Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Public Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence and risk factors for cervical neoplasia: a cervical cancer screening program in Beijing

  • Lixin Tao1, 2,
  • Lili Han3,
  • Xia Li1, 2,
  • Qi Gao1, 2,
  • Lei Pan1, 2,
  • Lijuan Wu1, 2,
  • Yanxia Luo1, 2,
  • Wei Wang1, 2, 4,
  • Zihe Zheng1, 2 and
  • Xiuhua Guo1, 2Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Public Health201414:1185

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1185

Received: 9 April 2013

Accepted: 6 November 2014

Published: 19 November 2014

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer and cause of cancer-related death for women worldwide. The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of cervical neoplasia and examine factors associated with high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) among women taking part in a cervical cancer screening program in Beijing.

Methods

Women aged 25–65 years were screened using the ThinPrep cytologic test and gynecologic examination. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to investigate factors associated with HSIL.

Results

Among 728,704 women screened, the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I, II, III was 50.2, 34.0, and 36.4 per 100,000, respectively. Prevalence of cervical cancer was 12.2 per 100,000. Risk factors for HSIL included being in age group of 46–55 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.07–1.44, compared with the 25–35 age group), bleeding after intercourse (aOR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.40–3.10), and presence of trichomonas vaginalis infection (aOR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.35–5.07), cervical inflammation (aOR = 4.22, 95% CI: 3.39–5.26), and genital warts (aOR = 3.89, 95% CI: 2.54–7.70). High education level (college and above compared with junior middle school or lower) was found to be protective (aOR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.37–0.90).

Conclusions

The prevalence of cervical neoplasia is relatively high in Beijing. Women aged 46–55 years, those with a lower education level, those reporting bleeding after intercourse, and those affected by Trichomonas vaginalis infection, cervical inflammation and genital warts are at higher risk for HSIL. Particular efforts should be made to ensure these women are included in cervical cancer screening programs.

Keywords

Cervical cancerScreening programRisk factorHigh-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions

Background

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer and cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide [1, 2]. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) refers to changes in squamous cells of the cervix, where more extensive changes (CIN grades II and III) are known as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). At least 25% of women with HSIL will progress to carcinoma in situ or invasive cancer if lesions are left untreated [3]. The identification of risk factors for HSIL is of pivotal importance.

Evidence suggests that human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and health-related lifestyles influence the progression of CIN. HPV plays a crucial role in the development of cervical cancer and the precursor lesions. HPV is essential to the transformation of cervical epithelial cells, particularly subtypes 16 and 18 [46]. However, only a minority of women infected with HPV progress to CIN or HSIL. Therefore, cofactors that aid viral persistence and disease progression must exist.

A positive association between smoking and cervical cancer has consistently been observed, across different geographic regions [79]. Dose–response associations with smoking intensity and duration were detected in a previous study [10]. However, adenocarcinoma of the cervix, which usually accounts for less than 10% of all cervical cancers, has no significant association with smoking [11]. Increased risk of invasive cervical cancer with exposure to passive smoking during adulthood has been demonstrated [12, 13]. Indoor exposure to cooking oil fumes is associated with CIN [3], while cooking in kitchens equipped with fume extractors and keeping extractors on while cooking can protect women from this risk [14].

In recent years, strong evidence from many epidemiologic and experimental studies has emerged, demonstrating that inflammation also plays an important role in the development of CIN and cervical cancer [15, 16]. An association between the use of anti-inflammatory drugs and reduced risk of cancer, as well as a decrease in precancerous lesions, was shown in epidemiologic studies [16, 17].

Factors relating to sexual behavior have also been linked to cervical cancer and its precursors. Studies have demonstrated that bacterial vaginosis and Trichomonas vaginalis infection are significantly associated with persistent HPV infection and the development of cervical cancer [1820]. Many studies have also suggested that women with multiple sexual partners are at high risk for HPV acquisition and cervical cancer [21, 22]. Oral contraceptive use is associated with the development of cervical cancer [2325]. A systematic review of hormonal contraceptive use reported that the risk of in situ cervical cancer increased even for women with less than 5 years’ hormonal contraceptive use, but the risk of invasive cervical cancer increased only after 5 years’ use. The risk for both conditions declined with time since last use of hormonal contraceptives, and there was no elevated risk for invasive cervical cancer 10 years since the end of exposure [26].

The cervical cancer screening program was free for 25 to 65-year-old women permanently residing in Beijing in 2009. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no similar, large-scale cervical cancer screening program conducted in Beijing prior to this. The aims of the present study were to estimate prevalence of cervical neoplasia and explore potential risk factors for HSIL among women living in Beijing.

Methods

Subjects

This study was conducted in 2009 as part of a national program offering free cervical and breast cancer screening for 25 to 65-year-old women permanently residing in Beijing. All women aged 25–65 years who were willing to participate in the screening program were included, with the exception of those with a history of uterine sarcoma, fallopian tube tumors, uterine fibroids, benign ovarian tumors, ovarian cancer, vulvar carcinoma, vulvar malignant melanoma, organ transplant or cancer treatment. Women were informed of the purpose of the screening program and gave their signed, informed consent prior to enrolment. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University.

Data collection

Data were collected by cervical cancer screening case record cards. The cards recorded socio-demographic information, reproductive history and sexual behavior, medical history, gynecologic examination history, and TCT and histologic test results.

A technical manual was designed to standardize the screening process, and medical staff were trained prior to commencement of the program. All gynecologic examinations were supervised and gynecologists conducted each examination blinded to the results of the TCT test. If TCT results were abnormal, subjects were referred for histologic testing to determine CIN grade and to receive relevant treatment. Approximately 10% of gynecologic examinations were double-checked by experts and the coincident diagnosis rate was 95%. Additionally, screening experts checked 20% of the positive results and 10% of the negative results. Approximately 5% of all record cards were randomly checked and the proportion with errors or omissions was less than 5%.

Socio-demographic information recorded for each woman included age, education level, occupation, and address. Information was also collected on reproductive history and sexual characteristics, including length of menstrual cycle, duration of menstrual period, gravidity, parity, number of abortions, contraceptives used, reported bleeding after intercourse, and detection of Trichomonas vaginalis infection, yeast infection, bacterial vaginosis, cervical inflammation, and genital warts. Medical history included any history of uterine sarcoma, fallopian tube tumors, uterine fibroids, ovary benign tumors, ovarian cancer, vulvar carcinoma, vulvar malignant melanoma, organ transplants, or cancer treatment.

Outcome variables

The primary study outcome was CIN grade, categorized as: normal, CIN I, CIN II, CIN III, and cervical cancer. HSIL was defined as CIN grades II and III.

Statistical analysis

Distributions of participants’ characteristics were examined by rank-sum test, χ 2, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Participants with CIN II and CIN III grades were combined as a HSIL group for subsequent univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the association between HSIL and each potential risk factor. Data were analyzed using SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Chicago, IL, USA) and ArcGIS (ArcGIS 10; ESRI Inc., Redlands, CA, USA).

Results

A total of 728,704 women from the 18 districts of Beijing participated in the screening program, representing 9.4% of the 25 to 65-year-old female population in Beijing in 2009. Of these participants, 366 women (50.2 per 100,000) were diagnosed as CIN I, 248 (34.0 per 100,000) as CIN II, 265 (36.4 per 100,000) as CIN III and 89 (12.2 per 100,000) as having cervical cancer. Prevalence of HSIL (CIN grades II and III) was 70.40 per 100,000 women. The prevalence of HSIL and cervical cancer by Beijing district are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Yanqing district had the highest prevalence of CIN I, CIN II, and HSIL, at 136.8, 119.0, and 255.8 per 100,000, respectively. The highest prevalence of CIN III was in Mentougou district (149.3 per 100,000) and the highest prevalence of cervical cancer was in Xicheng district (25.3 per 100,000).There were significant differences between women with HSIL (n = 513) and those with normal histology (n = 702,168) in terms of age group, education level, parity, bleeding after intercourse, contraceptive used, presence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection, cervical inflammation, and genital warts. However, there was no significant difference in terms of work or not, menstrual cycle, menstrual period, gravidity, number of abortions, and presence of yeast infection and bacterial vaginosis (Table 2). Risk factors significantly associated with presence of HSIL in univariate logistic regression were being in age band of 46–55 years (compared with the reference group 25–35 years), higher education level, parity, bleeding after intercourse, and presence of Trichomonas vaginalis, cervical inflammation and genital warts (Table 3). Risk factors that remained significant in multivariate logistic regression were being in the age band of 46–55 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.07–1.44, compared with the age band of 25–35 years), bleeding after intercourse (aOR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.40–3.10), and presence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection (aOR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.35–5.07), cervical inflammation (aOR = 4.22, 95% CI: 3.39–5.26) and genital warts (aOR = 3.89, 95% CI: 2.54–7.70). Higher education level was found to be protective against HSIL (aOR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.37–0.90, college and above compared with junior middle school or lower education level) (Table 4, Figure 2).
Table 1

The prevalence of CIN and cervical cancer

Districts

Total

CIN I [n (/100,000)]

CIN II [n (/100,000)]

CIN III [n (/100,000)]

HSIL(CIN II/III) [n (/100,000)]

Cervical cancer [n (/100,000)]

Dongcheng

13194

6 (45.5)

3 (22.7)

4 (30.3)

7 (53.1)

1 (7.6)

Xicheng

27649

23 (83.2)

25 (90.4)

30 (108.5)

55 (198.9)

7 (25.3)

Chongwen

8382

3 (35.8)

3 (35.8)

5 (59.7)

8 (95.4)

0 (0.0)

Xuanwu

18787

1 (5.3)

3 (16.0)

11 (58.6)

14 (74.5)

1 (5.3)

Chaoyang

121141

128 (105.7)

71 (58.6)

69 (57.0)

140 (115.6)

25 (20.6)

Haidian

83442

27 (32.4)

27 (32.4)

21 (25.2)

48 (57.5)

4 (4.8)

Fengtai

63816

8 (12.5)

7 (11.0)

5 (7.8)

12 (18.8)

9 (14.1)

Shijingshan

25987

19 (73.1)

9 (34.6)

19 (73.1)

28 (107.8)

5 (19.2)

Mentougou

13395

8 (59.7)

3 (22.4)

20 (149.3)

23 (171.7)

1 (7.5)

Fangshan

72004

22 (30.6)

8 (11.1)

4 (5.6)

12 (16.7)

1 (1.4)

Daxing

53898

5 (9.3)

5 (9.3)

5 (9.3)

10 (18.6)

13 (24.1)

Tongzhou

26183

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (7.6)

2 (7.6)

2 (7.6)

Shunyi

72194

32 (44.3)

22 (30.5)

19 (26.3)

41 (56.8)

6 (8.3)

Pinggu

30937

8 (25.9)

6 (19.4)

7 (22.6)

13 (42.0)

1 (3.2)

Huairou

46360

43 (92.8)

32 (69.0)

15 (32.4)

47 (101.4)

8 (17.3)

Miyun

22953

7 (30.5)

2 (8.7)

5 (21.8)

7 (30.5)

2 (8.7)

Changping

11570

3 (25.9)

2 (17.3)

1 (8.6)

3 (25.9)

1 (8.6)

Yanqing

16812

23 (136.8)

20 (119.0)

23 (136.8)

43 (255.8)

2 (11.9)

Total

728704

366 (50.2)

248 (34.0)

265 (36.4)

513 (70.4)

89 (12.2)

Abbreviations: CIN cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, HSIL high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Figure 1

The prevalence of a) HSIL and b) cervical cancer in 18 districts of Beijing. Abbreviation: HSIL = high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Table 2

Basic characteristics of subjects

Variables

Normal

HSIL

/100,000

 

P

Age group

   

26.93

<0.0001

 25-35

76694

56

73.0

  

 36-45

201001

151

75.1

  

 46-55

283055

247

87.2

  

 56-65

141418

59

41.7

  

Education level

   

7.89

0.0193

 Junior middle school or lower

468032

365

77.9

  

 High school or technical secondary school

156502

110

70.2

  

 College and above

77634

38

48.9

  

Work or not

   

0.77

0.3807

 Yes

487062

365

74.9

  

 No

215106

148

68.8

  

Bleeding after intercourse

   

12.47

0.0004

 No

682097

485

71.1

  

 Yes

20071

28

139.3

  

Contraceptive used

   

195.00

<0.0001

 Condom

340067

186

54.7

  

 Contraceptive pills

11551

34

293.5

  

 Intrauterine device use

196821

196

99.5

  

 Security period

981

3

304.9

  

 Coitus interruptus

7955

25

313.3

  

 No contraceptive measures

144793

69

47.6

  

Trichomonas vaginalis

   

0.0140

 No

697064

504

72.3

  

 Yes

5104

9

176.0

  

Yeast infection

   

0.7595

 No

698372

510

73.0

  

 Yes

3796

3

79.0

  

Bacterial vaginosis

   

0.5268

 No

698835

510

72.9

  

 Yes

3333

3

90.0

  

Cervical inflammation

   

191.77

<0.0001

 No

658979

406

61.6

  

 Yes

43189

107

247.1

  

Genital warts

   

0.0013

 No

699972

506

72.2

  

 Yes

2196

7

317.8

  

Menstrual cycle

29 (28–30) a

29 (28–30) a

.

0.67 b

0.4140 b

Menstrual period

5 (4–6) a

5 (4–7) a

.

2.97 b

0.0851 b

Gravity

2 (1–3) a

2 (2–3) a

.

0.16 b

0.6902 b

Parity

1 (1–2) a

1 (1–1) a

.

18.55 b

<0.0001 b

Number of abortion

1 (1–2) a

1 (0–2) a

.

2.77 b

0.0963 b

 Total

702168

513

   

Abbreviations: HSIL high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Trichomonas vaginalis is defined as vaginalis infected by trichomonas. Yeast infection is defined as vaginosis infected by yeast. Bacterial vaginosis is defined as vaginosis infected by bacterial. Cervical inflammation is defined as moderate or serious inflammation.

a : Median (P25-P75).

b : Rank sum test.

−: Fisher’s exact test.

Table 3

Risk factors for HSIL assessed by univariate logistic regression

Variables

OR

95% CI for OR

P

  

Lower

Upper

 

Age group

    

 25-35

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 36-45

1.37

0.82

1.84

0.6521

 46-55

1.15

1.01

3.98

0.0302

 56-65

0.57

0.40

1.12

0.3601

Education level

    

 Junior middle school or lower

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 High school or technical secondary school

1.68

0.98

2.04

0.3112

 College and above

0.54

0.10

0.87

0.0261

Work or not

    

 Yes

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 no

1.03

0.85

1.25

0.7356

Contraceptive used

    

 Condom

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Contraceptive pills

1.15

0.64

2.06

0.9484

 Intrauterine device use

1.29

0.94

1.59

0.9442

 Hypoderm contraceptive implants

1.13

0.88

2.14

0.9559

 Security period

0.59

0.19

1.85

0.9720

 Coitus interruptus

1.42

0.83

1.97

0.9406

 No contraceptive measures

0.90

0.68

1.20

0.9568

Bleeding after intercourse

    

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

2.60

1.75

3.86

<0.0001

Trichomonas vaginalis

    

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

2.55

1.32

4.93

0.0055

Yeast infection

    

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.14

0.37

3.54

0.8248

Bacterial vaginosis

    

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.31

0.42

4.08

0.6389

Cervical inflammation

    

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

4.27

3.45

5.28

<0.0001

Genital warts

    

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

4.41

2.82

6.19

<0.0001

Menstrual cycle

1.00

0.99

1.01

0.9911

Menstrual period

1.02

0.97

1.08

0.4526

Gravity

0.99

0.92

1.06

0.7287

Parity

0.74

0.65

0.86

<0.0001

Number of abortions

0.98

0.63

1.53

0.9225

Abbreviations: HSIL high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.

Table 4

Risk factors for HSIL assessed by multivariate logistic regression

Variables

OR

95% CI for OR

P

  

Lower

Upper

 

Age group

    

 25-35

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 36-45

1.46

0.88

1.98

0.2143

 46-55

1.15

1.07

1.44

0.0254

 56-65

0.78

0.52

1.16

0.4399

Education level

    

 Junior middle school or lower

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 High school or technical secondary school

1.59

0.90

1.96

0.2416

 College and above

0.79

0.37

0.90

0.0337

Bleeding after intercourse

    

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

2.08

1.40

3.10

0.0003

Trichomonas vaginalis

    

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

2.62

1.35

5.07

0.0043

Cervical inflammation

    

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

4.22

3.39

5.26

<0.0001

Genital warts

    

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

3.89

2.54

7.70

<0.0001

Abbreviations: HSIL high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.

Figure 2

Adjusted OR and 95% CI for risk factors for HSIL. Abbreviation: HSIL = high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; age group (46–55 vs 25–35); education level (college and above vs junior middle school or lower).

Discussion

This study represents the first large-scale cervical cancer screening program in Beijing. Women in 18 districts aged 25–65 years and with a registered, permanent Beijing address were eligible to participate. However, only 9.4% of eligible women were evaluated. The prevalence of CIN I, II, III, and cervical cancer was 50.2, 34.0, 36.4, and 12.2 per 100,000, respectively. Identified risk factors for HSIL in this population were being in the age group of 46–55 years, bleeding after intercourse, presence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection, cervical inflammation, and genital warts, while higher education was found to be protective.

Prevalence of precancerous cervical lesions (CIN grades I–III) in this study population (0.12%) was lower than that reported in 2009 (0.20%) [27]. Prevalence of cervical cancer was 12.2 per 100,000, which is comparable to rates reported elsewhere: 16.2 per 100,000 and 10.3 per 100,000 reported from more developed countries, and 19.1 per 100,000 reported from less developed countries [28]. While the study population in this study is predominantly urban, there appears to be little difference in rates of cervical cancer between urban and rural regions in China. According to China Cancer Registration Annual Report 2004, in which 43 cancer registries were included, the incidence of cervical cancer was 5.3 per 100,000 in urban and 4.9 per 100,000 in rural areas [29].

Supporting results from previous studies, being aged 46–55 years and having a lower educational attainment level were identified as significant risk factors for HSIL in our study. A community-based screening program in Hong Kong similarly found that women aged 40–49 years and women having received primary school education only were at increased risk of cervical abnormalities [30]. Other studies have also identified older age, high gravidity, and low educational status as significant risk factors for development of cervical cancer [3134].

Our results show that women who reported bleeding after intercourse had a higher risk of developing cervical epithelial abnormality. This association has been identified previously [35] and is not surprising, as bleeding after intercourse may indicate vaginal infections, cervical dysplasia, or uterine fibroids, all of which may lead to cervical abnormalities.

There was a significant association between an abnormal TCT test and having a history of gynecologic infections. Trichomonas vaginalis infection was associated with a high relative risk of HSIL. This supports previous findings: a meta-analysis of 24 studies examining the association between Trichomonas vaginalis infection and cervical neoplasia (including both CIN and cervical cancer) found a significant positive association [36]. There is some epidemiologic evidence to suggest that genital tract disease such as cervical inflammation might be linked to cervical cancer or high-grade lesions [37, 38], and a significant association between cervical inflammation and HISL was identified in this study. Trichomonas vaginalis may act as a cofactor facilitating the development of cervical HPV infection to high-grade lesion and cervical cancer [39, 40]. Multiple studies have demonstrated an association between previous and current Trichomonas vaginalis infection and cervical dysplasia and human papillomavirus [4143]. A history of genital warts has been reported as a good predictor of risk for carcinoma in situ [44] and the similar association was detected in the present study. The association between genital warts and HISL is likely due to concurrent infection with different HPV subtypes [45, 46]. It is also probably related to multiple sex partners [47].

There are some limitations to this study. First, the authors did not receive information on many other lifestyle factors that may potentially be associated with development of cervical abnormalities. Information on smoking, alcohol consumption and other lifestyle factors is required to explore their association with HSIL. Second, because of budget limitations, detection of HPV infection was not included in this study, which is crucial in the development of CIN and cervical cancer. Despite this, the current study, benefitting from a large sample size, provides valuable information for the assessment of CIN and cervical cancer.

Conclusions

The prevalence of cervical neoplasia was relatively high. Women in the age group of 46–55 years, those with lower educational attainment, those reporting bleeding after intercourse, and those suffering from Trichomonas vaginalis infection, cervical inflammation and genital warts are at high risk for HSIL. Particular efforts should be made to ensure these women are included in cervical cancer screening programs.

Notes

Abbreviations

HSIL: 

High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

CIN: 

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

aOR: 

Adjusted odds ratio

CI: 

Confidence interval

HPV: 

Human papillomavirus

TCT: 

ThinPrep cytologic test.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the program of Natural Science Fund of China (Serial Number: 81172772), the Program of Natural Science Fund of Beijing (Serial Number: 7131002, 4112015) and the Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program in the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period of China (Serial Number: 2011BAI08B01). We also thank all the medical personnel from the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospitals of the 18 districts of Beijing who participated in the screening program and collected the data.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Public Health, Capital Medical University
(2)
Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology
(3)
Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
(4)
School of Medical Science, Edith Cowan University

References

  1. Bekkers RL, Massuger LF, Bulten J, Melchers WJ: Epidemiological and clinical aspects of human papillomavirus detection in the prevention of cervical cancer. Rev Med Virol. 2004, 14 (2): 95-105. 10.1002/rmv.416.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chirenje ZM: HIV and cancer of the cervix. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005, 19 (2): 269-276. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wu MT, Lee LH, Ho CK, Wu SC, Lin LY, Cheng BH, Liu CL, Yang CY, Tsai HT, Wu TN: Environmental exposure to cooking oil fumes and cervical intraepithelial neoplasm. Environ Res. 2004, 94 (1): 25-32. 10.1016/S0013-9351(03)00118-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Verhoef VM, Heideman DA, van Kemenade FJ, Rozendaal L, Bosgraaf RP, Hesselink AT, Bekkers RL, Massuger LF, Steenbergen RD, Snijders PJ, Berkhof J, Meijer CJ: Methylation marker analysis and HPV16/18 genotyping in high-risk HPV positive self-sampled specimens to identify women with high grade CIN or cervical cancer. Gynecol oncol. 2014, 135 (1): 58-63. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Agorastos T, Chatzistamatiou K, Zafrakas M, Siamanta V, Katsamagkas T, Constantinidis TC, Lampropoulos AF, Lysistrata study group: Epidemiology of HPV infection and current status of cervical cancer prevention in Greece: final results of the LYSISTRATA cross-sectional study. Eur J cancer prev. 2014, 23 (5): 425-431. 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Vidal AC, Smith JS, Valea F, Bentley R, Gradison M, Yarnall KS, Ford A, Overcash F, Grant K, Murphy SK, Hoyo C: HPV genotypes and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a multiethnic cohort in the southeastern USA. Cancer causes control. 2014, 25 (8): 1055-1062. 10.1007/s10552-014-0406-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. IARC: Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Personal habits and indoor combustions-a review of human carcinogens. Vol 100E. 2012, Lyon, France: IARC PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Roura E, Castellsague X, Pawlita M, Travier N, Waterboer T, Margall N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Dillner J, Gram IT, Tjonneland A, Munk C, Pala V, Palli D, Khaw KT, Barnabas RV, Overvad K, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Fagherazzi G, Kaaks R, Lukanova A, Steffen A, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Klinaki E, Tumino R, Sacerdote C, Panico S, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, et al: Smoking as a major risk factor for cervical cancer and pre-cancer: results from the EPIC cohort. Int J Cancer. 2014, 135 (2): 453-466. 10.1002/ijc.28666.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Guillaud M, Buys TP, Carraro A, Korbelik J, Follen M, Scheurer M, Storthz KA, van Niekerk D, MacAulay CE: Evaluation of HPV Infection and Smoking Status Impacts on Cell Proliferation in Epithelial Layers of Cervical Neoplasia. PloS one. 2014, 9 (9): e107088-10.1371/journal.pone.0107088.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Appleby P, Beral V, Berrington De Gonzalez A, Colin D, Franceschi S, Goodill A, Green J, Peto J, Plummer M, Sweetland S: Carcinoma of the cervix and tobacco smoking: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 13,541 women with carcinoma of the cervix and 23,017 women without carcinoma of the cervix from 23 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2006, 118 (6): 1481-1495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Sweetland S, Green J: Comparison of risk factors for squamous cell and adenocarcinomas of the cervix: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2004, 90 (9): 1787-1791.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsai HT, Tsai YM, Yang SF, Wu KY, Chuang HY, Wu TN, Ho CK, Lin CC, Kuo YS, Wu MT: Lifetime cigarette smoke and second-hand smoke and cervical intraepithelial neoplasm-a community-based case–control study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007, 105 (1): 181-188. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.11.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins S, Rollason TP, Young LS, Woodman CB: Cigarette smoking is an independent risk factor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in young women: a longitudinal study. Eur J Cancer. 2010, 46 (2): 405-411. 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.09.015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee CH, Yang SF, Peng CY, Li RN, Chen YC, Chan TF, Tsai EM, Kuo FC, Huang JJ, Tsai HT, Hung YH, Huang HL, Tsai S, Wu MT: The precancerous effect of emitted cooking oil fumes on precursor lesions of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010, 127 (4): 932-941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Parida S, Mandal M: Inflammation induced by human papillomavirus in cervical cancer and its implication in prevention. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2014, 23 (5): 432-448. 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Murdoch C, Lewis CE: Macrophage migration and gene expression in response to tumor hypoxia. Int J Cancer. 2005, 117 (5): 701-708. 10.1002/ijc.21422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zha S, Yegnasubramanian V, Nelson WG, Isaacs WB, De Marzo AM: Cyclooxygenases in cancer: progress and perspective. Cancer lett. 2004, 215 (1): 1-20. 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.06.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. IARC: Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Biological agents-a review of human carcinogens. Vol 100B. 2009, Lyon, France: IARC PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Lazenby GB, Taylor PT, Badman BS, McHaki E, Korte JE, Soper DE, Young Pierce J: An association between Trichomonas vaginalis and high-risk human papillomavirus in rural Tanzanian women undergoing cervical cancer screening. Clin Ther. 2014, 36 (1): 38-45. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.11.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillet E, Meys JF, Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, De Sutter P, Temmerman M, Vanden Broeck D: Association between bacterial vaginosis and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2012, 7 (10): e45201-10.1371/journal.pone.0045201.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Remschmidt C, Kaufmann AM, Hagemann I, Vartazarova E, Wichmann O, Delere Y: Risk factors for cervical human papillomavirus infection and high-grade intraepithelial lesion in women aged 20 to 31 years in Germany. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013, 23 (3): 519-526. 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318285a4b2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Clements AE, Raker CA, Cooper AS, Boardman LA: Prevalence and patient characteristics associated with CIN 3 in adolescents. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 204 (2): 128. e1-7-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao T, Wang J, Yang M, Li H: Transcriptome analysis reveals the effect of oral contraceptive use on cervical cancer. Mol Med Rep. 2014, 10 (4): 1703-1708.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. La Vecchia C, Boccia S: Oral contraceptives, human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2014, 23 (2): 110-112. 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vessey M, Yeates D: Oral contraceptive use and cancer: final report from the Oxford-Family Planning Association contraceptive study. Contraception. 2013, 88 (6): 678-683. 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.08.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith JS, Green J, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Appleby P, Peto J, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Beral V: Cervical cancer and use of hormonal contraceptives: a systematic review. Lancet. 2003, 361 (9364): 1159-1167. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12949-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Xiang W, Zhao FH, Shi JF, Li ZX, Ma JF, Qiao YL, Wang Y: Feasibility of packaging screening for cervical cancer, breast cancer, and reproductive tract infection in a rural area in China. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2009, 31 (5): 616-619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lei T, Mao WM, Lei TH, Dai LQ, Fang L, Chen WQ, Zhang SW: Incidence and mortality trend of cervical cancer in 11 cancer registries of china. Chin J Cancer Res. 2011, 23 (1): 10-14. 10.1007/s11670-011-0010-x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. National Office for Cancer Prevention and Control: Chinese Cancer Annual Report 2004. 2008, Beijing: Publication House of Peking Union Medical CollegeGoogle Scholar
  30. Wong HY, Loke AY, Chan NH: Risk factors for cervical abnormalities among Hong Kong Chinese women: a large-scale community-based cervical screening program. J Womens Health. 2011, 20 (1): 53-59. 10.1089/jwh.2009.1866.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Thulaseedharan JV, Malila N, Hakama M, Esmy PO, Cheriyan M, Swaminathan R, Muwonge R, Sankaranarayanan R: Socio demographic and reproductive risk factors for cervical cancer-a large prospective cohort study from rural India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012, 13 (6): 2991-2995. 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2991.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ibrahim A, Rasch V, Pukkala E, Aro AR: Predictors of cervical cancer being at an advanced stage at diagnosis in Sudan. Int J Womens Health. 2011, 3: 385-389.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Sogukpinar N, Saydam BK, Can HO, Hadimli A, Bozkurt OD, Yucel U, Kocak YC, Akmese ZB, Demir D, Ceber E, Ozenturk G: Assessment of cervical cancer risk in women between 15 and 49 years of age: case of Izmir. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013, 14 (3): 2119-2125. 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.3.2119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Thuler LC, de Aguiar SS, Bergmann A: Determinants of late stage diagnosis of cervical cancer in Brazil. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2014, 36 (6): 237-243. 10.1590/S0100-720320140005010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Binswanger IA, Mueller S, Clark CB, Cropsey KL: Risk factors for cervical cancer in criminal justice settings. J Womens Health. 2011, 20 (12): 1839-1845. 10.1089/jwh.2011.2864.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang ZF, Begg CB: Is Trichomonas vaginalis a cause of cervical neoplasia? Results from a combined analysis of 24 studies. Int J Epidemiol. 1994, 23 (4): 682-690. 10.1093/ije/23.4.682.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Castle PE, Hillier SL, Rabe LK, Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Bratti MC, Sherman ME, Burk RD, Rodriguez AC, Alfaro M, Hutchinson ML, Morales J, Schiffman M: An association of cervical inflammation with high-grade cervical neoplasia in women infected with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001, 10 (10): 1021-1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Anorlu RI, Abdul-Kareem FB, Abudu OO, Oyekan TO: Cervical cytology in an urban population in Lagos, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003, 23 (3): 285-288. 10.1080/01443610310000100114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kalantari N, Ghaffari S, Bayani M: Trichomonas, Candida, and gardnerella in cervical smears of Iranian women for cancer screening. N Am J Med Sci. 2014, 6 (1): 25-29. 10.4103/1947-2714.125861.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Hawes SE, Kiviat NB: Are genital infections and inflammation cofactors in the pathogenesis of invasive cervical cancer?. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002, 94 (21): 1592-1593. 10.1093/jnci/94.21.1592.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Viikki M, Pukkala E, Nieminen P, Hakama M: Gynaecological infections as risk determinants of subsequent cervical neoplasia. Acta oncol. 2000, 39 (1): 71-75. 10.1080/028418600431003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Noel JC, Fayt I, Romero Munoz MR, Simon P, Engohan-Aloghe C: High prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus infection among women with Trichomonas vaginalis infection on monolayer cytology. Arch Gynecol obstet. 2010, 282 (5): 503-505. 10.1007/s00404-009-1291-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Depuydt CE, Leuridan E, Van Damme P, Bogers J, Vereecken AJ, Donders GG: Epidemiology of Trichomonas vaginalis and human papillomavirus infection detected by real-time PCR in flanders. Gynecol obstet invest. 2010, 70 (4): 273-280. 10.1159/000314017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Bhatia N, Lynde C, Vender R, Bourcier M: Understanding genital warts: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and burden of disease of human papillomavirus. J Cutan Med Surg. 2013, 17 (2 Suppl): S47-S54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Moscicki AB, Hills N, Shiboski S, Powell K, Jay N, Hanson E, Miller S, Clayton L, Farhat S, Broering J: Risks for incident human papillomavirus infection and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion development in young females. JAMA. 2001, 285 (23): 2995-3002. 10.1001/jama.285.23.2995.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Monteiro DL, Sodre DC, Russomano FB, Trajano AJ, Silva KS: Incidence of genital warts in adolescents and their association with cervical intraepithelial lesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013, 168 (1): 80-82. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Llata E, Stenger M, Bernstein K, Guerry S, Kerani R, Pugsley R, Pathela P, Tabidze I, Weinstock H, SSuN GW Working Group: Prevalence of genital warts among sexually transmitted disease clinic patients-sexually transmitted disease surveillance network, United States, January 2010 to December 2011. Sex Transm Dis. 2014, 41 (2): 89-93. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1185/prepub

Copyright

© Tao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement