Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Public Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose among residents in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China

  • Li Qi1, 2,
  • Liangui Feng3, 2,
  • Xianbin Ding2,
  • Deqiang Mao2,
  • Yulin Wang2 and
  • Hongyan Xiong1Email author
BMC Public Health201414:1152

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1152

Received: 24 October 2013

Accepted: 15 September 2014

Published: 6 November 2014

Abstract

Background

The Three Gorges Dam in China is the world’s largest hydro-electric scheme in the contemporary world. After the construction of the Dam, great changes took place on the residents’ lifestyles characterized by reduced physical activity due to the loss of arable land and a series of psychological problems caused by resettlement, which might be regarded as contributing factors to the development of diabetes in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (TGRR). However, there is no study that has been conducted targeting large population samples with the aim of determining the prevalence of diabetes in TGRR. This study purposed to estimate the prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) in the adult population ≥18 years in TGRR and to evaluate the associated risk factors.

Methods

A total of 3721 randomly selected adults, aged ≥18 years and having lived in TGRR for at least one year, participated in questionnaire-based interview from April to May 2013 and had their physical examinations and standard glucose taken. 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was conducted on the subjects with fasting glucose levels being ≥ 5.6 mmol/L. Diabetes and IFG were defined according to WHO 1999 criteria.

Results

The age-standardized prevalence of diabetes and IFG were 7.6% (7.9% among men and 7.4% among women) and 9.0% (9.1% among men and 8.9% among women), respectively. Among the identified cases of diabetes in this study, 54.46% (171/314) were newly diagnosed. The prevalence of diabetes cases rose with age (4.0%, 4.5%, 8.1%, 11.2%, 12.4% and 12.9% among persons who were 18 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69 and ≥ 70 years of age, respectively). The results of multivariate logistic-regression analyses showed that the diabetes was significantly linked to age, family history of diabetes, central obesity, educational level and hypertension for both men and women. In addition, smoking was significantly associated with diabetes in men.

Conclusions

Diabetes has become a major public health problem in the TGRR with a large number of the cases undiagnosed. These results suggest that regular population-based diabetes screening should be conducted to identify early-stage diabetes and integrated strategies aimed at the prevention and treatment of diabetes initiated.

Background

Diabetes ranks highly on the international health agenda as a global pandemic and as a threat to human health and global economies [1]. Most people with diabetes live in low- and middle-income countries [2]. China is one of the rapidly developing middle-income countries where the prevalence of diabetes has risen rapidly over the last 30 years [3]. Data from five national surveys indicates that the prevalence of diabetes grew nearly 17-fold from 0.7% in 1980 [4] to 11.6% in 2010 [5]. Although different sampling methods, screening procedures, and diagnostic criteria were used, the data from the national surveys indicate a rapid upsurge in the prevalence of diabetes amongst the Chinese population.

The Three Gorge Dam in China is the world’s largest hydroelectric scheme in the modern-day era. The Three Gorges Dam has created a reservoir with a total water surface area of 1080 km2. The region surrounding the reservoir has now come to be known as the Three Gorges Reservoir Region (TGRR). Considering the unprecedented magnitude and impact of the development of TGRR, it is worthwhile to examine the health profile of residents in TGRR. Some studies have already assessed the impact of the development on the environment, economic and psychological problems and parasitic diseases and showed a substantial effect [6]. However, there is no study conducted on a large population as a sample to determine the prevalence of diabetes in the TGRR.

To understand the prevalence and relevant factors relating to diabetes in TGRR, we conducted a cross-sectional survey from April to May 2013. We aimed at compiling useful information on the health profile of residents and create a database that can be useful to the local health professionals charged with controlling and managing diabetes in the TGGR.

Methods

Study population

The prior presumption of the prevalence of diabetes in TGRR would be more or less similar to the rate of China in 2007 (9.7%) [7]. With 95% confidence interval, the sample size of 3,365 subjects was required for this study. The formula for the sample size is shown as follows:
n = μ 2 π 1 - π δ 2 = 1.96 2 × 0.097 × 0.903 0.01 2 = 3365

Considering that the loss of follow-up rate was 10%, the total sample size was 3,701.

A multistage sampling method was used: stage 1, three regions were randomly selected from the whole of TGRR; stage 2, three towns were randomly selected from each of the sampled region; stage 3, four villages or communities were randomly selected from each of the sampled towns; stage 4, households within each village or community were listed, resulting to 110 households being randomly selected. In the final stage, 1 person at least 18 years old was randomly selected from each household using a Kish selection table [8]. When the selected individual declined or was unavailable on three occasions, a household for replacement was identified from households of similar composition in the same village or community with the exclusion of the already selected households, using a simple random sampling method. The replacements ensured an adequate sample size from each selected community or village. The inclusion criteria were that the subject be ≥18 years of age and had lived in TGRR for more than one year. However, pregnant females and mentally or physically handicapped people were disqualified from the study.

Finally, a total of 3960 people were selected and requested to participate in the survey, out of which 3721 completed and were included in the final analysis. The overall response rate was 93.96%.

The ethical clearance of this study was obtained from the ethical committee of research in Chongqing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before data collection.

Data collection

Questionnaire interview

A standardized questionnaire, designed based on the national surveillance of non-communicable diseases and its risk factors among adults in China, 2010, that covers demographic characteristics—age, gender, educational level, occupation and income, family medical history, and lifestyle risk factors —smoking, drinking, vegetable intake and physical activities, was performed by trained investigators.

Education level was categorized as ≤ primary school, junior middle school, senior middle school and ≥ College. Yearly family income was categorized as below 5,000 RMB, 5,000-9999 RMB, 10,000-49,999 RMB and above 50,000 RMB. Smoking was classified in terms of current smokers or non-smokers. Drinking was delineated as the consumption of at least 30 g of alcohol per week for 1 year or more. Vegetable intake was expressed as eating < 1 time/day, 1-2 times/day and ≥ 3 times/day. Regular physical activity was defined as participation in moderate or vigorous activity for ≥ 30 minutes/day at least 5 days per week. Static activities were delimited to sitting or lying down but without sleeping. Family history of diabetes or hypertension was defined as having at least one of the parents, brothers or sisters diagnosed with diabetes or hypertension in their lifetime.

Physical examinations and measurements

Height was measured twice with a tape measure attached to a wall to the nearest centimeter, whereas weight was recorded by use of a weighing scale to the nearest 0.1 kg, with the subject bare feet and wearing lightweight clothing, after which the average of the values of height and weight were worked out. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of weight (kg) to the square of height (m). Participants with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and <30 kg/m2 were classified as overweight, and those with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 were classified as obese [9]. Waist circumference was measured twice on standing participants; at the midpoint between the lower edge of the costal arch and the upper edge of the iliac crest and the mean calculated for analysis. Central obesity was defined as waist circumference of 90 cm or more in men and 80 cm or more in women [10]. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured three times for each subject, using a mercury sphygmobolometer while in a sitting position with an interval of 15 min rest, and the average calculated. Hypertension was defined as SBP ≥ 140 mmHg or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg, or as previously diagnosed hypertension identified by a positive response from the participant to the question, "Has a doctor ever told you that you have hypertension?"

Laboratory measurements

An overnight fasting venous specimen was collected in the morning using a vacuum tube containing sodium fluoride for measuring fasting plasma glucose. Plasma glucose was measured using the Hexokinase method (Toshiba TBA-40FR). All the participants with fasting plasma glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/L and <7.0 mmol/L, expect for those with diagnosed diabetes, underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). All control values were consistent with the standards recommended by the medical laboratory of Chongqing Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

According to the 1999 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria, diabetes is defined as the level at which fasting glucose reaches 126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l), or when 2 h postprandial glucose level reaches 200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l), or both [11]. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is defined as the level at which fasting glucose is ≥109 mg/dl (6.1 mmol/l) and <126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l). In our study, subjects were categorized into three groups: diabetes group, which included previously diagnosed diabetes and/or those currently taking antidiabetic drugs and undiagnosed diabetes, detected for the first time during the study; IFG group; normal fasting glucose group.

All investigators and staff successfully completed a two-day training program that familiarized them with the aim of the study, the specific tools and methods.

Statistical analysis

Prevalence estimates for diabetes and IFG were calculated for the overall population and subgroups according to age and gender. Age-standardized prevalence was calculated by way of the direct method using data from the population distribution in China, 2010.

Descriptive data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentage. A Student t-test was used to test differences in the means of continuous variables, and the Chi-square test to test differences in ratios. The analyses were gender-specific. A multinomial logistic regression analysis, using a backward elimination method, was used to examine the association of socio-demographic, family medical history and lifestyle characteristics with the odds of diabetes. P <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All initial data was entered into Epidata software 3.1 versions and Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 18.0 for statistical analyses.

Results

Demographic characteristics

Table 1 presents demographic characteristics of the subjects. Of the 3,721 participants, 1,777 (47.8%) were male and 1,944 (52.2%) were female. Their mean age (SE) was 47.39 (16.7). Significant differences were shown in marital status, education level, occupational level and family income between men and women. The percentage of central obesity and the mean of BMI for women were significantly higher than that of men, while the percentage of smoking, drinking and sedentary life for more than six hours per day of men was significantly greater than that of women. However, no significant differences were noted in terms age, family history of hypertension and diabetes, hypertension, overweight and obesity between men and women.
Table 1

Characteristics of participants in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China

Variables

Male (n = 1777)

Female (n = 1944)

Total

X2/t

P value

Age (%)

     

18-29

319 (18.0)

328 (16.9)

647 (17.4)

3.413

0.637

30-39

328 (18.5)

334 (17.2)

662 (17.8)

40-49

373 (21.0)

437 (22.5)

810 (21.8)

50-59

323 (18.2)

376 (19.3)

699 (18.8)

60-69

252 (14.2)

264 (13.6)

516 (13.9)

>70

182 (10.2)

205 (10.5)

387 (10.4)

Marital status (%)

     

Unmarried

180 (10.1)

125 (6.4)

305 (8.2)

28.143

<0.001

Married

1490 (83.8)

1639 (84.3)

3129 (84.1)

Widowed or divorces

107 (6.0)

180 (9.3)

287 (7.7)

Education level (%)

     

Lower than primary school

745 (41.9)

1083 (55.7)

1828 (49.1)

75.836

<0.001

Junior middle school

575 (32.4)

519 (26.7)

1094 (29.4)

Senior middle school

320 (18.0)

252 (13.0)

572 (15.4)

College and above

137 (7.7)

90 (4.6)

227 (6.1)

Occupation (%)

   

Peasant

936 (52.7)

1090 (56.1)

2026 (54.4)

68.183

<0.001

Laborer

396 (22.3)

252 (13.0)

648 (17.4)

Retiree or House worker

300 (16.9)

455 (23.4)

755 (20.3)

Others

145 (8.2)

147 (7.6)

292 (7.8)

Income (%)

     

Lower than 5000 RMB/Year

249 (14.0)

333 (17.1)

582 (15.6)

501.912

<0.001

5000-9999 RMB/year

529 (29.8)

513 (26.4)

1042 (28.0)

10000-49999 RMB/year

216 (12.2)

158 (8.1)

374 (10.1)

>500000 RMB/year

275 (15.5)

278 (14.3)

553 (14.9)

Refuse to answer

508 (28.6)

662 (34.1)

1170 (31.4)

BMI (means ± SD, kg/m2)

23.0 ± 3.0

23.3 ± 3.3

23.1 ± 3.2

-1.976

0.048

Waist circumference (means ± SD, cm)

78.9 ± 9.2

76.5 ± 9.2

77.6 ± 9.3

8.083

<0.001

Smoking (%)

664 (37.4)

142 (7.3)

806 (20.2)

4.940

<0.001

Drinking (%)

498 (28.0)

199(10.2)

697 (18.7)

1.930

<0.001

Vegetable intake (%)

     

Less than 1 time per day

128 (7.2)

132 (6.8)

260 (7.0)

3.695

0.158

1 or 2 times per day

252(14.2)

237 (12.2)

489 (13.1)

3 times per day

1397 (78.6)

1575 (81.0)

2972 (79.9)

Sedentary lifestyle time per day (%)

     

Less than 3 hours

1066 (60.0)

1240 (63.8)

2306 (61.9)

8.042

0.018

3-6 hours

505 (28.4)

525 (27.0)

1030 (27.7)

More than 6 hours

206 (11.6)

181 (9.3)

387 (10.4)

Family history of hypertension (%)

294 (16.5)

374 (19.2)

668 (18.0)

3.793

0.150

Family history of diabetes (%)

275 (15.5)

284 (14.6)

559 (15.0)

1.558

0.459

Fasting glucose (mean ± SD, mmol/L)

5.5 ± 2.5

5.5 ± 1.7

5.1 ± 2.1

442.4

0.019

Overweight (%)

466 (26.2)

527 (27.1)

988 (26.6)

0.372

0.542

Obesity (%)

101 (5.7)

127 (6.5)

215 (5.8)

1.164

0.281

Central obesity (%)

448 (25.2)

690 (35.5)

1138 (30.6)

46.238

<0.001

Hypertension (%)

524 (29.5)

572 (29.4)

1096 (29.5)

0.002

0.966

Abbreviation: BMI body mass index, SD standard deviation.

Prevalence of diabetes and IFG

The crude prevalence of diabetes and IFG was 8.4% (95% CI, 7.5% - 9.3%) and 9.8% (95% CI, 8.6% - 11.0%), respectively. After standardization of age, based on China’ 2010 census data, the prevalence was 7.6% (95% CI, 6.9% - 8.3%) for diabetes and 9.0% (95% CI, 7.9% -10.1%) for IFG. The age-standardized prevalence estimates of diabetes and IFG were similar for men and women (diabetes: 7.9% vs. 7.4%, X2 = 0.228, p = 0.633; IFG: 8.9% vs. 9.1%, X2 = 0.288, p = 0.592) and the prevalence of diabetes and IFG significantly increased across the age groups (P < 0.001) (Figure 1).Out of the identified cases of diabetes in our study, 54.5% (171/314) were undiagnosed. The ratios of undiagnosed cases to total diabetes cases were: 90.0% (24/26) in the 18-29 age group, 65.0% (20/30) in the 30-39 age group; 56.9% (40/66) in the 40-49 age group, 58.6% (48/78) in the 50-59 age group, 41.1% (27/64) in the 60-69 age group and 23.3% (12/50) in the >70 age group (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose by different age groups and gender.

Figure 2

Age-specific prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes and IFG among participants.

Factors associated with diabetes

On univariate analysis, the following factors were significantly associated with diabetes: age, educational level, marital status, smoking, family history of diabetes obesity, central obesity, and hypertension (Table 2).
Table 2

The results of univariate analysis of the potential risk factors associated with diabetes

Variables

Total number

DM prevalence (%)

OR (95% CI)

P -value

Age

    

18-29

647

4.0

1

 

30-39

662

4.5

1.13 (0.66-1.94)

0.646

40-49

810

8.1

2.12 (1.33-3.38)

0.001

50-59

699

11.2

2.67 (1.69-4.21)

<0.001

60-69

516

12.4

2.96 (1.85-4.74)

<0.001

>70

387

12.9

3.54 (2.12-5.80)

<0.001

Educational level

    

Less than junior middle school

1828

10.5

1

<0.001

≥ Junior middle school

1893

6.4

0.59 (0.47-0.72)

Smoking

    

No

2915

7.7

1

0.002

Yes

806

11.2

1.51 (1.35-1.67)

Family history of diabetes

    

No

3162

7.7

1

 

Yes

559

12.6

1.71 (1.29-2.27)

<0.001

Obesity

    

No

3506

8.2

1

 

Yes

215

12.1

1.54 (1.00-2.36)

0.047

Central obesity

    

No

2583

7.0

1

 

Yes

1138

11.6

1.73 (1.37-2.19)

<0.001

Hypertension

    

No

2625

6

1

 

Yes

1096

14.2

2.59 (2.05-3.27)

<0.001

Marital status

    

Married

3129

8

1

 

Unmarried or widowed or divorces

592

11

1.39 (1.12-1.66)

0.015

Abbreviation: CI confidence intervals, OR odds ratio.

Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that older age, family history of diabetes, central obesity, hypertension, and educational level below junior middle school were all significantly associated with an increased risk of diabetes for both men and women. In addition, smoking was significantly associated with an increased risk of diabetes in men (Table 3).
Table 3

Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for diabetes by gender*

Variable

Male

Female

 

OR (95% CI&)

P value

OR (95% CI&)

P value

Age, per 10-yr increment

1.70 (1.52 - 1.89)

0.004

1.71 (1.47 - 1.95)

0.002

Less than junior middle school

1.21 (1.16 - 1.27)

0.001

1.23 (1.17 - 1.28)

<0.001

Family history of diabetes#

1.51 (1.27 - 1.89)

0.002

1.53 (1.41 - 1.65)

0.001

Central obesity#

2.15 (1.98 - 2.32)

<0.001

2.20 (2.03 - 2.38)

<0.001

Hypertension#

1.74 (1.56 - 1.92)

0.002

1.48 (1.31 - 1.65)

0.021

Smoking#

1.17 (1.04 - 1.30)

0.035

_

*Odds ratios were calculated with the use of multinomial logit models. All covariables were included in the model.

#References were participants without family history of diabetes, not central obesity, not hypertension and no smoking.

& Abbreviation: CI confidence intervals, OR odds ratio.

Discussion

This cross-sectional study revealed that the age-standardized prevalence of diabetes among adults living in TGRR was 7.6%, which was higher than the prevalence among individuals in other cities in China, such as Guangzhou (5.5%) [12], Shanghai (6.7%) [13], Qingdao (6.1%) [14], Haikou (5.3%) [15], and Heilongjiang (7.1%) [16]. The differences between this study and other studies may be due to different environments and lifestyles of the studied subjects.

After the construction of the Three Gorge Dam, great changes took place in the residents’ lifestyles characterized by reduced physical activity due to the loss of arable land and a series of psychological problems due to resettlement, which might be regarded as contributing factors in the development of diabetes [17]. Our study is relevant as it will be useful for further research and strategies aimed at promoting healthy lifestyles in TGRR.

In our study, 54.46% of diabetes cases had been undiagnosed, which means that more than half of the patients did not know they had diabetes before. Our study was in conformity with other studies [1822], which also found a high percentage of undiagnosed cases of diabetes. The low diagnosis rate might be attributable to the silent condition the patients undergo until the development of a complication, lack of awareness and complicated screening and diagnostic methods [18]. Compared to diagnosed cases of diabetes, undiagnosed cases are prone to various complications [19] and are likely to become a huge economic burden to society [23]. Therefore, it is essential to establish regular population-based screening to identify early-stage diabetes and offer early treatment to delay its development and reduce the related complications in TGRR.

In our study, a higher prevalence of IFG (9.0%) was recorded as compared to diabetes (7.6%). Individuals with IFG are more prone to progress to the diabetes stage in the absence of interventional measures. A previous study had reported that the progression rate from IFG to diabetes is approximately 8.8% per year [19]. The high prevalence of IFG in TGRR might be a significant risk factor in the development of diabetes. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct regular screening to identify those individuals with IFG and to provide effective interventional measures to prevent the development of diabetes.

Our study showed that the prevalence of diabetes increased with age, which indicates that aging might contribute to the diabetes epidemic among adults living in TGRR. The increase was similar to other studies in China [12] and other Asian [24], European [25] and American populations [26]. However, it was different from that of some Asian populations in which the prevalence of diabetes reached its peak in the 60-70s then declined thereafter [27]. In addition, it’s important to note that diabetes may no longer be entirely due to old age as 4.0% in 18-29 year-old group, and 4.5% in 30-39 year-old group were found to be diabetic in our study. This means that young people should also be targeted for diabetes prevention.

Similar to previous studies [3, 2830], central obesity and hypertension were identified as risk factors for diabetes in our study. Generalized obesity is significantly associated with diabetes in univariate analysis but failed to attain statistical significance in multivariable analysis. This result could indicate that central obesity is more strongly associated with diabetes than generalized adiposity in adults living in TGRR. The prevalence of central obesity and hypertension were rather high (30.6% and 29.5%) among the study subjects. Therefore, it is essential to manage diabetes together with obesity and hypertension, especially central obesity, in order to reduce the clinical consequences such as coronary heart disease, stroke and peripheral arterial diseases.

Low educational level and family history of diabetes also appeared to be risk factors in our study. Educational level is a good indicator of socioeconomic status, with higher educational level being associated with lower levels of cardiovascular risk factors such as obesity and hypertension [31, 32]. The results of our study pointed to low educational level of residents in TGRR, with half of the participants being lower than primary school. Furthermore, the results revealed that smoking is an independent risk for diabetes in men as shown earlier [3235]. Therefore, it is essential to conduct effective behavioral intervention programs to promote healthy ways of life in citizens, such as peer support on smoking cessation especially for people with lower education level.

This study was the first survey on diabetes and IFG among adults living in TGRR. To ensure the validity of the data collected, we employed standard instruments and protocols together with strict training. In addition, the standard laboratory methods for measuring glucose and blood pressure were used.

However, there were some limitations our study encountered. First, due to the cross-sectional nature of our study, the associations between risk factors and diabetes were not causality. Second, the investigated population was older than the general population in TGRR. Thus, the age-adjusted prevalence of diabetes was lower than the crude prevalence. Finally, 2 h OGTT was conducted only in those subjects whose fasting glucose was ≥ 5.6 mmol/L due to the financial and organizational limitations. The fasting glucose is recommended over OGTT in epidemiological studies and for individual diagnostic purposes because it is easy, convenient and acceptable to subjects, in addition to being reproducible and cost effective. However, the OGTT has the potential to identify individuals who have abnormal glucose that could not be detected by fasting glucose tests [36]. Therefore, the prevalence in our survey might underestimate the real prevalence in TGRR.

Conclusions

In summary, our results indicate that the diabetes has become a major public health problem in TGRR. More troubling is the finding that majority of cases of diabetes are undiagnosed. Furthermore, central obesity and hypertension are highly prevalent and are strongly linked to diabetes. These findings suggest that regular population-based diabetes screening should be established to identify early-stage diabetes, and an integrated health-education program encouraged to boost public awareness of diabetes, risk factors and complications in TGRR.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Chongqing Health and Family Planning Commission (Topic No: 20141027), Chongqing Health Bureau (Topic No: 2012-2-233) 382 and World Health Organization (2012-2013(CND-12-NCD-003578)), and was completed with the assistance of the following units: Disease Control and Prevention Centers of Fengjie County, Wanzhou District and Zhongxian County. We also thank all participants, discussion facilitators and consultants in this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Military Epidemiology, College of Military Prevention, Third Military Medical University
(2)
Chongqing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(3)
Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College

References

  1. Zimmet PZ, Magliano DJ, Herman WH, Shaw JE: Diabetes: a 21st century challenge. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014, 2 (1): 56-64. 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70112-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, Shaw J: IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011, 94 (3): 311-321. 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Li H, Oldenburg B, Chamberlain C, O'Neil A, Xue B, Jolley D, Hall R, Dong Z, Guo Y: Diabetes prevalence and determinants in adults in China mainland from 2000 to 2010: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012, 98 (2): 226-235. 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.05.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. National diabetes research cooperation: A mass survey of diabetes mellitus in a population of 300,000 in 14 provinces and municipalities in China. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 1981, 20 (11): 678-683.Google Scholar
  5. Xu Y, Wang L, He J, Bi Y, Li M, Wang T, Jiang Y, Dai M, Lu J, Xu M, Li Y, Hu N, Li J, Mi S, Chen CS, Li G, Mu Y, Zhao J, Kong L, Chen J, Lai S, Wang W, Zhao W, Ning G: Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults. JAMA. 2013, 310 (9): 948-959. 10.1001/jama.2013.168118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jim CY, Yang FY: Local responses to inundation and de-farming in the reservoir region of the three gorges project (China). Environ Manage. 2006, 38 (4): 618-637. 10.1007/s00267-005-0253-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, Shan Z, Liu J, Tian H, Ji Q, Zhu D, Ge J, Lin L, Chen L, Guo X, Zhao Z, Li Q, Zhou Z, Shan G, He J: Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362 (12): 1090-1101. 10.1056/NEJMoa0908292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kish L: A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. J Am Stat Assoc. 1949, 44 (247): 380-387. 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. World Health Organization: Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. 1997, http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/obesity.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2013Google Scholar
  10. The World Health Organization Western Pacific Region: The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. http://www.wpro.who.int/nutrition/documents/docs/Redefiningobesity.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2013
  11. Roden M: Diabetes mellitus--definition, classification and diagnosis. Acta Med Austriaca. 2004, 31 (5): 156-157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang H, Qiu Q, Tan LL, Liu T, Deng XQ, Chen YM, Chen W, Yu XQ, Hu BJ, Chen WQ: Prevalence and determinants of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose among urban community-dwelling adults in Guangzhou, China. Diabetes Metab. 2009, 35 (5): 378-384. 10.1016/j.diabet.2009.03.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jia WP, Pang C, Chen L, Bao YQ, Lu JX, Lu HJ, Tang JL, Wu YM, Zuo YH, Jiang SY, Xiang KS: Epidemiological characteristics of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in a Chinese adult population: the Shanghai Diabetes Studies, a cross-sectional 3-year follow-up study in Shanghai urban communities. Diabetologia. 2007, 50 (2): 286-292. 10.1007/s00125-006-0503-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong Y, Gao W, Nan H, Yu H, Li F, Duan W, Wang Y, Sun B, Qian R, Tuomilehto J, Qiao Q: Prevalence of Type 2 diabetes in urban and rural Chinese populations in Qingdao, China. Diabet Med. 2005, 22 (10): 1427-1433. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01658.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Xia Z, Wang Z, Cai Q, Yang J, Zhang X, Yang T: Prevalence and risk factors of type 2 diabetes in the adults in Haikou city, Hainan island, China. Iran J Public Health. 2013, 42 (3): 222-230.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Wei W, Liu SY, Zeng FF, Yao SP, Zhang HT, Wan G, Zhong M, Yang Z, Wang BY: Type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in North-China-based rural community adults. Public Health. 2010, 124 (10): 593-601. 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.05.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Garduno-Diaz SD, Khokhar S: Prevalence, risk factors and complications associated with type 2 diabetes in migrant South Asians. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012, 28 (1): 6-24. 10.1002/dmrr.1219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu D, Fu P, Xie J, Chen CS, Yu D, Whelton PK, He J, Gu D: Increasing prevalence and low awareness, treatment and control of diabetes mellitus among Chinese adults: the InterASIA study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008, 81 (2): 250-257. 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.04.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wong KC, Wang Z: Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus of Chinese populations in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006, 73 (2): 126-134. 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.01.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu S, Ming J, Xing Y, Gao B, Yang C, Ji Q, Chen G: Regional differences in diabetes prevalence and awareness between coastal and interior provinces in China: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13 (1): 299-10.1186/1471-2458-13-299.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Mustafa N, Kamarudin NA, Ismail AA, Khir AS, Ismail IS, Musa KI, Kadir KA, Yaacob NA, Ali O, Isa SH, Wan Bebakar WM, Wan Mohamud WN: Prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance and risk factors in urban and rural Malaysia. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34 (6): 1362-1364. 10.2337/dc11-0005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Metelko Z, Pavlic-Renar I, Poljicanin T, Szirovitza L, Turek S: Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Croatia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008, 81 (2): 263-267. 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.04.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chi ZS, Lee ET, Lu M, Keen H, Bennett PH: Vascular disease prevalence in diabetic patients in China: standardised comparison with the 14 centres in the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2001, 44 (Suppl 2): S82-S86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Qiao Q, Hu G, Tuomilehto J, Nakagami T, Balkau B, Borch-Johnsen K, Ramachandran A, Mohan V, Iyer SR, Tominaga M, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, Okubo K, Nagai M, Shibazaki S, Yang Z, Tong Z, Fan Q, Wang B, Chew SK, Tan BY, Heng D, Emmanuel S, Tajima N, Iwamoto Y, Snehalatha C, Vijay V, Kapur A, Dong Y, Nan H, et al: Age- and sex-specific prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in 11 Asian cohorts. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26 (6): 1770-1780. 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tuomileht J, Lindstrom J, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemie S, Hiltunen L, Kivela SL, Gallus G, Garancini MP, Schranz A, Bouter LM, Dekker JM, Heine RJ, Nijpels G, Pajak A, Castell C, Lloveras G, Tresserras R, Pablos-Velasco PL, Martinez-Martin FJ, Rodriguez-Perez F, Gabriel R, Serrano-Rios M, Pladevall M, Muniz J, Eliasson M, Stegmayr B, Lundberg V, Unwin N, George K, Alberti MM, Hayes L, et al: Age- and sex-specific prevalences of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in 13 European cohorts. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26 (1): 61-69. 10.2337/diacare.26.1.61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults–United States, 1999–2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003, 52 (35): 833-837.Google Scholar
  27. Song KH, Nam-Goomg IS, Han SM, Kim MS, Lee EJ, Lee YS, Lee MS, Yoon S, Lee KU, Park JY: Change in prevalence and 6-year incidence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Korean subjects living in a rural area. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007, 78 (3): 378-384. 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.04.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bringer J, Fontaine P, Detournay B, Nachit-Ouinekh F, Brami G, Eschwege E: Prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in the French general population: the INSTANT study. Diabetes Metab. 2009, 35 (1): 25-31. 10.1016/j.diabet.2008.06.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaiser A, Vollenweider P, Waeber G, Marques-Vidal P: Prevalence, awareness and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Switzerland: the CoLaus study. Diabet Med. 2011, 29 (2): 190-197.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitra A, Dewanjee D, Dey B: Mechanistic studies of lifestyle interventions in type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2013, 3 (12): 201-207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Yan LL, Liu K, Daviglus ML, Colangelo LA, Kiefe CI, Sidney S, Matthews KA, Greenland P: Education, 15-year risk factor progression, and coronary artery calcium in young adulthood and early middle age: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study. JAMA. 2006, 295 (15): 1793-1800. 10.1001/jama.295.15.1793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sacerdote C, Ricceri F, Rolandsson O, Baldi I, Chirlaque MD, Feskens E, Bendinelli B, Ardanaz E, Arriola L, Balkau B, Bergmann M, Beulens JW, Boeing H, Clavel-Chapelon F, Crowe F, Lauzon-Guillain B, Forouhi N, Franks PW, Gallo V, Gonzalez C, Halkjaer J, Illner AK, Kaaks R, Key T, Khaw KT, Navarro C, Nilsson PM, Dal Ton SO, Overvad K, Pala V, et al: Lower educational level is a predictor of incident type 2 diabetes in European countries: the EPIC-InterAct study. Int J Epidemiol. 2012, 41 (4): 1162-1173. 10.1093/ije/dys091.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Morimoto A, Ohno Y, Tatsumi Y, Nishigaki Y, Maejima F, Mizuno S, Watanabe S: Risk of smoking and body mass index for incidence of diabetes mellitus in a rural Japanese population. Prev Med. 2012, 54 (5): 341-344. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.02.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Cho NH, Chan JC, Jang HC, Lim S, Kim HL, Choi SH: Cigarette smoking is an independent risk factor for type 2 diabetes: a four-year community-based prospective study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009, 71 (5): 679-685. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03586.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomakos P, Liatis S, Kalopita S, Vlahodimitris I, Stathi C, Katsilambros N, Tentolouris N, Makrilakis K: Cigarette Smoking Is Associated with Prolongation of the QTc Interval Duration in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Endocrinol. 2013, 2013 (2013): 1-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Soulimane S, Simon D, Shaw J, Witte D, Zimmet P, Vol S, Borch-Johnsen K, Magliano D, Vistisen D, Balkau B: HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and the prediction of diabetes: Inter99, AusDiab and D.E.S.I.R. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012, 96 (3): 392-399. 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.06.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1152/prepub

Copyright

© Qi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement