Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Public Health

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Acceptability of early infant male circumcision among chinese parents: strategy implications of HIV prevention for china

BMC Public Health201212:738

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-738

Received: 12 May 2012

Accepted: 31 August 2012

Published: 4 September 2012

Abstract

Background

Recent evidence has confirmed that circumcision can be performed as a preventive strategy for HIV and early infant male circumcision (EIMC) is regarded to be safer than circumcision in adulthood; however, limited data are available in the literature about EIMC in China. Therefore, the present study was designed to determine the willingness and attitudes of Chinese parents on newborn male circumcision so as to provide data for exploring the feasibility of implementing EIMC as an HIV prevention strategy in China.

Methods

Simple random sampling was used to draw participants from parents who had a newborn son delivered at Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, which is affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, between March and December 2010. A questionnaire was used to determine general medical knowledge or information about circumcision, attitudes about EIMC, and level of decision-making on circumcision for the newborn son.

Results

Data derived from 558 responses were analyzed and the ratio of respondents was 56.3% for fathers and 43.6% for mothers. Of the respondents, 34.4% agreed to circumcise their newborn son, and the level of agreement was 3.25 ± 1.17 (range, 1–5 with “1” being “reluctantly agree” and “5” being “very strongly agree”). The major reason for EIMC was for health (44.8%), followed by doctor’s advice (31.2%). The major reason not to agree to EIMC was concern about pain (50.5%), followed by the risk of the procedure (23.5%).

Conclusion

The willingness and acceptability of EIMC in China is low and the parents of newborn sons are usually not very affirmative when making a decision on such a procedure, suggesting that significant effort will be needed if EIMC is to be implemented as an HIV prevention strategy for China.

Keywords

Early infant male circumcisionChineseAIDSPrevention

Background

The results from three randomized controlled clinical trials conducted in Africa confirmed that male circumcision (MC) lowers the risk of HIV acquisition by 55%-76% in heterosexual men [13]. Based on the evidence, the WHO/UNAIDS has recommended a rapid implementation of MC in countries with a high prevalence of HIV to maximize intervention effectiveness at the population level [4]. To ensure that this protective effect is sustained the WHO/UNAIDS also recommend early infant male circumcision (EIMC) [4]. Boys circumcised during the first month of life have significantly lower frequencies of urinary tract infections and bacteremia compared with uncircumcised boys, and serious complications are rare [5, 6]. Furthermore, EIMC is also considered to be simpler and safer than circumcision in adulthood, with a lower risk for surgical errors, infections, and other adverse effects [7]. Reports from some Africa countries have also provided evidence showing that EIMC has high acceptability for HIV/AIDS prevention [810].

Although the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in China is currently low, the annual morbidity and mortality rates have exhibited upward tendencies since 2003, and the HIV/AIDS epidemic is spreading from high-risk groups to the general population as a result of sexual transmission [11, 12]. In recent years, the proportion of reported HIV/AIDS cases in China accounted for by homosexual and heterosexual transmission has increased year after year. The proportion of cases of HIV resulting from sexual transmission increased from 33.1% in 2006 to 76.3% in 2011, and the fraction arising from heterosexual transmission rose from 30.6% in 2006 to 53.8% in 2010 [11]. Because preventing HIV infection is critical to control and ultimately bring an end to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, effective and more accessible intervention strategies, such as EIMC, are urgently needed in China. Additionally, more widespread use of MC could significantly improve the cervical cancer rate due to persistent high-risk HPV infections, a major health problem in Chinese women because evidence has shown that MC can protect against HPV infections and related diseases in men and women [13]. However, only 2.66% of men are circumcised in China usually because of a tight foreskin; circumcision is generally performed in adulthood or childhood, but not at the time of birth [14]. The willingness and acceptability of EIMC among Chinese parents is unknown given a lack of history and cultural norms endorsing neonatal and adult circumcision. Therefore, the present study was designed to determine the willingness and attitudes of Chinese parents on circumcision in newborn males so as to provide data for exploring the feasibility of implementing EIMC as an HIV prevention strategy in China.

Methods

This study was conducted at the Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, which is affiliated to the Nanjing Medical University, between March and December in 2010 and approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (FYLL1012). The study participants were parents who had a newborn son delivered at the hospital. The inclusion criteria were Chinese ethnicity and basic Chinese literacy. The participants who were foreigners, or Chinese who declined to participate in the study, or Chinese who could not complete the questionnaire were excluded. A simple random sampling method was used to draw participants, i.e., by drawing a lot from an opaque bag to decide whether or not the participant was to be interviewed. Informed written consent was obtained from the participants after explaining that the investigation involved circumcision and health. The survey was anonymous and self-administered. The questionnaire items were developed from general medical knowledge or information about circumcision, attitudes regarding EIMC, and the level of decision-making on circumcision for the newborn son. Questions were presented in a multiple choice or yes/no format. Other variables included age, level of education, socio-economic status, religion, and the relationship with the newborn son (mother or father), as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Respondents’ demographics (n = 558)

Characteristic

 

Age of the respondent (years)

 

 Father

30.6 ± 3.6

 Mother

29.4 ± 3.4

Family income per year*

n (%)

 < 40000 RMB (6250 USD)

154 (27.6)

 40000-90000 RMB (6250–14062 USD)

298 (53.4)

 >90000 RMB (14062 USD)

106 (19.0)

Religion background

 

 None

506 (90.7)

 Buddhism

40 (7.2)

 Christianity

10 (1.8)

 Islam

2 (0.4)

Relationship between the respondent and neonate

 

 Father

314 (56.3)

 Mother

244 (43.8)

Educational degree (mother)

 

 Primary or junior high school only

38 (6.8)

 High school

80 (14.3)

 College or university

382 (68.5)

 Masters or greater education

58 (10.4)

Educational degree (father)

 

 Primary or junior high school only

30 (5.4)

 High school

78(14.0)

 College or university

370(66.3)

 Masters or greater education

80(14.3)

* The median annual income per person in 2011 in China was 19118 RMB (2987 USD).

Preliminary pre-testing was carried out on a group of 30 parents to ensure that the questionnaire items were valid and could be understood. Some of the question items were modified by the feedback obtained. The layout of the print and the arrangement of the questionnaire were designed to be easily read and answered by the participants. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive ratings were used for individual questionnaire items, except for the level of agreement regarding circumcision, which was presented as the mean + standard deviation. The chi-square test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used to evaluate the relationship among variables. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 2865 subjects were asked to participate in the current study; 435 declined and 2430 agreed to participate. A sample size of 810 was drawn from the population of 2430, based on a 1:3 sampling ratio, which accounts for about 5% of male neonates in Nanjing city per year. All incomplete (201) and unacceptable responses (51) were excluded. Of the participants, 52.1% were fathers and 47.9% were mothers, with average ages of 29.3 ± 4.1 and 27.8 ± 3.9 years, respectively. The majority of participants (94.2%) had no religious preference. Finally, the data derived from 558 responses were analyzed, with a response rate of 68.9% (558/810). The ratio of the respondents in the final analysis was 56.3% for fathers and 43.6% for mothers, with average ages of 30.6 ± 3.6 and 29.4 ± 3.4 years, respectively. For all the respondents in the final analysis, 90.2% had no religious preference, and most of the participants had a college or higher education. The characteristics of the respondents are shown in Table 1. A majority of respondents considered MC to have health benefits (91.0%), as dangerous (22.9%), to be painful (43.4%), and having potential to enhance sexual function (58.4%) (Table 2).
Table 2

Results of the survey (n= 558)

Questions

Response, n (%)

What do you think about circumcision? (multiple choice)

 

 Health beneficial

508 (91.0)

 Dangerous

128 (22.9)

 Painful

242 (43.4)

 Enhances sexual function

326 (58.4)

 Necessary

190 (34.1)

Do you agree to EIMC?

 

 Yes

192 (34.4)

 No

366 (65.6)

If agreeing to EIMC, who has the final say?

 

 Father

128 (66.7)

 Mather

56 (29.2)

 Others

8 (4.1)

Reasons for agreeing to EIMC

 

 Religion

2 (1.0)

 Mother’s choice

12 (6.3)

 Father’s choice

11 (5.7)

 Doctor’s advice

61 (31.8)

 For health

105 (54.7)

 Enhances sexual function

1 (0.5)

Reasons for not agreeing to EIMC

 

 Pain

185 (50.5)

 Risky

86 (23.5)

 Bad cosmetics

41 (11.2)

 Other

54 (14.8)

Have you had ever considered circumcising your son in the future?

 

 Yes

200 (35.8)

 No

358 (64.2)

Best age for childhood circumcision

 

 Neonatal period

14 (7.0)

 1 month −1 year

52 (26.0)

 1-3 years

40 (20.0)

 3-5 years

26 (13.0)

 > 5 years

68 (34.0)

Are you in agreement regarding EIMC?

 

 Yes

338 (60.6)

 No

50 (9.0)

 One parent was not involved

170 (30.5)

Where did you get information on circumcision?

 

 Medical workers

228 (40.8)

 Online or other media

194 (34.7)

 Others

136 (24.5)

Have you had ever consulted medical workers for your son’s circumcision?

 

 Yes

124 (22.2)

 No

434 (77.8)

Do you think that medical workers have given you sufficient information regarding circumcision?

 

 Yes

178 (31.9)

 No

380 (68.1)

Do the medical workers respect your decision regarding circumcision?

 

 Yes

500 (89.6)

 No

58 (10.4)

Do you desire information on the effect of circumcision on health?

 

 Yes

470 (84.2)

 No

88 (15.8)

Only 34.4% of the respondents agreed to EIMC, and the level of agreement was 3.25 ± 1.17 (range, 1–5 with “1” being “reluctantly agree” and “5” being “very strongly agree”). A significantly higher proportion of fathers compared to mothers agreed to circumcise their newborn sons (40.8% vs. 26.2%; χ 2 = 12.853, P = 0.008). For those who agreed to EIMC, most (66.7%) regarded the father to have the final say. Health, doctor’s advice, and religion were regarded as the major reasons for EIMC in 54.8%, 31.2%, and 1.1% of the parents, respectively. For those who did not agree to EIMC, the major reason was concern about pain (50.5%), followed by the risk of the procedure (23.5%). Most parents (60.6%) were in agreement regarding circumcision of their newborn son. The family income and the level of education of the parents were not associated with agreement regarding EIMC (P = 0.068 for family income; P = 0.064 for mother’s education, and P = 0.334 for father’s education). We also observed that only 35.8% of the parents considered circumcision for their sons in the future; 7% of the parents thought the best time for circumcision was during the neonatal period, and most of the parents (74.0%) believed that the best age for the procedure was after 1 year of age.

When investigating the information on circumcision, 40.8% of those surveyed claimed that they received such information from medical workers and 34.7% through online sources or other media. Most of the respondents (84.2%) desired to know the effects of circumcision on health. Unfortunately, 68.1% of the subjects considered that the medical workers did not provide them with enough information regarding circumcision. All of the results are summarized in Table 2.

Discussion

Current scientific evidence has convincingly shown that MC is associated with enormous public health benefits, including protection from sexually transmitted HIV, HPV, syphilis, and chancroid, and the penile and prostate cancer rate [15]. Studies of EIMC in countries where it is commonly practiced have consistently shown very low complication rates (< 1%), and a recent review of circumcision complications in pediatric patients concluded that the procedure was safest when performed within the first month of life [16, 17]. Therefore, infancy is considered to be the ideal time to perform a circumcision. However, being remarkably different from Western Europe, North America, or the Middle East, where EIMC is widespread by tradition or as a religious ritual, China lacks the history and cultural norms endorsing circumcision. In China, the nation with the largest population in the world, circumcision is generally treated as a selective medical intervention to treat some diseases; only 2.66% of males have been circumcised, and EIMC is not a traditional practice, except among Muslims, who account for < 3% of the population [14].

The culture of circumcision in China is not well understood. The present study is the first to survey parents’ opinions about EIMC in China. In this study, approximately one-third of parents reported that they would agree to circumcise their newborn son; however, the parents were generally not very affirmative and some were not in agreement when making such a decision, suggesting great difficulties in the implementation of EIMC in China. In Chinese traditional culture, it is believed that the body, hair, and skin should not be self-mutilated because they were borne by parents and it is the first step of filial piety. Such traditional beliefs might make people more reluctant to excise a part of the body unless necessary. Although it is difficult to gauge how these traditional perceptions would affect decisions regarding circumcision, such perceptions have probably contributed to the lack of tradition and motivation for circumcision in China. Nonetheless, retention of the prepuce is not regarded as crucial to one’s ethnic identity amongst Chinese; thus, it is likely that traditional beliefs can be changed by promoting education on the health benefits of MC. Modern propaganda, including the internet and television, provides a convenient medium for such education. Furthermore, among those respondents in the current study who considered circumcision for their sons in the future (35.8%), most (74.0%) regarded > 1 year of age to be the best age to undergo circumcision and only 7% thought the neonatal period to be the best time; this confirms the difficulties in implementing EIMC. In a survey from South Korea [18], another Asian country which also lacks a history and tradition of circumcision, it was shown that the circumcision rate is as high as 60% in the entire population and > 90% among high school boys; however, the peak age of circumcision is 9–14 years, and the EIMC rate is also very low [18]. In another study from Zambia, a southern African country with an HIV prevalence of 14% where EIMC has been implemented as a long-term prevention strategy for HIV, it was reported that the acceptability of EIMC is challenged by a fear of negative outcomes, concerns about pain, and issues involving cultural identity [19]. All of these findings, combined with our results, suggest that it will be difficult to implement EIMC in countries without a tradition of circumcision based on culture or religion; conducting awareness campaigns on EIMC will be necessary in such countries to address this issue. Such campaigns could be launched through widespread propaganda via the internet, newspapers, and popular lectures; however, education efforts targeting the parents of newborns by medical workers might be more effective. In the current study, 68% of the respondents commented that medical workers did not give them sufficient information about circumcision, implying that most of the respondents desired to understand EIMC from medical workers in hospitals. This suggests that hospitals might be ideal places to educate the parents of newborn infants while awaiting delivery. This could be achieved by face-to-face education with medical workers or short videos on televisions in the ward. We also observed that the major reason for consenting to EIMC was for health (54.7%), followed by doctor’s advice (31.8%), suggesting that the medical benefits are the primary motivation for EIMC in China. This may be related to an expectation of beneficial effects on health, as suggested by the survey result that 91.0% of respondents considered circumcision to be healthy. The major reason for EIMC unwillingness among parents was pain (50.5%) and the risk (23.5%) of circumcision, which was somewhat different from findings from South Korea, where pain (42.8%) and bad cosmetics (22.5%) were of greatest concern [18]. In fact, EIMC is generally performed under anesthesia worldwide. Combining topical petroleum gel with the dorsal penile nerve block or a subcutaneous ring block is an effective method for controlling post-operative pain, and complications are rare [20]. The surgical complication rate for EIMC is < 1%, with minor bleeding and infection accounting for the majority of cases [16, 21]. EIMC is considered to be a cheaper, simpler, and safer procedure compared to circumcision of older boys and men [7, 22].

Even so, the fear of pain and the risk of the procedure were reported to be the major barriers to EIMC [9, 10, 23]. Therefore, EIMC should be done safely to increase acceptance by parents. This can be achieved through proper training, proper instrumentation and sterilization, and complete instructions to the parents of newborns [23]. Devices, such as the AccuCirc, Mogen clamp, and Gomco clamp, which are bloodless, require no sutures, and are associated with minimum pain, are also helpful to ensure the safety of the procedure [21].

Based on this evidence and the fact that most parents (84.2%) would like to know the health benefits of circumcision, as suggested in the present investigation, we speculate that the willingness and acceptance of EIMC would increase in China if the parents of newborns were provided with sufficient information about EIMC (especially the father, who usually has the final say [66.7%]), which is consistent with the findings in reports from other countries [9, 19, 24]. Indeed, education about EIMC can be easily achieved through free booklets and lectures aimed at the father-to-be. Studies from other countries have shown that providing educational information about the benefits of circumcision and HIV prevention could increase the decision to circumcise a newborn son [25, 26].

One limitation of this study was that we did not investigate the effect of educational interventions on decision-making about EIMC. In addition, the sample of the present study was obtained from Nanjing city, but not from China as a whole, so one should be careful when these findings are generalized to the entire country as regional variations cannot be excluded. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of educational interventions in a more representative sample within China.

Conclusions

Generally, the willingness and acceptance of EIMC in China is low and the parents of newborns are usually not very affirmative when making a decision regarding EIMC. The major reason for EIMC unwillingness is concern about pain and risk of the procedure. Sufficient education about the benefits of circumcision and HIV prevention is needed if EIMC is to be implemented as an HIV prevention strategy in China.

Authors’contributions

Pan Lianjun and Wang Zhong designed the study. Zhang Aixia and Shen Rong conducted the study and collected the data. Pan Lianjun analyzed the data, performed the statistical analysis, drafted the article, and revised the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30972995).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Urology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University
(2)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University
(3)
Department of Urology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

References

  1. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A: Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: The ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med. 2005, 2 (11): e298-10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, Williams CF, Campbell RT, Ndinya-Achola JO: Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007, 369: 643-656. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60312-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F, Kiwanuka N, Moulton LH, Chaudhary MA, Chen MZ, Sewankambo NK, Wabwire-Mangen F, Bacon MC, Williams CF, Opendi P, Reynolds SJ, Laeyendecker O, Quinn TC, Wawer MJ: Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: A randomised trial. Lancet. 2007, 369: 657-666. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60313-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. WHO/UNAIDS: New data on male circumcision and HIV prevention: policy and programme implications. 2007, Montreux: WHO/UNAIDSGoogle Scholar
  5. Wiswell TE, Geschke DW: Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics. 1989, 83: 1011-1015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. El Bcheraoui C, Greenspan J, Kretsinger K, Chen R: Rates of selected neonatal male circumcision associated severe adverse events in the United States, 2007–2009. 2010, Vienna: International AIDS Conference, 18Google Scholar
  7. Kalichman SC: Neonatal circumcision for HIV prevention: Cost, culture, and behavioral considerations. PLoS Med. 2010, 7: e1000219-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000219.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Plank RM, Makhema J, Kebaabetswe P, Hussein F, Lesetedi C, Halperin D, Bassil B, Shapiro R, Lockman S: Acceptability of Infant male circumcision as part of HIV prevention and male reproductive health efforts in Gaborone, Botswana, and surrounding areas. AIDS Behav. 2010, 14: 1198-1202. 10.1007/s10461-009-9632-0.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Mavhu W, Hatzold K, Laver SM, Sherman J, Tengende BR, Mangenah C, Langhaug LF, Hart G, Cowan FM: Acceptability of early infant male circumcision as an HIV prevention intervention in Zimbabwe: a qualitative perspective. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (2): e32475-10.1371/journal.pone.0032475.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Mavhu W, Buzdugan R, Langhaug LF, Hatzold K, Benedikt C, Sherman J, Laver SM, Mundida O, Woelk G, Cowan FM: Prevalence and factors associated with knowledge of and willingness for male circumcision in rural Zimbabwe. Trop Med Int Health. 2011, 16 (5): 589-597. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02744.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang N, Wang L, Wu Z, Guo W, Sun X, Poundstone K, Wang Y: Estimating the number of people living with HIV/AIDS in China: 2003–09. Int J Epidemiol. 2010, 39 (Suppl2): ii21-ii28.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. JOINT UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS): http://www.unaids.org.cn/en/index/page.asp?id=197&class=2&classname=China+Epidemic+%26+Response(accessed July 12, 2011)
  13. Albero G, Castellsagué X, Giuliano AR, Bosch FX: Male circumcision and genital human papillomavirus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Dis. 2012, 39 (2): 104-113. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182387abd.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ben KL, Xu JC, Lu L, Yao JP, Min XD, Li WY, Tao J, Wang J, Li JJ, Cao XM: Promoting male circumcision in China for preventing HIV infection and improving reproductive health. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2008, 14: 291-297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Morris BJ: Why circumcision is a biomedical imperative for the 21(st) century. Bioessays. 2007, 29: 1147-1158. 10.1002/bies.20654.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Christakis DA, Harvey E, Zerr DM, Feudtner C, Wright JA, Connell FA: A trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcision. Pediatrics. 2000, 105: 246-249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Weiss HA, Larke N, Halperin D, Schenker I: Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review. BMC Urol. 2010, 10: 2-10.1186/1471-2490-10-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Oh SJ, Kim KD, Kim KM, Kim KS, Kim KK, Kim JS, Kim HG, Woo YN, Yoon YL, Lee SD, Han SW, Lee SI, Choi H: Knowledge and attitudes of Korean parents towards their son’s circumcision: a nationwide questionnaire study. BJU Int. 2002, 89: 426-432. 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01964.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Waters E, Stringer E, Mugisa B, Temba S, Bowa K, Linyama D: Acceptability of neonatal male circumcision in Lusaka, Zambia. AIDS Care. 2012, 24: 12-19. 10.1080/09540121.2011.587508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ridings H, Amaya M: Male neonate circumcision: an evidence-based review. JAAPA. 2007, 20: 32-34. 36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gee WF, Ansell JS: Neonate circumcision: a ten-year overview: with comparison of the Gomco clamp and the Plastibell device. Pediatrics. 1976, 58: 824-827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Binagwaho A, Pegurri E, Muita J, Bertozzi S: Male circumcision at different ages in Rwanda: a cost-effectiveness study. PLoS Med. 2010, 7: e1000211-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000211.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Westercamp N, Bailey RC: Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. AIDS Behav. 2007, 11: 341-355. 10.1007/s10461-006-9169-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Madhivanan P, Krupp K, Chandrasekaran V, Karat SC, Reingold AL, Klausner JD: Acceptability of male circumcision among mothers with male children in Mysore, India. AIDS. 2008, 22: 983-988. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282ffde52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Gust DA, Kretsinger K, Gaul Z, Pals S, Heffelfinger JD, Begley E, Chen RT, Kilmarx PH: Acceptability of newborn circumcision to prevent HIV infection in the United States. Sex Transm Dis. 2011, 38: 536-542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tieu HV, Phanuphak N, Ananworanich J, Vatanparast R, Jadwattanakul T, Pharachetsakul N, Mingkwanrungrueng P, Buajoom R, Teeratakulpisarn S, Teeratakulpisarn N, Methajittiphun P, Hammer SM, Ann Chiasson M, Phanuphak P: Acceptability of male circumcision for the prevention of HIV among high-risk heterosexual men in Thailand. Sex Transm Dis. 2010, 37: 352-355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/738/prepub

Copyright

© Pan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement