic regression model is used for this study. This method has many advantages compared to the conventional methods. This method provides a broad and generic framework for regression models incorporating continuous, discrete and mixed discrete-continuous response distributions. This method also expands the common exponential family framework. Using this method, the general guidelines for important model choice issues such as choosing an appropriate response distribution and determining a suitable predictor specification can be obtained based on quantile residuals, the deviance information criterion and proper scoring rules. Theoretically, results on the positive definiteness of the precision matrix in the proposal densities and the propriety of the posterior can be provided. Besides this, the Bayesian approach allows to borrow extensions developed for Bayesian mean regression such as multilevel structures, monotonicity constraint estimates, variable selection and regularization priors without the necessity to re-develop the complete inferential machinery [19-21].

Model specification

Let y i be the mortality status of under-five child i whose outcome is death, is recorded as 1, or 0 otherwise. This data follows a Bernoulli distribution
$$ {y}_i\sim Bernoulli\left({\pi}_i\right), $$

where π i is the probability of the death of a child. The risk of a child to die can be associated with explanatory variables using a generalized linear model (GLM) framework with the appropriate link function. GLMs are flexible to allow for non-normal response variables [22].

With the linear predictor \( {\eta}_i= log\left(\frac{\pi_i}{1-{\pi}_i}\ \right) = {w}_i^{\hbox{'}}\ {\alpha}_i \) where \( {w}_i^{\hbox{'}}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em {\left({w}_{i1},\ .\ .\ ., {w}_{ip}\right)}^{\hbox{'}} \) the GLM can be specified. Therefore, the ordinary regression can be specified as follows:
$$ {\eta}_i= log\left(\frac{\pi_i}{1-{\pi}_i}\right)={\beta}_0 + {w}_i^{\hbox{'}}\ {\alpha}_i $$
where β0 is the intercept, \( {w}_i^{\hbox{'}} \) is a vector of covariates and α i is a vector of regression coefficients. However, the standard GLM has some disadvantages, i.e., GLM assume independent (or at least uncorrelated) observations. But, this assumption is not always satisfied, sometimes observations exhibit spatial and/or temporal dependence. This variability has to be incorporated in the model. The linear predictor modified by taking into account the spatial autocorrelation, can be given as follows
$$ {\eta}_i={\alpha}_0 + {w}_i^{\hbox{'}}\ {\alpha}_i + {\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^q}{f}_k\left({x}_{ik}\right) + {\varnothing}_i + {v}_i $$

where α0 is the intercept, α1 is the parameter corresponding to the categorical fixed variables \( {w}_i^{\hbox{'}} = {\left({w}_{i1},\ .\ .\ ., {w}_{ip}\right)}^{\hbox{'}} \) and f k is an appropriate smoothing function of continuous covariates, x ik . To capture the unobserved spatial heterogeneity and over dispersion at each location, spatially unstructured random effects have been used. Equation 2 gives a class of models known as structured additive regression (STAR) models. Generalized additive models (GAM) [23], generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) [24] and geo-additive models [16] are special cases of the STAR models. All of these models make use of smooth functions to model covariate effects on the response variable. These models are increasingly being applied to model health impacts and outcomes such as spatial variation of infectious disease [25-31].

Prior distributions for covariates

For implementation of this model, a Bayesian approach which needs prior assumptions has to be used. In Bayesian analysis, all the regression coefficients and the smooth functions f i are considered as random variables and are assigned prior distributions. The question is how to select the priors. The concept involved in this selection can be reduced to concepts which are more familiar and more closely related to prior experience. If this is accomplished, it is possible to set values which can be translated into prior distribution. Therefore, for the coefficients α, an independent diffuse which appropriate choice to constant can be assumed. This is used due to the absence of any prior knowledge. Therefore, the possible alternative choice is a week informative multivariate Gaussian distribution.

For the functions f j (x), j = 1, . . . , p, the Bayesian P-splines has been used [20,21]. This approach assumes that an unknown smooth function f i of a covariate x j can be approximated by a polynomial spline of degree l defined on a set of equally spaced knots \( {x}_j^{min}={\zeta}_{j,0}<{\zeta}_{j,1} < .\ .\ . < {\zeta}_{j,s-1}<{\zeta}_{j,s}={x}_j^{max} \) within the domain of x j . Such a spline can be written in terms of a linear combination of d = s + l basis functions B m , i.e.
$$ {f}_j\left({x}_j\right) = {\displaystyle \sum_{m=1}^d}\kern0.5em {\xi}_{j,m}.\ {B}_m\left({x}_j\right). $$
The functions B m are only positive within an area spanned by 1 + 2 knots. This leads to the B-splines form a local basis. This property is used for the construction of the smoothness penalty for P-splines. The estimation of the vector of unknown regression coefficients from the data helps to be reduced to the estimation of f i (x j ). The important factor for this procedure is the choice of appropriate number of knots. It is important to choose large number of equally spaced knots. This is suggested by Eilers and Marx [20]. Hence, for Bayesian approach, penalized splines are introduced by replacing the difference penalties with their stochastic analogues. These analogues are first or second order random walk priors for the regression coefficients. A first order random walk prior for equidistant knots is given by:
$$ {\xi}_{j,m}=\kern0.5em {\xi}_{j,m-1} + {u}_{j,m},\ m=2,\ .\ .\ ., d, $$
and a second order random walk for equidistant knots by
$$ {\xi}_{j,m}=2{\xi}_{j,m-1}-{\xi}_{j,m-2}+{u}_{j,m},\ m=3,\ .\ .\ ., d, $$
where \( {u_{j,m}}^{\sim }N\left({\xi}_{j,m},{\tau}_j^2\right) \) are Gaussian errors. Diffuse priors ξj,1 const, or ξj,1 and ξj,2 const, are chosen as initial values, respectively. The joint distribution of the regression parameters ξj,m for a first order random walk is defined as:
$$ {\xi}_{j,m}\Big|{\xi}_{j,m-1}\kern0.75em \sim N\left({\xi}_{j,m},{\tau}_j^2\right) $$
and a second order random walk is defined as:
$$ {\xi}_{j,m}\Big|{\xi}_{j,m-1},{\xi_{j,m-2}}^{\sim }N\left(2{\xi}_{j,m-1} - {\xi}_{j,m-2},{\tau}_j^2\right) $$
From equations 4, 5, 6 and 7, it can be seen that the first order random walk induces a constant trend for the conditional expectation of ξj,m given ξj,m − 1 For the second order random walk, the results shows linear trend depending on the two previous values ξj,m − 1 and ξj,m − 2. Therefore, to compute the joint distribution of the regression parameters, the product of the conditional densities defined by the random walk priors is used. The general form of the prior for ξ j is a multivariate Gaussian distribution with density:
$$ p\left({\xi}_j\Big|{\tau}_j^2\right) \propto exp\left(-\frac{\xi_j^{\hbox{'}}{K_j}_j}{2{\tau}_j^2}\right), $$

where the precision matrix K j is penalty matrix (shrinks parameters towards zero). This value penalizes too abrupt jumps between neighboring parameters, i.e., k j  = rank (K j ) < dim(ξ j ) = d j . This value follows the prior for \( {\xi}_j\Big|{\tau}_j^2 \) and partially improper with Gaussian prior \( {\xi}_j\Big|{\tau}_j^2 \propto N\left(0;{\tau}_j^2{K}_j^{-}\right) \). Here, \( {K}_j^{-} \) is a generalized inverse of K j . The variance parameter \( {\tau}_j^2 \) controls the tradeoff between flexibility and smoothness. Therefore, large variance corresponds with a rough estimated function, and vice versa.

Spatial components

For the spatial component, the nearest neighbor Gaussian Markov random field model is used. This model is common in spatial statistics to express prior knowledge of the spatial effects. Suppose s ϵ {1, . . . , S} represent the locations of connected locations, then the locally dependent prior probability spatial structure can be specified as:
$$ {f}_{str}(s)\Big|{f}_{str}\left({s}^{\hbox{'}}\right),s\ne {s}^{\hbox{'}},{\tau}_{str}^{2\kern1em \sim }N\left(\frac{1}{N_s}{\displaystyle \sum_{s\epsilon {\theta}_s}}\kern0.5em {f}_{str}(s),\frac{\tau_{str}^2}{N_s}\right) $$
where N s is the number of adjacent spatial units and sθ s denotes that spatial unit s’ is a neighbor of spatial unit s. To ensure equal number of neighbors for each locations, a neighborhood structure can be selected based on the k th nearest neighbor method. Here, k represents the number of neighbors. Similar to the continuous functions f j , the tradeoff between flexibility and smoothness is controlled by the variance parameter \( {\tau}_{str}^2 \). For the unstructured spatial effects, parameters f unstr (s) are assumed to be i.i.d. Gaussian:
$$ {f}_{unstr}(s)\Big|{\tau}_{unstr}^{2\sim }N\left(0,{\tau}_{unstr}^2\right). $$
Therefore, parameters \( {\tau}_j^2,\ j=1,\ .\ .\ .,\ p,\ str,\ unstru \) are considered unknown. Therefore, in the second stage, highly dispersed inverse Gamma distributions \( p\left({\tau}_j^2\right)\sim IG\left({a}_j,{b}_j\right) \) with known hyper-parameters α j and b j are assigned. Therefore, corresponding probability density function is expressed as:
$$ p\left({\tau}_j^2\right) \propto {\left({\tau}_j^2\right)}^{-{a}_j-1}\ exp\left(\frac{b_j}{\tau_j^2}\right). $$

The model was implemented by running the MCMC algorithm. The MCMC algorithm was made using 10,000 iterations with a burn in of 1000 and 50 thinning parameters. The chosen models were run several times. This is done to ensure the choice of priors did not influence the results. This was done by running the chosen model several times by changing the prior parameters in estimates. Fully Bayesian analyses have been carried out with BayesX, software for Bayesian inference based on MCMC techniques. For the analysis, model diagnosis was performed based on MCMC post-estimation diagnosis, besides the implemented trace and autocorrelation plots, samples of the parameters were also extracted using function sample.

Ethical clearance

Ethical clearance for the survey was provided by the Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute (EHNRI) Review Board, the National Research Ethics Review Committee (NRERC) at the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Institutional Review Board of International Coach Federation (ICF) International, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).


Before performing the GAMM analysis, bivariate tests were carried out. This was done to determine which variables to include in the model. The cross tabulation, as an initial descriptive analysis method, was performed using chi-square tests to investigate the relationship between the outcome of child mortality and several categorical socio-economic, demographic and geographic variables at the 5% level of significant.

Figure 1 shows child mortality per sampled EA across all regions of Ethiopia. It clearly demonstrates that the Tigray, Benshangul-Gumuz and SNNP regions registered higher child mortality rate than the other regions during the survey period. However, the Amhara and Oromia regions registered the lowest mortality risk.
Figure 1

Observed mortality risk of children under five years of age for 624 EAs across Ethiopia.

Bivariate association between child mortality and risk factors

Table 1 shows the association between child mortality and selected socio-economic, demographic and geographic categorical variables. At the 5% level, a statistically significant association among geographic factors; region, place of residence and child mortality status was found (p-value < 0:0001). Among demographic variables and child mortality, significant association was observed, i.e., between religion, current marital status, and child mortality status. Similarly, significant association was found between whether a child is a twin or not and child mortality status. Furthermore, the time it takes to get water, source of drinking water, type of cooking fuel, type of toilet facility, main floor material, main roof material, main wall material, wealth index show a statistically significant association with child mortality. However, the respondent’s current pregnant status did not show a statistically significant association with child mortality risk (p-value = 0.057).
Table 1

Association between child mortality and socio-economic, demographic and geographic variables


Child is alive


No (%)

Yes (%)



355 (13.26%)

2323 (86.74%)



343 (17.45%)

1623 (82.55%)


666 (16.17%)

3452 (83.83%)


620 (14.36%)

3698 (85.64%)


232 (14.05%)

1419 (85.95%)


496 (20.09%)

1972 (79.90%)


631 (15.36%)

3476 (84.64%)


236 (18.32%)

1052 (81.68%)


176 (11.49%)

1356 (88.51%)

Addis Ababa

45 (5.46%)

779 (94.54%)

Dire Dawa

208 (14.65%)

1212 (85.35%)

Type of place of residence


375 (9.895%)

3415 (90.11%)



3633 (16.09%)

18947 (83.91%)



1336 (14.34%)

7982 (85.66%)



46 (14.47%)

272 (85.53%)


734 (14.53%)

4319 (85.47%)


1787 (15.94%)

9423 (84.06%)


40 (22.10%)

141 (77.90%)


63 (23.08%)

210 (76.92%)

Current marital status


3862 (15.35%)

21305 (84.66%)


Living with partner

146 (12.14%)

1057 (87.86%)

Currently pregnant

No or unsure

3550 (15.05%)

20031 (84.95%)



458 (16.42%)

2331 (83.58%)

Sex of child


2244 (16.55%)

11313 (83.45%)



1764 (13.77%)

11049 (86.24%)

Child is twin

Single birth

3763 (14.61%)

21991 (85.39%)


1st of multiple

122 (39.74%)

185 (60.26%)

2nd of multiple

122 (39.74%)

185 (60.26%)

3rd of multiple

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

Time to get water

On the premises

186 (8.51%)

1999 (91.49%)


1 - 30 min

2132 (16.279%)

10964 (83.72%)

31 - 60 min

826 (15.14%)

4631 (84.86%)

>61 min

838 (15.48%)

4575 (84.52%)

Source of drinking water

Tap water

805 (12.08%)

5859 (87.92%)


Protected water

1113 (16.01%)

5840 (83.99%)

Unprotected water

2077 (16.48%)

10525 (83.52%)

Type of cooking fuel


29 (5.49%)

499 (94.51%)


Coal, charcoal/wood

3638 (15.45%)

19906 (84.55%)

Straw/animal gung

329 (15.37%)

1812 (84.63%)

No food cooked in the house

12 (7.64%)

145 (92.36%)

Type of toilet facility

No toilet facility

1994 (16.28%)

10252 (83.72%)


Toilet with flush/pit latrine

1851 (14.36%)

11042 (85.64%)

Other toilet type

144 (13.52%)

921 (86.48%)

Main floor material


3716 (16.01%)

19495 (83.99%)



51 (16.09%)

266 (83.92%)


230 (8.53%)

2466 (91.47%)

Main roof material


2206 (16.80%)

10925 (83.20%)


Mat/plastic sheet/wood

248 (16.78%)

1230 (83.22%)

Corrugated iron/metal

1394 (13.19%)

9172 (86.81%)


150 (14.15%)

910 (85.85%)

Main wall material


3742 (15.54%)

20337 (84.46%)



114 (8.32%)

1255 (91.67%)

Wood planks/shingles

142 (18.16%)

640 (81.84%)

Wealth index


2065 (16.7%)

10294 (83.30%)



786 (16.11%)

4093 (83.89%)


1157 (12.70%)

7975 (87.30%)

Effect of categorical variables on child mortality

Odds ratios from the best fitting model show a relationship between the socio-economic, demographic and geographic categorical variables. The risk of child mortality is shown in Tables 2 and 3. Respondents who travel greater than 60 minutes to fetch water had 9.6% higher odds of their child dying before reaching five than those who use water from other premises (adjusted OR = 1.096, CI: 1.013, 1.199). Similarly, those who travel 30-60 minutes to fetch water had 7.6% higher odds for their child to die before that age than is the case with those using water from premises (adjusted OR = 1.076, CI: 1.030, 1.086). Persons who used charcoal/wood had 2.1% higher odds of having a child who would die before reaching five years (adjusted OR = 1.021, CI: 1.001, 1.042) compared to those respondents who use straw/animal dung.
Table 2

Parameter estimates for socio-economic variables












Distance to fetch water (Ref. On the premises)

1 - 30 min





31 - 60 min





Greater than 61 min





Source of drinking water (Ref. Unprotected water)

Protected water





Tap water





Cooking fuel (Ref. straw/animal gung)

Coal, charcoal/wood










No food cooked in the house





Toilet Facility (Ref. Toilet with flush/pit latrine)

No toilet facility





Other toilet type





Floor material (Ref. wood)











Roof material (Ref. Thatch/leaf/mud






Corrugated iron/metal





Mat/plastic sheet/wood





Wall material (Ref. Wood planks/shingles)











Smoking (Ref. yes)






* CI - Credible Interval.

Table 3

Parameter estimates for demographic and geographic variables







Region (Ref. Tigray)

Addis Ababa




















Dire Dawa






























Place of residence (Ref. Urban)






Religion (Ref. Traditional)


























Husband’s education (Ref. Secondary)

Don’t know










No education










Respondent currently working (Ref. Yes)






Currently pregnant (Ref. Yes)

No/don’t know





Sex of a child (Ref. male)






On the other hand, respondents who uses electricity had 8% lower odds of having a child dying before five (adjusted OR = 0.920, CI: 0.811, 0.989) compared those using straw/animal dung. The interviewed who use tap water for drinking, had 5.9% lower chance of an under-five child dying compared to those who use unprotected water. Respondents using toilet with flush/pit latrine had a 3.1% lower odds of child mortality than respondents who use other toilet types (adjusted OR = 0.969, CI: 0.850, 0.998). But, no toilet facility users in the study had 3.7% higher odds of child mortality than those using other toilet types (adjusted OR = 1.037, CI: 1.005, 1.157). People surveyed in this study who live in houses with concrete floor (28%) and earth/dung/sand floors (34.5%) had higher odds of child mortality than those living in wooden floor houses (adjusted OR = 1.281, CI: 1.072, 1.392 and OR = 1.345, CI: 1.044, 1.466 respectively). Those surveyed who live in houses with corrugated iron (0.4%) and mat/plastic sheet/wood (0.2%) roof had lower chance of child mortality than respondents who live with thatched/leaf/mud roof houses (adjusted OR = 0.996, CI: 0.886, 0.998 and OR = 0.998, CI: 0.979, 0.998 respectively). The odds of child mortality steadily dropped as wealth increased. Children from medium income households were found to have 30.9% lower mortality chances than those from poor households (adjusted OR = 0.691, CI: 0. 421, 0.997). The odds further dropped with children in richest households having 75.7% lower child mortality likelihood (adjusted OR = 0.243, CI: 0.114, 0.372). Children from the central region had 48% lower odds (adjusted OR = 1.48, CI: 1.012, 2.421) than those from the poor households.

Odds ratios from the best fitting model showing the relationship between demographic and geographic categorical variables and the risk of child mortality are shown in Table 3. The table reveals that except for religion and husband’s education, the rest of the demographic and geographic variables had significant effect on child mortality in Ethiopia. Children who live in Amhara region had 0.07% higher odds of child mortality than those living in Tigray region (adjusted OR = 1.007, CI: 1.002, 1.018). Followed by Dire Dawa (adjusted OR = 1.051, CI: 1.014, 1.151), Gambella (adjusted OR = 1.458, CI: 1.006, 1.459) and Benishangul-Gumuz (adjusted OR = 1.182, CI: 1.046, 1.189) regions. In contrast, children who live in Harari region had 21% lower odds of having high mortality (adjusted OR = 0.789, CI: 0.782, 0.985) compared to child who live in Tigray region. On the other hand, children from rural areas had 9.4% higher odds of child mortality than their urban counterparts (adjusted OR = 1.094, CI: 1.014, 1.099). Respondents who are currently working had 4.3% lower odds of child mortality before the age of five than those who are not working (adjusted OR = 0.837, CI: 0.995, 1.045). Persons who are not pregnant or do not know about it had 20% lower odds (adjusted OR = 0.800, CI: 0.787, 0.959) than pregnant respondents. Similarly, the odds of a female child reaching age five is lower (21.3%) than that of a male child (adjusted OR = 0.787, CI: 0.747, 0.971).

Effect of continuous covariates on child mortality in Ethiopia

In addition to categorical effects, there were continuous effects which were handled non-parametrically to the model. These effects are number of household members, number of children at age five and under in a household, age of respondent at 1st birth, age at first sex, total children ever born, age of respondent and birth order number. The result shows that age of respondent at 1st birth, age at first sex, total children ever born, birth order number and age of respondent had non-linear significant effect on child mortality in Ethiopia. The possible nonlinear effects of the continuous covariates after accounting for other variables are presented in Figure 2 together with 95% credible intervals. In the figure, the dashed lines represent the 95% credible intervals. The figures suggest that age of respondents, number of household members, number of children at age five and under in a household, age of respondent at 1st birth, age at first sex, total children ever born and birth order number effects all depart dramatically from linearity. In each panel, the smooth line is the estimated trend from a generalized additive mixed model for the model with spherical Gaussian covariance structure. Figure 2A shows the estimated smooth function of family size and their 95% confidence interval. The y-axis represents the effect of the age term (posterior mean).
Figure 2

Smoothing components for child mortality with A) Number of household members, B) Number of children 5 and under in household, C) Total children ever born, D) Age of respondent at 1st birth, E) Age at first sex, F) Birth order number, G) Age of respondent.

Furthermore, the figure suggests that for a family size of three to five, the risk of child mortality remains relatively constant. However, beginning from above seven up to eleven mortality but then starts to declining beyond twelve. Figure 2B shows an increase with the risk of child mortality as the number of children age five and under increases in the household. Figure 2C demonstrates a steady drop in child mortality with increasing total children ever born. The lowest child morality is observed at total children above nine children. On the other hand, age of respondent at first birth in Figure 2D, illustrates an association with the risk of child mortality in Ethiopia. The figure further suggested that the risk of a child to be dead before age five increases up to age 18 then starts to decrease. Similar to age of respondents at first birth, the risk of a child to be dead before age five increases up to age 20 then starts to decrease (Figure 2E). According to Figure 2F, risk increases from birth order of a child between three to ten. Child mortality risk then decreases slightly as birth order of a child increases. The other significant result was the age of respondents. The result suggests strong significant increasing nonlinear relationship between age of respondents and child mortality in Ethiopia (Figure 2G). In general, the figures suggested nonlinear relationship with child mortality in Ethiopia.

Child mortality risk map

Using socio-economic, demographic and geographic indicator variables only, child mortality risk map for Ethiopia was generated (Figure 3A). The risk map shows that, in general, Tigray, Afar, Somali and Benshangul-Gumuz regions had the highest risk followed by Amhara region. In Oromia region, the risk was lower compared to other regions. Addia Ababa, Dire Dawa and Harari regions showed lower risk which could be due their being better health facilities in these regions. Figure 3B shows a map of standard errors, indicating that the highest errors are found in the SNNP regions followed by Amhara and Oromiya regions, compared to the rest of the country.
Figure 3

Risk map of child mortality A: Predictive risk map of child mortality, B: Standard errors associated with the risk map of child mortality.


We analyzed the data from the 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) in Ethiopia to estimate the changes in risk factors of child mortality in relation to ongoing interventions by the government of Ethiopia. The 2011 EDHS is the follow-up survey to the 2000 and 2005 EDHS surveys. The 2011 survey provided data which could be used to update estimates of basic demographics and health indicators. The data includes information on background characteristics (age, education, media exposure, etc.), birth history and childhood mortality, knowledge and use of family planning methods, fertility preferences, antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care, breastfeeding and infant feeding practices, vaccinations and childhood illnesses, marriage and sexual activity, women’s work and husband’s background characteristics, awareness and behavior regarding AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), adult mortality, including maternal mortality, knowledge of tuberculosis and some geographical variables.

Various researchers have studied the determinants of child mortality in Ethiopia and their findings support the determinants obtained in our study [4,5,32,33]. However, a further statistical analysis is required to identify the factors that determine child mortality. For this reason the structured additive regression models which includes the random effect has been used in this study. A model which allows possible nonlinear relationships between continuous covariates and the response is very important. This model is an adaptation of standard GLMs. In addition to nonlinear structure, taking into consideration the inherent spatial correlation in the data, leads to more accurate estimates of the risk factors of child mortality. Models fitted without taking into account the spatial structure are found to be less adequate when compared with spatial models. Therefore, the results of this study are expected to lead to better estimates of the risk.

The analysis showed that the risk of child mortality increases as the family size approaches to seven and keeps decreasing. But, lower child mortality risk was observed for families with fewer members. Moreover, the highest child mortality was seen in households with more under-five children in the house. Other studies conducted to identify the relationship between child mortality and family size have found that there is clear association between family size and the number of children who have died [34,35]. On the other hand, the relationship between age at first birth and child mortality shows that the risk increases up to age eighteen but starts to fall. Similarly, the relationship between at age first sex shows that the risk of under-five child mortality goes up to age 20 then starts to decrease. These findings from previous studies [32,33] corroborates the results of our study. The risk map produced showed lowest child mortality risk in the Addis Ababa, Dire Dawa and Harari regions compared to the other regions of Ethiopia. The highest risk is observed Tgray, Afar and Amhara regions.

In general, the analysis and risk maps produced in this study indicate that the various risk factors especially geographical ones, such as location of residence (urban or rural) and region remain significant. In addition, other socio-economic factors such as distance to fetch water, source of drinking water, cooking fuel, toilet Facility, floor material, roof material, wall material and smoking have significant effects.

The 2011 EDHS acts as a continuation survey on which subsequent surveys will be built. It is crucial to monitor trends in child mortality risk and to continually explore the complex relationships between child mortality risk and socio-economic, demographic and geographic factors. This will be possible since each round of the EDHS will cover the same locations thus making it possible to monitor under-five child mortality risk over a long period of time. Furthermore, effective control measures of under-five mortality at household level in Ethiopia should start with proper mapping of the risk. This will help to understanding the distribution of under-five mortality so that resources can be prudently allocated to deal with the problem.


Our findings support the notion that childhood mortality is an increasing public health issue in the country with spatial variation across different regions. The results of this study suggested that there are complex social, demographic and geographic processes operating in under-five mortality. This result can be more clearly understood using the appropriate statistical models. Therefore, this study provides an empirical child mortality risk map that can be used for intervention by the government. Identifying areas that are likely to have higher child mortality risks helps to take measures in those areas that require special attention. The results of this study can lead to a better understanding of the spatial distribution of child mortality and together with expert opinion, which is widely used in the absence of empirically produced maps; they can be useful to avoid the risk.

One of the limitations in the present study is that it is not possible to produce risk maps at the lowest administrative units as the DHS data is not sampled by clustering the region/country by the lowest administrative units, called Wereda. The other limitation is the non-exhaustiveness of the factors which might be relevant to child mortality. But, the variables are not included in the DHS. The advantage in the use of DHS data is the issue of data quality. The goodness of the DHS data is the quality. The survey uses complex questionnaires which allows for inconsistent responses to be detected very easily. The novelty of this study is identifying the key risk factors for child mortality in Ethiopia the use of the recently developed Structured Additive Regression Models which provides valid and realistic statistical inferences.

Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) is conducted every five years. For further analysis, the available EDHS surveys could be merged together and the time effect (year of the survey) will be included in the analysis. Therefore, for this study, we propose a general class of structured additive regression model for categorical response, allowing flexible semiparametric predictors, i.e., nonlinear effects of continuous covariates, time trends and interaction between time variable and continuous covariates; and between continuous covariates. This model will be implemented to see the effect of socio-economic, demographic and geographic factors through years. This process will be useful to see the trends of child mortality through years.



We thank, with deep appreciation, ORC macro, Measure DHS for giving us access for the data file. We would like to thank Dr. Solomon Hailu for editing the final manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal


  1. Infant mortality Accessed date: 13 November, 2013
  2. Under-five mortality Accessed date: 13 November, 2013
  3. Adjuik M, Smith T, Clark S, Todd J, Garrib A, Kinfu Y, et al. Cause-specific mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa and Bangladesh. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2006;84(3):181–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Misselhorn M, Harttgen K. A Multilevel Approach to Explain Child Mortality and Undernutrition in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin/ Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics 2006, No. 20.Google Scholar
  5. Ewbank DC, James NG. Effects of Health Programs on Child Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, D.C.: National Academic Press; 1993.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Rutherford ME, Dockerty JD, Jasseh M, Howie SR, Herbison P, Jeffries DJ, et al. Access to health care and mortality of children under 5 years of age in the Gambia: a case–control study. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:216–24. doi:210.2471/BLT.2408.052175.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Binka F, Indome F, Smith T. Impact of spatial distribution of permethrin-impregnated bednets on childhood mortality in rural northern Ghana. Am J Tropical Med Hygiene. 1998;59:80–5.Google Scholar
  8. Armstrong-Schellenberg J, Nathan R, Abdulla S, Mukasa O, Marchant T, Tanner M, et al. Risk factors of child mortality in rural Tanzania 2002;7:506–11. Trop Med Int Health. 2002;7:506.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Becher H, Müller O, Jahn A, Gbangou A, Kynast-Wolf G, Kouyaté B. Risk factors of infant and child mortality in rural Burkina Faso. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(4):265–73.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Kazembe L, Clarke A, Kandala N-B. Childhood mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: cross-sectional insight into small-scale geographical inequalities from Census data. BMJ. Open doi:101136/bmjopen-2012-001421 2012.Google Scholar
  11. Yeshiwondim AK, Gopal S, Hailemariam AT, Dengela DO, HP. P. Spatial analysis of malaria incidence at the village level in areas with unstable transmission in Ethiopia. Int J Health Geogr. 2009; 8:5:doi: 10.1186/1476-1072X-1188-1185.Google Scholar
  12. Asnake M, Henry EG, Tilahun Y, Oliveras E. Addressing Unmet Need for Long Acting Family Planning in Ethiopia: Uptake of Implanon and Characteristics of Users. In.: Research and Evaluation working paper: ; 2012Google Scholar
  13. Ayele W, Tesfaye H, Gebreyes R, Gebreselassie T. Trends and Determinants of Unmet Need for Family Planning and Programme Options, Ethiopia. In. Further Analysis of the 2000, 2005, and 2011 Demographic and Health Surveys, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: ICF International, MoFED and UNICEF; 2013.Google Scholar
  14. CSA. Central Statistics Agency of Ethiopia and ORC Macro: Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2011. Addis Ababa and Calverton, MD: Central Statistics Agency and ORC Macro; 2012.Google Scholar
  15. Deribew A, Tessema F, Girma B. Determinants of under-five mortality in Gilgel Gibe Field Research Center, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2007;21(2):117–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kammann EE, Wand MP. Geoadditive models. J Roy Stat Soc Series C. 2003;52:1–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ruppert D, Wand M, Carroll R. Semiparametric Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahrmeir L, Kneib T, Lang S. Penalized structured additive regression for space-time data: a Bayesian perspective. Statistica Sinica. 2004;14:731–61.Google Scholar
  19. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Linde. Avd. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc. 2002;64:583–639.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gneiting T, Raftery AE. Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J Am Stat Assoc. 2007;102:359–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunn PK, Smyth GK. Randomized quantile residuals. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996;23:236–45.Google Scholar
  22. McCullagh P, Nelder J. Generalized Linear Models. London, England: Chapman & Hall; 1989.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani R. Generalized Additive Models. London: Chapman and Hall; 1990.Google Scholar
  24. Lin X, Zhang D. Inference in generalized additive mixed models by using smoothing splines. J R Stat Soc. 1999;61:381–400.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kandala NB, Ji C, Stallard N, Stranges S, Cappuccio FP. Spatial analysis of risk factors for childhood morbidity in Nigeria. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. 2007;77:770–9.Google Scholar
  26. Kandala NB, Madungu TP, Emina JB, Nzita KP, Cappuccio FP. Malnutrition among children under the age of five in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): does geographic location matter? BMC Public Health. 2011;11:261.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kazembe LN, Mpeketula PMG. Quantifying spatial disparities in neonatal mortality using a structured additive regression model. PLoS One. 2010;5:10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Nkurunziza H, Gebhardt APJ. Bayesian modelling of the effect of climate on malaria in Burundi. Malaria J. 2010;9:114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Nkurunziza H, Gebhardt APJ. Geo-additive modelling of malaria in Burundi. Malaria J. 2011;10:234.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Osei FB, Duker AA, Stein A. Bayesian structured additive regression modeling of epidemic data: application to cholera. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:118.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Wand HWC, Ramjee G. Geoadditive models to assess spatial variation of HIV infections among women in local communities of Durban, South africa. Int J Health Geogr. 2011;10:28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Negera A, Abelti G, Bogale T, Gebreselassie T, Pearson R. An Analysis of the Trends, Differentials and Key Proximate Determinants of Infant and Under-Five Mortality in Ethiopia. ICF International: Calverton, Maryland USA; 2013.Google Scholar
  33. Susuman AS. Child Mortality Rate in Ethiopia. Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(3):9–19.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Black SE, Devereux PJ, Salvanes KG. The More the Merrier? The Effect of Family Size and Birth Order on Children’s Education. Q J Econ. 2005;120(2):669–700.Google Scholar
  35. Gupta MD. Death Clustering, Mothers’ Education and the Determinants of Child Mortality in Rural Punjab, India. Popul Stud. 2010;44:489–505. doi:410.1080/0032472031000144866.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Ayele et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.