Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Public Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Descriptive characterization of the 2010 cholera outbreak in Nigeria

  • Mahmood Muazu Dalhat1Email author,
  • Aisha Nasiru Isa1,
  • Patrick Nguku1,
  • Sani-Gwarzo Nasir2,
  • Katharina Urban1,
  • Mohammed Abdulaziz1,
  • Raymond Salanga Dankoli1,
  • Peter Nsubuga3 and
  • Gabriele Poggensee1
BMC Public Health201414:1167

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1167

Received: 11 April 2014

Accepted: 15 October 2014

Published: 16 November 2014

Abstract

Background

In 2010, 18 States of Nigeria reported cholera outbreaks with a total of 41,787 cases including 1,716 deaths (case-fatality rate [CFR]: 4.1%). This exceeded the mean overall CFR of 2.4% reported in Africa from 2000–2005 and the WHO acceptable rate of 1%. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the 2010 cholera outbreak to determine its epidemiological and spatio-temporal characteristics.

Methods

We conducted retrospective analysis of line lists obtained from 10 of the 18 states that submitted line lists to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH). We described the outbreak by time, place and person and calculated the attack rates by state as well as the age- and sex-specific CFR from cholera cases for whom information on age, sex, place of residence, onset of symptoms and outcome were available.

Results

A total of 21,111 cases were reported with an overall attack rate and CFR of 47.8 cases /100,000 population and 5.1%, respectively. The CFR ranged in the states between 3.8% and 8.9%. The age-specific CFR was highest among individuals 65 years and above (14.6%). The epidemiological curve showed three peaks with increasing number of weekly reported cases. A geographical clustering of LGAs reporting cholera cases could be seen in all ten states. During the third peak which coincided with flooding in five states the majority of newly affected LGAs were situated next to LGAs with previously reported cholera cases, only few isolated outbreaks were seen.

Conclusion

Our study showed a cholera outbreak that grew in magnitude and spread to involve the whole northern part of the country. It also highlights challenges of suboptimal surveillance and response in developing countries as well as potential endemicity of cholera in the northern part of Nigeria. There is the need for a harmonized, coordinated approach to cholera outbreaks through effective surveillance and response with emphasis on training and motivating front line health workers towards timely detection, reporting and response. Findings from the report should be interpreted with caution due to the high number of cases with incomplete information, and lack of data from eight states.

Keywords

CholeraOutbreakNigeriaCase fatality rateAttack rate

Background

Cholera is an acute enteric infection caused by the bacterium Vibrio (V.) cholerae of serogroup O1 or O139. It is a waterborne disease of important public health importance with an estimated number of 3 to 5 million cases annually and 100,000 to 150, 000 deaths yearly [1]. Outbreaks are linked to the consumption of unsafe water and food, poor hygiene and sanitation. Cholera often follows natural or man-made disasters which can lead to internal displacement of persons and subsequent unstable living conditions associated with contamination of food and water sources [2, 3]. Overflowing of latrines and contamination of wells and surface water, seasonal modification of water sources for consumption and human behavior may play a role in the occurrence of cholera outbreaks [4]. Control of cholera outbreaks requires effective surveillance and response systems which are frequently sub-optimal in developing countries often lacking robust data collection, collation, analysis, interpretation and response [5]. Poor detection and delayed response to cholera outbreaks can result in geographical spread of the disease and consequently high attack rates and case fatality rates [68]. Failure to control local outbreaks and prevention of between-region transmission could result in spread of cholera outbreaks to neighboring regions [9].

In 2010, a total of 110,115 cases were reported from sub-Saharan African countries, a 46% decline compared to 2009. However, four countries in Central Africa around the Lake Chad Basin (Cameroon, Chad, Niger and Nigeria) accounted for 62,762 cases, including 2,610 deaths, i.e. 54% of cases and 77% of deaths reported from the continent. Nigeria reported 38% of cases from Africa with 44,456 cases and a case fatality rate (CFR) of 3.9% [10]. This clearly exceeds the mean overall CFR of 2.4% reported in Africa from 2000–2005 and by far, the WHO acceptable rate of 1%. The 2010 cholera outbreak was the largest epidemic in Nigeria since 1991 when 59,478 cases and 7,654 deaths were reported [11]. The outbreak started from north-eastern border state of Borno and spread to involve 18 of the 36 states of the country. We conducted a descriptive analysis of surveillance data of the 2010 cholera outbreak with the aim of determining the epidemiological and spatio-temporal characteristics to explore possible reasons for the nationwide spread so as to provide information for future response to cholera outbreaks.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of cholera cases with information on age, sex, place of residence (Local Government Area (LGA) and onset of symptoms. All state epidemiologists who reported outbreaks to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) were requested to send copies of their line lists. In cases where NFELTP residents were sent for outbreak investigations, they retrieved and submitted the line lists for analysis. Data were extracted from the line lists obtained from 10 of the 18 states that submitted line lists to the FMOH: Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Jigawa, Kaduna, Katsina, Sokoto, Taraba, and Yobe. A cholera case was defined as any patient with acute watery diarrhea, with or without vomiting, during the period of the outbreak, based on the case definition provided in the National Technical Guidelines of the Integrated Diseases Surveillance and Response (IDSR) [12]. We included cases under the age of 5 years in our analysis as is been done in outbreak settings [7, 13, 14]. We analyzed and characterized the data in time, place, and person using Epi Info version 3.5.3. We computed the attack rate (AR: cases/100,000 population) using reported cases and the projected population data based on the 2006 census (Table 1) [15]. Case fatality rate (CFR) and age-specific CFR were calculated using cases with complete clinical information, which we defined as any patient with data on age, sex, state, and outcome (Figure 1). The numerator for the age-specific CFR is the number of deaths in the specific age group, while the denominator was the number of cases in the specific age groups with complete clinical information. All cases with incomplete information were excluded from the determination of CFR. We defined the first epidemiological week of the year as the week that ends on the first Saturday of January, as long as it falls at least 4 days into the month. Subsequently each epidemiological week begins on a Sunday and ends on a Saturday. For analysis, the year 2010 was divided into time periods (“waves”). A wave was defined as the time period from the beginning of a peak (first epidemiologic week with rising numbers of reported cases) to the end of a peak (epidemiologic week with nadir of reported cases/week before the next rise). The time periods were defined as follows: wave 1: epidemiological week 1 – 9; wave 2: epidemiologic week 10 – 24; wave 3: epidemiologic week 25 – 42.
Table 1

Cholera attack rates stratified by states, Nigeria 2010

State

Cases

Projected 2010 population

Attack rate/100,000 population

Adamawa

2,004

3,569,948

56,1

Bauchi

4,660

5,330,933

87,4*

Borno

2,616

4,778,758

54,7

Gombe

1,089

2,687,993

40,5

Jigawa

741

4,897,387

15,1*

Kaduna

778

6,892,955

11,3

Katsina

5,704

6,541,267

87,2*

Sokoto

248

4,174,756

5,9*

Taraba

536

2,577,051

20,8*

Yobe

2,735

2,670,175

102,4

Total

21,111

44,121,223

47,8

*States where flooding occurred between August and October 2010.

Figure 1

Flow chart of cholera cases reported in 2010 included in the analyses.

For the statistical analysis, we used the chi square test and compared medians to determine the difference in age groups affected during the different waves.

Ethical considerations

The surveillance data used for this analysis were generated within the frame of the IDSR in Nigeria [12] and analysed as part of an outbreak response of state and federal public health officials and residents of the NFELTP. Ethical waiver for the conduct of the study was obtained from the ethical committee of Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. The information collected in the data set (age, sex, date of onset of illness, Local government area, and outcome) was safeguarded within the database of the programme.

Results

We identified 21,111 cases (50.5% of all reported cases) that met the case definition among a total population of 44,121,223 in the 10 states. The first cases were documented in Borno State on 2nd January, 2010. The epidemic curve showed three peaks (Figure 2). The first peak was seen in week 4 (85 cases/week; cases reported from Borno and Yobe State) and the second peak was observed in week 21 (444 cases/week) with cases reported from five states. The third, most pronounced peak was observed in week 33 with all the 10 states affected (2,476 cases/week). Thereafter, with exception of week 36, the outbreak declined. By the epidemiological week 43 only 3 cases were reported.Overall, a geographical clustering of LGAs reporting cholera cases could be seen in all 10 states. The temporal spread of cholera as shown in Figure 3 revealed that only three LGAs were geographically isolated; the majority of LGAs were contiguous with more than one LGA reporting cholera cases (Figure 3). In the first wave with a maximum of less than 100 new cases per week, two LGAs in the east of Borno State situated at the border to Chad and Niger and five LGAs in Yobe State were affected. During the second wave with a peak of more than 400 new cases per week, 5 LGAs neighboring the first wave LGAs having reported cholera cases. Furthermore a new cluster was seen in Gombe State and several isolated outbreaks occurred in Jigawa and Katsina State. During the third wave, which coincided with flooding in five states and had the highest number of reported new cases per week, the majority of newly affected LGAs were situated next to LGAs with previously reported cholera cases, only few isolated outbreaks were seen.The median age of cases was 12 years (Interquartile range (IQR): 3–17), 51.5% were female (10,651 out of 20,688). The median age during the three waves differed significantly (p <0.001): wave 1: 6 years (IQR: 5–29 years), wave 2: 17 years (IQR: 5–29 years), wave 3: 12 years (IQR: 4–27 years). Children younger than 5 years were the most affected group in the first wave (40.9%), whereas in the second and third wave cholera cases were more frequently reported in adults aged 17 – 55 years (46.1% and 39.1%, respectively; Figure 4).
Figure 2

Epicurve of the cholera outbreak 2010, Nigeria.

Figure 3

Epidemiologic week of first reported cases in the Local Government areas during the three waves (Wave 1 (A): week 1 – week 9; wave 2 (B): week 10 – week 24; wave 3 (C): week 25 – week 42).

Figure 4

Age distribution of cholera cases during the three waves (wave 1: week 1 – 9; wave 2: week 10 – 24; wave 3: week 25 – 42), Nigeria, 2010.

The highest absolute numbers of cholera cases were seen in Bauchi and Katsina States (Table 1). The overall cholera attack rate (AR) in the 10 states was 47.8/100,000 population.

For 15,316 cases (72.5%), adequate clinical information was available for determination of CFR (Figure 1). A total of 784 deaths were documented given an overall CFR of 5.1% (Table 2). The CFR ranged in the states between 3.8% and 8.9%. The age-specific case fatality rate was highest among the elderly (65 years and above) with 14.5% (Table 3).
Table 2

Case fatality rates of cholera outbreak 2010 stratified by states and sex, Nigeria 2010 (n =15,316)

State

Female

Male

Overall CFR (%)

Total number of cases

Alive

Dead

CFR (%)

Total number of cases

Alive

Dead

CFR (%)

Adamawa

1,054

994

60

5.7

948

885

63

6.6

6.1

Borno

1,188

1,105

83

7.0

1,314

1,246

68

5.2

6.0

Gombe

544

527

17

3.1

516

493

23

4.5

3.8

Jigawa

369

349

20

5.4

358

343

15

4.2

4.8*

Kaduna

385

365

20

5.2

393

373

20

5.1

5.1

Katsina

2,827

2,720

107

3.8

1,903

1,810

93

4.9

4.2

Sokoto

131

118

13

9.9

117

108

9

7.7

8.9*

Taraba

240

222

18

7.5

296

277

19

6.4

6.9*

Yobe

1,259

1,208

51

4.1

1,474

1,389

85

5.8

5.0

Total

7,997

7,608

389

4.9

7,319

6,924

395

5.4

5.1

*States with cholera camps during the outbreak.

Table 3

Age-specific case fatality rates of cholera cases, Nigeria 2010

Age group (yrs)

Cases with documented outcome

Outcomes

Age-specific case fatality rates (%)

Alive

Dead

<5

3,940

3,788

152

3.9

5 – 17

4,680

4,443

237

5.1

18 – 44

5,015

4,792

223

4.4

45 – 64

1,282

1,160

122

9.5

65 and above

297

254

43

14.5

Total

15,214

14,437

777

5.1

Discussion

Our descriptive study analyzed a large cholera epidemic that spanned most of the year 2010 based on data from ten out of 18 affected states of Nigeria. The epidemic started in local government areas in the eastern part of the country with two local government areas neighboring an international border (Chad and Niger). Eventually the outbreak spread throughout the northern part of Nigeria in two more waves, the last wave with nearly 2,500 new cases per week with case fatality rates up to 8%.

High case fatality rates seen in outbreaks are associated with limited access to health care, insufficiencies of the health care system and limitations in the surveillance system capacities to trigger timely response [16]. With proper and timely case management a CFR of less than 1% can be achieved [17]. In 2010, Nigeria had a CFR of 5.1%, the highest in Africa. The CFR in the elderly (65 years and above) was significantly higher compared to the other age groups. Limited access to health services due to flooding and subsequent displacement during the third wave might have been a contributing factor; furthermore the high CFR might have been associated with co-morbidities in this age group. Marin et al. have shown that the cholera outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 in Nigeria were caused by multidrug resistant atypical El Tor O1 strains, which are reportedly highly virulent [18]. They concluded that guidelines for managing and containing cholera outbreaks in Nigeria (which include, in addition to rehydration, using the antimicrobials trimethoprim, and more recently ciprofloxacin) need to be revised to reflect local antimicrobial susceptibility testing in line with recent findings and universal guidelines [1922].

Generally, children younger than 5 years have the highest incidence of cholera and the age-specific mortality is highest in this age group [13, 14]. However, during the 2010 outbreak in Nigeria a different pattern was seen; only during the first wave children below the age of 5 years were the most affected group, during the second and third wave the majority of cases were adults. A possible explanation might have been increased exposure to V. cholerae due to the displacement of inhabitants associated with limited access to safe water during the floodings.

The outbreak appeared to have spread from Borno State to other states of the north-eastern region. These are states where people travel to and fro within a day. It is noteworthy that the outbreak had three waves with progressively increasing numbers with at least 12 weeks in between the waves. Our findings indicated that cases reported during the second and third waves of the cholera outbreak were mainly living in LGAs contiguous with areas that had previously reported cholera outbreaks during the first wave. An effective response to the outbreak in Borno therefore might have prevented the spread of cholera to other parts of the country. End of August 2010, during the rainy season (March to September) flooding occurred in some northern parts of Nigeria. As of October 2010 Jigawa, Katsina and Sokoto States were affected, and it was estimated that about 258,000 inhabitants were displaced due to the floods [23, 24]. Limited access to safe water resulting in contaminated food, insufficient sanitation and limited access to health services due to displacement might have contributed to the spread and impeded the containment of the outbreaks in these states during the third wave as established in other settings [68, 25].

Cholera cases were recorded from the beginning to the end of the outbreak in Borno State, suggesting possible endemicity of cholera in the country. This is in keeping with previous findings by Gaffga et al. and Maramovich and Deen in their separate reviews of cholera in Africa [2628].

The study highlights the challenges faced by developing countries in creating effective surveillance as well as preparedness and response to cholera outbreaks. There is the need for an effective surveillance system with the capacity to timely and appropriately respond to and contain cholera outbreaks locally before they spread to neighboring areas. The amount of data missing in the evaluation and the fact that cases reported from a whole state had no documented outcome implies that important epidemiological variables like the AR and CFR could not be accurately determined. The high number of children under 5 years documented during the outbreak indicates that the current IDSR definition that excludes children under 5 years should be reviewed for countries endemic for cholera or during outbreaks [27]. This fact has been considered by Heymann in his case definition of cholera [17].

Our findings should be interpreted with caution due to the high number of cases with incomplete information, and lack of data from eight states. This could affect the accuracy of the estimated AR and CFR as well as limit the ability to generalize our findings. The absence of data on clinical management also limits our ability to identify poor clinical case management as a cause of high CFR.

Conclusions

Our study showed a cholera outbreak that grew in magnitude and spread to involve the whole northern part of the country. It also showed potential endemicity of cholera in the northern part of Nigeria. There is the need for a harmonized, coordinated approach to cholera outbreaks through effective surveillance and response with emphasis on training and motivating front line health workers towards timely detection and response as well as proper documentation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the contributions of the state epidemiologists of the states involved in the study. Many thanks to the residents of the Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program for their contribution towards compiling the line lists used in the study. This publication was made possible by support from the PEPFAR through co-operative agreement (5U2GGH000431) from CDC, Global AIDS program. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme
(2)
Department of Public Health, Federal Ministry of Health
(3)
Global Public Health Solutions

References

  1. Cholera annual report 2011: Weekly Epidemiological Record, Volume 87. 2012, WHO Press, Geneva: World Health Organisation, 289-304.Google Scholar
  2. Shikanga OT, Mutonga D, Abade M, Amwayi S, Ope M, Limo H, Mintz ED, Quick RE, Breiman RF, Feikin DR: High mortality in a cholera outbreak in western Kenya after post-election violence in 2008. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 81 (6): 1085-1090. 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.09-0400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Siddique AK, Islam Q, Akram K, Mazumder Y, Mitra A, Eusof A: Cholera epidemic and natural disasters; where is the link. Trop Geogr Med. 1989, 41 (4): 377-382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gaudart J, Rebaudet S, Barrais R, Boncy J, Faucher B, Piarroux M, Magloire R, Thimothe G, Piarroux R: Spatio-temporal dynamics of cholera during the first year of the epidemic in Haiti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013, 7 (4): e2145-10.1371/journal.pntd.0002145.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Vugia DJ, Koehler JE, Ries AA: Surveillance for epidemic cholera in the Americas: an assessment. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ Morb Mortal Wkly Report CDC Surveill Summ Centers Dis Control. 1992, 41 (1): 27-34.Google Scholar
  6. Piarroux R, Barrais R, Faucher B, Haus R, Piarroux M, Gaudart J, Magloire R, Raoult D: Understanding the cholera epidemic, Haiti. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011, 17 (7): 1161-1168. 10.3201/eid1707.110059.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Update: outbreak of cholera ---Haiti, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010, 59 (48): 1586-1590.Google Scholar
  8. Griffith DC, Kelly-Hope LA, Miller MA: Review of reported cholera outbreaks worldwide, 1995–2005. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 75 (5): 973-977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tuite AR, Tien J, Eisenberg M, Earn DJ, Ma J, Fisman DN: Cholera epidemic in Haiti, 2010: using a transmission model to explain spatial spread of disease and identify optimal control interventions. Ann Intern Med. 2011, 154 (9): 593-601. 10.7326/0003-4819-154-9-201105030-00334.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. World Health Organization: Global Task Force on Cholera Control. Weekly Epidemiological Record: Cholera Articles. 2010, WHOGoogle Scholar
  11. Cholera vaccines: WHO position paper. Releve Epidemiologique Hebdomadaire/Section d'hygiene du Secretariat de la Societe des Nations = Weekly Epidemiological Record/Health Section of the Secretariat of the League of Nations. 2010, WHO Press, Geneva: World Health Organisation, 117-128.Google Scholar
  12. National Technical Guidelines for Integrated Diseases Surveillance and Response. 2001, Nigeria: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organisation, 1-229. 2Google Scholar
  13. Ise T, Pokharel BM, Rawal S, Shrestha RS, Dhakhwa JR: Outbreaks of cholera in Kathmandu Valley in Nepal. J Trop Pediatr. 1996, 42 (5): 305-307. 10.1093/tropej/42.5.305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ali M, Lopez AL, You YA, Kim YE, Sah B, Maskery B, Clemens J: The global burden of cholera. Bull World Health Organ. 2012, 90 (3): 209-218A. 10.2471/BLT.11.093427.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Population: Annual Abstract of Statistics. 2013, Abuja: National Bureau of Statistics, 18-Google Scholar
  16. Cholera 2009. Weekly Epidemiological Record, Volume 85. 2010, WHO Press, Geneva: World Health Organisation, 293-308.Google Scholar
  17. Heymann DL: Control of Communicable Diseases Manual. 2004, Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 18Google Scholar
  18. Marin MA, Thompson CC, Freitas FS, Fonseca EL, Aboderin AO, Zailani SB, Quartey NK, Okeke IN, Vicente AC: Cholera outbreaks in Nigeria are associated with multidrug resistant atypical El Tor and non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013, 7 (2): e2049-10.1371/journal.pntd.0002049.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Recommendations for the Use of Antibiotics for the Treatment of Cholera. 2013, Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and PreventionGoogle Scholar
  20. First steps for managing an outbreak of acute diarrhoea: WHO Global Task Force on Cholera Control. 2003Google Scholar
  21. Khan WA: Single dose azithromycin for childhood cholera. Indian Pediatr. 2010, 47 (4): 305-306. 10.1007/s13312-010-0054-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan WA, Saha D, Rahman A, Salam MA, Bogaerts J, Bennish ML: Comparison of single-dose azithromycin and 12-dose, 3-day erythromycin for childhood cholera: a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2002, 360 (9347): 1722-1727. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11680-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith D: Cholera kills more than 1,500 people in Nigeria. The Guardian. 2010, Lagos, Nigeria: Guardian News and MediaGoogle Scholar
  24. Akinboade L: Flood displaces 258,000 Nigerians – NEMA. Vanguard. 2010, Lagos, Nigeria: Vanguard Media LimitedGoogle Scholar
  25. Constantin De Magny G, Thiaw W, Kumar V, Manga NM, Diop BM, Gueye L, Kamara M, Roche B, Murtugudde R, Colwell RR: Cholera outbreak in senegal in 2005: was climate a factor?. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (8): e44577-10.1371/journal.pone.0044577.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Maramovich AS, Pinigin AF: Endemic cholera foci in Africa. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 1995, Suppl 2: 101-108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Deen JL, von Seidlein L, Sur D, Agtini M, Lucas ME, Lopez AL, Kim DR, Ali M, Clemens JD: The high burden of cholera in children: comparison of incidence from endemic areas in Asia and Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008, 2 (2): e173-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000173.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaffga NH, Tauxe RV, Mintz ED: Cholera: a new homeland in Africa?. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 77 (4): 705-713.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1167/prepub

Copyright

© Dalhat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement