Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Public Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Screening for pulmonary tuberculosis in type 2 diabetes elderly: a cross-sectional study in a community hospital

  • Yung-Hsiang Lin3,
  • Chia-Pei Chen3,
  • Pao-Ying Chen3,
  • Jui-Chu Huang3,
  • Cheng Ho3,
  • Hsu-Huei Weng4, 6,
  • Ying-Huang Tsai5, 6 and
  • Yun-Shing Peng3Email author
BMC Public Health201515:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-15-3

Received: 15 May 2014

Accepted: 9 December 2014

Published: 8 January 2015

Abstract

Background

Tuberculosis is one of the major infectious diseases in Taiwan. It has an especially high prevalence in diabetes patients, in whom it is usually asymptomatic and are more likely to result in drug-resistant tuberculosis. The aim of the study was to aggressively screen high risk diabetic elderly, identify the prevalence of tuberculosis and its determinants.

Methods

Type 2 diabetes patients aged over 65 years were enrolled. They received chest X-rays, blood tests and the questionnaires to assess their medical history and symptoms. Suspicious cases were referred to the pulmonary or infectious disease outpatient clinics. Pulmonary tuberculosis was confirmed by sputum culture. Variables between groups were analyzed by Student t test, Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Risk factors were assessed using univariate logistic regression and multiple logistic regression.

Results

A total of 3,087 patients participated this screening program and 7 patients screened positive for pulmonary tuberculosis. Another 5 patients were being under treatment when participating screening program. The prevalence rate was 3.89 per thousand people. The patients with male gender, smoking, liver cirrhosis or subjective body weight loss were associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis significantly. Subjective body weight loss (OR: 6.635 [95% CI: 2.096-21.007]), liver cirrhosis (OR: 10.307 [95% CI: 2.108-50.395]) and history of smoking (OR: 3.981 [95% CI: 1.246-12.718]) are independent risk factors. Among all 73 patients with active tuberculosis or tuberculosis history, they tended to be male, lower body mass index (BMI), more smoking history, more alcohol consumption, more family history of tuberculosis, higher low density lipoprotein (LDL), and less hypertension. However, there was no significant difference in the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels between the tuberculosis group and non-tuberculosis group.

Conclusions

Active screening program is helpful in detecting pulmonary tuberculosis in elderly diabetes patients. Subjective body weight loss, smoking and liver cirrhosis are independent risk factors.

Keywords

Pulmonary tuberculosisDiabetes mellitusRisk factors

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are both the major global health problems. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there were an estimated 8.7 million incident cases of TB and 1.4 million deaths from TB in 2011 [1]. On the other hand, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) reported that more than 371 million people all over the world had DM and 471 billion USD were spent treating diabetes in 2012 [2]. Many risk factors have been associated with TB, such as male gender [1], cigarette smoking [3, 4], alcohol consumption [5], underweight [6], renal disease [7], household contact [8], socioeconomic status [9], and diabetes mellitus [10]. As diabetes patients increased year by year, more and more studies focused on TB prevention in diabetic group in these years [1017].

In Taiwan, a total of 12,220 new tuberculosis cases were recorded in 2012, including 8,546 males and 3,674 females [18]. Among these cases, about 52% were aged over 65 years, with the disease possibly induced from impaired immunity with aging. Furthermore, the ratio of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in Taiwan is decreasing year by year, claiming only about 4% of all incidence tuberculosis in 2010 [19]. Hence, given that they are at high risk for tuberculosis infection, especially pulmonary tuberculosis, it is important for the elderly to be screened. As an aging country composed of more than 11% of the population over 65 years, Taiwan has a high prevalence of diabetes. According to the Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan (NAHSIT) 2004–2008 [20], the prevalence of diabetes in Taiwan was 8.8%, higher than the global data of 8.3% [2]. The prevalence was especially high in old people over 65 years, accounting for 27.7% in males and 24% in females, which further increases the risk of tuberculosis infection.

For tuberculosis prevention, many studies focus on the effects of diabetes on tuberculosis infection. The risk of tuberculosis infection not only rises in diabetes patients, but is also associated with a higher risk of an increased number of diabetes complications [10]. Diabetes patients also require longer treatment and are more likely to develop multi-drug resistant tuberculosis [21]. Additionally, joint management of both diseases appears to improve clinical outcomes [17]. However, most studies to date have employed case control or cohort design. In this study, we focus on the active screening of tuberculosis in elderly diabetes patients and assess other possible risk factors among this group of patients.

Methods

Study population

This single-center, cross-sectional study was supported by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Taiwan and launched at Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH), which has 1,339 beds and 4 endocrinologists. The selection of study area (Chiayi County) is based on the high proportion of people over 65 years. It reached 16.04% among all administrative districts in Taiwan in 2012 [22]. Meetings were held for the doctors of the hospital and the nurses at the local public health centers who were involved in this study to standardize the screening process before the project.

From 2012 September 1st to November 25th, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over the age of 65 years were collected from inpatient and outpatient departments of the hospital and 14 of the 16 Public Health Centers of Chiayi county (the other 2 centers had no mobile screening vehicles). Public health nurses were allocated to the mobile units equipped with X-ray machine to actively screen pulmonary TB in diabetic elders in the communities. The study was approved by Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board (No. 101-2656B). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Data collection

All patients from the hospital and community received screening included a questionnaire, laboratory test, and chest X-ray. The questionnaire was designed to gather basic medical information included age, gender, education, body weight (BW), body height, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, smoking, alcohol drinking, exercise habit, past history, family history of tuberculosis, and diabetes duration. Symptom selection was based on a 7-point screening method [23], suggested by the WHO and Taiwan CDC, including cough for 2 weeks (score = 2), sputum (score = 2), chest pain (score = 1), poor appetite (score = 1), and subjective body weight loss (score = 1); a total score of 5 or more is suggestive of tuberculosis. The reliability of this method was analyzed in all screening-confirmed tuberculosis patients. Laboratory data included serum fasting sugar, lipid profiles, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), renal function, liver function, and urine protein were measured in all patients within 3 months of enrolled date. Chest radiographs within 6 months were also obtained; for hospital cases, they were read by a random radiologist; and for community cases, the X-rays were sent to the Chest Hospital, Department of Health and evaluated by the pulmonologists.

Confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis

If tuberculosis was suspected after the screening, the hospital cases were referred to the pulmonary or infectious disease outpatient clinics of CGMH and community cases were referred to the Chronic Disease Center for further evaluation, diagnosis and treatment. Sputum samples were collected from all suspicious cases, one sample per day for three successive days. The samples were sent for acid fast satin and mycobacterial culture, using BACTEC MGIT 960 system and Löwenstein-Jensen solid media simultaneously [24, 25]. Sputum acid fast stain positive was defined as screening positive and sputum culture with Mycobacteria tuberculosis were confirmed cases.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics are expressed as mean ± SD. All of the continuous variables were detected when the variables followed normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Homogeneity of variance was tested with the Levene’s test. Student’s t-test applied to evaluate differences in mean values of normally distributed data. Categorical variables were tested using the Chi-square (χ2) test or Fisher’s exact test. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed in order to identify potential risk factors associated with pulmonary TB. To control for potential confounders, a multiple logistic regression model with forward selection was used. The entry probability was p = 0.1 or less and the removal probability was p> 0.2. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and the significance level was set at p = 0.05 or less. Model fit was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test. Data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Demographic characteristics

A total of 3,087 (2,141 hospital and 946 community) type 2 diabetes patients over 65 years participated this screening program. The participants without any missing information were 2,979 individuals. The average age of the participants was 74.15 ± 5.90 years old and 62.9% of them were either overweight (BMI 24–27 kg/m2) or obese (BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2), according to definitions by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare [26]. About half of the patients had diabetes for longer than 10 years and the average level of HbA1c was 7.47 ± 1.44% (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics (n = 3087)

Variables

Mean ± SD

n (%)

General data

  

 Age (year)

74.15 ± 5.90

 

 Gender

  

  Male

 

1483 (48)

  Female

 

1604 (52)

 BMI (kg/m2)

  

  <24

 

1146 (37.1)

  24-27

 

1046 (33.9)

  ≥27

 

894 (29.0)

  missing

 

1 (0)

DM status

  

  DM duration

  

  ≥10 years

 

1573 (51.0)

  <10 years

 

1481 (48.0)

  missing

 

33 (1.1)

 Fasting sugar (mg/dL)

146.18 ± 51.79

 

 HbA1c (%)

7.47 ± 1.44

 

 HDL (mg/dL)

45.37 ± 12.14

 

 LDL (mg/dL)

96.84 ± 29.23

 

 TG (mg/dL)

137.17 ± 89.56

 

 Creatinine (mg/dL)

1.49 ± 1.56

 

 ALT (U/L)

29.47 ± 29.20

 

Data are n (%) unless indicated.

Abbreviation: BMI: body mass index; DM: diabetes mellitus; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; TG: triglyceride, ALT: alanine aminotransferase.

Eleven cases were screening positive (acid fast stain positive) and 7 of them were confirmed with pulmonary tuberculosis (4 non-tuberculosis mycobacteria). Another 5 patients were being under anti-tuberculosis treatment when participating screening program. The TB prevalence rate was 3.89‰ (12/3,087). We defined the cases of screening-confirmed TB and under treatment TB as new TB group (active TB). Another 61 patients had pulmonary tuberculosis history and 2 cases were accidentally confirmed lung cancers.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for determinants of active pulmonary TB

The difference of clinical characteristics between new TB cases and not-new TB cases are shown in Table 2. Male gender and a history of smoking are statistically significant risk factors of TB infection. Liver cirrhosis was also found to have a higher prevalence in the new TB group.
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of the new TB group and control group

 

New TB

Control

p value

OR (95% CI)

(n = 12)

(n = 3075)

General data

  

0.583

1.026 (0.935-1.126)

 Age (year)

75.08 ± 3.99

74.14 ± 5.91

 Gender

  

0.029*

5.438 (1.19-24.859)

  Male

10 (83.3)

1473 (47.9)

  Female

2 (16.7)

1602 (52.1)

 BMI (kg/m2)

23.81 ± 5.53

25.44 ± 3.86

0.140

0.882 (0.747-1.042)

 Smoking

  

0.009**

4.601 (1.456-14.541)

  Yes

7 (58.3)

702 (22.8)

  No

5 (41.7)

2307 (75.0)

 Alcohol consumption

  

0.274

2.077 (0.560-7.703)

  Yes

3 (25.0)

416 (13.5)

  No

9 (75.0)

2592 (84.3)

DM status

  

0.179

1.006 (0.997-1.014)

 Fasting glucose (mg/dL)

166.35 ± 73.91

146.08 ± 51.67

 HbA1c (%)

7.71 ± 1.56

7.46 ± 1.44

0.573

1.112 (0.769-1.608)

 HDL (mg/dL)

41.00 ± 10.08

45.38 ± 12.15

0.378

0.966 (0.895-1.043)

 LDL (mg/dL)

87.40 ± 20.23

96.86 ± 29.25

0.469

0.988 (0.956-1.021)

 Triglyceride (mg/dL)

186.00 ± 143.61

137.02 ± 88.36

0.162

1.002 (0.999-1.006)

 Creatinine (mg/dL)

1.39 ± 0.51

1.49 ± 1.56

0.824

0.951 (0.609-1.485)

 ALT (U/L)

27.57 ± 12.84

29.48 ± 29.24

0.862

0.997 (0.965-1.030)

 DM duration (year)

13.00 ± 9.18

10.61 ± 7.58

0.278

1.037 (0.971-1.106)

Comorbidities

    

 Liver cirrhosis

  

0.004**

9.710 (2.084-45.24)

  Yes

2 (16.7)

62 (2.0)

  No

10 (83.3)

3010 (97.8)

 Hypertension

  

0.310

0.555 (0.179-1.726)

  Yes

6 (50.0)

1975 (64.2)

  No

6 (50.0)

1097 (35.7)

Symptoms (Score)

    

 Total score ≥ 5

  

0.765

1.368 (0.176-10.654)

  Yes

1 (8.3)

185 (6.0)

  No

11 (91.7)

2784 (90.5)

 Cough ≥ 2 wks (score =2)

  

0.146

0.218 (0.028-1.694)

  Yes

1 (8.3)

872 (28.4)

  No

11 (91.7)

2095 (68.1)

 Sputum (score =2)

  

0.500

1.513 (0.454-5.039)

  Yes

4 (33.3)

737 (24.0)

  No

8 (66.7)

2230 (72.5)

 Chest pain (score =1)

  

0.994

0.992 (0.128-7.718)

  Yes

1 (8.3)

249 (8.1)

  No

11 (91.7)

2718 (88.4)

 Anorexia (score =1)

  

0.639

1.439 (0.314-6.595)

  Yes

2 (16.7)

362 (11.8)

  No

10 (83.3)

2605 (84.7)

 BW loss (score =1)

  

0.001**

6.997 (2.245-21.809)

 Yes

6 (50.0)

371 (12.1)

 No

6 (50.0)

2596 (84.4)

Data are n (%) unless indicated.

Abbreviation: BMI: body mass index; DM: diabetes mellitus; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; ALT: alanine aminotransferase.

New TB group: screening confirmed TB + under treatment TB.

Control group = all participants except new TB.

*p <0.05, **p < 0.01.

A summary of the 7-point symptom screening of all cases is also listed in Table 2. No difference was found for the total score and the ratio of scores above 5 points between the new TB and the not-new TB groups. There was also no statistically significant difference in all symptoms except subjective body weight loss (50% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.001).

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for independent determinants of active pulmonary TB

In multivariate analysis, we included male gender, smoking, liver cirrhosis and body weight loss. Male gender, smoking and liver cirrhosis were the factors that reached statistic significant in univariate analysis in Table 2. The reason why we included body weight loss is that underweight has been shown to be independently associated with tuberculosis [6]. The Hosmer and Lemeshow test indicates a χ2 of 0.512 (p = 0.474), suggesting that the data fit the final model quite well. After adjustment, subjective BW loss (OR: 6.635 [95% CI: 2.096-21.007]), smoking (OR: 3.981 [95% CI: 1.246-12.718]), and liver cirrhosis (OR: 10.307 [95% CI: 2.108-50.395]) remained strongly associated with pulmonary tuberculosis (Table 3).
Table 3

Multiple logistic regression model determining independent risk factors for pulmonary tuberculosis among 3,087 diabetes patients

Significant variables

Adjust OR

95% CI

p value

Smoking

3.981

1.246-12.718

0.020*

BW loss

6.635

2.096-21.007

0.001**

Liver cirrhosis

10.307

2.108-50.395

0.004**

Abbreviation: BW: body weight.

*p <0.05, **p < 0.01.

The characteristics of all TB group vs. non TB group

To more clearly view the possible risk factors for TB infection, the characteristics of all TB cases (include new TB and TB history cases) and non-TB cases are shown in Table 4. More risk factors achieving statistical significance included male gender, lower BMI, smoking, alcohol drinking, and TB family history. The diabetes control status between the two groups was not significantly different, except for TB patients having a higher low-density lipoprotein (LDL). The prevalence of liver cirrhosis was insignificant in all TB groups. However, hypertension was less frequent in all patients with tuberculosis infection (41% vs. 64.7%, p< 0.001).
Table 4

Clinical characteristics of the all TB group vs non TB group

 

All TB

Non TB

p value

OR (95% CI)

(n = 73)

(n = 3014)

General data

    

 Age (year)

75.15 ± 5.68

74.12 ± 5.91

0.142

1.029 (0.991-1.069)

 Gender

  

<0.001***

3.663 (2.119-6.333))

  Male

56 (76.7)

1427 (47.3)

  Female

17 (23.3)

1587 (52.7)

 BMI (kg/m2)

24.37 ± 3.94

25.46 ± 3.87

0.017*

0.923 (0.864-0.986)

 Smoking

  

<0.001***

2.533 (1.576-4.070)

  Yes

31 (42.5)

678 (22.5)

  No

41 (56.2)

2271 (75.3)

 Alcohol consumption

  

0.001**

2.410 (1.425-4.074)

  Yes

20 (27.4)

399 (13.2)

  No

53 (72.6)

2548 (84.5)

 TB family history

  

<0.001***

5.908 (2.437-14.324)

  Yes

6 (8.2)

45 (1.5)

  No

67 (91.8)

2969 (98.5)

DM status

    

 Fasting glucose (mg/dL)

147.15 ± 58.64

146.15 ± 51.62

0.881

1.000 (0.996-1.005)

 HbA1c (%)

7.57 ± 1.61

7.46 ± 1.43

0.541

1.050 (0.899-1.226)

 HDL (mg/dL)

41.99 ± 11.79

45.44 ± 12.14

0.062

0.974 (0.948-1.001)

 LDL (mg/dL)

107.64 ± 35.20

96.60 ± 29.05

0.006*

1.012 (1.003-1.020)

 Triglyceride (mg/dL)

138.98 ± 75.20

137.13 ± 89.86

0.886

1.000 (0.997-1.003)

 Creatinine (mg/dL)

1.64 ± 1.80

1.49 ± 1.56

0.446

1.054 (0.921-1.206)

 ALT (U/L)

27.20 ± 17.82

29.52 ± 29.39

0.615

0.996 (0.982-1.011)

 DM duration (year)

10.16 ± 7.37

10.63 ± 7.59

0.606

0.992 (0.960-1.024)

Comorbidities

    

 Liver cirrhosis

  

0.668

 

  Yes

2 (2.7)

62 (2.1)

1.340 (0.321-5.585)

  No

71 (97.3)

2949 (97.8)

 Hypertension

  

<0.001***

0.425 (0.266-0.679)

  Yes

32 (43.8)

1949 (64.7)

  No

41 (56.2)

1062 (35.2)

Data are n (%) unless indicated.

Abbreviation: BMI: body mass index; DM: diabetes mellitus; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; ALT: alanine aminotransferase.

All TB group: New TB group + patients with TB history.

Non TB group: all participants except all TB group.

*p <0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Discussion

Although diabetes as an important risk factor of tuberculosis infection is well documented [1013], most of the relevant literature is retrospective. A systemic review in 2010 included only 12 studies about active screening for TB in diabetic patients and some of them used non-specific methods (such as chest X-ray) to diagnose TB [15]. However, screening rate increased with the prevalence of TB in the study region and with the severity of diabetes. One pilot large scale intensive screening project, reported in China [14], enrolled 15,342 diabetes patients over 14 years of age in 5 medical centers without documented HbA1c. Only symptom screening positive patients went on for further studies for TB. From September 2011 to March 2012, the TB notification rate rose from 0.31-1.11‰ (each medical center) to 3.52-7.74‰ (average of 5 centers for each quarter). In a similar symptom screening project in a tertiary care hospital in south India, 38 of 7,083 diabetic patient already had TB and 12 of 125 underwent TB investigation were newly diagnosed TB. The incidence rate increases with HbA1c level and diabetes duration, especially in patients with HbA1c over 9.0% and with diabetes duration over 10 years [16]. Another symptom screening research in Mexico detected 38 TB cases in 7,763 diabetes patients and 11 of them were unaware of their TB [17]. These studies pointed out that active screening and better glucose control might be important in TB prevention.

In Taiwan, there were 12,220 TB notifications in 2012 and 6,328 (52%) of them were over 65 years of age [18]. The prevalence of TB in the general population and in the elderly over 65 years was 0.52‰ and 2.43‰ respectively. In our main study area of Chiayi County, the data was similar, 0.62‰ and 2.54‰, indicating an increased risk of TB infection in the elderly. Similarly, Baker MA et al. reported that diabetes and treated diabetes patients had an increased risk for TB (Hazard Ratio: 3.60 & 4.37, respectively) [10]. According to our findings, the prevalence rate of TB (3.89‰) was further increased 6- to 7-fold in advanced aged diabetes patients, suggesting the worth of wide-spread screening.

Two comorbidities reached statistical significance in our study: higher liver cirrhosis prevalence in the new TB group and lower hypertension prevalence rate in all TB groups. Based on previous research in Taiwan, liver cirrhosis was not found to be a risk factor of pulmonary TB with pulmonary infection [27], but this finding may be due to an insufficient number of active TB cases. Further subgroup studies on the etiologies of liver cirrhosis are also needed to clarify the relation between liver cirrhosis and active tuberculosis in diabetic older patients. Furthermore, BMI was documented to have a positive relationship with blood pressure [28], and being overweight was also associated with high risk of hypertension and cardiovascular events [29]; for these reasons, the lower BMI in all TB groups likely resulted in a lower hypertension prevalence rate. Other risk factors, such as male gender, lower BMI, smoking, alcohol drinking, and TB family history are comparable with previous findings [1, 36, 8, 16].

Accumulating literatures have described the difference in lipid profiles between TB and health controls, showing lower levels of total cholesterol, LDL, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level in TB cases [30, 31]. Some authors speculated that it might be the result of increased lipid metabolism during inflammatory or infection status for immune response [32]. In our study, however, the levels of LDL and HDL tended to be lower in the new TB group without statistical significance. The reasons for this discrepancy are not clear and may be attributed to the insufficient numbers of TB cases and different patient population in this study.

Based on a survey of symptoms in 313 adult tuberculosis patients, the percentage of cough ≥ 2 weeks, chest pain, anorexia, and body weight loss was reported as only 48.2%, 41.0%, 40.6%, and 44.5%, respectively [33]. In the elderly, one meta-analysis review reported no differences between old and young TB patients with respect to cough, sputum production, weight loss, and fatigue, but older patients had a lower prevalence of fever, sweating, and hemoptysis [34]. In this study, we found that neither a symptom score of greater than 5 points nor any symptom could clearly distinguish TB cases, with the exception of subjective body weight loss. Similarly, the weakness of symptom screening was also demonstrated in a Vietnam study [35]. In fact, we showed that subjective body weight loss is an independent factor associated with pulmonary TB. In this regard, underweight has been shown to be an independent factor associated with tuberculosis [6]. Taken together, elderly diabetic patients with complaints of body weight loss should prompt active TB screening in practice.

This study has several limitations. The first limitation is about the short duration. In an observational study in the U.S., TB was observed to be a seasonal disease, with a peak in spring and trough in late fall [36]. Our study period that covered September to November, the results may thus underestimate of the effect of intensive screening due to relatively lower incidence rate. Secondly, we examined acid fast stain and mycobacterial culture only in suspicious cases. It is likely that we underestimated the occurrence of pulmonary TB in this population. This underestimation may constitute an under-reporting bias and negatively impact the accuracy of the risk factors for TB in this analysis. Further studies are needed to clarify this issue.

Conclusion

Subjective body weight loss, smoking and liver cirrhosis are independent factors associated with pulmonary tuberculosis in elderly diabetic patients. In these subgroups of patients, active surveillance should be prompted to identify patients who are in need of treatment. Considering the potential benefit of joint management of TB and DM, further investigations are needed to study the impact of active screening program on the treatment outcomes in elderly diabetic patients with TB.

Abbreviations

ALT: 

Alanine aminotransferase

BMI: 

Body mass index

BW: 

Body weight

CDC: 

Centers for Disease Control

CGMH: 

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

DM: 

Diabetes mellitus

HbA1c: 

Glycated hemoglobin

HDL: 

High-density lipoprotein

IDF: 

International Diabetes Federation

LDL: 

Low-density lipoprotein

NAHSIT: 

Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan

TB: 

Tuberculosis

TG: 

Triglyceride

WHO: 

World Health Organization.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by the Centers for Disease Control in Taiwan (PMRPG6B0041).

We thank Chia-Hao Chang, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, for assisting data analysis and interpretation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
(2)
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
(3)
Division of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
(4)
Chang Gung University, College of Medicine

References

  1. Global tuberculosis report 2013 http://www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/91355/1/9789241564656_eng.pdf
  2. Diabetes and Impaired glucose tolerance, global burden http://www.diabetesatlas.org/content/diabetes-and-impaired-glucosetolerance
  3. Bates MN, Khalakdina A, Pai M, Chang L, Lessa F, Smith KR: Risk of tuberculosis from exposure to tobacco smoke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Intern Med 2007, 167:335–342. 10.1001/archinte.167.4.335View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lin HH, Ezzati M, Chang HY, Murray M: Association between tobacco smoking and active tuberculosis in Taiwan: prospective cohort study.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009, 180:475–480. 10.1164/rccm.200904-0549OCView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lönnroth K, Williams BG, Stadlin S, Jaramillo E, Dye C: Alcohol use as a risk factor for tuberculosis - a systematic review.BMC Public Health 2008, 8:289. 10.1186/1471-2458-8-289View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Lönnroth K, Williams BG, Cegielski P, Dye C: A consistent log-linear relationship between tuberculosis incidence and body mass index.Int J Epidemiol 2010, 39:149–155. 10.1093/ije/dyp308View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hussein MM, Mooij JM, Roujouleh H: Tuberculosis and chronic renal disease.Semin Dial 2003, 16:38–44. 10.1046/j.1525-139X.2003.03010.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Becerra MC, Appleton SC, Franke MF, Chalco K, Arteaga F, Bayona J, Murray M, Atwood SS, Mitnick CD: Tuberculosis burden in households of patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study.Lancet 2011, 377:147–152. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61972-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantwell MF, McKenna MT, McCray E, Onorato IM: Tuberculosis and race/ethnicity in the United States: impact of socioeconomic status.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 157:1016–1020. 10.1164/ajrccm.157.4.9704036View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Baker MA, Lin HH, Chang HY, Murray MB: The risk of tuberculosis disease among persons with diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.Clin Infect Dis 2012, 54:818–825. 10.1093/cid/cir939View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dooley KE, Chaisson RE: Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus: convergence of two epidemics.Lancet Infect Dis 2011, 9:737–746.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeon CY, Murray MB: Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of active tuberculosis: a systematic review of 13 observational studies.PLoS Med 2008, 5:e152. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050152View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Stevenson CR, Critchley JA, Forouhi NG, Roglic G, Williams BG, Dye C, Unwin NC: Diabetes and the risk of tuberculosis: a neglected threat to public health.Chronic Illn 2007, 3:228–245. 10.1177/1742395307081502View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin Y, Li L, Mi F, Du J, Dong Y, Li Z, Qi W, Zhao X, Cui Y, Hou F, Zachariah R, Kapur A, Lönnroth K, Harries AD: Screening patients with Diabetes Mellitus for Tuberculosisin China.Trop Med Int Health 2012, 17:1302–1308. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03069.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeon CY, Harries AD, Baker MA, Hart JE, Kapur A, Lönnroth K, Ottmani SE, Goonesekera S, Murray MB: Bi-directional screening for tuberculosis and diabetes: a systematic review.Trop Med Int Health 2010, 11:1300–1314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumpatla S, Sekar A, Achanta S, Sharath BN, Kumar AMV, Harries AD, Viswanathan V: Characteristics of patients with diabetes screened for tuberculosis in a tertiary care hospital in South India.Public Health Action 2013, 3:23–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Castellanos-Joya M, Delgado-Sánchez G, Ferreyra-Reyes L, Cruz-Hervert P, Ferreira-Guerrero E, Ortiz-Solís G, Jiménez MI, Salazar LL, Montero-Campos R, Mongua-Rodríguez N, Baez-Saldaña R, Bobadilla-del-Valle M, González-Roldán JF, Ponce-de-León A, Sifuentes-Osornio J, García-García L: Results of the implementation of a pilot model for the bidirectional screening and joint management of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus in Mexico.PLoS One 2014, 9:e106961. 10.1371/journal.pone.0106961View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Notifiable Infectious Diseases Statistics System http://nidss.cdc.gov.tw/singledisease.aspx?pt=s&dc=1&dt=3&disease=010
  19. Taiwan Tuberculosis Control Report 2012 http://www.cdc.gov.tw/uploads/files/201303/9ea28ba2–69c7–4f27-af3b-55be5ec7e35c.pdf
  20. Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan 2004–2008 https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/search/scidown/4749
  21. Chang JT, Dou HY, Yen CL, Wu YH, Huang RM, Lin HJ, Su IJ, Shieh CC: Effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on the clinical severity and treatment outcome in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: a potential role in the emergence of multidrug-resistance.J Formos Med Assoc 2011, 110:372–381. 10.1016/S0929-6646(11)60055-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Statistical Yearbook of Interior: Population by Age http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/y02–01.xls
  23. Bone A, Aerts A, Grzemska M, Kimerling M, Kluge H, Levy M, Portaels F, Raviglione M, Varaine F: Tuberculosis Control in Prisons.http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2000/WHO_CDS_TB_2000.281.pdf
  24. Hanna BA, Ebrahimzadeh A, Elliott LB, Morgan MA, Novak SM, Rusch-Gerdes S, Acio M, Dunbar DF, Holmes TM, Rexer CH, Savthyakumar C, Vannier AM: Use of BACTEC MGIT 960 for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens: multicenter study.J Clin Microbiol 1999, 37:3578–3582.Google Scholar
  25. Lee JJ, Suo J, Lin CB, Wang JD, Lin TY, Tsai YC: Comparative evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system with solid medium for isolation of mycobacteria.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003, 6:569–74.Google Scholar
  26. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare http://www.mohw.gov.tw/EN/Ministry/Index.aspx
  27. Wu HP, Pan YH, Hua CC, Shieh WB, Jiang BY, Yu TJ: Pneumoconiosis and liver cirrhosis are not risk factors for tuberculosis in patients with pulmonary infection.Respirology 2007, 12:416–419. 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01033.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tu W, Eckert GJ, DiMeglio LA, Yu Z, Jung J, Pratt JH: Intensified Effect of Adiposity on Blood Pressure in Overweight and Obese Children.Hypertension 2011, 58:818–824. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.175695View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Sullivan L, Parise H, Kannel WB: Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: the Framingham experience.Arch Intern Med 2002, 162:1867–1872. 10.1001/archinte.162.16.1867View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Deniz O, Gumus S, Yaman H, Ciftci F, Ors F, Cakir E, Tozkoparan E, Bilgic H, Ekiz K: Serum total cholesterol, HDL-C and LDL-C concentrations significantly correlate with the radiological extent of disease and the degree of smear positivity in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.Clin Biochem 2007, 40:162–166. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2006.10.015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sahin F, Yıldız P: Distinctive biochemical changes in pulmonary tuberculosis and pneumonia.Arch Med Sci 2013, 9:656–661.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Pérez-Guzmán C, Vargas MH, Quiñonez F, Bazavilvazo N, Aguilar A: A cholesterol-rich diet accelerates bacteriologic sterilization in pulmonary tuberculosis.Chest 2005, 127:643–651. 10.1378/chest.127.2.643View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller LG, Asch SM, Yu EI, Knowles L, Gelberg L, Davidson P: A population- based survey of tuberculosis symptoms: how atypical are atypical presentations?Clin Infect Dis 2000, 30:293–299. 10.1086/313651View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pérez-Guzmán C, Vargas MH, Torres-Cruz A, Villarreal-Velarde H: Does aging modify pulmonary tuberculosis?: A meta-analytical review.Chest 1999, 116:961–967. 10.1378/chest.116.4.961View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoa NB, Cobelens FG, Sy DN, Nhung NV, Borgdorff MW, Tiemersma EW: Yield of interview screening and chest X-ray abnormalities in a tuberculosis prevalence survey.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2012, 16:762–767.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Willis MD, Winston CA, Heilig CM, Cain KP, Walter ND, Mac Kenzie WR: Seasonality of tuberculosis in the United States, 1993–2008.Clin Infect Dis 2012, 54:1553–1560. 10.1093/cid/cis235View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/15/3/prepub

Copyright

© Lin et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement