Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Stability and change in alcohol habits of different socio-demographic subgroups - a cohort study

  • 1Email author,
  • 1, 2,
  • 3 and
  • 1
BMC Public Health201414:525

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-525

  • Received: 25 February 2014
  • Accepted: 23 May 2014
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Stability in alcohol habits varies over time and in subgroups, but there are few longitudinal studies assessing stability in alcohol habits by socio-demographic subgroups and potential predictors of stability and change. The aim was to study stability and change in alcohol habits by sex, age, and socio-economic position (SEP).

Methods

Data derived from two longitudinal population based studies in Sweden; the PART study comprising 19 457 individuals aged 20-64 years in 1998-2000, and the Stockholm Public Health Cohort (SPHC) with 50 067 individuals aged 18-84 years in 2002. Both cohorts were followed-up twice; PART 2000-2003 and 2010, and SPHC 2007 and 2010. Alcohol habits were measured with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), and with normal weekly alcohol consumption (NWAC). Stability in alcohol habits was measured with intraclass correlation. Odds ratios were estimated in multinomial logistic regression analysis to predict stability in alcohol habits.

Results

For the two drinking measures there were no consistent patterns of stability in alcohol habits by sex or educational level. The stability was higher for older age groups and self-employed women. To be a man aged 30-39 at baseline predicted both increase and decrease in alcohol habits.

Conclusions

The findings illustrate higher stability in alcohol habits with increasing age and among self-employed women with risky alcohol habits. To be a man and the age 30-39 predicted change in alcohol habits. No conclusive pattern of socio-economic position as predictor of change in alcohol habits was found and other studies of potential predictors seem warranted.

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • Social epidemiology
  • Socio-economic position
  • Cohort studies
  • Public health

Background

Stability in alcohol habits seems to vary over time and in different subgroups [1]. A typical drinking pattern in many high income countries includes a debut in teenage with increasing consumption until early adulthood, followed by gradually decreasing consumption [13]. Teenagers and young adults also tend to have higher levels of episodic drinking compared to adults with a more continuous consumption [4]. Furthermore, men drink more than women [3] and socio-economic subgroups are complexly associated with alcohol habits and alcohol-related problems and mortality [57]. In Sweden alcohol habits are heterogeneous; men drink more than women and the consumption decreases with age, but both of these differences tend to abate [8, 9].

Longitudinal studies of alcohol consumption generally find age related changes [1, 4, 10] often with decreasing consumption or transition to nondrinking with age. Fillmore et al. [11] and Johnstone et al. [2] studied the patterning of change in drinking behaviour across the life course with combined multiple longitudinal data sets. They found an overall modest contribution of gender to variability in pattern of change in drinking, and higher age predicted more stable pattern of drinking. Kerr et al. [12] found lower stability in alcohol consumption for longer follow-ups and in younger samples in three longitudinal population surveys from the United States.

However, the variation in alcohol habits is diverse and although many studies have emphasised declines in alcohol consumption with increasing age more recent cohorts in the United States shows a tendency towards more stable consumption with increasing age [1]. This is supported by a study of men aged 42-60 years in Finland [13], where the weekly alcohol consumption increased in the age group of 42-year olds and remained stable among the older cohorts, and in a longitudinal study of women aged 43 in 1998 in Sweden [14], showing high stability in alcohol consumption with increasing age.

Gender and education have been found to predict changes in alcohol habits, where women are more likely to decrease or quit drinking than men in all ages. Moore et al. [1] found male gender and lower educational level to predict decline in alcohol consumption in the US, which may not be generalizable to e.g. Sweden. They also found that male gender, higher educational level and being employed predicted increased consumption. Molander et al. [4] found gender and education to predict changes in drinking across various drinking measures in Wisconsin. However, research indicate that the declines in drinking with age are more consistent in North America and Europe than elsewhere, and that women’s risky drinking may be associated with lower levels of education in high income countries but with higher levels of education in low-income countries [15, 16].

In order to target interventions, it is necessary to have knowledge, not only about changes in alcohol habits in different subgroups, but also which groups that tend to keep their drinking habits stable over time [2, 17]. With regard to the theory on collectivity of drinking cultures, we expect our findings to show fairly equal stability of alcohol habits in different socio-demographic subgroups over time [18].

While several studies have described the change of alcohol habits based on the level of alcohol consumption in subgroups, the literature on longitudinal stability in alcohol habits in socio-economic subgroups is sparse [19]. There are few studies assessing how these predictors may influence stability or change in alcohol habits. This paper studies two measures of alcohol habits to give a broader picture of stability in alcohol habits in the studied population. Against this background, the aim was to study stability and change in alcohol habits by sex, age and SEP, measured by educational level and occupational class. Two research questions were formulated: 1) How does stability in alcohol habits differ in subgroups of sex, age and SEP? 2) Do sex, age and SEP predict stability and change in alcohol habits?

Method

Study population

In this study, data from two longitudinal population-based postal survey studies, from the County of Stockholm, capital of Sweden during 1998-2010, were studied; the PART study and the Stockholm Public Health Cohort (SPHC). The Ethical Committee at Karolinska Institutet granted ethical approval for the PART study, and the Stockholm regional ethical review board granted ethical approval for the use of SPHC data.

The PART study

The first data set derives from the longitudinal study in 1998 to 2010 of mental health, work, and relations (Swedish: Psykisk hälsa, Arbete och RelaTioner; PART), in Stockholm County, Sweden. The sample frame included 19 457 randomly selected Swedish citizens residing in Stockholm County during the baseline (T0) period 1998-2000, aged 20-64 years. At T0 a total of 10 341 individuals responded to the questionnaire, a response rate of 53% [20]. At the first follow-up (T1) in 2001-2003, the 10 203 still available participants from the baseline were invited to complete a similar questionnaire, and 8 518 individuals (83%) participated [21]. At the second follow-up (T2) in 2010, 5 227 (63%) individuals participated.

The Stockholm Public Health Cohort

The second data set is from a prospective study, the Stockholm Public Health Cohort (SPHC) from the Stockholm County Council public health surveys. In 2002 (T0), the sample frame consisted of 50 067 individuals, aged 18-84 years, representing a random sample of the population in the Stockholm County. A total of 31 182 individuals (62%) responded to the questionnaire at baseline (T0). In 2007, at the first follow-up (T1), 23 794 (76%) subjects participated. At the second follow-up (T2), conducted in 2010, 19 327 (80%) subjects participated [22, 23].

Measurements

The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)

In PART the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was used to measure alcohol habits with focus on the past 12 months at T0, T1 and T2. AUDIT consists of ten questions, scoring 0-40 points, and was carried out in a self-reported questionnaire. The total AUDIT score reflects the individual’s level of risk related to alcohol (current consumption, dependence symptoms, and current or earlier alcohol-related consequences). A low score indicates low consumption and few alcohol-related consequences, while a high score indicates high consumption and more severe consequences [24]. AUDIT is sensitive to both alcohol problems and hazardous drinking and is therefore suitable for studies in the general population where the prevalence of alcohol problems is lower than in clinical samples. To detect hazardous consumption the cut-off points in AUDIT were set at 8 points for men and 6 points for women [25].

Normal weekly alcohol consumption (NWAC)

In SPHC, alcohol habits were measured by self-reported typical weekly alcohol consumption during the last year with normal weekly alcohol consumption (NWAC) [26] at T0 and T2. Alcohol consumption was measured with centilitres at T0 and number of glasses at T2 per different beverages: strong cider/alcopop, medium-strong beer, strong beer, wine, strong wine and spirits. The NWAC was calculated into grams of 100% alcohol per week. Risk consumption per normal week was defined as drinking 14 or more standard glasses (in Sweden defined as 12 grams 100% alcohol) of alcohol for men and 9 or more for women [27], i.e. 108 grams for women and 168 grams for men.

It is worth to emphasise that AUDIT and NWAC includes different aspects of alcohol habits. Both measures include current alcohol consumption during the last year, but AUDIT additionally covers current and earlier alcohol related problems, with focus on the last year. Because of this, the stability in the two measures is expected to differ and consistent findings for the two measures of stability and predictors of stability and change in alcohol habits seem more profound. The two measures of alcohol habits were therefore studied for the subgroup variables stated below.

Socio-demographic variables

Age and sex were extracted from registers for both PART and SPHC. In PART the age at baseline, 20-64 years, was categorized into five subgroups. In SPHC the age at baseline, 18-84 years, was divided into seven age groups.

Socio-economic position (SEP), defined as the social and economic factors that influence a group’s position within a society, may affect health behaviour, and in this case alcohol habits [28, 29]. Indicators of SEP were educational level, that has been found to affect the stability in alcohol habits in other contexts as mentioned above, and also occupational class, an often used indicator of SEP in Sweden [30] that could explain different alcohol habits in a Swedish population based on occupation. To measure educational level, self-reported data from the questionnaire in PART and register data from Statistics Sweden linked to the samples in SPHC were used. Educational level was defined as the highest level of completed education at the time of the measurement, self-reported or available in register data when sending out the questionnaire. Educational level was divided into three groups: Low = Primary School or less, Intermediate = Secondary School/Gymnasium and High = Post-secondary/University.

Information on occupational class was obtained from the questionnaires, asking for current or previous occupation (not depending on or confuse with current employment) and categorized according to the Swedish socio-economic classification (SEI) [30] into six groups: Unskilled workers, Skilled workers, Lower non-manual employees, Intermediate non-manual employees, Higher non-manual employees and Self-employed. Persons with no identifiable or reached occupation, including students, conscripts, sickness and disability pensioners, was coded as missing, according to SEI.

Missing data

Non-participation analyses were made after the first two waves (T0 and T1) of the PART study using data from official registers. Lower participation rates were associated with being male, younger age, low income, low education, non-Nordic origin, being unmarried and having previous psychiatric diagnoses [20, 21]. The mean AUDIT score at T0 differed significantly between responders (4.56) and non-responders (5.07) at T1 (p <0.001). This significant difference was also found between responders and non-responders from T1 to T2.

In SPHC non-responders were also more likely to be men, of young age, born outside of Sweden, unmarried, have low income and low educational level [22]. The mean NWAC at T0 differed significantly between responders (99.46 grams) and non-responders (93.81 grams) at T2, (p <0.01). When divided in age groups, the non-responders in the age 18-29 had higher weekly alcohol consumption than the responders, but for older ages the responders drank more than non-responders.

Statistical analysis

Data from PART and SPHC were analysed and presented separately and then studied in order to find possible consistent subgroup differences in stability of alcohol habits and predictors of change in alcohol habits. The two drinking measures were treated as continuous variables. To estimate stability in alcohol habits, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), with two-way mixed effects model and 95% confidence interval (CI) [31, 32] were calculated for the AUDIT score at T0, T1 and T2 in PART, and NWAC at T0 and T2 in SPHC. ICC presents the proportion of variance explained by individual scores, where values closer to 1 are more consistent over time. Over shorter periods of time, the ICC is often used and interpreted as an indication of reliability [33]. With two or more measurement points, or when time between observations increases, the ICC can be used to estimate the stability over time [32].

The ICCs and CI were calculated and interpreted within each subgroup variable to assess the degree of stability. The group wise stability for the two cohorts, the mean AUDIT score and mean NWAC at T0, and the relative change in mean from T0 to T2, expressed in percentage, were calculated for the subgroups.

Multinomial logistic regression analyses were carried out to estimate crude and adjusted ORs with 95% CIs in order to examine if sex, age and SEP predicted stable, decreased or increased alcohol habits. Since there was no comparable information on alcohol consumption at first follow-up in SPHC, only the change between baseline (T0) and second follow-up (T2) was studied and compared in both PART and SPHC. The dependent variable of change in alcohol habits between (T0) and (T2) was defined as stable (-0.49 to 0.49 SD: reference group), increased (>0.5 SD) or decreased (≤ -0.5 SD) in AUDIT score and NWAC. Independent variables included in the regression analysis were sex, age, educational level and occupational class at baseline. The statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS Statistics version 20.0.

Results

Participants

The participants responding at T0, T1 and T2, 5 227 individuals in PART and 19 327 individuals in SPHC, were included in the study. The baseline distribution of SEP and alcohol use by sex in the two samples is described in Table 1. The mean and standard deviation for alcohol habits are presented by sex and age in Table 2. The mean AUDIT scores and mean NWAC did not change substantially over time for the two cohorts. Participants with information on the studied variables in the analyses were available for 4 277 participants (82%) in PART and 16 688 participants (86%) in SPHC.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics for the PART study (1998-2000) and the Stockholm Public Health Cohort (2002)

Variables*

Level

Subgroups

PART N = 5 227

SPHC N = 19 327

 

n

%

n

%

Educational level

Men

Low

260

12.3

1 356

16.4

  

Intermediate

886

42.0

3 378

40.7

  

High

960

45.5

3 217

38.8

  

Missing

2

0.1

339

4.1

 

Women

Low

455

14.6

1 664

15.1

  

Intermediate

1 139

36.5

4 440

40.2

  

High

1 520

48.7

4 455

40.4

  

Missing

5

0.2

478

4.3

Occupational class

Men

Unskilled workers

200

9.5

1 487

17.9

  

Skilled workers

169

8.0

829

10.0

  

Lower non-manual employees

193

9.2

763

9.2

  

Intermediate non-manual employees

443

21.0

1 907

23.0

  

Higher non-manual employees

682

32.4

2 068

24.9

  

Self-employed

185

8.8

852

10.3

  

Missing

236

11.2

384

4.6

 

Women

Unskilled workers

321

10.3

1 781

16.1

  

Skilled workers

127

4.1

1 007

9.1

  

Lower non-manual employees

586

18.8

2 127

19.3

  

Intermediate non-manual employees

792

25.4

3 045

27.6

  

Higher non-manual employees

686

22.0

2 055

18.6

  

Self-employed

127

4.1

465

4.2

  

Missing

480

15.4

557

5.0

Abstainers last 12 months

Men

76

3.6

515

6.2

  

Missing

4

0.2

62

0.7

  

Women

170

5.5

1 168

10.6

  

Missing

4

0.1

130

1.2

Risk consumers

Men

421

20.0

2 279

27.5

  

Missing

23

1.1

270

3.3

  

Women

501

16.1

2 703

24.5

  

Missing

59

1.9

318

2.9

*Variables: Educational level is defined as highest finished education, from the questionnaires in PART and from Statistics Sweden registers, in SPHC. Occupational class is current or previous occupation, self-reported in the questionnaires, and categorized according to Swedish socio-economic classification (29). Abstainers last 12 months are from a dichotomous question in the questionnaires. A risk consumer is defined as men with 8+ points in AUDIT score and women with 6+ points in AUDIT score in PART and defined as drinking 14 or more standard glasses (> = 168 grams 100% alcohol) for men and 9 standard glasses (> = 108 grams 100% alcohol) for women per week in SPHC.

Table 2

Alcohol habits presented for the PART study and the Stockholm Public Health Cohort (SPHC)

Alcohol habits*

Level

Subgroups

T0

T1

T2

  

n

%

Mean

SD

n

%

Mean

SD

n

%

Mean

SD

PART

N = 5 227

             

AUDIT score

Valid cases

 

5 145

98.4

4.4

3.6

5 173

99.0

4.3

3.5

5 087

97.3

4.2

3.5

 

Men

Age 20-29 at T0

335

15.9

7.3

4.6

334

15.8

6.8

4.1

335

15.9

5.5

4.0

  

Age 30-39 at T0

431

20.4

5.7

4.3

428

20.3

5.4

3.8

426

20.2

5.5

4.1

  

Age 40-49 at T0

445

21.1

5.2

4.0

447

21.2

5.3

3.9

434

20.6

5.2

4.2

  

Age 50-59 at T0

662

31.4

5.0

4.1

664

31.5

4.8

3.8

651

30.9

4.9

4.0

  

Age 60-64 at T0

212

10.1

4.2

3.6

214

10.2

4.2

3.6

206

9.8

4.0

3.4

 

Missing

Age 20-64 at T 0

23

1.1

NA**

NA

21

1.0

NA

NA

56

2.7

NA

NA

 

Women

Age 20-29 at T0

571

18.3

4.6

3.2

581

18.6

4.3

3.2

571

18.3

3.5

2.7

  

Age 30-39 at T0

698

22.4

3.5

2.9

701

22.5

3.6

2.9

696

22.3

3.7

3.1

  

Age 40-49 at T0

697

22.3

3.6

3.0

703

22.5

3.7

3.0

689

22.1

3.7

3.0

  

Age 50-59 at T0

803

25.7

3.4

2.8

811

26.0

3.4

2.8

799

25.6

3.4

2.8

  

Age 60-64 at T0

291

9.3

2.8

2.0

290

9.3

2.8

2.1

280

9.0

3.0

2.8

 

Missing

Age 20-64 at T 0

59

1.9

NA

NA

33

1.1

NA

NA

84

2.7

NA

NA

SPHC

N = 19 327

             

Normal week consumption

Valid cases

 

18 739

97.0

99.5

99.3

NA

NA

NA

NA

18 601

96.2

99.8

103.2

Men

Age 18-29 at T0

925

11.2

145.8

138.6

    

922

11.1

121.3

119.7

  

Age 30-39 at T0

1 415

17.1

125.6

107.6

    

1 404

16.9

120.9

110.2

  

Age 40-49 at T0

1 503

18.1

134.8

124.0

    

1 492

18.0

141.8

134.1

  

Age 50-59 at T0

1 948

23.5

142.2

124.8

    

1 942

23.4

149.7

132.2

  

Age 60-64 at T0

930

11.2

128.6

116.9

    

920

11.1

139.7

126.4

  

Age 65-74 at T0

982

11.8

115.5

105.4

    

966

11.7

118.4

116.2

  

Age 75-84 at T0

317

3.8

85.6

87.5

    

306

3.7

82.9

83.4

 

Missing

Age 18-84 at T 0

270

3.3

NA

NA

    

338

4.1

NA

NA

 

Women

Age 18-29 at T0

1 491

13.5

83.9

87.5

    

1 476

13.4

62.5

64.4

  

Age 30-39 at T0

2 252

20.4

71.0

67.1

    

2 226

20.2

69.8

66.1

  

Age 40-49 at T0

2 028

18.4

81.4

74.0

    

2 034

18.4

83.9

77.4

  

Age 50-59 at T0

2 451

22.2

82.1

69.1

    

2 436

22.1

88.7

80.6

  

Age 60-64 at T0

926

8.4

76.2

69.5

    

920

8.3

84.0

86.5

  

Age 65-74 at T0

1 105

10.0

62.7

65.0

    

1 090

9.9

65.3

75.3

  

Age 75-84 at T0

466

4.2

43.5

52.5

    

467

4.2

46.0

67.5

 

Missing

Age 18-84 at T 0

318

2.9

NA

NA

    

388

3.5

NA

NA

*Alcohol habits in PART are calculated AUDIT score, 0-40 points, with mean and standard deviation. Alcohol habits in SPHC is the normal weekly alcohol consumption (NWAC) in the questionnaires and given in grams of 100% alcohol per week, with mean and standard deviation calculated from consumed volume of strong cider/alcopop, medium-strong beer, strong beer, wine, strong wine and spirits. **NA = Not available in the data.

Stability in alcohol habits

The stability in AUDIT 1998 to 2010 for the total cohort was ICC = 0.69. For both men and women the stability in AUDIT was higher in older age groups. The subgroups with highest stability were men aged 60-64 at baseline (ICC = 0.81) within the age groups, men that were intermediate non-manual employees (ICC = 0.75) and women that were skilled workers (ICC = 0.78) within the occupational classes. Most of the SEP groups showed moderate stability, but men that were unskilled workers (ICC = 0.55) had low stability. Also, women aged 20-29 years at baseline (ICC = 0.59) showed low stability in alcohol habits. Men with high educational level had higher stability in alcohol habits compared to men with low and intermediate educational levels but for women there was no difference in stability due to educational level. For more details, see Table 3.
Table 3

Stability and change in AUDIT score in the PART study at T 0 , T 1 and T 2

Subgroups

N

ICC*

95% CI

Mean audit AT T0

Change (%) mean audit

 

T0- T2

Total

4 277

0.69

0.68-0.70

4.38

-3.28

Sex

     
 

Men

1 782

0.68

0.66-0.70

5.38

-4.36

Women

2 495

0.66

0.65-0.68

3.66

-2.15

Age at T 0

     

Men

20-29 years

240

0.62

0.56-0.68

7.25

-22.59

 

30-39 years

389

0.62

0.57-0.67

5.58

-3.00

 

40-49 years

404

0.66

0.62-0.70

5.08

1.90

 

50-59 years

598

0.72

0.68-0.75

4.95

1.18

 

60-64 years

151

0.81

0.76-0.85

4.37

-5.15

Women

20-29 years

429

0.59

0.54-0.64

4.65

-23.25

 

30-39 years

573

0.65

0.61-0.69

3.61

3.19

 

40-49 years

618

0.68

0.65-0.72

3.54

4.85

 

50-59 years

700

0.72

0.69-0.75

3.42

2.05

 

60-64 years

175

0.70

0.63-0.76

2.79

9.63

Educational level at T 0

     

Men

Low

215

0.61

0.54-0.68

5.45

-5.97

 

Intermediate

728

0.65

0.62-0.69

5.57

-8.14

 

High

839

0.73

0.70-0.75

5.19

-0.41

Women

Low

334

0.70

0.65-0.74

3.24

0.92

 

Intermediate

882

0.64

0.60-0.67

3.79

-2.54

 

High

1 279

0.67

0.65-0.70

3.68

-2.57

Occupational class at T 0

     

Men

Unskilled workers

187

0.55

0.47-0.63

5.64

-12.61

 

Skilled workers

159

0.67

0.60-0.74

6.04

-15.31

 

Lower non-manual employees

181

0.62

0.54-0.69

5.62

-6.09

 

Intermediate non-manual employees

424

0.75

0.71-0.78

4.97

-0.95

 

Higher non-manual employees

656

0.71

0.68-0.74

5.20

-0.62

 

Self-employed

175

0.71

0.64-0.77

5.87

-3.41

Women

Unskilled workers

298

0.69

0.64-0.73

3.65

-4.96

 

Skilled workers

117

0.78

0.72-0.84

3.49

-0.49

 

Lower non-manual employees

564

0.62

0.58-0.66

3.66

-1.94

 

Intermediate non-manual employees

746

0.66

0.62-0.69

3.69

-2.54

 

Higher non-manual employees

649

0.68

0.64-0.71

3.64

-1.61

 

Self-employed

121

0.60

0.51-0.69

3.75

1.76

*Intraclass correlation (ICC) with two-way mixed effects model where people effects are random and measures effects are fixed.

The total stability in NWAC 2002 to 2010 was ICC = 0.62. Men aged 18-39 showed lower stability in alcohol habits compared to older ages. Women aged 18-29 had the lowest stability (ICC = 0.40) and most probable to change (decrease) their alcohol habits, the stability was higher with age and the age 60-64 was highest (ICC = 0.67), compared to the other ages. The stability in NWAC had no straightforward trend by age, although the older age groups had slightly higher stability than the younger. The age group 50-59 years had lower stability than the surrounding age groups for both men and women. There was no difference in alcohol habits for men due to educational level, but women with low educational level had less stable alcohol habits (ICC = 0.51) than higher educated women. For men all occupational classes had low or moderate stability in alcohol habits, except for higher non-manual employees that had higher stability in alcohol habits (ICC = 0.64). For women all occupational classes had low stability, except for self-employed women who had high stability (ICC = 0.68) combined with the highest mean NWAC at baseline. Self-employed men also had the highest mean NWAC at baseline, but were more prone to change their alcohol habits. For more details, see Table 4.
Table 4

Stability and change in normal weekly alcohol consumption (NWAC) in SPHC at T 0 and T 2

Subgroups

n

ICC*

95% CI

Mean

Chance (%)

 

Nwac

Mean nwac

 

AT T0

T0- T2

Total

16 688

0.62

0.61-0.63

101.51

0.74

Sex

     
 

Men

7 128

0.60

0.58-0.61

133.32

1.31

Women

9 560

0.57

0.56-0.59

77.79

0.00

Age at T 0

     

Men

18-29 years

728

0.47

0.41-0.52

149.48

-19.60

 

30-39 years

1 339

0.53

0.49-0.57

126.39

-4.53

 

40-49 years

1 400

0.66

0.63-0.69

136.28

4.96

 

50-59 years

1 820

0.61

0.58-0.64

142.71

6.85

 

60-64 years

865

0.64

0.60-0.68

128.94

8.36

 

65-74 years

892

0.62

0.58-0.66

116.74

3.71

 

75-84 years

84

0.69

0.56-0.79

71.80

17.02

Women

18-29 years

1 210

0.40

0.35-0.44

85.09

-26.42

 

30-39 years

2 111

0.56

0.53-0.59

71.48

-0.94

 

40-49 years

1 931

0.62

0.59-0.65

82.17

3.64

 

50-59 years

2 328

0.59

0.56-0.61

83.16

7.54

 

60-64 years

868

0.67

0.64-0.71

78.23

7.82

 

65-74 years

984

0.62

0.58-0.65

65.56

3.81

 

75-84 years

128

0.68

0.57-0.76

40.33

9.05

Educational level at T 0

     

Men

Low

1 103

0.58

0.54-0.62

124.37

4.55

 

Intermediate

3 042

0.59

0.57-0.61

137.09

2.06

 

High

2 983

0.62

0.59-0.64

132.77

-0.59

Women

Low

1 337

0.51

0.47-0.55

70.74

-3.67

 

Intermediate

4 061

0.58

0.56-0.60

76.42

1.43

 

High

4 162

0.59

0.57-0.61

81.40

-0.29

Occupational class at T 0

     

Men

Unskilled workers

1 303

0.59

0.56-0.63

121.12

3.07

 

Skilled workers

720

0.54

0.49-0.59

122.79

4.43

 

Lower non-manual employees

685

0.60

0.55-0.65

133.56

-4.08

 

Intermediate non-manual employees

1 737

0.59

0.56-0.62

136.61

-2.54

 

Higher non-manual employees

1 903

0.64

0.61-0.67

136.04

1.22

 

Self-employed

780

0.58

0.53-0.62

149.20

8.87

Women

Unskilled workers

1 526

0.54

0.51-0.58

62.98

-1.35

 

Skilled workers

917

0.53

0.49-0.58

71.21

-1.67

 

Lower non-manual employees

1 895

0.57

0.54-0.60

77.23

2.00

 

Intermediate non-manual employees

2 856

0.56

0.53-0.58

78.43

-0.81

 

Higher non-manual employees

1 933

0.58

0.55-0.61

88.51

-0.19

 

Self-employed

433

0.68

0.63-0.73

94.36

3.93

*Intraclass correlation (ICC) with two-way mixed effects model where people effects are random and measures effects are fixed.

Predictors of stability and change in alcohol habits

To be a man and age 20-39 years at baseline, predicted decrease in AUDIT score between T0 and T2 in PART. To be a man and age 30-39 at baseline, predicted increase in AUDIT score between T0 and T2, see Table 5. Neither educational level nor occupational class predicted changes in alcohol habits including alcohol-related problems.
Table 5

Multinomial logistic regressions of stability in alcohol habits in the PART study (T 0 and T 2 )

Variable

Stable*

Decrease**

Increase***

 

n

Row

n

Row

ORcrude A

ORadj B

n

Row

ORcrude A

ORadj B

  

%

 

%

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

 

%

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

Total n = 4 277

3 336

78.0

515

12.0

-

-

426

10.0

-

-

Sex

          

Men

1 293

72.6

266

14.9

1.69

1.88

223

12.5

1.74

1.83

     

(1.40-2.03)

(1.54-2.29)

  

(1.42-2.13)

(1.49-2.26)

Women

2 043

81.9

249

10.0

1

1

203

8.1

1

1

Age at T 0

          

20-29 years

420

62.8

193

28.8

5.04

5.63

56

8.4

1.35

1.48

     

(3.23-7.85)

(3.56-8.92)

  

(0.83-2.20)

(0.90-2.43)

30-39 years

739

76.8

104

10.8

1.54

1.66

119

12.4

1.63

1.75

     

(0.98-2.44)

(1.04-2.64)

  

(1.05-2.54)

(1.12-2.74)

40-49 years

824

80.6

87

8.5

1.16

1.24

111

10.9

1.37

1.46

     

(0.73-1.84)

(0.78-1.99)

  

(0.88-2.13)

(0.93-2.28)

50-59 years

1 079

83.1

106

8.2

1.08

1.09

113

8.7

1.06

1.07

     

(0.68-1.70)

(0.69-1.72)

  

(0.68-1.65)

(0.69-1.67)

60-64 years

274

84.0

25

7.7

1

1

27

8.3

1

1

Educational level at T 0

          

Low

435

79.2

56

10.2

0.94

1.21

58

10.6

1.08

1.09

     

(0.69-1.28)

(0.85-1.72)

  

(0.79-1.47)

(0.77-1.55)

Intermediate

1 221

75.8

229

14.2

1.37

1.07

160

9.9

1.06

0.91

     

(1.13-1.67)

(0.85-1.35)

  

(0.85-1.32)

(0.71-1.16)

High

1 680

79.3

230

10.9

1

1

208

9.8

1

1

Occupational class at T 0

          

Unskilled workers

356

73.4

72

14.8

1.49

1.06

57

11.8

1.31

1.34

     

(1.09-2.03)

(0.75-1.51)

  

(0.94-1.83)

(0.93-1.95)

Skilled workers

199

72.1

47

17.0

1.74

1.28

30

10.9

1.23

1.19

     

(1.21-2.50)

(0.85-1.91)

  

(0.80-1.88)

(0.76-1.87)

Lower non-manual employees

583

78.3

90

12.1

1.14

1.07

72

9.7

1.01

1.21

     

(0.86-1.51)

(0.77-1.48)

  

(0.74-1.37)

(0.86-1.70)

Intermediate non-manual employees

933

79.7

128

10.9

1.01

0.95

109

9.3

0.95

1.03

     

(0.78-1.30)

(0.73-1.24)

  

(0.73-1.25)

(0.78-1.36)

Higher non-manual employees

1 037

79.5

141

10.8

1

1

127

9.7

1

1

Self-employed

228

77.0

37

12.5

1.19

1.20

31

10.5

1.11

1.07

     

(0.81-1.76)

(0.79-1.80)

  

(0.73-1.69)

(0.70-1.65)

*Stable alcohol habits, reference group, with -0.49 to 0.49 SD = - 2 to 2 AUDIT scores from T0 to T2.

**Decreased alcohol habits with (< -0.5 SD) = < - 3 AUDIT scores or lower from T0 to T2.

***Increased alcohol habits with > 0.5 SD = > 3 AUDIT scores or more from T0 to T2.

A:Crude OR for each separate variable.

B:OR for each variable, adjusted for all variables in the model.

Furthermore, to be a man, ages 18-59 and 65-74 years at baseline, low educational level, and self-employment predicted decrease in NWAC between T0 and T2 in SPHC. Unskilled workers were less likely to decrease than to be stable. To be a man, aged 30-39, and 50-59 years, having low and intermediate education level and being self-employed, predicted an increase in NWAC, see Table 6.
Table 6

Multinomial logistic regressions of stability in normal weekly alcohol consumption in SPHC (T 0 and T 2 )

Variable

Stable*

Decrease**

Increase***

 

n

Row

n

Row

ORcrude A

ORadj B

n

Row

ORcrude A

ORadj B

  

%

 

%

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

 

%

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

Total n = 16 688

10 451

62.6

3 052

18.3

  

3 185

19.1

-

 

Sex

          

Men

3 813

53.5

1 603

22.5

1.93

2.02

1 712

24.0

2.02

2.00

     

(1.78-2.09)

(1.85-2.19)

  

(1.87-2.19)

(1.84-2.17)

Women

6 638

69.4

1 449

15.2

1

1

1 473

15.4

1

1

Age at T 0

          

18-29 years

1 004

51.8

623

32.1

4.37

4.79

311

16.0

1.37

1.47

     

(2.77-6.91)

(3.02-7.60)

  

(0.93-2.02)

(0.99-2.18)

30-39 years

2 109

61.1

681

19.7

2.28

2.42

660

19.1

1.39

1.48

     

(1.44-3.59)

(1.53-3.83)

  

(0.95-2.02)

(1.01-2.16)

40-49 years

2 174

65.3

534

16.0

1.73

1.76

623

18.7

1.27

1.29

     

(1.10-2.73)

(1.11-2.80)

  

(0.87-1.85)

(0.88-1.90)

50-59 years

2 627

63.3

635

15.3

1.70

1.69

886

21.4

1.49

1.48

     

(1.08-2.68)

(1.07-2.67)

  

(1.03-2.17)

(1.02-2.17)

60-64 years

1 156

66.7

242

14.0

1.48

1.37

335

19.3

1.28

1.20

     

(0.92-2.35)

(0.86-2.20)

  

(0.87-1.89)

(0.81-1.77)

65-74 years

1 226

65.4

315

16.8

1.81

1.71

335

17.9

1.21

1.15

     

(1.14-2.88)

(1.08-2.73)

  

(0.82-1.78)

(0.78-1.70)

75-84 years

155

73.1

22

10.4

1

1

35

16.5

1

1

Educational level at T 0

          

Low

1 464

60.0

484

19.8

1.17

1.31

492

20.2

1.22

1.26

     

(1.04-1.32)

(1.13-1.50)

  

(1.08-1.37)

(1.10-1.45)

Intermediate

4 402

62.0

1 272

17.9

1.02

1.06

1 429

20.1

1.18

1.18

     

(0.94-1.12)

(0.96-1.17)

  

(1.08-1.28)

(1.07-1.30)

High

4 585

64.2

1 296

18.1

1

1

1 264

17.7

1

1

Occupational class at T 0

          

Unskilled workers

1 772

62.6

499

17.6

0.97

0.80

558

19.7

1.04

0.95

     

(0.85-1.10)

(0.69-0.93)

  

(0.92-1.18)

(0.82-1.09)

Skilled workers

1 008

61.6

305

18.6

1.04

0.95

324

19.8

1.06

0.99

     

(0.89-1.21)

(0.80-1.13)

  

(0.92-1.24)

(0.84-1.16)

Lower non-manual

1 671

64.8

444

17.2

0.91

0.97

465

18.0

0.92

1.00

employees

    

(0.80-1.04)

(0.84-1.13)

  

(0.81-1.05)

(0.86-1.15)

Intermediate non-manual employees

2 945

64.1

845

18.4

0.98

1.03

803

17.5

0.90

0.95

     

(0.88-1.10)

(0.92-1.16)

  

(0.81-1.01)

(0.85-1.07)

Higher non-manual

648

53.4

257

21.2

1

1

308

25.4

1

1

employees

          

Self-employed

2 407

62.7

702

18.3

1.36

1.27

727

19.0

1.57

1.34

     

(1.15-1.61)

(1.07-1.51)

  

(1.34-1.85)

(1.14-1.58)

*Stable normal weekly alcohol consumption, reference group, with -0.49 to 0.49 SD = - 43.99 to 43.99 grams of 100% alcohol per week from T0 to T2.

**Decreased normal weekly alcohol consumption with 0.5 SD = < - 44 grams of 100% alcohol per week or more from T0 to T2.

***Increased normal weekly alcohol consumption with > 0.5 SD = > 44 grams of 100% alcohol per week or more from T0 to T2.

A: Crude OR for each separate variable.

B: OR for each variable, adjusted for all variables in the model.

Discussion

The present study used data from two cohorts from the same geographical area and approximately the same time period, and two different drinking measures to study stability and change in alcohol habits. Alcohol habits, including alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems, were more stable in general over time compared to the measure of alcohol consumption only. From the somewhat scattered results, we found four patterns of stability in alcohol habits consistent for both drinking measures;

  •  There were no major differences in stability between men and women

  •  The stability tended to be higher in older age groups

  •  No conclusive pattern of stability was found with regard to educational level or occupational class, except for tendencies of high stability in alcohol habits and risky alcohol habits among self-employed women

  •  To be a man, and the age 30-39 predicted changes, both increase and decrease, in alcohol habits

The findings show an overall modest contribution of sex to variability in pattern of change in drinking, and increasing age predicted more stable pattern of drinking, in line with earlier findings [2, 11]. However, Molander et al. [4] found education to predict drinking changes across different drinking measures, which was not found consistently in our study. Socio-economic position did not predict change in alcohol habits for the measurement of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems but low educational level and self-employment predicted change in the measurement of alcohol consumption. Thus, studies of other potential predictors of change in alcohol habits including alcohol-related problems seem warranted.

In Sweden, where the welfare system is considered to be strong and gender equity high, the association between heavy drinking and social stratification has been found to be less pronounced in earlier studies [34]. In a study by Grittner et al. [35] the data on Sweden did not find any significant differences for men and women in educational level and the risk of alcohol-related problems. Our data show that the gender gap in alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems is narrowing, with a slightly increase for women and decrease for men, which is supported in earlier cross-sectional studies both in Sweden and other countries [9, 36]. The effects of sex, age, and socio-economic position are not simple and linear, stability and change in both alcohol consumption and related problems and dependence varies with more complex combinations of these variables.

While the theory on the collectivity of drinking cultures [18] would lead us to expect small differences in stability between subgroups, we found it possible to identify some subgroups that are more stable or prone to change their alcohol habits. Relative changes in the mean can explain the subgroup stability partly, see Tables 3 and 4. Self-employed women had the highest mean measure at baseline within occupational class and were the only occupational class showing increase over time. This was seen for both measures, although the ICC was lower and with wider CI in the PART study, which could be due to the low sample. However, this indicates that this group could be at risk of later alcohol-related problems and maybe more vulnerable to this, having less social security as self-employed. Another interesting finding is that the alcohol habits gets more stable with age at a higher level for both men and women. Due to the findings, different targeted interventions could be formed for the groups mentioned above with stable risky alcohol habits or those with risky alcohol habits that are prone to change in order to prevent alcohol-related consequences in the future. Interesting to notice is that the unskilled and skilled (only men) workers, with low stability in both samples, decreased the mean AUDIT score quite substantially between T0 and T2, which could be due to attained socio-economic position at the follow-up.

The main strengths of this study are the large population-based samples, deriving from the same demographic area and covering the same time period, and the longitudinal design. Furthermore, alcohol habits are measured with two different drinking measures, giving a broader picture of stability in alcohol habits in the studied population. While several studies have examined changes in alcohol consumption for different subgroups by level of consumption [1, 12, 13, 37], or used the intraclass correlation to study reliability of self-reported age of onset of alcohol use [33, 38], ICC is relatively seldom employed to study stability and change in alcohol habits. This study uses ICC to estimate stability in alcohol habits, since ICC is sensitive to both shifts in mean and subjects rank order over time.

Some limitations in this study should be noted, first, the non-participation at baseline. In line with other population studies e.g. [9], both PART and SPHC had high non-participation rates at baseline. Based on non-participation analysis from the two samples, there were relatively small differences between participants and non-participants. Although the non-participants at follow-up had slightly lower consumption in total and more hazardous habits than the participants at baseline, we cannot draw conclusions on their stability in alcohol habits. Second, the number of occasions and the time period differed somewhat for the two cohorts, although the studied subgroup variables were the same in the two cohorts. This may affect possible consistency between the results. Due to these differences and that alcohol habits were measured with two different drinking measures, we compared patterns, rather than levels, in ICC between the two samples. Variation in estimates of stability and change between the two cohorts might be associated with the interval between measurements, the percentage of subjects retained across measurements and the frame and characteristics of the alcohol measures. The analysis was also performed when stratifying by risk consumers, consumers and abstainers at baseline, but the same pattern or no pattern due to low sample were found, strengthening our conclusions. There might also be an overlap in participation in both cohorts since they were made separately, but if so probably a very small overlap. No information is available regarding this.

Third, as this study focused on long-term stability it did not embrace oscillations between the surveys. It is likely that the consistency of alcohol habits at two or three points of time might not fully reflect individual stability. Moreover, other unmeasured factors associated with stability in alcohol habits may better predict and explain stability and change in alcohol for subgroups.

The results add to the knowledge of long-term stability in alcohol habits for different socio-demographic subgroups and how the studied factors predict stability and change in alcohol habits. Based on the findings, we suggest targeted public health efforts to prevent future alcohol-related consequences in foremost self-employed women, men born in 1960-1970 and elderly men and women.

Conclusions

The findings illustrate higher stability of alcohol habits with increasing age and among self-employed women with risky alcohol habits. To be a man and the age 30-39 predicted change, both decrease and increase, in alcohol habits. No conclusive pattern of socio-economic position as predictors of change in alcohol habits was found and other potential predictors of change in alcohol habits seem warranted.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants who answered the questionnaires. Thanks to Henrik Dal for support in SPSS and Emilie Agardh for valuable comments on the manuscript. An abstract was presented at The World Congress of Epidemiology 7-11th August 2011 in Edinburgh, Scotland.

Funding

This study was supported by funds from Forskningsrådet för arbetsliv och socialvetenskap (Swedish Council for Working life and Social Research) [2008-0098 and 2009-1644].

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska Huset, floor 8, Tomtebodav. 18 A, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
(2)
Stockholm University, SoRAD, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
(3)
Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Public Health Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska Huset, floor 10, Tomtebodav, 18 A, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

References

  1. Moore AA, Gould R, Reuben DB, Greendale GA, Carter MK, Zhou K, Karlamangla A: Longitudinal patterns and predictors of alcohol consumption in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2005, 95 (3): 458-465. 10.2105/AJPH.2003.019471.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Johnstone BM, Leino EV, Ager CR, Ferrer H, Fillmore KM: Determinants of life-course variation in the frequency of alcohol consumption: meta-analysis of studies from the collaborative alcohol-related longitudinal project. J Stud Alcohol. 1996, 57 (5): 494-506.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wilsnack RW, Vogeltanz ND, Wilsnack SC, Harris TR, Ahlstrom S, Bondy S, Csemy L, Ferrence R, Ferris J, Fleming J, Graham K, Greenfield T, Guyon L, Haavio-Mannila E, Kellner F, Knibbe R, Kubicka L, Loukomskaia M, Mustonen H, Nadeau L, Narusk A, Neve R, Rahav G, Spak F, Teichman M, Trocki K, Webster I, Weiss S: Gender differences in alcohol consumption and adverse drinking consequences: cross-cultural patterns. Addiction. 2000, 95 (2): 251-265. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95225112.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Molander RC, Yonker JA, Krahn DD: Age-related changes in drinking patterns from mid- to older age: results from the wisconsin longitudinal study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010, 34 (7): 1182-1192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloomfield K, Grittner U, Kramer S, Gmel G: Social inequalities in alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems in the study countries of the EU concerted action ‘Gender, Culture and Alcohol Problems: a Multi-national Study’. Alcohol Alcohol Suppl. 2006, 41 (1): i26-i36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Harrison L, Gardiner E: Do the rich really die young? Alcohol-related mortality and social class in Great Britain, 1988-94. Addiction. 1999, 94 (12): 1871-1880. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9412187112.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hemmingsson T, Lundberg I, Romelsjo A, Alfredsson L: Alcoholism in social classes and occupations in Sweden. Int J Epidemiol. 1997, 26 (3): 584-591. 10.1093/ije/26.3.584.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Branstrom R, Andreasson S: Regional differences in alcohol consumption, alcohol addiction and drug use among Swedish adults. Scand J Public Health. 2008, 36 (5): 493-503. 10.1177/1403494807087557.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kallmen H, Wennberg P, Leifman H, Bergman H, Berman AH: Alcohol habits in Sweden during 1997-2009 with particular focus on 2005 and 2009, assessed with the AUDIT: a repeated cross-sectional study. Eur Addict Res. 2011, 17 (2): 90-96. 10.1159/000322068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Karlamangla A, Zhou K, Reuben D, Greendale G, Moore A: Longitudinal trajectories of heavy drinking in adults in the United States of America. Addiction. 2006, 101 (1): 91-99. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01299.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fillmore KM, Hartka E, Johnstone BM, Leino EV, Motoyoshi M, Temple MT: A meta-analysis of life course variation in drinking. Br J Addict. 1991, 86 (10): 1221-1267. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01702.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kerr WC, Fillmore KM, Bostrom A: Stability of alcohol consumption over time: evidence from three longitudinal surveys from the United States. J Stud Alcohol. 2002, 63 (3): 325-333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ilomaki J, Korhonen MJ, Lavikainen P, Lipton R, Enlund H, Kauhanen J: Changes in alcohol consumption and drinking patterns during 11 years of follow-up among ageing men: the FinDrink study. Eur J Public Health. 2010, 20 (2): 133-138. 10.1093/eurpub/ckp079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Benzies KM, Wangby M, Bergman LR: Stability and change in health-related behaviors of midlife Swedish women. Health Care Women Int. 2008, 29 (10): 997-1018. 10.1080/07399330802269675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilsnack RW, Wilsnack SC, Kristjanson AF, Vogeltanz-Holm ND, Gmel G: Gender and alcohol consumption: patterns from the multinational GENACIS project. Addiction. 2009, 104 (9): 1487-1500. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02696.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Grittner U, Kuntsche S, Gmel G, Bloomfield K: Alcohol consumption and social inequality at the individual and country levels–results from an international study. Eur J Public Health. 2013, 23 (2): 332-339. 10.1093/eurpub/cks044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Skog OJ, Duckert F: The development of alcoholics’ and heavy drinkers’ consumption: a longitudinal study. J Stud Alcohol. 1993, 54 (2): 178-188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Skog OJ: The collectivity of drinking cultures: a theory of the distribution of alcohol consumption. Br J Addict. 1985, 80 (1): 83-99. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1985.tb05294.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rehm J, Room R, Graham K, Monteiro M, Gmel G, Sempos CT: The relationship of average volume of alcohol consumption and patterns of drinking to burden of disease: an overview. Addiction. 2003, 98 (9): 1209-1228. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00467.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lundberg I, Damstrom Thakker K, Hallstrom T, Forsell Y: Determinants of non-participation, and the effects of non-participation on potential cause-effect relationships, in the PART study on mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005, 40 (6): 475-483. 10.1007/s00127-005-0911-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bergman P, Ahlberg G, Forsell Y, Lundberg I: Non-participation in the second wave of the PART study on mental disorder and its effects on risk estimates. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2010, 56 (2): 119-132. 10.1177/0020764008098838.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Svensson AC, Magnusson C, Fredlund P: Hälsoenkät 2010 - teknisk rapport [Health survey 2010- technical report]. 2011, Stockholm: Karolinska Institutets folkhälsoakademiGoogle Scholar
  23. Svensson AC, Fredlund P, Laflamme L, Hallqvist J, Alfredsson L, Ekbom A, Feychting M, Forsberg B, Pedersen NL, Vagero D, Magnusson C: Cohort Profile: The Stockholm Public Health Cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2013, 42 (5): 1263-1272. 10.1093/ije/dys126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Babor TH-BJC, Aaunders JB, Monteiro MG: Audit. The alcohol disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for use in primary care. 2001, Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO), SecondGoogle Scholar
  25. Bergman H, Kallmen H: Alcohol use among Swedes and a psychometric evaluation of the alcohol use disorders identification test. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002, 37 (3): 245-251. 10.1093/alcalc/37.3.245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Romelsjo A, Leifman H, Nystrom S: A comparative study of two methods for the measurement of alcohol consumption in the general population. Int J Epidemiol. 1995, 24 (5): 929-936. 10.1093/ije/24.5.929.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Engdahl B, Nilsen P: Receiving an alcohol enquiry from a physician in routine health care in Sweden: a population-based study of gender differences and predictors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011, 8 (5): 1296-1307.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G: Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006, 60 (1): 7-12. 10.1136/jech.2004.023531.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G: Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006, 60 (2): 95-101. 10.1136/jech.2004.028092.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Statistics Sweden: Socioekonomisk Indelning (SEI) [Swedish socio-Economic Classification]. Reports on statistical co-ordination. 1983, Stockholm: Statistics SwedenGoogle Scholar
  31. Bartko JJ: The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966, 19 (1): 3-11. 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Muller R, Buttner P: A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med. 1994, 13 (23–24): 2465-2476.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson TP, Mott JA: The reliability of self-reported age of onset of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use. Addiction. 2001, 96 (8): 1187-1198. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.968118711.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuntsche S, Gmel G, Knibbe RA, Kuendig H, Bloomfield K, Kramer S, Grittner U: Gender and cultural differences in the association between family roles, social stratification, and alcohol use: a European cross-cultural analysis. Alcohol Alcohol Suppl. 2006, 41 (1): i37-i46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Grittner U, Kuntsche S, Graham K, Bloomfield K: Social inequalities and gender differences in the experience of alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Alcohol. 2012, 47 (5): 597-605. 10.1093/alcalc/ags040.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Keyes KM, Li G, Hasin DS: Birth cohort effects and gender differences in alcohol epidemiology: a review and synthesis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011, 35 (12): 2101-2112. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01562.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Wennberg P, Bohman M, Andersson T: Variations and stability in drinking patterns in a cohort of Swedish males. Scand J Public Health. 2000, 28 (4): 312-316. 10.1177/14034948000280040301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Shillington AM, Reed MB, Clapp JD: Self-Report Stability of Adolescent Cigarette Use Across Ten Years of Panel Study Data. J Child Adoles Subst. 2010, 19 (2): 171-191. 10.1080/10678281003635089.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/525/prepub

Copyright

© Sydén et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement