Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Public Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Agreement and concordance between married couples regarding family planning utilization and fertility intention in Dukem, Ethiopia

BMC Public Health201313:903

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-903

Received: 23 April 2013

Accepted: 25 September 2013

Published: 1 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Traditionally, women have been the main respondents for most of knowledge, attitude and practice survey related to family planning and fertility intention. However it is not well known how responses of women about husbands reflect the husband’s attitude and practices. Thus this study is conducted to examine agreement of wife and husband regarding family planning use and fertility desire in Dukem, Ethiopia.

Methods

A community based cross sectional survey was conducted on 422 married couple’s in Dukem town, central Ethiopia which were selected by using systematic sampling method. The study was conducted from November, 2010 to December, 2010. Data pertaining to fertility intentions and contraception was collected and the level of agreement (kappa statistics) between husbands and wives was computed.

Result

The observed concordance was 71.6% for ideal family size, 94.9% for contraceptive attitude, 95.9% for fertility desire, and 99.7% for report of number of currently living children. The unadjusted kappa statistic varied from 0.61(p<=0.000) for contraceptive attitude to high of 0.99(P<=0.000) for number of living children, for ideal family size 0.63(P<=0.000), fertility desire 0.91(P<=0.000), ever use of contraceptive 0.84(P<=0.000) and current use of contraceptive 0.87(P<=0.000) having kappa values in between. Overall greater degree of agreement was observed for reproductive health events as compared to family planning attitudes and intentions.

Conclusion

In surveys pertaining to reproductive health events, the wife’s response may be taken as proxy for the couple’s response, but for assessing family planning attitudes and intentions, may require collecting information from husbands and wives separately.

Background

Traditionally, women have been respondent for the most of knowledge, attitude and practice survey related to family planning and fertility intentions [1].

However, it has been now realized that programs that exclusively focus on either men or women may fail because most sexual, family planning, and child bearing decision are made or may potentially be able to be made by both partners together and the response by one of them may not reflect the reality [1, 2].

Moreover, available studies show that in many developing countries male often dominate when any important decision are taken in the family, such as reproduction, family size, and contraceptive use [3, 58].

Furthermore, the level of spousal agreement regarding fertility and family planning remains an important area for utilization of reproductive service. Although high concurrence would be expected because of daily partner contact and common living conditions, cross national studies of couple concurrence on contraceptive methods use show frequent discrepancies between husbands and wives reports [4, 912].

Thus this study examines agreement between wife and husband on family planning use and fertility intention in Dukem central Ethiopia.

Methods

Design and study area

Community based Cross-sectional study was conducted in Dukem town, central Ethiopia from November, 2010 to December, 2010. Dukem town is 37 km away to south east of the capital of Addis Ababa and is divided into four kebeles1 The town’s total population is 44,009 of which 24,313(55%) are males and 19,696(45%) are females.

Study population and sampling procedure

The study population comprises married couples aged 15–49 residing in Dukem town that was selected by using systematic random sampling techniques.

Sample size was calculated using single proportion formula as follows;
n = Z α / 2 2 p 1 p d 2

Where

n=the desired sample size.

p=proportion of agreement of couples in sub-Saharan countries on contraceptive use 47%-82% take the minimum proportion [13].

Z α/2= critical value at 95% confidence level of certainty (1.96).

d= the margin error between the sample and the population =5%.

using the above formula sample size for single population proportion the desired sample size is 383.considering non response rate of 10% the total sample size used for the study was 422 married couples.

As shown in (Figure 1) the sample was determined proportional to the size of the total house hold population of each kebele. Systematic sampling method was used to select the households from each kebele, where the sampling interval were the total number of households in each kebele divided by the corresponding number of households to be interviewed in each kebele.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of sampling procedure.

The first household interviewed was determined from the kebele house number register using lottery method. The next household was identified by systematically adding the number of interval to the preceding one. If more than one eligible respondent were found in the selected household, only one respondent was chosen by lottery method. In cases where no eligible is identified in the selected household, the interviewer was moving to the next household.

Data were collected using pretested structured questionnaire, which was administered by the trained data collectors. The interviews were conducted at the respondent’s home and both husband and wives were interviewed on the same day but separately (Figure 1).

Data analysis

Data were entered into Epi info 3.5.1 and analyzed using SPSS 16 soft ware package. First frequencies of the overall distribution of the variables under study were done. Kappa statistics was done to see the level of agreement of couples on family planning utilization and fertility desire.

As observed by others finding an adequate measure for distinguishing between spousal concordance that occurs by chance and actual agreement are methodological difficulty. In addition the Kappa statistics is influenced by the distributions of data across the categories that are used. As Kappa statistics may be influenced by the presence of more than two categories and by high prevalence of the outcome under consideration, we used weighted kappa and prevalence adjusted kappa wherever appropriate [14, 15].

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the school of public health, and Addis Ababa University College of health science ethical committee. A formal letter was also submitted to all the concerned bodies to obtain their co-operation. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all study participants after explaining the purpose of the study. The participation was voluntarily and they could withdraw from the study at any time without explanation. Confidentiality was assured and no personality identifying details were recorded.

Result

Socio demographic characteristics

A total of 422 couples were interviewed. The age range for wives was from 16 to 46 years with mean age of 27.9 and for husband was from 20 to 53 years with mean age of 32.8 years. As indicated in Table 1, majority of men, 383(90.8%) and the women 326(77.2%) reported attending formal education. Most of those who reported attending formal education, 321(76.1%) of men and 297(70.3%) of women attended elementary and high school [grade 10 and below]. About 21% of women and 9% of men were illiterate.
Table 1

Socio demographic characteristics of married couples in Dukem town, 2010 (n=422)

  

Wife

Husband

Characteristics

 

No

%

No

%

Religion

Orthodox

358

84.8

358

84.8

 

Protestant

56

13.3

54

12.8

 

Muslim

6

1.4

7

1.7

 

Catholic

2

.5

3

.7

 

Total

422

100.0

422

100.0

Ethnicity

Oromo

292

69.2

289

68.5

 

Amhara

120

28.4

112

26.5

 

Tigre

2

.5

8

1.9

 

Gurage

7

1.7

10

2.4

 

Others

1

.2

3

.7

 

Total

422

100.0

422

100.0

Education

Illiterate

87

20.6

36

8.5

 

Read & write

9

2.1

3

.7

 

Elementary

120

28.4

78

18.5

 

Junior

130

30.8

140

33.2

 

High school

47

11.1

103

24.4

 

Preparatory

21

5.0

45

10.7

 

Higher education

8

1.9

17

4.0

 

Total

422

100.0

422

100.0

Reproductive history

More than half 53.1% of women were married at ages less than 19 years, while only 11.8% men did so. The minimum age at marriage reported for women was 13 years and for men was 15 years. The mean age at marriage was 19.7 and 24.6, and standard deviation 3.9 & 4.7 for women & men respectively.

386(91.5%) had ever born children and the rest did not have. As shown in Figure 2 Out of this about 56.7% had one to two children, 30.3% had three to four children, 7.8% of them had five to six children, and the rest 5.2% had more than six children ever born and the mean number of ever born children for a couple was 2.7.
Figure 2

Number of ever born and alive children for married couples in Dukem town, 2010.

Among these ever born children 58.5% one to two children, about 31.1% three-four children, 3.5% five to six children, and 3.9% more than six children respectively were alive children. The mean number of alive children was 2.5 (Figure 2).

About 65.9% of the respondents wanted to have additional children and the rest did not. More than half (52.6%) of a couple wanted to have three to four children, while about one third of couple wanted to have one to two children. The mean of ideal child desire was 3.4 children, where 1.9 was for male child and 1.5 was for female child. The minimum was 1 child and the maximum was 12 children (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Number of children desired by married couples in Dukem town, 2010(n=422).

Agreement level between husband and wife regarding contraceptive practice, attitude and fertility desire

Table 2 shows proportional agreement of the number of living children as reported by husbands and wives. Overall in 99.7%(95% CI: 99.2 to 100.2%) of cases, both partners reported the same number of living children and the kappa statistic was 0.99(p<=0.000), which corresponds to excellent agreement. In one case where there was a difference in reported number of children, it was husband who reported more number of children.
Table 2

Agreement level between husband and wife regarding contraceptive practice, attitude and fertility desire in Dukem town, 2010/11 (n=422)

Ever use of contraception

Husband

  

Wife

No (%)

Yes (%)

Total

kappa

No

61(14.5)

3(0.7)

64(15.2)

0.84

Yes

16(3.8)

342(81)

358(84.8)

 

Total

77(18.3)

345(81.7)

422(100)

 

Current use of contraceptive

No

Yes

Total

 

No

77(18.2)

6(1.4)

83(19.7)

0.87

Yes

12(2.8)

327(77.5)

339(80.3)

 

Total

89(21.1)

333(78.9)

422(100)

 

Contraceptive attitude

Disapprove

Approve

Total

 

Disapprove

19(4.5)

6(1.4)

25(5.9)

0.61

Approve

16(3.8)

381(90.3)

397(94.1)

 

Total

35(8.3)

387(91.7)

422(100)

 

Fertility desire

Want no more

Want more

Total

 

Want no more

131(31)

13(3.1)

144(34.1)

0.91

Want more

4(0.9)

274(64.9)

278(65.8)

 

Total

135(31.9)

287(68)

422(100)

 

Current living children

    

No

0(0.0)

1(0.3)

1(0.3)

0.99

Yes

0(0.0)

385(99.7)

385(99.7)

 

Total

0(0.0)

386(100)

386(100)

 

Ideal family size

    

No

0(0.0)

61(14.5)

61(14.5)

0.63

Yes

59(13.9)

302(71.2)

361(85.5)

 

Total

59(13.9)

363(86.0)

422(100)

 

As indicated in Table 2, proportional agreement for ever use of contraception irrespective of the method showed 95.5%(95% CI: 94.5% to 96.5%) overall agreement between husbands and wives. The kappa statistic was 0.84(P<=0.000), which corresponds to excellent agreement. Ever use of contraception was reported by sixteen 3.8% wives while husbands reported that they had never used any contraception. In most of the cases, the wives had taken oral pills and it could be that they did not inform their husbands regarding this. Ever use of contraception was reported by three 0.7% husbands when wives reported otherwise. This difference may be attributable to differences of perception between spouses regarding traditional methods or may be indicative of existence of multiple sexual partners condom use.

As shown in Table 2 Current use of contraception as reported by husbands and wives showed 95.7%(95% CI 94.7 to 96.7%) over all agreement. The kappa statistic was 0.87(P<=0.000), which corresponds to excellent agreement. Current use of contraception was reported by twelve 2.8% wives while the husband reported using none. Six 1.4% husbands reported current use of contraception while their wives did not. It may be inferred that there is covert contraceptive use by the couples.

Proportional agreement for fertility desire showed agreement between husband and wives is 95.9%(95% CI: 94.01 to 97.8%) of cases, 31% of couples wanting no more children and 65.9% wanting more children. The kappa statistic was 0.91(P<=0.000). The disagreement was unevenly divided across the remaining two cells, with 4 cases where the wife desired more children while the husband did not and 13 cases where the husband desired more children but wives did not.

Proportional agreement of ideal family size showed that in 71.6%(95% CI: 67 to 76%) of cases there was agreement between husband and wife. The kappa statistics was 0.63(P-value 0.000). In 14.5% of cases, the husband wanted more children than the wife did, while in 13.9% of cases the wife wanted more children than the husband did.

Cross tabulation of attitude towards contraception shows that there was 94.8%(95% CI: 92.8 to 97%) overall agreement between husbands and wives in attitude toward contraception; both partners approved of contraception in 90.3% cases. The unadjusted kappa statistic was 0.6(P<=0.000) which corresponds to good agreement. In 3.8% of cases, wives approved of contraception whereas husbands did not, and in 1.4% of cases, husbands approved of contraception where as wives did not.

Discussion

This community based study used information from both husband and wife to assess the agreement between married couples regarding family planning utilization and fertility desire in Dukem town.

The age range for wives was from 16 to 46 years with mean age of 27.9 and for husband was from 20 to 53 years with mean of 32.8 years. This mean age difference is due to the fact that only women with age range of 15–49 were included in the study and also mostly women married husband elder than themselves [1618].

The level of spousal agreement regarding fertility and family planning remains an important area for utilization of reproductive service. For this study on current reproductive attitude and behavior among the couples with both partners in their first marriage only one valid response can be recorded for a couple for objective events like number of children born and current use of contraception. Any differences indicate response error on the part of one spouse or both. Determining which respondent give the correct response is usually impossible because validation studies of these indices are lacking. The minor differences in objective events in the present study can be explained by the male dominated culture of this study population [1922].

In this study, the observed agreement between husbands and wives regarding reporting of reproductive health events and family planning attitudes and intentions varied from moderate 71.6%(95% CI:67.3 to 75.9) for ideal family size to a high of 99.7%(95% CI:99.2 to 100.2%) for a number of currently living children. But the unadjusted kappa statistic varied from 0.61(P<=0.000) for contraceptive attitude to 0.997(P<=0.000) for a number of living children.

In agreement with this study, research from Turkey reported that spousal reports on most fertility and contraceptive use measures demonstrated moderate to high concordance, where as reports of approval of family planning showed only fair concordance [4, 2326].

This study revealed that high level of agreement in reporting the number of living children between husbands and wives. A high level of agreement in number of living children was also reported by a study done in rural Maharashtra, India where only 0.4% disagreement was observed for number of currently living sons and daughters. They also concluded that women reported live births more accurately than men [2729].

In this study current use of contraception as reported by husbands and wives showed 95.7%(95% CI 94.7 to 96.7%) over all agreement. The kappa statistic was 0.87(P<=0.000), which corresponds to excellent agreement. In a study using data from six demographic and health surveys of sub Saharan Africa, contraceptive use agreement ranged from 47% to 82%, but among couples in whom one or both reported use, the both category represented less than half in all nations except Zimbabwe [13, 30].

Whereas discrepancies in the reporting of events indicate reporting errors on the part of one or both spouses, differences of attitudes and intentions are expected because these are subjective indicators.

Available studies show that in many developing countries, males often dominate in decision making in the family, including in issues related to reproduction, family size and contraceptive use. Research in Kenya suggests that contraception is 2–3 times more likely to be used when husbands, rather than wives, want to cease childbearing [31, 32].

Male involvement not only helps in making a contraceptive more acceptable, but also makes its effective use and continuation more likely. On the other hand, even if the wife wants to use a contraceptive, she may not be able to use it or may be forced to discontinue the method if the husband disapproves of contraception. In study conducted in Indonesia, husband’s approval was the most important determinant of contraceptive use [33].

Conclusion

Overall, a greater degree of agreement was observed for reproductive health events as compared to family planning attitudes and intentions. The latter are more subjective outcomes and can be expected to vary among spouses. Thus, we can infer that for reproductive health events, wives responses can be taken as proxy for the couple’s response but family planning attitudes and intentions may require collection of information both from husbands and wives.

Endnote

aKebele is the smallest administrative unit in Ethiopia.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

This study was financially supported by the United Nation Population Fund. We would like to acknowledge with gratitude all the individuals who facilitated the implementation of study. We would like to extend our gratitude to all study participants for their time and willingness to take part in the study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wolaita Sodo University
(2)
School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University

References

  1. Yadav K, Singh B, Goswami K: Agreement and concordance regarding reproductive intentions and contraception between husbands and wives in rural ballabgarh, India. Indian J Community Med. 2010, 35 (1): 19-23. 10.4103/0970-0218.62548.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Yadav K, Singh B, Goswami K: Unmet family planning need: differences and levels of agreement between husband-wife, haryana. India. Indian J Community Med. 2009, 34 (3): 188-191. 10.4103/0970-0218.55281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. UNFPA: Male Involvement in Reproductive Health, Including Family planning and Sexual Health. Technical Report. 1995, New York: UNFPA, 28:Google Scholar
  4. Kulczycki A: Husband-wife agreement, power relations and contraceptive use in Turkey. International Family Planning Perspective. 2008, 34 (3): 127-137. 10.1363/3412708.Google Scholar
  5. Akinrinola B, Sasheela S: Couples Fertility and contraception Decision Making in Developing Countries: Hearing the Man’s Voice. International Family Planning prespective. 1998, 24 (1): 15-24. 10.2307/2991915.Google Scholar
  6. Toure L: Male Involvement in Family Planning: a Review of Programmes and Selected Programme Initiatives in Africa. 1996, [Accessed date 5/8/11] http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNABY584.pdf Google Scholar
  7. Tolassa Y: The role of men in family planning in a rural community of western Ethiopia. 2004, Addis Ababa University: Thesis (un published)Google Scholar
  8. Orji EO, Ojofeitimi EO, Olanrewaju BA: The role of men in family planning decision-making in rural and urban Nigeria. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007, 12 (1): 70-75. 10.1080/13625180600983108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zewudu W, Sibanda A, Dennis P: The proximate determinants of the decline to below replacement fertility in Addis Ababa. Studies in FP. 2003, 34 (1): 1-7.Google Scholar
  10. Haregewoin C, Emebet M: Towards Gender equality in Ethiopia. 2003, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency: A Profile of Gender RelationsGoogle Scholar
  11. Assefa H, Betermariam B, Dennis PH: Household organization women’s Autonomy, & contraceptive Behavior in southern Ethiopia. Studies in Fp. 1999, 30 (34): 302-314.Google Scholar
  12. Central Statistical Authority, and ORC MACRO: Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2005. 2006, Addis Ababa and Maryland: CSA and ORC MacroGoogle Scholar
  13. Becker S, Hossain MB, Thomson E: Disagreement in spousal reports of current contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa. J Biosoc Sci. 2006, 38 (6): 779-796. 10.1017/S0021932005001069.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bankole A, Singh S: Couples fertility and contraceptive decision making in developing countries hearing men’s voice. Int Fam Plan perspect. 1998, 24: 15-24. 10.2307/2991915.Google Scholar
  15. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB: Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiology. 1993, 46: 39-42.Google Scholar
  16. Bongaarts J, Potter RC: Fertility, Biology and Behavior: An Analysis of the Proximate Determinants of Fertility. 1983, New York and London : New york Academic pressGoogle Scholar
  17. Cleland J, Wilson C: Demand Theories of Fertility Transition: an Iconoclastic View. Popul Stud. 1987, 41 (4): 5-30.Google Scholar
  18. Bongaarts J: Trends in unwanted childbearing in the developing world. Stud Fam Plann. 1997, 28 (4): 267-277. 10.2307/2137858.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pebley R, Delgado H, Brinemann E: Fertility Desires and Child Mortality among Guatemalan Women. Studies in family Planning. 1989, 10 (4): 129-136.Google Scholar
  20. Short ES, Kiros G: Husbands, Wives, sons and Daughters Fertility Preferences and the Demand for Contraception in Ethiopia. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2002, 21: 377-402. 10.1023/A:1021185812984.Google Scholar
  21. Mohammod N, Ringheim K: Knowledge, Approval and Communication about family planning as correlates of desired fertility among spouses in Pakistan. International Family Planning perspective. 1997, 23 (3): 122-129. 10.2307/2950768.Google Scholar
  22. Gupta N, Katende C, Bessinger R: Association of Mass Media Exposure with Family Planning Attitudes and Practices in Uganda. Stud Fam Plann. 2003, 34 (1): 19-31. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00019.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Biruk T, Michelle JH: Covert contraceptive use and discordant fertility preferences among Ethiopian Couples. 2007, [Accessed date 7/3/11] http://paa2010.princeton.edu/papers/100743 Google Scholar
  24. Freedman R, Blanc AK: Fertility Transition: an update. International Family Planning Perspectives. 1992, 18 (2): 44-50. 10.2307/2133392. 72Google Scholar
  25. Kirk D, Pillet P: Fertility levels, trends and differentials in sub- Saharan Africa in the 1980s and 1990s. Stud Fam Plann. 1998, 29 (1): 1-22. 10.2307/172178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Antenanane K: Community Based Family Planning Services: A PerformanceAssessment of the Jimma FP CBD Projec. Ethiopian Journal of Health development. 1997, 11 (1): 1-5.Google Scholar
  27. Becker S, Costenbader E: Husbands’ and wives’ reports of contraceptive use. Stud Fam Plann. 2001, 32 (2): 111-129. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00111.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. David O: Communication and Decision-Making Factors Influencing Couples Interest in Family Planning and Reproductive Health Behaviours in Nigeria. Stud Tribes Tribals. 2008, 6 (2): 99-103.Google Scholar
  29. Vlassoff C, Vlassoff M: Misreporting in rural fertility data: an analysis of husband-wife disagreement. J Biosoc Sci. 1978, 10 (4): 437-444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Assefa H, Tekleab M, Misganaw F: Family planning in Ethiopia. Epidemiology and Ecology of Health and Disease in Ethiopia. Edited by: Yemane B, Damen H, Kloos H. 2006, Addis Ababa: Shama BooksGoogle Scholar
  31. Central Statistical Authority: The1990 National Family and Fertility Survey. 1993, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Central Statistical AuthorityGoogle Scholar
  32. Dodoo FN: Men matter: additive and interactive gendered preferences and reproductive behavior in Kenya. Demography. 1998, 35 (2): 229-242. 10.2307/3004054.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Joesoef MR, Baughman AL, Utomo B: Husband’s approval of contraceptive use in metropolitan Indonesia: program implications. Stud Fam Plann. 1988, 19 (3): 162-168. 10.2307/1966751.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/903/prepub

Copyright

© Diro and Afework; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement